The SEC Tournament Deconstructed, and a Kudos to the Deserving

Statistics and analysis is something that this blog has always tried hard to do consistently and well, and we have a lot of readers who seem to enjoy them. Kyvampyre, a friend who frequents the live blogs here at A Sea of Blue, e-mailed me a very interesting set of numbers today, and I promised I would create a blog post out of it.
So what we have here is essentially the statistical probability for each team to succeed in each round of the SEC tournament. You will notice the teams with the "byes" have a 100% chance of getting through to the quarter finals. Of course, that presumes that said teams actually show up at the tournament site in sufficient numbers to put a team on the court or doesn't disqualify itself for an as yet undisclosed NCAA violation, but barring that, there is no way to lose a game you don't have to play.
Moving right along, the first number you see below is the Pythagorean calculation for expected win percentage. Now you may ask yourself, "How the heck did Pythagoras ever get involved in basketball?" Well, for a Greek, old Pythagoras really got around. You probably believed that James Naismith invented basketball, but actually, ol' Pythagoras was the first hoopster to pull off the 360 dunk. Bet you didn't know that.
But of course, I am pulling your leg. The reason this winning percentage is named after Pythagoras is because of it's resemblance to the Pythagorean Theorem. It was designed for use in baseball, but Ken Pomeroy and others have applied it to basketball as well, and it seems to work fine.
The mathematical principle for applying this idea is discussed in more depth here, and you are free to peruse it at your leisure, but for now we will just look at Kyvampyre's results, sorted by percentage of winning the championship:
| Team | Pyth. Win % | Quarters | Semis | Finals | Champion |
| Tennessee | 0.96 | 100.00% | 89.33% | 66.46% | 49.93% |
| Mississippi St. | 0.92 | 100.00% | 63.58% | 40.72% | 16.16% |
| Arkansas | 0.91 | 100.00% | 61.17% | 20.18% | 10.94% |
| Kentucky | 0.87 | 100.00% | 56.47% | 23.80% | 6.95% |
| Vanderbilt | 0.89 | 80.30% | 35.61% | 10.21% | 4.97% |
| Florida | 0.89 | 66.19% | 27.44% | 15.34% | 4.96% |
| Ole Miss | 0.87 | 70.52% | 34.95% | 14.58% | 4.21% |
| Alabama | 0.8 | 33.81% | 8.98% | 3.55% | 0.73% |
| South Carolina | 0.75 | 50.67% | 5.47% | 1.46% | 0.40% |
| LSU | 0.75 | 49.33% | 5.20% | 1.36% | 0.37% |
| Georgia | 0.74 | 29.48% | 8.58% | 2.01% | 0.31% |
| Auburn | 0.66 | 19.70% | 3.22% | 0.33% | 0.06% |
You will note that I have highlighted a couple of interesting disconnects in the earlier rounds compared with where the odds line up for the championship. I won't discuss them in detail except to say that they relate directly to the teams they are expected to play in that round. For example, if Florida gets past their quarterfinal game, they have a better chance of getting to the finals than Vanderbilt. Just some interesting things to note.
As we can see, Kentucky is the fourth most likely to win the whole thing, but their percentage isn't too good at only 7%. Tennessee is a prohibitive favorite all the way through, as you would expect.
Thanks to kyvampyre for the interesting work.

At this point, I would like to comment on the news that Billy Gillispie will share the SEC COY title with Bruce Pearl. Many of you know that I have a certain animus toward Coach Pearl, and that is not going to change. But what will also not change is that Bruce Pearl is a fine coach who deserves this recognition. But nobody deserves it as much as Gillispie.
Billy Gillispie has doggedly stuck to his principles all year long, despite fan disgust and both national and some local media types laughing up their sleeve and pointing to the success of Tubby Smith turning Minnesota around. All those chickens have now come home to roost, and Gillispie is the rooster crowing atop the hen-house. I hope that is sweet for him, because we often see coaches abandon their principles and take action in response to either media, fan, or athletic department criticism. I cannot say for sure, but it appears to me that Gillispie doggedly stuck to his guns and it paid off in a way that could not have worked out better for him.
But before we get too caught up in giving Gillispie a well-earned pat on the back, let's not forget how this team found a way to have a meeting of the minds with the coach, and change their fortunes virtually on a dime. Even the loss of the team's most promising and arguably best player as well as one of our leading scorers from the pre-season has not changed this team's fortune, and that isn't just due to coaching. This team, coach and players together have delivered as a team, and it took an effort by both the coach and the players to finally set aside their differences and agree to attempt the impossible.
At this point, I am not willing to concede that this team cannot go deep into the tournament no matter what their seed. This bunch is among the most determined and relentless groups I can ever remember, including the Unforgettables. Remember, the Unforgettables had a first-round NBA draft pick playing for them all season, and even though Patterson is arguably going to go there as well, he has been unavailable for the last two games and won't be back until next season. This has been a team effort, and I wish there was a "team of the year" award for the group that simply refuses to give in to adversity and succeeds in spite of it. It has been utterly inspirational.
Congratulations to Coaches Gillispie and Pearl, and to all the Wildcats who received honors. What a year this has been, and there is more yet to come.
Update [2008-3-12 8:10:32 by Truzenzuzex]: Missing link to discussion of the tournament results estimate has been added. Please excuse the omission.
0 recs |
16
comments
Comments
Kudos to your coach
My only beef with the awards is that they refused to make decisions:
2 Coach of the Year awards
2 Freshman of the Year awards
9 players on the 1st team (how the heck to they fit on the court at the same time?!?)
8 players on the 2nd team (ditto)
Perhaps my logic differs from the crowd on the 1st and 2nd team, but it is clear they didn't go to any lengths to separate anybody.
But that does not take away from any of the achievements. Everybody on each list played/coached outstanding ball, and a very sincere kudos to them for it. It's just a little annoying to have "everybody wins" awards handed out to such competitive people.
by hooper on Mar 11, 2008 9:34 PM EDT 0 recs
It's all a matter of advanced basketball physics
Well, it's complicated, but it basically boils down to a principle in quantum dynamics and high level physics where high energy basketball players can occupy the same space (the court) at the same time. Of course, one of the downsides is that you can't ever observe all the players at the same time - the very act of observing changes which players can be observed at any certain time.
It's either that, or they tie them together like in a 3-legged race,
by JLeverenz on
Mar 11, 2008 10:31 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Classic
(Granted, that'd be low-energy basketball players, but these guys are so cool that it'd work...)
by hooper on
Mar 12, 2008 12:36 PM EDT
up
0 recs
BCG
And no disrespect to Calathes (whose release I personally find amazing, so so quick and still accurate) - but Patterson is a more dominating and intimidating player on the court and under the basket for one, and secondly (and more importantly) managed to take on a leadership role on a team with 2 very good seniors and did a huge variety of things not seen in the box score.
And I would put our chances at higher than 7% for winning the SECT - I think its more like 30 or 40%.
by cdnWildcatfan on Mar 11, 2008 11:02 PM EDT 0 recs
and maybe I shouldn't trust my memory at all
HELP! Im too lazy to find a random stat like this on the web - I usually would read such a fact here at ASOB
by cdnWildcatfan on
Mar 11, 2008 11:08 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Clyde's Trophies
One caveat: He was voted COY by either the coaches, or an accredited media outlet.
by Ken Howlett on
Mar 11, 2008 11:42 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Details on theorem
I was feeling kind of nerdy and wanted to see the derivatives of the data... :)
by TrickyD26 on Mar 12, 2008 12:28 AM EDT 0 recs
Sorry ...
Check it out.
by Truzenzuzex on
Mar 12, 2008 8:12 AM EDT
up
0 recs
I completely agree
But, in no way did he endure half of what BCG endured throughout this wild year. The tough loss, the heavy criticism, the doubters, etc., and to top it all off, he has overcome them. He has shown us the kind of play we've been waiting a long time for from Crawford and Bradley.
In my opinion, if anyone deserves Nat. COY, it's him.
As for the Freshmen of the Year award, I would have to agree cdnWildcatfan on that one. Calathes is a great player, no doubt. But Patterson [when he was playing] was so much more of a presence on the court and not just because of his size and skill. Every emotion on his face can be read like an open book and he's a great leader. The kid is a force to be reckoned with in the future and I think that should have been a no brainer as well.
by Carissa on Mar 12, 2008 12:41 AM EDT 0 recs
Splitting CoY
I asked in the news thread what would be someone's proposed method for settling it after a fair vote ended in a tie. My suggestion was a winner take all arm-wrestling contest. I can just see Billy Clyde turning his hat backwards just before he takes Pearl "Over the Top."
by chirop1 on Mar 12, 2008 7:26 AM EDT 0 recs
I'm actually ...
by Truzenzuzex on
Mar 12, 2008 8:13 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Absolutely deserves it
by chirop1 on
Mar 12, 2008 9:22 AM EDT
up
0 recs
I understand how the tie occurred,
For example, I'd rather see a revote between Pearl and Gill.; if the second vote is a tie, then split the award. But again, it's not that I mind ties so much as I am bothered by a lot of ties. And yes, that's purely a personal preference.
by hooper on
Mar 12, 2008 12:35 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Apparently...
by chirop1 on
Mar 12, 2008 1:12 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Absolutely true.
(Or, Pearl and Gill.'s votes would have been discarded in the re-vote and Pearl still would have needed all 3 to win outright. Either way, BCG would have the advantage.)
But this is getting deeper into a dissection of the voting than is probably appropriate. Both of us seem to believe that both coaches did an outstanding job this year in their own respective ways, and I'm willing to give a hearty h/t to both. Much as I love a discussion about this kind of thing, I really don't want to be "that UT guy" who starts a row about it all on a UK site. Especially when I'm actually quite happy for both of them.
BCG deserves a ton of credit for the second half of this season. I hope that nothing I've said diminishes my respect for him.
by hooper on
Mar 12, 2008 6:21 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Probabilities
by KYvamypre on Mar 12, 2008 10:03 AM EDT 0 recs








