A Sea Of Blue: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: The Boxing Bulletin for Boxing Fans!

The SEC Tournament Deconstructed, and a Kudos to the Deserving

Statistics and analysis is something that this blog has always tried hard to do consistently and well, and we have a lot of readers who seem to enjoy them.  Kyvampyre, a friend who frequents the live blogs here at A Sea of Blue, e-mailed me a very interesting set of numbers today, and I promised I would create a blog post out of it.

So what we have here is essentially the statistical probability for each team to succeed in each round of the SEC tournament.   You will notice the teams with the "byes" have a 100% chance of getting through to the quarter finals.  Of course, that presumes that said teams actually show up at the tournament site in sufficient numbers to put a team on the court or doesn't disqualify itself for an as yet undisclosed NCAA violation, but barring that, there is no way to lose a game you don't have to play.

Moving right along, the first number you see below is the Pythagorean calculation for expected win percentage.  Now you may ask yourself, "How the heck did Pythagoras ever get involved in basketball?"  Well, for a Greek, old Pythagoras really got around.  You probably believed that James Naismith invented basketball, but actually, ol' Pythagoras was the first hoopster to pull off the 360 dunk.  Bet you didn't know that.

But of course, I am pulling your leg.  The reason this winning percentage is named after Pythagoras is because of it's resemblance to the Pythagorean Theorem.  It was designed for use in baseball, but Ken Pomeroy and others have applied it to basketball as well, and it seems to work fine.

The mathematical principle for applying this idea is discussed in more depth here, and you are free to peruse it at your leisure, but for now we will just look at Kyvampyre's results, sorted by percentage of winning the championship:

Team Pyth. Win % Quarters Semis Finals Champion
Tennessee 0.96 100.00% 89.33% 66.46% 49.93%
Mississippi St. 0.92 100.00% 63.58% 40.72% 16.16%
Arkansas 0.91 100.00% 61.17% 20.18% 10.94%
Kentucky 0.87 100.00% 56.47% 23.80% 6.95%
Vanderbilt 0.89 80.30% 35.61% 10.21% 4.97%
Florida 0.89 66.19% 27.44% 15.34% 4.96%
Ole Miss 0.87 70.52% 34.95% 14.58% 4.21%
Alabama 0.8 33.81% 8.98% 3.55% 0.73%
South Carolina 0.75 50.67% 5.47% 1.46% 0.40%
LSU 0.75 49.33% 5.20% 1.36% 0.37%
Georgia 0.74 29.48% 8.58% 2.01% 0.31%
Auburn 0.66 19.70% 3.22% 0.33% 0.06%

You will note that I have highlighted a couple of interesting disconnects in the earlier rounds compared with where the odds line up for the championship.  I won't discuss them in detail except to say that they relate directly to the teams they are expected to play in that round.  For example, if Florida gets past their quarterfinal game, they have a better chance of getting to the finals than Vanderbilt.  Just some interesting things to note.

As we can see, Kentucky is the fourth most likely to win the whole thing, but their percentage isn't too good at only 7%.  Tennessee is a prohibitive favorite all the way through, as you would expect.

Thanks to kyvampyre for the interesting work.


At this point, I would like to comment on the news that Billy Gillispie will share the SEC COY title with Bruce Pearl.  Many of you know that I have a certain animus toward Coach Pearl, and that is not going to change.  But what will also not change is that Bruce Pearl is a fine coach who deserves this recognition.  But nobody deserves it as much as Gillispie.

Billy Gillispie has doggedly stuck to his principles all year long, despite fan disgust and both national and some local media types laughing up their sleeve and pointing to the success of Tubby Smith turning Minnesota around.  All those chickens have now come home to roost, and Gillispie is the rooster crowing atop the hen-house.  I hope that is sweet for him, because we often see coaches abandon their principles and take action in response to either media, fan, or athletic department criticism.  I cannot say for sure, but it appears to me that Gillispie doggedly stuck to his guns and it paid off in a way that could not have worked out better for him.

But before we get too caught up in giving Gillispie a well-earned pat on the back, let's not forget how this team found a way to have a meeting of the minds with the coach, and change their fortunes virtually on a dime.  Even the loss of the team's most promising and arguably best player as well as one of our leading scorers from the pre-season has not changed this team's fortune, and that isn't just due to coaching.  This team, coach and players together have delivered as a team, and it took an effort by both the coach and the players to finally set aside their differences and agree to attempt the impossible.

At this point, I am not willing to concede that this team cannot go deep into the tournament no matter what their seed.  This bunch is among the most determined and relentless groups I can ever remember, including the Unforgettables.  Remember, the Unforgettables had a first-round NBA draft pick playing for them all season, and even though Patterson is arguably going to go there as well, he has been unavailable for the last two games and won't be back until next season.  This has been a team effort, and I wish there was a "team of the year" award for the group that simply refuses to give in to adversity and succeeds in spite of it.  It has been utterly inspirational.

Congratulations to Coaches Gillispie and Pearl, and to all the Wildcats who received honors.  What a year this has been, and there is more yet to come.

Update [2008-3-12 8:10:32 by Truzenzuzex]:  Missing link to discussion of the tournament results estimate has been added.  Please excuse the omission.

0 recs  |  Comment 16 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Kudos to your coach
and to your players who earned awards.

My only beef with the awards is that they refused to make decisions:

2 Coach of the Year awards

2 Freshman of the Year awards

9 players on the 1st team (how the heck to they fit on the court at the same time?!?)

8 players on the 2nd team (ditto)

Perhaps my logic differs from the crowd on the 1st and 2nd team, but it is clear they didn't go to any lengths to separate anybody.

But that does not take away from any of the achievements.  Everybody on each list played/coached outstanding ball, and a very sincere kudos to them for it.  It's just a little annoying to have "everybody wins" awards handed out to such competitive people.

by Hooper on Mar 11, 2008 9:34 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

It's all a matter of advanced basketball physics
9 players on the 1st team (how the heck to they fit on the court at the same time?!?)

Well, it's complicated, but it basically boils down to a principle in quantum dynamics and high level physics where high energy basketball players can occupy the same space (the court) at the same time.  Of course, one of the downsides is that you can't ever observe all the players at the same time - the very act of observing changes which players can be observed at any certain time.

It's either that, or they tie them together like in a 3-legged race,

Looking for a rock to wind a piece of string around.

by JLeverenz on Mar 11, 2008 10:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Classic
Watching the best players of the SEC imitated a B-E condensate?  Lovely!

(Granted, that'd be low-energy basketball players, but these guys are so cool that it'd work...)

by Hooper on Mar 12, 2008 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

BCG
Granted, I could be stating the obvious because I haven't read any of the articles about him being named coCoach of the Year, but doesn't that mean that he has won the award (for the respective conference he was in at the time) 3 out of the last 4 years now,  WITH THREE DIFFERENT TEAMS in THREE DIFFERENT conferences - is that some sort of record?  Regardless, that is amazing and should get national coverage if my memory is serving me correct.

And no disrespect to Calathes (whose release I personally find amazing, so so quick and still accurate) - but Patterson is a more dominating and intimidating player on the court and under the basket for one, and secondly (and more importantly) managed to take on a leadership role on a team with 2 very good seniors and did a huge variety of things not seen in the box score.

And I would put our chances at higher than 7% for winning the SECT - I think its more like 30 or 40%.

by cdnWildcatfan on Mar 11, 2008 11:02 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

and maybe I shouldn't trust my memory at all
because BCG was obviously at A&M for 3 years, so it couldn't be 3 in 4 years (unless he won two at A&M - which could have happened) but more likely 3 in 5 years.
HELP! Im too lazy to find a random stat like this on the web - I usually would read such a fact here at ASOB

by cdnWildcatfan on Mar 11, 2008 11:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Clyde's Trophies
Gillispie has won 5, count 'em, 5 Coach of the Year awards, in a row. (Obviously theat is conference Coach of the Year)

One caveat: He was voted COY by either the coaches, or an accredited media outlet.

by Ken Howlett on Mar 11, 2008 11:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Details on theorem
Above the table you said the principle was discussed more in depth "here." Didn't see a link or anything, am I missing it or was it left off?

I was feeling kind of nerdy and wanted to see the derivatives of the data... :)

http://tournament.fantasysports.yahoo.com/t1/register/joingroup ID: 10939 password: wildcats08

by TrickyD26 on Mar 12, 2008 12:28 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Sorry ...
I added the link above.  I must have overlooked linking it when I wrote the article, but it's there now.

Check it out.

by Truzenzuzex on Mar 12, 2008 8:12 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I completely agree
with everything that was said in the article about the Coach of the Year decision. It irks me that they couldn't make a decision when personally, I think the choice should be very clear by now. Sure, Pearl is an excellent coach. He has brought life to the Tenn. basketball program unlike any coach (in the mens) before him.

But, in no way did he endure half of what BCG endured throughout this wild year. The tough loss, the heavy criticism, the doubters, etc., and to top it all off, he has overcome them. He has shown us the kind of play we've been waiting a long time for from Crawford and Bradley.

In my opinion, if anyone deserves Nat. COY, it's him.

As for the Freshmen of the Year award, I would have to agree cdnWildcatfan on that one. Calathes is a great player, no doubt. But Patterson [when he was playing] was so much more of a presence on the court and not just because of his size and skill. Every emotion on his face can be read like an open book and he's a great leader. The kid is a force to be reckoned with in the future and I think that should have been a no brainer as well.

by Carissa on Mar 12, 2008 12:41 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Splitting CoY
I don't understand the difficulty people have with splitting the award.  Its not a like a panel of 12 coaches got toghether and said "Awww hell... I can't decide, lets just give it to both the boys."  If I'm not mistaken, the coaches voted and 4 went for BCG, 4 for Pearl, 2 for Stansbury, and 2 for someone else.  That's a fair reason for a tie.

I asked in the news thread what would be someone's proposed method for settling it after a fair vote ended in a tie.  My suggestion was a winner take all arm-wrestling contest.  I can just see Billy Clyde turning his hat backwards just before he takes Pearl "Over the Top."

by chirop1 on Mar 12, 2008 7:26 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm actually ...
fine with splitting it.  I'm just glad Gillilspie got a piece, he richly deserves it.

by Truzenzuzex on Mar 12, 2008 8:13 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Absolutely deserves it
Especially after that stretch in November/December when even the most rational around this website were asking "Is this really the kind of coaching job it takes to win Big XII coach of the year?????"  We all knew he was a turnaround artist... I just don't think we expected to be an in season 180.

by chirop1 on Mar 12, 2008 9:22 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I understand how the tie occurred,
and I don't mind too much having a split here and there, but the awards handed out by coaches were overstocked in so many places, it looks diluted to me.  I'd rather see a system where ties are re-voted  than where a bunch of overs are handed out.

For example, I'd rather see a revote between Pearl and Gill.; if the second vote is a tie, then split the award.  But again, it's not that I mind ties so much as I am bothered by a lot of ties.  And yes, that's purely a personal preference.

by Hooper on Mar 12, 2008 12:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Apparently...
Gillispie voted for Pearl and Pearl voted for Stansbury... ironically, if BCG had voted for anyone other than the shirtless wonder, he would have the award all to himself!

by chirop1 on Mar 12, 2008 1:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Absolutely true.
And if a second vote had occurred, Bruce would have cast his vote toward BCG, meaning that Pearl would have had to earned all 3 remaining votes to win.

(Or, Pearl and Gill.'s votes would have been discarded in the re-vote and Pearl still would have needed all 3 to win outright.  Either way, BCG would have the advantage.)

But this is getting deeper into a dissection of the voting than is probably appropriate.  Both of us seem to believe that both coaches did an outstanding job this year in their own respective ways, and I'm willing to give a hearty h/t to both.  Much as I love a discussion about this kind of thing, I really don't want to be "that UT guy" who starts a row about it all on a UK site.  Especially when I'm actually quite happy for both of them.

BCG deserves a ton of credit for the second half of this season.  I hope that nothing I've said diminishes my respect for him.

by Hooper on Mar 12, 2008 6:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Probabilities
I just wanted to point out that the reason Ole Miss and Florida have better chances to reach the finals than Vanderbilt is more a function of the bracket set-up than a judgment on the relative merits of the three teams. If Vanderbilt reaches the semis, odds are about 9-to-1 that they'll have to play Tennessee to reach the finals. As Tru noted, UT is a prohibitive favorite in the tournament and so Vanderbilt's odds of beating them are less than those of Florida or Ole Miss, who would likely play Mississippi State or Kentucky in the semis, teams who they have a more even matchup against. It looks a little counterintuitive without that note.

by KYvamypre on Mar 12, 2008 10:03 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

An exciting community-driven SBNation blog, by and for fans of the Kentucky Wildcats.

Community Guidelines
[UPDATED 3/31/2009]
Start posting about the Wildcats »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Guess The Outcome Game 2009 #00

Recent FanPosts

Small
Milestones
Home_view_small
For Those That Complain
Small
GOG 2009 #04
Small
another Big Blue basketball news site.
128_small
The SEC In Bowls
Small
Small Rotation...
Small
GOG 2009 #03
Miners__2__small
UK football notes, 11/18
Uk_logo_blue_small
The Tournament Lasts All Year This Year
500642986_l_small
Would Wall's shot merit a "Golden Spike?"

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Twitter Widget -- Follow me!


Managing Editor

Tru_small Truzenzuzex

Editor

Small Ken Howlett

Author

Diane-black_heels_small BigSkyCat

Official Partner of CBS Sports