Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dana White Announces Koscheck vs. Hendricks for UFC on FOX

Stonybrook University at Kentucky -- After Action Report

Sorry for the delay, guys and gals, just another one of those days.

First of all, thanks to all of you who joined our liveblog last night.  I think we will be doing this again for the North Carolina game, but I'm not sure at this point.  I'm going to have to post less often if we do, because very frequent updates made it hard to watch the action.  I'll just have to find a happy medium, I guess -- basketball is a fast game.

Offense

Kentucky's offense was atrocious last night, and I personally think that flatters it unmercifully.  Shooting 48% against a 0-5 team is not only inexplicable, but inexcusable.  The only people who shot a respectable percentage (and took a significant number of shots) were Perry Stevenson and Patrick Patterson.  Thank God for them, for without both of them, UK surely would have lost.

UK's guard play, which had been outstanding lately, was almost a self-parody, a comedy of errors.  23 turnovers is simply a bizarre number, with the two point guards accounting for almost half of them.  If the Cats can handle the ball no better than this, they will not be very competitive this year.

A simple 2-3 zone defense completely shut down the Wildcats.  I know, I know -- there are more holes in a 2-3 zone than in a pound of petite Swiss cheese, but the Wildcats either couldn't find them, or impatiently jacked up bad shots hoping to shoot the Seawolves out of it.  It didn't work.  Consequently, Patterson and Stevenson had to work very hard for everything they got.

Kentucky's 3 point shooting was 10%.  Let me write that again -- 10%, as in 1 for 10.  I have no words.

Defense

To be honest, the defense wasn't that bad.  Stonybrook only shot 35% from the floor, although they shot well from 3-point land, 42%.  Still, they only took seven shots from outside, so that is a percentage we can live with.  Holding a team to only 3 made 3-pointers, regardless of their shooting percentage, is darn good.

Our free throw defense was stout as well.  "What?", you say, "How can we defend the free throw line?"  You got me, but somehow we did.  Stonybrook shot a squalid 55% from the charity stripe, contributing significantly to Kentucky's cause.  Stonybrook turned the ball over 19 times themselves, 11 of them by way of steals.  UK did get backdoored several times, a continuing problem, but overall, the defense was reasonably efficient.

What wasn't so efficient was the fact that UK only managed to outrebound the tiny Seawolves by 9, 40-31.  If that's the best UK can do against a school with no player taller than 6'9", what is North Carolina going to do to Kentucky on the boards?

Players

  • Joe Crawford -- Two words describe his game last night -- utter futility.  Not that he didn't hustle, or play defense.  He rebounded pretty well with 6 boards.  But he couldn't throw it in the ocean from a rowboat.  His shot selection was also somewhat questionable, but I don't think I could label it selfish.  He just shot horribly, and it affected his confidence, but he didn't give up.

  • Ramel Bradley -- Ramel reverted to pre-Liberty form.  He was either so bad or so headstrong that Gillispie simply benched him in favor of Porter, who was merrily screwing around and having a nightmare night of his own.  This was truly a case of a team without leadership, the blind leading the blind.  Here is the statistic that tells it all -- Bradley, 22 minutes.  Porter, 34 minutes.

  • Patrick Patterson -- Pat played well, double-double and all, but I expected more leadership from him.  He is deferring too much to Bradley and Crawford, and even though he is a freshman, we need him to step into the breach when those other to worthies decide to make a mess of things.  Good game, but I though he could have done more.  I know he has it in him.

  • Perry Stevenson --  The lone bright spot among mud splatters, Perry played perhaps his best game as a Wildcat:  18 points, 10 rebounds (7 offensive) 2 assists, 3 steals 1 block on 8-11 shooting.  That's a line you can be proud of, regardless of the opponent.  Perry, great game young man.

  • Alex Legion -- Alex continues to struggle shooting, but his line was otherwise acceptable.  He was the guy who kept getting beat on the backdoor play, but that is a freshman for you.  Legion will get better, but he wasn't too much help last night.

  • AJ Stewart -- Apparently, the young man was benched for falling asleep in a film session.  Hmm.  Well, there you go -- get thee to bed on time, freshman.

  • Michael Porter -- The kid struggled.  I hope he gets better, but he really struggled to do anything last night.  Made some nice passes, did lead the team in assists, but had four assists and five turnovers.  He seemed a bit out of his depth -- Michael needs to gain some confidence, but a poor night shooting the ball (0-4) will hurt the swagger of the best of them.

Overall

The Cats again took 2 steps back last night after some good forward progress the previous two games.  Bradley was a problem, and why, nobody knows.  Crawford played hard, but ineffectively.  The brightest spot of all was getting Ramon Harris back, and he would have had a good line but for the 4 turnovers, two of them which led directly to easy baskets for Stonybrook.

This team is truly like Forrest Gump's box of chocolates -- you never know what you are going to get.  We may come out against the Tar Heels looking like worldbeaters, or Gardner-Webb victims, it's just hard to say.

Gillispie had this to say that about sums up the game:

"They didn't guard the wings for the most part in the first half and we stood there and basically guarded ourselves."

Yep.  That's what happened, all right.

Comment 5 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

UNC on Saturday..
If Porter plays more than 10 minutes UK loses by 30+.. he is in over his head at UK.  Great kid, maybe he should switch to UK's football team.

I have not been and I am not a fan of either Crawford's or Bradley's game but if they BOTH shoot lights out against UNC then UK has a chance.

However, I would expect something like UNC 92 UK 64 as PP gets 2 early fouls and ends up being a non factor thus UK has no shot.

by BeatUL on Nov 29, 2007 12:37 AM EST reply actions  

I don't agree ...
I think Porter can be a contributor at UK, and evidently, Gillispie does as well.

Porter has a ways to go to become a solid SEC backup point, but I think he will get there.  Gillispie seems to believe in him, and I see no reason to second guess him on that issue.  Porter needs to develop more confidence in his ballhandling, and needs more reps.  He may have a chance to get them with Jasper down with injury.

I have seen this team play good enough basketball to beat UNC so far this year, and I have seen them play bad enough to lose big.  We'll just have to see which team shows up on Saturday.  

I am not getting caught up in a bunch of naysaying.  Is competing with UNC going to be a challenge?  You bet.  But this is Kentucky, and we have beaten better before.  

If we lose, nobody will be too surprised given the fact that two potential starters are injured and a third is just coming back from injury.  Kentucky simply isn't deep enough to withstand that kind of depletion and field a team with a really great shot at knocking off the Tar Heels.  

Still, I refuse to give up on this team just because they are facing a highly ranked program.  They have played hard, if not particularly well.  That alone plus the talent of Patterson, Bradley, Legion and Crawford give us a chance.

by Glenn Logan on Nov 29, 2007 7:38 AM EST up reply actions  

Porter
I am not disagreeing with you Tru. Porter has shown last year, as well as at times this year, that he can compete at a high level.

He at times, though, seems overmatched. I think Gillispie has no choice but to throw the kid into the fire, because he has no other options.

Let's hope Tru is right. Because if he isn't, we could be in for a long year.

by Ken Howlett on Nov 29, 2007 9:57 PM EST up reply actions  

BeatUL
I gotta agree with BeatUL. I have never been a fan of Porter's game and dont think he is good enough to play at UK BUT we sure should be happy to have him this year as we wouldnt even have a back up point guard this season if he wasnt around. I think he will get better but he just doesnt have the decision making skills or the ball handling skills to be a point in the SEC for any amount of game time.
DEEETROIT BASKETBALLL!!!

by davw83 on Nov 29, 2007 9:02 AM EST reply actions  

CATS by 6 on Saturday!!!
Prediction:
UK  85
UNC 79

and a "Welcome Back" to the good spotlight for Billy!
and all you negative, fair-weather fans can kiss my Big Blue Ass!

by BIGBLUEDAVE on Nov 30, 2007 1:18 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

An exciting community-driven SBNation blog, by and for fans of the Kentucky Wildcats.

Community Guidelines
[UPDATED 01/18/2012]

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Louisvillelove_small
A death in the UK family

Recent FanPosts

Small
Tebow in the JP
323_small
Game Preview: #7 UK HOOPS Vs. Tennessee Lady Vols- It's Showtime!
323_small
UK Basketball: Kentucky Is In The Zone, Defense That Is
Emberlogo_sized_small
Anticipation Open Thread
Mostdiggity_small
Somethin' Strange: Zone-Busters or Carolina Fail?
Small
GOG 2011-12 #15: Vanderbilt
Small
DDMO A Figment Of Imagination?
Small
Derek Willis Interview with FOH
Small
Great article on Cats
323_small
Tempering Great Expectations: Do We Need Coaching From Calipari?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Twitter Widget -- Follow me!


Managing Editor

Tru_small Glenn Logan

Editor

Wildcat_small BigSkyCat

Fl_family_photo_small Ken Howlett

Author

Small JLeverenz

Justified-olyphant_small jc25

Bluepaws_small a2d2

Img_0019_small Alex Scutchfield