So what has changed as a result of the Florda game?  Micah Johnson has re-injured his sprained ankle and is doubtful.  Marcus McClinton's knee is a bit worse, Myron Pyor is still out, Kyrus Lanxter is still down with a knee, Ricky Lumpkin has a strained calf, Justin Jeffries and Maurice Grinter are banged up, as is Josh Minton.  Dicky Lyons and Derrick Locke are both still out for the season (Yes, we have no miracles today).  Finally, Randall Cobb is now the starting quarterback

The Wildcats are still far from 100% healthy as they head down to Starkville to take on the Mississippi State University Bulldogs, and MSU is much, much healthier than Kentucky with only one minor injury and one major injury.  What this means is that even though UK is facing a foothill instead of Mt. Everest relatively speaking, the Wildcats still have a hill to climb against a team that went bowling last year.

Injuries are a part of football, and as much as we moan and groan about them, UK's troubles are absolutely nothing compared to what the Georgia Bulldogs have been dealing with -- they have 10  players with long-term injuries, seven of which are season-ending, and they just undressed LSU in Death Valley, 52-38.  When you are in the SEC, injuries must be overcome, and great teams overcome them.

OK, so Kentucky is not a great team this year, but can they become a competent one?  So far, UK is adequate only on defense, as even giving up 63 points to the Gators moved Kentucky down from #1 to just #7 in scoring defense.  Obviously, the 'Cats defense is better than that, but a combination of injuries and a red hot Florida offense made them look like a high school team.  The real problem, though is UK's offense, which has not been competent against SEC competition.  Yes, it has had a few good moments in the Alabama and Arkansas game, but generally speaking, the Wildcat offense has put tremendous pressure on the defense to carry the load.

Will that change with Randall Cobb now at the helm?  Obviously, we hope so, and Brooks at least thinks it may or he wouldn't have made the move.  Don't think for a minute that Rich Brooks isn't stubborn enough to thumb his nose at Kentucky fans who have been screaming at the top of their collective lungs for Randall Cobb at QB if he thinks the things that are going wrong can't be corrected to some extent with this move.  The fact that Brooks is making it is really a confirmation that the situation looks to Brooks pretty much like it looks to the rest of us -- Cobb provides an extra dimension that appears to take UK's offense from futility to some semblance of proficiency, something Kentucky has only known against inferior competition this year.  Is a merely competent offense enough to overcome our other problems?  We won't know until Saturday.

I know this is obvious, but it bears repeating -- the biggest thing Cobb can give UK at quarterback is the ability to sustain favorable field position by moving the football.  Yes, points are important also, but Kentucky has been able to beat opponents this year by keeping them in a hole and forcing turnovers and mistakes.  Against three of our last four opponents, UK was unable to do that with any consistency.  Even if a drive doesn't score, if it keeps the defense off the field a while and backs the opponent up to near their goal line, it has to be considered a strategic success.

Tactically, though, Kentucky needs to start putting points on the board.  That begins with getting the football back into the red zone with some semblance of regularity, and getting at least three points out of those efforts.  SEC teams are going to score on Kentucky, but they will score way less if the 'Cats keep them pinned down and our defense as fresh as possible.  That gives the 'Cats an opportunity to be in every game.

Another thing Cobb brings to the table that couldn't be found under Hartline is a constant threat of a big play, which he can make either with his feet or with his arm.  Cobb's mobility forces linebackers to always be concerned about him, the pass rush to be more conservative, and blitzes much more dangerous.  That puts pressure on defenses, especially linebackers, not to make bad judgments or face the possibility of turning a running back or Cobb loose in the secondary.  That makes scoring points when the Wildcats get behind much more probable.

The other thing Cobb brings, in my opinion, is confidence.  It has been clear to me, as it has to others, that the offense has lost much of its confidence in Mike Hartline's ability to run the team.  It isn't all Hartline's fault, but as I have said before, UK needs to forget about blaming people and start looking for ways to fix the problem.  Cobb's presence gives the offense more confidence, and that is very important.  A confident offense is a dangerous offense, as we all well remember from the gunslinging days of André Woodson & Co.

Finally, Cobb gives UK a look for which there is precious little tape for opponents to study.  Cobb has been used sparingly at quarterback, and he gives Phillips the freedom to call plays that the opponents simply haven't seen, which is always an advantage, and Kentucky needs every advantage they can find against SEC opponents on the road.  Mississippi State may not be as threatening a competitor as the Gators this year, but last year Brooks & Co. took the Bulldogs for granted, and they sent UK fans home from Commonwealth Stadium with frowns instead of smiles.

In the final analysis, Cobb's presence under center makes UK's offense look much more threatening than Hartline has this year.  A lot of that is because of Kentucky's youth and inexperience at wide receiver, but as I said earlier, blame is not relevant here.  What is relevant is making the offense a genuine threat, and taking some of the pressure off a defense that is trying to get healthy enough to compete for the  SEC stretch run.  It's a sure bet that if Cobb can't get that done, his stint at starting QB will be a short one.

With Arkansas riding high off of their 25-22 upset road win over Auburn, UK is once again catching an opponent feeling good about themselves (South Carolina had just won in Oxford).  Victories like that tend to build confidence and team unity, especially in a team as young as Arkansas.  Will Bobby Petrino's squad continue to improve, or was the Auburn victory more of a showcase for all that is wrong on the plains of Tubber-ville?   I know that Bobby Petrino will have his group ready to play, so UK better bring the good stuff if they harbor any hopes at all of reaching six or seven wins.

Razorback Personnel

Quarterback Casey Dick: 6'2", 215 lb senior -- On the year Dick is 115-197 through the air for 1,411 yards, five touchdowns and seven interceptions.  He has started all six Arkansas games.  Last year Dick started all 13 games and was 150-262 for 1,695 yards, with 18 touchdowns and 12 interceptions. 

Running back Michael Smith: 5'7", 173 lb junior -- Smith has 109 rushes for 599 yards, which is good for a 5.5 yards per carry average.  He leads the SEC with 119.8 yards per game and he has ran for four touchdowns.  Of course last year Smith played behind Darren McFadden and Felix Jones (both future NFL superstars), so he only garnered 46 carries for 303 yards (6.6 yards per carry) and three touchdowns. 

Tight end D.J. Williams: 6'2", 250 lb sophomore -- Williams has made 28 catches for 315 yards (11.2 yards per catch) and two touchdowns (all three totals lead the team).  He was selected to the All-SEC Freshman first team last year after making five catches for 94 yards.   

Wide receiver Joe Adams: 6'0", 175 lb freshman -- The true freshman is second on the team with 22 receptions for 285 yards (13.0 yards per catch) and one touchdown.  The multi-talented athlete is a converted cornerback.  He was ranked the #12 best cornerback prospect in the country by Rivals, and the #2 overall prospect in the state of Arkansas.  He's started in five of six games this year.

Wide receiver London Crawford: 6'2", 200 lb junior -- Smith has 15 catches for 163 yards (10.9 yards per catch).  Last year he started the first six games at split end, making eight catches for 147 yards and a touchdown.  He missed the rest of the season with a knee injury.

Wide receiver Greg Childs: 6'4", 205 lb freshman -- Childs has made 12 catches for 171 yards (14.2 yards per catch) and one touchdown.  Another true freshman, the receiver was the #9 ranked recruit in Arkansas, and was the #72 rated receiver prospect nationally.

Defensive end Adrian Davis: 6'4", 238 lb junior -- Davis is second on the team with 35 tackles.  He has also recorded three sacks (all versus Auburn), five tackles for loss and one interception.  In '07 Davis made 65 tackles (10 tackles for loss), two interceptions and three sacks.

Linebacker Jerry Franklin: 6'2", 229 lb redshirt freshman -- Franklin leads the Hogs with 48 tackles.  He also has 2.5 tackles for loss, and one interception.  Franklin is another conversion; he was the #38 rated safety prospect according to Rivals and the overall #8 prospect in Arkansas. 

Cornerback Jamar Love: 6'1", 197 lb senior -- Love has recorded seven pass-breakups, which is impressive considering the Hogs have only had to face 161 thrown passes by their opponents.  He is experienced, having played in all 13 games last year ( 22 tackles and four pass break-ups).

Continue reading this post »

The defense

Kentucky's newly vaunted defense recorded several seldom seen landmark achievements in Sunday's 27 -2 road rout of the Louisville Cardinals:

• U of L failed to score an offensive touchdown for the first time since the 2000 season.
• U of L had their lowest home point total since 1987.
• UK held an opponent to zero offensive points for the first time since 1996.
• UK last held a home opponent to two points or less in 1976.

I think it's safe to toss away those questions about Kentucky's defense.  Consider them answered. 

The credit for UK's punishing defensive effort can be spread around all over the field, from the front four ( Myron Pryor, Corey Peters, Ventrell Jenkins, Jeremy Jarmon ), to a secondary that blanketed U of L's receivers like grandma's home-made quilt.  Defensive coordinator Steve Brown must be grinning like a proud papa over his defenses rise from slightly better than incompetent, to downright devastating, in a little over a year. 

The devastation begins with Myron Pryor.  He was nothing less than a ubiquitous presence in U of L's backfield and of great concern to quarterback Hunter Cantwell.  The 'Cats only got to Cantwell for two sacks, but that doesn't begin to tell the story of what Pryor and his defensive cohorts reined down on the Card quarterback; too many pressures to count ( Pryor did have 4 ), at least 5 deflections, and a general disruption of what Cantwell was trying to achieve.  Cantwell did have occasion to scan the field, but no defense in history has pressured every pass attempt.

What made the Wildcat effort even more impressive was the fact that the four O-lineman bothered Cantwell to the point that Steve Brown didn't have to employ the blitz, which enabled UK to comfortably cover U of L's receivers, especially in the flat.  That's a reversal of a decades long trend. 

To go along with Pryor and his mates up front, middle linebacker Micah Johnson deserves credit for stopping a potential momentum swing just before the half; with UK up 10 - 0, U of L had the ball on UK's 21 yard line.  On fourth and one, UL coach Steve Kragthorpe, perhaps sensing an opportunity to change the flow of the game, decides to go for the first down instead of kicking a field goal.  The result; running back Brock Bolen is wrapped up by a swarm of Wildcat defenders led by Micah Johnson ( assisted by Pryor, and linebacker Johnny Williams ). 

Johnson ( co-team leading 5 tackles ) had this to say about UK's harassment of Cantwell, and the U of L receivers:

"We felt like he was out of sync from the word go.  We were jamming ( the receivers ), taking the timing routes away from him that they do so well.  And there was pressure on him.  Guys always had their hands up in his face."

The list of overall defensive achievements looks like this:

• A Pryor forced fumble resulting in an Ashton Cobb fumble return for a touchdown.
• Six pass break ups.
• Seven tackles for loss.
• A Johnny Williams created fumble, returned by Pryor for a touchdown.
• Five total takeaways.
• Three interceptions.
• Held U of L to 1.8 yards per rush.
• Held U of L to 5 - 16 on third downs.
• Held Cantwell to only 20 - 43 passing.
• Held U of L to only 7.6 yards per reception.
• On a Ventrell Jenkins tip, Trevard Lindley returned the interception to the U of L two yard line.
• Held U of L to 205 total yards ( only 53 passing ). 

The Card bashing didn't stop with the front four and linebackers.  UK's secondary also performed extremely well.  Trevard Lindley is the most heralded of the UK secondary, but new starting cornerback David Jones played beyond his experience ( which is nonexistent at the cornerback spot ); he was thrown at more than any other in the secondary, and he had his man covered without fail.  The only misstep he suffered was getting turned around in the end zone, allowing receiver Troy Pascley a chance for a touchdown catch, but luckily for Kentucky, he dropped the ball.  Marcus McClinton made a spectacular interception at the 6:05 mark of the fourth quarter; his falling-down body-twisting pick was one of the more athletic moves I've seen lately, and on this day served as a death-knell for all those wearing red  ( maybe that's why Papa John's looked like Commonwealth Stadium an hour before kick-off, after the INT ).

An additional trend reversal that occurred Sunday; Kentucky's secondary allowed only precious few yards after the catch.  The reason for that is the fact that UK's defensive backs and safeties are experienced ( except for Jones ), and they all possess great speed.  Their ability to anticipate the throw was also on display, which added to the considerable difficulties Mr. Cantwell was experiencing.  Even though U of L's receivers and quarterback are inexperienced, I'm still looking forward to seeing how UK's secondary performs against SEC competition; I think a few folks are going to be unpleasantly surprised ( I'm talking to you 'Visor' ).   

Defensive devastation on this day, but can we expect this type of performance week-in and week-out?  After-all, U of L is breaking in a new quarterback ( anybody want to rethink that Unitas Award watch list ), and the Card receivers are greener than Hank Hill's lawn.  The Louisville running backs came into the contest as being a potential bright spot in U of L's offense, but they are also young and inexperienced.  So what is one to take away from this impressive display?  Is UK's defense that good, or was their performance a product of U of L's youth?

I suspect, after watching a tape of the game, that UK's defense is going to be as good as advertised.  But, I have no expectations that they will be as overpowering every week as they were Sunday.  The offenses that UK will face in the future, in particular in the SEC, are much more polished, experienced, and blessed with more speed and beef up front.  But, hey, not a bad way to start the season.

On an A to F grading scale, the defense gets an A+.

The offense 

I thought, considering the play calling and Mike Hartline's youth, that he did what was asked of him, and he didn't hurt his teams chance at victory with mistakes.  Even though Hartline was only 16 -31 ( zero interceptions ) through the air, a closer look at the statistics reveals a slightly better performance:

• Of his 15 incompletion's, six were not his fault; Kyrus Lanxter dropped a pass at the U of L 11 yard line because he tried to run with the ball before he caught the ball ( for those of you new to football this is just the opposite of what he's supposed to do ).
• Lanxter missed a perfectly thrown fade in the corner of the end zone; this would have been a terrific catch, but the ball was thrown where only Lanxter could catch it, and Joker likes his fades thrown short.
• Hartline had to throw away three balls due to excellent coverage, or because a defensive lineman was in his face ( the end zone toss- away which resulted in a safety was a no-brainer; Hartline either throws the ball away, or takes a hit ). 
• DeMoreo Ford had a drop. 

Hartline did not play perfectly, of course; he overthrew a wide open T. C. Drake in the flat on the first play of the second quarter, which would have resulted in a touchdown.  He overthrew Drake again, by a yard or so, with a long pass into the end zone ( Drake had his man beat by a step ).  And he overthrew an open John Connor in the first series of the second half, which would have resulted in first down. 

Hartline had this to say about UK's offensive performance:

"Our whole ( offensive ) game plan was not to do anything stupid, was to take care of the ball and when we had opportunities, to try to take advantage.  We played smart ball today."

I tend to agree with him.  UK had only one turnover ( a Tony Dixon fumble ), and although Hartline's numbers are not awe-inspiring, he did what was asked by Phillips and Brooks. 

Conversely, one troubling aspect of the offenses performance came on this series with 10:00 minutes left in the game, and UK up only 13 - 2:

1st down on U of L's 12 yard line -- Derrick Locke up the middle for no gain,  2nd down -- Locke up the middle, hit for a three yard loss, 3rd and 13 -- Hartline complete to T. C. Drake for an eight yard gain.

That particular series was a microcosm of the games play calling.  I certainly understand, and do not question Joker Phillips and Rich Brooks wanting to be conservative with the offensive game plan on this day.  But, I think that trying to get Locke or Alfonso Smith out on the edges would have been a more successful choice.  After the way that UK's offensive line was inexplicably handled by U of L all day long, and with the speed UK's backs possess, running to the corners just seems logical. 

Not to pile on UK's O-line, but keep in mind when reviewing UK's 1.9 yards per carry average ( resulting in 63 net rush yards ), that the backs were hit either in the backfield, or within one yard of the line of scrimmage on 15 of 31 rush attempts ( yes, I counted ).  The three primary ball-carriers, Tony Dixon, Locke and Smith combined for 28 carries for 74 yards.  If before the game someone would have told me that would happen, I would have responded with rolling eyes.  But the joke would have been on me.  The offensive line simply MUST play better.  They have one month until Alabama, after that, things could get ugly for the 'big uglies'  who occupy space in front of Hartline. 

The key to this teams success ( i.e. 7 wins ) is the running game, because the defense will not ALWAYS be the game-winning unit.  Holding Georgia, Florida and Steve Spurrier to single-digit points will be nearly impossible, so at some point UK will have to score some offensive touchdowns, and all that begins with the front four opening up some running lanes.  Which is something they did not do Sunday.

Overall, gaining only 210 total yards is not good, regardless of how one spins the number.  But there is definitely talent on that side of the ball, it's just young.  Hopefully with some experience, and confidence which can be gained over the next three games, they will improve enough to be competitive versus the elite of the SEC.

To end the offensive review on a positive note; freshman Randall Cobb is very good when he has the ball in his hands.  He led the team with three receptions for 31 yards, and showed why he is being raved about by all around him.  He seems to have huge, soft hands, and he is very quick.  I envision him being used more and more as Hartline evolves as a quarterback.  My crystal ball says he will be special.

Offense grade -- C-

Special teams

After the defensive performance, the special teams play was UK's saving grace; both Tim Masthay and Ryan Tydlacka punted the ball exceptionally well.  Masthay averaged 42.8 yards on four punts, and Tydlacka averaged 41.7 yards on three punts ( Masthay's kick-off after the safety, from the twenty yard line to the two yard line, most decidedly a 'wow' moment ).  UK won the field position battle largely off the power of the two punter's legs, with U of L starting a drive in UK's territory only three times.  If Kentucky continues to play in close games ( and you know they will ), the importance of solid punting will continue to be at the top of UK's must-do list.

Also contributing to the special teams success:

• Dicky Lyons played mostly marvelously on special teams, except for fair-catching a ball he didn't catch, resulting in a 50 yard punt for U of L, and lost yardage for UK ( about 15 ).  Lyons caught six punts for 64 yards.  Many of those yards coming after the funky Lyons juked his pursuers, leaving them tackling air. 
• Lones Seiber did what was asked of him.  He made two short field goals ( missing a 49 yard attempt ), and all of his point after tries.  Coming off of a rough ending to last year, Seiber needs to get and maintain is confidence in order for UK to have every chance at victory.
• Freshman Matt Roark recorded a tipped field goal attempt. 

Overall an excellent effort by the special teams.

Special teams grade -- A

Final Analysis

A 27 -2 demoralizing of ones hated rival is never a bad thing.  And in the end, that's what matters.  UK won the game convincingly, in the fourth quarter, where over the last couple of years UK has dominated ( finally, a continuing trend of a positive nature ).  They won despite being very conservative on offense, and having to rely on a host of young receivers.  

Additionally, I think this was the first step in the education of Mike Hartline, and if Hartline is as smart as he seems, then I feel his quarterbacking abilities will catch up with his intelligence.  I look forward to watching him 'grow up' before our very eyes.  

Thanks for reading, and Go 'Cats!  

Mike at Card Chronicle has produced this outstanding post analyzing the Governor's Cup game this Sunday.  I cannot hope to match his much more in-depth knowledge of the pigskin game, and it also hurts that I only got to listen to about the last 30 minutes of the Governor's Cup game last year (but that turned out to be the most important part).  But even given those handicaps, I can hopefully come up with some answers a la Jeopardy to the questions many Wildcat fans should be asking.

So with no further ado, let's play Governor's Cup Jeopardy!

Category:  Kentucky -- Answer:  Randall Cobb

Question:  Who is the Kentucky freshman most likely to make an instant impact on the offense?

Cobb is a multi-dimensional talent who can play football.  He can throw, he can catch and he can run.  He will see the field somewhere, and he will make an impact on Kentucky's offense.

Category:  Louisville -- Answer:  Bilal Powell

Question:  Who is the Louisville player the Kentucky defense will have the most trouble containing?

Powell is a converted defensive back who came into his own last year against Rutgers, with 13 carries for 91 yards.  Powell is an extraordinary athlete that can be devastating once he gets past the line of scrimmage.  He is inexperienced, but his raw ability is frightening.

Category:  Kentucky/Spelling -- Answer:  T-R-E-V-A-R-D

Question:  How do you spell the first name of the Wildcat most likely to pick off Hunter Cantwell?

We all know that Trevard Lindley has truly developed into one of the best cover corners in the SEC, and against Louisville's relatively green receiving corps, he should be a wolf among sheep.  No disrespect to Louisville, but balls thrown in Lindley's direction are not going to result in good things.

Category:  Louisville -- Answer:  "L" no.

Question:  Will the "Red Out" at Papa John's Cardinal Stadium make any difference at all?

No further comment necessary.

Category:  Kentucky -- Answer:  Micah Johnson

Question:  Who will lead the Kentucky defense in tackles on Sunday?

Micah Johnson is one of the most highly-touted recruits to ever don the Blue and White on defense.  Johnson was ranked #36 in the Rivals 100 as a recruit, and is a phenomenal athlete who loves to hit opposing players at high speed.  Johnson has been brought along gradually at Kentucky, but now he is ready for his coming-out party, and Louisville (who also heavily recruited him) looks like where it will happen.

Category:  Louisville -- Answer:  One

Question:  How many of the Louisville wide receivers likely to play on Sunday have ever caught a pass in a college game?

Forget proven -- Louisville has exactly one wide receiver likely to play on Sunday who has ever caught a pass in college, and that player is Chris Vaughn.  Vaughn is a senior who saw his first action last year (a tribute to the depth and skill of Louisville's receiving corps over the past few years) and caught 2 passes for 11 yards last year.  Not exactly Harry Douglas or Mario Urrutia.

As a side note, Trent Guy, who is a proven receiver recovering from a gunshot wound to the back this summer, is currently listed 3rd on the depth chart.  He could show up in the game, although I think most followers of football from both schools think it best if he wait a game or two longer before getting back into the action.

Category:  Kentucky -- Answer:  Two

Question:  How many of the Kentucky receivers likely to play on Sunday have ever caught a pass in a college game?

Unless DeMoreo Ford plays, only Dicky Lyons Jr. has ever caught a pass in college.  But Dicky has caught roughly six times more (128) by himself than the entire Louisville receiving corps including Trent Guy.

Lyons will be the #1 target for Hartline on Sunday without any doubt, so Louisville will be all over him.  That will give Kyrus Lanxter (who now looks ready to go), E.J. Adams (a converted DB) and the freshmen, Matt Roark, Eric Adeyemi and Gene McCaskill a chance to shine.

Category:  Louisville/Spelling -- Answer:  W-O-O-D-N-Y

Question:  How do you spell the first name of the Cardinal player most likely to pick off a Kentucky pass?

Woodny Turenne was a Rivals 5*, #1 ranked player out of junior college.  Like Micah Johnson, Turenne is a superb athlete with serious size and speed.  He will be a tough match up for any of Kentucky's receivers.  Turenne is quite possibly the most talented football player on either of the two squads.

Category:  Governor's Cup -- Answer:  1997 and 1998

Question:  What is the last time Kentucky beat Louisville back-to-back years?

Of course, those were the heyday of Hal Mumme and the "Air Raid" offense led by the mighty Tim Couch.  Unfortunately, that turned out to be fool's gold for Kentucky and led to 7 Louisville victories in the last 9 years, with last year's game breaking a streak of 4 in a row by Louisville, the longest such streak enjoyed by either team since the renewal of the annual game.

Category:  Governor's Cup -- Answer:  Unknown

Question:  Who will be the victor in this year's Governor's Cup game?

Who knows?  On paper, it looks to me like Kentucky has an advantage on the defensive line, linebackers, wide receivers, running backs and the kicking game.  Louisville has an advantage at quarterback and home field, which are two big ones.

The questions surrounding the young UK offense will be answered only in the game.  Louisville's defense was much-maligned last year, but should be better at least when it comes to defending the vertical game.  Underneath, Louisville has a whole new set of linebackers, but does Kentucky have the pass catchers to exploit that potential weakness?

Much has been made of the fact that the winner of the ground game usually wins the contest.  That would seem to favor Kentucky with their 4-deep stable of backs, but as the first scrimmage proved, the offensive line must step up for the backs to be effective.  In the final analysis, there are simply too many unknowns, so we'll just have to wait and see.

It seems everyone, from the good folks in Las Vegas, to the local and national media, are picking against the 'Cats in their upcoming epic battle for the Governor's Cup.  I suppose I can understand why the knee-jerk reaction is to pick Louisville to win this years contest.  After-all, the game is being played at Papa John's Cardinal Stadium, and UK will be starting an unproven quarterback.  Add the fact that Kentucky lacks experience at the receiver slot, except for the talented Dicky Lyons, and one can reasonably assess the game as a U of L lean.  But if one analyzes the contest and a few key personnel a bit closer, a converse conclusion can easily be arrived upon.

I like Eric Crawford.  The Courier-Journal sports columnist is generally not dogmatic, that is, he backs up his opinions with some form of fact.  As is true with anyone who puts out opinions three or four times a week, I don't always agree with his assertions, but I don't always agree with any writer's opinions 100% of the time.  

This past Sunday Mr. Crawford penned a fairly even-handed column in which he put forth his prediction for the UK v. U of L game, along with his reasoning for reaching his final conclusion.  His logic seems to follow that of most of the national media, as well as some local media members, concerning the game and its possible outcome.  Because of this I am going to use his column, and his points, as the basis for my rebuttal to those who opine that U of L will come out victorious Sunday evening.

His assertions begin with an historical perspective:

"And the biggest one ( reason ) is the way UK historically has played in its season opener under Rick Brooks, which is to say, not at all well."

"Brooks has never beaten U of L in an opener.  But more than that, in four years of playing the Cardinals in the first game, his UK teams have managed just one first-quarter touchdown.  And they weren't facing blockbuster U of L defenses, either." 

 Well, that's a shocker.  In Brooks' first two years on the job UK went a combined 6 - 17.  Those teams were ... I'm being kind here ... terrible.  Of course they didn't play well in the first game, they didn't play well in ANY game.  But, in Brooks third season UK went 3 - 8, and almost managed to upset the Cards, losing only 31 - 24.  If not for an Andre' Woodson fumble on the U of L two yard line, that game could have very easily swung the other way. 

There is no denying that Louisville has had, previous to last season, a far superior team over the last several years.  Using UK's poor performances in some of those games as a yardstick by which to measure this years game is flawed logic.  Actually it's not flawed logic, the assertion lacks logic altogether.  One has nothing whatsoever to do with the other.

He next confronts the all important ground game:

"For eight straight years, the winning team's top rusher out-gained the entire opposing team.  Rafael Little did that last year."

"Because both teams figure to use multiple backs, that streak might be in jeopardy.  But let's say that UK's defensive line -- it best unit -- stuffs the U of L run.  Now the Wildcats are free to try to control things with their own running game, something their talented backfield is capable of doing.  But they can do that only if they can keep U of L honest through the air, and that's a shaky proposition."

 Can UK keep Louisville's defense honest through the air?  Finally, a legitimate point from Mr. Crawford.

Considering U of L returns eight starters from last years porous defense, I think it's fair to evaluate the job they did last year pressuring the passer: Last season Louisville recorded 17 sacks in 12 games, to go along with seven interceptions ( they also allowed 25 touchdown passes, and 251 yards per game through the air ).  Not fear inspiring numbers, even if Mike Hartline has yet to start a single college game.  UK's experienced offensive line figures to be inundated with blitz's and stunts all day long, and their ability to handle the Cards pass rushers ( U of L will be starting three new linebackers ) will go a long way in determining how effective Hartline is in the vertical game.

To offset Hartline's inexperience I'm sure Rich Brooks and Joker Phillips will utilize the pass catching abilities of the running backs.  Tony Dixon, Alfonso Smith, and Derrick Locke should prove to be valuable 'relief valves' for a pressured Hartline.  Getting those guys loose in the secondary is of vital importance to UK's offensive attack, but if U of L proves quick to cover and swarm ( which they didn't do last year ) then Kentucky's offense could become one dimensional.  Which of course would be problematic for the boys in blue.

Kentucky's inexperienced receiving corps is the wild card in this game, as far as the 'Cats are concerned.  Hartline will be relying on receivers Dicky Lyons, Kyrus Lanxter, E.J. Adams, Eric Adeyemi, Eugene McCaskill, and Matt Roark to run the right routes, and make the catch.  Tight end Maurice Grinter will also be relied upon to make a few catches.  Grinter, who is a terrific athlete, has very soft hands and has demonstrated an ability to catch, and then make yards after the catch with his speed, and willingness to plow through defenders.  Back-up tight end T. C. Drake has only one career catch ( for a TD ), but will also be an important target for Hartline to aim for. 

Is hoping for UK's passing game to keep the defense honest through the air too much to ask for?  Not if the receivers are asked to run intermediate routes of 15 - 20 yards.  Hartline's accuracy with the deep ball is shaky at this point, but he can make the nice throw over the middle.  Couple that with the running backs catching balls in the flat, and Kentucky's passing game should be adequate.

So to answer Mr. Crawford's question, yes, I feel that Kentucky's passing game will be strong enough to open up the running lanes for the trio of stud backs ( quartet if one includes Moncell Allen ).  If U of L stacks eight men in the box in an attempt to stuff the run, they'll pay the price all day long.

Crawford then moves to Hunter Cantwell:

"The Cardinals, meanwhile, have one thing in the game that might be most important, experience at quarterback."

Louisville does boast a more experienced signal-caller.  The former walk-on and Paducah Tilghman grad, when called upon, has played well for the Cards over the last three years. My concern though, if I were a U of L fan, is who he has played against.

His career stats look like this: 92 - 157 for 1,419 yards, with 10 touchdowns, and seven interceptions.  He has four career starts.

Cantwell's finest hour came in Louisville's '05 Gator Bowl loss to Virginia Tech.  He threw for 216 yards and three touchdowns, earning game Co-MVP honors.  But other than that game, Cantwell's numbers have been achieved against less-than-stellar competition:

• 2005 versus a 5 - 6 UConn team: 16 - 25 for 271 yards and one touchdown.
• 2006 versus a 7 - 6 Kansas State team: 18 - 26 for 173 yards, one touchdown and one interception.
• 2006 versus a 7 - 6 Middle Tennessee State team: 17 - 32 for 340 yards, one touchdown and one interception. 

Those three games account for over half of Cantwell's career yardage ( 784 of 1,419 yards ). 

In all of those games he also had either Mike Bush ( UConn ),  Mario Urrutia ( all three ), Harry Douglas ( all three ), Kolby Smith ( K-State and MTSU ), or Joshua Tinch ( UConn ) running for him, or catching his passes.  This year he has no such weapons available.  With the dismissal of receiver JaJuan Spillman, the near tragic shooting of receiver Trent Guy ( he will probably play at some point this year ), and the broken foot of receiver Scott Long, Cantwell is left with zero receivers who have caught a pass in a college game ( and you thought UK had wide-out issues ).

I think Cantwell is a fine quarterback, but his accomplishments need to be put into perspective.

Crawford wraps up his analysis with this:

"UK has the better defense, and probably the better running game.  It should also have a special-teams advantage.  And unlike in past years, the speed factor is beginning to turn in UK's favor."

"But U of L has Cantwell, home field and perhaps more urgency, certainly more pressure to win."

"UK has ... probably the better running game." -- I nominate Eric for the 'Understatement of the Year Pulitzer'.  PROBABLY, he's right. 

Although U of L does boast Brock Bolen at running back ( 456 career yards and a 5.2 yards per carry average ), Kentucky's abundance of talented backs should prove to be a huge advantage, especially if the game is tight in the fourth quarter ( which I think it will be ).

Basically Crawford, as well as many others, are basing their prognostications on Cantwell's abilities, and U of L's "pressure to win."  The whole "pressure to win" contention is a bogus argument; I bet Ohio State felt "pressure to win" the last two national championship games, but they were disemboweled in both.  In my view, one reaches for "pressure to win" when one has no other bullets.  

If one notices, Crawford only mentions UK's defense as an afterthought.  That is a monumental mistake, in my opinion.  With UK's defensive line and linebackers pressuring Cantwell, and UK's superb secondary covering the inexperienced U of L receivers, I feel that Kentucky's defense will be the difference maker in this game.  Keep in mind,  it's difficult to throw from ones backside, and it's hard to throw to blanketed receivers. 

I can see only two areas where Louisville will have the advantage Sunday: at quarterback, and having home field advantage.  But remember, the quarterback advantage may be offset by UK's defensive pressure, and U of L's lack of any experience at the receiver spot.  There's not a lot Rich Brooks can do about the home field advantage.  But, knowing U of L fans proclivity to run for the exits when things seem bleak, if UK can race to a lead, the home field may be rendered moot.

Crawford ends with a prediction: 31 - 21, Louisville.  He offers up a disclaimer, though:

"But I make that pick with all of the confidence I have in my lottery numbers."

I agree.  Rivalry games, especially early season rivalry games, can be very unpredictable, and with the profusion of question marks masquerading as players, this years contest is laborious to handicap. 

My prediction?  Well, that's gonna have to wait until Friday.

Thanks for reading, 'Believe in Blue', and BEAT LOUISVILLE!

Twenty days and counting from the big season-opening showdown with Louisville, it's time to take stock and see where we are.  This evaluation is a snapshot in time, only, and just a general feeling of where both teams seem to be.

Unlike last year, neither Louisville nor Kentucky are highly regarded.  Both teams have lost their starting quarterback and star receivers.  There are lots of question marks on both sides, so I thought I would add them up just a bit.  Today, we'll begin with the offense.

Both Kentucky and Louisville have lost star quarterbacks and receivers.  Louisville has an advantage at quarterback in that they have an heir apparent to Brohm in Hunter Cantwell out of Paducah Tilghman.  Kentucky has now tapped Michael Hartline for the job, but Cantwell is much more proven in college competition than Hartline.  Louisville has to be considered to have a clear edge at this position.

In the backfield, Louisville has 6'0", 230# bruiser Brock Bolen (gotta love alliterative "tough guy" names like that) who is returning from an injury-riddled junior year, but is extremely capable.  Joining him in the backfield is Bilal Powell, George Stripling and Joe Tronzo.

Kentucky, however, has a stable of SEC-proven backs four or five deep.  Alfonso Smith, Derrick Locke, Moncell Allen, Tony Dixon and John Conner are all proven players.  Kentucky has a clear edge in the running back position.

At the receiver position, both teams bring back very little in the way of returning talent.  Virtually none of Louisville's receivers have ever made any kind of measurable impact on a college game.  Kentucky has one proven returning wideout in the charismatic Dicky Lyons Jr. and a couple of guys in Kyrus Lanxter and DeMoreo Ford who are experienced, but are currently injured.  Slight advantage to Kentucky.

On the offensive line, both teams lost talented tight ends, but Kentucky returns much more experience overall.  Louisville must replace three starters on the interior line, as well as their tight end, and Kentucky must replace only two, and Kentucky has the more experienced depth.  Advantage -- Wildcats.

And now, as Paul Harvey likes to say, it's time for news:

Kentucky

• UK's Cobb might be needed at QB (Herald-Leader)
• Cats QB Hartline ready for spotlight (Herald-Leader)
• Kentucky's Hartline eager to prove he belongs (NCAAFootball.com)
• UK football coaches high on freshman receivers (Herald-Leader)
• Now a safety, Lentz makes the cut on defense (Courier-Journal)
• Mossakowski: The Impact (UK Wildcat Country)
• UK rookie Smith moves to center (WKYT)

Louisville

• His feet wet, Beaumont can now dive in  (Courier-Journal)
• John Clay: Cardinals plan to surprise skeptics (Herald-Leader)
• Louisville's Guy anxious to move on after shooting (Herald-Leader)
• Not easy being green (Courier-Journal)
• Cardinals look Made in Louisville (Courier-Journal)

This is the fifth in a series of posts which will break down the '08 football Cats.  Today we break down the receivers.

As with the linebacker corps and the running backs, UK's receiver brigade will be relying on some new faces to replace two very talented graduating players.  The loss of Keenan Burton and Steve Johnson severely impacts a position that has been very strong for the Cats for several years.  Last year alone the two terrific wide-outs accounted for 126 catches, which were good for 1,782 yards and 22 touchdowns.  Their individual career numbers are as follows:

• Burton -- 2,376 yards ( second to Craig Yeast in UK history ), 25 touchdowns ( also second to Craig Yeast in UK history ).  Burton's 16 touchdown catches his junior year tops the UK record books for most TD receptions in a single season. 
• Johnson -- 1,200 yards receiving in only two years, topped off with 1,040 yards last year.  He scored 14 TD's in his career, with 13 coming last year, which is good for the third most TD's in a single season by a receiver in Kentucky history. 

Burton and Johnson are two of only four receivers in UK history to amass 1,000+ receiving yards in a single season ( joining Yeast and James Whalen ).  Even more  important than eating up yardage, the two also made big play after big play:

• Johnson broke the hearts of Card fans with his 57 yard game-winning touchdown last year, his second TD of the game.  In the '08 Music City Bowl Johnson caught the game clinching TD with 5:19 left in the game versus Florida State.  He also scored the game winning TD against LSU last year, catching a 7 yard toss in the third overtime.  Last year versus Tennessee Johnson brought UK within three points with his 8 yard TD grab with 6:11 left to go in regulation, his second TD of the day.
• Burton scored a game-clinching 22 yard touchdown with 4:02 left  versus Arkansas, which put the all-important UL follow-up game in the books as a victory.  He also had two huge touchdowns versus Tennessee last year.

Both players exhibited tremendous leadership through their hard work off of the field, and great performance on the field.  Their numbers will be sorely missed, but the example they set for the younger players will be missed just as much. 

The Replacements

Dicky Lyons 5'11", 190 lb senior -- 56 catches, 655 yards, and 7 TD's last year.  For his career Lyons has 108 catches for 1,488 yards and 16 touchdowns.  Lyons is the clear leader to be the number one option for UK at the receiver position in '08. 

The senior has displayed an uncanny ability to get open, and elude after the catch.  His bravado and self assuredness sometimes rubs his head coach the wrong way, but he backs up his overactive vocal cords with results.  As an example; two years ago versus Mississippi State, UK was coming off of a beat-down administered by LSU in Death Valley ( 49-0 ).  Lyons proclaimed the following week that he "guaranteed" Kentucky would beat MSU.  Brooks cringed, and probably yelled a bit, but Lyons backed up his talk with one of the best touchdown catches I have ever seen; a back-of-the-end zone, one-handed, toeing the line, circus catch for six.  His talent has never been in question, this year though the coaching staff and his younger teammates are looking for more from the Louisiana native. 

Offensive Coordinator Joker Phillips had this to say about Lyons in the spring:

"I've challenged Dicky this summer.  I've challenged him to bring our young guys up to speed on the offense and what they need to do.  I told him that will only help his game, because if we can get some help outside, teams won't be able to double him."

If there was ever an indispensable player, it is Lyons, this year.  Not only for his on-the-field production, but as Phillips has stated, his leadership.  The group of players backing up the starters ( heck, one may start ) are all very young and inexperienced.  Lyons is the only player available with extensive real life experience playing receiver in the SEC, against some of the fastest defensive backs in the country.  His input, and positive example are needed in order for UK to continue to grow terrific wide-outs.

DeMoreo Ford 5'10", 186 lb senior -- 7 catches for 47 yards in '07.  For his career Ford has made 20 catches for 236 yards and 2 touchdowns.  He is currently rehabbing a torn patella tendon.  According to the coaches he is on schedule to return for fall camp, with the possibility of returning to full contact drills by mid-to-late camp.

Although Ford has not been on the receiving end of many passes in his three years on the gridiron, he has played extensively over the last two years: He caught a 70 yard touchdown pass in the Music City Bowl two years ago versus Clemson, showing off his ability to make yards after the catch, which is something the younger group of receivers have not done as of yet.

Ford returning to full speed is vitally important to the '08 passing game.  His knowledge of the playbook, and experience make him invaluable when considering the lack of the aforementioned attributes in the other receiver candidates. 

Kyrus Lanxter 6'3", 180 lb sophomore -- 1 catch for 6 yards in five games. 

Lanxter arrived at UK as a highly regarded recruit, but with the plethora of talented receivers last year, he did not see much playing time. This year though, the opportunity for Lanxter to make an impact is most certainly present.  Lanxter is currently listed as the second receiver at one of the two wide-out spots behind DeMoreo Ford.  Considering Ford's injury, and the lack of experience behind him, Lanxter will have ample opportunity to gain a starting position.

Lanxter was 1st Team All-State in Tennessee both his junior and senior years at Alcoa High School.  His senior year he caught 27 passes for 888 yards ( that's an incredible 32.9 yards per catch ), and 16 touchdowns.  He was also MVP of the State Championship game as a senior, posting 6 catches for 173 yards and 2 touchdowns in his teams win.  He was rated one of the Top 25 prospects in Tennessee by Rivals.com.  Like many of his comrades at the receiver spot he was a track star, running a 21.9 in the 200 meters.

Lanxter's speed is not in question, but his ability to gain yards after the catch has been brought into question.  Coach Brooks had this to say about Lanxter's struggles in this area:

"I was joking with Kyrus telling him that it looks like every time he catches the ball, it paralyzes his legs."

It's one thing to have great speed, it's another to know how to use that speed.  With the help of his older teammates and the coaching staff, Lanxter should be able to overcome his inexperience and thrive in the Wildcat's offense.

Anthony Mosley 6'0", 170 lb  redshirt freshman -- Mosley didn't begin playing football until his junior year in high school.  His senior year he didn't drop one ball, according to his coach.  He also runs a 4.36 - 40.  Going into spring practice Mosley was listed second behind Dicky Lyons at one of the receiver spots.

Terrence Jones 6'2", 192 lb redshirt freshman -- Jones, an Atlanta native, was voted All-South Region by PrepStar.  He ran a 4.5 - 40, and is considered a physical receiver.  He is listed behind Anthony Mosley and Dicky Lyons at one of the receiver spots.

The True Freshman

Offensive Coordinator Joker Phillips had this to say about the incoming freshman receivers:

They are "as good a class of receivers as I've ever brought in.  There are 5 or 6 kids in that group who could potentially have an impact at the position."

 

Coach Brooks countered Phillips' remarks with this:

"You never know with freshman, whether they'll be mature enough to do what you need them to do."

Aah, the angst of a head coach, live and in color.  The following players will be granted the all important opportunity of grabbing playing time.  Which ones will be "mature enough" to handle the load?  Only time will tell.

Aaron Boyd 6'3", 210 lb freshman -- Boyd is the first four-star recruit since Micah Johnson in '06.  He is considered one of the elite receiver recruits in the country.  Boyd was rated the #18 player in the Midwest by Scout.com, and the #1 college prospect in Kentucky by both Scout and Rivals.com.  The Henry Clay product produced big numbers his senior year: 55 catches for 1,157 yards and 15 touchdowns.

Boyd was a fixture at spring practice, and he brings an aggressive attitude with him.  He had this to say about his expectations:

"I see an opportunity there ( receiver ) and I want to seize it.  Joker ( Phillips ) quizzed me a lot on what's going on, and I talked a lot with the other receivers.  I pretty much have the offense down pat.  I feel like I'm a step ahead of everybody else who will be coming in.  If we were to play tomorrow I feel like I could come in and contribute." 

The only real knock on Boyd is his speed; he was clocked in the 4.6 range in high school.  Boyd had this to say about those who question his wheels:

"I've been around a lot of NFL people ( Aaron's brother is former UK and current NFL quarterback Shane Boyd ), so I think my knowledge of the game will help me adjust.  I've got the size and strength, and Keenan Burton has worked with me on getting off the line, so I think that will be a strength as well.  As far as my speed, I've got good game speed, and once the coaches start working with me, I think I can get it ( 40 time ) down in the 4.4 range."   

Regarding Boyd's proclamation that he would like to catch "70 to 80" passes, and his four-star rating, head coach Rick Brooks had this to say about the talented freshman:

"He has the ability to be in the mix.  He's got to work hard.  He's got the tools, but he's got to work hard.  We'll see how all that plays out.  We've seen how a lot of people put pressure on a four-star guy saying, 'This guys going to be an immediate impact player', I don't like to do that to anybody, but he's got an opportunity."

"He's got an opportunity"; that may qualify as the understatement of the year.  Brooks and Phillips will take a long hard look at Boyd as the third receiver, but he has some strong competition for playing time. 

Randall Cobb 5'11", 180 lb freshman -- Cobb played quarterback at Alcoa High School ( where he was a teammate of Kyrus Lanxter ).  He was Tennessee's Mr. Football in Class AA.  He was named one of the Top 11 prospects in Tennessee by the Orlando Sentinel.  Rivals.com has Cobb rated as a Top 20 Tennessee prospect.  He is considered to be a superior athlete who rushed for 793 yards ( 9.0 yards per carry ) and 13 touchdowns in his senior year.

The biggest question surrounding Cobb is where to play him.  He was promised the opportunity to compete at the quarterback position, but he is realistic enough to know that UK is stocked at the position, although the question remains as to who will be the starter.  Cobb voiced his opinion on his possible playing time:

"I don't like sitting on the bench.  Curtis (Pulley ) and Mike ( Hartline ) are both good quarterbacks who are experienced, and it's going to take a lot of work to get to that level.  I just want to do whatever I can to get on the field and help our team win."

 Joker Phillips echoed those sentiments:

"He's going to play.  We've just got to figure our where."  Phillips continued, "He's a Keenan Burton-type worker, he's got a Keenan Burton-type attitude, and he's a Keenan Burton-type of athlete."

 The aforementioned Keenan Burton praised the youngster with these words:

"I've watched him in seven-on-seven drills, and he can play.  He seems like a humble guy that works hard, and that's better than a talented guy who doesn't."

Truer words have never been spoken. 

Even though Cobb last played receiver his sophomore year in high school, he has been getting instruction from Dicky Lyons and Kyrus Lanxter on his route running.  Cobb is considered the most athletic and versatile player on the squad, coupling that with his attitude and work ethic means keeping him off of the field will be a tough task.  It's also possible Cobb could see time on special teams returning kick.

E.J. Fields 6'2", 190 lb freshman -- Fields, a Frankfort High School product, was rated the #4 prospect in Kentucky by Rivals.com.  He was rated the #63 all-purpose athlete, and the #45 safety prospect by Scout.com.  In his illustrious high school career Fields ran for 2,677 yards and 39 touchdowns.  His senior year alone he amassed 1,400 yards rushing and 25 touchdowns.  He played both quarterback and corner-back.  He's been timed at 4.5 in the 40.  He's a three-time state champion in the 400-meters, and won the 200-meter state title his senior year.  He ran a 11.2 in the 100-meters.

With the receiver position being Olsen twin thin, Fields will probably be given the opportunity to earn a spot at one of the wide-outs.  He was recruited for the secondary, but his offensive skills, i.e. speed and elusiveness, dictate that he be given a shot at receiver.  As with Cobb, Fields is an incredibly athletic player who will see time on the field somewhere.

Eric Adeyemi 6'0", 165 lb freshman -- Adeyemi, a Miami, Florida native caught 31 passes for 455 yards and 4 touchdowns his senior year while operating in a run-first offense.  He was named All-Dade County, which is a great honor considering how talent rich that area is.  He's been timed running a sub-4.4 - 40, so he, like his receiver teammates brings tremendous speed with his game.  He won state championships in the 110-meter hurdles, and the 300-meter hurdles.

Adeyemi will be given a look at receiver this fall, but with a myriad of others fighting for spots, he may be relegated to learning, instead of performing on Saturdays.

Gene McCaskill 6'0", 175 lb freshman -- The Chester, S.C. athlete produced more than 2,500 yards passing, rushing and receiving, along with 30 touchdowns during his senior year.  He was named 1st Team All-State as as all-purpose performer.  He was named one of the Top 11 prospects in South Carolina by the Orlando Sentinel.  He played both quarterback and wide receiver.  He's been clocked running a sub-4.6 - 40.

McCaskill finds himself in a very similar position as Adeyemi; fighting for a chance to play, along with many others.  If he can gain some separation from his teammates he might see some game action, but if not, his freshman year may be a season of watching and learning.

Possible position switch

E.J. Adams 6'0", 190 lb junior -- Adams has been playing in UK's secondary for the last couple of years.  He snagged a huge interception ( which he ran back 49 yards ) on the goal line versus Vanderbilt two years ago, which secured the victory and bowl eligibility for UK.  He runs a 4.4 - 40, and boasts a 41-inch vertical leap.

With the secondary saturated with talent, the coaching staff felt like Adams could contribute at wide-out.  He made the switch in the spring and impressed the coaching staff by making several super plays.  He's another great athlete who's trying to find some playing time.  A good problem to have if your name in Rich Brooks, and a huge motivating factor if you're a player.  Adams will probably see time somewhere.  How much time and where, is yet to be determined.

Final Analysis

In the spring Phillips had this to say about the receivers:

"You might have five straight plays where you run down-field, but you've got to get back into that huddle and be ready to go.  We're getting into that ( fatigue ) a little bit right now.  If you run the wrong route, it throws the whole process off, and we've had way too many missed assignments.  We're working to get our guys mentally tougher."

  

Youth, the only cure is experience, which is why it is so important for Lyons and Ford to demonstrate all that it takes to be successful in the SEC.  The talent is apparent, but can the talent adjust to a faster game speed?  Can the talent adjust to the demands of the coaches?  Can the talent accept that they must get better in order to win?

All of those questions will be answered starting August 5th.  I certainly look for Lyons to be the #1 option for whomever the quarterback is, but as Phillips astutely pointed out to Lyons; if there is only one viable option at receiver, then that receiver will see a multitude of double and triple teams. 

Ford's ability to stretch the defense also is a huge factor in the passing game.  Lyons isn't blessed with blazing speed, so Ford is the only returning player with any experience who has the ability to give the opponents secondary pause, as far as the big play is concerned.  The health of his knee will be watched very closely by Cat fans.

In order for UK to enjoy winning weekends this year one or more of the youngsters will have to step up and demand playing time through their performance in practice.  Which player that will be, I don't know, but the talent is abundant.  Certainly Lanxter, Fields, and Boyd all possess the physical abilities, but will they excel in route running, as well as learning the intricacies of the offense in time to cash in on their athleticism? 

My bet is that at least one of those above mentioned players will have a big year.  UK's receiving corps has looked thin before, going into the season, but someone always surprises.  Two years ago it was Dicky Lyons, last year it was Steve Johnson, this year it will be ... I'm not that smart.

Trivia

Who holds the UK record for the most pass receptions in a single game?

I failed to ask a trivia question at the end of my running back preview, so here goes:

Which running back holds the UK record for most rushing touchdowns in a season?

Thanks for reading, and Josh Hamilton IS Roy Hobbs!