A comment/letter to John Gasaway
Great work you do for the game and helping folks put in perspective what matters statistically and otherwise in a game played on hardwood, but much better understood on paper. I've read you and other number-crunchers for a long time and (mostly) agree on your take. For a betting man, it's the only way to fly.
As a Catbird (my word for a Kentucky and Louisville fan), and a fan of the college game I grow more and more disgusted with the ignorance, hate, venom, hypocrisy, and irresponsible chest-thumping spewing forth from folks who ought to know better as it relates to issues like "one-and-done", or whether or not certain coaches are ruining the game (guess who?) by recruiting the nations top talent.
I mean, I was once a "student-athlete" and graduated from a fine University, later became employed, worked my way up from the bottom over the years, and eventually earned the experience and respect to become one of the top individuals in my industry. Somehow all that was factored into my choice of going to college versus working in the sheet metal factory which had held many of my summer vacations captive.
I loved college and everything it was about, especially sports, pot/beer and pussy. But, my ultimate goal from the git-go was that piece of paper (my degree) which admiringly adorns my closet today. I was convinced it was a ticket out of the blue collar world of which I had grown accustomed, and that it would someday pay its promised dividends in cold hard cash. I guess you could say I was about the dash, the grass, the crash, and the gash... but mainly the cash.
And although I won't go into how I really feel about the "state of the union" and it's proclivity of injustice for all, I do remember what I thought I knew about a country that espoused freedom, capitalism, equality, and the ability for each individual to choose their own destiny, and then try to make it happen.
Now, how is it that so many seemingly intelligent so-called Americans who grew up on the same diet of (propaganda) as myself feel comfortable assessing the decisions of one-and-done college players as somehow being "their" problem? I mean, if for example Eric Bledsoe doesn't read as well as you or I, is it his problem or ours? If he tests free agency at year's end and signs for $12 million a year, was it his opportunity, hard work, and talent that earned it, or ours? Is it his problem, or the Phoenix front office, or the fans who screamed to no avail to get him on contract before the deadline? So now, with his lunch pail in hand he goes to work ALONE every night and likely just earned a huge raise for an outstanding job.
You know Eric, it's true that problems can be seen as opportunities, huh?
So, if a kid and his coach agree that his (and likely his family's) best financial interest would be better served by leaving the team and going professional, even if after only one year of (that almighty holy grail) of higher education... who am I, or you, or anyone else to feel the need to weigh in NEGATIVELY on his own personal decision that he made based on the information available at the time?
In review, remember that I went to college to ultimately earn more money with my job being the caretaker of that goal. Don't we all? How many of us degreed princes make $12 million a year? Not many, and damn sure not me.
And what about that scoundrel of a coach who let him get only one year of schooling before shooing him off to future riches and fame? But then, why wouldn't the scoundrel want to keep him around for another year or two?
I would have, Hmmm...?
I realize that fans can be viciously jealous and many times jump on ANY opportunity to spin a situation to their liking. But folks like you (but not you) and the plethora of other so-called "experts" who blindly bandwagon without logic, reason, or considering another perspective are simply irresponsible mouth pieces who feed the delusional masses their daily dose of "what they want to hear". They sicken me with all their Doug Gottfried arrogance, who all of the sudden knows everything, but can't seem to ever pick a winner? Oh, good for TV, right.
It isn't the one-and-done ruination of CBB... it's the dumbass bloggers, announcers, and writers who are spinning this game into the stupidity garbage dump of hate. And all because they're too ignorant or chicken shit to speak the truth. It is the height of hypocrisy and the bane of our existence that we are spoon fed our beliefs without more careful analysis (much like what you, Ken, and Dean have championed over the last 5-10 years). I salute you in the name of OBJECTIVITY, Howard Roark.
Sure, there are ratings and networks and back room deals that suggest that a narrative of disagreement is good for the level of fan interest, thus network stock price, and thus the NCAA bank vault.
Can no one with an audience and a pair of balls ever stand up and tell it like it really is? Are we to listen to endless moronic red-faced Bobby Knight diatribes about situations of which he has no knowledge or experience with just because ESPN thinks he's good television? I can hear the back room snickers from my couch when he starts into his ramble-mania.
This talk of "ruining the game" is so ridiculously far-fetched that I have fits of lalochezia just hearing the CBS theme song, but then I mostly revert to a couch burning "tacenda". Smoldering...
John, I realize numbers are your game and this comment defies strapping it to a chart, and mapping it for visual appeal and understanding. Big data it ain't. But please, weigh in on this subject with all your objective intelligence so that the common fan can "get a grip" on this thing we commonly agree on as reality.
If you or anyone else happens to disagree with my position, so be it. I am happy to publicly debate the matter anywhere, anytime. But, be fore warned... I'll come loaded for bear.