DSS: Kentucky at Vanderbilt
Click here for an explanation of how the DSS is charted and what the ratings and box score represent.
The Kentucky Wildcats faced their biggest road challenge since playing at Indiana back in December and emerged with a big win against a determined Vanderbilt team. Defensively the game featured all the elements that we've come to expect from the Cats - excellent field goal defense and very few free throw attempts for the opponent along with a few forced turnovers and some not-so-great defensive rebounding (particularly in the first half).
Calipari wanted the Cats to force Vanderbilt to the interior and in the first half that seemed to be what the Commodores wanted to do to as they repeatedly dumped the ball inside to Festus Ezeli. Anthony Davis played well (also, water is wet) and the other Cats applied considerable pressure on the perimeter to force tough shots from that area. The result was a terrific defensive stand in the first half that saw Vanderbilt struggle to a 76.7 Offensive Efficiency.
In the second half the Cats backed off the swarming defense that marked the first half and the Commodores were able to knock down some long 3's that included a 10 possession stretch early in the second half where they went 4 of 5 from distance. That got them back in the game, but the rest of the half was marked by spotty shooting and an inability to string together perimeter shots thanks to the Cats' defensive pressure. In the second half the Commodores offensive efficiency improved considerably to 129.0. They were held scoreless over their last 7 possessions though when UK put the game away.
| Kentucky | Defense Box Score: Kentucky vs Vanderbilt | ||||||||||||
| Name | Min | FGM | FGA | 3PTM | 3PTA | FTM | FTA | Def Rb | Blocks | TO | Steals | Points | Fouls |
| T. Jones | 30 | 2.5 | 7.34 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 3 |
| M. Kidd-Gilchrist | 30 | 5.5 | 13.33 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 1.84 | 1 | 14 | 3 |
| A. Davis | 39 | 5.5 | 17 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 2.83 | 0 | 12 | 3 |
| D. Lamb | 37 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 |
| M. Teague | 37 | 3.5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 8 | |
| D. Miller | 15 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| K. Wiltjer | 12 | 0 | 1.33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1.33 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Undefended | 40 | 5 | 9 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 14 | |||
| Totals | 200 | 23 | 63 | 8 | 21 | 9 | 14 | 25 | 12 | 10 | 4 | 63 | 16 |
- Doron Lamb gets a block that he wasn't credited for in the official box score - it was given to Michael Kidd-Gilchrist instead, even though MKG wasn't really involved in defending the shot. This happens from time to time.
- One particular bit of bad defensive rebounding came from Darius Miller on the possession where he "fouled" John Jenkins on a 3pt attempt. Prior to that he was out on Jeff Taylor when Taylor missed a long 2, but instead of turning and blocking out Taylor (and getting the ball which bounced right back to him), Miller let himself drift upcourt. There were some other instances of poor effort/blockout, but this one stuck out for me.
- Anthony Davis was once again heavily involved in defending shots. A good bit of that is the matchup with Ezeli, but Davis also roamed the court as he typically does and helped out on other players. On top of everything else he led the team in forced turnovers.
- I loved Kyle Wiltjer's activeness on defense which manifested in this game by helping to force turnovers in his limited minutes.
- I don't know who (if anyone) defended Jenkins on his first 3 point make due to ESPN's technical difficulties, so I tagged it as an "Undefended" shot.
| Kentucky | Four Factors | Ratings | |||||||||
| Name | Opp eFG% | Opp TO% | FTRate | DRb% | Stops | Scores | Plays | Stop% | DPoss% | Def Rtg | Opp Eff |
| K. Wiltjer | 0.0 | 54.6 | 150.4 | 7.9 | 2.4 | 0.0 | 2.4 | 1.00 | 0.13 | 89.5 | 0.0 |
| D. Miller | 0.0 | 0.0 | 133.3 | 12.7 | 2.1 | 1.0 | 3.1 | 0.69 | 0.13 | 99.2 | 65.5 |
| D. Lamb | 14.3 | 17.6 | 28.6 | 5.1 | 3.7 | 2.0 | 5.7 | 0.66 | 0.10 | 101.0 | 70.5 |
| A. Davis | 32.4 | 20.1 | 5.9 | 9.8 | 8.1 | 6.0 | 14.1 | 0.58 | 0.24 | 102.2 | 85.1 |
| M. Kidd-Gilchrist | 48.8 | 13.4 | 7.5 | 22.2 | 7.8 | 6.0 | 13.7 | 0.57 | 0.30 | 102.7 | 101.9 |
| T. Jones | 40.9 | 11.0 | 54.5 | 15.9 | 5.1 | 3.9 | 9.1 | 0.57 | 0.20 | 102.9 | 99.4 |
| M. Teague | 80.0 | 26.5 | 0.0 | 7.7 | 4.0 | 3.5 | 7.5 | 0.54 | 0.13 | 104.0 | 106.2 |
| Undefended | 77.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.4 | 1.6 | 5.0 | 6.6 | 0.25 | 0.11 | 111.2 | 211.1 |
| Totals | 42.9 | 16.4 | 22.2 | 59.5 | 35.0 | 27.3 | 62.2 | 0.56 | 103.3 | ||
- Kyle Wiltjer had a nice game defensively. He mostly guarded Lance Goulbourne, but he did switch off to Ezeli a few times and held his ground fairly well. All in all he continues to make good progress on this end of the floor.
- Prior to picking up his 3rd foul, MKG did a fantastic job defending Jeff Taylor. After his 3rd foul Taylor took advantage until Cal switched Lamb onto him and MKG to Jenkins. That helped bottle both guys up a bit until late in the game when MKG switched back to Taylor.
- Marquis Teague did a really nice job defending Brad Tinsley.
As I did for the Florida game, here is a rough partitioning of 3 point attempts based on whether they were open, semi-open, or closely guarded (doesn't include Jenkins' first made 3).
| Vanderbilt | Made | Missed | Perc. |
| Open | 3 | 2 | 60.0 |
| Semi Open | 2 | 4 | 33.3 |
| Guarded | 2 | 7 | 22.2 |
| Kentucky | Made | Missed | Perc. |
| Open | 2 | 2 | 50.0 |
| Semi Open | 0 | 4 | 0.0 |
| Guarded | 1 | 4 | 20.0 |
Kentucky's threes were mostly pretty good shots - open or semi-open and taken in rhythm by guys you want to take them (Lamb and Miller). Teague and MKG both forced a few when they didn't need to and that could possibly be an issue in a close game, but otherwise the Cats are pretty good at picking their spots. Sometimes shots just don't go down and I think that was the case in this game.
One other non-UK defensive note: I really don't think the zone was all that great in stopping the Cats from getting good shots - MKG, Terrence Jones, and Miller repeatedly got to the middle and either got a good mid-range attempt or kicked the ball out for a step-into-it 3 pointer - the shots just didn't go in. I really think the idea of "The zone can slow Kentucky down" idea is more myth than reality at this point in the season. The Cats can still get good shots against zones, it just takes a few more seconds for them to do it.
12 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Excellent work as always.
Wow, I am surprised to see that Teague guarded Tinsley the whole game and didn’t foul him once. Also, it’s amazing how low Doron Lamb’s usage is in this game.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
I think Lamb did a lot of "keep the ball away from his man" defense
It seemed like when he was on Jenkins, Jenkins didn’t get the ball much, when he was on Taylor, Taylor didn’t get the ball much, etc.
Statistics is the part of mathematics that God didn't invent. - Ethan Smith
Also, I note 7 "undefended" threes, but you show only 5 in your breakdown.
What am I missing?
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
yeah, missed one somewhere
Statistics is the part of mathematics that God didn't invent. - Ethan Smith
JL, ...
Please don’t take my comment as an attempt to be critical. I was just looking for clarification. You are doing a heck of a job and we are blessed to benefit so extravagantly from your efforts. What’s more, you seem to be cranking this stuff out with ever increasing speed. Thanks!
oh I didn't don't worry ;-)
I’m a bit irked at myself for missing it
Statistics is the part of mathematics that God didn't invent. - Ethan Smith
It's not going to be a perfect match
What I do for the 3pt tracker is a literal “was the shot wide open from start to finish” or “was it guarded from start to finish” for the first and last. Semi Open is more of a catch-all for anything that doesn’t clearly fit into either of the first two categories.
3’s in the box score are based on who is “credited” or “blamed” for a make/miss, so a wide open made 3 might be “defended” by a player if they failed to get out on their guy, but for the purposes of the 3pt tracker it counts as a wide open shot. Sometimes there is a late closeout on a miss that in my judgement probably shouldn’t give the defender credit for the miss, but the shot itself wasn’t “wide open” so it goes as semi-open.
Statistics is the part of mathematics that God didn't invent. - Ethan Smith
Upon further review,
Miller did foul Jenkins on that 3-pt attempt. Got him on the elbow of his shooting hand. Jenkins’ little theatrics and the announcers’ commentary disguised what happened. (Miller got screwed on the 4th foul call.)
To begin the game, Jones left Goulbourne three times to drift to the basket as Vandy put up a shot. Didn’t block him out, leaving him free to snag a couple of rebounds. In one case, Jones left Goulbourne to double down low, leaving him free to slam home the miss. I’m convinced this is why Cal sat him down. Davis used to do this on the defensive end. But now he finds somone to put a body on. Jones needs to follow suit.
Jones did foul Tinsley on his made three. A bad no call.
Teague still refuses to switch on screens when the screener is a big man. After Tchiengang coldcocked him, I’m sympathetic. He tends to stay with the ball as his teammate switches, so we have 2 defenders on the ball and no one on the screener. He can’t keep doing that. If he wants to stay with the ball, he needs to communicate with his teammate.
On Jenkins’ looong 3 in the second half, Teague didn’t step up to guard the ball. He called instead for Miller to leave his man and go to Jenkins. Of course, by that time it was too late. Miller had no chance to get there before Jenkins rose for the shot. As the team huddled during the ensuing timeout, Teague gestured to himself and told Miller, “That was my fault.” Yes, it was.
When Tinsely broke wide-open to the basket for a layup, Teague had no idea the pass was coming. He was looking away from the ball. He must have felt pretty guilty when his man scored so easily. In a close game, that might spell the difference. And this one was pretty close.
As good as we are defensively, we can do better. As for the zone, we did not penetrate it the way have in other games. Miller is without question the one guy we can count on to get to the paint and cause problems. But we again seemed tentative against the zone this weekend. A lot of back-and-forth passing outside the perimeter. MKG wasn’t very effective against it. Lost the ball once, got fouled once. Davis didn’t set high picks, which had worked well in the past. I’m not as sanguine as JLev on this point. We should be able to attack it more consistently at this point.
I think your comments are mostly right.
I do think the Miller fourth foul was defensible, but I also think they should have let it go.
The long three, Jenkins was Miller’s man. Miller drifted too far away, and there was no reason to. That’s on Miller, not Teague.
Everything else I think is right.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
good comments
I saw a lot of the same things you did, particularly on the lack of switching by Teague on screens. I disagree with the Miller foul, after re-watching it 3 times I don’t think he made any kind of contact that affected the shot. Just a bad call, and I think it actually contributed to Jones not being whistled for the foul later in the game.
Statistics is the part of mathematics that God didn't invent. - Ethan Smith
I don't see a zone defense being any more effective against this team
You’re right. Miller, Jones and MKG can all get into the middle and bust a zone. I think the best chance is to get up into our guy’s grilles and stay with them. Unfortunately for our opponents, most of them don’t have the athleticism to do that.

by 











