Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

No. 2 Kentucky 68, Auburn 53: Same Story, Different Ending

Georgia, Alabama, Ole Miss, Florida, Vanderbilt, and Arkansas -- Those six teams represent the sextet of SEC road losses the Kentucky Wildcats suffered last year, road losses UK coach John Calipari was telling anyone with a microphone about leading up to the 'Cats first league road game of the year against the Auburn Tigers.

Whether it be missed free throws, botched set plays, or players passing up wide open shots, last year Kentucky invented new and depressing ways to lose when not performing its magic in the comfy confines of Rupp Arena. It's not as if the 'Cats were being blown off the visitors hardwood, though, for if one combines the total number of points UK lost its six road games by, the total comes to 18 itty-bitty, maddening points. The definition of close, yet so far, with the "far" being UK's inability to close-out games by valuing possession, making shots, and playing confidently.

Of course, eventually -- more accurately, after the ugly loss to Arkansas-- the youthful 'Cats grew-up, learned to focus in the final minutes, and won close games against Vanderbilt, Tennessee (on the road), Princeton (NCAA 1st Round), Ohio State (NCAA Sweet 16), and North Carolina (Elite Eight), turning what was becoming a disappointing season into one of triumph.

Star-divide

Sometimes memory is a funny thing. Sometimes a long-forgotten recollection comes back to us when a particular smell invades the olfactory, sometimes it's a song which brings back thoughts of yester-year. But this year for UK fans, it was the Indiana game which brought back the unpleasantness of seemingly long ago UK shortcomings. This year's IU game was Kentucky's first road game of the year, a road contest in which the 'Cats failed to execute, both at the free throw line, and much simpler, a foul in the final seconds -- when they had two to give -- as the Hoosiers set up for their final, victory clinching shot. Final second's failed execution ... ah, the memories.

As IU fans stormed the court, resonating in the minds of Kentucky fans was this thought: Uh oh, is this team going to have problems closing out close games? Helplessly wondering if this year's equally young team would suffer the same road fate as last season's 'Cats, Kentucky fans hoped for the best, and prepared for something less.

Then, after a series of UK game-winning performances ranging from dominant to dormant, the 'Cats initial conference road test arrived. At Auburn. Against a coach in Tony Barbee, who knows Calipari's coaching techniques and tendencies better then he knows his own (Barbee played four years with Cal, was a grad assistant at UMass under Cal, and coached six years with Cal at Memphis). Bo knows, but Barbee knows Cal.

Barbee's team, though, is still a work in progress after his one-plus year on the bench. Worse yet, it's a Tiger team which lost their two previous outings by a combined 59 points to Vanderbilt and Florida State. Unfortunately, the Wildcat players know this, and regardless of how enthusiastically Calipari and staff praise Auburn, and warn the squad of the costly price to pay for complacency, overly talented youth, predictably, will almost always behave overconfident and head-strong. The cornerstone emotions of any healthy, incredibly gifted teenager.

And as sure as Rick Pitino is losing his mind due to chronic befuddlement, mighty Kentucky, No. 2 ranked Kentucky, found itself in a dog fight heading down the stretch of its first SEC road contest. Why? Because they did not take the Tigers seriously, and the Tigers, fresh off a "pep" talk from Barbee questioning their manhood and facility to play basketball, came to life when the 'Cats took to the floor.

Behind the inspired play of center Rob Chubb and his 10 first half points, the Tigers found themselves behind by only four -- thanks to a Darius Miller last second 35-foot 3-pointer -- on the strength of 22 first half points in the paint. Twenty-two first half points in the paint for Auburn, and perhaps even more disturbing, UK had only 10 (but hey, the 'Cats took 12 first half three-point shots, something I'm sure Coach Cal was tickled to death with).

The Wildcat mindset was: we can beat this team from the outside, after all, they're playing a 2-3 zone. Wrong. Instead of finding the seams in the zone, instead of relying on mismatches (of which there were several), instead of reversing the perimeter to open up space inside the zone, the 'Cats settled for jumpers. Yes, UK made 5-of-12 from long-range, a very respectable 41.7 percent, but it's not the makes that matter, it's the mindset. In the first half, 44.4 percent of UK's shots were from beyond the arc (12-of-27), in the second, more successful half, the 'Cats 3-point shots accounted for a more reasonable 26.7 percent (8-of-30). In the first half the team didn't execute the game-plan because they felt as if they didn't need to. Some teams might get away with that at home from time to time, but not on the road. Not in the SEC, where opponents' talents are inflated to a startling degree when Kentucky comes to town.

But it's all good. Young players are expected to play like young players, except when it comes time to win. And in this game, on the road, winning time belonged solely to the 'Cats.

Winning 101

John Calipari said after the game,"At one point I looked at the staff and said, 'this has nothing to do with X's and O's, boys. We could be going down,' and that was probably with 10 minutes to go that I said that to my staff."

Ironically, at what must have been very nearly the same moment, just after Anthony Davis scored on a tip-in which tied the score at 47 with 10:22 remaining, I turned to my wife and said, "This should be when they turn it on."

And turn it on the 'Cats did. In the final 10:22 of the game, UK dominated, just as they should have for the entire contest. The 'Cats dominated the boards -- After being battered 31-to-14 on the glass the first 30-minutes of the game, UK claimed 15 of the 19 available rebounds over the second half of the second stanza. The 'Cats dominated the offensive glass -- UK snagged only five offensive rebounds the first 30-minutes, then claimed seven offensive boards (on eight UK misses) in the final 10-minutes. The 'Cats dominated on defense and offense -- Kentucky held Auburn to only 2-of-9 from the field (after AU made 45.2 percent the first 30-minutes), while the Wildcats made 8-of-16 shots down the stretch, drastically improving on the 35.7 percent UK shot the first 30-minutes. The 'Cats dominated the free throw line -- Over the last 3:09, UK made 7-of-8 freebies. Finally, the 'Cats dominated the scoring column -- Crunch time saw UK score 21 points, while Auburn could muster only six.

Did Auburn get tired, wore down? I don't think so. Consider this, UK had six 'Cats play over 24 minutes, and Auburn had eight players play 13-plus minutes. I don't believe Auburn got tired, I think UK got motivated. Whether the team thought, "OK, enough of this playin' around," or, "Cal is going to have a coronary if we don't play better," or "Man, this game's on TV." Whatever it was that spurred the 'Cats, it worked (it is a dangerous game, though, this turning it off, then on, because sometimes when one reaches back for the fastball, it isn't there).

Does this game, against a clearly out-manned opponent, played away from home, signify that this Kentucky team is a team of road finishers? Certainly we don't know that ... yet, but like last year, and the year before, it's gonna be a blast finding out.

Thanks for reading and Go 'Cats!

Comment 28 comments  |  3 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Awesome Ken.

I think this team will get it, and yes, it will be a blast finding out for sure.

Blue... there is no other color to Bleed !!!

by a2d2 on Jan 12, 2012 7:40 AM EST reply actions  

Tip-ins

A couple of those tip-ins by Davis last night were incredible. I didn’t think a human could contort his body in ways like that.

by jdogblue on Jan 12, 2012 7:52 AM EST reply actions  

Life on the road

It’s never easy especially with the Kentucky on the uni being a giant bullseye. We get everybody’s best game and the crowds are sellouts and crazy. I too thought this would be a blowout. I watched some of the AU-Vandy game and the Tigers performance,from what I saw,was one of the worst I believe I have ever seen in the SEC. So I expected this game to be over by the half. And when the gets jumped out to a 9-2 lead I felt they were well on their way of achieving that. I drank the Kool-Aid and I think the Cats..especially the freshman..did as well. Like Cal I thought this team was going down when AU regained the lead in the 2nd half. They weren’t hitting shots or rebounding or getting those 50-50 balls. They were primed for being upset and all along I kept thinking to myself “here we go again..just like last year”. But something different happened. They got tough and began to hit the boards,got some loose balls and hit some HUGE shots. Those are things last years team didn’t do at crunch time on the road. I think this game will be a bigtime learning expierence for this team. And it doesn’t get any easier. Rocky Top will be rockin’ on Saturday.

by maysvilleblue on Jan 12, 2012 8:37 AM EST reply actions  

Same thing happend vs UL...

we went up by so much, got too confident…then got rolled on for a come-back…I think the team has learned now :)

http://www.JohnWallWear.com

by kentuckyrules on Jan 12, 2012 9:28 AM EST up reply actions  

Balanced scoring.........

was a big thing I noticed. When you see that across the board, it really screams team effort. This team may not have that killer instinct, but they certainly keep grinding and don’t give up. As long as they keep working together, they’re going to be fine.

"Shut up brain or I'll poke you with a q-tip" - Homer Simpson

by slidemank on Jan 12, 2012 9:01 AM EST reply actions  

This team's balanced scoring enables me to relax

because, like so many UK teams throughout history, any number of players are capable of dropping 20+ on any given opponent. To me, that’s comforting.

by Ken Howlett on Jan 13, 2012 1:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Great perspective...

Winning on the road ain’t easy, in any conference, for even the best of teams. Let’s appreciate this for what it was: a tough road win. We may not get so lucky next time, but we were good enough to pull out of Auburn with the W. I’ll take it.

by jc25 on Jan 12, 2012 9:07 AM EST reply actions  

Rebounds, Especially Offensive

Is there really any better effort metric? Would be interesting to know how many times the home team leads in rebounds.

"In times of universal deceit, telling the truth will be a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

by Wild Weasel on Jan 12, 2012 10:40 AM EST reply actions  

In all fairness to the team

they don’t get a lot of practice against zone defenses so they have to learn through real game experience. In the first half they did try to go inside but they did not do it with what that type of zone gives to them. In the second half adjustments were made and they began to solve the zone better, especially as the game wore on.

I hate losing as much as the next cat fan but the sky will not fall if we drop a close game on the road. I hope that our opponents keep giving us challenges that test and temper our young team. I have had a fear that a soft SEC might be our downfall in the post season. It looks like they will get plenty of tests on the road ahead.

If they can find a way to win at UT this weekend, I feel that might show this team is truly ahead of last year’s team at this point.

Making waves in a sea of blue.

by kywineman on Jan 12, 2012 10:44 AM EST reply actions  

No doubt(?) UK will lose on the road

then, we get to dissect and determine how they respond to a SEC road loss … see, it’s a cycle :)

by Ken Howlett on Jan 13, 2012 1:28 PM EST up reply actions  

It was certainlty good to see them win this game

I still don’t think Auburn is all that good, but even bad teams will put together better-than-you-would-believe-possible performances each season, and this was one of those games.

The most aggravating thing to me while watching was the seeming disinterest by the Cats in giving help on drives. It seemed that Auburn got 4-5 baskets when Kentucky’s post players just stood and watched them drive by instead of stepping in to cut off the path to the basket.

For all the talk of the trouble UK has with zone defenses, I thought they did a fairly good job of attacking it last night. Multiple players were getting to the soft spot in the middle of the zone, either with the ball or ready to receive a pass, and they got some good shot attempts from that action, they just didn’t go in with the kind of regularity we expect.

Statistics is the part of mathematics that God didn't invent. - Ethan Smith

by JLeverenz on Jan 12, 2012 11:54 AM EST reply actions  

Great points all JLev

More than once during the game, my wife asked why UK wasn’t guarding the guy going to the basket, LOL. I had no response.

As far as attacking the 2-3, I thought at times they did well, but I also saw them settle, and settle too quickly into the shot clock. Could be because they were trying to quicken the pace because AU used nearly every bit of the clock on offense.

by Ken Howlett on Jan 13, 2012 1:31 PM EST up reply actions  

I think they are all aware that AD is back there and depend on him to be the stopper - blocking those shots

This is a small weakness on defense that I’m sure Cal is addressing to the players.

A man is nothing more than a summation of his scars!

by KansasUKCat on Jan 14, 2012 7:17 AM EST up reply actions  

great stuff

these kids are learning. they had some great looks in the first half. i think they were staring at the crowd instead of the rim a few times there. even the “Mary Has a Little Lamb” chant got to Doron when he was shooting a FT (front end of a one and one to boot!!) near the end of the 1st half. everyone has touched on the whole rebounding issue…a blind man could see that about half of them were the usual bad bounce (bouncy rims) combined with bad positioning but the other half were from fading away from the basket when a shot is taken. A couple of times I saw DAVIS leaking out…what for? Pad your stats big fella! Buckets and boards ALL DAY!!! Still learning. Another thing that helped the Tigers in the first half were the “heart” shots mentioned above. Fadeaways, teardrops, rainbows…i was waiting for Chubb to break out the hook on Wiltjer or a Tomahawk from Denson. Those kinds of shots.

Had UK gotten to more boards they would have been up double digits at half easy. Based on percentages I know nothing about. ;j It was a SWEET 3 by Miller to redeem his first half miscues. Also, Jones created a ton of plays that didn’t get finished because his teammates didn’t finish. He appeared solid.

Like a Cat playing with a mouse these young men were letting Auburn stay in the game as it were. Not that Auburn didn’t deserve to hang with UK for so long, their effort assured them otherwise. It is just obvious that had the UK players played with the same passion the Auburn men the game would have been out of hand before the half instead of near the end of the game.

Maybe at UT they’ll see….

GO BIG BLUE!!!

I have kleptomania,
but when it gets bad,
I take something for it.

by bluecrip on Jan 12, 2012 3:53 PM EST reply actions  

Hey bc

A cat playing with a mouse … now why didn’t I think of that analogy? I mean, really, that is pretty accurate.

by Ken Howlett on Jan 13, 2012 1:33 PM EST up reply actions  

So the 2d half was more successful

because a lower percentage of our shots came from deep, and we made a much worse percentage of them? That can’t be right. I believe we’re confusing correlation with causal relation.

For the game, we shot 43.2% from 2-pt range. We shot 35% from deep, but that’s an effective 52.5%. So overall, even with our weak 3-pt shooting in the second half, we were more efficient scoring from outside.

The first-half numbers bring this more sharply into focus. Five of 12 from deep is an effective 62.5%. That’s more than respectable. If you shoot 62.5% for the game, you win. By contrast, it looks like our 2-pt shooting was just under 40%. So there’s no question our outside scoring was far more efficient.

You shouldn’t hold your 3-pt shots to an arbitrary or preconceived percentage of total shots. That has the process backwards. You have to let the shooting percentages drive your shot selection. If something’s working, exploit it. If that means 3s, shoot more 3s. Let the percentage of total shots fall where it may.

by Wheatgerm on Jan 12, 2012 5:36 PM EST reply actions  

You're numbers don't lie

but I wasn’t writing about %’s, it was more about what their mindset.

by Ken Howlett on Jan 13, 2012 1:35 PM EST up reply actions  

An interesting comment made by one of the commentators during the game

Evidently Auburn’s coach told his team that Davis tries to block every shot he can at the goal and when he does he’s gets out of position for the defensive rebound. So he told his guys to hit the board hard when AD did his thing. It sure helped their offensive rebounding in the first half. Has anyone paid any attention to this and how it affects our defensive rebounding..?

A man is nothing more than a summation of his scars!

by KansasUKCat on Jan 12, 2012 6:03 PM EST reply actions  

Is anyone else

starting to cringe when KW puts one up?

God Bless Our Troops............Especially Our Snipers!

by bigbill992001 on Jan 12, 2012 7:26 PM EST reply actions  

Gracias, KH

Some how Gilchrist was omitted between preview and post. Wouldn’t want folks to think it was intentional so I’ll add it here.

Kidd-Gilchrist — even his motor was not at full RPM early in game but that changed in second half and his pursuit of two loose balls was instrumental in Cats’ end-of-game run; only 3 rebounds testament to his lack of usual aggressiveness; seems as though he commits a couple of charging fouls per game: discretion over valor, shoot the pull up 5-footer. Just proves no one is perfect.

"In times of universal deceit, telling the truth will be a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

by Wild Weasel on Jan 13, 2012 2:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

An exciting community-driven SBNation blog, by and for fans of the Kentucky Wildcats.

Community Guidelines
[UPDATED 01/18/2012]

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Eko_world_small
Coach Cal and His Love for Hair Flare
323_small
N.Y. Times/Pete Thamel / FLW Tour- Nerlens Noel Open
323_small
In Cal We Trust?
Small
Show 'Em The Money
323_small
Richie Farmer: Unforgettable Or Not?
Eko_world_small
Huge Problem for UK FANS
Img_0019_small
Not of general interest.
323_small
The King Is Dead, Long Live The King!
Grover_avatar_small
Reds Fans Upset UK to be Honored at Tonight's Game
Small
Recruiting In 1960's > Limit Was 25 Scholarships

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Twitter Widget -- Follow me!


Managing Editor

Tru_small Glenn Logan

Editor

Derby_024_small BigSkyCat

Fl_family_photo_small Ken Howlett

Author

Small JLeverenz

Justified-olyphant_small jc25

P1000195_small a2d2

Img_0019_small Alex Scutchfield