NCAA Rules: The NCAA Hands Down Penalties For Tennessee
The hammer has finally fallen on Tennessee, albeit rather gently and without much damage to their sports programs. Not so for coach Bruce Pearl and his assistants.
Today the NCAA released its public report on the penalties for the Tennessee Volunteer basketball and football program for NCAA violations resulting mostly from the actions of former head basketball coach Bruce Pearl and former head football coach Lane Kiffin.
The paragraphs describing Bruce Pearl's actions were somewhat more revolting than what I already knew. Even as he admitted lying about the barbecue, Pearl apparently lied about how it all went down:
According to the former head men's basketball coach, he told the parents of prospect 1 at the tailgate that he was hosting a dinner that evening but it would be an NCAA rules violation for the junior prospects to attend. He claimed that his conversation left the impression that it would be the decision of the prospects whether or not to attend.
...
However, the former head men's basketball coach was the only person who offered this version of how the junior prospects came to attend the dinner. The parents of prospect 1 recalled being invited to the dinner by former assistant coach 1. The only time they were told it was impermissible for them to attend was after they arrived at the house, when the former head men's basketball coach told them that their presence was a violation and asked them not to tell anyone about being in attendance. The mother of prospect 2 reported that, at the tailgate gathering, she heard a coach and some student-athletes talking about the dinner. The mother of prospect 3 recalled being given an address where everyone was to meet. She did not realize it was the former head men's basketball coach's home until she arrived. None of the junior prospects or their families realized their presence at the dinner was a violation until informed by the former head men's basketball coach after they arrived at the home. [My emphasis]
Pearl also apparently lied more than once:
-
Like Jim Tressel at Ohio State, Pearl also signed the NCAA annual certification form that he neither knew or had any involvement in NCAA violations;
-
Pearl denied recognizing the picture of himself and one of the recruits shown to him by NCAA investigators on June 14, 2010;
The really offensive thing for the NCAA was that Pearl, after being interviewed, tried to influence one of the prospects' family to join him in the deception. It is clear from the text that this really angered the NCAA, and I can only imagine what they would say in an off-the-record conversation. Pearl is lucky they didn't try to ban him from coaching for life, which doubtless crossed their minds.
The NCAA threw a failure to monitor charge at UT for the phone calls, and that is clearly right, and requires no exposition. Read the report if you want detail about that.
All the football violations were found as secondary. I thought that because of the sheer volume of violations and the proximity to the basketball problems that they might get hit with a lack of institutional control, but the committee didn't even go near that. Lane Kiffin, in my view, got off light.
The committee also found that UT cooperated well with them. I can't comment on that at all. If they say they did, I believe the committee.
Tennessee was hit with two years of probation. The NCAA also accepted all institution-imposed and conference-imposed penalties and corrections, but added nothing new themselves other than as already mentioned. If you want to know all the self- and SEC-imposed penalties, read the report.
Bruce Pearl gets a 3-year show-cause order, and explicitly banned Pearl from recruiting during this period, even if a school was willing to accept the possible show-cause penalties. His former assistants were hit with a 1-year recruiting ban and show-cause order.
Overall, Tennessee and their fans are undoubtedly giddy with this news, as it does not hamstring their new basketball coach, produced no post-season bans, and really did most of the damage to the coaching staff responsible for the most egregious violations. All in all, I think that was pretty fair, and I would suggest that UT saved themselves by their high level of cooperation with an assist from Mike Slive, who hit Pearl with sanctions last year. UT fans may laugh at this, but they owe Slive a debt of gratitude.
So those are my observations. Feel free to add yours, or question mine in the comments.
18 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
My only concern here is this.
Tennessee basically (probation aside) walked off scot-free. No post season ban, no TV ban, no major impact on the program that Pearl’s leaving didn’t already hamstring them with. I agree that their recruiting restrictions were a necessary evil, although I think that had a post season ban been instituted, it would have had a much more far-reaching impact.
The line this draws is as such. If a coach brings in a player that helps you, we take away everything that you benefited from as a result. If you gain nothing from your actions, yet they still violate NCAA rules, then we are going after the people. Pearl’s suspension aside, I don’t see much here that puts a big time hurt on the program. That could be good, that could be bad, but it is what it is.
I am now and shall forever be the Cat in The Hat, The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!!!
by Greg Alan Edwards on Aug 24, 2011 7:17 PM EDT reply actions
I just find it hard to believe that the sheer volume of secondary violations committed
between Pearl and Kiffin did not justify something more significant. Of course, the committee has their own ideas and I have mine, but I will say this. Tennessee needs to not only be thankful to Mike Slive, they need to be thankful this incident did not occur 2-3 years from now. With the changes proposed in the NCAA, they could have gotten much worse then.
I am now and shall forever be the Cat in The Hat, The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!!!
by Greg Alan Edwards on Aug 24, 2011 7:22 PM EDT up reply actions
Well ...
… a couple of thoughts:
- The NCAA isn’t even considering a TV ban in Miami’s case, so that’s not a surprise.
- I’m not sure a post-season ban was really warranted. The report indicates that UT cooperated pretty well with the NCAA, and that the worst violations were the actions of Bruce Pearl. Where UT was culpable was primarily a failure to monitor. I think the NCAA showed good restraint there.
- I agree that there isn’t much hurt on the program, and frankly, I’m not sure there should be.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
I dont completely disagree. And to be honest , I guess
the damage done to the program simply through the loss of personnel is pretty severe, it just again highlights the fact that at present, the NCAA, has no precedent to go by that fits these cases where the coaches lie about what happened and got caught in the lie.
Had there not been multiple violations in multiple sports I believe I would have felt differently. Maybe they got exactly what they should have, maybe not. But that program was the definition of " failure to monitor" if there ever was one.
I am now and shall forever be the Cat in The Hat, The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!!!
by Greg Alan Edwards on Aug 25, 2011 6:50 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Yes, I think that's right about failure to monitor.
I think that UT’s compliance program, despite their best intentions, needs major work.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
???
How can you claim that the NCAA is not considering a TV ban for the ‘canes? We’re probably a couple years from resolution of that, and even the death penalty is theoretically on the table according to Emmert (though I think it’s unlikely)
by NYCCats on Aug 25, 2011 2:09 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
The talk at work today-
Centered more around the Pat Summitt revelation than the Bruce Pearl penalty. It is a shame that Pearl thought in order to compete in the SEC, that he had to cheat. He will eventually rebound from this and coach again. He had a good thing going at Tennessee and HE messed it up. His new house is up for sale, and he will have to start again somewhere else. And he will. He is a good coach who knows how to relate to today’s young men. They love to play for him. It hurts the SEC in that Tennessee will be down for awhile, and we had a good rivalry going with them. Most people just really talked more about the future of the Lady Vols…
"You are what you are and you ain't what you ain't"
Probably.
This is most likely about what they can expect. The two cases are similar, with Pearl’s situation being more egregious than Tressel’s.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
MORE EGREGIOUS?
Are you serious?
"It breaks your heart. It is designed to break your heart. The game begins in the spring, when everything else begins again, and it blossoms in the summer, filling the afternoons and evenings, and then as soon as the chill rains come, it stops and leaves you to face the fall alone." A. Bartlett Giamatti
No, I like to just say crap like that to get a reaction out of you. :-)
In hopes of getting yet another gratuitously amazed comment, I’ll reiterate.
Much, much more egregious. Galactically more egregious. Get my point yet?
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
I thought it was just me you gave a hard time to......;-)
I am now and shall forever be the Cat in The Hat, The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!!!
by Greg Alan Edwards on Aug 25, 2011 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions
Well...
I read the later article on this issue, and I just disagree. They both lied, and the actual violations on the part of Tressel and OSU were light years worse than committed kids coming to a cookout.
"It breaks your heart. It is designed to break your heart. The game begins in the spring, when everything else begins again, and it blossoms in the summer, filling the afternoons and evenings, and then as soon as the chill rains come, it stops and leaves you to face the fall alone." A. Bartlett Giamatti
What surprises me
Is how willing (still) coaches are willing to risk such a severe punishment for such a minor gain. Pearl lost his livelihood for 3 years to have some kids come to a barbecue. I mean, really?? Why, if you were Pearl, would you risk that for such a minor recruiting “advantage”?
by NYCCats on Aug 25, 2011 2:15 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
I disagree.
With the logic you use. Some coaches who break rules and get caught do take a hit financially. Others don’t. Some actually get better jobs when they move on and leave the mess behind. I think it is actually pretty rare that the coach suffers anywhere near as much as the kids and the school. It’s about time the NCAA started penalizing the people that commit the violations – instead of everyone who didn’t commit the violations. But Tennessee got off really light in my opinion on this one, anyway. I think they knew more about what was going on – in fact – I think they were consciously willing to take the chance with what Pearl and Kiffin were doing. Hard to prove though.
Oh – and I believe that it is fairly likely that a lot of coaches break rules and do not get caught. That’s another factor in the equation.
Kentucky Basketball - The Reason for Living
This...
I believe that it is fairly likely that a lot of coaches break rules and do not get caught.
is just so hard to imagine.
"It breaks your heart. It is designed to break your heart. The game begins in the spring, when everything else begins again, and it blossoms in the summer, filling the afternoons and evenings, and then as soon as the chill rains come, it stops and leaves you to face the fall alone." A. Bartlett Giamatti

by 








