NCAA: Point the Accusing Finger Toward Lexington, plus, Alex Poythress Cold Busts Coach K
As I'm sure most of you are aware, the ongoing saga of the Kentucky Pros vs. the Dominican Republic National Team took an unexpected turn Saturday. It seems as though the NCAA did not step in and deny former UK coach Joe B. Hall the chance to coach the Kentucky team in the August 15 exhibition. Instead, it looks as though the decision-makers at UK opted to pull Hall and former UK player Sam Bowie off the sidelines for fear of fracturing an NCAA bylaw.
After much derision and castigation were thrown its way from all corners of the blogosphere, twitter-sphere, and radio, the NCAA came out with this statement (found on the NCAA web site), which says in so many words; it twasn't us who stopped Hall and Bowie from coaching the game.
"Public speculation, fueled by inaccurate media reporting, incorrectly assumed the NCAA denied former Kentucky coach Joe B. Hall the opportunity to coach in an exhibition game against the Dominican Republic. In reality, the University of Kentucky withdrew its involvement and association with this event due to a conflict with member mandated NCAA bylaws. These bylaws prohibit member schools from participating in events that pay former players and raise funds to benefit teams that include prospective student-athletes."
More fun after the jump.
Kentucky has known since the inception (or at least, very nearly after) of the Kentucky Pros vs. the Dominican Republic exhibition game, that UK could not be affiliated with the contest. I speculate, after Joe B. Hall and Sam Bowie were announced as coaches of the Kentucky squad via John Calipari's twitter account, that someone, possibly someone in the UK compliance office, brought up the possibility of an ex-coach and ex-player roaming the sidelines during the contest just might fall under the umbrella of the NCAA bylaw which prohibits UK from participating in the event. (I'm still not clear on why Hall is not allowed to coach the Kentucky team, but is allowed to assist Calipari with the Dominicans).
Now, the other confusing aspect of this summer melodrama, is why did UK allow the NCAA to take the blame for this fiasco? After all, that's a legitimate question. It's a legitimate question asked by many, most notably John Clay on his Sidelines blog. And one which, quite frankly, deserves the full attention and scrutiny of the Big Blue Nation -- How could University officials clam-up, when clearly an injustice was being perpetrated against the NCAA from all corners of the fourth estate.
Really, I got to thinking, hmm, why did Kentucky sit silent while all manner of hell and brimstone reigned down on the NCAA? And then, like a Phoenix, rising out of Arizona (to steal a quote from the immortal Frank Costanza), it hit me about my head and face ... could it be because of the recent rancor and strife between the UK and the NCAA? Could it be because the people at UK aren't exactly enamored with the decisions (and attitude) coming out of Indianapolis? Could it be because the NCAA is the least likely institution (since the Third Reich bit the dust more than half-a-century ago), to sympathize, leaving them to search high and low for sympathizers? Could it be because the NCAA is quickly losing credibility, and UK wants to further that feeling among its member institutions, even if for only a short time? Could it be because this is exactly the type of decision that perfectly fits the m.o. of the NCAA?
I can hear the conversation now. UK official "A" speaking with UK official "B," as they walked to lunch Saturday afternoon:
UK official A: "Well, the papers, Internet, and call-in shows are rippin' the NCAA over this Hall thing. You think we should say something publicly to take the poor bastards off the hook?"
UK official B: "Say something!?" Did you say, 'say something!?' What, are you out of your freakin' mind?! @#*&^$ the NCAA. Let'em take the blame for a while. They're probably hiring extra security as we speak, the spineless weasels. Let them come out with something. I mean, c'mon, those guys aren't too bright so maybe they'll hang themselves with some asinine statement." Etc, etc.
Why did UK allow the NCAA to twist in the wind? To me at least, it's pretty obvious.
Coach K Cold Busted
Evidently, Duke head coach Mike Krzyzewski absolutely vaporized the 'bump' rule. According to Alex Poythress, a 6'7" hotly recruited forward out of Clarksville, TN, Krzyzewski not only (illegally) spoke to him during an AAU event last week in Orlando, but the Duke coach offered him a scholarship. No using the Bruce Pearl, the-player-initiated-the-conversation excuse by Coach K here.
It will be interesting to see how the NCAA reacts to this. After all, one has to assume Coach K knows he's not allowed to talk to recruits at AAU events (a silly rule, though, if you ask me), so following that logic, Krzyzewski intentionally broke an NCAA bylaw. Who knew K was such a renegade?
If true, Coach K now has one more recruiting violation (1) than John Calipari (0).
Thanks for reading and Go 'Cats!
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Coach K
The NCAA knows that Bobby Knight has Krzyzewski’s back and would do nothing to aggravate Sir Robert and bring him into the mix.
A man is nothing more than a summation of his scars!
The NCAA didn't sanction Krzyzewski/Duke in the Maggette/Piggy scandal...
where the evidence of violation was clear enough a man went to prison and but the COI is going to penalize Krzyzewski over an obscure recruiting contact timestamp. Color me skeptical.
It is a clear violation if the facts being reported are correct.
Furthermore, penalties for violations during July are enhanced by rule, and are enforced twice as severely. Krzyzewski and his staff should lose at least two permissible recruiting contacts going forward.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Glenn Logan on Jul 31, 2011 10:27 AM EDT up reply actions
Is this exhibition game going to bite us in the butt?
I wish UK were working closely with the NCAA to make sure what we’re doing (what Cal is doing) is perfectly within the rules. But I don’t get that impression. It all seems ad hoc and uncertain, even perverse. The machinations are making me uncomfortable.
If UK has divested themselves entirely from the event, they should be fine.
My only concern is Vargas’ involvement violating some NCAA absurd rule since he is enrolled at UK.
I'm glad there's no more confusion over why coach Hall won't participate
It’s not because of the NCAA; it’s because of an NCAA rule.
by tyler cottrell on Jul 31, 2011 11:10 AM EDT reply actions
Hey,
apparently that makes all the difference. “We did not tell Coach Hall he couldn’t coach the Legends, our rule did”. Nice to see them distancing themselves from their own absurd rules.
I woke up feeling BLUE this morning. It's gonna be a great day.
I find some of this stuff to be rediculous.
The head coach of UK is coaching the Dominican Team, Vargas is playing for them, the Legends are made up of former UK players, I believe Hall is going to be the assitant coach for Cal, and the game is being played at Rupp. How does UK not have something to do with this game? It has UK written all over it. But if Hall coaches the Legends, that would just screw things up and possibly get UK in trouble? Rediculous.
And regradless if Coach K and Duke get penalized, it just goes to show you that all coaches knowingly or not, break the rules. But you would think Coach K would be a lot smarter than this. And if he was, than he knowingly broke a rule and didn’t care. I think the NCAA should come down hard on people who don’t care about the rules, but I doubt they will.















