Dan Wolken is less than pleased about the Calipari profile in Sports Illustrated
As you might expect, reaction is starting to roll in on the recent Sports Illustrated article by Scott Price, some of it favorable and some of it less so. That's just the nature of the beast, and if you read the article, you would have no trouble understanding why.
I've always thought that Dan Wolken, formerly of the Memphis Commercial-Appeal and now working for The Daily, an iPad newspaper in New York City, was a decent journalist. But his bizarre attitude toward Calipari smacks of animus that I thought was more professional than personal. Wolken covered Calipari for the Commercial Appeal back when Calipari was down there, and has tweeted out four tweets in the dead of night last night about Calipari and the S.I. article.
As usual, Twitter tweets are something like code that we have to translate. Journalists have their professional "code of ethics," so they are often forced to style their comments carefully to avoid the appearance of ... well, such things as raving lunacy. In Wolken's case, 140 characters is just not enough to hide either his feelings, or his agenda.
So I have decided to translate Wolken's tweets into something human beings can understand. As you all know, I have a close friend who is an empathic telepath, so he agreed to expose Wolken's true meanings.
Here's four tweets from Wolken a few hours ago, in chronological order:
DanWolken: Scott Price is one of my journalism heroes, but why did he write 10,000 words on John Calipari that said nothing new?
Translation: Scott Price is a tool who can't hold a candle to me. I know Calipari almost in the biblical sense, and the idea that Sports Illustrated wouldn't ask me for my opinion, which is really one of the few that counts, is absurd. I'm a real reporter, for Godssake, and Price is just a magazine schlub.
Truth is, I know that a lot of what Price wrote about isn't widely known, but I didn't want it out there for everyone to read. It makes Calipari look too good, and that sweat from a baboon's balls doesn't deserve any good press. Why couldn't Price just shut up about Calipari and write about Karen Sypher or something?
DanWolken: Calipari's passive-aggressive stance on how people view him is, frankly, boring. At least to me. From very first time I met him.
Translation: So I really don't know what passive-aggressive actually means, so what? Sue me. It sounded really good in a tweet, don't you think? Faux psychology has always been the province of us elite journalists, and always will be.
DanWolken: Here's the truth about Calipari: He wanted Kentucky because deep down, he longs to be seen as legitimate. Felt he could do it there.
Translation: By the time I get done with Calipari, his wife won't even show up at his funeral. I know he's a great coach, but I'd sooner attempt sexual relations with a live electrical panel than admit that.
My life's work is making sure the world never sees Calipari as legitimate, and if I have to sacrifice my first born to Jobu, I'll find some way to keep him out of the Hall of Fame.
DanWolken: Instead, it's gone the other way on him. Because of the spotlight associated with that program, the perception of him is worse than ever.
Translation: This Sports Illustrated article goes way too far. It gets rid of way too many misconceptions and downright myths about Calipari that I and a couple of my buddies in the press, like Geoff Calkins, have carefully cultivated for years. What worries me is that this may actually change some minds about him, and I just can't let that happen. People have to see Calipari the way I do, because I am apparently one of the few people in America who knows the truth about this scumbag.
I can't undo the damage Price has done, but I can make deceptive statements like this and hopefully mitigate the damage. I know the Cal hate is starting to unravel, but I'll hold it together if it's the last thing I do.
So there you go. Dan Wolken's tweets translated into English we can all understand.
Why does Wolken dislike Cal so? I could care less. Maybe Calipari was referring to him when he coined the now-famous phrase, "The Miserables," and perhaps that stung so much that Wolken is unwilling to forgive or forget. Or perhaps there was some other incident while Calipari was in Memphis. Or maybe Wolken and Cal are just like oil and water and never mixed. Who knows? More to the point, who cares?
Stay classy, Dan.
57 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think Dan still has a lot of butt hurt over Cal leaving Memphis
I follow him on twitter, and I think he hates everything and everyone.
Then it comes to be that the soothing light at the end of your tunnel, is just a freight train coming your way...
@btcoop71
Kind of reminds me of Buzz Bissinger ...
… without all the talent.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Dan Wolken is a miserable person
Follow him on twitter and you’ll see he never says anything nice about anyone, ever. John Calipari could win the national title after saving a bunch of orphans from a burning building during a flood and Wolken would still criticize him for it.
Either Wolken is just a troll (which I pretty much think he is) or he is simply a downright miserable person who has to make everyone else miserable around him.
I think there is a lot of jealousy in Dan
Then it comes to be that the soothing light at the end of your tunnel, is just a freight train coming your way...
@btcoop71
Why is anybody surprised?
First of all I haven’t a clue who Dan Wolken is other than what I have been told here. But he is a newspaper guy from Memphis…..Cal left Memphis…..FF was vacated at Memphis…there are your reasons. We have to get used to this. Cal isn’t liked by most and they are waiting for the ball to drop here just like it did at UMass and Memphis. Many are positive that it will. Am I 100% sure that it won’t? No because I have to admit that Cal makes me nervous. I stopped reading the SI article after 2 pages because of it. I don’t know Cal personally so all I have to go on is what I read and what I hear. Most of that isn’t good but I also don’t know how much of it is skewed because of the dislike of Cal. I love the talent he brings and the winning but like I said it all makes me nervous.
Here he is

Then it comes to be that the soothing light at the end of your tunnel, is just a freight train coming your way...
@btcoop71
I understand a little better now - he's jealous of Cal and all the big bucks he gets
See the picture. The guy can’t even afford a haircut or he’s trying, without much success, to imitate the white man’s version of Scotty Hopson…?
A man is nothing more than a summation of his scars!
Sorry maysvilleblue
the long rambling comment below was in response to an earlier comment of yours. Missed my “reply spot”.
No problem
I left a long rambling comment in response to your long rambling comment :-)
by maysvilleblue on Mar 9, 2011 1:26 PM EST up reply actions
What do you hear
that isn’t good or skewed? Also if willing what goes on with Cal that makes you nervous? I usually find your comments here to the point and productive.
I posted on the last thread about a conversation I heard on Mike and Mike with Bobby Knight. His comments about our coach cannot be understood outside the mess that is Bobby Knight. This conversation was about Knight being an OSU alum and a total supporter of Tressel as a quality human being who could not have done anything wrong. The situational ethics Knight presented were almost laughable except when one consisders that ESPN gives him such a wide audience when he makes comments as he did about Calapari in December. I just listened to First and Ten commentator Rob ?? say that “Calapari has ruined three programs” as the panel discussed the Ohio State mess. Skip Bayless listened with no comment and the moderator ….he was even less interested. Why is this relevant? That discussion was about “facts”.
I am doing paper work and can not work without noise. I need to go to HGTV here and quit this ESPN junk. I suspect the conversations will include Calapari all day long. I can[t imagine how he keeps his mind straight when he is the pivot point for all things ethical because in my opinion nothing at UMass or Memphis falls within his circle. I think it is so unfair to question his motivation. I do not know the man but I certainly would find it a pleasure.
I am reminded of an old poem ….that I can’t quote but the point was that two people – one who was afraid of spiders and one who studied spiders would run in opposite directions if someone yelled “spider” and given how true this is all over is it not a wonder that any of us can communicate at all – about anything.
You really should turn off ESPN.
Nothing about First and Ten is a discussion of fact – Skip Bayless is the regular there because his opinion is often so outlandish or controversial that it drives up ratings. Rob Parker is much the same, but on a level that can only be associated with idiocy. He once said on that very show that he didn’t think Tyler Hansbrough would make it in the NBA “because he’s white” – and he’s written things in his news columns that were patently false (accused a Mich. State football player of being in a fight when, in reality, the kid was at church).
Skip Bayless= Vanderbilt Degree and No Sense Whatsoever
I am now and shall forever be the Cat in The Hat, The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!!!
by Greg Alan Edwards on Mar 9, 2011 1:10 PM EST up reply actions
Except for games
I quit watching anything ESPN last year. They have a selective few programs that they pump up, the rest are just fodder for the mill.
"SPORTS"--Not interested----"CATS"--Pull up a chair,I've got all night.
True-very true and good advice
but I try to listen to a lot of opposing opinions. Sometimes I may then change mine and more often I do not…the differences just confirm mine. In the long run it is a lot like keep your friends close and your enemies closer. The worst that happens is I get work done because I get my blood pressure up….no afternoon lulls when I do listen…which is the two computer days I have. Saves money since I already have the cable and I don’t need to buy the 5-hour energy drinks. Just sit here typing and sputtering.
Give them a cussing for me :)
"SPORTS"--Not interested----"CATS"--Pull up a chair,I've got all night.
And there it is in a nutshell.
Pissing off UK fans is money in the bank because we will rise to the bait every time. I respond by making note of who is sponsoring this junk and refusing to patronize their business.
I woke up feeling BLUE this morning. It's gonna be a great day.
wineman
Were you the one complaining about the Regions Bank pop up woman on here? If so, i’m proud of you because she’s gone on my computer. You must have done some good.
"SPORTS"--Not interested----"CATS"--Pull up a chair,I've got all night.
Yep, that was me,
but I doubt that is the reason she is gone. Probably didn’t pay her bills.
I woke up feeling BLUE this morning. It's gonna be a great day.
She was aggravating
I almost called regions and complained. i couldn’t get within 2 In’s of her.
"SPORTS"--Not interested----"CATS"--Pull up a chair,I've got all night.
Why should ESPN have "programs" anyway?
Used to be,for the most part, just sporting events. I ask the same about MTV. They use to show just videos. Do they even show videos anymore?
by maysvilleblue on Mar 9, 2011 2:38 PM EST up reply actions
A good slander
suit might shut some of this yap up.
I woke up feeling BLUE this morning. It's gonna be a great day.
Facts
The only fact I can point to is my own nervousness and nothing more. I’m not saying I believe all that has been said and written concerning Cal. I very seldom watch ESPN other than the games themselves nor do I read many mags or newspapers other than the local paper. The bulk of info I get on UK…and sports in general…is here. I think Cal has done a great job here and he will eventually win national titles by overwhelming opponents with pure talent. But I can’t deny what I feel inside when it comes to him. I will always wonder if where there is smoke there COULD be fire. In no way am I anti-Cal. I’m just a concerned fan.
by maysvilleblue on Mar 9, 2011 1:23 PM EST up reply actions
Thanks
You have a viewpoint that I think many share. I appreciate your response. In many, many ways your reaction is a very logical one. I never have thought you were anti-Cal. And it is obvious you are like the rest of us —-a blue nation fanatic.
I don't begrudge your feelings about Cal
At first I was somewhat ambivalent about Cal. Now I have come to believe that Sandy Bell will ensure that the basketball program will always be in compliance with the NCAA. I hope she is the 800 lb gorilla in the room.
"SPORTS"--Not interested----"CATS"--Pull up a chair,I've got all night.
I feel good about Sandy Bell as well
but something could always happen beyond reasonable control. We are relying a lot on young people with lots of pressure from outside influences and we all know from personal experience how easy it is to avoid temptation. :)
I woke up feeling BLUE this morning. It's gonna be a great day.
kdc
I have a lot of faith in Sandy also, but can she prevent someone from taking a SAT for a recruit? Can she prevent someone from changing/improving an Algebra score?
by bigbill992001 on Mar 9, 2011 9:11 PM EST up reply actions
The only thing she can do
in such situations is thoroughly vet players with red flags. Since it has been made public that she has already denied Coach Cal two recruits, I think she is doing all humanly possible to stay on top of it. My career before winemaking was as a compliance officer enforcing state and federal regulations. You develop a sense as to whether the information you are provided is on the up and up or has the foul stench of duplicity. You would be surprised at how blatantly and openly some people lie to your face and have the ego to think they will get away with it. I wonder if she has any openings on her staff. ;-)
I woke up feeling BLUE this morning. It's gonna be a great day.
Little early on the post. My fingers are just like me: too fat
Can we blame Sandy for the short bench we have? It’s always nice to have a scapegoat around.
"SPORTS"--Not interested----"CATS"--Pull up a chair,I've got all night.
I don't know about that
but I remember one player (can’t recall his name) that was all over the place saying he wanted to come here and we never offered. I wonder if he was one that she nixed.
I woke up feeling BLUE this morning. It's gonna be a great day.
Forty will know
I remember him, I thought we had him and suddenly he falls off the edge of the earth. You may be right.
Are you listening to the trash at half time of the Vandy game? Announcers: “Old Miss beat UK once already and they have the confidence that they can do it again”. They made it sound like Old Miss had already won the game.
"SPORTS"--Not interested----"CATS"--Pull up a chair,I've got all night.
After speaking to a member of the Memphis press about Wolken
I think I have a better understanding of him and his handling of Calipari. Wolken wanted to be part o Calipari’s inner circle when he was in Memphis, and he was, to a point. Calipari would not give Wolken access to a lot of inside information that he flet like he was entitled to because of who he was, whether he printed it or not.
Wolken resented Calipari’s approach to all media, which has been to give national media as much or more access to him and his program as he does loacl. I cannot say that is right or wrong, just that it is what it is.
Wolken also resented that Calipari would not come right out and tell him that he was leaving, even after it was actually going to happen, and that he told everyone in the media at the same time what he was doing.
In Wolken’s case, it appears as though he is simply having a “sour grapes” moment.
I am now and shall forever be the Cat in The Hat, The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!!!
by Greg Alan Edwards on Mar 9, 2011 11:42 AM EST reply actions
Or he's grasping
for crumbs of attention.
I woke up feeling BLUE this morning. It's gonna be a great day.
Interesting
Wolken did an interview with allkyhoops.com right after Cal left Memphis for UK and he didn’t have anything bad to say……..as a matter of fact he had quite a few good things to say. Gathered he isn’t going to trash Cal in an interview on a UK site, but you would think if he had that much of a problem with him, he wouldn’t have done the interview at all. Here it is:
http://www.allkyhoops.com/2009/06/q-dan-wolken-of-memphis-commercial.html
"Shut up brain or I'll poke you with a q-tip" - Homer Simpson
Dan Wolken
Sounds like a fantasy/sci fi board game or movie character.
But not a cool one, like Yoda.
Dan Wolken is Fred Smith's butt wipe
Dan Wolken is the mouth piece for all the “Hurt Feelings” in Memphis. And what I mean be hurt feeling is Fred Smith, Owner of Federal Express, thought he could buy John Calipari into staying in Memphis as Coach of the Tigers. Yes he offered more money than John accepted to take the job at KENTUCKY to coach the WILDCATS. And there is what is BURNING the A88 of all at Memphis, John didn’t leave for the money, he left for the position at “KENTUCKY”. It was his dream job, why ?, CLASS, something that Memphis doesn’t have, never will, something that Fred Smith’s money can’t buy, just like his $25m hasn’t got Memphis in a BCS conference. …….Why do I say this ?? Because I used to work for FedEx, got hurt on the job and I know how they will try to sc88w over you.
Interesting but not the whole story
No one doubts that UK is a much more prestigious program than Memphis and only a rabid Memphis fan could fault Coach Cal for moving. However, a fair look at why Coach Cal left has to include the fact that the NCAA was already investigating Rose’s eligibility. Would Memphis’ salary that matched UK’s salary offer have stayed in affect once their 38-2 season was vacated? Would UK or another program of UK’s prestige have offered him a job after his second FF was vacated? To say Coach Cal left for the prestige of UK is true; but, it’s not the whole story.
Disclaimer: I’m a Memphis State graduate from KY. Things happened at Memphis while Coach Cal was there that I conveniently dismissed or downplayed. That doesn’t mean they will happen at UK; however, I have decided to keep my loyalty to the program and not any individual. Hopefully Sandy Bell (mentioned above) will be the difference at UK and Coach Cal may become to UK what Coach K is to Duke or what Bear Bryant was to Alabama; however, I’m not betting the farm on it.
With all due respect ...
… we have heard all this before. Countless Memphis graduates and fans have come onto this blog with unsubstantiated claims about all sorts of wrongdoing, unethical behavior, etc.
To answer your first question, it is my impression that no money or circumstance Memphis could have offered would have kept Calipari. Can I prove that? No. Is it possible that it was the NCAA matter that made it easier for him to leave? Absolutely. Does that mean it was the difference maker? By no means.
No article can possibly detail every action of a person’s life, and given Memphis’ obviously inadequate compliance efforts (even if you ignore the basketball matter altogether and just look at the ethical catastrophe that was the women’s golf team), I don’t doubt whatsoever that all the coaches at Memphis pushed the envelope like every other coach does, and if left to their own devices, coaches will get themselves into trouble. We have seen this over and over.
The fact that Calipari managed to avoid hurting himself speaks volumes to me. No matter what all the Memphis fans and former students come in here and say, despite a prolonged investigation, the worst allegation the NCAA could come up with that reflects directly on him is that he allowed Reggie Rose to travel with the team without making sure he paid his own way. I consider that a failure on Calipari’s part, but I don’t consider Rose’s alleged behavior Calipari’s fault.
At the end of the day, I am not, nor will I be impressed by one more claim (we must have heard hundreds by now) of things going on at Memphis from fans and ex-students. The charge of “sour grapes” and jilted lover syndrome are just far to easy to believe.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Far more eloquent than I
I was hoping you would be the first to respond, Thanks
"SPORTS"--Not interested----"CATS"--Pull up a chair,I've got all night.
Makes sense that somebody...
with “wine” in their ID would love any post with the term “sour grapes” included :-)
by maysvilleblue on Mar 10, 2011 10:01 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
You are one sharp cookie this morning
I love it
"SPORTS"--Not interested----"CATS"--Pull up a chair,I've got all night.
In the immortal words of Homer Simpson
“mmmmmm….cookies…” :-)
by maysvilleblue on Mar 10, 2011 10:29 AM EST up reply actions
In this tech age Homer could be talking about internet cookies:-)
A man is nothing more than a summation of his scars!
by KansasUKCat on Mar 10, 2011 11:35 AM EST up reply actions
More from Homer
“Oh, they have Internet on computers now.”
by GoLightning on Mar 10, 2011 12:48 PM EST up reply actions
Hard to make
good wine out of sour grapes. Vinegar maybe.
I woke up feeling BLUE this morning. It's gonna be a great day.
Enjoyed the reply
Glenn, enjoyed the reply. On the assumption that “no horse is too dead to beat,” please let me elaborate on two points. Will it change any minds? Probably not. First, I can obviously offer no proof countering the ""sour grapes" and jilted lover syndrome" but I give my word this is not the case. As my disclaimer above stated, I am a graduate of Memphis State (affectionately known as "Tiger High" to anyone from Knoxville) but I was born, married, and my wife’s family still lives in Kentucky. To expand the disclaimer, my "concern" is more for the state of Kentucky (UK being the flagship university and largely synonymous with the state) and college basketball as a whole. Again, I can offer no definitive proof to refute the claim of sour grapes – I can only give you my word that my concern over the potential for UK to suffer a similar fate to Memphis resides solely in my love for the state of Kentucky and college basketball as a whole (with UK being one of the most prestigious programs, anything that is bad for UK I believe is bad for college basketball). Your point about Memphis’ inadequate compliance is quite accurate and I was glad to read about Sandy Bell in this thread – her efforts may make my concerns unwarranted.
Which brings me to point #2. Your elegant defense of Coach Cal sounds strikingly similar to my defense of him during his years at Memphis (my defense lacked your sophistication but the main points were quite similar). For every charge against Coach Cal I had a justifiable reply. So why do I care if UK fans today sound a lot like Memphis fans a few years ago? Because history has a propensity to repeat itself and given Coach Cal’s connection with the state of Kentucky is tenuous at best, it is my opinion that his tenure at UK could (note: could – no one knows) end badly for UK. Right, wrong, fair, unfair, or simply bad timing, his time at UMASS and Memphis both ended badly. I would hate to see that happen at UK given UK’s standing within the state of Kentucky and its heritage of college basketball.
Thanks for the forum and the opportunity to state my opinion. Please note that I intentionally did not address why I no longer support Coach Cal. My rationale was simply to avoid a sidebar discussion on that topic since few (if any!) Sea of Blue fans would agree with me and it was not relevant to my point of view. Also, I have not, and will not, make a personal attack against Coach Cal. He has done some good things for his players and communities and I’m sure he is a decent and honorable man. Regards.
Thanks for your reply.
I would raise two comments in response. The first is that Kentucky is quite possibly the best school in the NCAA to employ a coach with Calipari’s reputation. The reason for that is that a) Kentucky has a poor reputation for NCAA compliance historically and b) As a result of a) Kentucky now has arguably the strongest and most capable compliance department of any university in America.
So while I am moved by your honest concern for Kentucky, I, and most Kentucky fans, are not concerned. We know that Calipari will be carefully monitored and assisted in matters of compliance here, unlike at Memphis. It is understandable for coaches to push the envelope hard — coaching is very competitive. It is the job of compliance to make sure that push does not go over the NCAA line.
I know Calipari does not want to be an NCAA scofflaw, but he does want to win. Those two interests are inherently conflicting, and that’s what a compliance department tries to manage. As a person who deals with compliance (albeit actual legal compliance, not rules compliance) every single day, nobody knows this better than me.
No rational person, Kentucky fan or otherwise, would put forth an argument that Calipari is perfect, or has never twisted a rule, or has done all the right things. Even Calipari would not make that argument, a point he makes abundantly clear in the Sports Illustrated article. But I don’t think anyone can fairly argue that Calipari is bent on breaking any rule that gets in the way of his success, at least not with proof of truth.
The facts that are known to anyone that is able and/or willing to articulate and support them do not conform with his terrible reputation. That has also been made abundantly clear in the article. So I am inherently skeptical of claims that he really is a scofflaw, it’s just that nobody has been able to catch him. Too many high-quality efforts have been made and the value of such a scoop is far too high for that to be true. Calipari has what is in effect the highest possible bounty on his head as far as reporters are concerned — the likelihood of a Pulitzer prize for bringing him down.
Finally, and again, I don’t mean this in a personal or pejorative way, UK may be prestigious, but we are hardly a pristine example of rules conformance. While I appreciate your concern, it is mostly misplaced here. We want our coaches to comply fully with the NCAA rules, and I want to get rid of them when they don’t.
But realistically, every coach who coaches at the Division I level will break rules if he thinks he can get away with it. The reason is not that coaches are bad people, but because they are good people with human fallibility. Very many, if not most NCAA regulations can be rationally argued as unfair to the young men and women they regulate, and every good coach has a strong emotional investment in the welfare of his players. That welfare is often threatened by strict compliance with rules in all sorts of ways — just ask Jim Tressel, the former “cleanest coach in America” if these conflicts of interest are manageable only by good intentions.
We went into this matter with our eyes wide open. The article makes that perfectly clear. If Calipari gets us in trouble, I for one will simply accept it — we made this bed, and the vast majority of us are happy to lie in it if things go south. It isn’t as if it has never happened here before, and even though nobody wants to go back there, every clear-thinking person knows that it is probably no more likely with Calipari than it would be with any other coach in Division I given the pressure involved and the strength of our compliance efforts
In sum, thanks for your concern, but we’ll be fine. I appreciate your rational and polite comments. You are always welcome to make them.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Glenn Logan on Mar 11, 2011 7:28 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
That was a great reply
But one thing you may have missed is the fact Cal,more so than probably any coach,is on the radar of the NCAA just as UK athletics as a whole are as well. Some may not believe that but I do. Some feel the NCAA treats everyone the same but I don’t. My guess is Tressel felt comfortable at OSU more so than if he were at a place like Miami or Oklahoma and because he was in Columbus he may have thought he wouldn’t get caught. Now I’m not sure how squeaky clean OSU has been throughout it’s history but off the top of my head I can’t remember major violations. But one thing I do know is the history of UK and I personally don’t think the NCAA forgets even if those who work for them changes over the years. I think the NCAA would love to nail Kentucky…again…and also Cal. But because of that I really believe everything will be done to make sure that he or anybody else doesn’t cross the line. With that being said,maybe I shouldn’t be so nervous about it all.
by maysvilleblue on Mar 11, 2011 11:42 AM EST up reply actions
First ...
… thanks for the flattery. :-)
Second, I don’t really care if the NCAA is watching us closely. Frankly, if I were them, I would as well. Let’s face it – any rational person would look to a repeat offender for likely offenses than to the previously innocent. I would like to believe that the NCAA is rational, and therefore expect that they are watching us very closely. That actually gives me comfort. We have more than earned the close scrutiny.
In the end, though, I think you are exactly right. We are ready for it, and able to handle the attention.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Glenn Logan on Mar 11, 2011 10:00 PM EST up reply actions
As an unbiased observer...
It seems to me that the first translation looks insightful but the last three look like complete BS. The last three translations themselves translate to this: Glenn Logan hearts Cal. To me the last three tweets seem to echo the first tweet and serves as Wolken’s proof that he is so much more knowledgeable on Cal.
Disregarding your bias and Wolken’s crowing, the main perception on Cal is probably just based on the fact that he’s had to vacate 2 Final Four appearance when most people couldn’t name any other coach who’s had to vacate one. That’s it. Period. The end. Wake us up if he ever wins it all- anything else (ie deep march runs, Final Four appearances even) will just remind us that he’s slimy.
Okay.
I’m biased, and Cal’s slimy. From an unbiased observer.
I think a further response is unnecessary.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by 













