Kentucky Wildcats Basketball: Is This Year's Kentucky Team Building a Culture for Success?
Today, Coach Cal put up his components to building a culture for success on CoachCal.com, and when you look at these, they make sense in a lot of ways. So what I thought I would do is examine each of them, and to the extent possible, determine how this year's team is doing. This, of course, is only my opinion, one among many.
Players First
The first on Coach Cal's list is "Players First," and what he says he means by that is "basically creating a family." Family can mean a lot of things to a lot of people, and sometimes it gets bandied about in ways that are inappropriate. In this case, what family appears to mean is a condition where the players care about each other to the extent that they are willing to sacrifice for each other. That's primarily what distinguishes a family from a circle of friends -- sacrificing is much easier and more willing for family than for friends.
This year, I think we have seen some of that, but as you would expect, surely not quite as much as we should expect down the road, and the trust is not completely there yet.In particular, this team seems reluctant to trust defensive rotation and get out on shooters tightly. That's one reason why we defend the three so poorly right now.
3-point shot defense requires that you get on your man close, and make him put it on the floor. You could see in the last game that UK was backing off shooters on the perimeter, trying to trust their length to bother the shot. That works fine for teams like Marist, but not for talented teams like Indiana or North Carolina. Great 3-point defense means that you are going to be beaten off the dribble, and you must trust your help. Right now, this team seems to have trouble with that trust.
Until the players learn to trust their teammates not to let them be embarrassed on a blow-by, they will not be a family. You cannot have a family without trust.
Unbreakable Work Ethic
This is one that we really can't judge, because a lot of that happens in practice, and in the classroom. Work ethic is hard for outsiders to see, except on the court. We know Jones worked really hard this off-season to get into shape, but after the IU game, Kentucky fans can be forgiven for wondering if he gave it up when classes started.
We have seen Michael Kidd-Gilchrist leave it all on the court most every game, and I think most of us would assume he does exactly the same thing in practice. We all knew Brandon Knight brought it, both in the games, in the classroom and in practice, because we were told so. We all saw what Josh Harrellson did after the scales were thrust from his eyes.
How is this team doing in this regard? Based on my observation, about as well as the other two so far.
Burning Desire To Win
This is one where Kidd-Gilchrist definitely shines, and I have seen that same desire in Doron Lamb, Marquis Teague, Darius Miller, and Anthony Davis. I think the jury is still out on Terrence Jones, and until he develops more consistency, I think Kentucky fans can be forgiven for wondering if that desire burns hot enough on its own, or requires frequent stoking.
In short, I think this team has it, but I do think there is a way to go for them to reach the critical temperature it takes to make the competitive fire intolerably hot for Kentucky's opponents.
Devour Practice
This is one I really don't know for sure. Based on reports we have received from Guy Ramsey, it seems like they are. To be sure, we have largely seen good results one the floor for a team so young, so I'm inclined to think this team practices as hard and as smart as any in the nation.
But then again, I don't really know, and neither do you.
Love of Team Before Self
This one, I don't think this year's team is quite there yet. They are making solid progress, and this team is truly the youngest we have ever fielded. It seems to me like the 2011 group might be ahead of the 2010 team, and a touch behind the 2009 group in this area, but that's pure perception on my part at this point. It took a while for Brandon Knight, Josh Harrellson, and the rest of last year's team to develop the true love of team first, but they unquestionably got there. I think 2009 got there relatively early in the process, shortly after conference play began.
What I do like about this year's team, in particular, is that they seem to understand how critical this element is to success, and how difficult it is to actually achieve. By the end of the year, I think both 2009 and 2010 easily met this test, and given what I have seen so far, I expect the 2011 team to be there by mid conference season, and that would be something really good.
There are undoubtedly many different takes on where we are at this point in the year with respect to Calipari's five building blocks for a culture of success, and this is just mine. I'm sure Coach Cal, and probably many others would disagree, and that's just fine.
So what do you think? How far along is this team, and how far do they have to go to reach each of these objectives in your opinion?
6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Not so sure on a couple of the items
Burning desire to win: I agree that Davis and Kidd-Gilchrist are there. Not so sure on the others yet.
Family: I agree with you that they don’t yet trust one another to help on defense. However, with a young team nine games in, they still have a lot to learn about playing with each other.
I do think this team loves one another. It started for the freshmen at the McD game last year. You could tell that they liked one another, hung out together, and were looking forward to playing together. However, then they were thrust into playing with Jones, Lamb, Miller, and Vargas and all those blending together will also take some time.
I think it’s hard for young men to appreciate practice. They experience all the hard work, criticism, and punishment. However, looking back on my brief career (high school only), practice occurred four times more often than games. I wish I had relished practice then as much as I think about now.
Burning Desire !
If there is any doubt these kids have that desire to win, we should get an answer in the next couple of games. For the super freshmen, this was their first loss. They didn’t know what it felt like to lose in college until Indiana. So, if anything they should all have the desire not to lose !
http://www.everythingkentuckyonline.com/2011/12/to-kentucky-basketball-fan-losing-hurts.html
This team is well on its way to meeting these goals
Or at least, the ones we can make educated guesses about. From the chemistry among the freshman, to Miller’s unselfishness accepting a bench role to Jones, Lamb, and Vargas improving over last year, this team is coming along nicely.
I like that Cal gives us these explanations from time to time. I really appreciate that he doesn’t simply say “Player’s first program” and leave it to everyone else to figure out what it means – he’s taken some time to think and reflect on it himself and share with the fans.
1/x doesn't die, it just fades away.
Love of teammates
One thing I have noticed about this team, as well as 2009, and which was lacking for 3/4 of the season for the 2010 team, is that when a teammate goes down, at least 2, and often all 4 other players on the floor rush over to help the down player. Small gestures like that are indicative of a team that loves and respects each other.
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
--O.W.
Lighten Up On Jones
I’ve read a couple articles today questioning Terrence Jones’ intensity and will. I think thus far this season he’s played very well – save the last game against Indiana. Don’t forget, that he kept the Cats in the first half of the North Carolina game – without his strong AND intense contribution, Anthony’s block at the end would have stopped UNC from winning by an even more comfortable margin. On a team with five guys averaging between 11 and 15 points, I think the intensity details are minutiae and varied. Check Jones’ stats with Kidd-Gilchrist’s, and I think you’ll find them very similar.
I agree that Kentucky’s three-point defense is very suspect. I watched all of the UNC game, and couldn’t believe my eyes when the Tarheels had uncontested three after uncontested three. From what I’ve read about the IU game, it was a similar scene. I’m not sure I agree with this being a trust issue at this point. I would think (of course I’m not a major college basketball coach) that if a shooter continues to hit a shot that you’re not defending, you adjust to defend – that just seems like common sense. If the fear is that “if I go to defend the three he may dribble past me,” then that sounds more like pride than lack of trust. With Jones’ 22 blocks, and Anthony’s 37 (not to mention Kidd-Gilchrist’s 11, and Vargas’ 6 & Wiltjer’s 7 in limited minutes), I would think that the interior defense has done about all it can to inspire trust that the basket is well-guared.
I love Calipari (please stay as long as you like), but if a team that you’re coaching is having difficulty guarding the three (and it seems that they’re all having trouble with it), then I think that falls on the leader.
Honestly, it would have been wonderful to have an undefeated season – we have the group, but losses like this are great for building fortitude and helping young men realize that they’re beatable. That usually fosters a belief that the whole is greater than the one, and that the one needs to bring his best to make the whole stronger. I think that will happen here and during conference play.
That should help us win six in a row in March.
I think it's fair to question Jones at this point.
He has plenty of opportunity left to answer those questions.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Glenn Logan on Dec 17, 2011 12:55 PM EST up reply actions

by 










