Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Blake Griffin Slam Dunks: NBA Jam Style

Occupy ESPN!! Fight back against ESPN3!!

I recently sent a message to ESPN requesting an answer to the question burning in all of our minds. Why the hell can't local cable companies broadcast local college team games just because they're on ESPN3? It's a valid question. People without a provider who offers ESPN3 don't have access at all, and people who do would much rather watch their team on television than their PC. I also learned the the UK/ PSU game was suffering the same fate. Here's where we stand....

Star-divide

 

The initial message:

To whom it may concern,
   Why can't our local teams be shown on local cable? The Louisville/ Butler game is available on ESPN3, which is a service provided by our cable provider, Insight. So why can't insight just show the game on a cable channel? Why must I be forced to watch a grainy/ choppy broadcast of my favorite basketball team? Why can't a local team be shown on a local channel? Why ESPN? WHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHYYYYYY?
     Please tell me how this is helping ESPN, the University of Louisville, or the fans? Please let me know, because at this point ESPN seems to be doing me a disservice by limiting my ability to watch this game to a low quality, barely watchable, mind numbing form of torture. The folks over at insight informed me that they reached out to ESPN to try and move the game to a channel on our network so customers can view it live on television, but ESPN would not allow it. Why? Why won't you allow it?
      Are you the Gods of all sporting creation? Are you so bent on pushing people to this web site that you won't allow local teams to be broadcast on local TV? I can appreciate the luxury of ESPN3 for people who live outside of the viewing area and can only see the games on ESPN3. They have no choice and probably love ESPN3 because they get to see games that they wouldn't otherwise. Also, if your'e going to put games on ESPN3, then you should put all games on ESPN3, even the ones on ESPNU.
    You are having your cake and eating it too, you are alienating your fans and really making some of us mad. I realize that you could care less because, we few, are but a drop in the bucket to a company like ESPN; but, at some point the customer should matter. At some point the people who make you what you are should mean something. That should apply to all markets, small and large. That mantra should apply to all of your customers.
        In summation, I see no reason on God's green earth why you would chose to force those of us living in the Louisville area to use ESPN3 for anything having to do with the University of Louisville. They are a small/ urban/ local school with a small passionate fan base that deserves better than this kind of Politburo control from ESPN.
Sincerely, Cardinal Fans everywhere

ESPN's response: (At first I got this "noreply" robo-message)

Hello,

Thank you for contacting us. At this time, WatchESPN is only available to you if you are an ESPN TV subscriber of Time Warner Cable, Bright House Networks, or Verizon FIOS. Online registration through your TV service provider is required in order to access content on WatchESPN. Non-participating TV provider customers have access to ESPN3 programming at WatchESPN.com on a PC or Mac, as long as they subscribe to a participating high speed internet service provider. To view a list of participating TV/Video or Internet Service Providers, please visit this FAQ:
http://espn.go.com/watchespn/faq#faq2

If you have successfully registered, and are still having problems accessing video on WatchESPN, please see the troubleshooting steps below:(then they explained how to trouble shoot any issues you may be having, Bullshit)

I submitted my original message again, this is the response I got:

Hello,

Thank you for submitting feedback on the WatchESPN.com video player.  Your comments will be shared with our WatchESPN.com development and product teams for consideration. For live assistance with this or any other issue, please call Customer Care at 1-888-549-3776 (ESPN) between 8:00 a.m. and 1:00 a.m.  EST.

Regards,

Sean J.
ESPN.com Customer Care

This seems to be from a real person, I think, so I sent Sean J. another message:

      That's nice, but you didn't answer any of my questions. Specifically, why can't the local cable company show local teams on a local channel? I would like an answer to this question that isn't complete and total nonsense. Because as it stands, the only reason I can think of is that ESPN wants to get people to their web site. That's all well and good, but you're punishing those of us who (a) don't have ESPN3 through our provider, and (b) don't want to have to watch the game via some crappy, low quality steam on our computers. People buy big screen high definition TVs for a reason, most sports fans do it so they can see the amazing high definition sports that ESPN provides. We don't invest all that money in TVs and HD packages just to get stuck watching our favorite teams on a tiny PC with an image that isn't as good as regular cable, and stops and starts depending on how much bandwidth you have.
      As I said in my previous message, you are doing the fans/ your customers a great disservice by relegating us to this low budget broadcast, AND not allowing the local cable companies to give us another option. I sincerely hope that this is not the way you treat your customers. I am a loyal subscriber of ESPN the magazine for nearly three years now and if this is the best response you can give me then I'm afraid you can go without my money from now on. I want a real answer, from someone there that wasn't from a form letter. If I don't receive one post haste, I fully intend to start a facebook/ twitter movement to boycott your magazine.
      People would never cancel their cable subscriptions to ESPN because they need them to see sports. I understand that; but, there is enough grumbling out there about ESPNs (alleged) involvement in conference realignment, and things exactly like this, that my movement will gain ground. In fact, I'm willing to bet that I can cost you at least 30-40k subscriptions. At $26 a pop that's nearly a cool $100k. A mere drop in the bucket to ESPN; but, it would certainly make me feel better. I eagerly await your response to my questions about why the local cable company isn't allowed to broadcast a local college basketball game just because it's on ESPN3.

Their reply:

Hello,

Thank you for your reply.

ESPN makes its programming decisions based on a number of factors, including viewership, as reflected by ratings and the interest from advertisers and affiliates, on a nationwide basis and is always investigating programming opportunities to better serve sports fans.

We appreciate your feedback. We’ll be sure to let our programming executives know that our viewers would like to see more local games on WatchESPN.com.

Regards,

Kristi
ESPN.com Customer Care

My response…
Ok, well,… if you’re really interested in better serving sports fans, then why on earth wouldn’t you allow a local sports team to be shown on television? This makes no sense to me what-so-ever. If the real interest of ESPN is to “better serve sports fans” then why are some “sports fans” not allowed to even see the game? Not every provider in our area carries ESPN3. Also, as I said in the previous message, the ESPN3 broadcast is a disservice to the fans because its quality is no where near the quality of a television broadcast. If a provider that already carries the ESPN family of networks, and ESPN3 is willing to provide coverage of a local college team to their fans,… then why wouldn’t ESPN allow them to do so? Preventing such a broadcast is not only a hindrance to those who don’t have access to ESPN3, it’s also a hindrance to those who have to watch the game in such a low quality manner. So again I ask you, why will ESPN not allow local coverage of this, or any other event for that matter, if their true interest is serving the fans?

Here is the email address if anyone wants to join me in this fight, if Cardinal and BBN both bombard them, will something get done? Probably not, but I'm sure they'll really enjoy having to busy themselves with all the responses. Get'em!!!

support@espncustomercare.com

Comment 26 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

It is ridiculous

ESPN has too much power, and they are using these games to try to blackmail smaller cable/internet providers to pay for their service.

Dayman, Fighter of the Nightman, Champion of the Sun

@btcoop71

by btcoop71 on Nov 18, 2011 2:42 PM EST reply actions  

Join the fight!!

Fool's names are like their faces, often seen in public places.

by Chick-Stratino'sUrDaddy on Nov 18, 2011 2:46 PM EST up reply actions  

This really is a good thing Chick......

I don’t think they care enough to bother turning on a light bulb, but they do need to hear about it when they do it.

I am now and shall forever be the Cat in The Hat, The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!!!

by Greg Alan Edwards on Nov 19, 2011 8:47 AM EST up reply actions  

Cats and Cards fans working together....

Surely the world as we know it has came to an end. =P

Seriously though ESPN should have a anti-trust lawsuit filed against them for trying to corner the sports viewing market….hum…..perhaps I’m on to somthing here…..

by bigblue1985 on Nov 18, 2011 4:13 PM EST reply actions  

They really have almost cornered the market.

There is competition coming for them though, unfortunately the competition is from a far more evil company, NBC/Comcast..

Aim for the head baby Jesus

by Doncosmic on Nov 20, 2011 1:14 AM EST up reply actions  

Is it possible...

that this is something that is governed by the rights agreements that ESPN has with the NCAA or the conferences?

ESPN frequently allows local NFL and MLB games that feature the Bears or Cubs/Sox to be simulcast on a local broadcast station for the Chicago market. So the network has a precedent for allowing local viewers easy access to their local games. I find it really odd that they aren’t doing the same thing for college sports.

You can put it on the board....YES.

by twocee on Nov 18, 2011 4:24 PM EST reply actions  

Can't even tell you how badly I pissed that guy off on the phone.

After arguing that he wasn’t answering my question for about 2-3 minutes the conversation went down like this. (Guy’s name was Adam)

Me: Look Adam, all I want to know, is how are the fan’s interests being served by not allowing some to see the game, and limiting others ability to enjoy it by forcing them to watch it on a laptop?

Adam: Sir, I’ve already explained to you that we are making the game availible to more than just the Louisville market which allows more people to enjoy the game than would have.

Me: I understand that Adam, but why won’t ESPN allow Insight to broadcast the game on local television?

Adam: (Clearly frustrated) I don’t know what else to tell you sir.

Me: Then you’re obviously not the person I need to talk to about this. Can I please be connected to someone who can answer my question?

Adam: There’s no one here who can give you an answer to that question Sir.

Me: Where are you right now Adam?

Adam: Bristol Conneticut Sir.

Me: At ESPN HQ?

Adam: Yes Sir

Me: So you’re telling me there’s no one else there knows more than you do about this situation?

Adam: Sir?

Me: Adam…

Adam: I don’t know what you want me to say Sir?

Me: I don’t want you to say anything, I want you to connect me to a programing manager, or someone who has the power to allow Insight to broadcast this game.

Adam: That’s impossible Sir…

Me: So you’re telling me that the World Wide Leader in Sports, which banks on the impossible being made possible by teams and athletes doesn’t believe it’s possible for a bunch of fans to see their team play a big game on television?

Adam:…………………????

Me: Adam?……

Adam: Yes Sir (now audibly snickering)?

Me: Ok Adam, you’re not allowed to kick my call up the right people are you?

Adam: No Sir.

Me: Ok, well,.. I just want you know I’m not mad at you personally Adam, I know you’re just doing your job. It’s not your fault that ESPN sucks.

Adam: I appreciate that Sir

Me: Have a good weekend Adam.

Fool's names are like their faces, often seen in public places.

by Chick-Stratino'sUrDaddy on Nov 18, 2011 5:26 PM EST reply actions  

Nothing surprises me less.

It was a laudable effort, though.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Nov 18, 2011 5:51 PM EST up reply actions  

I TRIED!!!

Fool's names are like their faces, often seen in public places.

by Chick-Stratino'sUrDaddy on Nov 18, 2011 6:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Are you sure he doesn't work at a call service center somewhere in the Ukraine - Hi my name is Peggy

If ESPN is like most multinational corporations they’ll always be looking to cut cost and improve revenues in any fashion they can – customer be damned.

A man is nothing more than a summation of his scars!

by KansasUKCat on Nov 19, 2011 7:43 AM EST up reply actions  

ESPN's Customer Service Department

Dayman, Fighter of the Nightman, Champion of the Sun

@btcoop71

by btcoop71 on Nov 21, 2011 9:46 AM EST up reply actions  

The same great customer service people who brought you....

…the new and improved Facebook!
[You know it’s better, because we told you it was!]

At least you guys have a chance to get it, or go visit a friend who gets the game. I have the same complaints about the hiccups of the streaming, and I am listening to the radio broadcast! (Or trying to. At least it is warmer than the car radio on a winter night. LOL)

by blenheim bard on Nov 18, 2011 7:49 PM EST reply actions  

What is sad is the fact that the SEC or more particularly UK has allowed this to occur and abandoned many faithful fans

I’m currently living in Indiana and have no shot of seeing any part of this PSU-UK game live. Yes I’m told its being shown on a delayed tape at 7:00 PM on a station I can get. But this harkens back to yesteryear, 20-30 years ago when Wave TV in Louisville would show many of the UK home games in a 11:30 delayed time slot. My God how we have progressed over the years – NOT.
Maybe our anger should be directed at the Athletic Department of UK. Surely they are aware of fan angry regarding this issue and if so make them feel some of our pain.

Simply speaking we need a UK sports network that would or could simulcast all UK games with ESPN3 locally – meaning statewide and available to all viewing areas within Kentucky and regional areas along our state lines, such as in the Cincinnati area. Texas can do why can’t we?

A man is nothing more than a summation of his scars!

by KansasUKCat on Nov 19, 2011 7:34 AM EST reply actions  

Now when I do stuff like this.....you guys think I am a conspiracy theory nut!!!

hehehe….

ESPN/NCAA/CIA/FBI/AFL-CIO/CLU/NFL/NBA/MLB/NHL……..

They are all entertwined and out to destroy the world!!!

I am now and shall forever be the Cat in The Hat, The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!!!

by Greg Alan Edwards on Nov 19, 2011 8:46 AM EST reply actions  

So maybe I'm missing something...

But I’m really not seeing the point here. So ESPN has made deals with people that give them exclusive access to a large number of sporting events? Isn’t that, iunno, their job?

______________________________________________
Boom. Here comes the Boom. Braydy or not. Here comes the boy from the West.

by bobothevol on Nov 22, 2011 11:06 AM EST reply actions  

Youre right bobo, it is their job,

however, when they see fit to push programming to their fifth tier location ( ESPN, ESPN2, ESPNU, ESPN alt, ESPN3 being the fifth)

Then not allowing local networks to buy the broadcast and show it, is borderline criminal. And one of the reasons that save UK games, I have completely stopped watching ESPN. They abuse their position not just by denying the programming to other locations, but by not using enough intelligence to know that they can draw better numbers with better teams.

I am now and shall forever be the Cat in The Hat, The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!!!

by Greg Alan Edwards on Nov 25, 2011 9:10 AM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

An exciting community-driven SBNation blog, by and for fans of the Kentucky Wildcats.

Community Guidelines
[UPDATED 01/18/2012]

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Eko_world_small
Coach Cal and His Love for Hair Flare
323_small
N.Y. Times/Pete Thamel / FLW Tour- Nerlens Noel Open
323_small
In Cal We Trust?
Small
Show 'Em The Money
323_small
Richie Farmer: Unforgettable Or Not?
Eko_world_small
Huge Problem for UK FANS
Img_0019_small
Not of general interest.
323_small
The King Is Dead, Long Live The King!
Grover_avatar_small
Reds Fans Upset UK to be Honored at Tonight's Game
Small
Recruiting In 1960's > Limit Was 25 Scholarships

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Twitter Widget -- Follow me!


Managing Editor

Tru_small Glenn Logan

Editor

Derby_024_small BigSkyCat

Fl_family_photo_small Ken Howlett

Author

Small JLeverenz

Justified-olyphant_small jc25

P1000195_small a2d2

Img_0019_small Alex Scutchfield