Kentucky Wildcats Football: Why Maxwell Smith Must Start
Saturday's UK game was a frustrating exercise. Despite winning the turnover battle 3-0 the Cats were unable to capitalize. Offensively, we were forced to settle for field goals on three separate red zone drives and always seemed one step away from making it a game. On defense, Kentucky got no pressure on the quarterback whatsoever and was torched in the passing game by a team that, for all intents and purposes, has no passing game.
As everyone who cares about such things knows by now, one major bright spot for UK was the play of freshman QB Maxwell Smith, who entered the game for good when Morgan Newton suffered a high ankle sprain. Smith completed 26 of 33 passes for a whopping 78.8% completion rate. He wasn't intercepted. Smith didn't win the game, or really come close, nor did he throw for a ton of yards, but there was a lot to like about the performance.
Now its Monday and the Cats have a full blown controversy on their hands. Except I don't find it much of a controversy at all. For myriad reasons, Joker needs to start Smith against the Mississippi Rebels this weekend, and stick with him this season unless and until he proves totally ineffective.
We'll start this discussion with a couple of basic assumptions. One, UK has virtually no chance of going to a bowl this year, a feat that would require winning 3 out of the 4 final games. As it stands, we are 2.5 point home underdogs to Ole Miss, a team that has lost 11 straight SEC games and is by far the weakest team left on the schedule. The second assumption is that Joker is going to keep his job after 2011 no matter what happens. Mitch Barnhart has already made that clear and there is no reason not to take him at his word. The point of this paragraph is that Joker has little to lose at this point.
So, the decision about whether to start Smith or Newton becomes twofold. One, who gives us a better chance to win right now and two, which QB will benefit the program more in the long run by getting the snaps now. Under either measure, I think Smith is the best call.
Morgan Newton's tenure at UK has been rocky at best. Before he took the field, Newton was a god. A lot of BBN thought he should start over Hartline right away and some were relieved when Hartline was injured and Newton took over. Despite throwing for over 100 yards in only 3 of his 8 starts, and completing 60% of his passes only twice, the Cats won 5 games with the true freshman at the helm. Unfortunately, not much has gone right for Newton since.
With Morgan under center, UK sleepwalked through its bowl game in 2010 and had a comically inefficient offense through the first half of this season. Smith has now had one game of significant experience, and it was something less than an unqualified success. But what is clear to me is that the offense has a chance to be successful under Smith in a way that it simply cannot with Newton. Smith throws a catchable ball. On Saturday, he hit receivers in stride and allowed them to run for yardage. Smith also has more confidence and consequently a much faster trigger than Newton. The best way I can describe it though is this: Kentucky looked like it had a semblance of a normal offense on Saturday. Before that, it looked like something designed not to work, sort of like a Billy Gillispie's tenure at UK.
I also think Smith's presence will give the team a lift. There is no question Newton is struggling, and though I have absolutely no way of knowing, it would surprise me if guys aren't pressing behind him or else have simply lost confidence.
As for the future, that's a less controversial question. With this season likely a total bust, the Cats will increasingly find themselves playing for next year. That is particularly true if they lose this Saturday. There is a chance that Newton will lose the chains that appear to bind him in the off season and emerge as a new QB in 2012. Mike Hartline did it. But I'd say that chance at improvement pales in comparison to the chance that Smith makes bigger strides between his freshman and sophomore years. It could go either way, of course, but if you are gambling at who is further from his ceiling and who can benefit more from the reps, the smart money has to be on the true freshman, not the guy who has started 15 games.
Finally, there is this. If UK felt it had a capable backup at any point before the Mississippi State game, that person probably would have already taken Newton's spot. Smith looked more than capable Saturday. It's time to give him a shot.
42 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
It's not like we have anything to lose at this point
Start Smith
Dayman, Fighter of the Nightman, Champion of the Sun
I say give him the ball for the rest of the year.......
let’s see if he can accomplish anything. We sure aren’t going to accomplish anything the other way
I am now and shall forever be the Cat in The Hat, The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!!!
by Greg Alan Edwards on Oct 31, 2011 11:28 AM EDT reply actions
I don't think that's necessary.
Another game or two should tell if he’s ready. As long as he’s more productive than Newton was, I think he should go. If he starts scoring TDs for the other team like he did against USC and LSU, he should go back to the bench.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Glenn Logan on Oct 31, 2011 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions
You dont think it would be worth the investment of the rest of the season to see
what we can truly have for next year?
I am now and shall forever be the Cat in The Hat, The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!!!
by Greg Alan Edwards on Oct 31, 2011 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions
It depends.
Morgan Newton is an investment also.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
True, but when do you cut your losses and sell??
I am now and shall forever be the Cat in The Hat, The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!!!
by Greg Alan Edwards on Oct 31, 2011 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions
Certainly not in a player's junior year, that's for damn sure.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Glenn
Sounds like you come from the Joker Phillips school of logic.
I come from the Glenn Logan school.
It was invented before Joker was born.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
I could not agree more.
I was never a Morgan Newton fan. He never looked impressive when he played for the injured Hartline and he has never looked impressive at any point this year either. His only attribute that is nice is his ability to throw the ball deep. But he’s not accurate so what good is that?
Maxwell Smith, once he shook off the nerves, looked like he knew what he was supposed to be doing. He didn’t dance around like a fool in the pocket. He made quick decisions and threw good, catchable balls for the most part. He also seemed to do the one thing I’ve never seen Newton do… go through his progressions. If his first option isn’t open Newton seems to just freak out and throw the ball away or go straight to the run. He has absolutely no decision making skills whatsoever.
Bring on the Smith!
I forgot to note...
that when Newton freaks out and goes for the run, it’s usually 5-10 yards backwards for a big sack.
by Clint Phelps on Oct 31, 2011 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions
That isn't accurate, I'm afraid.
Newton is the third leading rusher on the team, and is averaging 3.5 yards per attempt, even with sacks included. At least half those sacks are on the O-line.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Glenn Logan on Oct 31, 2011 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions
If our primary rushers were healthy that would be different.
And while I agree that some of the sacks are on the O-line he could have avoided several of them by making a quick decision and getting rid of the ball. He averages 6.6 yards lost per sack with a long of 15 and 5/18 sacks this year losing double digit yardage with a few fumbles thrown in there. It is noteworthy that Smith last a fumble for TD as well against LSU. I still think he’s the better option even as a freshmen.
The gist of my post is really that I just don’t think he’s a good quarterback at all.
by Clint Phelps on Oct 31, 2011 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions
Well ...
… I’ll agree with the idea that Newton has been lousy this year, and that Smith deserves a chance after his performance on Saturday.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Morgan is the man
And if Smith struggles, we should go back to the guy who has been lousy all year? Why should the leash on Max Smith be so much shorter than the leash on Morgan Newton? You’re just like Joker, bending over backwards to make excuses for Morgan’s mistakes.
Reply
You’re just like Joker, bending over backwards to make excuses for Morgan’s mistakes.
No, I’m not making excuses. You don’t change starters at quarterback lightly. It should be an informed, careful decision.
Other positions are less critical. That’s how I see it. If Phillips sees it the same way, then we do think alike on this issue.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
I think this makes sense.
Newton has simply not performed well, and Smith showed signs on Saturday. I think its time for a change.
We pulled Hartline after a few games back during his Junior year, even before he got injured. No reason not to pull Newton for the same reason and give Smith a shot. He may succeed, he may not, but I think he’ll get the chance. We can always go back to Newton if Smith goes into the fetal position.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Sure, start Smith. What's the worst that could happen?
If he reverts to LSU/USC form we put Newton in and hope for a miraculous turnaround.
War is God's way of teaching Americans geography. - Ambrose Bierce
Better that ...
… than letting a not-ready freshman score points for the other team.
Quarterbacking is hard. I hope Smith plays, and succeeds. But you have to admit he might not, and there are worse things, which we have seen.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
fwiw, I dont think we will see that
Snith may not be 100% ready, but he is over the shanks I believe
I am now and shall forever be the Cat in The Hat, The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!!!
by Greg Alan Edwards on Oct 31, 2011 1:04 PM EDT reply actions
If I were going bird hunting
and had the choice to take Newton or Smith, I certainly wouldn’t take Newton. I would fear that I would be as likely to be shot as the bird. Smith on the other hand would probably get his limit very quickly. I think his upside as a quarterback far exceeds the athletically superior Newton.
I woke up feeling BLUE this morning. It's gonna be a great day.
Newton, Smith, Towles
It is my opinion that this season is most likely a waste. It seems improbable that we make a bowl, the best we can hope for, I think, is to finish with some improvement.
That said, how should Joker & Co. handle this potential QB situation long-term? Should we start Smith so that he can get valuable experience for next year? Stick with Newton so that he can improve and have a successful senior season? And what about incoming freshman Towles, who (fair warning- I don’t follow FB recruiting as passionately as BB) is a revered recruit? How does he play into this? Will he come in and start as a freshman?
Joker has a lot of variables in play here. I’m not sure if Newton is ever going to be a great QB. So, should Smith/Towles become the QB of the future?
Rambling, I know. But there is a lot at stake here. I would say that Joker’s job may depend on making the right call here…
by wildcatfaninexile on Oct 31, 2011 2:37 PM EDT reply actions
That will be a lot easier to answer once we get
a larger body of work to judge Smith. On current emotion, I’d go with 1. Smith, 2, Towles, 3. Newton – but, that’s emotion, not facts. Again, we need to see more of Smith to make a more reasoned choice.
War is God's way of teaching Americans geography. - Ambrose Bierce
I'll add one other point
There is certainly a chance that Smith goes out and lays an egg. If so, we can always put Newton back in. Ordinarily, you’d hesitate to make the move first for fear fo hurting the starter’s confidence. I don’t think that is much of a concern here. Unless he is the least self-aware person on the planet, Newton’s confidence is already well shaken.
ALS
by Alex Scutchfield on Oct 31, 2011 2:56 PM EDT reply actions
Boy, I couldn't agree more about his confidence.
Newton simply doesn’t have any right now. He’s got to work on that, and perhaps the backup spot will help him do that.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
It might not hurt.
Maybe seeing the game from the sidelines would allow him to not build it up so much in his head and just go out and play.
ALS
by Alex Scutchfield on Oct 31, 2011 3:54 PM EDT up reply actions
Another reminder ....
That Mossokowski should have gotten a shot in the bowl game last year. I’d like to see how it would have turned out if he was our QB this year and Newton took Cobb’s place.
Thanks for the comment.
Welcome to A Sea of Blue.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
I've seen a few people mention
Newton in a Cobb-like roll but he’s just not a “nifty” runner. He can go north-south pretty well just do to his size but changing directions is not his forte. Tight end is about the only other spot I could see him on offense and even that would be a stretch.
War is God's way of teaching Americans geography. - Ambrose Bierce
Maybe when Newton graduates Joker can hire him as an assistant
Then we can continue our tradtion of having a CIW who is one of our own.
A man is nothing more than a summation of his scars!
I think Joker's in the same spot as Richt was 6 or 7 years ago...
Had a decent QB on the team but when he got hurt he went with the young gun Stafford and look where that got him? Some decent seasons, including bowl wins, and Stafford is playing on Sunday!
The points up-post about “catchable balls” and “investing” is well noted, but Newton hasn’t produced, plain and simple. Blame it on a variety of things, the wind if you want, but he’s not getting it done. Smith came in early in the year and looked like crap, well documented. Came out last Saturday and played a whale of a ball game, stats-wise.
I think he deserves a shot, and while he might have a bad game again, and we may not win ball games, I don’t think he’ll lay an egg like he did earlier. I think his self-confidence is too high right now for that to happen. Some of us were having the same thoughts about Mossy last year, but he never got a shot. If he had, we might not be having this conversation?
As they say, the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result. Joker continuing to start Newton is just that…
If your wings don't sweep....
by EagleTDL on Oct 31, 2011 9:28 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
I have a gut feeling
That the decision has already been made and that everything Joker is saying right now about splitting reps in practice and making a decision on Friday is window dressing.
ALS
by Alex Scutchfield on Nov 1, 2011 9:41 AM EDT reply actions
Hopefully the split is
10% Newton, 90% Smith.
War is God's way of teaching Americans geography. - Ambrose Bierce
QB Competition????
Alex, you’re using way too much logic when you say “If UK felt it had a capable backup at any point before the Mississippi State game, that person probably would have already taken Newton’s spot.”
Joker doesn’t think that way. That’s why he and Randy Sanders have had Max Smith running the scout team offense against Rick Minter’s defense. Anyone else curious why Max would be on the scout team when we have the Russell kid who transferred from EKU and Bookie Cobbins who is red shirting? That should tell you all you need to know about the kind of QB competition that’s been going on in practice. Finding the best QB is the last thing on Joker’s mind and if Morgan had not gotten hurt against Miss State does anyone really believe Max would have gotten anything other than mop up minutes late in the fourth quarter with a no passes restriction?
I guess that is my point.
I don’t think Joker perceived Smith as a viable option before Saturday, though he had given him a couple of chances that, lets face it, he blew. Now, given the way he played against MSU compared to how Newton has played, Joker has to consider him. As for the scout team offense, that might be a case of Joker not thinking the other guys are developed enough to give the defense “a good look”. Who knows.
ALS
by Alex Scutchfield on Nov 1, 2011 6:32 PM EDT up reply actions













