Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Blake Griffin Slam Dunks: NBA Jam Style

Kentucky Wildcats Basketball: Losing Leads and Looking for Leadership

Darius Miller taking charge ... is it a sign?

The Kentucky Wildcats (16-4, 4-2) harder-than-it-should-have-been 66-60 victory over the Georgia Bulldogs (14-6, 3-4) Saturday afternoon in Rupp Arena was two-for-one study in how to build a big lead, and unfortunately, how to nearly blow a big lead.  For the second straight game, UK worked hard and smart to build a comfortable margin, only to see the lead evaporate courtesy of missed shots, missed free throws, and a lack of upperclassmen leadership in the closing minutes of the game.  And although the 'Cats came out winners in both SEC battles, the UK coaching staff and fans alike have reason to reach for the Rolaids while anticipating what fate lies ahead.

But, before we can earnestly evaluate the 'Cats chances of finishing their upcoming two-game road trip (@ Ole Miss and Florida) with a 6-2 mark, let's take a look at what went wrong over the final minutes of the 'Cats last two games, and what the team members need to accomplish in order to alleviate future letdowns.

Star-divide

South Carolina

In UK's 67-58 win over the Gamecocks, the 'Cats held a 61-45 advantage with 4:16 left in the game.  In those final frustrating minutes, UK took and missed four shots, and made 6-8 free throws (one of UK's misses was the front end of a one-and-one).  Carolina, over the same period of time, made 3-7 shots from the field (including one three-pointer), and connected on 6-7 free throws.  Both teams grabbed four defensive rebounds.

Kentucky's mistakes in the final minutes included -- Josh Harrellson committing a senseless foul on Sam Muldrow at the 3:28 mark, resulting in Muldrow making both free throws (John Calipari was so unhappy with Harrellson that he benched him for the remainder of the game).  Second, Doron Lamb fouled the three-point shooter, SC's Eric Smith, with 1:15 remaining and UK up 61-53.  Smith, who had made only 2-15 trey tries (13.3%) up to that point in the season, made all three free throws, bringing Carolina within five points, making it a two possession game.

When the 'Cats should have been padding an already comfortable lead, they were instead outscored by SC 13-6 in the final 4:16.

Georgia

Against the Bulldogs, and after playing one of their best halves of the season the first 20 minutes, UK held a 52-38 lead with 11:25 remaining in the game.  In the second half of the second stanza, the 'Cats played surprisingly indifferent, and uninspired basketball, evidenced by this -- UK made only 3-11 shots from the floor (27.3%), after making 19-40 shots from the field (47.5%) the opening 28:35 of the contest.  The 'Cats also made only 8-13 free throws (61.5%), and grabbed zero offensive rebounds in eight opportunities.  

Georgia, while making only 7-22 shots from the field (31.8%), including two made three-pointers, hit the boards like junkyard dogs after a bloody T-Bone, snagging seven offensive boards, which resulted in seven second chance points.  You read that right; seven offensive rebounds on fifteen misses, a 46.7 offensive rebounding percentage.  That, sports fans, is unacceptable.  For comparisons sake, and to thoroughly drive the point home that the 'Cats were not a focused group at the end of the game -- Over the first 28:35 of the contest, UGA had three offensive rebounds on 19 misses (15.8%)

In a game in which the first half of action was dominated by the boys in blue -- the 'Cats found themselves up 39-24 in spite of  their leading scorer, Terrence Jones, playing only seven minutes due to foul trouble -- they simply allowed the more aggressive Bulldogs back in the contest, giving the Dogs hope.  And hope is exactly what a team on top does not want to give the team with the boot pressed firmly on their neck.  Instead of grinding their collective heel into the carotid artery of the Dogs, UK flinched, and began back-peddling, leaving their killer instinct on the sideline. 

Want more, well I have more -- With UK being outscored 22-14 by Georgia (in the last 11:35), and 13-6 by South Carolina (in the last 4:16), the 'Cats, in the combined final 15:51 of the two games, were bested by a count of 35-20.

The On-Going Saga: Searching for Leadership

After the Georgia game, UK coach John Calipari had these thoughts on why the 'Cats are suddenly allowing teams back into the game, as well as who he expects to step-up at crunch time:  

"We missed some free throws.  Two plays we broke off that we were not trying to do.  And that's what happens with a young team.  But one of the things I said, this team has to be about Darius (Miller), DeAndre (Liggins) and Josh (Harrellson), our juniors and seniors.  It's got to be about them, what they accept, what they affect, and they have to be the guys making plays down the stretch, not freshmen.  If our freshmen happen to do it, fine.  But we can't count on those guys; they are freshmen.  Get me those upper classmen."

" You (the upperclassmen) must be the tough guys.  You've got to make the tough plays.  You're not missing a rebound, can't be.  That's one.  Two, you've got to be really strong with the ball so you're not getting balls ripped out of your hands, like not happening, and you're making easy plays.  And then all of a sudden, you make that big block, you get that big rebound, you dive on the floor and get the ball and make that charge."

Calipari is obviously looking for heightened production from his three upperclassmen in end-game situations.  Here is why -- In the final 4:16 of the SC game, plus, the final 11:35 of the Georgia game, Cal's three would-be, should-be leaders floundered their way to the following numbers: D. Miller -- 0-2 field goals, 2-2 free throws, three defensive rebounds, two turnovers, and two points.  D. Liggins -- 0-2 field goals, 2-2 free throws, two defensive rebounds, one turnover, one steal, two points.  J. Harrellson -- Three defensive rebounds, 0-1 free throws, zero points.

Combined, the three upperclassmen scored four points, were 0-4 from the field, made 4-5 free throws, and grabbed eight defensive rebounds.  Paltry production, indeed.

Darius Miller, when asked if the freshmen mistakes were the reason Georgia reduced UK's lead, responded:

"Honestly, it isn't really on the freshmen, it's all of us; me, DeAndre (Liggins), and Josh (Harrellson) included.  We have spurts where we play really well and then there are times where we let down.  We have to fix that as a team, not just the freshmen.  It also has to do with us playing the whole forty minutes and not in spurts, so it kind of rubs off on the younger guys, so it is something we need to work on."

Spoken like a legitimate leader.  Now though, will Miller, in spite of his recent less-than-determined late-game production, execute like the leader his coach is searching for?

Perhaps, and here's why -- A positive sign Miller has decided to take a more active role in the offense are his impressive numbers over the last five games -- Miller is averaging 13.8 points per game, scoring in double-figures in five straight contests.  After averaging 6.6 shots per game through UK's first 14 games of the year, Miller, over the last six games -- which perhaps, not coincidently, coincides with the start of SEC play -- is averaging 10.2 shots per game.  And Miller isn't just taking more shots, he is doing what leaders do, he's making more shots: In his last five games, the Maysville native has made an outstanding 27-50 overall shots (54.0%), after making 46.2% of his shots through the teams first 15 games.  During the same time-frame, Miller has made 7-18 three-point shots (38.9%), but even more promising, he has made 20-32 two-point attempts (62.5%).

Based on these numbers, Miller certainly seems to be elevating his game, becoming a more assertive, consistent Darius Miller, something his coach and fans have been clamoring for since his arrival in Lexington.  Whether that mindset segues into Miller becoming the leader the 'Cats are thirsting for remains to be seen, but the foreshadowing of such an event seems to be present.

But, with road games at Ole Miss and league-leading Florida looming large on the horizon, time is waning for Miller to take the leap from shy, unselfish-to-a-fault Mildcat, to take-charge, win-at-all-cost Wildcat.

Thanks for reading and Go 'Cats!

Comment 66 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Liggins and Harrelson

For all his defensive prowess, Liggins has just got to find ways to finish his drive to the basket. He’s missed so many layups in the last two games (wish I had the stats) that the Cats could have won each game easily, not the hard-fought manner they did.

Harrelson has got to get back to owning the boards, defensive and offensive. He will encounter big-time opposition on the glass at UF facing Macklin and the guy who used to have long hair.

by jdogblue on Jan 31, 2011 8:25 AM EST reply actions  

I agree with this

Liggins has a surprisingly consistent tendency to miss layups, which is frustrating. He just has trouble putting the ball in the hoop by any means, when it comes down to it.

Harrelson had a great stretch where he was always battling for rebounds and doing a great job. His intensity on rebounding has been much more lackluster recently, IMO. And looking horrible on wide open shots (and a virtual disappearance of any offense) is not encouraging either.

by kcgard2 on Jan 31, 2011 5:28 PM EST up reply actions  

You made some great points

as to how the Cats blew the leads in the two games but there is another factor to be considered, the other team we are playing.

Too often UK fans approach the game results as we could have, we should have, and so on. There is almost an assumption that we have total control over the results and that is not so. There are five more players on the court trying to accomplish the same thing we are, victory. While we almost always have an advantage in talent, we do not always have an advantage in teamwork, experience, coaching and motivation. If the game of basketball were always won by the best team what would be the point in watching. Last weekends plethora of upsets proves the point and demonstrates that college basketball is the best game there is.

Can UK do better? Absolutely. Will the other teams lay down before us and surrender? Never. Will there be close games and losses? Inevitably. As long as we stay in the real world and realize that it is not totally in our control, our observations of what happens will be more valid.

I woke up feeling BLUE this morning. It's gonna be a great day.

by kywineman on Jan 31, 2011 9:03 AM EST reply actions  

While I certainly agree that what the opposition does

can have an effect on UK’s gameplan, I really don’t think that is the case here. This year’s team, just like last year’s team, is full of freshmen who tend to relax a bit when they have a big lead, allowing the other team back into the game. That’s the problem as I see it. In neither game did the opposing team make any dramatic changes as far as strategy is concerned, UK simply did not continue to put forth the effort that gained them the lead, which, as I stated earlier, is typical of freshmen.

by Ken Howlett on Jan 31, 2011 9:31 AM EST up reply actions  

I want to clarify a point

I made. I said that it is not totally in our control and I meant the results. What is in our control is focus and effort. If we play with the same all out effort as our opponents then our advantage in talent can be utilized. I do take away some comfort that we have held off our opponents comebacks in the last two games and hope we build on that.

I woke up feeling BLUE this morning. It's gonna be a great day.

by kywineman on Jan 31, 2011 10:03 AM EST up reply actions  

I don't know if UK is blowing leads because they relax

Or because they tighten up.

With last year’s team it was obvious- they’d get to a point where they felt comfortable, relax, and suddenly find themselves in a tight contest. The past couple of games, it seemed more like UK got a lead, then played exceptionally slow and nervous offensively, just waiting for the clock to run out and the game to end.

I’m hoping that was simply a function of situation, as UK was staggering a little from the 2-2 SEC start, and knew that a loss to either SC or Georgia would put them way behind the 8 ball. They should go back and watch the 2nd half of the Louisville game, which was a textbook example of how to keep the ball moving and the offense in sync, while holding off a comeback attempt. Playing slow and playing smart are not necessarily synonymous, and if you take what was an effective offense in one half and throw it out of sync by slowing it down the next half, its counterproductive.

by mjj_001 on Jan 31, 2011 3:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Spot On, Kywineman

In both instances (Cocks & Dawgs) — and underlying factor could be fatigue or youth but that’s beside the point — UK’s early performance and late fade were the result of the Blue being unable or unwilling to match opponents’ late increased intensity. IOW, getting punched in mouth and not countering. I do believe coaching staff bears some responsibility due to the increased emphasis put on a quick start following UGA and Bama losses — 40 minutes of focused play is probably beyond the realm for a team as inexperienced (even the upperclassmen are relatively inexperienced as far as crimch time is concerned*) as 2010-11 Cats.

*Neither Miller, Liggins and especially Harrellson have been required to lead at the D1 level. Oddly enough it appears to me that Doron Lamb has the most leadership potential (ah, there’s that word again).

"I bring reason to your ears, and, in language as plain as ABC, hold up truth to your eyes." Thomas Paine, December 23, 1776

by Wild Weasel on Jan 31, 2011 9:44 AM EST up reply actions  

Yet another take

Great points Ken. However, I think we might be looking too hard for explanations regarding our team’s less than stellar second half play of late when the simple truth might be that, with a six man rotation, our guys are just wearing out down the stretch. Good coaches substitute liberally during games to ensure that their best players are on the court and fresh for the game’s final crucial minutes. With no bench to speak of, Cal is unable to enjoy this luxury, and guys like Knight and Liggens—who literally bust their a** for the entire game— find themselves matched up down the stretch with players who are better rested and more energized. Although our guys might have more talent, the more rested and energized players (with the fresher legs) are more likley to shoot better, run faster, defend harder, and crash the boards more aggresively, therby giving themselves a huge advantage during crunch time.

Leadership is undeniably important. However, all the yelling, prodding, and encouragement from our older players can only go so far when our primary ballhandlers/playmakers are simply worn out.

by tooblue on Jan 31, 2011 9:20 AM EST reply actions  

Knight and Ligs are the only two players averaging over 30 mpg

This team is in phenomenal shape, so I have a hard time believing, at this point in the year, that the 6-7 man rotation is causing the guys to lose steam. But, when tourney time rolls around, with the team playing back-to-back games, fatigue could become an issue.

by Ken Howlett on Jan 31, 2011 9:35 AM EST up reply actions  

tooblue: Calipari on DMiller's minutes

During today’s media op, Cal talked about decreasing DM’s minutes. Larry Vaught wrote about it on his blog.

by Ken Howlett on Jan 31, 2011 5:52 PM EST up reply actions  

PS

What’s the deal with Poole? Can anyone fill me in on why he can’t seem to get any playing time this year. Is he really that overmatched and, if so, how could our coaches not have seen this before signing him.

by tooblue on Jan 31, 2011 9:25 AM EST reply actions  

He's obviously not doing something Cal and staff are looking for

but I would not make any sweeping judgments on him yet. Typically, over the last 40 years, frosh don’t play much. But since the arrival of Cal, and the onslaught of freakishly talented freshman, we’ve become spoiled, and if a guy isn’t getting playing time, e.g. Poole and Hood, we automatically think they were a recruiting mistake. Your question, though, is certainly valid, because there is no doubt UK could use both of those guys, if only for 5-10 mpg, to offset the possibility of what you brought up in your post above.

by Ken Howlett on Jan 31, 2011 9:42 AM EST up reply actions  

I think Cal saw Poole as an Antonio Anderson/DeAndre Liggins type

That is, a muscular wing player with good athleticism, raw offensively, but capable of guarding multiple positions on D. Cal loves those type of guys, and its part of the reason he was so eager to keep Liggins around, despite how easy it would have been to cut him loose.

Poole’s offensive game is so raw that he’s going to have to be a defensive force to contribute, and I don’t think Cal feels like he’s getting a great effort from him on that end of the court. If Poole wants to play at UK, he’s going to have to dedicate himself to playing fierce defense, because there are always going to be more skilled offensive players in front of him.

by mjj_001 on Jan 31, 2011 2:38 PM EST up reply actions  

This is something I saw in a posted video clip...

(I can’t find the clip or I’d link it.) The clip, about 3 minutes long, was about Kanter working out with Cal (and the other frontcourt players) after the final NCAA decision preparing for his NBA debut. But, in the background you could see Poole, Hood and Knight doing a standard defensive stance line touch drill. In that drill Poole’s footwork was ragged, his stance was not low – nearly vertical, his hands were down and he was slow, constantly lagging the other guys as the group moved back and forth between the two lines. Honestly, in that clip, it looked like he knew beans about playing defense and could care less. If that admittedly small clip was typical of his practice I’m not surprised he isn’t getting any minutes and he’s lucky he’s got a scholarship.

by TeamWeaver on Jan 31, 2011 2:51 PM EST up reply actions  

I think this is right.

He has to commit to defense first. Just doesn’t have the skill yet to command playing time offensively.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Feb 1, 2011 8:35 AM EST up reply actions  

We should be careful not to hold

every recruit that comes in to the John Wall/Cousins standard. Poole may need four years to reach his potential and that is not a bad thing. It is only so obvious right now because of our short bench. In the long run we have to have the Millers, Harrelsons, Liggins and hopefully the Pooles in order to develop bench depth and strength through experience. Let us not judge too quickly.

I woke up feeling BLUE this morning. It's gonna be a great day.

by kywineman on Jan 31, 2011 11:52 AM EST up reply actions  

Thanks

I wasn’t passing judgement on him…and you are right that, since Cal’s arrival, I have been spoiled (a lot) by the incredible players he has brought in. I just remember watching Poole’s dad play, and keep hoping that his son can give us some quality minutes off the bench to give some of our starters some much needed rest.

by tooblue on Jan 31, 2011 10:01 AM EST reply actions  

Poole's pops

He was a heckuva good player … hated him! j/k

LOL, what’s funny, is that I was thinking the exact same thing when Cal signed him ions ago>

by Ken Howlett on Jan 31, 2011 10:06 AM EST up reply actions  

Just FWIW

But the younger Poole looked out of sorts during warm-ups in Columbia SC. No idea why.

I think it’s a big leap from his HS competition in Jax FL to UK caliber of play.

by FortyYearCatFan on Jan 31, 2011 11:45 AM EST up reply actions  

He had bad body language in Louisville at the Notre Dame game as well.

I don’t think he’s happy buried on the bench, and if I had to bet on it, I’d be inclined to bet that he transfers.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Feb 1, 2011 8:37 AM EST up reply actions  

Didn't Interact Much With Teammates In Columbia

Seemed to warm up / practice on his own. Certainly a transfer possibility.

by FortyYearCatFan on Feb 1, 2011 11:46 AM EST up reply actions  

Leadership

Of the three mentioned,Miller,Liggins and Harrellson, Miller has the best chance of being the player to provide the needed leadership IMO. While Liggins is a great defensive player he isn’t really much of an offensive threat and the last thing I want to see him do is trying to take control of a game,especially late. Plus he is a inconsistent free throw shooter at best. Harrellson may be a veteran player as far as time spent at UK but he is far from it when it comes to actual minutes played during his career. Although he may be a freshman,the player I want to have the ball late is Lamb. He shoots the ball well,is a good free throw shooter and just seems to have a lot of poise.

by maysvilleblue on Jan 31, 2011 10:03 AM EST reply actions  

yes............

u rso righttttttt!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Go CATTTTTTTTTTTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by oilliecat on Jan 31, 2011 12:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Say what you will about these lead losses, but it has happened less often that last year.

Last year’s team used to build 15 point leads every game then loose them, even fall behind, and come back. Or they gave up big leads and had to do the coming back.

This year’s team seems to get the lead, let teams within striking distance, but aren’t giving up the lead very often. UGa got no closer than 6. USC no closer than 5.

Unncecessarily close, but still better than the up and down of last year’s team.

by JackBluto on Jan 31, 2011 10:03 AM EST reply actions  

Bluto, you are of course spot on

I’m just trying to cut off this horse at the pass :)

by Ken Howlett on Jan 31, 2011 10:07 AM EST up reply actions  

I'm in favor of that.

I just remember being even more frustrated last year. Of course, we have already lost more than last year, so there is something to be said for that team we had last year. They may have been pretty good. :)

by JackBluto on Jan 31, 2011 10:16 AM EST up reply actions  

Last years team...

was very good and I know they spoiled me. I try not to compare this years team to them.

by maysvilleblue on Jan 31, 2011 10:46 AM EST up reply actions  

RIGHT!

I 2ND, THAT…….

Go CATTTTTTTTTTTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by oilliecat on Jan 31, 2011 12:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Last year's team

did not play as difficult a preconference schedule as this year’s. It now appears that our worst loss was Alabama and if they keep winning even that won’t be so bad. Louisville is playing surprisingly well, UNC is starting to look better, N.D., UConn and others are not having bad years so we have had some good wins and some losses that aren’t hurting us that badly.

I woke up feeling BLUE this morning. It's gonna be a great day.

by kywineman on Jan 31, 2011 11:46 AM EST up reply actions  

Excatly right about the Bama loss

So far it’s the worse loss but not looking as bad as it did at the time. I was never all that concerned about the UNC loss because I felt like the Tar Heels would make the NCAA this year and it looks like they will. They are in the top 25 this week.

by maysvilleblue on Jan 31, 2011 3:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Leaders are born unfortunately and not made IMO

Having worked out in the real world and enduring many so called leaders who had the correct credentials and having the latest leadership training courses – I can tell you it isn’t that simple. A real leader naturally just steps up and is recognized by leading by example, he doesn’t demand respect, he acquires it naturally. A real leader may not even be aware of his course of action – its just an ingrained ability, part of his or hers DNA. Its really that simple.
I do not see one person on this team other then possibly Lamb who comes close.
My two cents worth..!

A man is nothing more than a summation of his scars!

by KansasUKCat on Jan 31, 2011 11:58 AM EST reply actions  

I disagree with that kind of thinking...

and believe it to be a jaded view of an inept corporate system that most of America endorses. I firmly believe leaders can be made/grown into their roles, but the area in which you are looking for leadership comparisons is the worst possible place to find it – the people put into leadership positions are placed there based on experience and skill, not on interest/desire (or natural ability) to lead others, and given no real incentive to learn to do so. A recipe for failure.

by dshnarw on Jan 31, 2011 8:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Welcome to 21st century America

A man is nothing more than a summation of his scars!

by KansasUKCat on Feb 1, 2011 9:26 AM EST up reply actions  

If this is true about leaders being born

not made, then why do we have ROTC, the service acadamies and so on? While we may be born with leadership qualities they have to be developed and refined through experience and education.

I woke up feeling BLUE this morning. It's gonna be a great day.

by kywineman on Jan 31, 2011 8:19 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't agree.

Leaders are born with a disposition to lead, but it is not a required trait. I have seen the most unlikely people become leaders.

Lack of a “leadership gene” is something that can be overcome, just like almost everything else.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Feb 1, 2011 8:38 AM EST up reply actions  

On this current team

Do you or anyone else believe that just “any player” of this group can be selected by Cal and told you are now the leader – go out and do it. Or would this quasi leader have to manifest the required traits on the court and win the respect of his peers. This is standing out from the crowd and is part of the natural selection process.
Thats what I’m trying to imply. Not just anyone of this group can be that leader by random selection.

A man is nothing more than a summation of his scars!

by KansasUKCat on Feb 1, 2011 9:49 AM EST up reply actions  

KansasUKCat

I definitely Do Not think a coach can appoint a player as leader. But obviously, Cal sees something in Miller which makes him think he can lead, if it only means him being more assertive and aggressive in the final minutes of a game.

by Ken Howlett on Feb 1, 2011 2:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Glenn

 During my 36 years in the work force. I saw it both ways, some of the people tapped to be leaders didn’t have a clue. In todays industry on the union side all it takes is seniority. On the company side it is called “SUCK” Plain and simple!

Happy Days are here again! Wildcat's have #1 recruiting class again!

by oldcat73 on Feb 1, 2011 2:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Leadership is a tricky thing

It’s clearly important, yet I think it’s difficult to express exactly why or how. I think back to various clubs and organizations I’ve been in and some people who were great leaders, but if you asked me to explain what made them great and what difference it made I would be hard put to come up with anything that didn’t sound like a lame answer.

I wonder how much say Cal really has here. I read his comments as trying to nudge one of those guys to actively assume that mantle, it’s not something he can just give to them and expect the rest of the team to fall in line.

3 > 2, except for very large values of 2.

by JLeverenz on Jan 31, 2011 1:08 PM EST reply actions  

Thats exactly correct - people gravitate toward natural leaders

Wall last year was that undisputed leader and it came with his natural ability to lead by example as much as his innate skill set which was secondary.

A man is nothing more than a summation of his scars!

by KansasUKCat on Jan 31, 2011 1:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Cats #10 & 11

UK 10 on AP, 11 in Coaches’.

http://m.espn.go.com/ncb/rankings?pollId=1

"I bring reason to your ears, and, in language as plain as ABC, hold up truth to your eyes." Thomas Paine, December 23, 1776

by Wild Weasel on Jan 31, 2011 1:55 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

Why did Purdue move up two spots on coaches poll

They got hammered by Ohio State on 1/25/10, but did beat Tubby’s team and moved from 12th to 10th..?

Strange thinking by the coaches – I guess they don’t know squat.

A man is nothing more than a summation of his scars!

by KansasUKCat on Jan 31, 2011 5:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Not really surprising...

Most of the pollsters penalize a team much less for losing to a team that is ranked higher than them, as in this case. Combined with all the other craziness in the top 25, they didn’t so much move up 2 spots as stay stationary while others fell below them.

by dshnarw on Jan 31, 2011 7:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Boilers Are 18-4

Deserving of Top 10 (I think). KenPom rates them highly also.

by FortyYearCatFan on Jan 31, 2011 9:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Harrellson in SEC play...

GA 4pts. 11/5 rebs.
AU 8 pts. 4/2 rebs.
LSU 2 pts. 14/5 rebs.
AL 3 pts. 9/5 rebs.
SC 2 pts. 5/2 rebs.
GA 4 pts. 8/1 rebs.

I think his performance in the OOC schedule and particularly the Louisville game inflated my/our perception of Josh’s abilities beyond reality. We’ve been talking about the tentative play and lack of focus by the backcourt but, for my money, the reason our second halves have been so poor sits squarely on the shoulders of one Jorts.

by TeamWeaver on Jan 31, 2011 3:19 PM EST reply actions  

Not sure I agree

His game against the Cards was a once in a lifetime performance plus a lot of credit has to go to T. Jones for recognizing the double team plus poor coaching by RP for not changing his game plan to stop him. I’m not taking anything away from how hard he has worked and I have been pleasantly surprised but I don’t think we will see anything like his performance against UL again.

by maysvilleblue on Jan 31, 2011 8:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Maybe not squarely...

but our abysmal production in the low post undeniably leaves us vulnerable to teams with a strong inside presence. That, and a thin bench, will likely spell our demise come tournament time.

No reason we can’t enjoy the ride though.

by tooblue on Jan 31, 2011 3:36 PM EST reply actions  

Not Fooled

Never bought into the amazing transformation theory of Harrellson, in fact I predicted (accurately it appears) considerable decline in his numbers after SEC play began. Harrellson’s best offer out of HS was Western Illinois and that’s an accurate metric of his talent. That he’s in the starting lineup of a top 10 team is a testimony to his hard work and advantageous use of opportunity.

"I bring reason to your ears, and, in language as plain as ABC, hold up truth to your eyes." Thomas Paine, December 23, 1776

by Wild Weasel on Jan 31, 2011 7:19 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

That would be

the opportunity.

I woke up feeling BLUE this morning. It's gonna be a great day.

by kywineman on Jan 31, 2011 8:20 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't know

His job is to rebound, and JH is 5th in rebounding in SEC games only, and third in offensive rebounds per game.

by Ken Howlett on Jan 31, 2011 8:53 PM EST up reply actions  

That was impolite, Forty.

Please discontinue that kind of comment.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Feb 1, 2011 8:40 AM EST up reply actions  

Tone, Yes

But it’s clear that the poster doesn’t have a favorable view of Harrellson based on his HS play.

I think Harrellson has improved GREATLY since then and especially since last year.

He’s not great but he’s the best C on UK roster by far.

by FortyYearCatFan on Feb 1, 2011 11:47 AM EST up reply actions  

Ditto Others In UK History And Lore

Thad Jaracz in 1966 to name one.

Harrellson is a better C than any other UK option. Calipari expected KANTER to be his C.

by FortyYearCatFan on Jan 31, 2011 9:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

An exciting community-driven SBNation blog, by and for fans of the Kentucky Wildcats.

Community Guidelines
[UPDATED 01/18/2012]

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Eko_world_small
Coach Cal and His Love for Hair Flare
323_small
N.Y. Times/Pete Thamel / FLW Tour- Nerlens Noel Open
323_small
In Cal We Trust?
Small
Show 'Em The Money
323_small
Richie Farmer: Unforgettable Or Not?
Eko_world_small
Huge Problem for UK FANS
Img_0019_small
Not of general interest.
323_small
The King Is Dead, Long Live The King!
Grover_avatar_small
Reds Fans Upset UK to be Honored at Tonight's Game
Small
Recruiting In 1960's > Limit Was 25 Scholarships

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Twitter Widget -- Follow me!


Managing Editor

Tru_small Glenn Logan

Editor

Derby_024_small BigSkyCat

Fl_family_photo_small Ken Howlett

Author

Small JLeverenz

Justified-olyphant_small jc25

P1000195_small a2d2

Img_0019_small Alex Scutchfield