Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Why Hockey Fans Should Root For Devils Vs. Kings

Kentucky Wildcats Basketball: Offensively Speaking

Statistics.  Some live by them, some aren't interested in them.  But, there is no denying, in college basketball today, there is considerably more tracking of various types of statistics than ever before.  It is not quite to "baseball level" yet, but when one considers only 32 years ago blocked shots were not kept by the scorekeeper, the explosion of roundball stats in the last 15-20 years is quite evident.  And due to the all-encompassing nature of statistics today, they can be a great gauge of how ones team is performing, telling us why they are winning, or why they are losing.

Although stats are not the final authority on why a team is successful or not -- team chemistry, and coaching decisions are just two important aspects of a teams performance which stats do not directly confront -- they are, though, an excellent reflection of those two all-important categories, as well as other intangible performance metrics.

When looking at stats, one has to remember that the primary goal of any offense is to allow the team to be as efficient as possible in putting the ball in the basket.  All offenses are designed, based on personnel, to gain the team the highest percentage shot possible; ideally a layup, or wide-open three.  And defensively, the goal of any team is to disrupt the oppositions ability to be efficient.  Do this successfully, and the team will win much more often than they lose.

With that in mind, let us take a look at the categories I deem the most important when studying your favorite team's offensive statistics ... after the jump.

Star-divide

The Offense

Offensively, the most important statistic when evaluating a team's efficiency is its points per possession.  In other words, how many points does the team score versus the number of possessions they have during the course of the game.  Sub-categories of this efficiency rating is the team's effective field goal percentage (eFG%) -- eFG% is a marriage of a team's two and three-point accuracy, with weight given to the three-point shot because it is worth more: Example -- If a player makes 5-10 shots from the field, he made 50.0% of his FG attempts, but if two of the player's makes are trifectas, meaning he scored 12 points on his 10 shots, that equates to an eFG% of 60.0% (or 6-10 two-point shots) --  its turnover percentage, and finally, its offensive rebound percentage.

Kentucky, through 19 games this year, is averaging 1.14 points per possession, which is good for 17th in the nation and leads the SEC.  Although UK's overall field goal percentage is 45.9% (77th, 5th), their eFG% is 52.5% (61st, 3rd) due to the 'Cats' ability to make the three-pointer at a very high rate (40.2%; 13th, 1st), and take, for the most part, good shots.  Also contributing to UK's outstanding points per possession number is the team's turnover percentage, which checks-in at 16.3% (9th, 1st); thanks in large part to the strong ball-handling and decision-making of the teams primary ball-handlers.

The other, just as important factor in a team having a strong points per possession number is the aforementioned offensive rebound percentage -- Keeping alive the possession with an offensive rebound increases the chances of points being scored on that possession.  Rebounding in general is an area of concern for UK fans and the coaching staff alike this season -- With the presence of only two "big men" who contribute major minutes, the 'Cats have been forced to "gang rebound" in order to stay competitive with teams blessed with more bulky length.  But, taking that into consideration, UK has performed quite well in the offensive rebounding sub-category -- The 'Cats are grabbing 36.8% of their available offensive rebounds, which is 53rd in the nation, and 6th in the SEC. 

Directly related to UK's offensive rebound percentage is the team's second chance points numbers, which gives us a good idea of how effectively the 'Cats are scoring after grabbing an offensive board.  This year, UK has scored 264 second chance points, or 13.9 points per game.  For comparisons sake -- Kentucky's opposition are averaging 11.4 second chance points per game, giving the 'Cats a slight 2.5 point per game advantage in second chance points.

Along with UK's rebounding, concern for the 'Cats' points in the paint numbers are of great interest to fans this year.  When dissecting these numbers, though, one has to keep in mind that Kentucky is an outstanding three-point shooting team, meaning their points in the paint may suffer a bit. 

On the year, UK has scored 1,495 points in 19 games (78.7 points per game), 610 of which have come via points in the paint, or 40.8% of their overall point production.  The opposition have scored 498 points in the paint (out of an overall 1,177 points), far fewer than the 'Cats, but at a higher percentage at 42.3%.  So, while the 'Cats have been outscored in the paint on a percentage basis, it is a relatively small discrepancy, especially when considering all of the hand-wringing by the fan base at the thought of UK's lack of productive big men.

** In UK's loss to UConn in Maui, the Huskies pulverized the 'Cats in the paint, winning that battle 42-18 (50% of UConn's points).  North Carolina also took the interior 'Cats to the woodshed by a 34-14 margin (45.3% of UNC's points).  But, in UK's other two losses, versus Georgia and Alabama, Kentucky outscored the two teams in the paint by a combined score of 68-60.

Cliffs Notes Analysis

Overall, Kentucky's offensive efficiency is very strong.  As a team, they don't turn the ball over at a high rate, they shoot the ball from the floor quite efficiently -- especially from long range -- and they do an exceptional job of offensive rebounding, and then take advantage of their second chances by scoring the ball.  All of these metrics have contributed to UK's 15-4 start to the season, and with some improvement, could carry the 'Cats a long way in the post season.  But, as is always true, tournament match-ups are the determining factor in exactly how far a team travels on its way to the Final Four.  And with so few dominant big men roaming the floor in college basketball today, coupled with UK's strong guard play -- always important in the NCAA Tourney -- the 'Cats, even with a short bench, will probably have the opportunity to make some noise in the Big Dance.

Announcement

Beginning next Wednesday, February 2, I will be joining Norm Haney and BC Thomas to talk UK athletics every Wednesday from 5-6 pm EST on 1340 WBGN in Bowling Green.  Of course the show will be streamed live over the Internet.  We will have on the show an impressive list of guests visiting each week.  And this summer the show will be available on radios throughout the state of Kentucky.  

I will have broadcast links and more information on each show as we go forward.

Thanks for reading and Go 'Cats!

Comment 34 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Nice Post, Ken

Insightful. I wonder if we’ll ever be able to look at/compare the statistical variance of some of these numbers across games or next to other teams to get a sense of how “consistently” we play. It strikes me that we’ve played consistenly well offensively this season, and maybe not so much defensively . . . except of course, for Liggins.

by Big Blue Daddy on Jan 25, 2011 10:38 PM EST reply actions  

Thanks a lot Big Blue

Your point is good about the consistency of UK’s play. I think UK has, since their return from Maui played fairly consistently. But, as with any team that starts three frosh, inconsistency is always a concern.

by Ken Howlett on Jan 26, 2011 1:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Cats and Dogs

On an only sllightly related note, we better have our defensive and offensive A games ready for UGA after they lost at home to the Gators in Double OT. Let me suggest that they will be desperate and that Fox will have them loaded for bear. Also, one more vote for the foul on a 3-point lead with scant seconds left.

by Big Blue Daddy on Jan 25, 2011 10:53 PM EST reply actions  

Good Intention

I think it was Mark Fox’s intention to foul Walker but poor execution or excellent avoidance by Walker — Lighins’ assignment when Cats meet Gators. Much the same story of Calipari vs KU.

"I bring reason to your ears, and, in language as plain as ABC, hold up truth to your eyes." Thomas Paine, December 23, 1776

by Wild Weasel on Jan 26, 2011 12:49 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Walker said after the game that the reason he pulled up so deep – with a couple of seconds on the clock, plenty of time to get to the arc – was because he expected to be fouled. Definitely a tactical mistake by UGA.

by peachy rex on Jan 26, 2011 6:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Ken

Does an offensive rebound start a new possesion? If you can clarify this, I might do better on the GOG.

"SPORTS"--Not interested----"CATS"--Pull up a chair,I've got all night.

by kydamcat on Jan 25, 2011 11:22 PM EST reply actions  

Nope.

A possession only ends on a defensive rebound, field goal, common foul (not an intentional foul where the possessing team gets the ball or technical foul where play is resumed at the point of interruption), violation or turnover.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Jan 26, 2011 9:10 AM EST up reply actions  

It's helpful to think of a possession in basketball like an at bat in baseball

An offensive rebound is kind of like fouling off a pitch.

3 > 2, except for very large values of 2.

by JLeverenz on Jan 26, 2011 10:49 AM EST up reply actions  

Thanks to both of you

JL, are you anywhere near posting the Georgia GOG? We are dying out here. I’ve read everything I can find on the net, read ASOB a dozen times. I need a fix. One thing I do know, off weeks suck bigtime.

"SPORTS"--Not interested----"CATS"--Pull up a chair,I've got all night.

by kydamcat on Jan 26, 2011 9:33 PM EST up reply actions  

It'll be up on Friday

Look for it in the latter part of the afternoon

3 > 2, except for very large values of 2.

by JLeverenz on Jan 27, 2011 1:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Hi Ken

Congratulations on the new gig. I look forward to it. Another good article. I am not big on stats but alway read anyway. At my age numbers mean you are a year older. But the alternative is they bury you! Good Night!

Happy Days are here again! Wildcat's have #1 recruiting class again!

by oldcat73 on Jan 26, 2011 1:27 AM EST reply actions  

Thanks oldcat70

I’m really looking forward to the gig. It should be fun.

by Ken Howlett on Jan 26, 2011 1:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Nice post Ken.

I’ll be listening on Wednesday nights!

And next Wednesday night (the 2nd) is my birthday, in case you want to give a shout out to a brother! ;)

by bob in bg on Jan 26, 2011 11:14 AM EST reply actions  

This is a good rundown Ken

I don’t know if I’ll be able to listen, are the shows or segments archived anywhere?

3 > 2, except for very large values of 2.

by JLeverenz on Jan 26, 2011 12:33 PM EST reply actions  

Thanks, JLev

I’ll have to check and see if the shows will be archived. I’m not really sure. But I’ll let you know.

by Ken Howlett on Jan 26, 2011 1:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Don't forget free throws.

“All offenses are designed, based on personnel, to gain the team the highest percentage shot possible; ideally a layup, or wide-open three.”

I’m with you on the layup (or dunk). That’s very high percentage. But I’d much rather be shooting FTs than wide-open threes. Agreed?

UK shoots 40% from three. Nice. Ranks 13th in the nation. But we also shoot 70% from the line, which is 10% more efficient. That’s significant. If we can get there often enough, that’s the place to be.

Jones takes fully 1/3 of our team’s FTs! And at 65%, he’s not very good. But that’s still better than 40% from beyond the arc. Even Liggins’ embarrassing 59% from the line is a match for our team’s nice percentage from three.

Knight (78%), Lamb (83%) and especially Miller (83%) must get to the line more. Jones takes nearly five times more FTs than Miller. If our better FT shooters can take some of those attempts, we’d be more efficient still.

To be clear, I’m not setting up a false choice between taking threes and shooting FTs. We score only 15.7 points per game from line, which ranks 103rd. So I’d like to trade some of our good 49% 2-PT shooting for 70% shooting from the stripe. But if you’re talking about the highest percentage shot possible, let’s not forget those uncontested ones from 15 feet. (13’ 9" to the center of the rim, not including elevation)

by Wheatgerm on Jan 26, 2011 1:06 PM EST reply actions  

If UK makes 7-10 FT's that equals seven points

if they they make 4-10 threes that equals 12 points (equating to a 100%+ FT %), plus, the made three often results in serious “mo mo.” which FT’s usually don’t.

by Ken Howlett on Jan 26, 2011 7:12 PM EST up reply actions  

I think he did the eFG% conversion wrong

and wasn’t taking a FT into account as only 1 point per make but instead used 2 points per make like a normal FG would be.

"Come test me every day if you want," says Pujols, "Everything I ever made in this game I would give back to the Cardinals if I got caught."

by StLHugo on Jan 27, 2011 10:31 AM EST up reply actions  

Cal talks about changing the offense?

His recent remarks sound like he would have liked to have played the Georgia game similar to South Carolina. Do we look for a more half court offense Saturday? A bit slower pace than the first Georgia game?

by UK1972 on Jan 26, 2011 1:43 PM EST reply actions  

Something else is bothering me.

Do you realize that we are only 1 banged knee away from playing Jarod Polson or Eloy Vargas a bunch of minutes. If you watched the South Carolina game, then I know you grimaced a little after both Doron Lamb and Brandon Knight grabbed their knee after falling to the ground in that game. Poor Brandon Knight was karate chopped in the throat, smacked in the mouth, and had his knee banged up. I don’t know if we can afford to play the entire season with such an aggressive offensive style. I do wish we would invest in some old school Patrick Ewing knee pads. It would make me feel better, even if we were the punchline on ESPN. http://www.everythingkentuckyonline.com

by Sam Henson on Jan 26, 2011 5:39 PM EST reply actions  

Sam

You sure don’t have much to say. Welcome aboard -jump in!

Happy Days are here again! Wildcat's have #1 recruiting class again!

by oldcat73 on Jan 26, 2011 6:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Welcome to A Sea of Blue, Sam

and yes, depth is certainly an issue with this team. It’s just something Cal and the players will have to deal with.

by Ken Howlett on Jan 26, 2011 7:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Stats

Obviously some guys love all this stat stuff. I long for the days of Tru when he analyzed the game, team chemistry, personal performances, etc.

Tired of this approach on SOB

by duganboy on Jan 26, 2011 8:34 PM EST reply actions  

dugan

Help us out. Not many posts for over 4 years membership!

Happy Days are here again! Wildcat's have #1 recruiting class again!

by oldcat73 on Jan 27, 2011 1:35 AM EST up reply actions  

Glenn still posts those kinds of things

The Postmortems in particular almost never have any stat analysis in them.

As for not liking the statistical approach, that’s perfectly fine but I encourage you to write a fanpost or two where you talk about the team the way you want to. It’ll get some attention. As an example, I direct you to this recent effort where TeamWeaver talked about the team composition after the Alabama loss.

I like statistical pieces, but I also love reading what other people see when they are watching the games.

3 > 2, except for very large values of 2.

by JLeverenz on Jan 27, 2011 3:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Just watching

the BYU/SDSU game and its a good one at the half.

Two observations:

1) I keep having flashbacks to the 60’s and early 70’s everytime they show Steve Fischer. Is it just me or does he remind you of John Wooden?

2) Jimmer Fredette is the smoothest shooter since Bird and Maravich. What an offensive talent. Doesn’t play a lick of defense.

I woke up feeling BLUE this morning. It's gonna be a great day.

by kywineman on Jan 26, 2011 11:04 PM EST reply actions  

Good insight

UL Football Fan/UK Basketball Fan ~ Okinawa, Japan

by The White Mandingo on Jan 26, 2011 11:22 PM EST reply actions  

If that's directed toward me, I appreciate it.

“Good insight” is not something normally directed my way :)

by Ken Howlett on Jan 27, 2011 3:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Ken

You have 20/20 insight!

Happy Days are here again! Wildcat's have #1 recruiting class again!

by oldcat73 on Jan 27, 2011 9:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

An exciting community-driven SBNation blog, by and for fans of the Kentucky Wildcats.

Community Guidelines
[UPDATED 01/18/2012]

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Eko_world_small
Coach Cal and His Love for Hair Flare
323_small
N.Y. Times/Pete Thamel / FLW Tour- Nerlens Noel Open
323_small
In Cal We Trust?
Small
Show 'Em The Money
323_small
Richie Farmer: Unforgettable Or Not?
Eko_world_small
Huge Problem for UK FANS
Img_0019_small
Not of general interest.
323_small
The King Is Dead, Long Live The King!
Grover_avatar_small
Reds Fans Upset UK to be Honored at Tonight's Game
Small
Recruiting In 1960's > Limit Was 25 Scholarships

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Twitter Widget -- Follow me!


Managing Editor

Tru_small Glenn Logan

Editor

Derby_024_small BigSkyCat

Fl_family_photo_small Ken Howlett

Author

Small JLeverenz

Justified-olyphant_small jc25

P1000195_small a2d2

Img_0019_small Alex Scutchfield