Kentucky Basketball: Will Experience Always Trump Talent?
John Stevens at Rush The Court has an essay today which analyzes the question of the success of "one and done" talent in the NCAA tournament. This has been a topic of much conversation (and a question I was asked on the Versus Network's The Daily Line program). The consensus of opinion is that "one and done" players cannot win a national championship in basketball.
Consider this from John's article:
It’s not that the list of one-year players isn’t strong; we’ve already mentioned Durant, Beasley, the UK players and can add OJ Mayo, Tyreke Evans, Eric Gordon and many others to the mix, but they generally haven’t been able to carry their teams through to the Four.
He's right about this. In the "one and done" era, teams that have had multiple freshmen who ultimately moved on to the NBA after their first year have yet to win a championship, with the exception of Syracuse. That's the exception that most people arguing the side against "one and dones" are forced to face -- Carmelo Anthony and the Syracuse Orange.
The fact of the matter is the 2002-03 Syracuse Orange looked somewhat like the 2009-10 Kentucky Wildcats. Syracuse started two freshmen, two sophomores and a senior, and UK started three freshmen, one sophomore (usually) and a junior.
The Orange that year were young coming off the bench, too, with two of their top three reserves sophomores or younger. That seems to match up nicely with UK's youth brigade off the bench this year, which like Syracuse had a couple of upperclassmen but saw most of the minutes go to younger players.
The tendency for those taking the argument that it is all but impossible for a team with a bunch of "one and dones" to win the national championship or even get to the Final Four rests on the theory that Anthony & Co. were outliers, and not an outcome that should be expected to be repeated. Because of the relative dearth of data available for the "one and done" era, it is hard to make a convincing statistical argument that this is so, but:
The available evidence suggests that Calipari is going to have to figure out a way to keep some of the nasty talent he’s recruiting on campus a little longer than one season so that the players can become familiar enough with each other to push on through to a Final Four and championship.
This makes sense, according to the evidence he's cited, which primarily includes the "one and done" era (Note that Anthony came before this rule was put in place). And as a practical matter, I would agree that if UK continues to lose five players a year to the NBA, it will be a problem for their national championship aspirations, primarily because with so little continuity from team to team, there is no "culture" developed that can be passed on.
There are several other things which make me dispute the position that Kentucky is going to have difficulty on the path it has chosen:
- This year was likely an outlier for UK. It will be rarely, perhaps even never again, when Kentucky sends its entire freshman class to the NBA. So some of that "nasty talent" will be hanging around campus for at least one more year, more times than not.
- The University of Michigan and their original Fab Five made it to the National Finals as freshmen, although they did not win that game. But this fact is another "outlier" that critics often forget about.
- Never in the history of college basketball have incoming freshmen been so well-prepared. This is particularly true of the "cream of the crop," because they play all summer long against top talent in the AAU.
I would also argue that neither Syracuse nor Michigan were outliers. Freshmen-led teams are in the minority when it comes to getting to the Final Four and beyond, but the biggest reason is that there have been so few of them with more than one freshman who was good enough to jump to the NBA. As far as I know, there has really only been one in the "one and done" era -- the 2007 Ohio St. Buckeyes, and they got to the National Finals. Even Syracuse only had Anthony jump to the pros, which makes their feat look even more improbable from the standpoint of the negative side of the argument.
When I was asked if I thought Kentucky could win with "one and dones" on The Daily Line, I answered "Yes," and rationalized that just because it has never been done does not mean it cannot be done. But both the question and the answer lacked a significant context, like "How many freshmen are we talking about? Two? Five?" That matters -- a lot.
In the end, we don't know how many of the new incoming class will wind up "one and done," but as of this moment (assuming Lamb actually does sign with Kentucky) I can see only two players who are likely to leave after one year -- Brandon Knight and Enes Kanter. So I think that John's suggestion will ultimately be fulfilled, as Kentucky will only have one departing senior next year to go with whoever winds up "one and done"
Kentucky can, and probably will, win the national championship with "one and dones." Of course, the critics will make excuses (and I'm not talking about John here, but others such as the crew of The Daily Line) when it happens, but it will happen. Just remember, you heard it here first.
198 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
So right
So many things have to go “right” for any team to win a championship. We have the SECOND most championships of ANY college in the land and we only have SEVEN. We can all think of great UK teams that should have put a run together, but for a myriad of reasons did not. 1977, 1984, 1997 come to mind. Tge reason championships are so special is because they are so rare for everyone.
by BluebloodinNaptown on Apr 17, 2010 7:57 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
great teams that never won
The 1997 Wildcats are a good point.
How many other teams full of future NBA talent never won a national title? You’d have to throw the Michigan fab 5 in there, and the 1999 Blue Devils come to mind as well.
1997 UK Team
Mercer, Anderson, Nazr, Magloire, Padgett, Turner made NBA from that team.
Sheppard (redshirt in 1997) also made NBA.
by FortyYearCatFan on Apr 17, 2010 6:52 PM EDT up reply actions
Wow, all that upperclassman leadership and no title.
I guess experience is not the end all and be all.
Experience?
Mercer was a soph. Nazr played a little as a soph. Magloire was a freshman.
Padgett was virtually a freshman in 1997, hardly played before that.
Turner was little-used, back-up PG the prior season.
by FortyYearCatFan on Apr 17, 2010 10:01 PM EDT up reply actions
That team could have won the NC
The Anderson injury just one of the pitfalls a team must overcome. Nothing to do with the talent or experience level. The 97 Cats just needed that second explosive scorer to win it all that they lost when Derek was injured. Shepard was a redshirt in 97.
"all the way"
you're right, tru
IF anybody can do it, Cal can. The fab 5 made it to the finals and had the game within reach until webber screws up. Because he was a fr? No, because he made a dumb mistake that anyone in the heat of action could make. We’ve all seen guys make buckets in the wrong end, call timeouts that they didnt have, throw the ball to the wrong team………etc. As forrest once said, ‘it happens’. The single biggest reason fr. dominated teams havent won very often, IMHO, is that a class of fr. with the necessary talent to win doesnt come together all that often. i.e. the fab 5 and out group this yr. There’s no real reason the fab 5 couldnt have won that game. And, there’s no reason our guys couldnt have won this yr. History will show that they DID. BUT, they COULD HAVE. I know its been said a thousand times, but they didnt lose because they were fr. They lost because the team as a whole went cold shooting one night. OK, so SOME boneheads will say we lost because we didnt have enough experience. B.S. Experience didnt help KU, SYR, OSU, MSU or any other ‘veteran’ team. In the tourney, you cant afford a bad game. Certainly not in the elite-8 and beyond. At the beginning of the tourney, which team would you have traded our team for? Does anyone really think that Puke was the BEST team? They by far had the easiest bracket and were lucky enough to catch WV on a bigtime hangover. Even Butler took them to the limit. No disrespect to Butler.
ON THE MONEY
This one and done stuff is nothing more than a bunch of jerks taking potshots at Cal. If you recall, JW was the only projected one and done from this year’s team. Patterson was a “given” and Cuz, Bledsoe and Orton would all need at least 2 years before they would be ready to go. So, there was a “method to his Madness” and it just panned out that all of these kids jelled at the right time. As Cuz said in his “farewell address” “all we needed was just 2 baskets” and Mazzula had the game of his life" and our season would have ended differently!
That's right, fox
Thats the price we paid for success. The guys played so well that even a sixth man looked like 1st round pick. Just makes everyone look better if you win. And some of those guys played better than we thought they would. I give Cal a lot of credit.
by bigbill992001 on Apr 17, 2010 7:43 PM EDT up reply actions
Wow
A lot of ‘if, ands, & buts’ there.
And yea, I think Duke was the best team. That’s why you play games and keep score.
'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'
by HozeKing on Apr 17, 2010 5:31 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Duke
I dont think that Duke being the best team is a given at all due to the format of the tournament. The one and done nature of the college tournament is what makes March so exciting and I wouldnt change it but you arent going to get the best team winning it all the time unless you switch to a playoff series.
DEEETROIT BASKETBALLL!!!
Sure.
And Kentucky really sucked in ’96, but just got lucky.
'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'
by HozeKing on Apr 17, 2010 11:23 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
In a one and done tourney, anything can happen and most years the agreed best team doesn't win.
That’s why NC State, Villanova and us in 98 are remembered. Duke wasn’t the best this year, they just happened to win six in a row when it counted and no one else did. The tourney is good at picking a national champion, not the best team.
Great argument there
You know im right on this one. It has nothing to do with either team. It’s the college system format. A one and done tourney makes it much easier for lesser teams to win. Doesnt mean the best teams wont win but it does make it much easier for lesser teams to win it.
DEEETROIT BASKETBALLL!!!
sorry
I meant history will show that they DIDNOT win. My mind works faster than my fingers.
by bigbill992001 on Apr 18, 2010 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions
We may win it.....we may not....but it is going to be fun to watch again!!!!
I AM THE CAT......The Cat In The Hat!!!
Disagree...Sort Of
I think what we saw this year in the NCAA were two teams making it to the finals without one and dones .Both were true “teams”. They had played together longer than just one year and they both played very smart. Don’t get me wrong. I loved this past season and the overwhelming talent UK had. And because of the drought of really good teams the past 4 or so years it was really fun to watch. I will also say that Cals Kids surprised me by doing as well as they did. I never expected them to win the numbers of games or get a number one seed in the tourney. But I always knew there would be a game somewhere a long the line that their youth and inexpierence,plus poor shooting,would cost them a game. Of course West Virginia came along and it happened. But they almost made it to the Final Four on sheer talent alone. And it could happen again,maybe next year. But I think to win with a team of one and dones,you have to catch the lightening in a bottle. The better way is to have really good talent who will stay. Players who will play pro ball but need the 3 to 4 years of seasoning at the college level. Plus I think you need that stability of knowing you have some leadership and experience coming back to mix with the incoming talent.
Agree with you.....anyone who saw Duke play during the season
as well as UK would have to say UK would win at least 7 out of 10 hypothetical games. Unfortunately that’s not how it works and in the NCAA you don’t get do overs. As the season progressed….I REALLY thought they’d win and with Kansas & Syracuse going down, it appeared we’d been handed a championship but that’s why they play the games.
You can't fix "stupid"!
Bull Sh-t!
I have be correctly accused of having a 'football fetish'. You know, someone who doesn't think football is the warm up sport to basketball season.
You have just proved what we all know....opinions are like A-holes and everyone
has one…..just some of us actually are A-holes.
You can't fix "stupid"!
Kentucky had their chance
to qualify for a game with Duke. We lost the game in the qualifer.
To say we would have beaten Duke or Butler seven out of ten times has not basis. Well, in a person who understands the game it wouldn’t.
I have be correctly accused of having a 'football fetish'. You know, someone who doesn't think football is the warm up sport to basketball season.
Good grief.
The state of Kentucky obviously needs more grief counselors. I see too many people still in the denial stage.
'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'
by HozeKing on Apr 17, 2010 5:35 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Denial?? Not sure where that's aimed. Is is denial
to feel your team shouldn’t have lost a game it did? If so…since I live in Louisville, graduated from UofL and have several UofL friends……same might apply to you guys about Michigan St.
You can't fix "stupid"!
JM
Has this guy been bared from Card blogs? He is all ways here gripping about our posts.
Happy Days are here again The sky is all ways BLUE again Happy days are here again !
lol....you know I wondered about that myself and I also wonder about
bobo…..don’t mind either but kinda wonder why they’re always on another team’s board.
btw….go read what i posted back to you about the NBA and the Suns the other day.
You can't fix "stupid"!
btw.....bobo or hoze......really have no problem with either of you
so please don’t take that as a knock and welcome any comments
You can't fix "stupid"!
JM
I forgot where we were atLOL
Happy Days are here again The sky is all ways BLUE again Happy days are here again !
He was 1 comment on the UofL blog
and 2000+ on here.
I don’t get it.
by mrmondaynite on Apr 17, 2010 8:07 PM EDT up reply actions
Just consider me a Man of Mystery
I get a kick out of this whenever it is brought up.
'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'
by HozeKing on Apr 17, 2010 9:05 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Hahaha!
I’m usually the one who brings it up.
by mrmondaynite on Apr 18, 2010 7:35 AM EDT up reply actions
Gripping??
The only things I tend to grip are golf clubs. In fact I got my irons re-gripped earlier this past week.
'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'
by HozeKing on Apr 17, 2010 9:10 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Come on, man.
Read the Community Guidelines. Don’t make this thread look like a KSR thread.
by mrmondaynite on Apr 18, 2010 7:36 AM EDT up reply actions
Hoze, this is a baiting comment.
Don’t do this.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Glenn Logan on Apr 18, 2010 12:56 PM EDT up reply actions
Duke actually plays in a league were basketball is king
as football is king in ours.
I have be correctly accused of having a 'football fetish'. You know, someone who doesn't think football is the warm up sport to basketball season.
no names going pro
A little off topic, but I think it’s crazy some of the kids that are declaring early for the draft. When I look at the list, half of them I’ve never even heard of. Cousins, Wall, and Bledsoe at least had constant media exposure and pretty much became house hold names. Does anyone know what the ratio is of players that declare for the draft, and the numbers that actually make it into the NBA?
2 Things
1. With all due respect, just because you haven’t heard of them does not mean they’re “no names,” or, stated differently, “no name” does not mean “no talent.” Do you know who Hassan Whiteside is? Many people don’t, and he’s widely predicted to be a lottery pick.
2. I’d say about 70% of the underclassmen who declare have declared without an agent. Most of the guys will be back in college next year. If you look at the lists of underclassmen who’ve declared on CNNSI, etc., most of these guys haven’t hired agents (and can pull their names out prior to 5/8), and will be back in school next year.
by mrmondaynite on Apr 17, 2010 9:11 AM EDT up reply actions
Also.....I'm not a big NBA fan but any game that you watch will have at least
4 guys playing that you’ve never heard of.
You can't fix "stupid"!
I only know of Whiteside
Because of a FanPost I did about our guys breaking a season block record and I saw where he had surpassed Varnado in blocks this year. (A Marshall 7’ freshman). Before that, I couldn’t have told you anything about him. Still that is all I know. :-)
Blue... there is no other color to Bleed !!!
Exactly!
I only know Whiteside because I see his name on all the mock draft sites.
by mrmondaynite on Apr 17, 2010 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions
He must be good, or he wouldn't be projected to high.
Please disregard Hasheem Thabeet’s D League stint for the moment. Hahah.
by mrmondaynite on Apr 17, 2010 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions
Anyone good enough to bring press to Marshall BBall must be special
I mean, we are talking about him instead of Jr VanHoose, Kenny Battle, Frank Lee, and a ton of other Marshall Players who had better stats.
"all the way"
Many of my friends who follow college basketball (mainly OSU fans)
would consider Orton a “no name,” but he’s projected as a first rounder.
by mrmondaynite on Apr 17, 2010 9:18 AM EDT up reply actions
Tru, it could happen. The one and done winning the Big Dance. Its happened once, I guess. But what’s the odds? How many times has it been played, you know the tournament? What’s the odds of a school of 2400 making it to the finals? What’s the odds of Cal recruiting another class like the last one?
If you really want to go out on a line, what’s the odds of Kentucky winning it all in the next five years? The current coach has never won it. He might but there’s other programs just as capable of winning it also. And most of them are not trying to gather lightening in a bottle to do it.
I have be correctly accused of having a 'football fetish'. You know, someone who doesn't think football is the warm up sport to basketball season.
Odds
1:64
65
1:2417 (oddly enough)
1:365
2:5.29031
I have kleptomania,
but when it gets bad,
I take something for it.
So which one of those odds do you want to bet the ranch on?
I have be correctly accused of having a 'football fetish'. You know, someone who doesn't think football is the warm up sport to basketball season.
Looking at the entire history of the tournament is not the way to analyze this question.
Remember, that freshmen weren’t even eligible to play until, what, the 1970’s. The whole “one and done” era began when the NBA changed put their new rule into place requiring incoming players to basically be one year removed from high school (yeah, yeah, I know it is not exactly like that but it is close enough). That rule only came about in 2006. We have only had three college basketball seasons with the rule in place and many of the “one and dones” were on teams that did not have the supportive talent to get all the way there. I agree with Tru on this, it will not be long before another champion has a one and done.
by wklawdog on Apr 17, 2010 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I don't know what the odds are.
I just know that it has happened, and will happen again.
The reality is that the ideal team has a combination of talent and experience. In today’s college game, talent and experience are always fighting for mutual exclusivity – the greater your talent, the less your experience is likely to be.
What Calipari needs to do to raise his chances are to keep enough talented experience around to compliment the great talent he will be bringing in, but not keeping.
That seems doable to me.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Who Could Have Predicted
that Orton & Bledsoe would declare for the NBA. I don’t think they were on anyone’s radar at the beginning of the season. Perhaps it was Cal’s coaching that got them to that level. If that is the case we might have more “one & dones” than anyone is able to predict each & every year. Kind of a two-edged sword if you know what I mean.
Orton and Bledsoe declaring for the NBA ... their stock rose by playing with Wall/Cousins
Brandon Knight having the same affect … or so it seems
Based on their performance
I would say the NBA must be desperate if they consider those guys ready to play against grown men who are polished pros.
"all the way"
Great Observations, Tru
Especially # 3.
The top high school kids are ready to play as freshmen in college. Most have more playing experience than college juniors would have had a few years ago.
Looking over some of the mock drafts, few of the top 20 or 30 are seniors; half or more are freshmen and sophomores. Obviously, the NBA thinks these 19 and 20 year olds are ready to contribute.
If we are successful in recruiting the best high school players year after year, few of them are likely to be around for four years. But those who aren’t NBA-ready may provide just enough leadership and continuity to get us over the hump.
At any rate, I’m not going to advocate the recruitment of second-rate players. Seems like we’ve tried that already.
UK's Last 3 Champions
The 1978 team was loaded with experience.
Likewise 1996 team. So was 1998 team.
At UK (at least) experienced talent wins.
by FortyYearCatFan on Apr 17, 2010 11:38 AM EDT reply actions
I think
the 96 team is a very good example………I felt very comfortable knowing we were going to win it all that year. They had the talent and experience to dominate. WIth an inexpereinced team you are just hoping that they don’t run down mentally in a game.
Inexperienced Talent OTOH
1980 Cats (29-6, Sweet 16) were dominated by freshman talent.
1985 Cats (18-13, Sweet 16) also had lots of freshman talent.
1993 Cats (30-4, Final 4) had gobs of frosh talent as well.
Ditto 2005 Cats (28-6, Elite 8) with plenty of frosh talent.
And (of course) 2010 Cats at 35-3 and Elite 8.
Close but not quite.
by FortyYearCatFan on Apr 17, 2010 11:41 AM EDT reply actions
4th Year Junior
Ford was senior in 1994.
by FortyYearCatFan on Apr 17, 2010 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm not so enamored with the concept
that winning a national championship is the ulitmate measure of success in college basketball. Yes of course it would be a tremendous accomplishment. However, if these Cats proved anything to me it was that the personal (vicarious) connection with each member this team and the pure adrenalin rush they gave me were more than worth the price of the ticket. I was dejected for several days after the WVU loss, but came to realize that what I had witnessed from November thru March was not only memorable but, was as special as any connection with any UK team ever.
Knight Did Not Sign LOI
Just a financial aid agreement:
http://www.kentucky.com/2010/04/17/v-mobile/1227772/knights-signature-not-set-in-stone.html
"Perhaps the fact that we have seen millions voting themselves into complete dependence on a tyrant has made our generation understand that to choose one's government is not necessarily to secure freedom" - Hayek
by Wild Weasel on Apr 17, 2010 12:54 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
It would be foolish for Knight to sign an LOI...
The only kid who should sign an LOI is one who wants to play for a specific school, no matter who the coach is. An LOI give no protection whatsoever for the athlete..it only protects the university.
after reading that in the CJ this morning....can't really see why any
parent would let their kid sign a LOI even if they KNEW they wanted to go to a particular school……coaches get fired or the school gets put on probation??? I think he’s making smart move there.
You can't fix "stupid"!
right, jm
Anyway, its not like BK is going to transfer to another school, hes probably one and done.
by bigbill992001 on Apr 17, 2010 7:53 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm glad to see this.
There is not logical reason for a kid like Knight to ever sign an LOI.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
yeah
and I think we’ll probably see more of this in the future, tru
by bigbill992001 on Apr 18, 2010 10:40 AM EDT up reply actions
I just don't see
us winning a national championship with one and dones(meaning more then two one and dones). But this is a new era of basketball so I am basing that on what I have seen the last thirty years. I do think that sophomores can carry us through………its not just about freshman though……..the one thing I mentioned at the end of last season was the tourney and for everyone not to get their hopes up. Because NO ONE had sweet sixteen experience……PPat hasn’t had any experience. We all need to understand that its not about the ability to play anyone……….its the mental aspect of experience. No doubt that we had the most talent of any team in the nation…….but its hard to explain to kids the mental aspect of playing lights out every single tourney game because well they have never played on this big of stage.
30 years ago, freshmen weren't even allowed to play, right?
Going 30 years back isn’t a good frame of reference. I think I would argue that of all sports in America – amateur and professional – none has changed more than Division 1 college basketball. The “one-and-done” phenomena came into being when the NBA changed its rules (must go to college, no straight out of high school, blah blah blah), and that was fairly recently. Thus, I think you can only look at the last 10 years or so as a frame of reference,
Looking at those 10 years, here is what we know: 1 “one-and-done” team has won a championship. So it’s possible.
by mrmondaynite on Apr 17, 2010 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions
Actually, the "one and done" rule came into being in 2006. Looking at the past 3 seasons is the more appropiate standard.
There you go.
I stand corrected.
The past 3 years suggest that “one-and-done” teams get close, but don’t win.
Curses.
by mrmondaynite on Apr 17, 2010 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions
Doesn't change the fact
that a championship was won with a one and done.
I woke up feeling BLUE this morning. It's gonna be a great day.
Not within the last 3 years.
WKLaw and I were looking at the last 3 years…or the time since the “one and done” rule was born.
by mrmondaynite on Apr 17, 2010 8:04 PM EDT up reply actions
I think Cal's one and dones eventually will...
I’m just saying it hasn’t been done since the rule was instituted.
by mrmondaynite on Apr 17, 2010 8:05 PM EDT up reply actions
Good grief
I meant I have watched basketbal for thirty years……….the more experienced teams/talented teams tend to win more championships. I think sometimes we are trying to cut off our nose in spite of our faces.
One & Done Started In 1960's
The ABA started 1 & Done more than 40 years ago.
Even UK had 1 & Done (Tom Payne) in 1971.
by FortyYearCatFan on Apr 17, 2010 10:18 PM EDT up reply actions
"One and done" rule I and WKLaw are referring to
is the requirement (from 2006) that you must attend 1 year of college. No one can go pro straight from high school.
by mrmondaynite on Apr 18, 2010 7:33 AM EDT up reply actions
So the past 3-4 years is the proper frame of reference.
by mrmondaynite on Apr 18, 2010 7:34 AM EDT up reply actions
UK Had First Ever 1 & Done (And First To NBA Also)
LeRoy Edwards played 1 year of varsity in 1935 then left for pro ball.
NBA “hardship” draft started in 1971. Tom Payne of UK was second player chosen. Payne played 1 year of varsity at UK.
The first player chosen (Nate Williams of Utah St) played 2 years on Aggies’ varsity.
by FortyYearCatFan on Apr 18, 2010 10:28 AM EDT up reply actions
Regardless Of That
Players have been leaving after 1 year of college since the 1960’s.
College basketball has thrived since the 1960’s.
by FortyYearCatFan on Apr 18, 2010 10:03 AM EDT up reply actions
Yes, we understand.
That’s not what we’re talking about. Since the rule was instituted in 2006, no team comprised of one-and-dones has won a Championship. The only frame of reference that should be used here is the years/champions since the rule was instituted (2006).
by mrmondaynite on Apr 18, 2010 12:12 PM EDT up reply actions
I understand that one and dones are not a new phenomenon.
However, the rule requiring the one year of college is only 4 years old.
by mrmondaynite on Apr 18, 2010 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions
OK
let me see if I can make this simpler………I said I have watched 30 years of basketball and it always seemed to me that the teams that had the experienced upperclassmen were the ones that won the championships. I said I could be wrong about the next thirty because basketball is changing……….whether you had freshman or sophomores playing for the first time………..experience does matter. You are trying to argue with something that wasn’t even the point of the post!!!!!!!
If you want to argue then argue about the merit of me saying that it takes mental experience to win a championship!!!!
Duke, Butler, West Virginia, Mich St
All were experienced AND talented.
All made Final 4.
by FortyYearCatFan on Apr 18, 2010 10:25 AM EDT up reply actions
The one thing lacking on this team ......
was the experienced player who could come in off the bench and hit shots, especially the three. No Cameron Mills, or Heshimu Evans, or Ravi Moss ……
Freshmen Have Played Since 1973
UK freshmen are a prime reason why the 1975 team excelled.
by FortyYearCatFan on Apr 17, 2010 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions
Well there have been several good points made on both sides but obviously
most of us only care about UK. Looking at the WV game……who would have predicted we’d shoot the way we did and WV would shoot the way they did? I was more worried about Cornell and I’d watched WV play several games.
The point is that almost every team will have a clunker in the 6 game NCAA on the way to a championship. Sometimes MUCH better teams loose….it’s just the nature of the NCAA and we can point to our friends at Kansas & Syracuse this year who didn’t have nearly as many one & done’s but went down in flames before we did…….and were both predicted to go further. I just think there are too many factors to say the one & done kids are going to be the reason a team didn’t win a championship.
You can't fix "stupid"!
Without the one and dones
I doubt we would have reached the elite 8 with a 35 and 3 record.
I woke up feeling BLUE this morning. It's gonna be a great day.
not sure if that was meant for me or not. Agree with you totally....
was just trying to say that having several one & done’s “doesn’t” mean you can’t win a championship…..in my opinion.
You can't fix "stupid"!
yep
and I wonder what’a going on at the sites for KU, SYR, OSU. They’re wringing their hands, trying to analyze what went wrong…………lol. They’re saying ‘man, if we had just made another play or 2’. Hey. its a game. We lost, they lost. It happens.
by bigbill992001 on Apr 17, 2010 8:02 PM EDT up reply actions
ARRGGGH!
Guys, those of us who are saying experience matters are not saying that we lost on lack of experience alone!!!!!!!!!!!!! We are simply saying if all had stayed one more year……..no one could have beaten us!!! They would have felt the taste and hunger of defeat………they would have been less rattled when the threes start falling…….because they had already been through it. Goodness gracious I have never seen such frustrating view points.
You guys have to understand that I don’t want Calipari to change his approach to recruiting…….I just don’t want to reload every year….seven or eight players. Sounds like that won’t happen again so I am fine. But yall are so quick to jump to the defense of Calipari’s recruiting that you are not looking at what the facts are in this case. I am proud for all you to be defending the coach but this isn’t an attack on him or our guys that just played :)
ten
I’m not defending nor attacking Cal at this point. I wont base my overall opinion of the guy or his methods based on last yr. Last yr was so weird in a lot of ways. I really dont see us having to reload EVERY yr. But, the fact is, with the NBA’s 1 yr rule, if we’re successful more kids will opt to go early. I see it as the price of success because we make some of these kids look a little better than they really are……………i.e. Bledsoe and Ort. Lets hope that some of these kids stick around a while. My head spins when I think about the old days and having a group like last yr for 3 or 4 yrs. OMG! Really, now, would you not like Cal to take Knight and Kanter?
by bigbill992001 on Apr 18, 2010 10:52 AM EDT up reply actions
some call the way we shot 'defense'
I have be correctly accused of having a 'football fetish'. You know, someone who doesn't think football is the warm up sport to basketball season.
Go Sopht
Keeping quality talent around two seasons will suffice in getting championships. they hone their skills in front of killer crowds (not many NBA stadiums as loud as simplest college ones) and get most of schooling completed. three offseasons in NBA would finish their degree requirments (maybe quicker). These guys would be the explosive 2nd year types. Much like we thought of D Cuz before he blew up.
Project studs will stay 3-4 and develop against other NBA picks and keeping stability of program. bench of 6-8 proj studs and mixture of 3 or 4 super soph with 1 or 2 WonNDon sprinkled in.
there’s ur recipe. now get cookin!
I have kleptomania,
but when it gets bad,
I take something for it.
Wroten Next 2011 Domino?
Tony Wroten, Jr. (coming off FB knee injury) now has UK as leader following Gilchrist commit. Line ’em up, knock ’em over.
"Perhaps the fact that we have seen millions voting themselves into complete dependence on a tyrant has made our generation understand that to choose one's government is not necessarily to secure freedom" - Hayek
Wonder Why Calipari Stopped Recruiting Selby?
Last Friday evening, Josh Selby, the nation’s most explosive high school guard yet to commit to a college, walked out the back door of Lake Clifton High School here with the Tennessee assistant Steve Forbes. The two kept chatting as they approached a light-blue Mercedes-Benz with tinted windows. Selby, keys in hand, popped the trunk, threw sneakers in it and joked with Forbes. Selby said goodbye, and drove away. It was Selby’s last visit from a coach before making his college decision.Emphasis mine
"Perhaps the fact that we have seen millions voting themselves into complete dependence on a tyrant has made our generation understand that to choose one's government is not necessarily to secure freedom" - Hayek
Keith Bogans Had An Escalade In Early 2000's
I don’t think he got it from UK.
by FortyYearCatFan on Apr 17, 2010 3:33 PM EDT up reply actions
Rondo was rolling in a nice car leant to him by Derek Anderson when he was here
The Mercedes belongs to a former coach of his who lets him drive it. This kind of stuff happens all the time and it happens here at UK too.
DEEETROIT BASKETBALLL!!!
A Tennessee recruiting scandal would brighten my morning
Please, please be nefarious. . .
I'm officially declaring myself eligible for the 2010 NBA draft.
is it legal?
Lets say that someone gives a coach or a TRUSTED FRIEND of a top recruit a car, or a house for that matter, and lets say that that coach or friend then allows the kid to drive the car and/or live in the house. Is it legal?
by bigbill992001 on Apr 17, 2010 8:09 PM EDT up reply actions
Layers of exceptions
Anyone associated with a school, from being a blogger supporting a school, to a businessman who donates $ to the school, to an alumni; All are considered boosters, and are therefore not allowed to give, donate, etc, anything to a current player or recruit, or a player or recruits family.
by Ken Howlett on Apr 18, 2010 12:40 AM EDT up reply actions
ok
so, by THAT reasoning, then his HS coach could let him ‘use’ a mercedes as long as the coach didnt have a connection to the school the kid might go to?
by bigbill992001 on Apr 18, 2010 12:45 AM EDT up reply actions
Yes, my understanding of the rules, yes.
by Ken Howlett on Apr 18, 2010 12:47 AM EDT up reply actions
Correct
UK players in the 1970’s were morely to be “gifted” new cars by UK “friends” if you will.
by FortyYearCatFan on Apr 18, 2010 10:05 AM EDT up reply actions
Not getting Selby
would at least put a stop to that “Selby decommitted from Tennessee after WWW talked to him” theory.
It is not worth an intelligent man’s time to be in the majority. By definition, there are already enough people to do that.
by kentuckygirl0724 on Apr 17, 2010 4:32 PM EDT up reply actions
Same article:
There has been at least one teacher who helped Selby through his development. His name is Scottie Bowden and he was a principal at Golden Ring Middle School when Selby was a student. He then coached him with the Baltimore Select team, which he helped found in 1992.
Bowden has remained a supporter, offering advice and sometimes allowing Selby to drive his Mercedes-Benz.
"He told me he’s going to get me a Benz when he makes the N.B.A.," said Bowden, who is now a coach with Anthony’s team, Team Melo. "I told him that’s not what this is about. I’m not in this for gain. I’m in it to see him succeed."
"It breaks your heart. It is designed to break your heart. The game begins in the spring, when everything else begins again, and it blossoms in the summer, filling the afternoons and evenings, and then as soon as the chill rains come, it stops and leaves you to face the fall alone." A. Bartlett Giamatti
She couldn't stay away!
Happy Days are here again The sky is all ways BLUE again Happy days are here again !
sounds like
selby gets ‘paid’ now and will ‘repay’ after he signs a contract, huh?
by bigbill992001 on Apr 18, 2010 12:46 AM EDT up reply actions
Did Jerry Tipton
write this story?
I woke up feeling BLUE this morning. It's gonna be a great day.
Probably?
What exactly does that mean? There is a greater chance they will win one than not? Win one within three years? Five years? Ten years? Cal has already admitted he will ‘only’ be at UK for only a few years and given his history, you may not want to count on that. ‘Probably’ seems a little vague.
'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'
by HozeKing on Apr 17, 2010 5:25 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
dude with all due respect......how can ANY UofL fan knock another
team’s coach at the moment? I’m not even going to bother listing all the reasons why that seems wrong.
You can't fix "stupid"!
Dude?
I haven’t been referred to as a dude since one of my son’s junior high school friends mistakenly did that a few years ago. But hey, it’s really cool and groovy. I am digging it. Awesome.
'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'
by HozeKing on Apr 17, 2010 9:15 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
well it's because we have so much in common!!'-)
I graduated from UofL in 80 after going at night for 3+ years after full time for 2. My wife’s from Edgewood. I played softball for years with Chuck Shupp and Steve Crum and other guys who’d played baseball for UofL or were connected somehow. I was born and bred a UK fan but was going to “try” to like both when I started but just couldn’t buy into Denny’s laid back west coast style. Anyway…..just teasing!!
You can't fix "stupid"!
Right........
Pitino brings a whole new meaning to the phrase “under the table gifts.” LOL
how many Final Fours has Pitino had vacanted?
I have be correctly accused of having a 'football fetish'. You know, someone who doesn't think football is the warm up sport to basketball season.
CONTRARIAN......
somebody disposed to taking opposite position…….a habitual opponent of accepted policies, opinions, or practices…..a thoroughgoing contrarian, accepting nothing anyone says………see——-PARIS
You can't fix "stupid"!
Paris ...
… this is a baiting comment. Desist with it. It is irrelevant and designed to make people mad.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Glenn Logan on Apr 18, 2010 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions
What about the cheap shot at Pitino?
Sorry you see it that way.
I know it doesn’t fall in lock step with the sainthood we are trying to annoint Cal with but I DO believe he is ahead of Pitino two – zip on vacanies.
Are we not going to acknowledge the 1996 Championship of this skirt chasing, program leaving, individual or was he in Sanitsville at the time of that victory?
I have be correctly accused of having a 'football fetish'. You know, someone who doesn't think football is the warm up sport to basketball season.
Hozer - Wrong again
It must be tough going through life always being wrong.
Cal has stated that he can’t see himself coaching after his 60th BDay. He’s currently 50, or he may have just turned 51. He’s never, ever said anything resembling what you stated above.
You write about his history, well lets look at that — He was at UMass for what, 10-11 years, and Memphis 8 or 9. So no, he doesn’t hop from job to job.
by Ken Howlett on Apr 18, 2010 12:45 AM EDT up reply actions
right, again, ken
Anyway, he’s a COACH! Does any coach stay at one school his entire career? JEEZ!
by bigbill992001 on Apr 18, 2010 12:49 AM EDT up reply actions
Really. How so?
{…sniff…snif…} What’s that? Oh, the stinking air of superiority.
You are making my point. Nine years is relatively a short period of time. It only allows for two full cycles of seniors….if that’s imprortant to you. I think ‘probably’ is too high of an expectation for a coach to win in nine years, especially for someone that has never won one and where the most recent year’s #1 seed fell far short of expectation.
Oh, and you missed Cal’s time as the New Jersey Net’s coach. Sorry to disappoint someone who is right all the time.
'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'
I think the air of superiority smells pretty good.
My sniffer must be off.
He did not make your point for you, Hoze. Very few coaches stay in jobs more than ten years.
And he didn’t leave the NJ Nets job. He was … uh … freed up for other opportunities by team management.
This is an debate you lose. Now, if you had been talking about Larry Brown …
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Sorry, you must have gotten distracted.
Your missing my point. I’ll humbly accept responsibility by not making myself clear.
My main point was not arguing that Cal is a ‘job hopper’. I don’t think it is fair, nor accurate to expect that Cal will win a national championship as UK coach. Can he…sure. Is it more likely than not…that’s where I disagree. Certainly if he was a Matt Painter type and could possibly be at UK for twenty years, the probability goes up. Look at it this way….I am giving Cal a break.
I guess it’s okay for people to part and parsel my words and investigate something to pick out from the main point. I’ll take that as a compliment.
'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'
Hoze ...
… I am ignoring your last sentence, but your protests about being picked on are laughable. This is a UK fan site, not a discussion of the National Archives, and you are constantly taking controversial positions purely for the sake of stirring up argument. Deal with it.
To your point – It is both fair and accurate to expect Calipari to win national championships at UK. That’s what he was hired to do, just like Pitino was at Louisville or Bill Self at Kansas. Any suggestion otherwise is frankly just nonsense, and your sophistic argument is both specious and intended to provoke.
Get a handle on this, Hoze, it is getting very annoying.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Couple of points:
1. It’s up to you to decide to ignore my points or not, but don’t write that you will & then go ahead and criticize.
2. Please, I do not think it is fair of ANY coach to expect him to win a championship within a certain time frame. Period.
Get a handle on what? I need to agree with every point you make? Holy Cow….as we are fond of saying in Chicago.
'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'
by HozeKing on Apr 18, 2010 6:57 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I respect your priveledge to mske your points
If they are winners; no vitriol needed,right? Maybe your attitude of bringing a gun to the fight means you are looking for debate? Fine, make it about points backed up with stats or facts and we will go as deep as you want to go. No one here is getting paid; so there is no reason to get excited. If you have a valid point I will be the first to agree, however personal attacks and baiting have diminished the perception of otherwise thought provoking posts.
"all the way"
For your information and consideration:
1. In the last 13 years, Cal has had 5 jobs with 5 differerent organizations or schools.
2. Cal use to be an asistant coach for Larry Brown.
Just sayin’.
'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'
That air of superiority is currently over the State of North Carolina!
I have be correctly accused of having a 'football fetish'. You know, someone who doesn't think football is the warm up sport to basketball season.
These kids are playing some serious "in the clouds" basketball
I AM THE CAT......The Cat In The Hat!!!
Experience
If you look at the results in the piece you’ll notice that over the last 4 years the team that had the highest average experience in its starting rotation among the Final Four teams went on to win the championship.
Now that doesn’t mean that experience is the reason those teams won, but it’s worth noting that by the time you get to the Final Four, EVERY team is talented and you just aren’t going to get the discrepancies in ability that you see in the first 3 rounds. At that point, the teams whose talent is concentrated in their most experienced players would seem to have the advantage over the teams whose talent is concentrated in their younger guys.
I’d be interested to know what that experience comparison looks like for the last 15 years or so and whether the trend continues even before the current NBA rule.
3 > 2, except for very large values of 2.
Lamb Decision Time
It is UK!
"Perhaps the fact that we have seen millions voting themselves into complete dependence on a tyrant has made our generation understand that to choose one's government is not necessarily to secure freedom" - Hayek
by Wild Weasel on Apr 17, 2010 9:38 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
Winning a title
with one and dones (let’s say you have to have at least two to be considered a OAD team) will eventually happen. Whats missing in the discussion is the positions played by the OADs. I think Cal is probably going the toughest route with his main OAD being the point guard. It would likely be easier if they were perhaps any combination not involving the point guard.
Following that argument would lead me to believe next year may still be within reach since BK’s ball handling at this point is on par with Wall’s this time last year. Although BK doesn’t bring some of the inside scoring that Wall offers from being the talented freak that he is, the pure point talents of BK could bode well.
I see we just got Lamb so a balanced backcourt will be put on the floor again! Yessssssssssssss…..
It has already happened and not just with Carmelo Anthony.
Marvin Williams of UNC also did it. Plus, you can look back at many teams from the past that either won a title with one or two freshman playing key rolls that could have gone pro after their first year if times were the same. Pervis Ellison, Grant Hill, Patrick Ewing, Charlie Villaneuva, etc, and those are off the top of my head.
Pope To Wake
Mark Pope moves up the assistant ladder, head recruiter for Jeff Bzdelick at Wake Forest.
"Perhaps the fact that we have seen millions voting themselves into complete dependence on a tyrant has made our generation understand that to choose one's government is not necessarily to secure freedom" - Hayek
by Wild Weasel on Apr 17, 2010 10:04 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
Since we all know that
getting through 6 games in the tournament requires at least a few breaks along the way, this whole argument against “a bunch of one and doners” comes down to very basic statistics in terms of opportunity.
How many teams comprised of “a bunch of one and doners” have there even been? How many teams that were not “a bunch of one and doners” have there been? What is that ratio?
I could just as easily make a statement that a team comprised of “a bunch of guys with first names that have 3 syllables and last names that end in the letter ‘s’”, will never win a championship.
One-and-doners have just as much chance as anyone else. The team we just watched was in a great position to do so, if they could have found the shooting range in the dome.
-- Tim . http://HomeSalesLexington.com/barn
very good points, Lex
I love the analogy about the team comprised of guys with 3 syllable names.
by blue kentucky girl on Apr 18, 2010 10:53 AM EDT up reply actions
After the Cats won it all in 1978.......
all the talk was of Duke and how they would be a Final Four fixture with their great freshmen lead by Banks and Gminski … never made it back, despite the experience factor.
Same Timeframe (Post 1978)
No team had more talent than UK in 1979-80-81-82-83.
But UK did not make it back to FF then, either.
by FortyYearCatFan on Apr 18, 2010 10:07 AM EDT up reply actions
1979 was a lean year.........
about all the Cats had coming back were guards after losing Robey, Lee, Phillips, and Givens. The “bigs” were not all that big. Cowen and Verderber were not exactly elite talents. Then Anderson got undercut by LSU in the SEC tourney and the Cats lost in overtime to UT playing pretty much 4 guards. They had a core of good players, but Bowie was the only real All American type top talent during that stretch. The Cats only had two top ten teams during that stretch.
1979
UK returned guards Macy, Shidler, Casey, and Claytor.
Big men were Chuck Aleksinas and Fred Cowan plus Lavon Williams.
Recruits were HS A-A Dwight Anderson, Clarence Tillman, and Chuck Verderber.
Total of (6) HS A-A on the 79 roster.
by FortyYearCatFan on Apr 18, 2010 5:24 PM EDT up reply actions
Total Of (9) HS A-A Recruits in 1978-79-80
Anderson, Tillman, Verderber in 78.
Bowe, Minniefield, Hord, Hurt in 79.
Bearup and Master in 80.
All 9 were Top 25 rated (or better).
by FortyYearCatFan on Apr 18, 2010 5:26 PM EDT up reply actions
How many of those ......
were All Conference and more than NBA journeymen? Highly rated in high school doesn’t always translate to college. Aleksinas, Tillman, and Anderson didn’t stay for 4 years between them.
All Were Talented
Plenty enough to W at NCAA level.
by FortyYearCatFan on Apr 19, 2010 7:27 AM EDT up reply actions
let's hear your decision on who makes a winner.
What’s the conclusion of all this jabber?
I vote for experience.
And you?
I have be correctly accused of having a 'football fetish'. You know, someone who doesn't think football is the warm up sport to basketball season.
Do you vote for experience over talent?
Is that what you’re saying? I didn’t think so.
It takes both, of course.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Yep I vote experience
as has been shown in the past.
Didn’t you ask if experience will always win over talent?
Of course not. Always is a long time. Means every single time.
Sorta like anyone who questions the perfectmess of anything associated with Kentucky basketball is always in the wrong.
Isn’t that the way it is?
I have be correctly accused of having a 'football fetish'. You know, someone who doesn't think football is the warm up sport to basketball season.
Without talent ....
… experience won’t help.
There has to be both.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Let me explain
If your arrticle was about teams without talent at all, then I understand. You know the Gardner Webbss. The VMis and such.
I thought we were saying a team such as Duke, West Virginia, and the such. Teams that are assembied by coaches who are looking to build prorgams and not be a flash in the pan every once in a while. But Cal won big at Memphis? Little different conference don’t you think.
I think he’ll do fine at Lexington. We’ll win Other teams will win a few. As far as winning a national championship. He hasn’t yet but of course he hasn’t been at Kentucky. The problem is other schools like the North Carolina , Michigan State. Kansas, Duke and others aren’t going to be imtimidated by the fact Cal is at Kentucky.
Still would I feel better with an average Kentucky team with talent than one with four or five freshmen that are simply stopping by to get that year out of the way before they go to the NBA.
I have be correctly accused of having a 'football fetish'. You know, someone who doesn't think football is the warm up sport to basketball season.
Paris, get a handle on it.
Not sure what that means, but I just wanted to share the sentiment.
'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'
by HozeKing on Apr 18, 2010 7:07 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I guess a 'thank you' is my response.
Of course I could have questioned your loyality, nationally, and manhood as I have had my questioned but I’ll leave that to others.
I have be correctly accused of having a 'football fetish'. You know, someone who doesn't think football is the warm up sport to basketball season.
Yep
Experienced talent wins almsot every year.
by FortyYearCatFan on Apr 18, 2010 5:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Experienced talent ...
… wins over inexperienced talent.
You can’t do it without both.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
You also need to include .....
the luck of the draw, injuries, and just plain luck or unlikely events. You have teams holding power houses to 3 field goals in one half, then losing a championship when a lesser talented team only misses one shot in a half. Or an airball turning into the winning put back. Or a star player being set up to run over a player as he turns to head up court and fouls out. Fouls being called or not called. How does a team no one wanted beat Shaq, Stanley Roberts, and Chris Jackson…. all NBA first rounders? Anything can happen once that round ball goes up into the air.
Yea but you didn’t apply yourself during your fprmative years so who knows how great you could hve been? lol And I doubt you fully have grasped the fact we didn’t win the tournament with what was considered the pest freshman class ever assembled. At least that’s what I read here.
I have be correctly accused of having a 'football fetish'. You know, someone who doesn't think football is the warm up sport to basketball season.
One team will win it all.....
not always the team with the best talent. As I said, anything can happen once the game starts.
Two teams
come to mind when I think of the most talented /experienced that was the clear season/tourney favorite in the last 15 years……..Kentucky 96 and North Carolina 09.
That is not good percentage of the best teams that should have one it. Kansas should have won it this year.
Actually the overall #1 going into the tournament was UMass.......
who had beaten UK in the beginning of the season. The Cats started off #1 but dropped after their first loss, then regained it later and dropped again after the loss to MSU in the SEC tourney.
Paris
I don’t really know what your purpose is on this board. I understand from your football posts that you don’t like anything about our football program. Now it seems that you feel the same about Cal and his program. If that is the case why don’t you look for someone you approve of? I don’t think your negative posts about almost everything adds much to the board:-)
Happy Days are here again The sky is all ways BLUE again Happy days are here again !
Think
What have I said that isn’t true?
I’m not here for the pep rally. When someone does something good I praise them as much as anyone. I din’t go after players, former coaches, especially those that have a personal problem and I am not among those who hate anyone that is more successful than the Cats. i.e. Coach K, Duke basketball, Bobby Knight, and others. I saw not joy in Stansbury getting fined as many of you did.
I’m want a winner as much as any of you. The ways and means to getting there is debatebale.
Don’t question my loyality, interests and comments because I’m not beating a drum about how great we are all the time.
That’s for those who don’t want to consider we can get better and all will be perfect in the future. Not my style.
I have be correctly accused of having a 'football fetish'. You know, someone who doesn't think football is the warm up sport to basketball season.
Paris
“Still would I feel better with an average Kentucky team with talent than one with four or five freshmen that are simply stopping by to get that year out of the way before they go to the NBA” Example! Just stirring the pot.
Happy Days are here again The sky is all ways BLUE again Happy days are here again !
by oldcat70 on Apr 18, 2010 7:38 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Wihout a mix of explosive talent and steady players
No one will win the NC. When these early exits dilute the talent base as they have; the teams with third and fourth year players who learned the scheme and inproved every year will bring home the bacon. With all the talent we are bringing in, we will have almost no bench for 2010-11.
"all the way"
how do you figure that??
The bench looks like it will be almost identical to last year, unless Liggins and Miller really step up and force some of these freshment to ride pine for a year….Only real change is Orton, and that is not set in stone yet……
I AM THE CAT......The Cat In The Hat!!!
I'm asking you!
With 5 guys leaving early, and three graduating, that makes 5 guys;Darius Miller, Darnell Dodson, who may transfer, John Hood,De Andre Liggins, and Josh Harrelson. Only 3 of the guys Cal signed Graduate HS this year, which leaves at 8 players. What do you have? Even if we add 2 more, if they are not PF or C’s , the depthy does not help us. As it stands today, UK has no depth at the 4/5 spot.
"all the way"
ohhhhh.....sorry....misunderstood.....
I think we will know more by the end of the week…..and I honestly think we will get one guy back from the draft, and I think it’s gonna be Orton…..I could be wrong……but a frontline of Orton and Kanter with Harrellson backing them up looks pretty good…..assuming we get one more freshman or transfer that is 6’9" or better….Harrellson has got to get his butt in shape and be ready to run the floor though….and I do mean RUN!…..He needs to take a lesson from Cuz’ program from last year….get in shape and play hellacious D…..
I AM THE CAT......The Cat In The Hat!!!

by 














