Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Diego Sanchez and the Dangers of Fame in MMA

UK Basketball: A Wrinkle in Time?  Maybe

Before we get started, I have to congratulate former Kentucky basketball star Travis Ford on his team's huge home win Saturday.  As most know, Ford's Oklahoma State Cowboys pummeled like they meant it, the No. 1 ranked Kansas Jayhawks.  James "He's Really Good" Anderson and former UK player Matt Pilgrim combined for 45 points, as the 'Boys took it straight to the 'hawks ... and actually, it was a game which played-out very similarly to UK's loss in Knoxville.

At the end of the day, though, Ford gave me reason to smile.

While Okie State's reality was a big win over the top ranked team in the country, the Big Blue reality is -- When a team executes as poorly as UK did Saturday, and misses as many shots as they did Saturday, and fails to make adjustments as they did Saturday, then Saturday's outcome, a nine-point loss, will possibly portend what's to come.

Star-divide

For the second time this year, UT's Bruce Pearl summoned the ghost of Ray Mears, and put together a game-plan fit for a king.  In the first meeting of the two teams, Pearl pulled out the 3-2 zone defense which had been sitting in the back of his closet, gathering dust.  The ploy nearly worked, in Lexington no less, as his out-manned visiting Vols fought valiantly and smartly, succumbing to the 'Cats not until the final nine minutes or so.  Saturday though, Pearl brought with him two golden nuggets of strategy, both of which befuddled, bemused, and in the end, sent the 'Cats back to Lex with bruised egos and motivation to get better.

This time around, Pearl chose to switch defenses, alternating between a straight-up 2-3, a 2-3 match-up, a straight 3-2, and man-to-man.  But, the most important (and game changing) component of Pearl's defensive philosophy was to "front" UK's big men, and anyone else who ventured onto the blocks for that matter.  This he did, regardless of which type of defense the Vols were executing. 

UK's response to the ploy was to shoot threes, which invariably were wide open, sometimes forced, and seldom true.  Instead of spreading the floor, which creates space, and throwing over top of the "coverage," UK continued to launch misguided rockets, which not surprisingly led to defeat.  I know, I know, it's called shooting them out of the zone, but after missing 10 of 11 three-point shots per half, some type of adjustment is in order, but none was forthcoming. 

Offensively, Pearl thought his players could take UK off the dribble, and unfortunately, it turns out the sweaty-one had a righteous feeling.  On Saturday, Kentucky gave up more points in the paint (an unfathomable 42) than it has against any team all year.  Whether it be Bobby Maze, Scotty Hopson, J. P. Prince, or Melvin Goins, Pearl instructed his team to drive, drive, drive.  They did, and UK couldn't stop them for nearly the entire first half, which is where the game was lost.  Editor's Note: I find it more than somewhat ironic the dribble-drive is what doomed the 'Cats Saturday.

Now, do I think the 'Cats played with poor effort and hustle?  No.  I thought the 'Cats played hard, but they didn't play smart basketball.  They did exactly what Pearl wanted them to do; take and miss the three.

But, given all that went wrong on Saturday, which was pretty much everything except UK's free throw shooting (21-21, 77.8%), John Wall, who played unimpressively for the first 25 minutes of the game, showed why NBA teams are salivating over him and his freakish ability.  His almost single-handed resuscitation of the near dead 'Cats was truly a sight to see, but the poor kid didn't have enough in the tank to finish the race.  He emptied his reserve playing catch-up: In Kentucky's 30-11 run from the 14:05 mark of the second half to 2:10 remaining, John Wall scored nine points and dished out four of his six assists.  Due to Wall's fast and furious pushing of the pace, UK scored 15 fast break points in the 12 minute span, and displayed to the college basketball world why no team wants to run with the 'Cats.

But aah, there's the rub --  No team wants to run with the 'Cats, and now, with an abundance of tape available to Wildcat opponents, a blueprint of sorts is now clearly evident to any coach willing to adopt a slow-down pace, and a "front" the Big Blue big men defensive stance.  Two tactics which serve to supplement the zone defense, which all of the world now knows is the only (or best) way to best the 'Cats -- And the rub, unless confronted by Kentucky with tickling twine, as well as points in the paint, will probably doom this team to an unpleasant ending.

Yet another unsatisfying aspect of Saturday's game were the final two minutes.  In games past, Kentucky's young guns have stepped-up, and closed out contests successfully, fueled by their now-famous refuse to lose game-ending tact, which is a euphemism for, they make shots and take care of the basketball.  But not Saturday; In the final 2:10, the 'Cats scored zero points and turned the ball over three times.  Cue Rocky Top, and get outta town.

The Three-Point Problem

As many scribes have written about over the last few days, UK's lack of a three-point threat, a pre-season area of concern, has reared its unwelcome head at the most inopportune time -- Over the last seven games, UK has combined to make only 20.3% of their three-point shots (24-118), and it's not just one or two 'Cats misfiring, it's the entire blue crew, save Patrick Patterson: Individually, the numbers break down thusly -- Darnell Dodson: 2-21 (9.5%); John Wall: 3-23 (13.0%); Eric Bledsoe: 5-25 (20.0%); DeAndre Liggins: 4-17 (23.5%); Darius Miller: 4-16 (25.0%); Patrick Patterson: 6-16 (36.5%) -- In UK's previous 22 games, the 'Cats made the long-range shot at a 39.1% rate (150-384), but that acceptable rate of made threes is at least a bit misleading.

Early in the season, UK got fat and happy dropping three bombs on, not hapless competition, but competition less talented than the teams Kentucky faces in the SEC, as well as the teams UK will confront in the NCAA Tournament -- Miami, OH (6-11 threes), Sam Houston State (11-22), Cleveland State (5-11), UNC-Asheville (8-18), Indiana (7-14), Austin Peay (8-12), Drexel (9-13), and Hartford (14-28) -- The 'Cats made the trey at a 52.7% rate in the eight games listed, in the other 21 games the 'Cats have played they've shot 28.4% from beyond the arc.  Simply put, those eight games represent the contests in which UK built their unwarranted reputation of being solid, if not spectacular, three-point shooters.  And in at least one instance, the home game against Vanderbilt where UK made 12 of 23 three-pointers, success is slightly spoiled (is that possible?) by the fact that the Commodores are ninth in the SEC in defending the three, giving up the long-bomb at a 34.4% rate.

Nearly as troubling is the fact that four of UK's five primary three-point threats are neophytes at being competent at  making the shot -- Darius Miller began shooting the three as a senior in high school, making around 30%.  Last year, Miller made 18 of 55 threes (32.7%); DeAndre Liggins wasn't known as a long-range shooter in high school, and last season Liggins made only 12 of 51 three-point shots (23.5%); Patrick Patterson, who is the only 'Cat to make an acceptable percentage of this three-point shots over the last seven games, only took up the shot in the off-season, in an effort to improve his NBA Draft stock; Neither John Wall nor Eric Bledsoe were proficient at the three-pointer in high school, in fact, their lack of a consistently accurate long-range shot was the major knock on both players coming out of high school.

My point?  These players do not have a plethora of positive experience to draw from when they begin to struggle against good competition.  Which is exactly what has happened.  To use a baseball analogy, they aren't  lifetime .300 hitters trying out break out of a slump, they are struggling rookies.  Which is the worst kind of rookie to be.   

Will a dose of confidence shake them out of their three-point doldrums?  Will UK find a way to dominate the paint without relying on the three-pointer to loosen the sagging zone?  This I don't know.  But, I do know what a championship team looks like, and at this point, the 'Cats don't have the chops.  Of course, that can change.  But the metamorphosis must occur soon, for with each passing three-point miss, the season that counts draws nearer. 

Thanks for reading, and Go 'Cats!

Comment 46 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

yepp, spot on

couldn’t have been said any better than that……

by Bluehound on Mar 1, 2010 9:35 PM EST reply actions  

Unfortunately I concur-

Lately, we’re not close to what I saw in Syracuse Saturday night…A well balanced, well oiled machine…

"You are what you are and you ain't what you ain't"

by iam4ukintn on Mar 1, 2010 9:44 PM EST reply actions  

Yes, Syracuse were scary good. Lunardi projects #1 seed in the South. KY #1 in the East

If we do manage #1 seed in the East and can get to the Final 4-not sure if East plays South?
Syracuse deserves the number 1 ranking this week hands down.

by blue oregon on Mar 1, 2010 9:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Ok

this isnt’ directed at you but Cuse people………….STOP! This team lost AT home to UofL. The team that probably won’t be a tourney team. Yes they played well on Saturday but if you haven’t noticed Nova has been falling apart. UK methodically pasted teams too. You cannot take one team and just say “they are number one”……….because the other teams before them lost…….now they are the favorite…….yuck. Doug G. from ESPN said it best. “Cuse, beat us a falling apart Nova team and the only reason they are number one is that everyone before them lost…….they still will get the third or fourth seed”.

by tenken on Mar 1, 2010 11:48 PM EST up reply actions  

The number one

rankings are a popularity poll based on who’s hottest lately. Syracuse gets its chance by winning in a week when others lost. It’s no big deal. Should Louisville win this weekend, then Syracuse will give it up to UK or KU whichever wins their games this week. So right now it is Syracuse’s turn. They won, they earned it.

by kywineman on Mar 2, 2010 7:42 AM EST up reply actions  

Well

to me your post is exactly why I don’t take it that seriously. Lately……key word…..and its becoming silly. I was glad though that Duke wasn’t able to go above us.

by tenken on Mar 2, 2010 9:57 AM EST up reply actions  

AMEN!

Happy Days are here again The sky is all ways BLUE again Happy days are here again !

by oldcat70 on Mar 2, 2010 1:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Me too.

That would have really ticked me off.

by kywineman on Mar 2, 2010 6:18 PM EST up reply actions  

While I am loathe to agree with Gottlieb about anything, on this point he may be right

If Syracuse stumbles this week, they get no more than the 3rd or 4th #1 seed. Those 2 losses at home have to count for something, considering the committee no longer looks at the last third of the season more heavily. This new seeding setup is going to make some people very uncomfortable. It was the right thing to do, because you do have to look at a team’s entire body of work. Syracuse could also easily lose 2 more games as they have a tough last week of the season AND that Big East Tourney. 2 losses added to the 2 losses they already have and they might slip to a 2 seed, but that is not very likely.

Resistence Is Futile......We Are Blue

by ALLBLUCAT on Mar 2, 2010 7:56 AM EST up reply actions  

Glad

you could spell his name…….I couldn’t :)

by tenken on Mar 2, 2010 9:56 AM EST up reply actions  

Unfortunately

Louisville gets Syracuse at home this week. Beating them again – this time being the number one ranked team – may be enough to take them from a “probably wont” to a “probably will” tourney team.

It is not worth an intelligent man’s time to be in the majority. By definition, there are already enough people to do that.

by kentuckygirl0724 on Mar 2, 2010 9:53 AM EST up reply actions  

At this point, UofL is safely in the tournament

They are in fifth place in a league that is likely to get 8 or 9 teams in the tournament.

I think they would have to practically lose out this week and their first Big East tourney game to miss the field entirely.

Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."

by chirop1 on Mar 2, 2010 3:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Wait, so this isn't about Cousins traveling via tesseract? I'm disappointed.

Just kidding, good piece Ken.

Question: did you go back and watch the game again or is this all stuff you remember from watching it live?

I think your observation about the 3pt experience of the guys is apt and is something I had not considered, I also think the comparison to baseball is on the money. Hopefully our rookies will develop quickly over the next 3-5 games.

3 > 2, except for very large values of 2.

by JLeverenz on Mar 1, 2010 10:25 PM EST reply actions  

Question?

I may be the only one dumb enough to ask! What is “tesseract”?

Happy Days are here again The sky is all ways BLUE again Happy days are here again !

by oldcat70 on Mar 2, 2010 1:14 PM EST up reply actions  

the tesser act?

It’s one of the bills being held up by Jim Bunning
LOL :)

No matter where you're at, there you are

by cincyblue on Mar 2, 2010 2:06 PM EST up reply actions  

It's part of a children's book written by Madeline L'Engle

Called “A Wrinkle in Time”

3 > 2, except for very large values of 2.

by JLeverenz on Mar 2, 2010 2:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Nice job Ken, and I am curious,

If we come out and light it up from 3 pt land the rest of the season will that allay anyone’s fears about how we shoot threes???

Probably not. We are just going to have to live with the label, even though I am convinced we are not as bad a spt team as everyone thinks we are. Our kids believe that Cousins and Patterson down low are better % shots than 3’s and I tend to agree…..but Coach wants them to shoot, and I understand that as well. I think we will find our balance and put this to bed before the tourney

Resistence Is Futile......We Are Blue

by ALLBLUCAT on Mar 1, 2010 10:35 PM EST reply actions  

??

If UK comes out and makes the three at a 35-37% rate, consistently, then they obviously solved whatever it is that currently ails them. But nothing they have done to this point in the season leads me to believe they can/will do that agaisnt top notch comp.

by Ken Howlett on Mar 1, 2010 10:42 PM EST reply actions  

well, I have to confess, I dont think the 3 is as important to this team as it is to others because we have

so many insde weapons. Even our guards are inside weapons….The comment was meant satirically….sorry. Admittedly, the 3 can be a weapon AGAINST this team, and if we get into a shooting contest with a hot shooting 3 point team, we better be able to penetrate and draw the foul with the shot to keep up, but that has not happened other than one time this year. SC hit some 3’s, and we lost to them and Devan the Dominiant, at their house…..we lost to UT because of defense, not because of 3 point shots, again, at their house. On a neutral floor, against just about everyone else, we draw even, and with our team’s road support, neutral games are not neutral. If Patterson, Cousins and Wall are all on their game and making their regular shots, AND we defend at a respectable clip, we dont lose to anyone.

Resistence Is Futile......We Are Blue

by ALLBLUCAT on Mar 2, 2010 7:50 AM EST up reply actions  

If they

play strong defense(interior, transitional, three point) and get the ball inside, they will not need more then six or seven threes……just saying. I am not worried.

by tenken on Mar 1, 2010 11:51 PM EST reply actions  

Ken, I respectfully disagree

It seems to me that the UK we have seen over the past 3 or so games is a team in the doldrums of league play with little left to play for. They are obviously not motivated into playing their best basketball (and they are still 27-2!). I think we are a team of superstars…. they mostly all have been since their freshman year in high school. Pressure is nothing new to them, but I think complacency is. I don’t think they’ve ever had to play this many games that really only kind of matter ( I know that they all technically matter, but I think you understand considering the mindset of an 18yr old)…. they know they are in the tournament, and most probably as a 1 seed. I bet they win the SEC tournament without much of a challenge…. because they will have what they haven’t had in a while, a real challenge, something to prove. That is not to say I think they didn’t try at UT, I think they just were looking past them. I know their shooting percentages are down but mathematical formulas about shooting trends don’t seem to apply to this team. They are a streaky bunch that thrives on momentum. One big dunk turns into six baskets and most probably an unwanted timeout from the opposition. I know Coach Cal called the Vandy game an elite 8 game, and I think the UT game was as well…. and we nearly squeaked it out, despite ourselves, not UT. Sure, TN played good, but had both teams been in top form, we win by 11 again. If this team has proven one thing to me, they don’t let lightning strike twice very often. I would expect to see a UK team with something to prove over the next two games, and then an unstoppable machine come tournament time…. We have players that love the limelight and the big challenge. They will definitely respond to the change of scenery because it’s all that they and their coach have been really talking about.

I left TN and now I am back in the Bluegrass... just in time for Football and Keeneland! Life is great!

by sleepytimetea on Mar 2, 2010 12:19 AM EST reply actions  

You make a good point

and the freshmen on the team haven’t developed the same level of disdain for some of our rivals that exists in the fanbase. They may see this as a bad loss while the fans see it as a really bad loss, after all – it’s Tennessee!
Pearl’s team and their fans were definitely up for the game to tourney level atmosphere and coming back from way down was not going to take the air out of the crowd. That in itself may have been a new experience for them; albeit, a good experience. We can only wait and see.

by hoboat33 on Mar 2, 2010 2:41 PM EST up reply actions  

I see this

as a good loss. No that losing to Tennessee is ever good but in the eyes of the basketball world it is hard for us to be judged more harshly for this loss than KU was when UT beat them. If we had to drop one of our last three, this was the one that hurts our overall ranking the least. Win the next two and the SEC tourney and we are sitting very pretty indeed.

by kywineman on Mar 2, 2010 6:23 PM EST up reply actions  

We're fine...

This team just needs a change. The goals all season were to be undefeated and to win a national championship. Once the first goal went down, focus has filtered to the next. Cal’s mantra has been number 1 seed. I can’t help but believe that this team is looking ahead to tourney time and salivating. Neutral floors, blue mist, and teams that don’t play us like we are their “Super Bowl” every night will be a welcome change and I think you will see them loosen up and shots will begin to fall. This loss is good for the Cats and I am not worried. They can still beat anyone in the country on any given night and when and if the 3 point shots start falling, no one can beat them.

Xbox Live Gamertag: hoopchi

by hoopchi on Mar 2, 2010 6:58 AM EST reply actions  

Using Oldie But Goodie From 1998

We’re the worst 27-2 team in the country!

by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 2, 2010 4:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Just a question...

Are you saying that teams competing in the NCAA tournament won’t play you like it’s their “Super Bowl”? Most teams really want to win, and will try to play the game of their lives, not necessarily because it’s Kentucky, but because if they lose, they go home.

"It breaks your heart. It is designed to break your heart. The game begins in the spring, when everything else begins again, and it blossoms in the summer, filling the afternoons and evenings, and then as soon as the chill rains come, it stops and leaves you to face the fall alone." A. Bartlett Giamatti

by sddbaker on Mar 2, 2010 4:16 PM EST up reply actions  

They'll play hard

but they won’t be playing on their own court with their own fans. Actually, the way Kentucky travels most games will sound like Kentucky is the home team. :-)

by hoboat33 on Mar 3, 2010 12:22 AM EST up reply actions  

We are worried too much about the three.

If we cut our turnovers in half, and be more patient in the half court, we win without ever needing the 3. We have 2 of the top Bigs in the country, and everyone is going on about the three. Feed the post, and quit throwing the ball away is the key to winning it all. The only way the three hurts us is if we shoot it. It is proven to be a bad decision over 60% of the time in our case.Only good things happen at the basket.

"all the way"

by ro307805 on Mar 2, 2010 10:22 AM EST reply actions  

Agreed

but we still have to losen up the defense a bit if they are all over our bigs down-low.

I use to love Happy Meals, now I love sushi, but I will always love Kentucky!

by ukcat1982 on Mar 2, 2010 10:26 AM EST up reply actions  

The problem is that we are not waiting for that to happen.

Wall is jacking up contested threes before the ball is even entered into the offense.That=turnover. If every possion becomes more important, the middle will become clogged, and then we can shoot jumpers of all ranges from 8-20 ft based on swinging the ball to the other side of the zone/ and/or penetrate and dish on the weak side of the zone. If the ball is already shot before it is worked around and the zone is probed; then it is a wasted possion.

"all the way"

by ro307805 on Mar 2, 2010 10:41 AM EST up reply actions  

I don't recall

Wall doing that very often. I would like to see them work the perimeter with crisp passing to open the shot up more or create a seam for penetration. I think one of the things we have under discussed on this blog is that this team is very often guilty of very lazy passing that results in interceptions.

by kywineman on Mar 2, 2010 6:27 PM EST up reply actions  

How will UK respond in the Georgia game...

Is what I feel is the most important right now!!! Who cares if they’ve had poor 3 point shooting in the past few games! Statistics don’t lie, but confidence can do some crazy things and if UK loses to Georgia, then that’s when we really have to start worrying about their 3-point shooting. They can pull themselves out of this slump in 1 or 2 games with a little confidence, but we first have to beat Georgia to get some of that confidence kick-started.

I use to love Happy Meals, now I love sushi, but I will always love Kentucky!

by ukcat1982 on Mar 2, 2010 10:25 AM EST reply actions  

Realistic, perceptive piece, Ken.

I’d add this. Remember when Cal used to say something like “We’re really more like 15-5 than 20-0”? He was right. From the start, we picked up some Ws that easily could have been Ls. This pattern of good fortune (augmented by a relatively weak schedule) is not likely to last all season, and in fact could be a detrimental factor in the long run. The Cats should view themselves as a top 10 team aspiring to join the top 5—and play accordingly.

by hgabenne on Mar 2, 2010 10:44 AM EST reply actions  

Just don't think we need the 3 to win..

Even with us missing everything it was a tied game game with 2 minutes to go. That is with a horrendous first half and beginning of the second. I think three’s just help this team, but they know they can score without them. If it was a team without an ability to get the the basket, or an inside presence, I’d agree with you, but that is not the case here. This team can score at will in most situations. They came from 19 down without making a three. I just think it’s a deficiency, but certainly not one that prevents them from cutting down the nets in March.

by JRod1229 on Mar 2, 2010 1:28 PM EST reply actions  

While it does not stretch out the defense

We certainly get a lot of “and 1” 3s.

All the driving by the guards seem to leave us open to the runouts we saw on Saturday.

by BCinVA on Mar 2, 2010 2:07 PM EST reply actions  

It certainly is a testament to the fans of UK

I have participated on this message board since Tubby’s last year at UK. I have read and seen lots of great things. Call me the eternal optimist when referring to our basketball program (I defended Coach G. up until the bitter end. I couldn’t believe that he really had those serious problems, I thought he just needed some rebuilding time. After all, he was our coach, which in this state ranks slightly above Governor in terms of influence) …..but I think 27-2 is pretty ($*#($*##$*#**@*@& amazing considering where we were this time last year. I don’t want to get involved or read analysis about shooting percentages and becoming pessimistic about our chances. I want to relish in the fact that we are the most athletic team in the country, one of the youngest teams in the country, and as Coach says, the team with the most upside. I want to send nothing but positive vibes to those men. I want to believe that our SUPERteam may just be a bit bored and waiting to prove themselves on a national level when the spotlight shines brightest… afterall, that’s what they’ve done up until this point. I don’t want to enter another post season contemplating the numbers and statistics of games that may have meant a lot less to these kids than they do to us. Does John Wall really hate UT the way we do? He grew up a UNC fan…. I think that win was much more important to him. We have a group of kids that really like each other, a great leader in Pat Pat and a coach who wrote the book on instilling confidence in young men. Let’s just let them make us happy and not worry about numbers so much. A win with a 15% 3PT looks just the same as one with a 50% in the record books. Ken, I mean no offense to you or your effort in this article. It was a very interesting read. I just don’t want to think of this team like I think of horses at Keeneland…. numbers and data…. I think they can be a lot more than that. GO CATS!!!!

I left TN and now I am back in the Bluegrass... just in time for Football and Keeneland! Life is great!

by sleepytimetea on Mar 3, 2010 12:51 AM EST reply actions  

This might be fall out

from Cal not putting any weight in the SEC. Most of the younger payers have never been on a losing team. Now they are told that the SEC means nothing.They may be waiting for games that mean something. I hope they can turn it back on when needed. The freshmen for the most part are not going to move up in grade in college. This is their swan song and need to finish in style. We need the next 2 games to win the SEC out right,and a good run in SECT. Go Cats!!

Happy Days are here again The sky is all ways BLUE again Happy days are here again !

by oldcat70 on Mar 3, 2010 3:07 AM EST up reply actions  

I still believe

that few will remember or care about winning the SEC regular season title especially if they could find a way to win the NCAA tourney. We didn’t pay Cal the big bucks for SEC titles.

by kywineman on Mar 3, 2010 9:29 AM EST up reply actions  

Have

we forgotten where we have been. Yes the title is not the best that we can get but its for sure a notch in our belt. Kentucky fans need to appreciate that. Just sayin.

by tenken on Mar 3, 2010 10:45 AM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

An exciting community-driven SBNation blog, by and for fans of the Kentucky Wildcats.

Community Guidelines
[UPDATED 01/18/2012]

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Louisvillelove_small
A death in the UK family

Recent FanPosts

323_small
UK Basketball: Kentucky Is In The Zone, Defense That Is
Emberlogo_sized_small
Anticipation Open Thread
Mostdiggity_small
Somethin' Strange: Zone-Busters or Carolina Fail?
Small
GOG 2011-12 #15: Vanderbilt
Small
DDMO A Figment Of Imagination?
Small
Derek Willis Interview with FOH
Small
Great article on Cats
323_small
Tempering Great Expectations: Do We Need Coaching From Calipari?
Small
Frustrated Fan!!
304labjbkcsj8uopp4ej_small
Just want to share what Hoosier fans seem to think of The Big Blue Nation

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Twitter Widget -- Follow me!


Managing Editor

Tru_small Glenn Logan

Editor

Wildcat_small BigSkyCat

Fl_family_photo_small Ken Howlett

Author

Small JLeverenz

Justified-olyphant_small jc25

Bluepaws_small a2d2

Img_0019_small Alex Scutchfield