Hat tip:  Chris Diggs.

Earlier this week, I wrote a long piece about the NCAA situation of Enes Kanter.  Eric Crawford of the Courier-Journal does something very similar, only he puts the matter in a pro-vs-con scenario.

Many of the same points I made, he makes, particularly in the pro-Kanter argument.  Some of the anti-Kanter points have also been alluded to, if not identically expressed, in criticism of my piece.

This is a long and fairly technical post, although Crawford does a bang-up job of making it understandable.  It's a cup-and-one-half of coffee to read, but well worth the time and effort if you want to be informed by an excellent and even-handed opinion.  Recommended.