The Big Blue Daily Mail -- Ryder Cup Edition
The Ryder Cup is in full swing this morning. I personally attended the last one at Valhalla, and it was one of the singular events in my life. This one has started rather inauspiciously with a weather delay due to heavy rains.
If you are a Ryder Cup fan, don't miss this piece by Gregg Doyel. It ought to get your competitive juices flowing, Tiger Woods fan or no.
Now, for the news.
-
Kentucky freshman Brandon Knight is Wildcats' workhorse | courier-journal.com | The Courier-Journal
Knight might well be a one-and-done talent himself, but he insists that's not his priority. Just because Rose, Evans and Wall jumped to the NBA after one season under Calipari, Knight said, doesn't mean he'll have to.
Hmm. We'll see.
- Basketball Blitz – Knight doesn’t mind comparisons to star guards | Vaught's Views
-
BBL: No Wildcat Wally this year for Madness John Clay’s Sidelines
John Clay's Big Blue Links.
-
SEC: Vandy tailgaters banned for being too loud John Clay’s Sidelines
John Clay's SEC links.
-
Calipari downplays — yet welcomes — high expectations | KentuckySports.com
With its record-setting five first-round picks in this year's NBA Draft and the departure of Ramon Harris and Perry Stevenson, Kentucky lost players responsible for 70.3 of the team's 79.3-point scoring average, lost players responsible for 34 of the 41.7-rebound average and lost players responsible for 485 of the 573 assists and 236 of the 273 blocks.
Those are sobering numbers. Yet you never know what can happen.
- The Game Plan: Joker Phillips' keys to the game -- UKAthletics.com
-
'Discipline' UK's watchword at Ole Miss | KentuckySports.com
"I'm sure they'll [Ole Miss] look at the film and say, 'Hmmm a freshman QB ran for five touchdowns on them out of the Wildcat (formation); we've got Jeremiah Masoli. That's what we're going to do,'" Lumpkin said. "If I was a coach, I'd do that. I'd line up in the Wildcat until we stopped it. We've got to be prepared for it. They've watched film. That's our résumé, and they've seen it."
Yeah, Ricky, that's pretty likely. And unless you and the rest of the defense learn to stop that kind of offense, you might just see it every game from now on.
-
Be sure to check out the new interviews Tom has up on his site.
- Forgotten Nazr Mohammed now starter for Charlotte | Vaught's Views
-
Rush The Court - Doc’s Kid to Duke: Austin Rivers Commits
Billy Donovan cannot be happy. I suppose this shows the pitfalls of taking commitments early. If you'll remember, Rivers committed to the Gators verbally two years ago.
-
Kentucky football practices getting ‘ugly' | courier-journal.com | The Courier-Journal
But defensive tackle Ricky Lumpkin said UK is in need of an attitude adjustment, noting that constructive criticism from coaches and teammates is rubbing some players the wrong way."
There's people that just don't care, or they'll say, ‘Why are you complaining?' " Lumpkin said. "That's what we have a bad habit of right now — people thinking that guys who are trying to help them out are just whining and complaining, when they actually care about the team and want the team to get better."
So what we have are a bunch of prima donnas? Good grief, guys, start singing from the same hymnal, will you?
-
Rush The Court - Morning Five: 10.01.10 Edition
Remember the story that class of 2011 uber-recruit Anthony Davis‘ father was requesting $200,000 for the services of his son for one year at the college of his "choice?" Two hundred large seemed like a hefty price tag to us at the time, that is, until we read this piece where a San Diego high school player named Chen Cai reportedly took over $30,000 in gifts from a Chinese marketing company called Zou Marketing.
Heh.
-
Several former Cats are making headlines as the NBA begins it's preseason. John Wall, DeMarcus Cousins, Chuck Hayes, and several other Cats have made headlines in the past few days. Here are some articles from some of UK's former players.
Read the whole thing.
-
Rush The Court - Two Michigan State Players Guilty of Poor Judgment, Possibly More?
This is quite possibly the reverse of the famous Duke case. Instead of innocent players being railroaded by prejudice and a rogue prosecutor, this is a case that, at least according to the victim, a case of prosecutorial cowardice.
So who do we believe? I don't know. He said/she saids are always tough, and there seems to be precious little other evidence.
-
Attorneys: Payments to ex-UNC coach were loans - NCAA Football - CBSSports.com
Attorneys for former North Carolina assistant coach John Blake say there was nothing seedy about loans their client received from longtime friend and sports agent Gary Wichard, and there was never an arrangement to direct players to Wichard once they left for the NFL.
Uglier and uglier.
-
Hold sympathy: College athletes need no paychecks - NCAA Football - CBSSports.com
College athletes aren't paid like professional athletes, but they're paid. If you didn't know that, well, now you do. Are they paid commensurate of what they're worth to their school? Not all of them, no. A guy like A.J. Green, who helps keep the Bulldogs in the national conversation when he plays -- and who saw the team go 1-3 when he doesn't -- is worth more money to the school than the price of his scholarship. I'm not telling you he isn't.
But what about the Bulldogs' other receivers? And their tight end? And an offensive guard and even that third-string safety, Alec Ogletree, who's on scholarship and who has contributed two tackles in three games. What's he worth?Doyel nails it. This is exactly why we cannot start paying players. Pay to play would solve nothing.
-
Appalachian State to study possible move up to FBS - NCAA Football - CBSSports.com
And they will probably soon become a very good D-I team if they make the jump.
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Glenn,
You have probably already read this, but I thought everyone would like a little insight from someone who was actually part of the NCAA videogame explosion starting a few years back who thinks the NCAA is going to have a hard time getting around their current lawsuits over paying the players for their likenesses. From Jay Bilas’ Blog:
While I have not read the pleadings in this case, based upon my experience in law, I believe the NCAA will have a difficult time defending against these claims. All you have to do is look at the video games licensed by the organization. In both football and basketball, NCAA-licensed video games happen to have players that clearly bear striking physical resemblance to the real-life players. They have the same look, build, race and jersey number, and their names are conveniently available to download and assign to the relevant player.
Several years ago, I was the voice of one of the NCAA-licensed games. When doing the voiceover work, I had to go through an exhaustive list of first names and last names that were catalogued in the game. The user had to assign a first and last name to each player, but it was all just a clever end-around in an attempt to avoid the appearance of directly using the players’ names and likenesses. The game constructed this fiction to make the player names seem like a generic list or some sort of phone book. But in 2004 and 2005, the games just happened to have names like Okafor, Redick, Diogu, Duhon, Bogut and Simien, which are hardly like Smith and Jones.
And oddly enough, there were players that matched the body type and jersey number of those already famous player names. How can the NCAA possibly explain that, and the fact that there was no corresponding capability to assign a name to the coaches in the game? The games are supposed to be realistic and they are, all the way down to the cheerleaders and the mascots. The coaches are not in the games because they would have to be paid for the use of their names and likenesses. Conveniently, the players do not have to be compensated because of the NCAA’s strict adherence to the amateur ideal.
Bilas, like myself and some others believe that either the NCAA changes it’s tune on the subject of compensating the players, or gives up the rights for the players to obtain compensation themselves.
I Shall Always Be The Cat......In The Hat!!! The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!
by Greg Alan Edwards on Oct 1, 2010 1:25 PM EDT reply actions
That's not what anyone is talking about.
No rational person disputes that players have rights to their likeness and the NCAA shouldn’t be able to use it for profit in a video game without paying the player. The extent to which a video game infringes on this right is something for the courts to decide.
I don’t dispute that. What I do dispute is that they should be paid in addition to their scholarship, or for using their images to promote NCAA contests which help pay for their scholarships. That is what Doyel is talking about.
These are two separate and distinct issues.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
I understand your point, however, if this opens the gates for compensation, do you think that it will be able to be kept seperate from things like
tournament revenues, bowl game revenues, and the like? I may be oversimplifying things, but it seems to me that if the Supreme Court decides that they must be compensated for the use of their likenesses, will it not lead to more cases that ask for the same thing in other circumstances? Just seems like it would have a snowball effect and not be isolated so to speak.
I Shall Always Be The Cat......In The Hat!!! The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!
by Greg Alan Edwards on Oct 1, 2010 3:22 PM EDT up reply actions
I mean, if the school gives me a jersey, and does not require that I return that jersey, should it not be mine
to do with as I please? If they required the return of that jersey it would be another matter I understand, but obviously they were not about to ask for it back. Or maybe they should.
I Shall Always Be The Cat......In The Hat!!! The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!
by Greg Alan Edwards on Oct 1, 2010 3:24 PM EDT up reply actions
The Green case at Georgia.....
I Shall Always Be The Cat......In The Hat!!! The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!
by Greg Alan Edwards on Oct 1, 2010 3:34 PM EDT up reply actions
Oh. Duh.
That one’s easy.
- he sold the jersey to an agent;
- the price was exorbitant.
The conclusion is, selling his jersey to the agent was nothing more than a transparent attempt to cloak taking money from said agent in the legitimacy of a commercial transaction, which was otherwise permissible, I presume.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
I don't know.
It depends upon what the Supreme Court says, if it ever says anything on the matter.
My feeling is it will not rule that athletes are entitled to blanket compensation for their images, just as you are I are not entitled to it. If we want money, the television crews would rather just not show our images.
Suppose, for example, that the court rules that players are entitled to money to play in NCAA games. Schools may then require them to waive that right in order to accept a scholarship in the future.
They are unlikely to make such a ruling, though, in my opinion.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Here's a link with some insight on the Green jersey thing at UGA
I’m not advocating players making money from selling their jerseys, gloves socks, jocks or whatever … but the lure is there …

by 










