A Sea Of Blue: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: MLB Trade Rumors: Edwin Jackson to the White Sox, DC next?

Kentucky's Freshmen Rebound From the Emotion of the Moment in Victory over Cards

Kentucky's 71-62 victory over the Louisville Cardinals on Saturday revealed much more about John Calipari's team than most could have imagined.  With emotions running high, spurred on by UK freshman DeMarcus Cousins' pre-game shoot-around extracurricular conversations with the rival Cards, the game began in a (fighting) fashion no one wants to witness.  But, after both teams decided to play ball, instead of engaging in Ali v. Frazier IV, both sets of fan bases were alternately treated to great play, poor play, and play best described as spectacular.

Simply put, the 'Cats Kitty corps displayed what can happen when youth is mixed with a red-hot rivalry -- Raw emotion, and questionable judgment -- But in the end, the 'Cats' talent, coupled with a display of maturity beyond their meager years, propelled UK's freshmen to a recovery from their emotional outbursts, lifting the 'Cats over an undervalued, and superbly coached Cardinal squad.

Star-divide

In a game that featured five technicals, 68 missed shots, 24 missed three-pointers, 37 turnovers, 18 steals, 10 blocks, 51 fouls, and a record-setting 24,479 rabid Rupp revelers, the UK freshmen, with an assist from the upperclassmen, led UK's emergence from the early fog of emotion, to the road to victory.  And leading the recovery process was ...

DeMarcus Cousins

The sad, and overlooked aspect of the Cousins/Jared Swopshire early-game encounter is the fact that Cousins showed great hustle in an effort to gain a loose ball.  At 6'11," Cousins hit the floor with a quickness not often seen in players his size, once again dispelling the knock (coming out of high school) on the big man that he takes plays off, he doesn't give all-out effort, all the time.

Although it was obvious, to me at least, that Cousins showed bad judgment with his elbow to the side of Swopshire's head, he quickly regained his composure and dominated the paint area on both sides of the floor.  In only 26 minutes of action, Cousins scored 18 points, grabbed 18 rebounds (four offensive), dished out three assists (two to cutters Wall and Bledsoe for layups, one to Patrick Patterson for a dunk), and recorded two blocks.  In the first half alone, UK's man-child snagged 12 boards, while his paint counterpart, Patterson, was scoring 12 points.  Quite an effective duo, indeed.  

But, most impressive to me was the speed in which Cousins let go of the pre and early-game verbal exchanges with his foes, and began to concentrate on making the Cards pay for, well, being Cards.  That shows a serious step forward for the easily riled Cousins.  Afterall, if I'm coaching against Cousins, I would instruct my team to get into his head ... bump him, talk a bit of smack to him.  Players easily taken off-task are many times easily defeated, but Cousins did not allow the emotion of the moment to dominate his thoughts.  He channeled that emotion into punishing his challengers.  That's growth, and a very large reason the 'Cats came out victorious.

The next 'Cat in line for some atta boys is ...

Eric Bledsoe

Seven seconds into the game, and Bledsoe goes nuclear.  Apparently unhappy with a conversation he was engaged in with U of L's Samardo Samuels and/or Reginald Delk, Bledsoe clearly lost his cool, and gave "the business" to his Cardinal counter-point purveyor.  Once again, a carryover from the pre-game activities, Bledsoe displayed that which typifies many young college athletes -- An inability to control his emotions.

But to his great credit, Bledsoe, after being sat for several minutes (he played only 11 first half minutes) by John Calipari, recovered from his unpleasant opening salvos to play one of the best defensive games (primarily on U of L senior guard Edgar Sosa) someone not named Ramon Harris has played, while wearing "Kentucky" across their chest.  And just as key to a UK victory, Bledsoe made his free throws when they mattered the most; In the final minutes:  With Kentucky up 58-48, and 3:44 remaining in the contest, Bledsoe calmly sank two free throws to put the 'Cats up 12.  Two-minutes later, with 1:13 left in the game, and UK up 62-55, Bledsoe once again connected on his two charity shots.  And finally, putting the game on ice, Bledsoe swiped the ball from U of L's Samuels with :42 seconds remaining, and followed-up his great defense by sinking two more free throws at the :30 second mark, putting the Wildcats up by an insurmountable 11 points.

Six of six from the free throw line, and a steal.  All in the final 3:44 of the titanic tilt.  Despite his youth, inexperience, and inability to let opponents' words roll off his 6'1" frame, Eric Bledsoe knows what it takes to win basketball games -- Defense, and making big shots, whether they be free throws, or three-pointers.  The under-heralded freshman from Alabama won't remain so if he continues to play with the passion, determination, and skill often reserved for much older players.

And speaking of passion,determination, and skill, UK's other man-child with game comes to mind, and his name is ...

John Wall

While UK's superstar freshman point guard didn't partake in the "chippy" chattering taking place on both sides of the aisle early in the contest, Wall was greatly effected by the defense Rick Pitino threw at him.  From the beginning of the game, it was apparent that Pitino's method of minimizing Wall's impact on the game was to release his guards on the Cardinal shot, thus leaving Wall with, at best, a two-on-two, or two-on-three fast break.  And by the time help arrived in the form of his teammates, the secondary break was quashed because of the Cardinal's ability to match-up quickly with their defensive responsibility.  In the first half, Pitino's defensive game-plan, in regards to UK's fast-break ability, resulted in multiple turnovers for Wall (four to be exact), and poor, forced shots (1-5 from the field in the opening frame) taken early in the shot clock

Caught trying to do too much, Wall played like a freshman in the first half.  Instead of showing his frustration through his words, though, he dribbled through traffic, force-fed passes, and took the previously mentioned bad shots.  But, showing an ability to adjust, Wall was Wall when it mattered most: With U of L taking their only lead of the game, 42-41 with 9:51 remaining, Wall proceeded to score six straight points, putting the 'Cats in a lead they would never relinquish -- The first two of his six points came on a nice drive to the basket, resulting in a layup at the 9:32 mark, and then, in the money-shot of the game, Wall took on 6'10" Terrence Jennings and drilled a 15-footer, putting the 'Cats up three points.  Feeling his oats, Wall then drew a foul on a drive, and sank his two free throws.  Immediately following, Perry Stevenson's masterfully executed reverse layup was made possible by Wall's penetration of the Cards' outstanding two-three zone.  Cardinal surge trumped by wonder-Wall.

Overcoming a poor first half, and fighting cramps, Wall recovered to make four of five second half shots (for 14 points), dish out two assists, and most importantly, commit only one turnover in the face of the Cardinal pressure.  Although disappointed in his 7 of 12 free throw shooting (58.3%), Wall again displayed a will-to-win, and the talent to take-over, when the opponent closes the scoring gap.

The Best of the Rest

Daniel Orton -- Playing only eight minutes, and scoring zero points, Orton never-the-less set the 'Cats' defensive tone early by swatting a Cardinal shot with a purpose ... the purpose ... to let the Cardinals know anything other than a three-point shot was going to be heavily and enthusiastically challenged.  Orton added another block and a steal in his eight minutes.  Likewise, only playing eight minutes was DeAndre Liggins, but he made those minutes count, as he displayed a deft feel with his touch pass to Patrick Patterson for a dunk late in the first half.

Ramon Harris -- He committed three turnovers in his 23 minutes, but Harris did a masterful job on Edgar Sosa (3-11 from the field and six turnovers) for most of the game. 

Patrick Patterson -- Regardless of his missed game-clinching dunk, Patterson as usual, played his steady-Eddie contest.  His staunch defense, and 7-10 shooting, ensured UK won the point battle in the paint, 40-24. 

The Final Word 

A wise coach once told me that allowing my emotions to overtake my focus was the height of selfishness.  Responding to taunts, or being the taunter, might make me feel better, but it hurts the team.  It's a lesson most times hard-earned, but Kentucky, due to their incredible talent, and ability of re-focus on the task at hand, learned through victory that all that matters is who can look at the scoreboard at the end of the game, with a smile on their face.

Was it pretty?  No.  Was it the best UK can play?  No.  But, in a rivalry game filled with such emotion and bad blood, Kentucky's fabulous freshmen fought through their self-defeating impulses to out-execute an older, more experienced, expertly coached squad of talented players.  That, my friends, is all we can ask.

Thanks for reading, and Go 'Cats!

1 recs  |  Comment 73 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I thought Tru said it was time to let this go???......lol

Nice introspective there KH……I figured you for a big write up on Brooks today though….or Paris……lol….one of you anyway……

Remember, we're having fun now!!!

by ALLBLUCAT on Jan 4, 2010 2:36 PM EST reply actions  

Well, I had a major issue with my computer yesterday

which is when I was going to post, but I had to finish it up this morning.

I’ll have something on Brooks later.

by Ken Howlett on Jan 4, 2010 2:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Another Good Write Ken

I think you got it right again.

Happy Days are here again The sky is all ways BLUE again Happy days are here again !

by oldcat70 on Jan 4, 2010 2:59 PM EST reply actions  

Wall

Didnt Wall get T’d up in a double technical with some UL player for jawing? If my memory is correct, seems as if he did get in on a little of the “chippy” chattering as well though granted not to the extreme of the Cousins or Bledsoe situations.

It is not worth an intelligent man’s time to be in the majority. By definition, there are already enough people to do that.

by kentuckygirl0724 on Jan 4, 2010 3:22 PM EST reply actions  

That was nothing, at least in my opinion.

Neither Wall nor Smith would have been T’ed if not for the earlier scuffles.

I chalked that up to “over-officiating.”

by Ken Howlett on Jan 4, 2010 4:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Still a Technical

Nothing or not – exact same stat received for Wall as Cousins and Bledsoe.

It is not worth an intelligent man’s time to be in the majority. By definition, there are already enough people to do that.

by kentuckygirl0724 on Jan 4, 2010 9:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Which is one

of the problems with stats, they don’t paint the whole picture.

by kywineman on Jan 4, 2010 11:56 PM EST up reply actions  

This is true.

It is what it is, however, and my point is just that it doesnt matter how much “worse” we consider the other two guys techincal fouls during that game because when it comes down to it all three guys got the same call and it all looks the same in the stat line.

It is not worth an intelligent man’s time to be in the majority. By definition, there are already enough people to do that.

by kentuckygirl0724 on Jan 5, 2010 9:09 AM EST up reply actions  

What no one seems to be willing to allow for in this is that

a few years back Christian Laettner steps in the middle of a guys chest and he doesnt see any repercussions…..no “thug” image for him……crap, he even does commercials with Pitino for crying out loud…….what I am beginning to wonder is, how much of this “image” that Cousins seems to have falls back on his being an african american…..I am not trying to be political here, but you see other guys get away with this stuff and no one opens their mouth…..the kid threw a forearm and we want him shipped to reform school? He should not be allowed on the court?….He needs to seek counseling??…..c’mon gang….

Remember, we're having fun now!!!

by ALLBLUCAT on Jan 5, 2010 9:50 AM EST up reply actions  

??

Not really sure why this is linked to my comment…

It is not worth an intelligent man’s time to be in the majority. By definition, there are already enough people to do that.

by kentuckygirl0724 on Jan 5, 2010 9:58 AM EST up reply actions  

you got me to thinking about it again Tink...lol...

thats all….didnt mean to intrude….

Remember, we're having fun now!!!

by ALLBLUCAT on Jan 5, 2010 10:21 AM EST up reply actions  

Lol - no intrusion.

I was just hoping I wasnt somehow being lumped in with your “opposition” on this matter.

It is not worth an intelligent man’s time to be in the majority. By definition, there are already enough people to do that.

by kentuckygirl0724 on Jan 5, 2010 10:50 AM EST up reply actions  

No, I am just trying to ascertain why this incident

is such a big friggin deal.

Remember, we're having fun now!!!

by ALLBLUCAT on Jan 5, 2010 10:51 AM EST up reply actions  

Gotcha :)

It is not worth an intelligent man’s time to be in the majority. By definition, there are already enough people to do that.

by kentuckygirl0724 on Jan 5, 2010 10:57 AM EST up reply actions  

Re: kentuckygirl

Yes, a tech is a tech is a tech, but very different actions led to those techs, and Wall’s “action” was benign, at best, where as, Cousins and Bledsoe’s actions were demonstrably more deserving of their punishment.

I’m not concerned with the stat sheet on this one, only the actions that led to the referees decisions.

by Ken Howlett on Jan 5, 2010 2:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Thats certainly your perrogative.

As it is mine to focus on the fact that in the grand scheme of things all the actions received the same consequence regardless of how deserving or not we as spectators perceived them to be.

It is not worth an intelligent man’s time to be in the majority. By definition, there are already enough people to do that.

by kentuckygirl0724 on Jan 5, 2010 3:45 PM EST up reply actions  

For the purposes of the article

“While UK’s superstar freshman point guard didn’t partake in the “chippy” chattering taking place on both sides of the aisle early in the contest …"

It’s not my perception that Wall didn’t behave in the same manner as his teammates, it’s a fact. Which was shy I pointed to Wall as not participating in the pre and early-game shenanigans, but rather, what he had to overcome was U of L’s defense.

The entire point of the piece was to point out that UK’s youngsters all overcame something, and then went on to have good games.

by Ken Howlett on Jan 5, 2010 3:53 PM EST up reply actions  

KSR

indicated that Wall and Bledsoe were in fact participating in the pre game shenanigans. While I know that KSR is often scoffed at when brought up in situations like this (I am guilty of that as well) Matt Jones wrote this particular piece and while he is often guilty (IMO) of letting his personal feelings influence his writing, he is not one to out and out fabricate something:

During introductions, the Louisville players didnt "run out" as usual, but stayed in a huddle while their names were called. As both teams came on the floor for the tip, Smith, Sosa, Wall and Bledsoe had some nice words for each other.

(Emphasis mine)

I am not trying to villify Wall in any way, I’m just saying that its not really fair to try and paint Cousins and Bledsoe as a sinner and Wall as a saint. He definitely has MUCH better control over his emotions, but he did allow UL to get under his skin a bit, too.

It is not worth an intelligent man’s time to be in the majority. By definition, there are already enough people to do that.

by kentuckygirl0724 on Jan 5, 2010 4:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah

The day I use KSR as a source is the day I put up the typewriter.

by Ken Howlett on Jan 5, 2010 6:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Sounds a bit harsh

I have no real problme with KSR, it’s just that I don’t/haven’t ever used them or anyone like them as a source of info on a piece I’m writing.

Also, I’ve not painted anyone as a saint or a sinner. Once again, I’ve only illustrated what UK’s frosh overcame to win a very tough ballgame. Be it their own demons, or the competitions gameplan.

by Ken Howlett on Jan 5, 2010 6:35 PM EST up reply actions  

If you watch it again, there was literally nothing that warrented a Double Technical.

The ref was just trying to stop anything from happening, which was something the refs did the entire game.

by BleedinUKBlue on Jan 4, 2010 3:29 PM EST reply actions  

Actually

I remember watching the game live when that took place and thinking that though it didnt look like much that there WAS something going on there. I called it when I saw it seconds before the double T.

It is not worth an intelligent man’s time to be in the majority. By definition, there are already enough people to do that.

by kentuckygirl0724 on Jan 4, 2010 4:17 PM EST up reply actions  

actually ...

The referee had stepped and had a brief discussion with both players, most likely telling them to stop jawing. As soon as he went back to resume play, they started yapping again.

I’m guessing that he gave them a serious warning (in an attempt to stop any flare-ups) and that they both promptly ignored the warning.

When I was younger (many a year ago) if a referee ever told you to do something you didn’t say anything more than “Yes, sir”. I’m willing to think that the official in this case was doing his job, and that the 2 players weren’t behaving sociably :)

by jeffy on Jan 4, 2010 5:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Always good Ken, might I add...

so far the team has taken everybody’s super bowl punch, and are still standing tall. Now let’s hope that this has prepared them for conference play, especially on the road.

by UK1972 on Jan 4, 2010 3:52 PM EST reply actions  

Yet another well written piece from Mr. Howlett

Everyone keeps talking like John Wall is a shoe-in for the number 1 overall NBA pick next summer… but I think he may end up as the number 2 pick, right behind the stellar play of DeMarcus Cousins.

Seriously, how can a NBA scout look at Cousins 18/18 game and the obvious ability to take coaching (see improving free throws) and not salivate over that?!!?

Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."

by chirop1 on Jan 4, 2010 4:04 PM EST reply actions  

That is so true chirop1

The so-called national “experts” are saying if you have the #1 pick, you take John Wall even if you don’t need a great guard and figure out what you are going to do then. But the team picking #1 might have a stellar guard and decide they need Big Cuz (if he goes) inside the paint. We will be watching, I am sure.

And Ken,……excellent read, as usual. :-)

Blue... there is no other color to Bleed !!!

by a2d2 on Jan 4, 2010 4:11 PM EST up reply actions  

This is SO very interesting to me.

For fear of polluting Ken’s lovely piece with unrelated material, I don’t really want to comment here, but, chirop, would you mind if I used this idea and post of yours as my muse? Unless, of course, you wanted to come up with something on your own? : )

by BigSkyCat on Jan 4, 2010 4:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Have at it

Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."

by chirop1 on Jan 4, 2010 5:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Cousins' "weaknesses" from NBADraft.net

The biggest concern with him right now is the lack of explosiveness … He is very effective at the current level because he simply outmuscles opponents, but once he faces bigger defenders, his athleticism (or lack thereof) will be exposed further. His post game is predicated on brute force, but he has not really shown many reliable back-to-the-basket moves … His motor might also be an issue as he gets winded fairly quickly, but it could just be the lack of conditioning …

by mrmondaynite on Jan 4, 2010 4:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Agree to a point

But, Cousins’ rapidly improving footwork is also a reason he is able to get off shots in the midst of multiple defenders.

Another year-and-a-half of college would do wonders for him, but as we know, the pro’s draft on potential, and he has LOADS of that.

by Ken Howlett on Jan 4, 2010 4:48 PM EST up reply actions  

also,

that same “weakness” that mrmondaynite lists above is the same as it was this summer. I’m not too sure the strengths and weaknesses of players are updated on those draft sites like draft status is?

by BigSkyCat on Jan 4, 2010 4:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks Mr. Chirop :)

Considering the premium the NBA puts on big men (because there are so few), Cousins is certainly rounding in to a 5 pick.

by Ken Howlett on Jan 4, 2010 4:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Scary

Not to look too far ahead, but if Cousins does leave, UK will only have Orton/Harrelson to man the paint next year (as things stand now).

But, I’m sure Cal recognizes that possibility, and will recruit appropriately :)

by Ken Howlett on Jan 4, 2010 5:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Time to put the DDMO into full effect next year then!

Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."

by chirop1 on Jan 4, 2010 5:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, Cal obviously has scaled back the DDMO

Gillispie was the posterboy for trying to shoehorn his system into the players he had, rather than dictating his playstyle off what was available. Cal has said often that he is relying on more high-low sets and other offensive schemes that take advantage of Kentucky’s unusual size advantage.

Next year’s team will have the perfect set-up for his DDMO with 4 perimeter players and Orton.

Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."

by chirop1 on Jan 4, 2010 5:26 PM EST up reply actions  

agree

Cal normally doesn’t use a true post player, liking all 5 players facing up to the basket. If this year’s team has unusual success with a true center, he may rethink his DDMO to an extent to continue what he has with Orton next year with a back up. I don’t think there are anymore Cousins/Ortons available for 2010 left though.

by UK1972 on Jan 4, 2010 5:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments...

…like this one by Wall (emphasis mine)…

“I’m playing at another level I never thought I could play at,” Wall said. “I always played good when I was in high school but playing for [Kentucky coach John] Calipari, he’s going to take you to another level and get you better. I thought I was at the top of my potential when I was in high school. I’m nowhere near it.”

…might help with recruiting.

by atom on Jan 4, 2010 8:48 PM EST up reply actions  

3 of the top 5

I feel Patterson is a lottery pick, but I doubt he’s top 5 material.

Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."

by chirop1 on Jan 4, 2010 5:23 PM EST up reply actions  

My main problem with Cousins is still that he's a black hole in the paint

Every ball that gets passed into him is going to be shot.

If he can effectively show that he can pass out of the double-team, I think he’ll improve his draft stock.

Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."

by chirop1 on Jan 4, 2010 5:29 PM EST up reply actions  

...and stop putting the ball on the floor

two or three times when surrounded. (IMO)

It is not worth an intelligent man’s time to be in the majority. By definition, there are already enough people to do that.

by kentuckygirl0724 on Jan 4, 2010 9:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Cousins immaturity will cause concern

for anybody. Wall seems to have the temperament. Plus, big men come along a lot more than the potential of being the best point guard in the game.

by Grasslands1 on Jan 4, 2010 8:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Great write up Ken

and alot of good points made …. What do you make of Darius Millers’ play? He seems to be going the other way – he has so much to offer this team.

On Cousins to the NBA … I’m thinking lottery at this point – he is developing fast but it seems like he needs some sort of move from 8-10 feet … I’m sure any team could find room for him on their roster.

On recruiting … I think Cal has shown potential recruits (Tobias Harris decommitting??? or CJ Leslie) that if they have the skill set to be on the floor at this level – they won’t be held back,

by ukcris on Jan 4, 2010 10:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks ukcris

Miller — I love Miller, but he seems to be falling into a pattern similar to last season. He just seems ot disappear at times. He’s an extremely unselfish player, and with all of the talent surrounding him, he demures too often. I know I’ve heard Cal, a couple of times, yell at him to shoot. I think it’s all about confidence with Miller, and he just isn’t playing with any right now, which is why he played only 8 minutees Saturday.

Cousins – I’d take him every day of the week and twice on Sunday, if I were an NBA GM. Once he really understands how to play the game (a point Tru and I recently discussed), he’s going to be awesome. His footwork is strong, and he always seems to be around the ball when it comes off the rim. That’s a good instinct to have.

Recruiting — I made a half-serious comment somewhere in this thread about the potential lack of big men next year, but I’m not really wroried. Cal will get the job done, and as chirop said, there’s always the dribble-drive.

You make a good point about Cal not holding players back. That, and what we’re hearing from John Wall about how much better Cal has made him (his words), are recruiting gemstones. Kids pay attention to that … let’s just hope they’re 6’10" or bigger :)

by Ken Howlett on Jan 5, 2010 1:53 AM EST up reply actions  

Patterson

is the glue to this team. He just does everything so well and so smoothly, he doesn’t get the attention the others get.

by oldkentucky on Jan 4, 2010 5:27 PM EST reply actions  

No, and he's deferring too much IMO

Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."

by chirop1 on Jan 4, 2010 5:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks for Noting Cousins' Hustle

When was the last time you saw a 6-11, 265 pound freshman high school AA phenom going on the floor after a loose ball like a walk-on trying to get a few minutes of PT?

I thought Cousins and Shropshire both were just going after a loose ball. What got the ref’s attention was the pushing by Delk and the other Louisville player after Cousins got up off the floor.

I would encourage Cousins to continue to vigorouly pursue loose balls.

by Fortunatus on Jan 4, 2010 6:34 PM EST reply actions  

Cousins Ahead Of Superman

Though lacking the explosiveness of Dwight Howard, DeMarcus Cousins is ahead of where Howard was at the same age as far as offensive skills are concerned, plus he has better hands. Howard is still a very unpolished offensive center who relies totally on his strength, explosiveness and physique. I would not at all be surprised if Cousins surpasses Howard as a skilled and productive NBA 5 this decade.

To pick a nit: Cousins did not strike Swopshire with an elbow.

"Learn(ing) without thinking begets ignorance. Think(ing) without learning is dangerous."
-Confucius

by Wild Weasel on Jan 4, 2010 7:40 PM EST reply actions  

You're right, he didn't.

He just rubbed a forearm on Swopshire’s chin.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Truzenzuzex on Jan 4, 2010 8:13 PM EST up reply actions  

and he was provoked, I tell you!

He was provoked!!! (ok, I’m done now) : )

by BigSkyCat on Jan 4, 2010 8:17 PM EST up reply actions  

heehee :-D

Hang in there BSC !!!

Blue... there is no other color to Bleed !!!

by a2d2 on Jan 4, 2010 8:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks a2d2. Just got back to Niketown on New Years...

9 days in the Bluegrass State. My daughter was thrilled with the all the pregame…fireworks, sold out crowd and of course the Wildcats themselves. After the game, a childhood friend (who works at UK) took us on a personal tour of the Craft center.

I was truely excitied with the inside tour of Memorial Colliseum, the Men’s basketball facility and all of the UK history/pictures of all the teams and Hall of Fame etc…

by blue oregon on Jan 4, 2010 11:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Great weekend!

It sounds like you and your daughter had a memorable experience.

But you forgot to take this artic freakin’ weather back to the Pacific Northwest with you!!

I’m glad you guys had a great time!

by Ken Howlett on Jan 5, 2010 2:00 AM EST up reply actions  

The Refs

when the two UofL players began shoving

by Fortunatus on Jan 4, 2010 10:28 PM EST reply actions  

Nice Ken

I’ll add something else about Bledsoe: I thought he did a fantastic job handling the ball and the offense when Wall went out with cramps in the 2nd half.

I’ve been impressed with Cousins hustle all season. He habitually dives to the floor after loose balls and does his best to get into position to draw charges.

3 > 2, except for very large values of 2.

by JLeverenz on Jan 4, 2010 10:34 PM EST reply actions  

You know, great point about Bledsoe

I have no quarrels whatsoever with the effort I’ve seen from Cousins all year. Quite honestly, it’s been a surprise given his rep. Many times, though, those that bad-mouth talented players are oftentimes jealous.

by Ken Howlett on Jan 5, 2010 1:56 AM EST up reply actions  

The Refs Initially Were Cool with the Action on the Floor

They called a held ball or whatever with regard to Shropshire and Cousins going for the ball. They whistled up the Ts on the two Louisville players because they jumped in and started pushing. Then they complained about Cousins. The refs went over and looked at the replay and decided to T up Demarcus too.

I thought it was unfair, but I think they were trying to be fair and defuse a potentially explosive situation. Cousins nailed it in his comment after the game: “Shropshire couldn’t take it.”

Demarcus is my man. Cal has him under control.

Sorry about the partial messages. New keyboard.

by Fortunatus on Jan 4, 2010 10:38 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

"Shropshire couldn’t take it."

+1

It is not worth an intelligent man’s time to be in the majority. By definition, there are already enough people to do that.

by kentuckygirl0724 on Jan 5, 2010 9:17 AM EST up reply actions  

Kudos to the Refs on Saturday afternoon

Yeah, 51 fouls made the game agonizingly choppy, not chippy.
Their only other recourse was the Kentucky National Guard.

That pre-game stuff… the ref’s saw it, probably could not have done anything about it, and tried to prevent a civil war with their whistles. All power to them. I say we give them guns. It’s the American way…

No matter where you're at, there you are

by cincyblue on Jan 5, 2010 7:48 AM EST reply actions  

Heh, I think I'm onto something

Arm the refs.
Instead of the Technicals, one ref goes to Swopshire, the other to Cousins. Both pull out a Smith & Wesson Model 13 and say, “Go ahead thug, make my day.”
:)

No matter where you're at, there you are

by cincyblue on Jan 5, 2010 8:02 AM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

An exciting community-driven SBNation blog, by and for fans of the Kentucky Wildcats.

Community Guidelines
[UPDATED 4/10/2010]
Start posting about the Wildcats »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

Twitter Widget -- Follow me!

SBNation.com Recent Stories

INDIANAPOLIS - APRIL 02:  A detail picture of the basketballs as the Duke Blue Devils during practice prior to the 2010 Final Four of the NCAA Division I Men's Basketball Tournament at Lucas Oil Stadium on April 2, 2010 in Indianapolis, Indiana.  (Photo by Andy Lyons/Getty Images) +10 updates

NCAA Announces Plan For 'First Four,' Featuring Field Of 68 Play-In Games

Villanova guard Scottie Reynolds, top, is fouled by Drexel guard Jamie Harris (12) in the first half of a men's NCAA  college basketball game Wednesday, Dec. 2, 2009, in Villanova, Pa. (AP Photo/Michael Perez)

Two Drexel Basketball Players Arrested, Accused Of Armed Robbery

+1 updates

UNLV's Tre'Von Willis Arrested On Multiple Charges

More from SBNation.com >


Managing Editor

Tru_small Truzenzuzex

Editor

Carly_small Ken Howlett

Author

Small JLeverenz

Diane_1_small BigSkyCat

Small Travis Hubbard