Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Nevin Shapiro Vows To Bring Down Miami

Kentucky 71, Louisville 62:  Postmortem

Well, that was fun.

The Louisville Cardinals gave an absolutely outstanding effort.  They played hard, they tried every trick in the book.  They took no prisoners and they asked no quarter.  I like that in a team, and even if their fans are a bit raw about the scrum in the first half that resulted in three technical fouls (two against Louisville, and one against Kentucky), the Cardinals team gave a good account of themselves, just as I expected they would.  In fact, they had a chance to win the game, but as you see so often in games where the home team gets a big early lead and the visitor makes a big comeback, they simply could not sustain it.

This was a game of raw emotion, and overcoming raw emotion.  To my surprise, either Calipari had this team in a ridiculously high place coming into this game, or the players simply let the hype and the smack talk get the best of them.  Either way, this was by far the most intensity and physicality I have seen out of this young Kentucky team on both ends of the floor.  I can't say for sure whether it was good or bad, because excess intensity is never good.  In the end, though, the Kentucky Wildcats prevailed, and bottom line, that's all that matters.

I must discuss the Cousins episode, because it is out there, and we can't ignore it.  College basketball, these days at least, has become excessively physical.  Cousins actions in the scrum was hardly unprecedented in scrums like that, but there is no doubt it was over the top.  I think the officials, judging by the standard set in the Kentucky versus Duke game in 1992, made the correct call. 

Cousins unquestionably made unnecessary and excessive contact with bad intentions.  But in the Duke game, as in this game, no players were ejected.  Whether you think he should have been, or not, I think the standard set by that game was properly applied today.  I pass no judgment on the officiating -- they saw what we saw, and their decision was consistent with 1992.  Whether it should have been or not is up to the reader to decide.  Myself, I figure what is good for the goose is good for the gander.  This time, Kentucky was the goose.  Sorry, Cardinals -- you have a right to complain, but I should warn you that it has done us no good for 18 years.  I guarantee the result will be identical for you.

Moving on, I want to briefly comment on Rick Pitino's press conference.  It was simply spectacular.  Not only did I agree with every word out of his mouth, he specifically declined to blame anyone for the loss, and did so without any double entendres or obvious sarcasm.  It was, on balance, flawless, and under the circumstances, remarkable.  My respect for Rick Pitino just rose substantially, and it was already pretty high with respect to his coaching ability, at least.

More after the jump.

Star-divide

Obviously, I am pleased with the outcome, but less than pleased with the execution.  Kentucky should have buried the Cardinals under a fusillade of points in the first half, but either by dint of great Cardinal defense or inept UK offense, they did not.  I would guess it was a bit of both.

I am wild about the fact that UK set a new Rupp Arena attendance record with this game.  That's how it should be, and Kentucky should manage to get one more patron in every year from now on when the game is at Rupp.

I have nothing but praise for the Cardinals.  They played hard, they never gave up, and they came from behind to make this game very competitive and interesting.  Yes, they got down huge early, but due to some bizarre UK miscues and some good play, they managed to recover from the worst of it all and turn this into a very entertaining ball game.

Here are my observations:

  • 18 points, 18 rebounds for Big Cuz, but he could have gotten himself ejected after 1 and 2.  I hope he learns something from this game.  Even in the scrum, you have to avoid excessive contact.
  • Patrick Patterson was terrific.  I know you think he didn't get enough rebounds, but that is more a sign of experience than anything else.  Cousins just sucks up every rebound available, and Patrick has learned just to set sail for the opposing goal when a shot is missed.  That's why he gets so many wide open dunks.   17 points and 4 rebounds
  • John Wall was great at times, and awful at times.  In the first half in particular, he did some weird stuff.  But in the second half, he was really clutch.  His defense was as good today as it is likely to get.
  • Darius Miller was MIA today.  'Nuff said.
  • How huge was Ramon Harris?  Any of you that read this blog regularly know that I love this guy, but today, he didn't make a huge impact on the stats.  But oh, what an impact he made on the game with a huge three late in the second half.  When a guy like Harris sees 23 minutes on a team as talented as this, you know there is a reason.
  • Daniel Orton had one big block, but other than that, he was not effective today.
  • Game ball, Eric Bledsoe.  His defense on Edgar Sosa in the second half was the difference in the game.
  • Color me impressed by Jared Swopshire.  He was outmanned by Patterson, but without him, the Cardinals were bird nest soup.
  • The combination of Cuz and Orton held Samardo Samuels to only 3-7 all day.  Great post defense.

In the end, this was about the game we should have expected.  I admit, I am surprised at the emotionalism of the players considering most of Kentucky's guys were freshmen, but in the end, it served them well.

Breathe deep the vapour of victory, Wildcat fans.  You don't have to listen to any smack at all from the Red Ones this year.

Comment 160 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Something was up with Wall.

He was at the end of the bench during part of the game and then went to the locker room during one tv timeout. Definitely looked not 100%. This is my second game breaking the attendance at Rupp ;-) so I’ll take credit for it haha. It was bedlam in there at the beginning of this game and anytime we had any sort of run. If UK had hit the threes like we normally do, this game would have been nowhere near as close as it was, but that’s nothing profound or unnoticed on here. Ugly game, but pretty W. Go Cats!!!

P.S. What was the exact attendance?

Go Cats and Go Canes!

by KentuckyCane on Jan 2, 2010 8:38 PM EST reply actions  

24,479.... I heard on the post-game

Blue... there is no other color to Bleed !!!

by a2d2 on Jan 2, 2010 8:43 PM EST up reply actions  

New record

This one may stand until we get the Coach Cal, Coal-Tobacco-Corn and Soybeans Arena built

No matter where you're at, there you are

by cincyblue on Jan 2, 2010 9:45 PM EST up reply actions  

HA!

Sadly, that may actually be the name of the new arena : ) Still better than Papa Johns Stadium, I guess.

by blue kentucky girl on Jan 2, 2010 9:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Probably IMG something :-)

Blue... there is no other color to Bleed !!!

by a2d2 on Jan 2, 2010 9:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Cal addressed Wall "taking himself out"

in his post-game comments. Not sure that’s gonna work, as competitive as JW is. I think a couple of short breaks, with forced liquids, each half might help, but I ain’t the coach.

No moral victories--it's all about Ws and Ls!!!

by oldcat'69 on Jan 2, 2010 8:50 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm watching it now

and it happened around the 13 minute mark of the second half. And at 12:05 even Kellogg mentions that he looks like he’s sick or something. This is the second time this year it’s happened. Is he not getting his gatorade or something?

Go Cats and Go Canes!

by KentuckyCane on Jan 2, 2010 8:52 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm betting he's so into the game that even when he's taken out

he doesn’t really “want” a drink. He’s got to learn to force himself to take one, though, for his own good, if that’s what’s causing the cramps.

No moral victories--it's all about Ws and Ls!!!

by oldcat'69 on Jan 2, 2010 8:54 PM EST up reply actions  

forced liquids.

why, oh, why, can’t they keep him hydrated? It doesn’t appear to be that difficult as everyone else seems to be able to do it. Please, hire me, I don’t currently have a job, I would work for free, JUST to ensure that poor John Wall is forced to take his liquids. : )

by BigSkyCat on Jan 2, 2010 8:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Besides that, you'd get to sit next to Big Cuz

when he’s on the bench. You women are sneaky. ;-))

No moral victories--it's all about Ws and Ls!!!

by oldcat'69 on Jan 3, 2010 10:56 AM EST up reply actions  

I saw

nothing excessive by Cousins. Wasn’t that elbow due to trying to get the ball? I wasn’t sure but I didn’t see him try to hurt the player. I wanted to say something about the emotions of this game. I was sitting there just all excited. For years I have seen passion lacking in our guys at times and its very frustrating for this old kentucky girl to witness that. I want them to want it as bad as I do. Today I saw that. I dont care if its messy or not just because of the emotion. That game is what you want to see in a rivalry. Messy and full of emotion. These Kentucky kids get it. I think Cal has preached to these kids what Kentucky is all about. To me that means that he wasn’t just selling us a load of crap when he talks about how much he respects the tradition at Kentucky. He is selling it to his kids too. He completly won me over today. They all won me over today. I was so proud of these guys. I for the first time in years feel like they love UK as much as I do. I think they appreciate Kentukcy as much as I do. That will carry them a long way.

Kentucky bretheren united once again! Thanks Cal!

by tenken on Jan 2, 2010 8:39 PM EST reply actions  

I agree one zillion percent.

Battling for a loose ball is always tense. And I think the refs took that into consideration in their call. Kellogg is on there going “he could be ejected blah blah”. Well when you put a striped shirt on and I see you running around the court, then you can make that call.

And I love Cousins and his ballsy play. Charles Barkley anyone? Sure he could punch someone and take it too far, but I don’t think I’ve seen him get totally out of control yet (IMO)

by uk1982 on Jan 2, 2010 9:34 PM EST up reply actions  

It was definetly excessive and on purpose. That was the beauty of it.

Swopshire kneeed him hard in the face, but that went unnoticed by Kellogg as he remabled on about how cousins should be ejected from the game. Here’s the video link to it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DlNADVcS8g4

There is no way in hell that swopshire’s knee “happened” to strike cousins…when do you use your knee as a means of wrestling for a loose ball? That was blantant, and so cousins did was he always does…react.

Am i the only one who has noticed that cousins ALWAYS reacts, adn never acts? I mean to say, it seems he never truely instigates anything, rather reacts to what is done to him.

by BleedinUKBlue on Jan 2, 2010 11:29 PM EST up reply actions  

His reactions are gonna get the rest of the TEAM in trouble

I saw the knee, but I thin k it was a lot less “intentional” than the elbow. When Cousins reacts it does two things

1-Lets every future team we play know that he is emotional and acts on it (think they might try to egg him on)

2- makes him vulnerable to foul trouble putting the team in a position to pick up the considerable slack left when he is on the bench.

I love Boogie-one of my top ten all time “Modern” freshmen, but he needs to PLAY with emotion, not react with emotion.

by Seabass6152 on Jan 2, 2010 11:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Exactly What Pitino Wanted

This game was rough and physical because Pitino wanted it that way. He knew It was the only way his team had a chance against a far superior team, To quote a UL fan and friend of mine about Pitino when he coached for UK " He likes his teams to foul twice and hope he only gets called for one," I am sure he told his players to anger Cuz. I am a bigger fan of Cousins today watching him stand up for himself and his teammates. Sure I agree he needs to check his emotions but when someone challanges you, you need to let them know you are up for the challange.

I also have to comment on the player (I think it was Delk) coming after Cousins…once he was sure there was someone there to “hold him back”.
Agreed, Cuz needs to understand that teams will push him but his actions do one more thing as well.
3) Tells opponents we will not back down…

by LyricSmith on Jan 3, 2010 11:00 AM EST up reply actions  

agreed....this was a simple game of them trying to remove the players

that would prevent them from winning

Remember, we're having fun now!!!

by ALLBLUCAT on Jan 3, 2010 11:22 AM EST up reply actions  

Good recap, Tru, as usual.

Let me mention a couple of the guys you didn’t talk about:

DeAndre Liggins didn’t impact the stats much at all, but made two plays that illustrated how far he’s come. First was the touch pass to PPat-if that’s not a Top Ten POD, somebody’s asleep. The second was diving to the floor, taking possession of the ball and then calling timeout. Good stuff, and it’s good to see that kid doing well.

-Darnell Dodson didn’t light it up today like he’s capable of doing but he got some rebounds, two of which show his potential, what with that amazing wingspan of his. On the rebounds I’m thinking about, his arm(s) shot out there like a snake striking and took the ball. Depending on who we recruit this year, this kid is gonna have to carry a load next year, and he’s plenty capable of doing it.

Finally, it was butt-ugly, but despite shooting like a sixth-grade team except for dunks and layups, this group of kids found a way to win. There’s a lot to be said for that. Have a good night, everybody.

No moral victories--it's all about Ws and Ls!!!

by oldcat'69 on Jan 2, 2010 8:41 PM EST reply actions  

Not sure how the delete line got in my comment,

but I didn’t mean for it to. Also meant to say that the different angle shot of the Cousins incident puts a little different light on it. He took a knee to the head just before he threw the elbow.

No moral victories--it's all about Ws and Ls!!!

by oldcat'69 on Jan 2, 2010 8:43 PM EST up reply actions  

The Knee

is what kept Cousins in the game. If you eject Cousins for the elbow, you have to eject Swopshire for the knee.

Both of them got heated and you couldn’t really blame one or the other.

by aidanpryde18 on Jan 2, 2010 8:46 PM EST up reply actions  

me too....

the above view looks less ejectionable….

only one rule in my house - uk has to be your favorite college bball team

by memphis wildcat on Jan 2, 2010 9:06 PM EST up reply actions  

they said on KSR--

did you see this bigskycat??—that Sosa called Cousins a “nutcase” after the game. (though not to his face, obviously!) Don’t you love it?! Cousins IS nuts and I LOVE that about him.

by blue kentucky girl on Jan 2, 2010 8:56 PM EST up reply actions  

So let me

get this straight, Cousins is a nutcase, what does that make Sosa? Oh yeah, a LOSER!!

by kywineman on Jan 2, 2010 9:00 PM EST up reply actions  

You have to watch the double -- in the comments.

It works in the main text, but gives you a strikeout in the comments if there is a — on the other side.

In the comments, use a single hyphen and it won’t happen. It took me forever to figure that out.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Jan 3, 2010 10:10 AM EST up reply actions  

Thanks.

No moral victories--it's all about Ws and Ls!!!

by oldcat'69 on Jan 3, 2010 10:57 AM EST up reply actions  

Darnell Dodson

I so agree. He had a off shooting game but did find a ways to help his team. I like this kid.

As close as this game was, if Wall, Dodson and Bledsoe shoot their 3 point average when wide open, this game is a route. They all missed a lot of open looks.

by LyricSmith on Jan 3, 2010 11:04 AM EST up reply actions  

Oh, the Red Ones will

talk plenty about Cousins being a thug. But we will live with that whining and savor the W. The overhead shot of the scrum showed that while it was very physical, it was hardly flagrant. The refs made the best call.

I have a new word for Clark Kellogg, “Jerkability” and he and CBS showed plenty of it today.

I thought this game had the intensity of what we will see in March but we survived and that is all that matters.

by kywineman on Jan 2, 2010 8:43 PM EST reply actions  

Oh

and the Seth Davis and the other cruddy commentator talking about Cousins should have been ejected about threw me off my rocker.

Kentucky bretheren united once again! Thanks Cal!

by tenken on Jan 2, 2010 8:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Agree

I thought the commentators were absolutely horrible today all around. I usually enjoy Kellog but he was just as bad as the others today.

It is not worth an intelligent man’s time to be in the majority. By definition, there are already enough people to do that.

by kentuckygirl0724 on Jan 2, 2010 8:47 PM EST up reply actions  

I was on the road today...

and Sirius only had the Louisville broadcast of the game. The UofL announcers didnt feel that it deserved an ejection…

It's frustrating when you know all the answers, but nobody bothers to ask you the questions.

by floundringaround on Jan 2, 2010 9:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Heh.

Amazing.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Jan 3, 2010 10:11 AM EST up reply actions  

I agree.

So annoying with the whole “OHHH COUSINS COULD BE EJECTED”. I HATE it when commentators turn into talking heads. You’re a commentator, quit pretending to be a ref. Ugh! Annoying.

by uk1982 on Jan 2, 2010 9:37 PM EST up reply actions  

That other guy was Tim Brando

And he’s usually pretty fair, but those halftime comments were over the top. They didn’t see what the refs saw on the floor or on the replays.

by BCinVA on Jan 2, 2010 8:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreeing with BCinVA-normally I like Brando, but he really hacked me off with

his comments primarily because the incident was long over by the time he started popping off.

by bluegrassgal on Jan 3, 2010 11:30 AM EST up reply actions  

Yep.

They have nicknamed him “Thuggins.” Its all good though. Last year they got to listen to gripes about the “wing and a prayer” shot from Sosa and “what if” it hadnt gone in. This year it is Cousins and “what if” he had been ejected. It will always be something. Main point WE WON!! Go Cats!

It is not worth an intelligent man’s time to be in the majority. By definition, there are already enough people to do that.

by kentuckygirl0724 on Jan 2, 2010 8:47 PM EST up reply actions  

who cares what they say?

I whined and was pissed when we lost last year and the year before. It sucks to lose. They’ll get used to it : )

by blue kentucky girl on Jan 2, 2010 8:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Exactly.

It totally sucks to lose this game.

It is not worth an intelligent man’s time to be in the majority. By definition, there are already enough people to do that.

by kentuckygirl0724 on Jan 2, 2010 9:00 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree Tru

about Pitino’s press conference….handled himself with class and as you know, even mentioned Laettner and Timberlake in reference to Cousins. The questioner was obviously trying to start something and didn’t we all just LOVE Brando and Davis EXPERT opinions?
I also thought Cal said all the right things and I think both coaches showed how smart they are.

It was ugly but as both Cal and Pitino said….that’s what you get in rivalry games.

You can't fix "stupid"!

by UKlvrJM on Jan 2, 2010 8:47 PM EST reply actions  

My favorite part was

his last line- “Happy New Year, I know you all are so happy to see me.” Ha!

Go Cats and Go Canes!

by KentuckyCane on Jan 2, 2010 8:48 PM EST up reply actions  

yes, it's in fanposts

No matter where you're at, there you are

by cincyblue on Jan 2, 2010 9:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Could you be more specific?

I’m having trouble locating it in fanposts.

by KYvampyre on Jan 2, 2010 9:36 PM EST up reply actions  

don't know about the fanposts

but courierjournal.com has his and Calipari’s there on the front page

by blue kentucky girl on Jan 2, 2010 9:46 PM EST up reply actions  

i thought i saw it in the fanpost earlier...

but now it is gone…something may be wrong with the site.

only one rule in my house - uk has to be your favorite college bball team

by memphis wildcat on Jan 2, 2010 9:49 PM EST up reply actions  

It is in fanshots......I watched them

Blue... there is no other color to Bleed !!!

by a2d2 on Jan 2, 2010 9:51 PM EST up reply actions  

My fault, here, guys and gals

fanshots.
Here I try to do a something good and it gets screwed up
Grover.

No matter where you're at, there you are

by cincyblue on Jan 2, 2010 9:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Lose your cape? hehehe

Blue... there is no other color to Bleed !!!

by a2d2 on Jan 2, 2010 9:54 PM EST up reply actions  

heh :)

No matter where you're at, there you are

by cincyblue on Jan 2, 2010 9:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks for the help.

I have to say, I was impressed with Pitino’s remarks. Very gracious, very complimentary and surprisingly upbeat.

by KYvampyre on Jan 2, 2010 10:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Cal is the man.

When the reporter asked him post game about how he felt about the technicals, Cal’s response was, “Were they on me? No? Well then I didnt really care.”

As far as Pitino goes, I thought he did ok post game. I, personally, felt that there was some smugness and sarcasm present when discussing the technicals and whatnot. Just my opinion though.

It is not worth an intelligent man’s time to be in the majority. By definition, there are already enough people to do that.

by kentuckygirl0724 on Jan 2, 2010 8:49 PM EST reply actions  

We all probably thought his smugness was cute

when he was at UK. :-)

No moral victories--it's all about Ws and Ls!!!

by oldcat'69 on Jan 2, 2010 8:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Well, its not anymore. ;)

It is not worth an intelligent man’s time to be in the majority. By definition, there are already enough people to do that.

by kentuckygirl0724 on Jan 2, 2010 8:55 PM EST up reply actions  

I believe UL came out to cause trouble

right away and that is what sent Bledsoe off. Cousin’s is an easy target and he has to learn to control those emotions. When he gets to the NBA somebody will deck him. From what I saw, Cousin’s didn’t swing the elbow (he would of been ejected if he had) but pushed it into the player. I have never seen a game start like that and I hope don’t ever again. My heart can’t take it. It would not of surprised me if the refs had sent both teams back to the locker room until they cooled down.
As for the UL fans crying about the game not being fair because Cousins wasn’t ejected, BULL CRAP. Winners want to play the best and beat the best. It really says something about their fans.

by Grasslands1 on Jan 2, 2010 8:51 PM EST reply actions  

I've been thinking the same thing, particularly after that incident

with Bledsoe that started the game. Did anyone hear an explanation for what happened there?

by BCinVA on Jan 2, 2010 8:58 PM EST up reply actions  

That was indeed a wierd start

Cal said the intensity started before tip-off with pregame jawing and even some physical stuff (don’t know the specifics). Something sure as heck happened to cause that crazy first minute. He mentioned “you had to be there” to understand how each team got jacked up.

I agree with you Grasslands, Pitino was up to something. Good for him, it almost worked. Thank goodness for our levelheaded point guard in the second half. He just smiles… and saves this teams ass.

No matter where you're at, there you are

by cincyblue on Jan 2, 2010 9:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes!

It was Pitino’s game plan. His only hope of beating a far superior team. I can’t say as I blame him but I do blame the officiating for allowing that tactic to work.

UL fans should be happy they only lost by 9. If Pitino doesn’t employ this school yard scrum tactic, they lose by 30.

by LyricSmith on Jan 3, 2010 11:12 AM EST up reply actions  

Ditto. I would have tried the same thing in Pitino's place. He's a good coach and knew

that was his only hope. Thankfully, it did not work and the Cats came away with the W.

by bluegrassgal on Jan 3, 2010 11:33 AM EST up reply actions  

I know we complain

a lot about the media portraying the program and the coach in a negative light but the emotion this young team showed might be a result of this. They appear to be taking an “us against the world” attitude and that will drive them to fight harder and perform better as the season progresses.

by kywineman on Jan 2, 2010 8:58 PM EST reply actions  

yeah

Cal-against-the-world is kind of his shtick. Seems to work for him, so I’m all for it. I like the emotionalness of our young guys too. I love our little nutcases!! Better too much fire than not enough. It’s becoming clearer all the time, this is a special year, and I wouldn’t change A THING.

by blue kentucky girl on Jan 2, 2010 9:10 PM EST up reply actions  

I know

Eric Bledsoe getting so emotional was awesome. I loved it!

Kentucky bretheren united once again! Thanks Cal!

by tenken on Jan 2, 2010 9:14 PM EST up reply actions  

especially nice to see in FRESHMEN

I mean, they aren’t from Kentucky (minus Hood, who didn’t play I don’t think), and have never played UL. It is fabulous for a fan to see that ,YES our young ’uns DO know how very, very important this game is…I think this even though it may be true that being too emotional can hurt your chance of winning. Worth the risk to me!

by blue kentucky girl on Jan 2, 2010 9:18 PM EST up reply actions  

that attitude is given to them by Coach Cal, no doubt about it.

And as was said in the post-game, I know that at times the emotions of our young players can get the best of them, but I for one, wouldn’t trade our boys and their young and maybe somewhat over-emotional nature for anything. I appreciate the passion, raw energy and emotion that they give us. This is a once-in-a -lifetime team we have here, folks, and I love every bit of them. Even their crazy, 18-19 year old competitive tendencies.

by BigSkyCat on Jan 2, 2010 9:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Heh, I think it's because it is true

CBS’s coverage stank. We all try to check our prejudices with that stuff but
Kentucky scores and Kellogg talks like he’s at a funeral.
Louisville does something good and Vern’s like he’s at the resurrection.

No matter where you're at, there you are

by cincyblue on Jan 2, 2010 9:34 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah,

and in this instance I happen to agree with you (and Coach Cal) on the coverage. It sucked. On more than one occasion I wished that I could reach through my tv screen and (in the words that are so often used by Coach Cal and DeMarcus) punch them (meaning Kellog and Lundquist) — in the mouth. : )

by BigSkyCat on Jan 2, 2010 9:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Orton..

I still think Orton was undervalued. He really put a stop to Samuel. He knew he was gonna have to fight for every point when Orton was in. I appreciated his effort, and moreso his enthusiasm.

Go Cats!

by JRod1229 on Jan 2, 2010 9:01 PM EST reply actions  

Orton played his role

for the game, gave some fouls to slow down Samuels.

by kywineman on Jan 2, 2010 9:03 PM EST up reply actions  

and i thought some of the fouls were questionable...

only one rule in my house - uk has to be your favorite college bball team

by memphis wildcat on Jan 2, 2010 9:04 PM EST up reply actions  

but i really mean it in the case of orton...

and harris
and wall
and….

:)

only one rule in my house - uk has to be your favorite college bball team

by memphis wildcat on Jan 2, 2010 9:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes

Sosa definitely has gone to the BJ Flynn School Of Flop. He has mastered the throw out your leg until it touches someone and fall backwards move.

by LyricSmith on Jan 3, 2010 11:15 AM EST up reply actions  

I thought the fouls were called way too close on UK, but decided it might have been

so that the refs could try and maintain control on the court what with emotions running so high.

by bluegrassgal on Jan 3, 2010 11:36 AM EST up reply actions  

Yes

some things happened pre-game.
I don’t what they were but a non-foul in the first 2 seconds on Bledsoe, please.
The ref crew (Cal says they were a final four crew) knew all heck was about to break loose.

No matter where you're at, there you are

by cincyblue on Jan 3, 2010 11:42 AM EST up reply actions  

Yes, I watched the game again and Orton

was very strong inside against Samuel. That block early made an impression on UL and made them a little timid. Plus he did force UL to foul quite a bit. He is not Cousins by any means but he is a quality backup for now and is going to be a solid player before he is gone. He really only had one bad sequence when he turned the ball over under our basket and then fouled the guy when they started going down the court. Probably not as bad as Liggins inbounds play with 7 seconds left in the half when he threw the ball to a well covered Wall when Bledsoe was there wide open. Then Bledsoe gets called for a foul than I couldn’t see after watching the re-play 4 times. Those two plays and PP’s missed dunk could of been the difference of quite a few points and a very comfortable win. I am not greedy though and will take this win.

by Grasslands1 on Jan 3, 2010 2:07 AM EST up reply actions  

secdigitalnetwork.com

I havent checked it yet but they have had all the other games from the year

It's frustrating when you know all the answers, but nobody bothers to ask you the questions.

by floundringaround on Jan 2, 2010 9:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Isn't it a pay site?

No matter where you're at, there you are

by cincyblue on Jan 2, 2010 9:37 PM EST up reply actions  

no....it is free

I looked a few minutes ago and they only have highlights right now. The game should be there eventually. I watched a game I had missed the next day, so I am not sure when they post it.

Blue... there is no other color to Bleed !!!

by a2d2 on Jan 2, 2010 9:49 PM EST up reply actions  

I am bit miffed

The so called technical or unsportsmanlike foul called on Cousins was after they looked at the tape. When did it become legal for refs to look at a tape and retroactively call a foul??? They called 2 fouls on UL at the time, but didnt call the one on Cousins untll looking at the tape. So now dont have to be called at the time, but can be called via instant replay. Thats crap. By the way, I thought Cousins was propping himself up using the UL players head, not committing a foul.

by UKTimmy on Jan 2, 2010 9:29 PM EST reply actions  

Cousins was definitely guilty of a technical from what I seen and I

watched that play 20 times. I do not believe he deserved to be ejected though.

by Grasslands1 on Jan 3, 2010 2:10 AM EST up reply actions  

Only allowed to call technicals ex post facto

I think that after incidents they may be considered fighting in which inappropriate behavior may have occurred, officials are allowed to go to replay in order to assess technicals and possible ejections.

by GoLightning on Jan 2, 2010 9:32 PM EST reply actions  

was going to say the same thing...

in the case of a flagerant (sp?) or excessive foul, i beleive the refs have the right to review the tape. this makes sure that its not just the second player (or retaliator) that gets caught but also the instigator….

only one rule in my house - uk has to be your favorite college bball team

by memphis wildcat on Jan 2, 2010 9:44 PM EST up reply actions  

NFL

I am gonna finally say the NFL has it right for once. Part of the fun is that the retaliator gets caught and the instigator doesnt. I also feel that there should never be instant replay for any kind of foul.

by UKTimmy on Jan 2, 2010 9:50 PM EST up reply actions  

From NCAA.org rulebook

Section 13. Games with Replay/Television Equipment
Art 2. Officials may use such available equipment only in the following
situations:
d. Determine if a contact flagrant foul occurred. When it is determined
that a contact flagrant foul did not occur but an intentional personal,
(men) contact dead ball technical foul or (women) a player-substitute
technical foul for dead ball contact did occur, those fouls shall
be penalized accordingly. However, no other infractions may be
penalized.
1. When there is a foul called for contact, the officials, with a
plausible reason, may review the severity of that foul during the
dead ball period following the call. When the ball becomes live,
there shall be no further review of the made call.
2. When the officials fail to observe the foul, the time frame in
2-13.6 shall be used to penalize the infraction.

by GoLightning on Jan 2, 2010 10:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Sorry, I tuned out when you said "NCAA"

Anyone with NCAA in their name shouldn’t be associated with rules …

by ukcris on Jan 2, 2010 10:42 PM EST up reply actions  

disagree...

they should have the right to make sure they get the instigator as well as the retaliator………

only one rule in my house - uk has to be your favorite college bball team

by memphis wildcat on Jan 2, 2010 10:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Its the NCAA

They have a right to do whatever they want and I have a right to disagree.

by UKTimmy on Jan 4, 2010 4:35 PM EST up reply actions  

On the refs...

just talked to my dad and he said in the post game Cal said he thought this team could very well call the NC game – did anyone else hear that?

as bad as we agreed the refs were, my dad said given it might have been good that this crew was calling the game because a “lesser” crew might have ejected cousins rather than taking the time to get it right…or rather than impacting the game more than they were…

only one rule in my house - uk has to be your favorite college bball team

by memphis wildcat on Jan 2, 2010 9:46 PM EST reply actions  

yeah,

you won’t hear me bitching about the refs. The fact that Cousins was in the game and the damage that he was able to do while actually in the game, far outweighs the potential no-calls and other sillyness that the refs may have made.

by BigSkyCat on Jan 2, 2010 9:52 PM EST up reply actions  

That's a good point

My beef was that they called everything so tight at first that it escalated emotions, not get the game under control as I’m sure it was intended. Then there was little consistency on what was a hand check foul and what wasn’t.

I ref a good bit of soccer and have been told to call a game tightly and keep things under control early. But you have to either let up slowly if the game is under control or keep on calling that tightly. USSF training teaches us a lot about game management and game flow. We get reminded that nobody is there to watch us and to let “trifling fouls” go in order to produce a better game with better flow. The inconsistency today helped produce a game with no flow.

That said, I know I couldn’t have done as good as job as they did.

by GoLightning on Jan 2, 2010 10:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Come on, Tru

I love rooting for one of the most honorable, talented and exemplary young men to ever play for our university as much as anyone, but…

Patrick Patterson was terrific. I know you think he didn’t get enough rebounds, but that is more a sign of experience than anything else. Cousins just sucks up every rebound available, and Patrick has learned just to set sail for the opposing goal when a shot is missed.

Patterson played 38 minutes, Cousins 26. That is a minimum of 12 minutes for PPat without Cousins even on the floor. And even that is if the old “Cousins sucks up all the rebounds” argument even works on Coach Cal, which I am betting it doesn’t.

I completely agree that Patterson “is” terrific. He is one of my favorite UK players, ever. But I am not as sure that he “was” terrific this time. Especially in the 2nd half.

To me one of the biggest story lines of the game is how late in the second half, when someone needed to slam the lid on this one, it was the freshmen (Wall, Cousins, Bledsoe) who rose up and got it done. With PPat joining the rest of us in watching the proceedings.

by Sonic on Jan 2, 2010 10:00 PM EST reply actions  

when we went down by 1...

wall started the close out process with 6 points
pp assisted ramon on his 3 and then pp got a 3 point play the old fashion way

in between wall’s 6 and the 6 pp scored or helped with was a perry stevenson layup.

only one rule in my house - uk has to be your favorite college bball team

by memphis wildcat on Jan 2, 2010 10:22 PM EST up reply actions  

You stated yourself that Patterson

played 38 minutes. Wall was worn out as well. Patterson’s legs were gone and the younger more rested players helped carry the day. Cut him some slack.

by kywineman on Jan 2, 2010 10:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Sonic, I always think you have really rational comments,

but PPat is awesome. He is a player that plays hard every game, offensively and defensively. Always fast to get back on the ball. And he is one of my favorite players ever, as I have said before. :-)

Blue... there is no other color to Bleed !!!

by a2d2 on Jan 2, 2010 10:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Not to mention he wasn't given the ball i the 2nd hald. Literaly

Whenever he did, we scored. For some reason, Wall (or Coach Cal) just stopped going to him. It was frusterating.

by BleedinUKBlue on Jan 2, 2010 11:36 PM EST up reply actions  

PP doesn't get as many rebounds as he did earlier

in the year because he is playing outside a lot more. The advancement of the rest of the team has aloud that to happen.

by Grasslands1 on Jan 3, 2010 2:22 AM EST up reply actions  

you got it...

Steelers fan 1st! UK is my 2nd love.

by vinceuk1 on Jan 3, 2010 9:21 AM EST up reply actions  

I watched PP pretty close today and thought he played well.

He was excellent on defense, and is a complete team player. The Cards tried to push the young players over the edge and it did not work. For an intense rivalry game the officiating seemed balanced with both sides getting a couple of calls and not getting some just like every other game we will play with this much intensity. My only complaint is the UL players and the media trying to put the thug image on us without real justification. UL had a plan to try to rattle us that did not work, but will possibly effect the calls in March.

by rodoc on Jan 2, 2010 10:22 PM EST reply actions  

Ok, I'll ask

Is 40-0 a realistic goal? I think the SEC stinks this year – I’m not sure there’s a single game we shouldn’t win. Will we? Probably not. But I think it’s feasible.

It's time. . .

by NYCCats on Jan 2, 2010 11:02 PM EST reply actions  

This team

has the components to pull off such a streak but so many things happen in game situations. They couldn’t buy a 3 pt shot in this game, Cousins came close to getting ejected, Wall came up gimpy again for awhile. This team shows an awesome ability to fight through adversity and come up with a win but the odds do not favor an undefeated season. I just want them to end the season with at least 6 straight wins.

by kywineman on Jan 2, 2010 11:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Tennessee is certainly a very good team, at least they were until yesterday.

If UT players come back and they play defense they will be very hard to beat twice. When we play Florida and we don’t guard the perimeter, they could light us up. Ole Miss. and Mss. St. could give us good games. Vanderbilt was suppose to be better than they are. Always hard to win on the road. But yes, 40-0 should always be our goal and this year it is more realistic than we anticipated. The problem is in the NCAA tournament, one bad game and you can be done.

by Grasslands1 on Jan 3, 2010 2:29 AM EST up reply actions  

hey! That's what I been talking about!!

I been saying there is a real possibility that this team goes undefeated, for about the last six or eight games now. I guess since the IU win. I thought UL was the most dangerous team on the schedule. I ain’t old enough, and I’m 47, to remember a season that I didn’t think " oh well, they were gonna lose one sooner or later", after they lost their first game. If this team loses, I’ll be genuinely surprised. I will think, “oh man”, if they had n’t lost that one game"! One more thing, this team will be really good by the end of the season, when they know what they’re doing!!!

When a great nation falls, it falls from within. There is only two ways to do this. One must "take" power by force, or when the other side simply "gives" it to them. me

by blubloodcatfan on Jan 2, 2010 11:28 PM EST reply actions  

Well,

I guess it’s only fair that I come here and take my lumps…

A few unsolicited opinions:

-Laetner and Cousins should have both been ejected. However, Laetner’s ejection would have guaranteed a win for ‘92 UK. I can’t say ‘10 UofL would have won even if Cousins had gotten the boot. I don’t like Cousins, but I’ll never have to see him again. He’s NBA bound.

-We have Samardo for another year or two, because he isn’t ready for the NBA. Or major college basketball, it seems. It’s going to be a long year in the Big East.

-I didn’t listen to Pitino’s press conference. He needs to shut up and get us some better players. Kidding, sort of.

by don'tshootmei'macard on Jan 2, 2010 11:54 PM EST reply actions  

How could you not like Cuz...???

He needs to get his emotions in check for sure, but he’s a very likable kid… IMO

Steelers fan 1st! UK is my 2nd love.

by vinceuk1 on Jan 3, 2010 12:02 AM EST up reply actions  

Those red colored

glasses you are wearing must be fogged up. If you look at all of the camera angles the one from above does not show anything resembling a flagrant foul. The refs looked at them all and made the call. The game got back under control and you had your chance to win. If you can’t beat us with Cousins you don’t deserve the win without him.

by kywineman on Jan 3, 2010 12:06 AM EST up reply actions  

Listen

Cousins SHOULD NOT have been ejected. It was NOT that bad. Did the guy leave the game hurt? Did he bend over in pain even? NOT THAT BIG OF A DEAL! I would say that if it was reversed.

Kentucky bretheren united once again! Thanks Cal!

by tenken on Jan 3, 2010 12:18 AM EST up reply actions  

No problem

Your’s is a welcome opinion, in my opinion. Much more then a certain hozerlips. As for the man-child Cousins, check the tape on that one. He took a knee to the head, possibly the face, from Swopshire no less, just before the forearm. It’s a bang-bang. The call was right. No ejections necessary, unless you toss Swopshire. His knee looked intentional, but it’s quick. Hard to tell for sure. Cooler heads prevail, and they did. Cuz isn’t a punk, he’s truly the “12 – year old” that C-Cal refered to earlier this year. But, man he’s a beast on the boards! Pitino was very good on the presser. I’m not much of a fan of his anymore, and I was impressed. Oh, Cuz isn’t a lock for the NBA, yet.

When a great nation falls, it falls from within. There is only two ways to do this. One must "take" power by force, or when the other side simply "gives" it to them. me

by blubloodcatfan on Jan 3, 2010 12:18 AM EST up reply actions  

Disagree about Cousins should have been ejected.

If he would have swung the elbow yes, but watch the replay, and I mean watch it, he pushes the elbow into the player. That is why he was not ejected. Cousins could use another year just to mature, so I am not 100% sure he will go pro after this year. The NBA will chew him up with his sensitivity at this point.

You guys would be totally screwed without Samuel’s by the way. If I was him and I read the crap you finicky Card fans say about him, I would transfer the heck out of there. Be careful what you ask for. It is rare for a big man to come out of high school and dominate right away. He is not even half into his Sophmore season. He faced a very strong front line today in UK. Not to many teams have a Patterson and Cousins.

By the way, I visited the Card Chronicle for the first time and read the game thread. I am certainly no saint and have been known to throw a few cuss words around, but they need to clean that bull crap up. And the way they talk about heir own players is terrible. In my opinion it makes Cardinal fans look like they have no class at all. Their jealousy of UK was beyond a joke. I know the site is not a reflection on you, but my god, somebody needs to have a good talking to those people.

by Grasslands1 on Jan 3, 2010 2:51 AM EST up reply actions  

Totally agree Grasslands-

I visited their site after the game. WILL NOT go back. Completely classless…

"You are what you are and you ain't what you ain't"

by iam4ukintn on Jan 3, 2010 4:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Different strokes....

I am sure those at CC don’t mind having UK fans NOT read their site. They like to go after me as well when I post on there. I don’t have a problem with the language, but I was also a Marine. For those who do, beware. It isn’t for the church choir crowd.

One thing I will say about the language usage and the fans at CC. I find the CC crowd to be younger and far less analytical about the game. They don’t go into full on excel sheet nerdfest like Tru does ( I say that with total respect and love for the spreadsheet’s Tru), But they are passionate and intense in their love for all things Red and Birdy.

I love that they are a different type of fan. One thing all Kentuckians have in common is love for the roundball even if we don’t all root for the same team (though I can’t figure out why anyone wouldn’t love the Big Blue)

UL fans are younger and less “scholarly” about the game, but just as emotional as UK fans. the language I see used on that sight reflects that. It’s not better or worse, just different. I for one, am glad CC is around, though I definitely prefer ASOB any day of the week

by Seabass6152 on Jan 3, 2010 8:49 PM EST up reply actions  

To futher comment on Cuz

I really fell in love with this kid today. As much crap as some people are giving him even our own fans, he did very well of keeping his composure. He was being banged around all game and UofL was doing their best to rile him up. I told a friend I am afraid like Shaq some are trying to hurt the guy and that is exactly what the Cards were doing and doing it to Wall too. Card fans you want to try to start throwing mud?? You need to watch the game again…….the Cards played rough and hard and dirty in opionion. Back off Cuz!

Kentucky bretheren united once again! Thanks Cal!

by tenken on Jan 3, 2010 12:25 AM EST reply actions  

He always gets beat up and banged around...

..But that’s not good press is it…

I love big Cuz and his heart..!!

Steelers fan 1st! UK is my 2nd love.

by vinceuk1 on Jan 3, 2010 12:27 AM EST up reply actions  

Right On

I have no problem with a team playing physical, but they were playing a little over the edge, dirty is a good description and after the game saying (Sosa anyways) it was the Cats. However, I still dig Pitino and thought he represented his team well.

by rodoc on Jan 3, 2010 9:55 AM EST up reply actions  

What

is the most wins Kentucky has had starting a season without a loss?

Kentucky bretheren united once again! Thanks Cal!

by tenken on Jan 3, 2010 12:30 AM EST reply actions  

25-0

Steelers fan 1st! UK is my 2nd love.

by vinceuk1 on Jan 3, 2010 12:34 AM EST up reply actions  

you talking Rupp there?

one of his teams went 25-0 for the year. We might end up 40-0 upin him.

When a great nation falls, it falls from within. There is only two ways to do this. One must "take" power by force, or when the other side simply "gives" it to them. me

by blubloodcatfan on Jan 3, 2010 12:37 AM EST reply actions  

Man,

I wish it were 9:37 here! This preacher needs his beauty sleep. Good night all. Yes, even good night John boy.

When a great nation falls, it falls from within. There is only two ways to do this. One must "take" power by force, or when the other side simply "gives" it to them. me

by blubloodcatfan on Jan 3, 2010 12:41 AM EST reply actions  

UK undefeated through non-conference play!!!!

That is the story of the day! Been a minute since a UK team has done that. Congratulations team. Keep up the good work. One hurdle overcome, now it’s time to prepare for the next one…SEC play baby! “Us against them” will go a long way on the road and the road beckons like a siren at sea.

GO BIG BLUE!!!!

I have kleptomania,
but when it gets bad,
I take something for it.

by bluecrip on Jan 3, 2010 1:24 AM EST reply actions  

it was 1978 the last time UK went through

the pre conference undefeated. That turned out be a very, very good year.

by Grasslands1 on Jan 3, 2010 2:53 AM EST up reply actions  

Vintage....:)

I have kleptomania,
but when it gets bad,
I take something for it.

by bluecrip on Jan 3, 2010 3:54 AM EST up reply actions  

SEC Play ..

The rest of the SEC seems to be self destructing … watched a good UT/Memphis game only to find 4 UT starters in trouble for guns/drugs (could someone please explain to me how these young men could even consider risking their college careers with guns/drugs?? …. for crying out loud!!!)

South Carolina lost Dominique Archie for the season (knee injury) and now have dismissed Mike Holmes from the team ….

Florida seems to be in turmoil losing 3 straight now first Syracuse (understandable) but then Richmond and South Alabama …

by ukcris on Jan 3, 2010 1:37 AM EST reply actions  

Okay listen

as a college student and generally just a younger person these days- marijuana is NOT that big of a deal a no one will ever convince me otherwise. However, I, on the same token, do NOT understand how a concealed weapon with an ALTERED serial number is not a felony. That law should certainly be changed. I don’t know how UT’s team rules work, but honestly, they were just misdemeanor offenses and hopefully will be able to play soon- for their sake of course, not UK’s haha.

Go Cats and Go Canes!

by KentuckyCane on Jan 3, 2010 5:31 AM EST up reply actions  

Pot might not be a big deal to you..

But as a college student, your scholly isn’t riding on your ability to stay clean and sober.

by Seabass6152 on Jan 3, 2010 10:54 AM EST up reply actions  

15-0

25 to go.

Cal’s dream continues.

by FortyYearCatFan on Jan 3, 2010 7:49 AM EST reply actions  

Well...

I can think of a lot of people who share that dream. I know I do!

by mess038 on Jan 3, 2010 9:09 AM EST up reply actions  

15-0 and 25 to go

in one of Cal’s interviews (pregame i think)…he spoke of “creating something special here”…why not???…GO BIG BLUE!!!

"Get your facts first, then you can distort them as much as you please."...Mark Twain.

by KYCatwoman on Jan 3, 2010 11:29 AM EST up reply actions  

It is a big deal....

when you are a college athlete at a major university. Their actions show a lack of respect for their coach and their teamates. Depending on the length of time they miss, it could cost their team a spot in the NCAA tournament. It brought negative publicity that could hurt recruiting. It has their coach and athletic director under fire from fans and the administration. Accepting scholarships also meant accepting the responsibilities that went with them.

by jpbluekat on Jan 3, 2010 9:17 AM EST reply actions  

agree w/jpbluekat

“accepting the responsibilities” are the key words here…i will refrain from my soapbox of this being the problem our country faces, and will stick to UT…sorry those kids chose to NOT be serious with the path of their life…they have first disrespected themselves, then it carries on to the team, coach, school and conference…good for UK…but sad for all others involved…

"Get your facts first, then you can distort them as much as you please."...Mark Twain.

by KYCatwoman on Jan 3, 2010 11:25 AM EST up reply actions  

Reflecting on yesterday

A couple things that stand out to me about the game yesterday are:
1- I was disappointed on our zone offense. Not much movement or penetration. Coach did say in his comments that UL’s zone moves laterally, and not sagging to the middle. Why hadn’t they worked on that if this is what was expected? SEC teams will make note of this. And we better find some zone offense soon.
2- Free throw shooting again a problem. Cousins really blows hot and cold on this, so it has to be concentration. Now PPat is failing at his attempts. Wall had some misses, but I’d put Bledsoe there anytime. When you look at him on the line you can see the confidence in his eyes that he will make them. This aspect of the game will either win or lose several games before the season is over, so it is important to correct.

by UK1972 on Jan 3, 2010 11:11 AM EST reply actions  

I think you can credit the high emotional state of everyone for the lousy free throw shooting

it threw off more than one aspect of the Cats’ game.

Pitino knew he could do it, and he tried to exploit it.
Refs were fair at best in their calls……I hate feeling like someone had money on a game from looking at the game itself. I know we are supposed to be above it all, but that game should not have even been close. And if it isnt an all-out brawl it isnt.

Remember, we're having fun now!!!

by ALLBLUCAT on Jan 3, 2010 11:26 AM EST up reply actions  

Boy,

I hope Coach Cal is reading all of this and taking notes. That’s KY for you, 3 million coaches.

by kywineman on Jan 3, 2010 1:57 PM EST up reply actions  

UK1972, you hit the nails on the head.

The free throws are are both surprising and disgusting, particularly in the case of Patterson, who shot them well last year. We simply cannot have a repeat of Cal’s NC defeat at Memphis because of missed free throws. We cannot!!

As to beating the zone, I was always taught that there were three keys to doing that:

-In/out ball movement, causing the zone to compress and expand, creating shots for both the inside and outside players if the ball is moved fast enough. As much as I love Cuz, we don’t have much of that type of flow when he gets the ball. It’s something he will have to learn because other teams, seeing what happened yesterday, will play a lot of zones on us until we are able to regain our shooting touch, which leads to

-Good outside shooting. Goes without saying, I guess, that we didn’t have that one yesterday. Part of it was just cold shooting and part was because our perimeter shooters were doing some watching and not getting themselves into good position to receive the pass and shoot. And finally,

-Perimeter players forcing two defensive players to react to them at the same time. Usually, that means the point guard moving the ball between the two front zoners, forcing them (and possibly the middle back post player) to compress toward the free throw line, leaving a shooter either on the baseline or, more likely an elbow, open for the pass/shot. Didn’t see much of that yesterday, either. Our guards tend to either move away from the perimeter double-team or try to drive straight through it. If that ain’t working for you, you’ve encourage them to double-team you to make passing opportunities.

Why do good teams like UK not perform some of these simple things? My own opinion is that because their individual talents are so good, they rely on those skills and think only one step or so ahead, while the lesser athlete has to see/plan two or three steps ahead to improve team, not individual, play. That’s when picks off the ball and good in-out flow cause open shots.

No moral victories--it's all about Ws and Ls!!!

by oldcat'69 on Jan 3, 2010 11:30 AM EST reply actions  

sounds about right to me

Camp Cal has one more week to get it right. As of now I think it will be difficult to see this team “unleashed”. as coach likes to do.

by UK1972 on Jan 3, 2010 11:39 AM EST up reply actions  

Ramon Harris

Enough with the Ramon Harris love! One timely three pointer and four TOs do not a great game make. Unless, of course, you are willing to give other players the same game after game praise. As to his remarkable defense, I’ve seen him beaten off the dribble more times than I can recount. I will give him kudos for hustle and scrappiness, but lots of players give that; Liggins in the Louisville game, for example.

by Big Blue Daddy on Jan 3, 2010 10:56 PM EST reply actions  

Hard to fault

effort and hustle. He may not always get the results we want but it will not be because he didn’t give it everything he had. Coach Cal would not use him so much if he wasn’t impressed by his play. I will trust his assessment over yours.

by kywineman on Jan 3, 2010 11:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Again

Calipari likes him.

You don’t.

I trust Cal.

by FortyYearCatFan on Jan 4, 2010 6:39 AM EST up reply actions  

Agree...

that Harris and Patterson bring the influence experience has to the floor. You can’t continually put all underclassmen on the floor at the same time, especially on the road in the SEC.

by UK1972 on Jan 4, 2010 7:33 AM EST up reply actions  

Agreed

Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."

by chirop1 on Jan 4, 2010 9:48 AM EST up reply actions  

Calipari disagrees with you.

So do I. If you come to this blog, you will see love for the players that play hard and well, and Ramon Harris has done that all year.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Jan 4, 2010 8:17 AM EST up reply actions  

Harris may turn out to be the heart and soul of this team before its over......

no knock against any of the other guys, I love them all down to a man. But Harris is just so good at that “blue collar effort”. Never does anything but hustle. He has more than earned his scholarship.

Remember, we're having fun now!!!

by ALLBLUCAT on Jan 4, 2010 8:27 AM EST up reply actions  

Haha.

Dang, I just love that pic. It makes me smile every time. :-)

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Jan 4, 2010 10:51 AM EST up reply actions  

which is

exactly why I said that once this team figures out what in the world they are doing they are going to be nearly impossible to beat. As long as JWall is on the court that is. The team has a true “will” to win, Wall is off the charts in that respect. Cousins truly does have miles to go in the team department. But he is terriffic in spite of his faults. When, not if, this team gets in sync, oh my goodness!!!! The FT shooting drives me nuts. I can take 10 year olds and in a few weeks have them shooting 70%, no problem. It’s 90% form and technique?!!!! The “routine” is the other 10%, and that comes from “practice, practice, practice”. Repitition is honestly a great teacher. Hey, I’d even work cheap. Go Cats.

When a great nation falls, it falls from within. There is only two ways to do this. One must "take" power by force, or when the other side simply "gives" it to them. me

by blubloodcatfan on Jan 3, 2010 11:04 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

An exciting community-driven SBNation blog, by and for fans of the Kentucky Wildcats.

Community Guidelines
[UPDATED 01/18/2012]

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Louisvillelove_small
A death in the UK family

Recent FanPosts

323_small
UK Basketball: Kentucky Is In The Zone, Defense That Is
Emberlogo_sized_small
Anticipation Open Thread
Mostdiggity_small
Somethin' Strange: Zone-Busters or Carolina Fail?
Small
GOG 2011-12 #15: Vanderbilt
Small
DDMO A Figment Of Imagination?
Small
Derek Willis Interview with FOH
Small
Great article on Cats
323_small
Tempering Great Expectations: Do We Need Coaching From Calipari?
Small
Frustrated Fan!!
304labjbkcsj8uopp4ej_small
Just want to share what Hoosier fans seem to think of The Big Blue Nation

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Twitter Widget -- Follow me!


Managing Editor

Tru_small Glenn Logan

Editor

Wildcat_small BigSkyCat

Fl_family_photo_small Ken Howlett

Author

Small JLeverenz

Justified-olyphant_small jc25

Bluepaws_small a2d2

Img_0019_small Alex Scutchfield