Alabama is Powerful, Florida is Scary, and Kentucky is a Basketball School
I think Kentucky fans, mostly made up of part-time and half-hearted football fans, often fail to recognize the difference between good teams. We look at stats, we look at Sports Center, we read all kinds of stuff on the Internet that tells us this player is great and that player is overrated.
When it comes to basketball, a UK fan can tell you that there is a huge difference between a Perry Stevenson and a DeMarcus Cousins, even without knowing the star rating. UK fans can often tell other schools more about their basketball teams than their own fans can. There is a reason for this. UK is a basketball school. The vast majority of UK fans like football, but they love basketball. That's why the football discussion on Kentucky fan sites can sometimes be a little hyperbolic or even occasionally incoherent. It usually boils down to criticizing the coaching and the quarterback, or the punter, or whoever was the major proximate cause of the catastrophic play that cost us the game.
So assuming this is so, le me explain the premise of my comments here. Alabama is a powerful, extremely talented football team, but particularly when seen through the lens of a mediocre football team like Kentucky, Florida is a horror.
The reason for that is really, really simple. -- Tim Tebow. Tim Tebow is a complete athletic freak. In all my years I have never seen an athlete as powerful, large and focused playing quarterback. You occasionally see athletic freaks in football -- Bo Jackson and Javon Kearse come immediately to mind, but there have been others. Tim Tebow is such a one, and may surpass all the others. He is like Ken Stabler in the body of Javon Kearse with the disposition of Reggie White, a quarterback with remarkable, unprecedented size and strength with a supple and highly intelligent mind. He is among the more passionate and powerful team leaders I can ever recall in college football. In short, he is one of a kind. Superman, if you will.
Consider his ballhandling on Saturday. Florida runs, with Tebow, a kind of hybrid spread/triple option/single wing God-awful offense with blazingly fast and elusive athletes, of which Tebow is one. I could never tell on half the option plays who had the football until the play was over, which is exactly how the option is supposed to be run. It was otherworldly, and I can't see how any team can consistently stop an offense with that much speed with a weapon like Tebow running it. Tennessee somehow managed to slow him down a little, but apparently Monty Kiffin is not sharing the secret of that with the rest of us, because Kentucky could not do anything with them until they took their foot off the gas.
Florida's offense is scary not just because of how deceptive it is -- teams have been running variations on the triple option for years -- but because of the speed and size of the athletes behind it. With a healthy Tebow, I don't see how anyone can outscore Florida. But without Tebow, Florida becomes just another very good football team, because all these ungodly schemes simply do not work the same way without him. True, Tebow's backup, John Brantley, has had far fewer snaps and you wouldn't consider him to be as polished as Tebow was at running the offense, even though he's highly skilled and arguably a much better pure passer. But Brantley, no matter how skilled, lacks an entire dimension that Tebow brings in spades -- Earl Campbell-like power.
Defensively, the Gators are very good, but their defense is nothing like their offense. What makes their defense as threatening as it is is that the Gators almost always get out to a quick lead, and allow the defense to take some chances on passing downs, bringing lots of blitzes and forcing penalties, hurries, and sacks. If you can run the football, you can move it on the Gators, but you can't get behind the chains or the will come for you, and their speed off the edges is formidable.
Now consider the Crimson Tide.
Alabama has many weapons -- a strong-armed quarterback in Greg McElroy, a big-play receiver in Julio Jones, a wonderful combination of speed and power in the backfield with Mark Ingram, Roy Upchurch and super-frosh Trent Richardson. They were able to victimize the Arkansas Razorbacks' weak defensive line and crush the Hogs in Tuscaloosa.
Alabama is scary, but in a conventional, bigger-than-you kind of way, not in an alien creature kind of way like Florida. Their offense is completely conventional, normal, and solid. They don't try to beat you with tricks, or ballhandling, or gimmicks (even though they did run a clever flea flicker out of the wildcat formation that got them a 50-yard strike to a wide-open Julio Jones). Alabama beats you the old-fashioned way -- with power, precision, superior athletes and great coaching. They are a no-nonsense, SEC power football team in the mold of all the great SEC football teams that came before them with the notable exception of Tebow-led Florida.
Then, there is the Alabama defense. Simply put, it is indomitable, with the giant 2-gap-playing Terrance Cody leading the charge. There is no better defensive team in the nation, if any are as good. But again, Alabama doesn't use tricky gimmicks, or weird stuff. They stunt like all teams, and they run some special plays, but basically they just physically whip your butt and tackle your team, whoever has the ball. No fluff. No gimmicks. No nonsense, just plain old-fashioned, kick-your-butt-like-you-talked-about-my-momma defense. Not vanilla, but not innovative, either.
Alabama is familiar-scary because they come straight at you and beat you mano-a-mano, and Kentucky can compete with that better than they can with the unearthly Florida offense. Kentucky is not likely to beat Alabama at their own game, but that is the difference between the Tide and the Gators -- Alabama plays football, and the Gators play Tim Tebow's Space Alien game. Tim Tebow's game is horrible, kind of like the alien in Predator. All their stuff is so well camouflaged as to be invisible, and then they turn that laser-gizmo on Tebows's left side and his huge, fast, powerful body against you to blast you into 31-0 first-quarter holes so the defense can tee off on you every play. Tricky. Subtle. Alien. As deceptive as it is powerful.
Alabama is more like Godzilla. There is nothing subtle about Godzilla. He's just a big, bad, fire-breathing lizard that's gonna crush your city, eat your people, and breathe fire on all your defenses. He isn't hiding behind anything, doesn't have any shields or advanced technology or tricky gizmos. Godzilla just dares you to drag your carcass up there and do something about his plans to eat your grandma. Not subtle. Not tricky. Not weird or otherworldly. Just a big, strong, mean-ass monster reptile with a bad attitude and napalm halitosis. Something humans can relate to and appreciate even as he rips your world apart.
"So what you're saying is that we have a better chance against Godzilla than the Predator alien," you ask?
Apparently.
1 recs |
210 comments
|
Comments
I really liked your analysis here
But how does UK being a basketball school fit in?
by ukbulldog on Sep 28, 2009 7:53 PM EDT via mobile reply actions 0 recs
Tebow
Tebow didnt have anything to do with our offense coming out and grabbing our ankles 4 the first quarter,He is awesome though,Kentucky will never beat Fla til they get thismental block out of the way,hell we cant even beat south carolina,for all the good Brooks and co. have done and they have done alot weve got to get over this B.S. that we cant play with these teams,arent we tired of saying wait till BBall season i know i am
by onemaco on Sep 28, 2009 8:12 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
So
It seems that is going to be the ‘company line’.
We had a pretty good basketball program through out the years no matter who ever the athletic director has been.
So why not go get an business school dean to lead the athletic department? With the money coming in from the TV and other contracts the SEC have developed it would make more sense.
OH, I forgot Barnhart announced his goal of 15 championships in seven years on December 9th, 2008. To date we have one, a conference championship in the Great American Rifle Conference. Six years and two months to go so watch out, there’s going to be a bundle of them coming in soon. Cal better win at least the conference and the conference tournament every year.
But what does that lead us back to. We’re still a basketball school.
We are wealthy as an athletic program. Not many schools could go out and pay 4 million for a basketball coach knowing they may be out another 6 million for a “didn’t fit”.
The majority wouldn’t have it any other way.
by ParisGuy on Sep 28, 2009 8:15 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I dont buy it Tru and I will tell you why.
This has been our response to football problems for the last 50 years. We are a superior basketball program, and that should be nothing more to this problem than part of the solution.
The University of Kentucky is a 7-Time National Championship program. We have athletic facilities that most schools would die for. We have athletic boosters that love this University. Do our fans love basketball….more than life itself. Would our fans love basketball if we were NOT a 7-Time National Champ Not even for a New York Minute.
Success breeds fans…..ask the Dallas Cowboys….ask the Boston Celtics….LA Lakers…..New York Yankees….the incredible fanbases those teams have come from their decades of success. Those are pro teams you say…..not college….so we can throw out Ohio State…..Duke….USC (the one out there in California)….Florida( true it has only been 10 years, but that is a MAJOR start)….Success in anything will bring fan support and ultimately financial support.
We don’t get the 4 & 5 star athletes….Just who’s fault is that …..Well, if we had more success, then we would get them…..How do we get them????……ask Les Miles…..and Nick Saban……ask John Calipari…..ask Pete Carroll…..
The point to all of this is, the time for excuses is long gone….that ship has sailed….
The definition of stupidity is doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different result……The definition of Gross Stupidity is expecting to be rewarded for it.
It is time we met these problems head on…..if Coach Brooks can solve them, fine. He certainly has exceeded expectations to this point for at least the past three years. can he get us to the next level? That remains to be seen, but if not, then we move on. If Joker Phillips is the answer, he sure as all that’s holy didnt show it Saturday, but it is florida, so he gets a what, three time pass?…..how many years has it been now since we could compete with these guys?
We make excuse after excuse in support of our programs when they don’t perform. But let’s be honest here….using your own analogy, would we tolerate this kind of performance from our basketball program? Not just no, but…..hell no……because we have higher expectations. We DEMAND that the basketball program perform. Let’s stop finding ways to placate ourselves about who we can beat and who we cant, and let’s start finding ways to get this program to the next level…..do we want perfection?….well an honest answer is yes, because if we don’t want to win, then why bother suiting up?….
I mean, c’mon, if we dont want to win at the SEC level, then let’s just not field a team, we can forget about having to recruit football players and throw all our money at the basketball program, period. No excuses. We can pull out of the SEC, become an independent in basketball and play whomever we like.
I am tired of the excuses….the analogies…..the “let’s be patient” approaches….the “if we only had” seasons……..it is time to either step up, or step down.
This is not about what happened Saturday with one glaring exception……Anyone can beat anyone on any given Saturday…..but they have to show up to do it…….and we didnt even show up. You want mediocrity???…..fine go see a 1-star chick flick with an aging, but lovable guy playing the lead……I want a Woody Hayes/Bear Bryant/Bobby Bowden hybrid walking the sidelines, coaching Wolverine/The Hulk/Buford Pusser as he pounds on the competition…..he won’t ALWAYS win….but he will make me never want to miss a game…..
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on Sep 28, 2009 9:50 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I really ...
… don’t believe this has much to do with my remarks. You must have been reading something else. :-)
I am tired of the excuses….the analogies…..the "let’s be patient" approaches….the "if we only had" seasons……..it is time to either step up, or step down.
Hah. Unintentionally hilarious. Really, sir, you do occasionally need to look at reality. I know it hurts, but just peek a little, once in a while.
It’s good for the soul. :-)
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 28, 2009 9:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
well, I guess the comment was pointed more towards the whole situation than just your remarks
The “Kentucky is a Basketball School” is more in tune to what I was referring to. As far as reality goes, reality is a perception. If a group of people envision a certain situation to be a reality, then that goes a long way towards making that situation truly a reality. I know all of the money arguments and history arguments and such. And as I know this is not a political blog, I will only make an offhanded reference to the fact that our current Presidential situation would have been considered fantasy as little as say 40 years ago?
My point is simply this……things are never going to change unless people demand it. Success is a choice, to quote one of our former head coaches, and we have the tools, we have better tools than we have ever had. To simply write those tools off and say that we are not the kind of school for success to take root is, well, something you shovel out of a barn, IMHO. MY soul is fine….and so is my heart…..and so is my vision…..fortunately, I believe that we have some people in place now at UK who believe the same things I do.
I simply have to keep hoping that will be enough.
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on Sep 29, 2009 8:27 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Demanding it doesn't matter.
It doesn’t. This is a Gordian knot, and UK doesn’t have the knife to cut through it.
If you combine Matt Jones’ excellent post of last night with my comments of two years ago, and look at it honestly and without bias, you would see that there is really nothing that can be done in the near term, and probably ever. There is not enough money in the world, or a coach good enough, anywhere, to create a national power at UK.
It is like asking Belize to find a way to join the G-8. Some things, while theoretically possible under the rubric of “nothing is impossible,” are just so unlikely as to be the functional equivalent.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 8:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
All I can say to that is
you wouldnt have lasted long at Boise State with that approach. Those people decided to do something and did it…..I read both sets of comments and found them both to very very analytical and a truly honest evaluation of the program. As it stands now.
The reason that the situation has never changed is that no one has stepped up to the plate with 5 or 10 million and said “I want a football program”. That Gordian knot you speak of is tied around a bundle of cash that keeps things the way they are. By the way, you did notice that in the last week, the G-8 is being expanded to the G-20 to get more of the world involved in dealing with the problems the G-8 normally takes on??
It all starts with one pebble….one ripple in the water……..you gotta have faith…..and the honest fact is that performances like Saturday’s kill the faith and hope of some, but not all thank God.
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on Sep 29, 2009 8:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Heh.
you wouldnt have lasted long at Boise State with that approach. Those people decided to do something and did it…..I read both sets of comments and found them both to very very analytical and a truly honest evaluation of the program. As it stands now.
The WAC vs. the SEC. No difference, right?
With all due respect, and God knows I totally appreciate your “can do” attitude more than you know, you need to read the links I posted above thoroughly. It isn’t just the structural problem Kentucky has with recruiting great players. That is one very important component of the problem.
But the even larger mountain is the mountain of the SEC. Boise State plays in one of the weakest Division I conferences in America, even weaker than the Big East. How weak? Here is their remaining schedule:
UC Davis
Tulsa
Hawaii
San Jose State
Louisiana Tech
Idaho
Utah State
Nevada
New Mexico State
Boise State has beaten exactly one school that may find it’s way into a major bowl this year. May. And they will likely go undefeated, but do you think that would happen if they had to play Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Auburn, Tennessee, or South Carolina every year?
Seriously, dude. You have to at least have a nodding relationship with reality here.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 8:47 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So your advice is to tuck tail and run?
And they will likely go undefeated, but do you think that would happen if they had to play Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Auburn, Tennessee, or South Carolina every year?
You shouldnt’ be afraid to play good teams.
First time I shot her, shot her in the side.
Hard to watch her suffer, but with the second shot she died...
by btcoop71 on Sep 29, 2009 8:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No.
My advice is simply to look at the world the way it is, and not as we want it to be. That’s all.
We should be proud to be playing in the SEC. Even if it is a prohibitive long shot, being in this conference gives us a chance to field a football team that could play for the BCS championship. If we fail, we have only ourselves to blame, not the BCS committee.
Boise State, in all probability, will never get that chance. How frustrating must it be to go undefeated, and still never be considered for the BCS championship? Their price for playing in a weak conference is a very high one.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 8:59 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We will have to agree to disagree on this
My advice is simply to look at the world the way it is, and not as we want it to be. That’s all.
I guess I’m just too optimistic, and do not accept the “it is what it is” argument. The social change of the 50s and 60s would have never happened if people just threw their hands up and said it is what it is.
Obviously, I’m not comparing UK football to the civil rights movement, just using an analogy.
First time I shot her, shot her in the side.
Hard to watch her suffer, but with the second shot she died...
by btcoop71 on Sep 29, 2009 9:04 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Okay.
That’s fine. But that doesn’t change the facts.
Hope is always a wonderful thing, and never saying die is also uplifting and wonderful. Nobody is required to look at the world and say, “this is impossible.”
And it isn’t impossible. It’s just really, really unlikely. That’s all I’m saying.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 9:06 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tell that to the University of Cincinnati
They went from bottom feeders in C-USA to a powerhouse in the Big East is less than 10 years.
First time I shot her, shot her in the side.
Hard to watch her suffer, but with the second shot she died...
by btcoop71 on Sep 29, 2009 9:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
A powerhouse in the Big East.
Well, so did Louisville. How long did that last?
Seriously, you are comparing apples and oranges here, and you apparently can’t tell the difference even upon close inspection.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 9:10 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No, you can't see the forest for the trees
It can happen, but it won’t if the blue hairs just look down from their lofty perch of “we can only care about basketball”
First time I shot her, shot her in the side.
Hard to watch her suffer, but with the second shot she died...
by btcoop71 on Sep 29, 2009 9:12 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Really?
Where am I wrong? By the way, I am a “blue hair,” and you will be also, one day.
Caring about a thing does not guarantee excellence, and you can’t make people care about a sport that they … don’t care about.
The world as it is.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 9:14 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just don't believe in never
that is all
First time I shot her, shot her in the side.
Hard to watch her suffer, but with the second shot she died...
by btcoop71 on Sep 29, 2009 9:15 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We were always good Tru
You are the best, disagreements happen, so be it.
First time I shot her, shot her in the side.
Hard to watch her suffer, but with the second shot she died...
by btcoop71 on Sep 29, 2009 9:19 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
:-) The way it should be.
Well argued.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 9:20 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
OK Tru, answer me this then
which came first, the fans or the success???
By your reasoning, people will never care about football in Kentucky…..I find that wrong, but let’s say you are right. If the Cats were to win an SEC championship in football, will the fans not care??
Would that not go a long way towards building a program?
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on Sep 29, 2009 9:17 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sure, they will care.
Attendance will go up. Fans will celebrate. We’ll get more football fans.
Will they ever outnumber basketball fans, or even be close? I say no, but “ever” is a long time.
The answer to your question is “success.” If you don’t believe that, go back and look at ttendance back during the dark days.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 9:20 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That title is a joke by the way
I had my sarcasm filter on
First time I shot her, shot her in the side.
Hard to watch her suffer, but with the second shot she died...
by btcoop71 on Sep 29, 2009 9:14 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
At a basketball school
First time I shot her, shot her in the side.
Hard to watch her suffer, but with the second shot she died...
by btcoop71 on Sep 29, 2009 9:10 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
In the Big East, a conference known for great football.
< / sarcasm >
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 9:11 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Point taken there
But, they will be in a BCS bowl game, that’s not too shabby.
The overall point being, a historical basketball school decided to elevate their football program with great success.
First time I shot her, shot her in the side.
Hard to watch her suffer, but with the second shot she died...
by btcoop71 on Sep 29, 2009 9:13 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Once again ...
… I recommend this post to you.
We keep coming ’round to the same assumption that if you can do it in the WAC or the Big East, you can do it in the SEC
That’s a false assumption.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 9:15 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So turn that argument around
Are you saying that all other SEC basketball schools should not care, because historically Kentucky is the best an that is how it has to be? Tell that to Florida when they won back to back titles at a football school.
All I am saying is, dont’ be a negative ninny :o)
First time I shot her, shot her in the side.
Hard to watch her suffer, but with the second shot she died...
by btcoop71 on Sep 29, 2009 9:18 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Basketball is way different than football.
Way. Different.
Two good players can turn you into a national contender in basketball.
It takes many, many more in football.
Gotta keep it real. :-)
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 9:22 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Billy Donovan won two national titles because of 1 recruiting class
I don’t care how good a recruiting class you bring in for football… it still takes 4-5 years of sustained success to reach that level in football.
Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."
by chirop1 on Sep 29, 2009 3:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tru and Bt
Are both right. We are a basketball school, but we don’t have to accept losing in football.
Look, no one is denying Florida is much more talented than us. But talent has little to do with allowing Florida to run three straight 10 yard plus gains right up the middle on the first series Saturday. That’s bad coaching, as is allowing our team to have penalty after penalty, as is not having a solid special teams plan, as is some of the absurd play calls we’ve made over the past 2 plus seasons.
I find it interesting that everyone picked at Tubby, saying he only won with Pitino’s recruits. Is not the same true in a way about Brooks? Wasn’t Woodson a Guy Morris recruit? Brooks has brought some decent defensive players in, but he has not been able to bring in solid skill players the way Morris and Mumme did. And I’m not sure that Newtown will be much better.
So yes, we are behind in recruiting, but that’s not an excuse for the first quarter the other night. Brooks’ teams are rarely ready to play in the first half from what I’ve witnessed.
by daniel81 on Sep 29, 2009 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why do you make the assumption that being in the SEC is
the single biggest stumbling block to success???
Why is that the same tired lame excuse eveyone in this state makes when the football program stumbles?? We use it as one of the single biggest selling points when it comes to basketball……
THAT right there is what dooms this program……allowing excuses to exist that stand between them and success…you are smart enough to know Tru that how you approach the problem is at least as important as what you choose to do to solve it…..Boise State simply put together a program that allowed them success in what they wanted to do….the formula may be tougher to complete here, but it stands as the same. Is the SEC tough, sure…..as tough as it gets. I am not expecting to take over the conference, I am expecting not to get embarrassed everytime someone comes into this stadium wearing orange and blue.
I find it so hard to believe that people take the same set of circumstances and make them a stumbling block for football, and tout them as building blocks for success in basketball…..
And the reality is, that unless we change our attitude and approach, nothing else will change, period.
You set a goal, and allow nothing that gets between you and that goal to get in your way.
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on Sep 29, 2009 9:00 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd say the SEC is UK's biggest asset for attaining success
Players want to play in the SEC, because that give them exposure and the ability to play against the best.
First time I shot her, shot her in the side.
Hard to watch her suffer, but with the second shot she died...
by btcoop71 on Sep 29, 2009 9:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly....I get so tired of the
“Well, we do play in the SEC” excuse. That ought to be why we get the better athletes and coaches.
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on Sep 29, 2009 9:05 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Heh.
Why is that the same tired lame excuse eveyone in this state makes when the football program stumbles?? We use it as one of the single biggest selling points when it comes to basketball……
More unintended hilarity. Sorry, but I cannot take any argument that rejects reality in favor of fantasy seriously. I applaud your attitude, but I am baffled by your refusal to examine the evidence and make a logical conclusion.
But hey, as fans, if we can’t live a little in hope, why bother? :-)
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 9:09 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hey, I calls 'em as I sees 'em.....
you said yourself, and I believe I am quoting here,
“you put a team of really good 2-3 star players up against a group of really good 4-5 star players and I will show you a winner every time”…that’s paraphrasing, so please forgive me if it is not exact….being in the SEC should get us those 4-5 star athletes….AND coaches.
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on Sep 29, 2009 9:12 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Where do you suppose Florida and Alabama get most of their 5*'s?
Let me give you a hint … From Florida and Alabama respectively.
Given that fact, I think you can see the difficulty. Unless, of course, you did not read Matt’s post as I recommended.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 9:17 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Because a lot of those kids move to those areas for that purpose
I lived in Mobile Ala for three years, you would not believe the people that moved into that area with their superstar kid to get them the attention of those schools, because even if they didnt get into Florida and Bama, as soon as they were looked at by those schools, more came knocking.
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on Sep 29, 2009 9:19 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And I read Matt's post 10 minutes after it was up
I am not sticking my head in the sand here. I am telling all of you that the only way we will get any better is if we stop accepting these same excuses every year.
Was it not Adolph Rupp who said “You show me a good loser, and I’ll show you a loser”>
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on Sep 29, 2009 9:22 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And I am trying to explain ...
… that you are, for the most part, kidding yourself. You aren’t kidding me. I know and acknowledge the reality here, and you are essentially saying there is something wrong with that.
There isn’t. You are welcome to your hope, and I don’t hold it against you. Just don’t demand the same from everyone — it isn’t right, and it isn’t defensible. Some people will agree with you, and I’m fine with that. Others will look at the evidence and reach the same conclusions as I have.
For my part, I am satisfied with the progress of football, and as long as we don’t go backward, I think it bodes well for the future. But I am confident that I will not live long enough to see Kentucky a consistent SEC champion. In fact, I would consider it something if I live long enough to ever see UK an outright SEC champion in football.
That’s just how I see it. Your mileage may vary.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 9:27 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, you know what they say,
admitting you have a problem is the first step in recovery….;-)…..lol……I hope you are wrong…..cause I want you to live long enough to print that article. I want you to have to write about the Cats SEC championship and playing for a National Championship in football…..
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on Sep 29, 2009 9:30 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Honestly ...
… I would love to be proven wrong. I would eat my crow with rapture. :-)
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 9:31 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fair Enough......
man….now I am tired….wont get a thing accomplished today……bringing you pessimists around is such hard work……lol….
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on Sep 29, 2009 9:33 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
One quibble.
You say that because UK fans focus most of their attention on basketball over football, so that the
the football discussion on Kentucky fan sites can sometimes be a little hyperbolic or even occasionally incoherent. It usually boils down to criticizing the coaching and the quarterback, or the punter, or whoever was the major proximate cause of the catastrophic play that cost us the game.
This is true of basketball too. How many times, do we end up blaming the coach (Gillispie, Smith), the “quarterback of the hardwood”—the point guard—(porter, Saul Smith), or the player that misses two free throws late when down only one?
And on the other side, football powerhouses tend to blame A) the coaching, B) the quaterback, C) the athlete with the particularly costly blunder or D) the officials. Notre Dame fans are calling for the scalp of Charlie Weis. Jim Tressel is taking heat in Ohio St. as is Bob Stoops in Norman “for not winning the big one.” Think LSU and Michigan fans weren’t mad as hell at quaterbacks last year?
As knowledgeable as Kentucky fans are about basketball, fans of the above schools are just as knowledgeable about football. Just as fans from traditional football schools make criticisms of head coach and quarterback because they are the highest profiles/easiest targets, so too we denigrate Hartline and Brooks.
Incoherence, hyperbole and blaming the coach or signature player aren’t consequences of being basketball myopic, they’re consequences of being fans.
by Thomas Hunt Morgan on Sep 28, 2009 10:15 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Well, you make a good point ...
… but my response would be that when you go to the blogs or message boards of football schools, there is far more analysis of what went wrong, much like there is at UK for basketball. It may ultimately wind up that the coach or quarterback is the most convenient target after the analysis is done, but the debate tends to be more about the process than the result.
Here at Kentucky, that’s true of basketball, but not so much football. For football, we are much less interested in why we lost than the fact of the loss, and tend to reflexively blame A), B) and C) rather than to do so after examining the totality of the circumstances. That’s really the point I’m trying to make.
And that make sense. Fans who are deeply invested in a particular sport care more about the particulars of that sport, the process, the nuts and bolts. That’s one reason why UK fans are credited with being so “knowledgeable” about basketball. But nobody would dispute that UK fans, as a group, are far less invested, and therefore less knowledgeable, about football. That’s just the way it is, in my opinion.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 28, 2009 11:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kentucky is a football school along with being a basketball school. The fans love all sports and support the teams like crazy. Saturday, we were behind 31 to 0 and the tv announcers commented about how the Kentucky fans were going crazy when it looked like we might score.
We have a good team. We just are not where we want to be yet!
by oldkentucky on Sep 29, 2009 4:18 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
We do have a good team.
It isn’t a good team compared to Florida, but we have a good team compared to most of division I. Hopefully, it will get even better.
But making the transition to the top of the SEC from where we are now would require a remarkable, quantum leap in talent and performance. Looking at our roster, I don’t find that likely.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 7:15 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
There is an even more succinct post on this at KSR
Matt wrote one of his better posts in some time today on the topic of fan expectations. I’ve said before that there are inherent challenges in making UK football a top 10 program that go beyond Coach Brooks and Coach Phillips. I don’t expect most people to accept his reasoning, but it is the cold hard truth of college football in these times.
http://kentuckysportsradio.com/?p=29654
"The IQ of a mob is the IQ of its most stupid member divided by the number of mobsters." --Terry Pratchett
by Ontherocks on Sep 29, 2009 6:27 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Jumping Off The Bandwagon
As I have said before I’m not a huge UK football fan but I always want to see them do well. UK football fans are,well,fickle. More so than UK basketball fans and I see it on here even with people like Tru. They can’t wait for football season to start,have all kinds of wild predictions such as Uk going 9-3 or 10-2,playing in a BCS bowl in January. And folks were still saying this even after a less than stellar performance against UL. Then comes number one Florida and many were saying things were going to be different this year. No more games like last years 65-3. Then came the beating last Saturday at the hands of the Gators. Now the season is over and when is midnight madness. I don’t understand the “sky is falling” position many are taking. This team and program is what it is. A lower half SEC east team that will win 6 games and go to a mid level bowl game which is better than the 2 or 3 win teams of not long ago. If you are indeed a Tru-blue Cat football fan,you will accept this,accept the beating by Florida,which by the way is number one in the nation and a national championship contender,and cheer on the Cats against Bama.
by maysvilleblue on Sep 29, 2009 7:15 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Well said
I agree completely. The fair weather fans have jumped ship. If this team learns from the hard lessons that come from taking on the elite of college football back to back, they can still have a good season. I haven’t seen an injury report but I think UK came out of that game in good shape physically. You cannot improve unless you play the best. Let’s judge UK’s season after we have played some teams that are not better than some pro teams. And I don’t completely agree that Florida took its foot off the gas. They were still using those same freaky option formations in the drive that Tebow got t-boned on. I think once the UK players started breathing again, they made some better plays on defense and can build upon that. The offense, on the other hand, has major work ahead of it.
by kywineman on Sep 29, 2009 8:31 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yep.
We still have to pretend that they are better, because that’s what fans do. I mean, if there is no hope at all, why watch the game or cheer? The fact is that there is always hope. Amazing things do happen.
But we can’t lose sight of reality, and your comment is pretty much reality. We can try to ignore it for awhile after a great victory, or deny it to annoying fans of other teams, but when it’s all said and done, UK has so many structural difficulties in getting to a highly competitive level in the SEC that they are overwhelming.
But every game is a game, and that’s why we cheer. That’s why we hope. That’s why we sometimes engage in “irrational exuberance.”
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 8:37 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're killing me
I am absolutely not going to accept taking a beating every time Florida or UT suits up against us. That is the exact opposite of fanhood, and defies the concept of supporting and believing in the program. I know that you don’t do either when it comes to football, but that doesn’t mean that those of us who do should just take it.
No, I don’t think anyone expected us to beat Florida. We did expect the team to compete and not look like lambs to the slaughter in the first quarter. Dead ball penalties on offense are unacceptable, I don’t care who the team is. If I’m irrational for asking my football team to play hard and at the height of its ability, then send me to Central State.
You won’t find any other football team in the country just being complacent with the fact that their team can’t play with the big boys. Apparently it’s okay for Kentucky though, which is why we own the two longest losing streaks in the country and are working on a third. Even Stanford beat USC, but we’re nuts for thinking we can do something similar.
Accepting mediocrity? No. Won’t do it, and I don’t like being told I have to.
Anything but Gatorade - yet another SEC sports blog
by Anything but Gatorade on Sep 29, 2009 10:47 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
AMEN, AMEN, AMEN
see my post below -
my expectations for a trip to the SEC championship once every 10 years might be a bit much but there is NO excuse to own the two longest active losing streaks in the nation.
Navy vs Notre Dame was previously the longest – to most it is clear why navy fell but look how far ND had to fall for them to stop the streak.
Even though i concede that the production of athletes in kentucky puts us at a disadvantage, there is NO WAY we should have longer losing streaks vs UT and UF than Vandy – NO WAY…
I may be too narrow in defining success or failure, but breaking those streaks should be at the top of the list in judging the condition of the UK football program….
only one rule in my house - uk has to be your favorite college bball team
by memphis wildcat on Sep 29, 2009 10:53 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The psychological term is Learned Helplessness
I think some fans think that since it has not happened in a while, it will not. I’ma glass half full kind of guy myself.
First time I shot her, shot her in the side.
Hard to watch her suffer, but with the second shot she died...
by btcoop71 on Sep 29, 2009 10:56 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Heh.
Well, one thing is for sure – we don’t have to accept getting beaten by Florida. We don’t have to accept mediocrity.
I agree that we failed to compete, and we reasonably should have expected to do so, even if we lost. Rolling over 31-0 in a 15-minute quarter is not mediocrity, that is abject failure. If that’s all we should expect, then we really are doomed.
There is no complacency, I think, in understanding that “the big boys” are just that, and you aren’t one of them. It is what it is. Is that “accepting mediocrity?” Not at all, but it is recognizing it when you see it. :-)
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
abject failure..for sure..
i would say 23 loses in a row to any team is mediocrity – not sure what to call losing to 2 teams for that many years in row…
i will say this though – we have more fans comment on uk football than most other schools in the SEC have fans comment on basketball. some of the streaks of futility by SEC schools in winning at Rupp, in Lexington or vs UK in bball rival our futility vs UF/UT in football but there fans just do not care….
the silver lining to all this debate is that we still care….
only one rule in my house - uk has to be your favorite college bball team
by memphis wildcat on Sep 29, 2009 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Heh.
Good point. And I do care – a lot.
I want to beat ‘Bama and Florida as bad as any football fan in America. But I also understand that we are overmatched in both cases, and that a victory, even at home, would be a huge upset. That is reality. It may suck, but there it is – you can’t deny it, you can’t reason with it, it doesn’t feel pity or remorse, or fear, and it absolutely will not flinch in the face of denial.
Reality bites. But fans still care.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
and at least we broke the
bama streak a few years ago – even if it was by “accident” – wasn’t that one of couch’s finest moments…
only one rule in my house - uk has to be your favorite college bball team
by memphis wildcat on Sep 29, 2009 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
-1
I think Kentucky fans, mostly made up of part-time and half-hearted football fans
Speak for yourself on that one Tru.
First time I shot her, shot her in the side.
Hard to watch her suffer, but with the second shot she died...
by btcoop71 on Sep 29, 2009 8:23 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Also, UK consistantly ranks in the top 25 in football attendence nationally
First time I shot her, shot her in the side.
Hard to watch her suffer, but with the second shot she died...
by btcoop71 on Sep 29, 2009 8:25 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes.
That is certainly so. I figure we have at least 100,000 great football fans amongst the millions of basketball fans. :-)
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 8:27 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Some stats
2008, UK #23: http://web1.ncaa.org/web_files/stats/football_records/Attendance/2008.pdf
2007, UK #23: http://web1.ncaa.org/web_files/stats/football_records/Attendance/2007.pdf
First time I shot her, shot her in the side.
Hard to watch her suffer, but with the second shot she died...
by btcoop71 on Sep 29, 2009 8:29 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes.
I know. My point survives that, though.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 8:33 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No one is saying that there are more football fans than basketball fans
But, the first sentence of your post is almost demeaning to the tens of thousands of hard core football fans. Reality says it will be hard to ever compete for an SEC title, but pulling the glass half empty argument out after one bad loss is just a little too bandwagonish…..if that is a word…..and if I spelled that right…….
just saying
First time I shot her, shot her in the side.
Hard to watch her suffer, but with the second shot she died...
by btcoop71 on Sep 29, 2009 8:45 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No it isn't.
It’s a measure of how defensive UK football fans have become over the years, and how isolated they must feel. It was neither meant as demeaning, nor was it contextually demeaning whatsoever.
Don’t take offense. There was none intended, nor present.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 8:48 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not really that offended Tru
Just having a good old fashioned debate.
I do think UK football fans have a right to be defensive, when the attacks are coming from their own fan base.
First time I shot her, shot her in the side.
Hard to watch her suffer, but with the second shot she died...
by btcoop71 on Sep 29, 2009 8:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would not disagree with your point about UK football fans.
They certainly do have a right to be defensive, God knows. But the non-football fans at UK are, at best, going to have a nodding relationship with reality. That’s too bad, but it is what it is.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 8:56 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
One last point, I promise ;)
What happens if Rich Brooks does bring soem top 50 recruits in for a visit? Should the fans base tell them “We really only care about basketball, you should just go to Alabama or Florida.”
To me, that is what is implied in this post, and to a degree in the Matt Jones post. It is almost a “Woe is us, we will always suck, so why try” mentality.
/jumps off high horse
Still love you Tru
First time I shot her, shot her in the side.
Hard to watch her suffer, but with the second shot she died...
by btcoop71 on Sep 29, 2009 8:56 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Heh.
I did say, “mostly” for just that reason. We have some dedicated, long-suffering fans of football here, and I acknowledge that. But they are not just in the minority, but significantly in the minority.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 8:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
On Expectations.
I listened to part of the Rich Brooks call-in-show yesterday. A caller questioned Brooks on why seven years ago when he took over the program, UK was in the cellar of the SEC, and that is where UK remains today. When, then, can UK expect to compete regularly in the SEC?
As you might imagine, this provoked an angry (somewhat surprised too) response and in typical Brooksian fashion, he rattled off his three straight bowls wins and victories over Louisville in defense. If the caller wanted “to go back to where this program was seven years ago, then go ahead,” Brooks said.
I think, however, the caller had a fair question. Too many fans believe UK can “never” compete in the SEC East. That, to use a Brookism, is bullshit. While Brooks deserves adulation for his efforts to restore the program from the horrors of probation, he must play teams like Florida more competitively, beat Vanderbilt consistently, split games with programs like South Carolina and be competitive against the superstars. Getting outscored 106-12 in the past two seasons by Florida shouldn’t pass. Brooks acknowledged this and said we’ll see marked improvement against Alabama. If not he warned, check the ER. (not sure what he meant by that, but it sounded forceful)
by Thomas Hunt Morgan on Sep 29, 2009 8:44 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I would agree.
“Never” is a long time, and history demonstrates that UK has competed in the SEC, just not lately.
There will be times when we will be competitive. But I think what the caller meant to say, or express, was more about consistency than one-off. UK is capable of occasionally fielding teams that can do damage in the SEC. But if you look at 5-year periods, I think what we can hope for is approximately what we have done over the last four or five years.
I love what Brooks is doing, and if a UK coach ever accepted my arguments, he should be fired. Coaches are paid to try to produce the extremely unlikely, even the impossible. They rarely achieve it, but that’s their charge. They can never cop to reality, because it would demoralize the fan base. But not everyone has that restriction.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 8:54 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
perspective
The football team lost to number 1 Florida.
…They didn’t lose to Gardner Webb’s football team
by StillCatwoman on Sep 29, 2009 8:52 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
good one....
only one rule in my house - uk has to be your favorite college bball team
by memphis wildcat on Sep 29, 2009 10:13 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Time for a change?
Along with just about everyone else, I am appreciative of the job Brooks/Joker have done over the past few years. But I think it is also a reasonable conclusion to draw that this regime has peaked and will never get us over the proverbial hump (not to Nat’l Championship status, more to better-than-Carolina status). Why? Because of the system.
To borrow one of Tru’s comparisons, UK is trying to “out Alabama” Alabama. We have a fairly conventional offense and defense. Ultimately, the only way that can win is if you have better athletes (physical and/or mental). We don’t. And given the recruiting base issues, etc., we aren’t likely to anytime soon.
So how do we win? We win by playing a different game. As in baseball, where a moneyball or similar philosophy has allowed the A’s, Marlins, and Rays of the world to be occassionally competitive, UK needs to recognize that it can’t outspend or outrecruit its versions of the Yankees and Red Sox.
The only way UK can be competitive in the SEC is to develop some sort of gimmick – think the spread option, triple option, (DDMO?) etc. These were/are all offensive philosophies that allow non-traditional teams to be competitive. For UK to grab the brass ring, we must find the next innovation. Is this coaching staff capable of doing that? No, I don’t think so.
Thus, for UK to be competitive, it must swing for the fences with something different. What this means is that we may also have seasons where we win 0 or 1 games. We may pick the wrong gimmick/innovator, and it can be a disaster. Is that preferrable to the consisten mediocrity we have (and that Brooks/Joker is clearly good enough to deliver)? That’s the decision we have to make.
"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." -Inigo Montoya
by NYCCats on Sep 29, 2009 9:18 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Well ...
… I think you have a point. UK was most dangerous playing Mumme’s version of the spread, if you’ll recall.
So there is something to your argument. Does that mean we should change coaches? Well, the spread has as many negative recruiting connotations as positive, so I’m not sure it will help us there. Still, it could make the offense more explosive even with lesser talent.
Your point is well made. I’m not ready to dump Brooks for a RichRod clone, but your point is undeniable.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 9:29 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks
To be clear (and I’m sure you see it), this is NOT an argument to bring in the spread – that offense is almost traditional now. It is a view that to move up, we have to find the “next big thing” in football philosophy, whatever that is. I am not nearly knowledgeable enough to know what it is, but I’m sure there is a coach out there somewhere working on it. . .
"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." -Inigo Montoya
by NYCCats on Sep 29, 2009 9:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No, I got it.
The spread was just an example. It is much more mainstream now than back when Mumme ran it at Kentucky.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 9:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why bother with a gimmick offense?
We’ve been there before, the blowouts were more frequent, and we had far less respect among our conference peers than we do today.
If UK wants to make a real investment in the quality of football here, start with improving the coaching at the high school level, build a better foundation of players that grow up here and make this state a more fertile recruiting ground. It’s a far more realistic approach than demanding that Rich Brooks steal home state talent from Urban Meyer.
"The IQ of a mob is the IQ of its most stupid member divided by the number of mobsters." --Terry Pratchett
by Ontherocks on Sep 29, 2009 9:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
well, the thing about a gimmick offense is, that it is only a gimmick
until everyone starts doing it….I think innovation is probably a better term
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on Sep 29, 2009 9:52 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That is obviously the better long-term solution.
Maybe it will happen. Who knows?
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 9:52 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If you visit places where College Football is big
Then you will notice that friday nights will have a few HS games on TV, a half dozen with live play by play on the radio and nearly full stadiums. It’s a sign that football is a part of the local culture.
I’ve seen nothing in Kentucky that remotely resembles the areas of northern Indiana (near South Bend) that I visit frequently. And that area pales in comparison to Texas and Florida.
It’s just so different here and football is so different from basketball, that blaming a single coach or offensive system is way to simple and easy.
"The IQ of a mob is the IQ of its most stupid member divided by the number of mobsters." --Terry Pratchett
by Ontherocks on Sep 29, 2009 10:05 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hehe.
blaming a single coach or offensive system is way to simple and easy.
How’s that working out in South Bend?
by Thomas Hunt Morgan on Sep 29, 2009 10:09 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Okay......here's this......
I spent some time in Nebraska this summer. You know, the Huskers? And I can tell you this is what I deducted as an outsider looking in. They have great fans, sure. 300 consecutive sell-outs(this past Saturday) in Lincoln, that is something worth celebrating. But their sports enthusiasm is about Sept 1 – Jan 1, and over and out.
Not much commenting on message boards at all, that I could find, and not a lot of fandom shows in their yards or on their vehicles or any of the other places we here in KY like to show our pride. I drove the trips and was able to take in the scenery from one end of the state to the next. There is just not the passion there for college sports that there is here in KY. We UK fans are so passionate about our teams. Period. And that passion is a 365 day long passion. We do not have to have a big game to talk Wildcats. We can go the the grocery in mid-June and talk Wildcats with just about anyone we meet.
UK fans are unique from my point of view. Every UK wants to display their fandom in some way, if only a small way. Have you ever noticed how many vehicles has some sort of UK pride? Take a conscious look sometime, across the state…
And UK does have this group of fans, to which I belong, that loves UK sports. I wish I could be like the feel good story from yesterday’s post and support all sports teams. I am a Wildcat fan, and that includes for me, win or lose. I was mostly excited about basketball, but I decided that wasn’t enough support . I want to be a big Wildcat fan.
So yes, while I have to agree that KY is mostly a basketball state, I am not going to let it define how I cheer for the Wildcats. I will always say….GO CATS ! !
~ your mileage may vary. :-)
Blue... there is no other color to Bleed !!!
by a2d2 on Sep 29, 2009 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like it.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
well said
just as you posted this i was saying the same thing just above…
we blog more about football than other SEC schools do about basketball. also, the futility against UK in bball by most schools rivals some of our football futility – however, we still care and the others just do not care….
only one rule in my house - uk has to be your favorite college bball team
by memphis wildcat on Sep 29, 2009 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
sorry memphis.....I didn't know
I will have to back track to find it now…lol….so many posts I marked all as read
:-)
Blue... there is no other color to Bleed !!!
by a2d2 on Sep 29, 2009 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
no need for apology
we actually posted the same thing at the same time….
great minds think alike…..
only one rule in my house - uk has to be your favorite college bball team
by memphis wildcat on Sep 29, 2009 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
exactly.....
Blue... there is no other color to Bleed !!!
by a2d2 on Sep 29, 2009 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
by the way memphis.....
I’m wondering if you ever put your UK tire cover back on your jeep? It has to be hard not to wear it…..lol
Blue... there is no other color to Bleed !!!
by a2d2 on Sep 29, 2009 11:51 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
not yet
getting close – was about to right before the ncaa news broke and it stirred the pot a bit.
the new coach has gotten some really good recruits so i believe things are dying down. however, am concerned that once the season starts, the locals will once again start dreaming of what might have been and get stirred up again…
only one rule in my house - uk has to be your favorite college bball team
by memphis wildcat on Sep 29, 2009 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Eff em!
get a .45 and dare someone to mess wit you :)
good luck this season, especially when UK starts kicking ass and taking names. luckily all I have to deal with is Hog fans and reassuring them that Pelphrey WILL get things turned around. WHEW!!! that dude needs to get me game tix for all the cheerleading I’ve been doing for him these last coupla years!!
I LOVE COOKING WITH WINE
Sometimes I even put it in the food.
by bluecrip on Sep 30, 2009 12:56 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Stirring the pot again.
The offense at times looked more dynamic and capable when Cobb was the signal caller last season (specifically the Georgia game).
Doubtless, he would add mobility and speed to the position and the offense. Should we make the switch?
That said, Joker’s offense worked reasonably well in 2006 and 2007. If the offensive woes have been due to personnel and not scheme, Joker/Sanders/Brooks should be flexible enough to change for the current roster.
by Thomas Hunt Morgan on Sep 29, 2009 10:16 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
All you say Tru is fair....
i have put forth the recruiting argument before as well – particularly when it comes to interior linemen – “skilled” positions seem to be easier to steal away a player here and there.
At the end of the day, i wish UK could become a top 15 program but realize it will not happen. My expectations are that we get to SEC championship once every 10 years and are 500+ in SEC play about half the time. With an appropriate OCS, that means we have a shot of winning 9+ games every 4 or 5 years.
That being said – here is where i begin to lose it. We now have the two longest losing streaks in the country between teams that play every year. Until navy beat notre dame a couple of years ago, that was the longest. to me, having longer losing streaks than vandy vs those 2 teams is unacceptable. a close second is the recent losing streak to carolina. i know brooks is “only” responsible for the last 7 (?) losses in the UT/UF streak, but if he really was making progress, you would think we would have broken at least 1 of those during his tenure.
For all he has done – which is very good, imo – not breaking those streaks is the most disappointing.
i will admit that is a bit narrow focused, but that is what comes to the surface for me…
only one rule in my house - uk has to be your favorite college bball team
by memphis wildcat on Sep 29, 2009 10:25 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah ...
… those losing streaks really do stick in my craw, too. You would think we could have broken them now by accident, if not on purpose.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 10:27 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
***YAWN***
…is it basketball season yet?
by Blueboy on Sep 29, 2009 10:29 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
so...
does this make Terrence cody Mothra?
and our running back corps the Three Headed Monster?
also we’re def talking old Japanese movie Godzilla and not that horrid american version right?
I love a good giant monster flick, on top of a good zombie flick (ZOMBIELAND THIS FRIDAY!!!)
Terrence Cody drinks your milkshake!
by Wallacewade04 on Sep 29, 2009 10:41 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Why Tru & Jones Are Correct
Big time college FB programs get a large majority of players from within 200 miles of their campus. Urban Meyer
"The principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale."
—Thomas Jefferson
by Wild Weasel on Sep 29, 2009 11:26 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
agree they are right....
that is why i do not expect UK to be “big time” (ie top 15 year in and year out), but do expect a bit more every few years than we have been getting…
wait – i thought you said you had posted your last comment on UK football… :)
only one rule in my house - uk has to be your favorite college bball team
by memphis wildcat on Sep 29, 2009 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not So Much UK Specifically
As a commentary on FB in general but not posting the link would have been denying relevant information to an interested (and interesting) group.
"The principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale."
—Thomas Jefferson
by Wild Weasel on Sep 29, 2009 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow.
Great link. Sort of makes the case look like a slam dunk with a stepladder.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
great link WW
very interesting
Blue... there is no other color to Bleed !!!
by a2d2 on Sep 29, 2009 12:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
there are all valid points in my opinion
1. UK has richer basketball tradition, greater fanbase on basketball than football.
2. Some subset of basketball fans are equally passionate on the football team.
3. UK is lagging behind its SEC opponents. BIG TIME.
4. UK football has been in ‘REBUILDING’ stage as long as we can remember.
5. Rich Brooks and Philips made a lot of progress, but still failed to compete with the big boys.
I understand why the fans are frustrated after the Florida lost, we have the right to be upset because the players were unprepared, they came out playing nervous and scared. They did not believe in themselve. I say the players deserved as much fault as the coaches. Can the scheme we employed on Saturday game yield a ‘WIN’ if we had NFL quality players executing them, absolutely yes. But unfortunately we don’t have the necessary talents.
Should Broocks and CO take all the blame for not recruiting better? I think they deserve a fair dosage of grace, and if not complement for what they had accomplished thus far. Remember not long ago UK was under probation, that any reasonably good players would not even sniff at our scholarship players. Is the coaching stuff recruiting better highschool talents now, the answer is absolutely yes, at least they are trying with reasonable success now.
Now on the future, does letting Philips inherit the program means continuity of mediocrasy for UK football team? I say not necessary. First, there is a BIG difference in the role of assistant coach and head coach, can Philips exceed accomplishment of Brooks? No body can guarantee success in future, but I would say it is as equally probable to success and to fail. It is too soon to pass your judgement now, remember Mike Tomlin brought the Steelers team to Superbowl in his first year, and remember the Tomlin’s predecesor laid solid foundation for his first year success.
by khlim2 on Sep 29, 2009 11:32 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Question
What if UK were willing to drop Calipari money on a football coach – a big established name. (I know the likelihood, I’m just creating a scenerio.) In essence that would then help recruiting as players would want to come to play for said coach and he could use the whole, “Come be the beginning of Kentucky football” approach to sell it.
There just HAS to be some way to get players to want to play at Kentucky. I am a true believer that having a coach that people want to play for – that is well known for producing big results – is a good a starting place as any.
It is not worth an intelligent man’s time to be in the majority. By definition, there are already enough people to do that.
by kentuckygirl0724 on Sep 29, 2009 11:36 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
A big name coach brings in a lot of money
That’s why UK is willing to pay a boat load of money for Cal. If a coach like Meyer is willing to sign for UK, I doubt the administration would be stingy on the wage offer.
by khlim2 on Sep 29, 2009 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
personally...
i think it would help. however, i do not believe it would allow us to be a top 15 program year in and year out. the geography of recruiting does not make it possible.
however, i do think losing streaks of 20+ years and a run to the SEC championship every 10 years is possible…..but what do i know….
only one rule in my house - uk has to be your favorite college bball team
by memphis wildcat on Sep 29, 2009 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
See the link above in Wild Weasel's post.
Even Steve Spurrier has not managed to do it at South Carolina, and South Carolina is far more fertile recruiting country than Kentucky.
A big name coach, even assuming we could pay one enough to pass up better jobs to coach at UK, would make a difference, but only in shades of gray. It would not get us anywhere near the top of the SEC heap. South Carolina is one example, but there are others.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
"shades of gray"....
are you saying the only way to be a successful coach is to operate in the gray area…
jk – i know that’s not what you meant but could not resist given our past debates on the gray areas of big time college sports…….:)
only one rule in my house - uk has to be your favorite college bball team
by memphis wildcat on Sep 29, 2009 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Haha!
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 3:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i.e. Brian Kelly
First time I shot her, shot her in the side.
Hard to watch her suffer, but with the second shot she died...
by btcoop71 on Sep 29, 2009 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Heh.
With all due respect, this caused me to laugh. Kelly is a fine coach, no doubt.
How do you think he’d do with a schedule like this:
Florida (#1)
Alabama (#3)
At South Carolina #28
At Auburn #27
Instead of:
at Oregon State (unranked)
at Fresno State (unranked)
at Miami (OH) (unranked)
Open
At FSU (#29)
Just asking. Also, I would point out that southern Ohio is much more fertile recruiting ground than anywhere in Kentucky. When given a choice between UC and UK, why would any quality recruit pick UK? Because of the coach? Doubtful.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hello, BIG SHINY ESPN TV CONTRACT????
national stage on which to play every week….who wouldn’t want to be seen knocking the #1 player in the game to the dirt with a CLEAN hit??
You are not telling me that southern Ohio….and believe me I KNOW southern Ohio…kids would not like to play at UK….
Most of those families in southern Ohio have Kentucky roots…..I am one of them….
I mean c’mon,
What’s this lying around s***??
Nothing is over until WE decide that it is.
Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?Hell, no…… And it ain’t over now. Cause when the going gets tough……….the tough get going…..now who’s with me??
Where’s the spiritWhere’s the guts Huh??This could be the greatest night of our lives, but you guys are gonna let it be the worst…..not me, i’m not gonna take this….
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on Sep 29, 2009 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I think what we need here is a
C…A….T…S……CATS…..CATS…..CATS !! GO BLUE !!
:-)
Blue... there is no other color to Bleed !!!
by a2d2 on Sep 29, 2009 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Haha!
Hilarious! points for the Animal House reference.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yes - i almost pulled the
“was it over when the germans bombed pearl harbor” at half time of the UF game – but was afraid it was over……
only one rule in my house - uk has to be your favorite college bball team
by memphis wildcat on Sep 29, 2009 1:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I thought the i.e. gave it away
I meant a coach like that, someone who can come in and light a fire.
My bad
First time I shot her, shot her in the side.
Hard to watch her suffer, but with the second shot she died...
by btcoop71 on Sep 29, 2009 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ah.
Gotcha.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 3:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I dont know
You gotta start somewhere. I think spending the cash on a big name coach is a good a place as any.
It is not worth an intelligent man’s time to be in the majority. By definition, there are already enough people to do that.
by kentuckygirl0724 on Sep 29, 2009 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tink...."if you build it, they will come".....
your idea is as good as anyone else’s…….
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on Sep 29, 2009 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was at UK the last time we tried a big name coach.
The “Bill Curry” years were not conducive to football, they were conducive to drinking rum and bourbon though.
by wklawdog on Sep 29, 2009 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am not sure using Bill Curry as a "Big" name is really relevant
I was in Alabama while he was coach there…..they never thought much of him at Bama either…..the fact that he coached there didnt make him much of a name….that’s why we got him so easy
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on Sep 29, 2009 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
C'mon, maybe Bama did not like him
but he just took the team to a national championship and was a “name” coach. Hiring a “name” will not get it done in football. Players get it done and the state of Kentucky just does not have the base.
I would say a large reason why the state does not produce more is the financing of the schools. We have so many counties, with such small tax bases, they don’t have the funds to create strong football programs. Heck, the community where I live just began having little league football a few years ago. Before that, kids did not play football or learn technique until middle school. You can’t expect to have a recruiting base in that situation, especially when you compare it to southern states that have year round little league, pee wee league, etc. More practice time = more players.
by wklawdog on Sep 29, 2009 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is so right.
But it is far easier for folks to blame and suggest throwing money at a problem to make it go away. UK can have an impact on these issues if it really wants to think big picture. If they organized their boosters and corporate sponsors into getting increased publicity on High School football, got it on TV and radio and let that drive increased popularity at younger levels, there would be dividends in recruiting within 5 years. For some, that is just too much mediocrity to endure, and its easier to throw the baby out with the bathwater and start over with a big(ger) name and a gimmick offense.
"The IQ of a mob is the IQ of its most stupid member divided by the number of mobsters." --Terry Pratchett
by Ontherocks on Sep 29, 2009 3:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We have started somewhere.
Are we going to abandon the plan that has brought us up from a completely supine position?
Not likely.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No one is saying abandon the plan
Rich Brooks took us from the pit of despair (movie reference) and has the program above water, now is time for the next step. Is Joker the guy to take the next step? I hope so. If not, then you have to go get a coach (i.e. Brian Kelly type) who can put you over teh top.
First time I shot her, shot her in the side.
Hard to watch her suffer, but with the second shot she died...
by btcoop71 on Sep 29, 2009 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
There are two types of recruiters out there folks.....
there are the guys that pick through the resume’s and say Ill go sign this one, and this one, etc….until they get a full roster….they dont look at anyone that has less than 4 stars and pro potential. That is not a recruiter…..that’s an order taker…..then there are the coaches that go wherever the player is, show up on their front doorstep, and don leave until they get the kid……That is a recruiter……I want someone out there recruiting that doesnt leave until they get the kid…..no matter who they are….I want John Calipari to teach the football program how to develop a style of play that players want to knock down the door to get to play in…..then maybe we can quit blowing even more sunshine up the sunshine state’s backside……
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on Sep 29, 2009 1:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i believe Cal
has almost become an order taker…..
only one rule in my house - uk has to be your favorite college bball team
by memphis wildcat on Sep 29, 2009 1:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I get the points behind both sides of most of these arguments.
However, I just don’t get why all the doom and gloom after we lost to Florida? Yes, I hate it. Yes, we looked scared, unprepared, and like lesser men. Yes, the streak (and against UT and OBC) is ridiculous.
Still, in three games, we won the two we expected to win, and lost the one we expected to lose. We have yet to lose a game that we either should win or should compete closely in terms of talent and ability.
Long season left here, guys. A loss to potentially the best college football team to ever play the game is not doomsday. We didn’t lose to Gardner-Webb.
I vote for holding back some of these coaching and other criticisms until after South Carolina, Tennessee, and Auburn.
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
--O.W.
by blbskue on Sep 29, 2009 12:50 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
And yes, I get that the "we expected to lose" is both a personal belief
and one that is the heart of what some are arguing – let’s get to a point where we don’t expect to lose any game.
Still, this was a fantastic football team we lost to.
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
--O.W.
by blbskue on Sep 29, 2009 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Heh.
Well, no doom and gloom here. This was a loss that I expected. Yes, I hoped for a miracle victory or failing that, a solid showing of competence.
We got neither. Life goes on. Nobody died.
Next game, we’ll hopefully do better.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kentucky is not going to be a power football program.
It just won’t, for all the reasons stated here and elsewhere. I’ve been telling people that for years. There are too many barriers to overcome, and all of the believing and hoping won’t make them go away. Every straw I’ve seen pulled from the “WE CAN DO IT” crowd doesn’t stand up to scrutiny.
However, It isn’t unreasonable to expect to field a respectable team every year and a very good team that can make waves in the SEC every 3-5 years. And for the most part that is where we are now. Mark Story had a nice line in his article yesterday when he noted that “since the 2006 blowout loss to LSU in Baton Rouge, UK has had a chance to win in the second half of all 35 games it has played except for two — Florida in 2008 and Florida in 2009.”
That’s some real progress, and I think it can get better, but not tremendously better. Instead of being a bottom-feeder SEC program, I think we can be a middle of the road SEC program. But top tier? It’s just not going to happen.
Steve Spurrier is in his fifth year at South Carolina and yet a coach known for offensive fireworks has yet to find a way to manufacture a competent offense in those 5 years. He has as many bowl appearances and two fewer bowl wins than Kentucky has had in those same 5 years. Also, who was coaching South Carolina before that? Lou Holtz, another big name with a national championship under his belt. His record at South Carolina: 0-11, 8-4, 9-3, 5-7, 5-7, and 6-5.
Hire a big name coach? Give me a break.
The SI article on recruiting says it all. I don’t know how anyone can read that and come away encouraged in any way with Kentucky’s chances of luring in the type of talent needed to be a top football program.
I’m happy with the direction of the program and I think it can and will get better, but we’re probably never going to be on the same level as the Floridas and Alabamas of the world.
by BBallSophist on Sep 29, 2009 1:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Amen, amen and amen.
All that. Yowzah.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
story is not the first HL writer i read,
but that is a good observation on his part…
only one rule in my house - uk has to be your favorite college bball team
by memphis wildcat on Sep 29, 2009 4:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
just read the story column
as much as the comment you quoted made me feel better – and i agree is sign of progress – the next comment pushed be back closer to the edge :)
“In the seventh year of a coaching regime, you shouldn’t be 31 points behind to a conference foe in the first quarter under any circumstance.”
only one rule in my house - uk has to be your favorite college bball team
by memphis wildcat on Sep 29, 2009 5:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
"A loss to potentially the best college football team to ever play the game is not doomsday"
Florida is good, but I’m not even sure they’re the best team in the nation, much less ever. And no, Brooks didn’t take us from doomsday to the promised land. He took over a team that went 7-5 and returned a senior qb and led them to what, a three win season the next year? Outside of LSU and Georgia, we haven’t really beat anybody except cupcakes and a Clemson team that was obviously unmotivated in the music city bowl a few years ago. In my opinion, we haven’t played up to our talent since beating LSU.
I mean for goodness sakes, even Tennessee hung in the game with Florida at Florida. We looked like an OVC school and we should have lost to Louisville too. (Obviously I’m not a Brooks fan, never have been. My man Morris got disrespected by Evilhart.)
by daniel81 on Sep 29, 2009 1:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Kentucky isn't horrible
I’m an Alabama fan so take it for what it’s worth but I think Kentucky can be better. You have a great university with great fan support, you have very good facilities and you play in the best football conference in the land. Kentucky has all the potential it believes it has. You get blown out by Florida and everyone just seems to accept it as an inevitability, but let UK get blown out by Florida in basketball and those same fans are breathing fire in indignation. It’s all about; how much does it mean to you? Like St Nick (Saban) says “if it means something to ya’ you can’t stand still.” I really like CRB alot, but it doesn’t matter what I think, if YOU don’t believe he’s going to take you where you WANT – not where you feel you deserve – to be, then you have to turn up the heat a little. Complacency is the mortal enemy of success.
I really like UK, except for this Saturday of course. RTR!
"We intend to go out and hit people in the mouth. That's how we play. We're going to run the ball at you and we're going to stop you from running the ball. That's our personality, and we're going to have fun doing it." - Rolando McClain
by lcase373 on Sep 29, 2009 3:13 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Thank you Tony Robbins!
Clearly we just don’t WANT it bad enough around here.
Has nothing to do with the fact that Alabama gets 70% of it’s recruits from within 200 miles of campus and 55% from in-state. Compared to 40% and 30% respectively.
"The IQ of a mob is the IQ of its most stupid member divided by the number of mobsters." --Terry Pratchett
by Ontherocks on Sep 29, 2009 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Channeling my inner Stuart Smalley
You have a great university with great fan support, you have very good facilities and you play in the best football conference in the land. Kentucky has all the potential it believes it has…I really like UK
We are good enough, smart enough, and doggonit, Alabama fans like us!
I don’t mean to belittle this post, but I found it condescending, like Keyshawn patting Jon Gruden on the head.
"The IQ of a mob is the IQ of its most stupid member divided by the number of mobsters." --Terry Pratchett
by Ontherocks on Sep 29, 2009 3:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think ...
… you are seeing things.
You might see something similar from a well-meaning UK fan on basketball on an Alabama blog. My rule is to try not to impute to an ill-intention what can easily be explained by the inherent difficulties of the communications medium. :-)
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 3:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
fair enough
I’m ill tempered this week from defending Coach Brooks from people that oversimplify our issues, and over react from 1 bad loss.
"The IQ of a mob is the IQ of its most stupid member divided by the number of mobsters." --Terry Pratchett
by Ontherocks on Sep 29, 2009 3:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I totally understand that.
For more irritation, just scroll down a bit … :-)
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Heh.
Thanks. Always glad to have Alabama fans come by, you guys are the only SEC fans that have anything like the passion for sport that UK fans have, even if it is two different sports.
Great points, all. I don’t dispute any of them, but there are structural problems with the SEC and UK’s geographical location that make it difficult. Not impossible, of course, that word has no meaning. But the way the demographics of the South and the SEC are right now, it is still like climbing Mt. Everest in your underwear — theoretically possible but not likely.
I think Brooks is doing it the right way. I worry about somebody coming in and taking us back to probation in their haste to get us too far, too fast. Football is not like basketball. As someone said, one great recruiting class in basketball and you are a contender. To be a contender in football, it takes three or four.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 3:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Amen.......now if we can simply add a few nonbelievers....lol
thanks for stopping by….and you are right about a lot more than some people around here want to admit
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on Sep 29, 2009 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
A Known Coach
One thing is keeping the top football players in the state. Right now Louisville is down. We are supposedly riding a wave of improvement. Why can’t we keep the best in Kentucky at home?
They are going to listen to a man who has proven he’s a winner and the creditals to show he isn’t going to settle with being tickled to death by going six and six and to get to a minor bowl. We don’t have the history to impress a young man when he comes on the campus. We can’t show them trophies from major bowls and tell about all the all americans that have worn the Kentucky jerseys.
In basketball, we can do all that and more.
Until we get someone who is know across the country to all football programs, not just the local area we won’t get the quality players other schools get. Bring in some coach from a school that is know for his passing game, or developing top notch defenses and maybe we can get some of the athletes. from home and in other states who want to play for him. Forget loyalities to schools. Especially if its not a school who is barely making it to minor bowls.
by ParisGuy on Sep 29, 2009 3:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
And why, pray tell, will a coach that is known throughout the land for winning titles,
known to all in football circles, known for his passing game and great defenses going to come here? If he is that great (Saban, Meyer, Paterno, whoever, etc.) he will prefer to stay where he is (within 200 miles of most of his recruits) and if he has been let go (which means he probably messed up one of those places) why would he not go to a place that is within 200 miles of the recruits as it is easier to get the kids.
“Name” coaches do not go toi upstart schools, regardless of the money, in football unless that school is in a hotbed of athletic talent. In fact, with the exception of the last two “name” coaches that South Carolina has hired, I can’t think of any name coach (who was at the top of his game, as you seem to be desiring) that has ever gone to a school in our situation to coach football, not basketball, football.
by wklawdog on Sep 29, 2009 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We'll never know who might have been interested.
Why did Spurrier go to South Carolina? He saw potental. Why did the coach at Cincinnati go there? They weren’t exactly the perfect place for either to go if they wanted to walk into an established program. Or big money. If South Carolina can hire someone of championship caliber why can’t Kentucky? We should at least try to get the best available. Not settle for someone who had a good season or two with someone else’s recruits. ) i.e. good seasons as in beating three buy wins and a couple of others that battle for the bottom position in their division each year)Joker’s recruits are on the field now. Right now. No one else’s. Tuberville, who beat Alabama six or seven in a row, is out there. Had a 13-0 season. Phil Fulmer wants to coach again. Say what you want but he had some great teams at Tennessee. Think he wouldn’t like to kick their butt for the way he was shown the door? David Cutcliffe is at Duke. He coached two pretty good quarterbacks that are playing every Sunday. Two Superbowl Most Valuable Players. Think a kid would listen if they hear Cutcliffe wants to talk to him.?
What about the offensive coordinators at some of the more successful schools? Mississippi State took a chance on the guy from Florida.
BUT, its not going to happen. Not and Kentucky say face. We’re going to get Joker. They promised him the job and he may have or have not turned down other good jobs to wait on Brooks to leave.
Barnhart got Brooks out of retirement. Why should he want anything to change? He gets a bonus everytime Kentucky goes to a minor bowl. He finally got what evferyone thinks is the perfect coach in basketball.
Face it, without changing things at the top there is no way to know just who might be interested in Kentucky.
by ParisGuy on Sep 29, 2009 6:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What makes you think ...
… that even if we did, it would be better than what we have?
Sometimes, you have to dance with who brung ya, and right now, Brooks has brung us. He is not the prettiest, nor the sexiest, nor the most likely to … ahem … cooperate.
But he is a solid coach who has brought us along pretty well. Can he take us farther? We don’t know yet. Can Joker do better? We don’t know yet.
So explain to me, why would we want a new coach? To win the SEC? Don’t make me laugh, I’ve laughed enough today.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 7:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We don’t need a coach. You’re right. We have one. And the guy is who going to follow him. We have just what we want and deserve. Let’s stay just were we are. Last to next to last in the division. We don’t want to get any better. Heck, if we did it would only cause a raise in ticket prices.
I have seen six years under Brooks. We have certainly caused the teams in the Eastern Divsion to fear the Cats.
Truz, your right.
But one thing is for sure, it won’t be this year or next year or probably in the next four years before we’ll find out about any one else coaching the Cats.
Welve got it made. No coaching search, no fees to firms to check out the canidates.
Why did Spurrier go to South Carolina? Why did Cutcliffe go to Duke? Why did Nutt go to Ole Miss? Was that a step up for him?
You don’t know who would be interested or who wouldn’t.
d
by ParisGuy on Sep 29, 2009 9:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nutt is a snake oil salesman
he is NOT a NAME coach. he is a pathetic coach who used Orgeron’s recruits to make himself look good. he had a Maserati but couldn’t get it out of 2nd gear at Arkansas. he got lucky that he had some excellent HOMEGROWN talent agree to come play for him and wasted that talent, which is why he is GONE. they got tired of his RAH RAH BS. “Just you wait Mr Higgins, just you wait!” he’ll be kicked out of Ole Siss in no time.
Nutt should be leading a congregation not a football team.
I LOVE COOKING WITH WINE
Sometimes I even put it in the food.
by bluecrip on Sep 30, 2009 1:17 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Now wait just a minute
Nutt was coach at Murray State when I was there, I have much love for him.
Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."
by chirop1 on Sep 30, 2009 10:28 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
great person
snake oil salesman as a coach….two different things.
I LOVE COOKING WITH WINE
Sometimes I even put it in the food.
by bluecrip on Oct 1, 2009 9:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nutt's Father
Played for Adolph Rupp at UK.
by FortyYearCatFan on Oct 1, 2009 10:33 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nutt
Check his record at Arkansas and see if he accomplished anything we only dream about at Kentucky.
by ParisGuy on Oct 1, 2009 10:53 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Had better players than we
had at UK as well.
I LOVE COOKING WITH WINE
Sometimes I even put it in the food.
by bluecrip on Oct 1, 2009 1:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But it doesn't matter, does it?
Cutcliff couldn’t come here. There was no job opening when he was available. And from what I see at Duke, he is going along about like Brooks is here. So why would we want him, again?
Ditto Nutt, assuming that he turns out to be a better coach at Ole Miss than he was at Arkansas. Spurrier, we maybe should have asked, but that ship has sailed, and he hasn’t exactly built South Carolina into a powerhouse, has he?
So I guess we are in agreement.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 30, 2009 7:19 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Frankly, I find it amusing
that after going on a tirade about how things will not change because Barnhart is the root of all evil, you still never got around to answering my question of why a “name” coach, still in his prime (that should eliminate the Fat Phil issue) would choose to come here. Oh, and please don’t throw out the Cinncinnati reference again. Their man was not a name coach when they got him, but an up and comer which is what you said you did not want.
by wklawdog on Sep 29, 2009 7:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why did Spurrier go to South Carolina?
He saw potential. golf courses.
Fixed it for you.
"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." -Inigo Montoya
by NYCCats on Sep 30, 2009 9:00 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Brooks is here and Joker will take his spot
And I don’t see the record getting any better. As to Ontherocks comment, I’m not overreacting to one bad loss, I’m reacting to weeks of futility. Hey, anyone can schedule four cupcakes a year and beat the bottom of the SEC twice to get bowl eligible, but what’s the point? If that’s good enough, then let’s just cancel the program and ready for basketball. Woodson’s senior year we had a realistic shot at 10-2 and ended up barely beating a depleted FSU team in the music city bowl. We don’t need Urban Meyer right now, we need a coach that will really lay a frame for what we could someday be. I don’t think recruits are jumping at the bit to play for a team that was embarrassed by Florida and barely beat a horrible Louisville team.
by daniel81 on Sep 29, 2009 4:13 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
So we are all now ready to let the same magazine which
we all loathed when it showed “Kentucky’s Shame” on the cover give us another reason not to try to win football games……that poster from Bama had it right and deep down in those little places in our souls we all dont want anyone to see, we all know it.
We have accepted defeat and decided how we can make it manageable, or even “politically correct”. What complete apathy. Tru, you have a military background and a good sense of history, where would we have been if we allowed Japan or Germany to just have their way?? Korea and Vietnam sit well with you??
When did it become ok to just say, well, we can’t do any better because this magazine says so, or that guy says it can’t be done??
When are people going to wake up and realize this is about a choice?….we chose basketball lo so many years ago, and now, when we have the momentum, we choose it again as fans and say, well…..we did the best we could…..makes me sick to even hear it….
I have never heard so many people make excuses for something that they hold so dear….If this was one of your kids would you accept it if the school they attended told you that they had really good reading instructors, but their math teachers werent that hot??
Kentucky’s fans are like no others, we know that……no one can tell me that the same passion that drives the basketball program cannot be infused into this football program.
I said it earlier and I will say it again….Pitino did hit one nail right on the head….success is a choice……I guess we just chose something else….I am not sure what I would call it.
If you throw away your passion for what you love you will eventually cease to care about it, and that is what we have here. It’s like being in a marriage of convenience and saying the sex is “ok”….doesnt make any damn sense……
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on Sep 29, 2009 4:19 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Haha!
So we are all now ready to let the same magazine which we all loathed when it showed "Kentucky’s Shame" on the cover give us another reason not to try to win football games……that poster from Bama had it right and deep down in those little places in our souls we all dont want anyone to see, we all know it.
Ah, man you’re killing me! I am just positive we are on the same humor wavelength today. Heh.
“Do you hear that, Mr. Anderson? That is the sound of … inevitability.” — Agent Smith, The Matrix
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agent Smith gets it in the end you know......
lol….
When did the Borg invade Kentucky??
Since when is “Resistence is Futile” our motto?
We dont deserve a good football team if we are going to take this kind of an approach to it….
Even the Good Lord Himself doesnt like someone like that.
Revelation 3:16 quotes as “So, then because thou are lukewarm, neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth”
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on Sep 29, 2009 4:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well ...
… that’s proof positive. God hates me. :-)
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 4:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
God loves everybody.....He just wants
you to shape up and start being a better UK fan……lol……
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on Sep 29, 2009 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am a great UK fan.
I just know when to put on my Big Blue shades, and when to take them off. :-)
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 5:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
you say tomatoe, I say tomatoe.....lol....
it’s those bug eyes you have……you cant trust your vision when you see 700 of something out of each eye…..lol
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on Sep 29, 2009 5:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nah.
I have 700-700 vision :-)
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 5:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
by the way I noticed
you chose not to comment on my Borg remark….just wanted you to know I will be keeping an eye on you for any further Borg-like comments…..If you have been assimilated you wont be able to keep it a secret long…..lol
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on Sep 29, 2009 5:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Borg?
Ah, you mean those Borg? I thought you meant Victory Borge, or perhaps Bjorn Borg and just misspelled it. :-)
Resistance is futile. Your team is doomed by structure and geography to mostly-mediocrity. Deal with it, or drive yourself crazy. :-)
I, for one, have embraced the machine. Deus ex machina. :-)
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 5:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh my
I love this reply. Best of the thread.
Your team is doomed by structure and geography to mostly-mediocrity.
Out-freaking-standing!
"The IQ of a mob is the IQ of its most stupid member divided by the number of mobsters." --Terry Pratchett
by Ontherocks on Sep 29, 2009 11:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
:-) Thanks.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 30, 2009 7:21 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hey! Calm down people.
I had no intention of coming off as condescending, I was being sincere. After reading my post again I can see how someone may perceive it as a slight. But to believe that, however, requires you to also believe that it comes from a position of ridicule. If I appeared to be coming form that position than I apologize.
I prefaced my comment by saying I’m an Alabama fan, implying that I’m making my analysis from a distance and am not familiar with all the minutia. I was merely speaking, granted from the outside looking in, to the prevailing idea that Kentucky can only be a basketball school. I don’t see it that way, just as I don’t think UA has to be just a football school, but I may be wrong. It may not be a simple matter of desire, but “want to” and “belief” are defiantly parts of the equation. UA has this problem with basketball and UK has it with football.
JMO
"We intend to go out and hit people in the mouth. That's how we play. We're going to run the ball at you and we're going to stop you from running the ball. That's our personality, and we're going to have fun doing it." - Rolando McClain
by lcase373 on Sep 29, 2009 4:39 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It's cool.
Some of us are a little jittery after having been subjected to a temporary loss of manhood. 31-0 in the first quarter will do that to a fan. :-)
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 4:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
trust me, I know all about that.
i.e. Utah That one still stings.
"We intend to go out and hit people in the mouth. That's how we play. We're going to run the ball at you and we're going to stop you from running the ball. That's our personality, and we're going to have fun doing it." - Rolando McClain
by lcase373 on Sep 29, 2009 4:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
just for the record, you were still right....
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on Sep 29, 2009 4:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah.
I’ll bet. I was drop-dead shocked at that.
All I know is, 31-0 in the first 15 minutes felt like 100-0.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 4:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't remember much
about the Sugar bowl. It was 21-0 before I finished my first beer, so naturally I started drinking them faster. After that it gets a little fuzzy.
"We intend to go out and hit people in the mouth. That's how we play. We're going to run the ball at you and we're going to stop you from running the ball. That's our personality, and we're going to have fun doing it." - Rolando McClain
by lcase373 on Sep 29, 2009 4:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Heh.
Well, I had to blog the aftermath, so I didn’t even get to enjoy a little Maker’s Mark-induced amnesia. :-)
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 5:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Touché Sir
I look forward to reading your content leading up to Saturday.
Roll Tide!
"We intend to go out and hit people in the mouth. That's how we play. We're going to run the ball at you and we're going to stop you from running the ball. That's our personality, and we're going to have fun doing it." - Rolando McClain
by lcase373 on Sep 29, 2009 5:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for reading ...
… and your commentary. Both are appreciated.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 29, 2009 5:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
My first question is
since UK is a doormat university when it comes to football,what is the answer?Name a Coach and a PRICE that would deliver a National Championship?
by -Zoso- on Sep 29, 2009 8:46 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Doormat?
Well, not quite. Doormats don’t go to bowls, even when bowls are a dime a dozen. But we are not exactly mid-pack at the moment, either.
I think it really doesn’t matter if great head coaches were lined up ten deep to come here. We have made our choice, and our commitment. Let’s see where it leads us.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 30, 2009 7:23 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kentucky lacked confidence
in the Florida game. When your not confident you lose focus. The coaching staff should encourage the kids instead of talking about how good the other teams in the SEC are and falling back on “we’re a basketball school” excuse. How bout a little pride. They need to come out with a chip on their sholder instead of admiting defeat before the game even begins. They’ve got the fans behind them, all they need is to believe they can be winners also. I saw waaaay too many missed tackles in the Florida game. Like they knew the guy was going to get around. I’m sure the staff is doing what they can to get the team fired up but it didn’t show on the field last weekend. I just hope to see some attitude and excitement from the blue this weekend. At least calm down enough to EXECUTE.. Serioulsy though, a little confidence goes a long way. With confidence comes poise and focus, two things that recduce the amount of mistakes. Thats got to come from the leaders on the UK team and staff and just like the flu, confidence is contagious.
by Blue42 on Sep 29, 2009 9:02 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Tell us
Who told you they wouldn’t come to Kentucky?
You seem to be awfully certain it wouldn’t happen, so you must have first hand information the rest of us don’t.
by ParisGuy on Sep 29, 2009 9:20 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
To All Those Who Say "It Can't Be Done"
Cincinnati Bearcats are Exhibit A that it can be done.
It helps them that B-East is a weak BCS conference in football but there are good teams in that conference.
UC won it last year (played in Orange Bowl) and ranks Top 10 this year.
Cincy has a smattering of football tradition but nothing like Brian Kelly has brought to the program.
Hire the right coach…
by FortyYearCatFan on Sep 30, 2009 6:46 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The right coach isn't the reason.
All Cincinnati needed was three things they got:
1. A competent coach
2. One of the top teams (Louisville) to go south.
3. A weak conference (in UC’s case, two weak ones)
You seem to forget that UC moved out of Conference USA in 2005 to the Big East. In CUSA, they were a bowl team every year but one starting in 2000.
Contrary to popular belief, Cincinnati is not a case similar to Kentucky. They do not have a long history of futility like Kentucky has. For example, from 1976-2006, UC had 12 winning football seasons. In that same stretch, UK had a total of eight winning seasons. UC went to bowls every year between 2000 and 2002, then missed ’03 and ’05 and have been back to bowls every other year.
UC turned around their program from its most recent decline back in 2000. The current coach had nothing at all to do with that. He inherited a program that had been on an upward trajectory for six years before Kelly took over.
As I have written, it is possible to grow a football program from futility in a weak conference like CUSA and the Big East. It is not realistically possible to do so in the SEC, no matter what coach you hire.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 30, 2009 7:45 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Brian Kelly Is A Budding "Star" Coach
Way more than just a “competent” coach.
Louisville is a decent football team.
Big East >>> C-USA in football.
Hire the right coach, and UK can be much better than they have been (lately).
by FortyYearCatFan on Sep 30, 2009 5:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, and ...
… one other thing.
Even though I have UC ranked very highly, they will not stay there. UC does not have the talent to compete with the likes of Florida, Alabama or LSU, or most likely even USF.
That’s going to show up sooner rather than later. Right now, they have beaten nobody. USF is likely to drill them at their place, and the season-ender at Pittsburgh looks like a loss to me.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 30, 2009 7:54 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
I think about how differently history could have played out a few years ago.
UofL was cruising in the Big East and had a date with a national title game against the “juggernaut” Ohio State program. UofL slipped up and Florida squeeked into the title game where they were prohibitive underdogs. Florida proceeded to expose Ohio State for the fraudulent product of an overrated conference that they were.
Just think how different history could have been if UofL hadn’t missed that kick late in the game against Rutgers and had wound up undefeated and #2. Ohio State would have killed them and the overrated status of the Big Ten might never have been exposed.
Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."
by chirop1 on Sep 30, 2009 10:33 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have to agree with forty on this one
First time I shot her, shot her in the side.
Hard to watch her suffer, but with the second shot she died...
by btcoop71 on Sep 30, 2009 8:51 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Even if the facts don't support his position?
Just askin’.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 30, 2009 12:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't see it that way
Think of Cincinnati’s recruiting base…….for years and years, the best players from Moller, Elder, St. Xavier, Colerain, etc. all went to Ohio State. If they didn’t make it to OSU, then they went to another Big 10 (11) school. Ohio State and the Big 10 (11) owned Cincinnati and Dayton.
Starting with Mark Dantonio, they started getting some of those players to stick at UC(Tony Pike is a great example, went to Reading). Dantonio went off to Michigan State, and in came the perfect storm in Brian Kelly to build off of the base built by Mark Dantonio.
Rich Brooks has built the base. It is time to get the best of the best from Louisville, Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky, etc. Plus, UK has made inroads in Tennessee and Georgia, and somewhat in South Carolina. Then, you have to get a foot in in Florida and Texas.
All we are saying is that it is possible, and that UK football fans are more than fairweather. “Never” is not an option. “Never” is an obtuse argument, and CIncinnati and Louisville prove that. Yes, they are not in the SEC, but the argument still holds water.
First time I shot her, shot her in the side.
Hard to watch her suffer, but with the second shot she died...
by btcoop71 on Sep 30, 2009 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, but ...
… I think your premise is flawed.
Ohio as a state is a much bigger recruiting base than Kentucky, and there are way more prospects within a 200 mile radius of Cincinnati than a 200 mile radius of Lexington — i.e. Columbus (mostly OSU territory), Indianapolis, Toledo, and even Cleveland is only 250 miles away.
They can’t all go to OSU or Notre Dame, and the leavings and scrapings from Ohio are better than most Kentucky recruits. So I don’t buy the recruiting base argument at all.
Second, looking at Cincinnati’s recruiting, I don’t see that it is even as good as UK’s over the last three years. That tells me that they are a well-coached team playing in a weak conference. UK is a well-coached team playing in the toughest conference in America.
So in the end, I don’t buy the argument that UC is better because of Kelly than Kentucky is because of Brooks. I don’t think that there is a rational defense to that argument based on the facts in front of us. If UK played UC and lost to them repeatedly, that would be one thing. But their lofty ranking at the moment is almost completely built on sand.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 30, 2009 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I only have one argument with that Tru......if you are in business and
you cannot sell your product within 200 miles of your location, you simply expand your radius……after researching it I understand there are no top flight players in Kentucky….so we make our radius bigger….and bigger…..until we get to those players….I know nothing about Cincy and their road to the Top 25, and I also dont know that they are any better than we are, but if we are equals as teams, and they are in the top 10 and we are unranked, something is wrong…..
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on Sep 30, 2009 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
All I can say is ...
… that is much more difficult for a team like UK to do than it is for most of the teams we play. Just a fact.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 30, 2009 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Expanding your catchment radius may work in basketball...
But not in football. Colin Cowherd was talking about this on ESPN radio a couple weeks back. Basically, recruits stay home more often than not in football. The evidence for this is abundant. Look at teams with a national following like Ohio State and Penn State that are located in the midwest/northeast… even they get the vast majority of their talent from their geographical region.
It sounds great to say “Well go to Texas and recruit them!” but its not that easy. In basketball we can grab players repeatedly from Modesto, CA or other far flung areas. In football, the numbers don’t bear that out.
Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."
by chirop1 on Sep 30, 2009 4:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ok......so someone tell me why......
why does it matter if they play football or basketball when it comes to getting them to attend your school????
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on Sep 30, 2009 7:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not sure
But that’s what the numbers say.
It may have something to do with the shear volume of players on a football team. When you only have 13 guys you can put on a team, you probably have a bit more of a luxury of going abroad to collect them.
The other side of things are factors that have already been brought up. Better weather allowing for year long practice schedules in the developmental youth leagues. You name it. Whatever the reason is, the fact is that football schools get their players locally.
Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."
by chirop1 on Oct 1, 2009 5:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can't believe there are still people furthering
this Cincinnati notion. Replace UK and Cincy in their respective conferences and they’ll be right where we are now. Most absurd argument amongst all the other absurdity I’ve sifted through all week.
"The IQ of a mob is the IQ of its most stupid member divided by the number of mobsters." --Terry Pratchett
by Ontherocks on Sep 30, 2009 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think it is defensible, either.
I hesitate to call it absurd, but if you look at the facts, I don’t see how anyone can actually defend it that way.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 30, 2009 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agree.
UC’s got a good team, but those guys would be cellar dwellers if they played an SEC schedule.
Anything but Gatorade - yet another SEC sports blog
by Anything but Gatorade on Sep 30, 2009 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually UC Occasionally Plays (And Even Beats) SEC Teams
Under Brian Kelly, they beat some very good football teams.
My point is that hiring Kelly has taken a moribund UC program to a higher level. Big East is surely tougher than C-USA in football.
Kelly recruits some of the best Cincy HS players now. Before he arrived, that was rare.
by FortyYearCatFan on Sep 30, 2009 5:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well how about that.
Actually UC Occasionally Plays (And Even Beats) SEC Teams
So does UK
My point is that hiring Kelly has taken a moribund UC program to a higher level.
Replace Kelly with Brooks and UC with UK and the same sentence is true. What have you proven?
"The IQ of a mob is the IQ of its most stupid member divided by the number of mobsters." --Terry Pratchett
by Ontherocks on Sep 30, 2009 6:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hire The Right Coach
You proved it for me.
Hire the right guy and your program takes off to new heights.
by FortyYearCatFan on Oct 1, 2009 7:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Please list the quality wins Kentucky has in their own division in the Brooks era.
It will have one entry
Georgia
by ParisGuy on Oct 1, 2009 11:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That list
is a lot shorter if you exclude Brooks and include the Mumme and Curry eras. If you define “quality wins” as wins against UT, Florida, and Georgia, well, you’ve got two wins over Georgia in 1990 and 1996 and that. Is. It.
Anything but Gatorade - yet another SEC sports blog
by Anything but Gatorade on Oct 1, 2009 5:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 














