NBA: Oklahoma City and Washington need shooting guards this year!
While I believe Detroit and Atlanta have very good shooting guards, I think that Oklahoma City and/or Washington could be looking at players like Jodie Meeks for some much needed offense next year.
This causes a dilemma. It is one thing to say something like, "if I am drafted in the second round, I will go back to college.", but it is another thing to realize that a team that drafts you in the second round may not be able to afford to lose you to next year's draft. In essence, then, a second round draft could have a "guaranteed" contract, abeit at a reduced amount from what first round or lottery picks would command. So the dilemma is: do I go now for less money, hone my skills in the NBA and get better and then command a salary increase. Or do I wait a year, hone my skills in the college game, become an All-American and become a lottery pick next year.
Since the NBA is a business, let's look at how perception influences how athletes are paid. Like politics, name recognition is everything. You get that recognition by dominating the opponents at your same position. On several championship teams there have been examples of excellent relatively unknown players who have been instrumental to assisting a team in reaching a chamionship title. These players are way underpaid relative to the stars and unfortunately stay that way. The stars of the NBA continue to get paid large sums, with major endorsements and every year new "lottery" picks are brought into the league in the hopes of becoming new "stars". Nevertheless, a great deal of the rebounding, assists, defense and yes scoring are contributed by a group of unsung heros who really don't get paid well in comparison to "the stars". It would be interesting to examine the pay of players who score over 20 pt. a game or maybe average a double/double, but are not regularly considered "a star".
The college scene is, of course, not as financially as attractive. You do get a degree and a chance to develop your name recognition. Winning the national tournament is the goal of every team, because in college, teams can beat great individual effort. Injuries can occur. However, being successful head to head with the nation's finest increases your name recognition nationwide. The media cannot ignore you and the NBA scouts will want you. Now you are in the driver's seat , because you are a lottery pick. Based on your previous performance the pros are willing to invest in you.
I fully expect either Washington or Oklahoma City to try to convince Jodie to stay in the draft. They need him, but they don't want to give up a first round draft pick to get him. They want to "guarantee" him a second round pick and a "guaranteed" contract. I believe it will be a substantial amount of money, but I also believe that as businessmen, they see Jodie as one of the unnamed players that help you win a championship and will always pay him accordingly.
In the final analysis, all Jodie has to offer this year are the skills he currently has. Accepting a contract too soon could mean money, but also being lost in the crowd of NBA players who never get recognition, financially or otherwise. I hope Jodie comes back to Kentucky and enters next year's draft with star status.
0 recs |
16 comments
Comments
Too Small
Of the Top 10 SG’s in NBA draft (Meeks isn’t one) only #10 Jerel McNeil of Marquette is as small (6-3) as Jodie.
"[T]he opinion which gives to the judges the right to decide what laws are constitutional and what not, not only for themselves, in their, own sphere of action, but for the Legislature and Executive also in their spheres, would make the Judiciary a despotic branch."
--Thomas Jefferson, letter to Abigail Adams, 11 September 1804
by Wild Weasel on Jun 1, 2009 8:13 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree, that his height is an issue, but
Jodie’s smarts, speed and strength more than compensate. There is no question in my mind that Jodie is, at this point in his career, a NBA-quality player. He is an outstanding physical specimen who can really score. My point is that at what level will he be able to produce. Will he be a backup player or a star?
In the open court, on a steal, Jodie has displayed very good speed. If he gets a step on you, it is hard to catch him. He has also shown very good strength in taking the ball to the hoop. He makes the shot in contact and then kills you at the free throw line.
Jodie’s decision making on the court last year was not as good as I thought it should have been. I believe he thought that he had to score, because a third option after Patterson was not always there. In my opinion, Jodie became a bit of a “gunner”. Developing numbers in steals, rebounds, assists and lack of turnovers are also indicators of a high basketball IQ.
This last point is Jodie’s achilles heel. At this point in his career, he must develop a better handle. With better control of the ball, he will actually become even faster, stronger and will be able to do things he cannot presently do.
WW , you are correct, what Jodie will face in the NBA will be a lot of 6’7" guard/forwards that he will have to get around to get off his shot. He will not be shooting over them. He must get around them. To have security in the NBA, Jodie needs to be a star and learn to leave these guys in the dust. If that happens, we all know he can score.
An interesting point is that when Jodie Meeks came to Kentucky he was described as a combo-guard with a high basketball IQ. If he were to develop his ball handling skills in the DDMO, wouldn’t be something if he were drafted and played in the NBA as a point guard? Now there is a place where a 6’3" fast player with a great basketball IQ can excel. Playing against Wall and Bledsoe in practice could actually be better for Jodie’s development than playing on a Pro team next year.
by Blueobsessed on Jun 2, 2009 7:44 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jodie returning to UK should
help him improve his game dramatically, under the DDMO. By going through the camps, he has a better idea of what the NBA scouts are looking for. That is where Jodie always has benefited. When someone suggests he needs to work in a certain area, he does it.
Although everyone thinks next year’s draft will have more talent than this year’s, we do not know. It is only a perspective. Things do change, dependent on things that cannot be perceived by anyone. Jodie is a smart guy, and he will do what is best. :-)
Blue, there is no other color to Bleed !!!
by a2d2 on Jun 1, 2009 8:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Jodie Measured 6-4 In Shoes
Basketball players all play in shoes.
by FortyYearCatFan on Jun 2, 2009 11:23 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Forty, that is classic! Whether Jodie is 6'3" bare foot or 6"4" in shoes, he still is Jodie.
And yes, he will always play in his shoes. One inch makes very little difference. I simply made the point that several teams are playing 6’7" Guard/Forwards at the SG position. Now that is three inches difference and many times these players are extremely long.
The 76ers do have smaller SGs and Jodie might get on there. I honestly think he will be offerred a contract. I am wary of the $750,000 ones. They say, “I don’t think you are worth a million and I need all the extra cash I have for my stars, so I will try to get a bargain with you”. This type of attitude may mean that the perception of a player’s game is that it will never be at star level and they will never get top dollar even if they help win a championship. The NBA is a business and be wary of teams that are unwilling to invest in you. Go back to college and make them fight over you next year.
by Blueobsessed on Jun 2, 2009 8:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
LOL.... Blueobsessed,
I read 40’s comment this morning, but it must have been early, or the simple fact of 40 and #‘s seem to always go together. HaHa. I really didn’t notice that it really is a very odd “stat”, if you will. Thanks for the LOL. :-)
Blue, there is no other color to Bleed !!!
by a2d2 on Jun 2, 2009 8:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
6-3 Or 6-4 Are Both "Small" For SG In NBA BUT
Ben Gordon is shorter than Meeks and he does well for the Bulls at SG.
by FortyYearCatFan on Jun 3, 2009 6:48 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Meeks Metrics
Top 10 in running vertical leap — although considerably further down in standing vertical.
Top 5 in sprint speed — faster than Tywonne Lawson.
However note his projected draft position: 44.
"[T]he opinion which gives to the judges the right to decide what laws are constitutional and what not, not only for themselves, in their, own sphere of action, but for the Legislature and Executive also in their spheres, would make the Judiciary a despotic branch."
--Thomas Jefferson, letter to Abigail Adams, 11 September 1804
by Wild Weasel on Jun 2, 2009 11:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Thans for the link Wild Weasel
I am not keeping up with NBA draft stats, in fact, I do not follow the NBA a lot. I do from time to time, watch a former CAT play occasionally. That is about it, concerning my NBA habits.
Looking at what they have listed for Jodie’s weaknesses, looks to me like all could become strengths in the DDMO. Maybe all but his size, but that is a minor technicality from my point of view. He is a very hard worker and definitely one very fast guy.
I would love to see Jodie come back and recognized on Senior day next year, not to mention also finish his education. But I also hope he does what is right for Jodie. He will know what to do. He is a smart kid.
:-)
Blue, there is no other color to Bleed !!!
by a2d2 on Jun 3, 2009 9:45 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
WW thanks again! Hope this year Jodie stays at #44. Wouldn't be fun to see:
PG: Wall, Bledsoe
SG: Meeks, Hood
SF: Miller, Dodson
PF: Patterson, Pilgrim
C: Cousins, Orton
There is a lot of youth, but also a great deal of talent. They will be amazingly quick, big for their positions, really strong under the basket and good shooters. Let them loose to run everyone in the ground.
by Blueobsessed on Jun 3, 2009 3:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Harris SF, Stevenson PF
I think they’d get some of the PT away from Dodson and Pilgrim.
by FortyYearCatFan on Jun 3, 2009 5:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe. The team will need senior leadership, but IMO the superathletes
will win more PT than the experienced seniors, except for Meeks. Dotson and Miller are no longer Freshmen and unless the DDMO really matches Harris’ and Stevenson’s style, I see them as third stringers on this team. That is something when you relegate one of your best defensive players and a four star senior who is a shot blocking machine to the third string. Unless these guys can become part of the team concept, I don’t see much PT for them.
by Blueobsessed on Jun 3, 2009 7:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Harris For Defense, Stevenson Too
Stevenson MAY redshirt, though.
by FortyYearCatFan on Jun 3, 2009 9:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What a neat idea! Given that PAtterson and Cousins and Orton IMO will be
hot NBA commodities next year, redshirting and building up the strength/weight of Stevenson would be imperative. This would be a good year to do that. I certainly hope the year of practice due to the transfer rule helped Matt Pilgrim.
by Blueobsessed on Jun 4, 2009 7:46 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Redshirts HELPED UK In The 1990's
Travis Ford redshirted in 1990-91. Jeff Brassow redshirted in 1991-92. Mark Pope redshirted in 1993-94. Derek Anderson redshirted in 1994-95. Jeff Sheppard and Heshimu Evans redshirted in 1996-97.
That REALLY helped UK excel throughout the 1990’s.
Only Patrick Sparks redshirted (2003-04) in the 2000’s.
by FortyYearCatFan on Jun 4, 2009 10:12 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It might be good to redshirt Josh Harrellson as well if he makes the cut. I don't know about
Liggins and Galloway. Time will tell.
by Blueobsessed on Jun 4, 2009 4:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 













