University of Kentucky or Calipari/DDMO U?
For today's top-tier male basketball players I'm sure there are dozens, if not literally hundreds of deciding factors that go into choosing a school, but for the sake of this discussion, I just want to go over which one of the above options might potentially weigh the heaviest on the shoulders of today's male basketball youth and how UK might possibly be perceived by today's top recruits at this moment in time.
Recently, in my Internet travels, I came across an interesting comment in an SI piece written by Luke Winn. The comment was made by CJ Henry while his brother was being recruited and the following quote got me thinking about what goes on in the mind of a top rated high school player when considering what school to choose. I realize that the Henry's both opted for KU anyway, and this really isn't about the Henry's specifically, but rather what they represent. Here, Henry compares Memphis with Kentucky, and the last sentence is what ultimately made me ask myself about how UK is perceived as of late:
"Kentucky doesn't have the same 'oomph' to it that Memphis did. There's more tradition at Kentucky, but what [Calipari] was building at Memphis was different. Whereas every coach views Kentucky as a major upgrade over Memphis, not every player feels the same way".
Now, I realize that CJ Henry is just one college kid and his opinion is by no means the opinion of all high school or other college players out there, but the above quote did bring to mind that his brother, Xavier, also publically mentioned Kentucky tradition and he made reference to the fact that he really didn't know much about it. Maybe this is a just a Henry family thing and it's much ado about nothing and the majority of all aspiring-to-be-NBA-bound young men think like we UK fans do -- that this is the University of Kentucky and with its outstanding fans and great basketball tradition it is to be revered?
Out of the two options listed in the title, I immediately wanted to choose "University of Kentucky" as I'm quite the sucker for tradition and I respect it immensely and more than I can articulate here, but then I thought about it some more and the fact that I now live in a place where Kentucky basketball really isn't all that big of a deal (yes, I know, the horror, right?) but, it is a reality, people. Outside the state of Kentucky the world does not revolve around UK's great tradition (or college basketball, for that matter) and so, taking that into account, the little voice in the back of my head unfortunately said, "no", it's probably not the name on the University that is drawing the players right now. By countless potential recruits' own admissions, Coach Cal as well as the offense he chooses to use is ridiculously popular with the high school players of today (not to mention it's all the rage with us and the topic of our discussions these days, too) and it certainly doesn't hurt our chances of enticing the nation's top talent and as evidenced by one of Patrick Patterson's recent comments that he also finds the DDMO fascinating and it's one of the reasons he's excited about returning, it appears that the DDMO is quite appealing to our current roster members as well.
Even though I am a very proud UK fan, I would have to say that the perception among the young recruits is probably not that UK is the beginning and the end-all of college basketball at this moment in time, but rather that Coach Cal and his DDMO is actually the main force pulling the recruits in, and to be honest, that possible perception, if it is in fact reality for today's top recruits, well, it really doesn't bother me all that much, because quite frankly, until UK regains some of its luster, it would seem that we need the top rated players more than they need the University of Kentucky, and if the DDMO is what they want, and it will eventually lead to a change on how we are perceived by some, such as the Henry's, well, I'm OK with that.
So, after abandoning my UK homer mindset for a few moments so I could think rationally -- at this moment in time my choice on how we are most likely perceived by college basketball recruits today is Calipari/DDMO U. As time marches on, hopefully it's just a matter of us winning some games, winning some conference championships, making some deep runs into the NCAA tourney and then getting some kids into the NBA, and once again the Kentucky brand will be back and we will have that "oomph" the kids are looking for and the answer to the title question of "University of Kentucky or Calipari/DDMO U?" will without a doubt be the University of Kentucky -- because after all, that's the answer that the UK homer in me wants and the answer my heart prefers.
Just for fun, I will pose the question in poll format:
0 recs |
136 comments
|
Comments
I'd say 90% of the time players select coaches to play for ...
… and to be honest that doesn’t bother me in the least.
But, it does make one wonder what the Henry’s were thinking — They’ll play for Cal at Memphis, but not UK?
by Ken Howlett on May 9, 2009 8:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Completely...
agree on the 90%. Players want coaches and offenses that suit their style of play. I would say that the other 10%’s decisions come mostly from historical prestige and/or who they were fans of growing up.
The Spork, I'm two things in one.
by the spork on May 9, 2009 8:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was rushed when I left the above comment, so I thought I would add ...
… as spork writes; the other 10% I think consider prestige, and I also think that geographical location comes into play for some players.
by Ken Howlett on May 9, 2009 10:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Henry's Parents are KU grads
and KU was closer to their home.
by Fortunatus on May 10, 2009 8:09 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I knew his parents went to KU.
But they were originally going to Memphis. If Memphis, why not UK?
I suppose it’s very possible that Memphis and Kansas were Xavier’s final two choices coming out of HS. He probably liked Bill Self quite a bit, and it’s not like Kansas has sucked over the last few years … if I remember right, they just beat Memphis in the Title game a few years ago.
by Ken Howlett on May 10, 2009 11:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mom saw another opportunity.
This time she beat out Coach Cal, haha.
by BBallSophist on May 10, 2009 11:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with Ken....
Not only the Coach, but they look hard at wins and losses, and don’t kid yourself, 30 win seasons stick in the kid’s decisions also.
by UK1972 on May 9, 2009 8:22 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I voted Cal/DDMO U.
Before Cal came, we had a decent class brought in by an excellent and relentless recruiter – Orton (Rivals #22), Hood (#40), and Vilarino (3*).
Now Cal’s here (excellent and relentless, as well), and although we lose Vilarino (doesn’t seem so upsetting now, does it?), we gain Cousins (#2), Bledsoe (#23), Dodson (4* JCT w/ 3 years of eligibility left), and are still in the running for Wall (do I have to say it?). This crop wasn’t going to come to Kentucky until Calipari took the job.
I would love to say it’s the tradition that brings these kids here, but I feel certain that most of these kids only know that UK possesses tradition, and not the substance of that tradition. Some of these kids were…9 years old when Tubby started. It’s definitely the coach and offense that brought the new guys in.
by mrmondaynite on May 9, 2009 8:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Gillispie Was A Disappointment As A Recruiter
Even more disappointing than his coaching.
by FortyYearCatFan on May 9, 2009 9:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I...
think he did a fine job recruiting. I would like to see what Gillispie’s recruiting classes were ranked nationally, I’d bet they aren’t any worse than most of Tubby’s years.
The Spork, I'm two things in one.
by the spork on May 9, 2009 9:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rankings
Top 5 classes in 1998 and 1999. Top 10 classes in 2000 and 2001.
Top 15 classes in 2002 and 2006. Top 20 class in 2003.
- class in 2004 but NR class in 2005. Not uncommon for NR class to follow #1 class – 1971 and 1972, 1984 and 1985, 1988 and 1989, 1992 and 1993 are other examples at UK.
Top 15 class in 2007, Top 20 class in 2008, Top 15 class in 2009 (until Calipari made it #1).
by FortyYearCatFan on May 10, 2009 7:31 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's #1 Class in 2004
Not 1. class in 2004.
by FortyYearCatFan on May 10, 2009 7:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not...
much difference in most of Tubby’s years and Gillispie’s.
The Spork, I'm two things in one.
by the spork on May 10, 2009 4:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pure BS
Gillispie’s BEST year was <<< than Tubby’s worst year.
Pure 100% BS to the core.
by FortyYearCatFan on May 10, 2009 6:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Specifically
Williams had 7 more W in 4 years than Tubby.
Williams had 30 more W in 2 years than Gillispie.
Facts never lie.
by FortyYearCatFan on May 10, 2009 6:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm...
talking about recruiting class rankings, not wins and losses.
The Spork, I'm two things in one.
by the spork on May 10, 2009 6:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
OK
Tubby had (generally) better recruiting rankings than Gillispie, too.
by FortyYearCatFan on May 10, 2009 7:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Given...
the small sample size from Gillispie’s years, I think its hard to say that Tubby is a better recruiter.
The Spork, I'm two things in one.
by the spork on May 10, 2009 7:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Given the small sample size of G's classes
It’s clear that Tubby was a better recruiter.
I find your logic a little backwards.
DEEETROIT BASKETBALLL!!!
by davw83 on May 10, 2009 8:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I find the whole discussion
amusing, enlightening and entertaining. Thanks for all of your efforts and persistance.
by hoboat33 on May 10, 2009 9:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I...
don’t see what you’re saying. Because he was only here a short time he isn’t a good recruiter? He wasn’t fired because of his recruiting.
The Spork, I'm two things in one.
by the spork on May 10, 2009 9:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No one said he was
All im saying is that becuase he was here such a short time there is no evidence to prove he was a better recruiter than Tubby Smith.
Based on his future commits lined up, (the vast majority of them werent good enough to play at UK) and based on the fact that practically every player he brought in this season didnt see the floor nearly as much as Tubby holdovers the likes of Michael PorterI think its clear that Tubby was a better recruiter.
G did indeed come here with an reputation of being this awesome recruiter and he did have a couple of really nice players lined up but overall I feel like he underperformed in this dept. no one however said that he was fired because of this.
DEEETROIT BASKETBALLL!!!
by davw83 on May 11, 2009 9:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
G
I agree with forty. He had a few good players on the way in but for the most part the types of kids he was recruiting didnt seem like UK material to me. He certainly didnt uphold this reputation of an amazing recruiter.
DEEETROIT BASKETBALLL!!!
by davw83 on May 9, 2009 9:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
orton and hood were signed by BCG
and the point guard cal let go was a 4 or 5 star….but we have no idea how it would have turned out
anyway, all that is moot – i believe we all prefer how it is looking now….
only one rule in my house - uk has to be your favorite college bball team
by memphis wildcat on May 9, 2009 11:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Vilarino, Tucker
Neither was 4* or 5* recruit.
More like 2* or 3* recruits.
by FortyYearCatFan on May 10, 2009 7:33 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
MY OPINION
I have not thought of Kentucky being seen as having “oomph” since the Pitino era.
Stats, facts, whatever – that is my opinion. I have not been really “excited” since then – barring the NC in 1998 ofcourse, but I have my won opinions about that as well.
It is not worth an intelligent man’s time to be in the majority. By definition, there are already enough people to do that.
by kentuckygirl0724 on May 10, 2009 11:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Too Bad You Missed The 2003-04-05 Teams
- ranked team in the nation (2003). Overall #1 seed in NCAA (2004). #2 seed that just missed (2 OT) Final 4.
by FortyYearCatFan on May 11, 2009 8:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yep
Too bad.
It is not worth an intelligent man’s time to be in the majority. By definition, there are already enough people to do that.
by kentuckygirl0724 on May 11, 2009 9:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That was one of my favorite UK teams of all time.
That Michigan State game is an all time classic, even if it was a loss.
Envy our past......Fear our future
by btcoop71 on May 12, 2009 9:25 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hood
For players to decide on UK for tradition, our in state recruits, such as John Hood, who grew up the tradition, understand what is behind UK basketball.
by UK1972 on May 9, 2009 8:30 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Tradition
I remember Pitino saying when he was here that tradition to the modern high school player was who played on ESPN last Saturday night.
by duganboy on May 9, 2009 8:35 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
agree but also depends on the kid.
bledsoe mentioned the uk tradition – or at least wanting to come to a school where basketball was THE sport.
I do believe the type ball played has an impact (one of the reasons i believe tubby began to have less success recruiting). Cal’s recruiting at memphis was good, but did not take off until the DDMO was implemented…
add Cal/DDMO with UK tradition and SEC/BCS league and it is a very tough combination to beat. now the wins have to come to cement the deal…….
only one rule in my house - uk has to be your favorite college bball team
by memphis wildcat on May 9, 2009 8:41 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think it falls somewhere in between...
Live Uk1972 said about Jon Hood, he came for the tradition…. but you can bet that most non-Kentucky recruits don’t know a whole lot about UK tradition… they were probably eight or so the last time we were a perennial national powerhouse. They are definitely coming for the coach. I think it takes a special coach to realize that you need both types… you need the super athlete using the program as a vehicle to the NBA and you need the Kentucky boy to let him know what the program means to the millions of us fans along the way. IMO, That’s when it becomes special. Every Jamal Mashburn or Antoine Walker needs a Travis Ford or an Anthony Epps and vice versa.
I need a Sea of Blue because I am surrounded by Tennessee orange!
by sleepytimetea on May 9, 2009 8:44 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Coach Cal and the DDMO! No Question!
the kids in the class of 09 where between 6 & 8 years old the the last time uk won the nc. these kids grew up with tubby as the uk coach. hes a descent coach who can keep u in the middle of the pack, but he belonged at a school that is happy with being in the middle. uk strives to be at the very top. tubby had a couple good recruiting classes, but alot of mediocre ones as well, and there in lies the problem. todays recruits grew up watching uk settle for mediocrity with players and playing style. they r simply too young to remember pitino’s uk teams. they don’t remember uk basketball being exciting to watch and contending for and winning nc’s like they were in the late 90s. what these kids do see is calipari’s ddmo and the freedom and success in it, both in college and as preparation for the next level. its faced paced and exciting, much like pitino’s uk teams of the 90s. the ddmo really does unleash these guys, more so than any other offense ive ever seen, and it’s up to coach cal to rebuild the uk brand just as tubby destroyed it from what pitino created. it just makes u wish there was no such thing as the new jersey nets and maybe we couldve made this hire a long time ago. i wasn’t a fan of tubby and i didnt like the idea of grabbing gillespie from a&m, but i have no problem putting my trust in coach cal, and in time he will rebuild uk basketball into his own image with his expectations and when we get it right, we will be 1 seeds and winning nc’s. then these kids will see uk as uk again, and maybe follow that tradition. Go Cats!
by ksanders7 on May 9, 2009 8:53 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
LMAO...
get ready for the recruiting class rankings for the last 10 years.
The Spork, I'm two things in one.
by the spork on May 9, 2009 8:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Calipari Is A Superior Recruiter To Any UK Coach BUT Joe Hall
Look above for recruiting class rankings, if you wish.
by FortyYearCatFan on May 10, 2009 7:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I...
never said Cal wasn’t.
The Spork, I'm two things in one.
by the spork on May 10, 2009 4:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I Answered Yours, Too
See above for recruiting rankings.
by FortyYearCatFan on May 10, 2009 6:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
shouldn't the countdown begin with 40.....
only one rule in my house - uk has to be your favorite college bball team
by memphis wildcat on May 9, 2009 11:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
LOL hobo
couldn’t have said that better
Blue, there is no other color to Bleed !!!
by a2d2 on May 10, 2009 11:18 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Some things
are just as predictible as the sunrise.
by hoboat33 on May 10, 2009 9:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Now That I Read Your Post In Its Entirety
I can see how completely absurd it is.
It is UK “fans” like you who give the fanbase its lousy reputation nationally.
by FortyYearCatFan on May 10, 2009 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Our tradition
has suffered the last 10 yrs…call it the coaches, call it the players, call it whatever you like, but when the tradition is not living up to the hype, it takes a coach that can deliver something to the players that they want. I REALLY don’t care which gets us back to the top, just so long as we get there.
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on May 9, 2009 8:59 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
recruiting classes last 10 tears I mean years
i seen that list the other day. #1 last time in 04 and did nothing with it. then he followed it up with a class that wasn’t even ranked. thats like donovan winning back to back titles and following it up with back to back nit’s. i look for coach cal to keep us at the top of recruiting classes for years to come. he’s not even finished with this years #1 and he’s all over some of the top recruits for next year. these kids have to see that this is the start of something special in uk. take what it was at memphis in the cusa hardly ever on tv, now flip it to uk one of the most storied programs in the ncaa, in the sec, one of the toughest conferences in the ncaa, with a huge contract that puts every single game on tv. its gonna b like calipari on hgc or something. cause now these kids have every reason to wanna go play for cal at uk. the only problem is gonna b the scholarship limit. go cats!
by ksanders7 on May 9, 2009 9:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
#1 Classes At UK Often Followed By NR Classes
- in 1971, NR in 1972.
- in 1984, NR in 1985.
- in 1988, NR in 1989.
- in 1992, NR in 1993.
- in 2004, NR in 2005.
by FortyYearCatFan on May 10, 2009 7:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Again #1 Classes All Those Years
Not 1. classes all those years.
by FortyYearCatFan on May 10, 2009 7:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think tradition helps, but resent results from a coach matter much more
As others mention above, a coach is going to do far, far more to get someone ready to play professionally (NBA or overseas) than a school choice will. By that I mean, picking between Calipari and Pitino will have a far greater impact on a player’s chance to play professionally than the choice between UK and Louisville will.
There’s certainly a benefit to playing for UK over a school such as EKU for instance, because at UK you’ll be on tv more, play against better competition, and get talked about more in media circles. That helps keep a player in the sights and minds of NBA teams and scouts. It’s not impossible for that to happen at EKU of course, it’s just harder. But once you make that small school-big school leap there’s not a lot of difference between going to UK and Kansas or even UK and South Carolina – the scouts are going to see you either way. At that point the choice of a coach becomes much more important.
I like important stuff just as much as the next guy, but please, for a little while, deliver us from meaning, baseball. That's your greatest glory, and we thank you for it very, very much. -- Craig Calcaterra
by JLeverenz on May 9, 2009 9:12 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Tradtion
Another point about UK tradition. There have been many players who came to UK not knowing about the storied history, and the passion, but by the time they left Lexington, they knew what it really meant to wear the uniform. Why do you think Cal is talking to past players about becoming involved again. He knows how much having their passion for program around will mean to the new players, who will tell their friends coming along, who will tell… That’s how we get the best of the best again. I think a game between players from the past, and the current players would be great.
by UK1972 on May 9, 2009 9:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
What's Hot, What's Not
One of Calipari’s most accurate and relevant comments came when he proclaimed the need to rebuild the UK brand. It was no accident that the marketing major-cum-basketball coach chose that particular term because in today’s multi-media dominated and choice-ladened society a brand neglected is a brand soon forgotten. And when you’re speaking of marketing to millennials (the generation born 1977-1998 including those of recruitable talent and age) the constant and ubiquitous presence of brand is ultimately important. Much has to do with the attention span — consistently shrinking — of the millennials, one need only look at fads and celebrities and how fast they appear then languish and evanesce. Gives a whole new meaning to:
‘Brightest stars burn quickest, rest in peace’
Point is that the UK brand was allowed to languish for a decade or more, fade from minds of those to whom tradition means little and it was replaced by more marketing savvy, talent focused (hot, if you will) programs and coaches. But as so often happens with warp speed change and millisecond attention spans the opportunity for regeneration comes around more often. So it is with the arrival of John Calipari at UK: He’s hot and provides the spark to reignite the mere smoldering embers of what was. That he is the flame attracting the most athletic moths is obvious, it’s the responsibility of us fans to fuel it.
by Wild Weasel on May 9, 2009 10:22 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
UK Brand Didn't Languish For A Decade Or More
That’s (flat out) absurd.
UK struggled in 2006 and 2007 then fell off the map in 2008 and 2009.
Thankfully Barnhart and Todd fixed (fired) the problem and Pratt solved it.
by FortyYearCatFan on May 10, 2009 7:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We may not have languished 40
but we sure slipped….last 5 years were worst….but to not acheive another final 4 in Tubby’s time here was a definite disappointment. As I said above, I dont know if that was due to players, or coaches, or both, but we fell significantly from Tubby’s 1st year.
Now, I dont necessarily subscribe to the theory that Tubby won with Rick’s players, but he did not win a championship without them. And to not have at least challenged for one with the recruiting classes you described above seems to me to be CLOSE to languishing, depending on your definition of the term.
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on May 10, 2009 9:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Last 4 Years, Sure
1998 – 2005, no.
1 NC, 4 Elite 8, 6 Sweet 16 in 8 years.
UK surely challenged for NC in both 2003 and 2005.
by FortyYearCatFan on May 10, 2009 9:04 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'll say this much,
if you graphed out the 10 years Tubby was here, you will see the arrow pointing significantly downward in terms of tournament success. And I think Calipari said it best, “They only hang championship banners in here”. Did our lead in all-time wins diminish during his tenure?
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on May 10, 2009 9:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not So
Up and down. 6 W, 3 W, 1 W, 2 W, 2 W, 3 W, 1 W, 3 W, 1 W, 1 W.
The answer to your last ? is no. UK extended its all-time W lead from 1998 through 2007.
Gillispie gave back 30 W to UNC in the past 2 years.
by FortyYearCatFan on May 10, 2009 9:22 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
C'mon 40
if you start with 6 wins in the tournament…..you end with 1….and you have no number higher than 3 in the middle…..thats headed downward…..I didnt realize the Gillispie drop off was that much in 2 yrs. That’s giving up a season in 2 yrs……WAY too much.
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on May 10, 2009 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Give It Up, Folks
Considering by his own witness that he can detect “from the moon” Smith bias, any discourse with FortyYearCatFan regarding the Smith years is an exercise in futility. On the subject he is confirmation bias personnified.
Confirmation bias refers to a type of selective thinking whereby one tends to notice and to look for what confirms one’s beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts one’s beliefs.
by Wild Weasel on May 10, 2009 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have NO Smith bias
I feel like Tubby was a good coach….not an EXCELLENT coach. He did a good job with the players he had. I FEEL like a BIG number of his recruits underperformed. Unfortunately, that also goes back to how you coach.
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on May 10, 2009 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
UK Was Up And Down In NCAA Results From 1998 Through 2007
6 W in 1998.
3 W in 1999. Down
1 W in 2000. Down.
2 W in 2001. Up.
2 W in 2002. Flat.
3 W in 2003. Up.
1 W in 2004. Down.
3 W in 2005. Up.
1 W in 2006. Down.
1 W in 2007. Flat.
3 Up, 4 Down, 2 Flat = Up and Down.
by FortyYearCatFan on May 10, 2009 6:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was speaking in terms of
the starting and finishing points….you actually made my point on Pitino as well, started with 3 wins in 1992, finished with 6 & 5 win seasons in 96 and 97. You can claim up and down all you want, but on a chart graph you see that the little line points in a general direction. Use the history of the stock market if you like….corrections along the way, up and down years, but as of today, the market has improved since the 1930’s.
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on May 10, 2009 7:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Up And Down
Both coaches had ups and downs.
Facts show that starkly.
by FortyYearCatFan on May 11, 2009 8:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Starting Point ??
No coach is going to have a positive trend (“improving the team over time”) if he wins the national championship his first year. This should go without saying, it seems.
I just can’t get over how many times people really seem to believe that by not maintaining national championships (or even final fours) every single year, Tubby proved he was a bad coach. Ridiculous.
John Calipari should seriously consider not trying to win a championship in his first season. He will never be successful again in the eyes of this fan base.
by Gobe Igbloo on May 13, 2009 1:41 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Calipari
I think he has a CHANCE to win NC in 2010 if Wall signs with UK.
And a few more chances over the next 10 years.
Recent UK coaches had multiple chances, too.
by FortyYearCatFan on May 14, 2009 6:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Up And Down
Pitino.
3 W in 1992. 4 W in 1993. 1 W in 1994. 3 W in 1995. 6 W in 1996. 5 W in 1997.
Up and down.
by FortyYearCatFan on May 10, 2009 6:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
UK vs UNC
I think Roy Williams has as a big role in this too. Since becoming UNC’s coach (2003), Williams won more games at UNC than BCG and Tubby won at Kentucky. North Carolina has won more games in the last two seasons than in any other two year period in their history.
by Thomas Hunt Morgan on May 10, 2009 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Williams Began Coaching At UNC In 2004 Season, Not 2003
And UK lost most of its lead under Gillispie (30 fewer W) in 2008 and 2009.
by FortyYearCatFan on May 10, 2009 6:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Actual Numbers
Williams had 7 more W than Tubby in 4 years (2004 thru 2007).
Williams had 30 more W than Gillispie in 2 years (2008 and 2009).
by FortyYearCatFan on May 10, 2009 6:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Unfair.
Williams’ most prolific years were the last two.
Tubby also benefited by competing against the over matched Matt Doherety.
by Thomas Hunt Morgan on May 10, 2009 8:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You should also note...
in the last three years Tubby was -15. His last one was -9.
by atom on May 10, 2009 8:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Simple Math
UNC had 7 more W under Williams (2004 thru 2007) than UK under Tubby.
Your spin is quite evident of something else.
by FortyYearCatFan on May 11, 2009 8:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
On the contrary...
you are the one spinning…
UK extended its all-time W lead from 1998 through 2007
It was misleading to include Tubby’s last three years since he “gave back” during that time.
FWIW, I’m a Tubby fan and have greatly enjoyed reading your posts on this site including your numerous stat posts. I generally don’t question your stat posts but this one seemed a little off. Being a Tubby fan I have no reason to “spin” other than wanting to trust your stats rather than question them.
by atom on May 11, 2009 11:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
MY OPINION
If Gillispie had stayed his results would have ended up being equal to or greater than Tubby’s. (Greater than, in my personal opinion)
It is not worth an intelligent man’s time to be in the majority. By definition, there are already enough people to do that.
by kentuckygirl0724 on May 10, 2009 11:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Third.
40 has sure all of a sudden become super-critical of Gillispie.
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
--O.W.
by blbskue on May 11, 2009 8:07 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gillispie Is A Bum
Had he stayed, 6 or 7 UK players would have transferred this offseason.
He’s a bum. He never belonged at UK. He’ll never do Diddly Squat at high Div I level of basketball.
by FortyYearCatFan on May 11, 2009 8:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You come across as much the same.
Seems all you’ve done with your life is memorize a bunch of useless information, spin it the way you see fit, and insult people.
I feel certain Gillispie is a better man than you will ever be.
(I know this is probably out of line, but I am SO SICK OF THIS SHIT.) Really – Forty can just call Gillispie names and make insult after insult??? Well, I’m sorry, but I plan to say my piece as well then. I have had to read post after endless freaking post defending Tubby SMith and not at EVERY TURN Forty insults and condems and is no just out-right name calling.
Forty – you are a crotchety old jerk. I’m sure you are a miserable human being.
It is not worth an intelligent man’s time to be in the majority. By definition, there are already enough people to do that.
by kentuckygirl0724 on May 11, 2009 9:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I want...
…to extend my thanks to you as well, kentuckygirl. Seems you have taken a bite and thoroughly swallowed what Forty was casting.
I sympathize with your feelings on Gillispie, believe me, I really do. But, you must be careful that you don’t turn into what you dislike most about Forty………someone who abandons manners and reason to defend a prior UK coach.
by BigSkyCat on May 11, 2009 9:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So sorry to disappoint you, BSC
however, the big difference is that forty has been doing this crap for two years now. I am a human being and have said nothing for about as long as I can. A
It is not worth an intelligent man’s time to be in the majority. By definition, there are already enough people to do that.
by kentuckygirl0724 on May 11, 2009 9:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
P.S
I really didnt mean for that subject line to come across as bitchy as it sounds after reading it again.
It is not worth an intelligent man’s time to be in the majority. By definition, there are already enough people to do that.
by kentuckygirl0724 on May 11, 2009 10:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
kentuckygirl
I hid his comments about that but I guess Big Sky wanted to allow them in defense of her comment to him.
Anyway, this needs to stop. It only divides the members here and we don’t need that. Forty crossed the line in hijacking this post and even the rules of ASOB.
by kykat51 on May 11, 2009 9:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It ALWAYS happens.
It is not worth an intelligent man’s time to be in the majority. By definition, there are already enough people to do that.
by kentuckygirl0724 on May 11, 2009 9:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Coach G
Everyone knows at times Forty and I do not see eye to eye but I dont really understand your all’s continues defense of G.
Results on the court aside I think it’s pretty credible and proven that the man treats his players like trash. Things that I believe to be true (and I am a fairly discerning individual) lead me to actively dislike this man. He treats people like absolute trash and I cannot understand your continued support of the man. I think the UK administration has been pretty clear about his deficiencies. IF he had stayed we would have lost over half the team and it’s very likely that Pat and Jodie would both be gone as well. Im glad a change has been made and will support Forty on this one.
DEEETROIT BASKETBALLL!!!
by davw83 on May 11, 2009 9:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Its not even that.
I totally get that the majority of people dont care for BCG – my husband, friends, co-workers included. I respect that. My thing is that each and every time someone mentiones Gillispie – or even Tubby too a lot of the time – Forty just comes out swinging. I mean – you dont like him – got it, but is it really necessary to make a negative comment just about every single time the man’s name is mentioned.
Now, I admit. I am totally embarrassed that I had a little “fit” on whatever thread it was, but I guess I was just like, “Damn, enough already” by the time I got to the he’s-a-bum-that-will-never-succeed-in-division-I-basketball comment. I do regret that I reated so childishly. I have been staying away some just due to this type of thing, but really have missed posting with everyone and come back and find its just more of the same. I just got frustrated.
I really dont care who likes GIllispie and who doesnt. I just dont get the “attacks” I guess.
It is not worth an intelligent man’s time to be in the majority. By definition, there are already enough people to do that.
by kentuckygirl0724 on May 11, 2009 10:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tink
I too have distaste for the Coach G bashing. That is something that Tru put in his updated guidelines fot this blog. It upsets many of us who were his supporters. It divides the commenters here and creates an atmosphere I despise. Hopefully Forty will desist from further bashing as he is the only one I have seen do this. I know many did not Coach G but they, on this site, have not resorted to what Forty has done recently.
by kykat51 on May 12, 2009 12:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Did not like
Missed a word in my post.
by kykat51 on May 12, 2009 12:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This ...
… is a violation of the community guidelines. Please don’t call people names.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on May 12, 2009 6:57 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Feel better?
I hope so, because this post accomplished nothing, just makes you look bad. Just ignore him if you don’t like what he posts. There are several people on here I ignore, don’t let people get to you.
Envy our past......Fear our future
by btcoop71 on May 12, 2009 9:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Forty ...
… that is out of line. You may not call UK coaches bums, EVER, on this blog. It is deliberately provocative and obviously wrong. If you want to post this opinion of Gillispie, then do it elsewhere.
I will not warn you on this again. You have been bashing Gillispie every chance you get, and you take exception every time someone mentions Smith in even the most obscurely negative light. You are guilty of becoming exactly what you claimed to dislike. You know better, and I want this line of attack stopped here, now, and forever.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on May 12, 2009 6:56 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Poppa Vilarino: Cal Will Be Sorry
GJ’s dad speaks his mind:
“The bottom line is somebody tells you basically, in a nice way, you’re not good enough, frankly,” said Gerry Vilarino, the player’s father. “You can sugarcoat it all you want. That’s basically what he was saying. … It’s never good to hear that or feel that.”
If a few players lose scholarships we’re likely to hear from other disgruntled dads — and moms.
by Wild Weasel on May 9, 2009 10:31 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i agree
i want to say that its a quality problem but that seems a bit insensitive.
however, it is probably better to say it now to the kid than have the disgruntled dads/moms complain about playing time – or lack of it………and maybe i am sugar coating it, but GJ should be a fine player in a system more suited to his talent.
only one rule in my house - uk has to be your favorite college bball team
by memphis wildcat on May 9, 2009 11:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If I am not mistaken, the word was that
Calipari told Vilarino that he didnt fit the SYSTEM. Now I don’t know if this means he isn’t good enough, or he just wasn’t the right kind of guard. I DO know that GJ Vilarino is not the top rated guard in his class, and I would bet that Calipari wants the top rated guard in his class. I may be wrong, and I will admit it if it is so, but I believe that this year’s recruiting shows that this man knows more about recruiting than BCG may ever be able to learn. The biggest thing being to play a style of ball that the kids want to play, for a coach that they want to play for.
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on May 10, 2009 9:12 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tradition
I feel that UK tradition has been shaped by excellent coaches. Compared to the UNCs and UCLAs, UK has had less talent (when judged by the eventual NBA careers of the players) but has consistently won as well as or more than those other schools.
Instead, I feel that the UK tradition has been to have innovative or excellent coaches.
Coaches know about this and want to coach here. That in turn brings the players.
I voted for Calipari U – though I think both answers to the poll are essentially the same in that the latter (the coach) creates the former (the winning tradition).
by schizm42 on May 9, 2009 11:48 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I Voted For Calipari U Also
Recruits generally play for coaches, not schools.
by FortyYearCatFan on May 10, 2009 8:11 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Varies by recruit
I voted Cal-U as well … but I think Hood would play for UK no matter who was coaching … Cousins and I hope eventually Wall will come becaus of Cal and the offense.
by ukcris on May 10, 2009 8:48 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's what's in the minds of kids.
As frightening as it is, that is the critical point BigSkyCat makes. And the way kids think seems to have changed drastically over the past 20 or so years. Or perhaps the greatest change has been in those who influence what kids are thinking.
Thirty years ago, I suspect the biggest influences on a prospect was his/her parents, high school coach and high school friends. In this environment, a school’s tradition was a huge plus because parents and coaches knew the tradition.
With the emergence of the summer AAU circuit and the various all-star games, the dynamics have changed. The top players get to know each other and talk about the hottest schools the same way they talk about their favorite music. AAU coaches play the up-tempo game that is “fun” for the kids. How many times have we heard players say in the past few years, “I just want to have fun”?
Kentucky’s previous coaches and recruiters didn’t adapt to this change quickly enough or effectively enough. Cal did — maybe more effectively than any other coach.
by Fortunatus on May 10, 2009 8:47 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Right now it is Calipari
If things play out as we expect, a few years down the road UK/Calipari will be one and the same. One factor influencing kids is the NBA. Add several of the current Cats to the UK alumni in the NBA and the UK brand will be back with a vengence.
by jpbluekat on May 10, 2009 8:56 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
one time
the KENTUCKY name sold the kids but after tubby and billy it will take a few year where the name sells the kids again. when i was in the service in the 60s and 70s when asked where i was from and i said kentucky the next words out of there mouth was the home of the wildcats. still traveling around the country it not that way now. i want it back to where the name KENTUCKY WILDCATS sells not the man.
by massaccatfan on May 10, 2009 9:56 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Hasn't Been That Way Since Rupp In The 1950's
Hall and Sutton used Lincoln, Hamilton, and Grant as recruiting assistants.
Pitino used his NBA connections.
There is no reason to use Tubby and Billy (Gillispie) in the same sentence.
One won 76% of his UK games, averaged 26+ W at UK, and had considerable NCAA success.
The other won 60% of his UK games, averaged 20 W at UK, and had no postseason success.
by FortyYearCatFan on May 10, 2009 10:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not to start an argument (this is the first and only point I'll make here)
but one of those guys inherited a team that went 35-5 the previous year and was NCAA Runner-Up, and coached at UK 10 years. The other inherited a 22-12 team that was an 8 seed in the tournament the previous year, and only coached 2 years.
I also HEAVILY favor Tubby over Gillispie, as you clearly do, but you have to admit the “table was set” for Tubby to succeed, whereas Gillispie had a lot of “damage control” to oversee.
by mrmondaynite on May 10, 2009 10:10 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So basically,
I’m not arguing that Gillispie does belong in the same sentence in Tubby. What I’m saying is that your reasons for saying that they don’t belong together are unfair.
by mrmondaynite on May 10, 2009 10:12 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
They Do Not Belong REMOTELY In The Same Sentence
One had considerable success at UK. The other had NONE.
The “inherited” 35-5 team lost 4 players – 2 NBA lottery picks, two 4 year starters – in 1997. They were replaced by a NR (Not Ranked) recruiting class in which UK missed ALL of its top targets.
That was 2 straight years (1996 and 1997) of heavy losses to NBA draft and NR recruiting classes to replace them.
Hardly was the table set for success. UK recruiters landed back-2-back Top 5 classes in 1998 and 1999 to restock the talent levels at Kentucky.
by FortyYearCatFan on May 10, 2009 10:16 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You must admit, however,
That BCG’s two seasons were similar to Tubby’s last two. Tubby won 44 games, Gillispie 40. Tubby lost 25, Gillispie 27. Tubby won 18 SEC games, BCG 20. Tubby has two NCAA tournament wins in two appearances. Gillispie had no NCAA tourney wins in one appearance.
You might give a slight edge to Smith, but those seasons weren’t dramatically different.
by Thomas Hunt Morgan on May 10, 2009 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So, Ignore 8 Seasons And Count Only The Last 2???
OK, still Tubby > Gillispie.
Even if just those 2 years.
by FortyYearCatFan on May 10, 2009 6:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not by much if at all
I know Forty is Forty but cant you see that your argument is rediculous. Tubby was clearly a superior coach to Gillespie.
DEEETROIT BASKETBALLL!!!
by davw83 on May 10, 2009 8:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just referring to Tubby's last two years only.
The final two seasons were similar to what was seen from Gillispie
by Thomas Hunt Morgan on May 10, 2009 9:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Arbitrary
Picking Tubby’s last two season to compare to G is completely arbitrary and doesnt give an accurate account of Tubby’s career. It’s extremely difficult to compare two such very different tenures and you cant really do it successfully.
Billy G may have been as successfull as Tubby (we cant ever know) but I feel like based on everything that was happening in the last season, the expected mass exodus by players if G stayed, and the poor 2010 class ( with the exception of D. Ferg) the next few years would have been very rough indeed.
DEEETROIT BASKETBALLL!!!
by davw83 on May 11, 2009 9:14 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
These Idiots Have To Ignore Tubby's First 8 Yeard
Otherwise they can’t perpetuate their Tubby Sucks mantra.
There’s another factor at work here.
by FortyYearCatFan on May 11, 2009 8:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sigh.
Thank you, Forty, for turning this thread into something ugly. I can’t even express how grateful I am.
It’s truly great to know that you have the utmost respect for people, the words they write, and the real point of those words. : (
by BigSkyCat on May 11, 2009 8:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Forty ...
… I will remind you that no matter what you think, implying racism to fellow members is not acceptable behavior. If you think someone has made a racist comment, email me and I will deal with them. You may not imply that others are racist, bigoted, or racially biased. I won’t tolerate it.
You must allow others to prefer one coach over the other without suggesting that it is racially motivated. You may defend Smith with facts, but you may not defend him by suggesting that a preference for another coach is either idiotic or racially motivated. I shouldn’t have to tell you this.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on May 12, 2009 7:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That is just as fair
as only having two seasons to compare to 10. Gillispie could have ended up being just as good – or better – than Smith. No way to tell what could have been. It is completely unfair to judge this way as one had considerably more time to accomplish things. It is my OPINION that had Gillispie been given 10 years, we would have had at least a final four appearence.
It is not worth an intelligent man’s time to be in the majority. By definition, there are already enough people to do that.
by kentuckygirl0724 on May 10, 2009 11:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree.
It was Forty that led to “Tubby-bashing” being a banned subject. Well, I’m going to ask, respectfully, Forty, that you STOP the Gillispie bashing.
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
--O.W.
by blbskue on May 11, 2009 8:09 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
40-I'm going to ask
that YOU stop all the Gillispie bashing.
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
--O.W.
by blbskue on May 11, 2009 8:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He's A Bum
Pure and simple. Never belonged at UK. WAY, WAY over his head at UK level.
by FortyYearCatFan on May 11, 2009 8:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Stop it Forty!
I am tired of your Coach G bashing. End it now and I hope to never see it again on this site.
by kykat51 on May 11, 2009 9:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
FORTY
IS ABSOLUTELY RUINING THIS SITE.
It is not worth an intelligent man’s time to be in the majority. By definition, there are already enough people to do that.
by kentuckygirl0724 on May 11, 2009 9:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Doesn't matter why they come.
All that matters is that when they leave, they will bleed blue and they will add to the tradition and legacy.
Xbox Live Gamertag: hoopchi
by hoopchi on May 10, 2009 10:11 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
BigSkyCat
that is really hard to vote on. Deep down I want to say it is the tradition. But speaking of now, I think it is the coach. I think a “team” having the want and the determination to give UK all they had is over. The Unforgettables had that. They still have it. I would be surprised if we ever see a team with that. Now we occasionally see a player with those insights, but that is becoming more rare.
So I guess, when you look at the times that are changing within these young guys minds, It would have to be for the coach and that coaches style of play. The guys today are looking beyond college toward the NBA. That is a big goal and they should be commended for pursuing their dreams. Times are different than they were, without a doubt. Hopefully, some of that tradition will be woven back in. If little by little. Because this is the University of Kentucky and we know what it means. Not just a jersey or a coach. Tradition is still here. Let’s not erase it now. :-)
Blue, there is no other color to Bleed !!!
by a2d2 on May 10, 2009 11:43 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
forgot to add,
I still think the fan base and the excitement we have still lures a lot of players too…
Blue, there is no other color to Bleed !!!
by a2d2 on May 10, 2009 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Another P.S.
I am not sure if this has even been discussed since April 1st, but I for one really hope that Coach Cal gets this, as he says he does. I can only remember him talking about tradition on that first day. If he has continued to bring it up, it has gotten mixed in with all my other excitement. I hope that is my case. I really would like for him not only to teach his DDMO but, a little history pep talk now and then, can’t hurt. Maybe some of that will come when they walk into Memorial or Rupp with Wildcat on their chest and the feeling then, becomes. I pray…..
Blue, there is no other color to Bleed !!!
by a2d2 on May 10, 2009 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The conference matters too
In recent years ACC and Big East schools have snared a lion’s share of high school all-Americas. The elite kids who play against each other in AAU and all-star games seem to want to continue the competiton in college (and the NBA). They all want to go against the best, which in their minds is each other. In recent years, this desire and TV coverage has favored the ACC and Big East. The contract with ESPN should help the SEC. The coach, the style, the tradition and better TV should keep us at the top for a few years.
by Fortunatus on May 10, 2009 1:58 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Another Calipari As Pied Piper Comment
As one might empathize Memphis folks have a hard time letting go. From Commercial-Appeal:
Don’t be too hard on new Memphis basketball coach Josh Pastner for getting beat at every turn by his old boss John Calipari. Thanks to recruiting Derrick Rose and Tyreke Evans the past couple of years, elite high school guards know if they have to go to college for at least one year, they want to sign with the man who can showcase their talent to the point that they can be an NBA lottery pick. Every great high school player wants that Pied Piper and that guy is Cal.
by Wild Weasel on May 10, 2009 3:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
DDMO and Cal
Why in the Hell are we talking about BG and Tubby?BigSky brought up a simple point,and the new direction of the program.Yet, we see AGENDA posting,TUBBY eruptions, and Stalking of new posters.I have only been on this site 2 years,and I get sick and tired of the Tubby rants on this MB.Cal will lead us to the promiseland.
by -Zoso- on May 10, 2009 8:15 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yes, back...
to the question at hand. Put me in the:
“The tradition gets the coach (”This is Kentucky!" – Calipari); the coach gets the recruits" camp. So, ultimately, tradition gets the recruit…they just don’t realize it at the time : )
by atom on May 10, 2009 10:15 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
A reminder to all ...
… about my policy regarding Tubby Eruptions. Kentucky coaching debates in general are becoming very divisive — my advice is to avoid them and stay on topic.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on May 11, 2009 7:09 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Why not
set aside a fanpost for “Coaching Debates”?
by hoboat33 on May 11, 2009 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No fanpost for bashing of previous coaches
I am vehemently opposed to that suggestion hoboat, sorry.
I have heard enough over the last few days to last me a lifetime.
Look at Tru’s “reminder to all” above.
by kykat51 on May 11, 2009 9:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
223-56 Over The Next 8 Years
And he’s TIED with him.
That would be 28-7 average (almost 80%) to get there.
by FortyYearCatFan on May 11, 2009 8:47 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Here we go again
Who gives a rat’s ass about Tubby Smith?Forty,all you do is to try to hijack every thread,and revise history.This thread was originally about the DDMO,and you think this about YOU.BigSkyCat ,Sorry to ruin your post.
by -Zoso- on May 11, 2009 9:05 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
FortyYear...
We have all seen this so many times. It gets very old.
Just enjoy the new era of UK basketball and forget the Coaches of the past. Can you do that??
by kykat51 on May 11, 2009 9:05 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Very Pleased With Calipari
Who wouldn’t be?
by FortyYearCatFan on May 12, 2009 5:51 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 
















