John Calipari -- Myth, Legend and Fact -- Part II
In the first part of this series, we began looking at the list of bullet points sports journalists seem to mention whenever they talk about John Calipari as an indictment of his coaching career, and reasons why the UK-Calipari marriage is destined to fail in a blizzard of NCAA investigations. The first article in the series examined the infamous Marcus Camby incident at the University of Massachusetts. In this second part, we will look at another one on the list -- William Wesley.
If you haven't heard of him, let me tell you a little about Wesley. William Wesley, AKA "Worldwide Wes" is one of the more interesting figures roaming the wasteland between top amateur basketball talent and the NBA. We all have heard horror stories about the street agents (like the ones responsible for Camby's woes) and the other hangers-on that tend to surround these talented young NBA aspirants that populate the elite ranks of high school and prep school basketball. Wesley plays in that same sandbox, and is a long time friend of John Calipari, which is why he raises so many concerns.
You will see Wesley variously described as a mentor, a confidant, an adviser, and "uncle", a power broker, a "runner," and many other variations on that theme. What you will not see him described as is an agent, because that is not what he does. In fact, one of the reasons that William Wesley draws such suspiciousness is that nobody really knows exactly what he does, or more importantantly, who pays him.
Wesley clearly has influence among many of the NBA's superstars, including LeBron James, Allen Iverson and Michael Jordan just to name a few, but that is only the beginning of his reach. GQ Magazine did a famous piece on William Wesley entitled, "Is This the Most Powerful Man in Sports?" Wesley's official job is a mortgage broker, but his intimate involvement with the biggest names in the NBA both on and off the court, the shoe companies and the AAU circuit that make Wesley such an obvious source of concern for many.
The GQ author tried unsuccessfully to pierce the ambiguous veneer Wesley shrouds himself in, and few of the people who know him best were willing to discuss what he actually does. But one very interesting thing it does reveal is that Wesley got his start with Milt Wagner, former U of L basketball player and friend of Wesley from their days in Camden, NJ, along with Billy Thompson, who also went to Louisville. Wesley was an intimate part of the famous Louisville "Camden Connection" and Billy Thomson described him as " ... part of the team" when Louisville was at the final four in 1986. Milt Wagner got Wesley a meeting with Michael Jordan a few years later, and Jordan wound up giving him a job at one of his camps. That was the beginning of Worldwide Wes as we now know him.
The incident that got Calipari all the heat revolved around Milt Wagner's son, Dajuan. As you no doubt recall, Dajuan was the consensus best player in America coming out of high school in 2001, and was inclined to go directly into the NBA back before the NBA raised its age limit. Wesley persuaded Dajuan to go to college for a year or two, and knew Calipari well even before his days in the NBA at New Jersey. Wesley arranged a package deal for the younger Wagner and his friend, Arthur Barclay to go to Memphis. At the same time, Dejuan's father, Milt, who did not yet have a college degree, was offered the position of Director of Basketball Operations for Memphis, although Wesley's invovlement in that seems a little less clear, even though it looks obvious. The media assailed all this as moral turpitude cloaked in a thin veneer of "It isn't against the rules" legitimacy. The elder Wagner stayed in the position for six years, got his degree from Memphis, and is now an assistant coach at UTEP. They younger Wagner went on to the NBA after one year at Memphis.
Wesley was instrumental in helping Calipari recruit Derrick Rose to Memphis, and Tyreke Evans after him. How instrumental? We don't know, and probably never will. It isn't as if John Calipari could not recruit without Wesley. But Wesley's association with Calipari is many times an asset, and one of the things that set him apart from other coaches.
So who knows what Wesley does? Not NBA commissioner David Stern:
“Your story didn’t shed any light on it,” Stern said. “It was an interesting profile to see how one can be around and be influential and be open and above board.”
That's William Wesley -- open and above board. Nobody has dirt on this guy, not really. Nobody has anything bad to say about him except for competitors, or people who presume the worst. Does he profit from his associations by taking graft and kickbacks? I have no idea, but if so, nobody will say.
Ultimately, William Wesley seems to be very much like "Red" Redding (portrayed by Morgan Freeman in The Shawshank Redemption) -- Wesley is a guy who can get things. He can get you a meeting with Michael Jordan, or introduce you to Jay-Z or Beyoncé Knowles. But unlike Red, he doesn't take 20% -- or if he does, he gets it by some unknown mechanism.
So what does all this mean for Coach Cal? Well, William Wesley is, and has been, to put it in law enforcement parlance, a "person of interest" for the NCAA for some time. Because his dealings are so upfront but his agenda and motivation for what he does so opaque, you can't blame them for being suspicious and most of the rest of us for being curious. I am convinced Calipari has no intention of dissociating himself from Wesley, and even though there is no evidence of anything untoward vis-a-vis the NCAA rules, it is no surprise that some Kentucky fans are uncomfortable with an association that appears so byzantine and unclear and it will be the subject of derision from program and Calipari detractors from now until doomsday.
But the bottom line is, there doesn't seem to be anything in all this that smacks of an NCAA violation or that could run afoul of the rules. It is not against NCAA rules for Wesley to independently associate himself with NBA and high school players, as long as he isn't performing the actions of an agent, either directly or indirectly. It isn't an NCAA violation for Wesley to personally recommend a school or a coach to a recruit that he associates with, or who solicits his advice. Wesley doesn't even seem to recommend to all his talented "nephews" to work any one agent once they make the jump. Does it make one wonder what benefit he derrives from his actions? Yes, it does. Does that make them wrong? No, it doesn't.
Until William Wesley is implicated in some kind of scandal (and he has remained scandal-free despite many opportunities), I think that it might be just a little unfair to assume the worst. None of Wesley's friends or associates have ever turned on him, and loyalty is a quality that is difficult to come by in the rough-and-tumble land of the modern NBA. Perhaps William Wesley is exactly what he portrays himself to be -- a man who can get you in front of almost anyone among the NBA power elite, and not ask you for a single thing in return.
39 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
He doesn't ask for anything.
I have heard that line again and again about WWW. I think thats why he gets so much trust from the people he associates with.
Red
Ultimately, William Wesley seems to be very much like “Red” Redding (portrayed by Morgan Freeman in The Shawshank Redemption) — Wesley is a guy who can get things.
Red was in jail for murder…..just saying…..
Just messing with you Tru….
Envy our past......Fear our future
good read, thank you
where can I learn to write like you?
Thanks Tru....
I really enjoyed your post. I needed more information, and now I have it….And comparing him to “Red” only helped me that much more…
You know ASoB is my place for news….Much appreciated……oh, Fearless Leader….lol
Blue, there is no other color to Bleed !!!
One thought
His real estate business -
1) he may really enjoy his lifestyle and basketball
2) he may be a great scout of talent and have a gift for seeing the right kid married to the right coach to give that kid the best shot at the NBA
3) staying legal and clean and taking care to “spread the love” to many individuals will keep the access open
4) when the kids get to the draft and want to spend money, there are now plenty of ways for Wes to get paid as a friendly and connected advisor. Fully legal and out of the NCAA rule book. All he did was have fun and plant seeds for much later in a kid’s life.
I see “broker” types in many businesses operate like this. Real Estate is THE place to learn this skill. Plant many seeds today, do nobody wrong and when the time comes – PAID!
This is such a get paid now kind of culture that it seems odd to folks how he is not cashing checks for Evans going to UM – TODAY. He hasn’t and won’t. Might he run back into Evans a few years from now and ask him how his advice worked out for Mr. Evans? Might he ask if there is anything Mr. Evans may need? Might Mr. Evans say “You know, I am on the hunt for a new house” or “I wish I had a 1953 Vette” and BAM, Wes makes the hook-up and bird dogs some money.
Just my take on it. Happens every day.
Changing how you think will change what you think.
I had the same thought
A mortgage broker would benefit from having rich friends like NBA players. Either he helps them find mortgage money to buy a house (for a fee) or he helps them invest their millions (for a fee) in real estate mortgages. With hundreds of millions top pro players make, 5% here, 6% there, soon adds up to real money. And obviously the guy is a basketball junkie; he loves the game and the players.
Whatever the commodity, brokers are all about building relationships with people who have money.
"He may really enjoy his lifestyle and basketball"
Not unlike Mark Cuban. Isn’t that pretty much what Cuban did? Went to IU, loved basketball, invented Broadcast.com, sold it, suddenly found himself with a pot-load of money on his hands, and was like “You know what? I’ve got pot-load of money on my hands. I like basketball a lot. I live in Dallas, and the Mavericks really suck. I think I’ll buy the Mavericks, pay oodles of money to make them a good team, then enjoy myself some basketball.” This is perhaps not unlike what some of us would do if we had his kind of money.
Is this WWW’s sole motivation? I have no idea. I’m still kinda leery about the dude, if you want to know the truth. But it is at least plausible, and it seems we have at least one example where something similar has happened (i.e. a guy with lots of money just wants to be around basketball… a lot!)
You know Tru....this sounds
a lot like the “good ol’ boy” network we have down here where I live…..I send a referral to someone to do work for someone, they do it at a good price, the first someone brings business to me in return….a man has to eat…..I was always taught to do business with those who do business with me.
Sounds like the same principal…..just a LOT more zeroes…..lol
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
Similar, I guess.
It’s just networking, really, at a whole different level. There are people around town like this that I know. Need a guy to do your lawn? He knows one. Need a guy to do this or that? He knows several.
This may be the world’s second oldest occupation. :-)
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Glenn Logan on Apr 27, 2009 12:43 PM EDT up reply actions
I would much rather have WWW then booster scandals.
I think this is a perfect example of networking between people that understand the NBA as a business and kids who are business-savvy enough to know they need advice. However, as previous comments have suggested, I don’t believe he is taking money for it. It is pretty hard to not be caught for SOMETHING if you are under the watchful eye of an organization such as the NCAA. The way I see it, the more WWW is able to advise high-caliber recruits under investigation, the more I respect the man for being able to play the system.
I’m glad he’s friends with Calipari, but I don’t think that we have given Calipari enough credit for surrounding himself with influential people AND by being one of the best coaches for developing young talent for the NBA. You think a networking giant like WWW doesn’t know that Cal is a hell-of-a coach??? Of course he does, that’s how the relationship works. You scratch my back by recruiting the best kids and I’ll scratch your back by selling your program with former and current NBA players (who are also scratching my back) that I do business with. Pretty much the “good ol’ boy” network on a grander scale, for sure.
Is he really that mysterious?
It seems to me the hand-wringing by fans and media is due more to lack of information than anything specific.
As pointed out in the links provided, nobody has any real idea what Wes does, only that he is connected with every major player (in both senses of the word) in the world of basketball.
Given this unknown, media and fans fall back on the only characterization that fits this profile – the agent.
As in all careers, there are good agents and bad agents. There are agents that work within the framework of the rules and have the best interests of their clients in mind and agents that are simply out to make a quick and easy buck, but I think it is fair to say that as a group agents have a reputation that makes lawyers look like Peace Corp volunteers. Hence the negative perception of Wes.
I imagine the conversation goes something like this:
“Who is this World Wide Wes fellow?”
“I don’t know, but he hangs around basketball players and gives them advice about the NBA and where to go to school.”
“Basketball players, huh? Sounds like an agent”
“Well, he’s not an agent”
“But he does a lot of the things an agent does, right?”
“Well, yeah I suppose so.”
“Okay then, even if he’s not technically an agent he’s basically a de facto one. A rose by any other name and all that.”
I think it is tempting to read the stories, consider the connections he makes to players, coaches, shoe company execs, and ponder the lack of real information and come to the conclusion that Wes has something to hide or is involved in something shady. At the same time though, he’s under no obligation to share these kinds of details with the press or the public – certainly not under any more obligation than any of the readers and posters on ASoB (for instance).
While I don’t believe Wes’s actions are altruistic, I also don’t think they are sinister in intent. The most likely case is that he is what he appears to be: someone with a talent for connecting with people – especially high profile people – and someone who uses that network to benefit the people he knows which, as others above have wisely noted, is exactly how all such networks operate.
I like important stuff just as much as the next guy, but please, for a little while, deliver us from meaning, baseball. That's your greatest glory, and we thank you for it very, very much. -- Craig Calcaterra
My question to everyone is this....
Would we be giving the same rationalizations, explanations, anecdotes, and comments to describe this fellow if his name was associated with say, Rick Pitino, Bruce Pearl, Bill Self, or one of the 25 other big name coaches that DO NOT coach for us?
I dare say some of us might be looking a little harder at this man…..if only because we REALLY wanted to know if he was all that “rumors” say he is. Not implying anything except that we tend to be much more tolerant and acceptable of “our” people, and if he is very close to Coach Cal, he just became one of “our” people…..“de facto” as JL said above…
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
That's an excellent question ABC
And one that I have pondered myself as it regards my own feelings about Calipari since he’s been hired.
I can say that, for myself, I’ve never spent a single moment thinking about Wes. In fact, I would like to say I have never heard of him until Calipari took the UK job, but reading some of the articles Tru linked I realize that I must have encountered his name before, I just never remembered it or gave it much thought.
I have a feeling that if Calipari were still at Memphis and Tru were to write this same series, the reaction from posters would be quite different overall.
I like important stuff just as much as the next guy, but please, for a little while, deliver us from meaning, baseball. That's your greatest glory, and we thank you for it very, very much. -- Craig Calcaterra
Just sayin....
“Not implying anything except that we tend to be much more tolerant and acceptable of "our" people, and if he is very close to Coach Cal, he just became one of "our" people….."de facto" as JL said above…”
You seem to be implying a great deal. Guilty until proven innocent…or something like that. IF there was anything here….they would have been nailed to the NCAA cross long ago. Nothing here…move along.
Easy there Jay
Just bringing another point of view to the discussion…..I could care less who the guy was…..unless he was kicking our tails helping someone else…..then I’ll lead the pack of people screaming….just like a lot of others
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
Just curious Jay...
Do you think that Emory envelope thaqt popped open was the first and only time anything like that happened? Or is it possible that things like that had happened for years and no one had ever been caught doing it? Your above statement is a tad naive.
The quickest way to a man's heart is Chuck Norris' fist.
I think this is certainly a valid observation
I know that I have drudged up comments of mine from previous years as they concern Coach Cal and I have made comments that I thought something was fishy with WWW.
Tru makes valid points, but I think we all live in fear of the NCAA hammer around here and even the appearance of any inpropriety makes us wary.
Certainly if he were associated with another school, we’d be taking a different approach to it all.
Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."
Our S.O.B.
Brings to mind the rather famous quote from FDR referring to Anastasio Somoza, the then dictator of Nicaragua:
‘’He may be an S.O.B., but he’s our S.O.B.’’
Not inferring, mind you, anything of the sort referring to Calipari.
I thought that one was one of Gen. Patton's there WW
Glad I found out it wasn’t…..lol
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
Exactly the point I have made to several people regarding WWW.
It would be a different story if he was not on our side. I know from experience that guys who tiptoe between the raindrops eventually cause the rain to fall on somebody else. So far he has played within the rules, at least as far as the NCAA is concerned, but people who walk a fine line always step over that line eventually. It is just the natural of the human animal.
What bothers me is his demeanor toward those who want to know more about him. His comments to the GQ writer bordered on threatening IMO. At least his message was clear – “If I don’t like what you write, prepare for the consequences”. He wants to remain faceless to the vast majority of people in the sports world, but has appeared with the power players when it suits his purposes. He has total control over who gets a peek behind the curtain and exactly how much they get to see.
But my major concern is this – it has been alleged that he has ties to gambling, or more specifically, Las Vegas casinos and bookmakers. That scares the absolute hell out of me.
AAU teams, shoe companies, gamblers, rappers and elite athletes of all ages – it is an unseemly business. And if Kentucky gets drawn into another scandal, there will no longer be any question – we will go down in history as the dirtiest college basketball program of all time. I don’t think any of us ever want to revisit the late 80’s. And I don’t think our beloved program would ever recover.
The quickest way to a man's heart is Chuck Norris' fist.
All I know ...
… is that as long as he doesn’t violate NCAA rules and by extension implicate Kentucky, I don’t care who he is or what he does.
Sandy Bell will definitely be watching that relationship, to the extent it impacts UK. I really don’t have all that much concern, and Wesley seems to be liked by virtually everyone that knows him. That’s an amazing feat. His enemies all seem to be people like the press who keep trying with apparent futility to find out how he does his business.
Keeping the press in the dark doesn’t seem all that wrong to me.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
I don't know about that one Tru.....keeping the press in the dark can be tricky,
just ask Howard Hughes…..maybe thats a little extreme….but it seems to me that if the man wanted to avoid the spotlight he would simply stay away from the game all-together.
Maybe, he just wants to be close to the game and knows that he isn’t a player or coach, and the only way to do that is to stay involved with the kids. Maybe he has a chip on his shoulder about not having anything growing up, and he wants to see others do better…and maybe he is like a lot of us who feel that the NCAA is nothing more than a Neo-Nazi extremist group dressed up in sheep’s clothing, and he wants to stick it to them every chance he gets, and he has the jack to make it happen, I don’t know.
Our program and it’s people are no strangers to controversy, and I pray that you are right and that Sandy Bell has it under control, and I have said as much before. And I know I will seem like the angry lone nut on this one, I just think we had better be really careful to examine ALL sides of this one, just to be sure. As long as everything is Kosher….I’m cool.
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
We can not, no way whatsoever,
handle another scandal. That is fact. I think we have to strive to go down as the BEST college basketball program of all time. A few more things to work on, titles, and number of wins, and such. I have been reading all day about the long ago season of 1952-1953, and have learned a lot, I didn’t know. Plus this article about Wes, not a lot of music to my ears today. Though I found the article very interesting. I am still holding on to the good that will come out of this hire, for all involved.
Blue, there is no other color to Bleed !!!
If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck...
it must be a duck! From Duckland, Oregon
by blue oregon on Apr 27, 2009 11:11 PM EDT up reply actions
pretty contentious statement...
people who walk a fine line always step over that line eventually. It is just the natural of the human animal.
By no means is that true. In fact, I would say people who have walked a fine line for a long time almost never step over the figurative line.
Also, you know who else has walked a fine line with the NCAA for the past couple decades? Coach Cal
While I was speaking in generalities...
studies of criminal addictive thinking, thrill-seeking personalities, vicarious living and Type A personalities all show overwhelmingly that the longer a pattern of this type of behavior exists, the more the lines between acceptable and unacceptable blur. Power becomes an addiction and rationalizations are made. I am not in any way suggesting that WWW is a criminal. What I am saying is that his life as a power broker lends itself to toeing the line and occasionally stepping over that line to provide a service that helps him meet his obligations.
You can argue the points I made above if you want, but I have years of real-world, practical experience with individuals who exhibit this type of behavior and I have studied it indepth and up close. I have also read most of the clinical work done in this area for the past 20 years so I know what I’m talking about.
What is important to remember is WWW doesn’t have any stake in the University of Kentucky. Sandy Bell has no control over his actions, movements or relationships. And he has little to lose we get in hot water because he has made his name with NBA stars past and present.
The quickest way to a man's heart is Chuck Norris' fist.
www and C-Cal
The relationship between C-Cal and WWW is one that all of us UK fans will to wait and see on. Do we have an option? I will say this though. I must admit that I like Calipari much more from a personal standpoint then I thought I would. He seems much more genuine, and warm and friendly then I expected. I loved Pitino when he was here, and was both brokenhearted and glad to see him go! We knew he was going, it was just a matter of when. After three years of his flirting with leaving, I didn’t want to see him go, but I said “go on if your going”. He was never satisfied with being here, not completely. With C-Cal, he truly seems to be satisfied to be here. I thought he would be a lot like C-Pitino in the respect that he would be somewhat distant and removed. Like an outsider at heart. C-Cal already seems to have connected with the fan base in a personal way that Pitino never did. Calipari seems like one of the guys, even in the expensive suit and all. I will give him the benefit of the doubt on this one for now. I think he deserves this much.
kevin smith
by blubloodcatfan on Apr 27, 2009 11:20 PM EDT reply actions
You have to ask yourself..
…why would UK open the program up to curiosity and scrutiny with this hire?
These last two articles detailed the main reasons that UK and fans would have been better served with another hire. It’s heartening to read other posts that reflect my initial concern, when before I just got knee-jerked, overly sensitive, defensive rebuttals.
It may all work out fine….it may not. Good luck.
'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'
If you think about it ...
… it’s just a risk management exercise. UK feels confident that they can manage the risk, and the benefits are worth the effort.
I don’t think we will need much luck, just due diligence.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Agree entirely.
I’ve mentioned before that UK should be proud of their not too recent history of compliance and the process & commitment around it. I think it is true that UK stands a much better chance with it working out than an Oklahoma or USC (if I can be so ignorantly judgemental on these programs).
But given this, I personally chose not to go skydiving even though the pilot guarantees I’ll get the best chute and be taught by the best teacher…but maybe that’s just me.
'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'
I don't worry about Coach Calipari...
because he has everything to lose. I worry about WWW because he basically has nothing to lose. Everything he does for a player through high school and college can be accomplished through the back channels and being involved in a scandal might cramp his style for a bit but it wouldn’t end his career.
But none of us are without our skeletons. Just ask Pitino.
The quickest way to a man's heart is Chuck Norris' fist.
Better example is Cal & UMass.
It’s true that Cal was not penalized during the Camby ordeal. But it’s also true that a 3rd-party player caused havoc (re: WWW?), and UMass got slammed pretty hard.
I get the support of Cal. But it would be secondary to my support of the institution and basketball program. I would be careful in this regard.
'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'
Umass did not get punished.
They had to forfeit wins earned while Camby was ineligible, but they suffered no sanctions.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Wow...I guess we have a different definition of punishment.
Given UK’s proud defense and support of their numerous leading NCAA records, I don’t think that ‘sanction’ would be considered anything less than punishment and a pretty good slam.
'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'
Well, it depends on your perspective, I suppose.
Obviously, UMass is unhappy having it’s only Final Four converted into an asterisk, as well as numerous victories. But as unpleasant as that is, it is a far cry from NCAA probation and the attendant stigma, as well as the many other nasties like reduction in scholarships, etc. that inevitably accompany such an event.
UK knows pretty much what that is like, having the entire 1952-53 season and all the presumed wins that would have happened canceled, and a bizarre ruling by the NCAA that compelled Rupp not to compete in the post season in 1953-54.
But for those events, it is quite possible that UK would have at least two more final fours and quite possibly another championship. So I say we have a pretty good idea what that’s like.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
The WWW debate continues
And isn’t it interesting to see cardinal fans question anyone about integrity? That is like “political correctness”! It’s an oxymoron. The interesting thing there is how things have reversed over the years. When I was growing up, 35 years or so ago, I could get along better with most UL fans then UK fans. Sad but true. The majority of UK fans back then were rude and obnoxious, and more then a little embarressing. These days the opposite is true most times. Most UL fans now are barely tolerable. Just root for your team guys, and don’t hate us because we’re beautiful! (Or, so far ahead of you all in all the catagories) We finally have something to get excited about! It’s been almost 10 years since then! Forgive us if we are giddy. The thing I would worry about if I were a UL fan is the fact that you can pretty much kiss your coach good-bye in 3 years or less. He will never be able to handle this kind of competition. If he starts getting overshadow-ed by C-Cal, he’ll leave. Mark my words. He’ll wind up right where he started. At a small school somewhere that has never done anything. He can’t handle failure or second fiddle. You heard it here first.
kevin smith
by blubloodcatfan on Apr 30, 2009 10:19 PM EDT reply actions

by 











