Kentucky 57, LSU 68: Postmortem
Despite a strong effort, Kentucky fell to LSU today. Kentucky's leading scorers had all kinds of difficulty getting the ball int the basket, primarily due to the outstanding effort by the Tigers. I was really hopeful that Jodie could get Temple into foul trouble, but Temple played nearly flawless defense on Meeks and shut him down almost completely.
Congratulations to LSU on an amazing effort. I was concerned that two losses in a row might focus the minds of the Tigers, and sure enough, you would have to say it did. They were the fresher team the whole game, and even though UK gave a really strong effort, they just could not get the job done against a rested, determined and mature LSU team.
Obviously, I am very disappointed in the loss, but I find little to criticize from the coach. In general, his substitutions made sense, and the team played hard. The fact of the matters is, Kentucky just could not execute soundly against LSU's defense. I think the screening for Meeks was pretty weak today, which also contributed to his futility.
Further observations:
- Patrick Patterson may have had a double-double, but this was surely not his best game. He was too soft on offense, but he played pretty well defensively. He also played almost every minute of the game.
- The outrageous number of offensive rebounds in the first half negated an outstanding defensive effort in the last 10 minutes of the first stanza. That allowed LSU to stay ahead rather than about 10 points behind, and contributed directly to this loss.
- Ramon Harris just couldn't contain Thornton today. He was just too tough. Harris played good basketball all around, though, and I have a hard time being too critical of him. If there is any player on this team that gets the most out of his talent, it is Harris.
- Meeks just had one of those games, very greatly impeded by the fantastic defense by Garrett Temple. I think Meeks' teammates let him down by not setting better screens, but that has been a problem all year. This time, Jodie was unable to manufacture a way to score. Five turnovers and getting up only nine shots is just not going to win many games for this team.
- Micheal Porter played pretty well. He made some big shots, but also made some defensive mistakes. But overall, I thought he did about as well as he possibly could.
- Kevin Galloway had a fairly good game if you can ignore the outrageous turnover in his first minute or two and the fact he had zero assists. But he did ave four rebounds.
- LSU simply killed us on the glass. How did they do it? They were the fresher team, and that's where that stat showed up. UK was slow getting to the glass, and they were not strong with the basketball. LSU had 17 offensive rebounds vs. Kentucky's 8.
- LSU got up 16 more shots than UK. Ball game.
- UK's free throw shooting was loathsome for this team. I guess they were due to cool off from the line, and at the end of the year, they surely did.
- UK had 15 turnovers, but most of them happened in the first half and robbed UK of the opportunity to build up a lead in the last 10 minutes of that stanza. I feared that would come back to haunt the 'Cats, and it surely did.
- What the heck are the Raycom guys doing peddling rumors about Kentucky? Are they trying to win the National Inquirer Rumormonger of the Year Award, or what?
- Does it strike anyone as particularly onerous that announcers are referring to Gillispie as "embattled" after only two seasons at Kentucky? Might I also point out that both of those seasons were winning seasons? Un-Kentuckylike, yes, but for God's sake -- embattled??
I am very glad that this year is almost over. Honestly, if I have to listen to one more ridiculous rumor or outrageous comment about Kentucky, I may well lose my religion. I wish the media would just deal with reality as it is, and quit trying to give it more "character."
I hope Kentucky does well in the NIT, even though I hate having to play in that tournament with a purple passion. But even with that said, they are ball games we should try our level best to win. If we wind up somehow hanging an NIT banner in Rupp's Rafters in a 3am Monday morning ceremony, the least I can do is stand up and salute that effort. If we get beat early, it just means a merciful end to a miserable season for the Big Blue Nation.
I can live with that also.
251 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Sometimes you have to reach bottom
Luckily, at UK our bottom is a 20-win season and a high, maybe #1 seed, in the NIT.
As much as it sucks to not make the tournament, we have to put this into perspective with the rest on Div. 1. Most teams would be happy if the season we had were their best in 5 years, the fact that it is our worst says a lot.
We will come out of this season learning a great deal of lessons, and how the coach responds next year will speak to how much he does at this program. He has not had a great season, but neither have the majority of his players. Some of that is on BCG, but not all of it.
Have faith, this ship is going to turn around soon, and we will relish the success even more knowing the struggles that we have had.
Good comment.
I love people who will not let a bad season destroy their reason.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Porter Is Better At SG
And Liggins and Galloway were recruited at PG but didn’t get much PT as the season transpired.
Harris plays WF not PF. Stevenson (presumably Crawfish) was recruited HARD by current SEC champs LSU so presumably they would play him, too.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 14, 2009 9:57 AM EDT up reply actions
Jasper
If healthy, he starts at PG and plays 30 minutes PT.
No cupboard was empty in 2007. But the 2008 recruiting class is disappointing, that’s for sure.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 14, 2009 9:58 AM EDT up reply actions
Coaches Decide Who Plays
It’s a wonder to me why recruits like Miller, Galloway, Liggins, Harrellson, or D Williams weren’t on the floor more often.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 14, 2009 9:59 AM EDT up reply actions
Add Orton, Pilgrim, Hood, And PG Recruit
Mix and stir very well.
And you have a nice 25 to 30 W cocktail (maybe).
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 13, 2009 3:53 PM EDT reply actions
Please ...
… Please God.
Maybe the football team will be good next year, and we salve some of our wounds with some pigskin schadenfreude. :-)
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Unfortunately
with the way that the schedule worked out, we will have a tough time keeping the momentum up in the last half of the football season as well.
I don’t know what hubris we are paying for, but I really wish we could settle accounts and get back to some normalcy.
by aidanpryde18 on Mar 13, 2009 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions
Not enough running backs
For a season with no weeks off. We’re going to be airing it out a lot – I hope Hartline has been working on his throw.
Why?
It isn’t that long of a toss to throw a waterbottle to Morgan Newton during timeouts.
http://www.overthepylon.net
by OverThePylon on Mar 13, 2009 4:01 PM EDT up reply actions
Amen.
Totally agreed.
http://www.overthepylon.net
by OverThePylon on Mar 13, 2009 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions
A good cocktail is more than just the ingredients....
…it requires a good mixologist.
'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'
UK Has A Good Mixologist
He had the bouncers remove your mixologist from NCAA tourney in Rupp Arena back in 2007.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 14, 2009 11:10 AM EDT up reply actions
lol
I love when 40 brings the funny
by blue kentucky girl on Mar 14, 2009 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions
The bottom line...
This team is 20-12, which is an improvement over last year. When it gets down to it, you have Meeks (who can score 40 as easily as 10) and Patterson who is a rebounder, but not a natural 5 or a dominant inside big man, and three role players. If one of those 2 has an off night, then you’re relying on significantly reduced talent to step up monster big.
BCG has had two recruiting classes. Before people are ready to can him, let’s let him get his guys in and run the system he wants to run. Look at Michigan football… a drastic change in scheme without the talent to run it is sometimes a hard pill to swallow. At first.
http://www.overthepylon.net
Much softer schedule this year
Plus, 8-8 in the sec vs 12-4 last year.
This year wasn’t an improvement by any stretch. It’s a rebuilding year, let’s be honest…
But, that said, if at least Meeks comes back, we’ll be better next year. If Patrick stays true to his word and returns, then we’ll be much stronger.
I am really looking forward to seeing Pilgrim, Orton and Darius Miller next year. Go cats!
As we all should be.
Again, let’s let BCG get control of the team, get some of the old regime recruits out the door, and then we can make an evaluation. Remember when everyone wanted to fire Coach Brooks? He sure made all of us look like jackasses. BCG will do the same.
http://www.overthepylon.net
by OverThePylon on Mar 13, 2009 4:09 PM EDT up reply actions
Billy Has Never Coached A Team Of 100% His Recruits
His successor at TAMU got 25 W last year and 23 W this year out of such teams.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 13, 2009 4:10 PM EDT up reply actions
Rough Season, but things will change
Well, I missed much of the game due to traveling, but saw the last 13:00 minutes. UK needs to find some 3 point shooting, Meeks can not be the only go to guy. Miller has made some big steps in the last month. Playing in the NIT will be goof for him, as his game will continue to develop. I think he is a legitimate offensive threat next year. With Patterson coming back, I think Meeks will join him. Add the new guys, lots of seniors, and some maturity, and I really do feel this team can be great next year. A solid PG would be nice, does not need to be a big scorer, but take care of the ball and set up others playres. Also, we need a PG who can score in transition. So many times, Porter gets a push in transition, only to bring it out, a more athletic PG will be able to push the ball set guy up, and score some. I hope UK plays well in the NIT to get a little momentum for next year. I do think things will turn around.
Lane
Oh...
And the two years before BCG rolled into town, the Cats were 9-7 both years. This year, they were 8-8. Not that much of a difference. Overall wins? 22-13 and 22-12 compared to 20-12 this season. Again, not that much variance. And that’s ignoring the 12 SEC wins last year.
Is it excellence like we all want? No. But to call this year’s result horrid anything like that is short sighted and simply blind hatred for BCG. It’s hard to cook dinner when the chef before you left the kitchen a mess.
http://www.overthepylon.net
Deceptive figures....
Considering how talented the SEC was in the two years before “BCG rolled into town.”
But wait...
Talent shouldn’t matter. This is Kentucky. They trump everything. At least according to some.
http://www.overthepylon.net
by OverThePylon on Mar 13, 2009 4:05 PM EDT up reply actions
Just FYI
That’s clearly sarcasm.
But take out PPat and Meeks, and this team is not a talented, deep team. In fact, I would say we are AT BEST a middle of the pack SEC team without Meeks and Patterson. And most basketball people will tell you two good players does not a good team make.
http://www.overthepylon.net
by OverThePylon on Mar 13, 2009 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions
Our church league team
could set a acreen for Jodie.
There is nothing wrong that a string of W's wouldn't fix!
Thoughts
- Thornton was just terrific. It didn’t matter who was on him – he hit every kind of shot imaginable. Fadeaways, guys in his face, putbacks falling backwards – he hit them all.
- LSU did a much better job of slapping the ball away when guys tried to drive to the basket. That’s how they got their scoring going in the first half.
- Lots of silly decisions by everybody today – even Patterson. I’m amazed UK only had 15 turnovers. It would have been more, but they were the beneficiaries of a lot of lucky bounces in the second half.
- I mentioned in Ken’s game preview that it would be important for UK to not allow LSU to go off on threes, and for most of the game they did so. That flurry of 3’s late in the second half was what ultimately buried the Cats, IMO.
- Going player-by-player the FTs don’t look as bad as the overall percentage would suggest. Galloway and Harris were a combined 0-4 which is not surprising, but everybody else basically shot their season average (Patterson was 7-9, 77.8 %, Stevenson 3-4, 75 %, Meeks and Miller were each 2-2).
- Temple did a fantastic job guarding Meeks, but Jodie has been off on his 3pt shot. In his last 5 games Meeks is 6-32 on threes for 18.75%. The trend started with the regular season game against LSU. Is it possible that Temple got into his head so much in that game that it affected the rest of the season?
I like important stuff just as much as the next guy, but please, for a little while, deliver us from meaning, baseball. That's your greatest glory, and we thank you for it very, very much. -- Craig Calcaterra
1965 Team Was 15-10 (1966 Was 27-2)
1974 team was 13-13. 1975 was 26-5.
Lots of other examples. Most recently:
2002 team was 22-10. 2003 team was 32-4.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 13, 2009 4:09 PM EDT reply actions
On the NIT
2 things I will be looking for during the NIT game(s):
1) The development of the younger players – particularly Miller. I think the NIT is a great opportunity for some of these guys to take a significant step forward heading into next year.
2) The chance to get some more wins to pad the lead over North Carolina (ok, that one is only semi-serious).
I like important stuff just as much as the next guy, but please, for a little while, deliver us from meaning, baseball. That's your greatest glory, and we thank you for it very, very much. -- Craig Calcaterra
Geez, JL, why only semi-serious?
My son went to undergraduate school at UNC (and med school at Vandy). Based on the grief I could collect from him about either of those sources, the Race to 2000 is dead-serious at my house. 8-))
Actually, I hope to see a different starting lineup in the NIT. Everybody has been trashing Galloway recently, but his A/TO ratio is better than any of the other so-called guards on this team. And, he’s averaging an assist every six minutes or so before today’s game. I also think he’s the only player on the team who’s not afraid to dribble close to the defense. And, he’s the only one who won’t back away from a switch when he’s moving across a pick. I know he’s had some bad games recently, trying to force passes that weren’t there, but nobody else was able to pull this team together. At least he tried. Having only one year left may be too much “development deficit” to overcome, however.
No moral victories--it's all about Ws and Ls!!!
I would greatly love for UK to get to the 2000 win mark before UNC
As of today, UK is up to 1986 (good year) and UNC is at 1978. UK can win a max of 5 games the rest of the season (winning the NIT) while UNC can win a max of 8 (ACC and NCAA tournaments). At worst, both teams will enter next season tied, and more likely UK will have a 3-4 game lead.
I like UK’s chances to get to 2000 wins first, with or without any extra benefit from the NIT.
I like important stuff just as much as the next guy, but please, for a little while, deliver us from meaning, baseball. That's your greatest glory, and we thank you for it very, very much. -- Craig Calcaterra
Recruiting
Hey, anyone know the chances of UK landing PG Eric Bledsoe??
Lane
Won't Matter (Won't Qualify Academically, JuCo Bound)
I think based on what I’ve read.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 13, 2009 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions
Thanks
What about Darius Smith, and is the hype around him legitmate. Regarding Bledsoe, I am surprised Duke is after him if he has academic issues.
Lane
Smith Is #1 Senior In Illinois
Having a great season. Hard to read. I doubt UK will land him.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 13, 2009 10:04 PM EDT up reply actions
Bledsoe
was thought to be down to UK, Florida and UAB. But in an interview he said there are other schools still in the mix. Who knows?
I have never been more disappointed in a UK season than I am this season....
Not even during Sutton’s reign.
- First off I am accustomed to UK making the NCAA at a bare minimum. The NIT is unnacceptable IMO.
- I am used to UK teams building momentum throughout the season and playing their best basketball at the end of the year.
- I am used to UK teams finding that little something deep down to pull out close games and also coming from behind in the 2nd half when needed.
- I am used to coaching that is able to find the right buttons to push to get the most of the players and develop them into a better team at the end of season.
- I am used to Rupp Arena actually being a great home court advantage.
I didn’t really see any of the above.
Certainly there are excpetions to all these things and one can point to past teams but at the very least this team is talented enough to make the NCAA tournamant but they failed miserably the last 13 games. During the preseason I did not believe this team would win the SEC or make a Final Four run yet (even though they won 20 games) I still find the end result a FAIL.
Slower Traffic Keep Right!
So...
I take it you were furious between 1997 and 2006 for points 2,3, 4, and 5?
http://www.overthepylon.net
by OverThePylon on Mar 13, 2009 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm not going to be drawn into a Tubby bashing argument other than to say...
UK was better in all those areas during that time. No question about it.
Slower Traffic Keep Right!
1997 UK Made NC Game (Lost To Arizona)
1998 UK won NCAA title (over Utah).
I can’t imagine anyone furious about either season.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 13, 2009 4:22 PM EDT up reply actions
Sure, Y?
I’m just busy at work today.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 13, 2009 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions
I just wanted to hear it from you
When you tell me that there is not a chance in the world that we could get in the NCAA this year, I will give up my last hope. (yes, I know all the stats, too) but hope is sometimes hard to kill.
by StillCatwoman on Mar 13, 2009 4:47 PM EDT up reply actions
1% Chance
Depends on ZERO upsets in conference tourneys from here on.
99% chance UK will be NIT-ing.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 13, 2009 5:55 PM EDT up reply actions
okay, thanks
You tend to be clear headed about these things and I can’t always get my heart out of the thought process.
BUT since you say 1%, I won’t completely douse my hopes. I still believe this is a business driven world and the dollars and cents the Ky fan base brings to the table has to be in the back of the committee’s minds despite the fact that no one would admit to it.
by StillCatwoman on Mar 13, 2009 6:14 PM EDT up reply actions
1985, 1987, 2006
UK records worse those years but NCAA bid anyway.
UNLIKELY but still 1% chance, I think.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 13, 2009 6:18 PM EDT up reply actions
Talent
BCG has taken a lot of heat for this season’s blunders, but if you really look at what he has too look at it is not his fault. Yes, he does make some weird substitutions and all of the other stuff. For example, many people hate Porter. Who else does BG really have. Liggins and Galoway are like chickens with their heads cut off. Today in the game, Galloway turned the ball over on fastbreaks atleast threedifferent times. He had no where to go, he just was out of controll. KG is a decent rebounder and defensive player, but not a point guard. Liggins has so many attitude problems and his ability to grasp everything a point guard needs to is very very challenging for him. He has a lot of work to do this summer. Porter is the best point guard on this team right now. That is a fact. We have to live with that, atleast for a few nit games anyway. Porter tries hard and he has a big heart, but he is just not athletic enough to put UK where it needs to be. I hope that new kid ( Valerino) mispelled, coming next season is as good as everyone says he is. BG will have a really decent team next year if they stay, pp,jm. Those reporters today need to quit spreading the fire. They said that Miller might not be coming back next year. First I’ve heard of that. They need to focus on the game and leave speculation alone. It will be hard to watch uk mens team play in the Coliseum. I btter stop writing because that thought just pissed me off.
Yeah
Sounds like a barbershop. I live right outside of Louisville in Southern Indiana, so I have to hear it from the L’ville and Indiana fans. Of course I can look at one and say, 1-17 in the conference. Then I can look at the L’ville fans and say, according to the Bible, the devil will reign on earth for 1,000 years. That gives the Cards what, another 993 with Ricky Satan P at the helm?
I won't be sorry to see them play in the Coliseum.
There’s a lot of history there. Not, as some have said, “Where it all began.”, because you’d have to go 300 or so yards down the street to Alumni Gym to find that spot. Nevertheless, the Coliseum was home to the Hagans and Ramseys of the banned season, the NC team of ’58, the Runts, and the Issel teams. Not bad for an old building. I just hope someone points out all that history to these guys before they take the floor.
No moral victories--it's all about Ws and Ls!!!
A message on another blog
says UK might have to play on the road in NIT. Most teams seat more than Memorial and it is about $$$$.
There is nothing wrong that a string of W's wouldn't fix!
Anybody who rejects Memorial as an NIT venue
probably should be fired for incompetence.
NIT attendance 2008 first round
attendance for the 16 venues (data available for 15), in rank order:
10536
9628
9427
7948
7117
7012
6397
5353
5188
4358
4089
3882
2830
2112
1906
average attendance
NIT first round games, 2008, with at least one team from a BCS big-6 conference:
avg attendance: 5847
I have no idea if it will be a sellout or not
…but I really believe that no other venue would sell more tickets for the same game.
and I know NOTHING
about “NIT Luxury Boxes” if such a thing exists! ;)
The Future
Let us focus on the future. Uk is in the running for 3 of the 4 players still left in the 2010 class that are ranked in the top 10. We already have the 6th ranked player. Patience.
Lane
6th Ranked Player?
Ferguson is ranked in Top 10 to 25 range by most (definitely not 6th).
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 13, 2009 4:23 PM EDT up reply actions
Ferguson is also
the 2nd ranked SF in the class according to Rivals. Harrison Barnes is #1.
HoopScoop Ranks Him 33rd
Rivals is but 1 source.
Top 10 to 25 range is where he’ll fall.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 13, 2009 4:46 PM EDT up reply actions
Forty
… you’ve been doing this long enough to know Hoop Scoop’s rankings are barely readable, much less legit. Not that ANY High School rankings are much reliable, but when the originator admits that he uses them to gain influence …
The Heart & Mind of the Big Blue Nation ...
I don't pay too much attention to any of them.
But I pay zero attention to Hoop Scoop.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
I Use RSCI (Consensus)
Ferguson will be Top 10 to 25 there.
HoopScoop was AN example.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 13, 2009 5:56 PM EDT up reply actions
3 Players Will Be Departing UK This Spring
Not counting Carter, that is.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 14, 2009 10:00 AM EDT up reply actions
I think we forget
This team was ranked in the 40s by most at the start of the season. It will be OK. UK will come back. If you’re looking for another sport, UK’s baseball team has some big time players on it this year.
As for the game “LSU got up 16 more shots than UK. Ball game.”-Tru
Nothing else you can really say. Even on a down year we still showed we can play with anybody.
offense
Our offense was just so unproductive today. Coach needs to come up with better plays. Our guys need to learn how to set better screens and stay more active withs cuts and we have to learn how to control the games tempo better. The list goes on and on. Nothing a good point guard could not fix really fast.
My Facebook status says...
“Michael is grumpy.”
:-(
Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."
With all the difficulties
This season , and seeing the ups and downs, I am still proud of our guys for their great effort yesterday and today. They just cannot seem to have the same effort from one game to another. Too many mistakes early and a slow start.
I look forward to the NIT. It has been a while since UK played in the NIT, but heck a lot of the elite teams have played in the same venue.
All I can say is have patience UK fans. Next year will be a doozie of a turnaround.
Yes elite teams have played in the NIT this decade...
UCONN, Louisville and UNC to mention a few.
I admit there is a bit of a novelty factor for me seeing the Cats in the NIT
I hope they can get some home games and win a few more.
I like important stuff just as much as the next guy, but please, for a little while, deliver us from meaning, baseball. That's your greatest glory, and we thank you for it very, very much. -- Craig Calcaterra
next year does look and seem a lot better
We could 30 games next year easy, if our recruits are as good as they seem to be. You just never know though until they play some games for UK. Miller is starting to do a lot better. I think he will be awsome next year.
I hope we take off the blue-colored glasses when we examine next year's talent.
I, like most of us, was really overly-optimistic looking at this year’s talent level. Not just with the so-called role players, but also with PP and JM. Both have some flaws they need to work on before they can pick this team up and carry it. I hope they give themselves the chance to do so.
As far as the rest of the guys, I see loads of talent, but unfortunately undeveloped skill, in Miller. The others can probably contribute in spots if there’s enough incoming talent to help keep them in those spots, and not playing full-time.
We really do have to be realistic. There’s a lot of talent out there. We might not have gotten our share lately, and not all talent is developed into “playable” skill. (Forty-remember Bob (Red) Tallent. HS A-A, but played only 136 minutes in his only full year at UK.)
At any rate, hope is about all we have now. About that race to 2000????
No moral victories--it's all about Ws and Ls!!!
Yeah... the 2000 race is about to get interesting
Unless we can string together a few in the NIT.
Carolina probably has at least six to seven more wins in front of them this year.
Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."
Right. I was hopin' for a Hokie win today,
but they choked away the chance late.
No moral victories--it's all about Ws and Ls!!!
Darius Smith
Anybody have info on this guy. Is the hype around this guy letimate??
Lane
Best Player In Illinois This Year
Very legit. I’m not sure he ends at UK though.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 13, 2009 4:47 PM EDT up reply actions
What about PG Konner Tucker?
I’ve heard about this guy and to be honest, UK getting him scares the hell out of me. I’m not sure he will be much an upgrade from Michael Porter honestly. Word is UK has offered him a scholarship. I hope BCG knows what he is doing with that situation.
Yeah...its hard to know about him
I have a distrust of JUCO players at UK.
Slower Traffic Keep Right!
I'll believe that we've offered scholarships when I start hearing that we've booted people off the team
We already need one person to leave (other than D. Williams) to free up the three we have coming in.
Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."
Tucker told Jody Demling of the Courier Journal that UK...
has offered him a scholarship. If this is the case, I hope BCG knows what he is doing.
Porter
Was not recruited as a PG. I don’t care what anyone else says that guy has been playing out of his natural position all year and helped us.
Shooting Guard?
I find it hard to believe that the “shooter” we see out there would be any improved as a “shooting guard”… Sorry.
The Heart & Mind of the Big Blue Nation ...
Porter As SG
Would hit on close to 40% of 3-pt FGA.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 13, 2009 5:56 PM EDT up reply actions
Nope
He can shoot 3-pointers in GAMES too.
As SG he’d get more open looks.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 13, 2009 6:05 PM EDT up reply actions
No.
He gets plenty of open looks as it is, and misses them. I’m sure he’s a great kid that can stroke ‘em during practice, but he seems to choke up during games. Nerves I guess. I know you don’t like people bad mouthing a certain coach’s recruits, but this guy can’t shoot well in high pressure college games. It’s as plain as day to everyone who watches with an open mind.
the REAL fake Mr. Bob Dobalina
Formerly known as "senowen"
He Hit A Bunch Lately
3 of 7 toady. 5 of 9 the other day.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 13, 2009 6:13 PM EDT up reply actions
Who you calling a toady?
Kidding.
I’ll give you that. I sure hope he has turned the corner on his shooting, because having someone (other than Meeks) who can come in and knock down some threes is a great asset.
the REAL fake Mr. Bob Dobalina
Formerly known as "senowen"
you cannot turn it on and turn it off
as much as he is having to focus on the PG spot you have to give him huge kudos for hitting as well as he does.
you know BCG has him doing PG drills in practice – not shooting.
remember the delk experiment at PG -did not work. when he was at his natural position, he hit 7 treys in the finals…..
by memphis wildcat on Mar 13, 2009 9:33 PM EDT up reply actions
Tucker
He is not listed on Rivals as a UK prospect, but that does not mean much, I guess.
Lane
It Means Nothing
He’s a JuCo frosh. Rivals has not even scouted him yet.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 13, 2009 4:47 PM EDT up reply actions
I never get excited about such
As I know whatever the coaching staff is doing must depend on other factors.
mother tucker, uk fans would have a fields day on this guy if he were to come to UK and not be good.
Listen, If BG did offer this kid, then that tells me we are in trouble when it comes to that position. I thought we had a good pg coming in next year already.
The verdict is still out on Villarino
He is indeed a point guard. Many things that you read about him will be very positive. From what I’ve read, he would be more athletic than Porter and have better court vision than Liggins. (Not hard to do admittedly…) However, he isn’t ranked as a top recruit by any of the major scouting services.
Bottom line… he’s probably better than what we’ve got, but he’s no Levance Fields or Ty Lawson.
Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."
Make it to New York!
Ok, if the NIT is where we have to be, maybe I will get something out of it. I need the ‘Cats to make it to New York for the semis so I can see them in person. I could be wrong, but I don’t think I’ve seen them in person since they played Duke up here early in the season a number of years ago.
So, go Cats, and I will be leading the cheering section if they make it this far!
C! A! T! S! CATS! CATS! CATS!
Are you talking about at the Jimmy V Classic?
I saw them play Duke both years at that event….good times
Slower Traffic Keep Right!
That must have been it
Because I think I remember seeing them a couple years in a row also (around 2000-2001, would be my guess, but maybe it was earlier than that).
C! A! T! S! CATS! CATS! CATS!
Correct.
MSG is a much better place to watch a game, though. Hard to find a bad seat there.
C! A! T! S! CATS! CATS! CATS!
I would have loved to see a game at MSG....
but at least my seats were down by the UK bench so it worked out well.
Slower Traffic Keep Right!
I need to vent.
I think the problem started with KY’s downhill slide when CM Newton went by his heart and not his head when he hired TS. As Al McGuire said, KY doesn’t recruit, they invite. I feel TS relied on that and didn’t bother working as hard as he should. After 10 years of approaching mediocracy, TS read the tea leaves and found gentlier pastures. With the recruiting momentum going against us, it was probably too much to ask to stem that downward force in a short time. Maybe BCG has the ability over time to accomplish that huge task or maybe he, or anyone else, would be unable to reverse the tide. I think it is time to for all fans to provide their full support towards the effort to bring KY BB back to where we all want. Remember, a team needs its fans the most when they are down.
Ron, I agree 100% about your point on fan support,
but the days when all UK had to do was “invite” have been gone a long time. The recruiting business is far different from the way it was in the days of late Rupp and mid-career McGuire. The kids are different and the process is different.
No moral victories--it's all about Ws and Ls!!!
Meant to say that I don't think Coach Smith was all that complacent in his recruiting.
Might not have had as many backups as he could have, but we got loads of good players during his years.
No moral victories--it's all about Ws and Ls!!!
Naturally ...
… I missed the Smith comments here. Too many comments to read well.
If we could avoid the Tubby Smith stuff, though, it is the kind of venting we could use more of.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
I Don't Agree With Lots Of That
But Tru doesn’t want rehashing of the Tubby Smith debates.
I’ll respect that.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 13, 2009 5:58 PM EDT up reply actions
Thank you, Forty.
I appreciate your forbearance.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Forbearance?
Thank God for Al Gore inventing Google (or something like that).
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 13, 2009 6:13 PM EDT up reply actions
KYKAT
What was MP recruited for? I know you are not going to say a shooting guard. Listen, Porter is a good Kid but way out of his league. He would be ok at Morehead, or even smaller school. T.S. was confused if he thought MP was going to be a great shooting guard.
The general consensus is that Porter was recruited as a back-up shooting guard
With spot duty at the point.
Remember, he came in with Jasper and Meeks. What else do you think he was recruited for?
Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."
Ask FortyYear
He will give you all the info you need.
Porter has played out of position all year. I know you have seen him hit the 3’s. That is his natural position. And I have to say I love the guy for giving his best effort at PG because we did not have one experienced enough to play that position.
You can talk about Porter all you want to but I still love the guy for playing his heart out at Ky.
Bravo for standing up for Porter
He has worked very hard this year to do what his coach has asked him to do. We should all appreciate that. (Porter doesn’t put himself onto the floor.)
Porter
Was recruited mostly for his high school teammate Adrian Oliver, who went to Washington and subsequently transferred to San Jose State.
He was also probably a bit of a favor to Porter’s dad for Chuck Hayes.
The Heart & Mind of the Big Blue Nation ...
And...
For the fact that he was 3-time All-St in Calif. Leading scorer EVER at MCHS (over Hayes and Oliver). And averaged 41% on 3-pt FG in HS play.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 13, 2009 6:00 PM EDT up reply actions
2006 Recruits (Guards)
Meeks was SG.
Jasper was PG.
Porter was back-up to both.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 13, 2009 5:59 PM EDT up reply actions
to rehash
a comment i made above, remember the delk experiment. did not work – when moved back to natural position he made 7 treys in NC game…
by memphis wildcat on Mar 13, 2009 9:37 PM EDT up reply actions
The difference was Pitino recognized early on it did not work....
and made the change quickly.
Slower Traffic Keep Right!
Not Exactly
He tried it in 1993-94-95 and the start of 1996.
Pitino saw Delk as PG until senior year.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 13, 2009 10:24 PM EDT up reply actions
What I meant was that he did not have Delk play PG the entire year....
in any of those seasons. I know that he felt that PG would be Delk’s position in the pros but Delk played SG the majority of his time at UK.
Slower Traffic Keep Right!
GJ Vilarino
“Very smooth with the basketball, Vilarino also has the basketball IQ to make the plays needed to run a team. He has a nice blend of scoring and passing to his game, but his shot does have room for improvement. Long for 6-foot, he has an intriguing upside to his game. As he gets stronger, he will improve as a half court defender.”
This is a little blurp on GJ from rivals.com
BCG
I think, even though I was very skeptical at first, BCG will be here for a while. I think next year will answer everyones question. I honestly think he means well. He is just so introverted he has turned himself inside out three times already this year. BG I think can get us where we need to go. We just need to give him time. As far as MP goes, I said earlier that he is a great kid and he is the best pg we have right now. I also said he has a big heart. I’m just saying the future of UK should not ride on MP. He was recruited with Meeks and Jasper. That is a good point. It is funny how things end up. I think MP gives it 110% when he is on the floor. He is just out of his league when it comes to any position on the court for UK. He has made some threes, but if you take 100 you are sure to make some.
Most Disappointing News
My disappointment in today’s loss was rather low-grade, sort of like one of those nagging headaches that you recognize from earlier instances and realize that it will soon fade. Fact is expecting anything other than a loss would have been an exercise in denial: UK lost to a more talented, more experienced and at least as equally well coached team. Mark it down: With LSU’s access to talent — especially local talent — and with Trent Johnson at the helm the Tigers will be a force in SEC for the next several years.
The day was not without significant dispiriting news however: UK is reported to have offered a scholarship to a junior college point guard — and a person of pallor as well. It doesn’t require basketball genius to understand that a lack of an elite-type player at the 1 contributed mightily to UK’s problem this season and in the past several seasons. And to once again — see Kevin Galloway — to be relegated to the juco ranks for leadership plainly demonstrates how far UK has declined in the annual race for talent. Though I remain a supporter of Coach Gillispie, his somewhat desperate attempts to fill gaping talent holes bespeaks of his misunderstanding of the status of UK vis a vis the elite programs. How many juco point guards does one find on the rosters of bluebloods UNC, Duke, UCLA, KU, or even Memphis, UConn, for that matter? My fervent hope is that GJ and KC will be the long term solution to a long existent problem but the inking of another juco point guard is likely to result — history being a ready example — in another squandered scholarship.
although i want to agree with you
and will do so in theory, the fact that everyone is breathing down BCG’s neck to win NOW, means he has to fill to PG role ASAP.
a derrick rose comes along only rarely (a freshman PG that leads a team to FF) and no telling how long Cal had been recruiting him.
my point is, i would probably be doing the same thing. Heck, even Pitino used a juco player here and there
also, i know uk football and bball are different, but brooks used the juco ranks to fill holes in the short run and is now getting HS talent in here.
by memphis wildcat on Mar 13, 2009 5:36 PM EDT up reply actions
Person Of Pallor?
Ford. Macy. Harden.
Also persons of pallor?
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 13, 2009 6:01 PM EDT up reply actions
Hey, if we're going to talk about pure athleticism,
what about Chapman and Sheppard? And that old guy, Riley.
No moral victories--it's all about Ws and Ls!!!
I am troubled ...
… by the “person of pallor” comment. How is his skin tone relevant to his game?
I would avoid such references if I were you.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
i would not have responded
had i fully caught the “person of pallor” comment – unbelievable…..
by memphis wildcat on Mar 13, 2009 9:38 PM EDT up reply actions
Need Info
What is the deal with Tucker?? I have not info on him, being from Kansas.
Lane
SEC
Looks like Miss State is going to beat USC.
Lane
Pale and White
… in the poster’s opinion, you have to be dark to be good at point guard. Apparently.
The Heart & Mind of the Big Blue Nation ...
Yeah.
That was def a WTF moment for myself.
the REAL fake Mr. Bob Dobalina
Formerly known as "senowen"
I feel it will be better next year
Coach has had to go with what he inherited and some have really stepped up at times.
It has just been a very up and down thing since we got into the crux of better SEC play.
I do believe in this Coach and the team. I am not saying the players did their best at times, but that has been Coach’s lament all season. He never knows which team will show up from practice to game day.
Now we have the NIT. Go Cats!
Common Trait
Ty Lawson – UNC
Darren Collison – UCLA
Sherron Collins – KU
Levance Fields – Pitt
Johnny Flynn – Syracuse
Devan Downey – USC
Tyreke Evans – Memphis
Tyreese Reece – BC
Scottie Reynolds – Nova
Toney Douglas – FSU
A.J. Price – Uconn
Kalin Lucas – MSU
Stephen Curry – Davidson
Top PG’s in NCAA and they have one common feature: they’re all African-American and more power to them in using their innate abilities. Hopefully we’re not so politically correct as to not recognize the obvious. Using Steve Nash and John Stockton is merely employing exceptions to disprove a demonstrable rule.
This may be so.
We do not need to be concerned, or remark, on the color of one’s skin. The same point could be made about many different things. It is irrelevant and distracting.
Let’s stick to the game, and forget about race. The sooner and better we do that, the sooner and better we will be free from the troubles of the past.
Thank you for your understanding.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Glenn Logan on Mar 14, 2009 12:23 AM EDT up reply actions
Today, our dynamic duo...
just could not get it done. I think Patterson might have missed more shots in a row than I have ever seen him miss. And Jodie was covered up and unable to get free. I also thought the officiating in the first half was horribly lopsided in that we were getting called for several hand checks but when we drove the ball and got hacked several times there were no calls.
Ultimately our undoing today was the inability of anybody outside Meeks and Patterson to deliver a scoring threat. If there was ever a day we needed that mysterious “third scorer” today was the day. We needed Jon Hood today.
Still, I hoped we would make the dance. I am disappointed for our team more than for myself. I know they must be devastated right now. I would tell them to hang on, next year will be better. And it will.
Xbox Live Gamertag: hoopchi
NBA Scouts
For their personal benefit Meeks and Patterson should hope there were no NBA scouts evaluating their performances. Much work to do in improving various skills. From UK’s POV it adds another weight to the say-in-school side of the balance.
question
why is it, exactly, that we are not getting elite point guards in here?
Good question....
Although UK had Turner, Hawkins and Rondo none of them had much an outside shot. They just did eveything else well and only one went pro.
Slower Traffic Keep Right!
Yes
Lost 64-56 to Mich St.
Rallied with 5 under 1 minute but Spartans hit their FT when fouled.
Gophers have FEW shooters.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 13, 2009 6:06 PM EDT up reply actions
I Doubt It This Year
Gophers likely to get NCAA bid.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 13, 2009 6:11 PM EDT up reply actions
He Didn't Last Year
And the 2 teams (Gophers 2008 and 2009) aren’t that much different in terms of results.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 13, 2009 6:30 PM EDT up reply actions
It Depends
They play well (sometimes) but brick their shots other times.
Good, not great team.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 13, 2009 6:12 PM EDT up reply actions
No Expectations
Although I was of course happy with the win over Ole Miss yesterday, I didn’t come into this game expecting the Cats to get a W. I basically had no expectations of this team. If you have no expectations, you’re not disappointed. But I still love my Cats ( which goes w/o saying) and it’s not the end of the world.
At least now we can all watch the NCAAs without our blood pressures reaching stroke level or cursing a stream of obscenities so dense it covers all states included in the SEC.
I know it’s sooooooo cliche, but there’s always next year. All I can say i suppose.
Saw most of the game today
From what I saw, it was turnovers, although less than our usual amount, that took the wind out of our sails. Call it tired, unfocused or whatever you want … but turnovers – especially the unforced errors- just took the momentum from us. I too feel that we played about as well as we could against a determined squad of good LSU players. Wonder if we will play at home in the NIT? I think the higher seed plays at home – it would be a big advantage… it’s been a long time since I’ve followed the NIT. GO CATS!!
All I can say...
I grew up in Kentucky and we lived right in between Louisville and Lexington. I was 8 eight years old when UK hired a cocky, young coach from Providence to come down and try to clean up the mess that Eddie Sutton had left. Over the next 8 years, I spent dozens of memorable days and nights at Rupp watching the most powerful team in the NCAA dominate over the rest of the competition (7 home losses in 8 years, I believe). People like Mashburn, Ford, Delk and Rhodes defended the name of UK & Rupp.
Then, Tubby came to UK and mediocraty began creeping in. We have now seen ten years of mediocraty, evidenced by the fact that a win over UK at Rupp means nothing anymore. It used to be a team’s signature win and now other teams come in and win left and right (6 home losses this season).
I have been livng in Clearwater, FL for almost 3 years now. I have made the trip to Gainesville the last 3 years and sat with the other 18 UK fans and put up with the FL fans just to support the team that I love. I went over to Tampa today to support our team, but, as I sat there and watched things play out, I could not believe that this was the same program that I watched in Lexington as a kid. How did we go from that to this?
I had to get that off my chest…People down here just don’t understand
Whenever I see one of these "Kentucky should never ever struggle in a million years" type posts
I’m just going to start directing people to this comparison. Just to emphasis some perspective (is perspective something that can be emphasized?)
Also, um…just ignore the prediction at the end. Nothing to see there….
I like important stuff just as much as the next guy, but please, for a little while, deliver us from meaning, baseball. That's your greatest glory, and we thank you for it very, very much. -- Craig Calcaterra
Pitino Came From NY Knicks (Not Directly From Providence)
And he had more than 7 home L in 8 years.
I call BS on your 10 years of mediocrity under Pitino’s successor.
UK has averaged 24 W the past 10 years (2000 through 2009).
UK averaged 22 W during the 1970’s and 1980’s (Rupp, Hall, Sutton).
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 13, 2009 10:19 PM EDT up reply actions
I Checked > 7 L In 8 Years In Rupp Arena IS Correct
Home many L does Pitino have in Freedom Hall from 2002 through 2009 seasons? Lots more than 7.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 13, 2009 10:29 PM EDT up reply actions
Agree
Five years in, Pitino was going to the NIT…Who would have guessed that? I got my degree from UofL, so I was around there when Pitino came and their expectations for him were like ours for Gillespie. In Denny Crum’s last few years his teams were not producing and their fans were restless and then when Pitino came he was like the messiah. I will say that he does have a very talented team this year who could definitely win it all.
I Think He Or She Is Strictly A Product Of Early To Mid 1990's
And there are oodles of them out there.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 13, 2009 10:30 PM EDT up reply actions
Agreed, however...
I will steal a line that I heard or read from someone else…
As a KY fan, I do not expect to win the National Championship every year. However, I do expect to at least be able to compete for one every year.
Everythings relative and your definition of competition may be different from mine, but I don’t think we have legitimately competed for a National Championship in about 5 years. I don’t believe Coach Gillespie should be fired and I believe that he will, in fact, play a part in returning our program to glory.
But it still sucks to see our records drop left and right to other teams and it sucks to see our team struggle like I witness firsthand yesterday in Tampa.
I don't understand either.
Can’t you just leave Smith out of it? He won a national championship. Stop with the “mediocrity” crap. Read the community guidelines.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Glenn Logan on Mar 14, 2009 12:26 AM EDT up reply actions
Help!
Matt Jones at KSR is REPEATEDLY making comments insinuating that he has “inside sources” that strongly suggest that GIllispie will not be our coach next year. Someone PLEASE reassure me that will not happen and he will be given another year!!!
I believe in Billy G.
by kentuckygirl0724 on Mar 13, 2009 10:34 PM EDT reply actions
No One Knows That (For Sure)
Not even Gillispie or Barnhart.
And SURELY Matt Jones doesn’t KNOW.
Matt gets a little full of himself sometimes.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 13, 2009 10:36 PM EDT up reply actions
Thanks Forty.
My head knows that but my heart is struggling. I swear this season has been so hard for me. I dont know why – I just really feel that Billy can do this. I just want him to have another chance – at least one more – and if it doesnt work out after that, I will concede on the matter. However, if Billy is dismissed after this season I am seriously going to have a hard time backing Kentucky on that decision.
I believe in Billy G.
by kentuckygirl0724 on Mar 13, 2009 10:45 PM EDT up reply actions
Don't
let anyone ever tell you that your hopes are wrong. We are each entitled to what we believe. You have optimisim and that is important for this day and time and not just in sports. You are an apparently a half glass full person and that is great.
I don't care who is coach as long as Kentucky is Kentucky!
Thats the funny thing
I really am NOT a glass half full person normally – in fact, in most things I am a pretty negative worst-case-scenerio kind of person.
I believe in Billy G.
by kentuckygirl0724 on Mar 14, 2009 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions
i'd like to think
that the people who keep screaming “far billy” are just overly demanding, who are unreasonable in not willing to give our new coach a chance.
While I still question his ability to succeed at the level previous coaches have, (mostly b/c he is fairly new and hasn’t had a lot of time to do so) I am still willing to give him a chance. Two years just simply NOT ENOUGH. It would be ridiculous to fire him considering the fact that he hasn’t done anything illegal, broken rules etc.
Surely Barnhart & Co. have enough sense to realize that.
I
think that if you just pop off and say FIRE BILLY without mentioning your reasons then ya your just unreasonable. But if these kids are not well because of something that Billy is doing to them then its time to move on. We must be willing to listen to both sides. This doesn’t have to be a civil war.
I don't care who is coach as long as Kentucky is Kentucky!
I agree with kykat.
Why do you keep saying this?
I believe in Billy G.
by kentuckygirl0724 on Mar 16, 2009 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions
This
is the time when we just need to see what happends. Matt himself had a post up earlier telling us not to listen to rumors and saying that no one knows what is going on and I am suprised he is saying that. He needs to stick by his own post.
I don't care who is coach as long as Kentucky is Kentucky!
It's easy
It’s easy to talk big about “inside sources” when you are sitting behind a computer.
I think it is disgraceful how the press and some uninformed Internet sites are feeding the anti-Gillispie frenzy.
Instant gratification does not build a program for long-term success. In the education realm, it takes 3 years for a new program to start seeing success. Gillispie is using strong educational decisions by teaching the players to think for themselves on the floor, instilling strong work ethic, and establishing team unity. It will be fun to watch the results.
As much as it sucks to not make the tournament, we have to put this into perspective with the rest on Div. 1. Most teams would be happy if the season we had were their best in 5 years, the fact that it is our worst says a lot.
I’d hate to think that Kentucky fans are settling for less than the best. ;)
We're all just a banana peel away from eternity.
No, it's not a matter of "settling"
I think it’s more a matter of realizing this season is coming to an end and mid-season flashes of brillance were just a mirage of a great season; however, if it happens again next year, without cause, the sea of blue will come to full boil.
FWIW
16-4 At Mid-Season
4-9 since. Very surprising. Wonder what happened?
UK is capable of being that 16-4 team.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 14, 2009 12:19 AM EDT up reply actions
Nobody's "Settling" for anything.
Yes, this season wasn’t the greatest, and yes, we wish it were better, but in the full gammut of thihngs? This season was FAR better than `88-`89.
"I will never leave you nor forsake you."
--Jesus Christ
Further....
…if UK gets the NIT and not the Big Dance, trust me when I say that I’ll accept an NIT Championship from this bunch….and going to the NIT instead of the Dance may just put a fire under this year’s team for next season….
"I will never leave you nor forsake you."
--Jesus Christ
I'm a late arrival to the PM
and am pleased to see everyone has kept their head on this disappointing loss by discussing the future. That in itself gives me a good feeling concerning the program and heartens me going into the NIT and the next year. Yes, this year sucked – but that goes hand ’n hand with great expectations.
FTHOI – thing’s I want to see next year: PPat playing power forward, Meeks able to drive to the basket (in traffic), Millertime, Galloway impersonating Maravich, Orton/Pilgrim/etc. and………….. a point guard.
BTW – nothing in the PM concerning, shall I say, questionable officiating. No, not as an excuse for losing the game; but, deserves a mention.
Mostly ...
… I am pleased as well. But there seem to always be a few who insist upon stirring the pot. I’ll deal with that tomorrow.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Glenn Logan on Mar 14, 2009 12:33 AM EDT up reply actions
Sooo.... with UK, USC, UGA, Vandy and UF all out,
are you going to cheer for Tennessee to do the East proud?
:-D
I'd Sooner Cheer for Duke....
…in NCAA basketball than Tennessee….
Besides, if the past few trips to the dance have been any indication of how thew Vols will fare, I think I culd hold my breath for longer…
"I will never leave you nor forsake you."
--Jesus Christ
WOW - WHAT A SEASON
Gillispie is on very thin ice to say the least. Barnhardt is between a rock and a hard place. OK, enough of the cliches. I believe that it is more likely than not that Billy will not return as UK’s coach next year. He is not going to change and Barnhardt is not going to risk his career at UK to find this out. The Board of Trustees and Todd have spoken and the heat is on, the axe will fall, etc., etc., etc. Personally, I will be very, very, very, very glad when that day comes.
I think it very unlikely ...
… that Gillispie would be tossed after two winning seasons. That would be unprecedented in college basketball history.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Agree (Sort Of)
Matt Doherty was tossed after 3 seasons.
There are examples (Ron Jirsa at Georgia) where a coach was tossed after 2 years. Georgia wanted to hire Jim Harrick, who wound up getting the Bulldogs on NCAA probation.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 14, 2009 10:02 AM EDT up reply actions
None of those examples ...
… had all winning seasons.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Glenn Logan on Mar 14, 2009 10:08 AM EDT up reply actions
True
But there are schools that made the mistake of changing coaches after 2 years of winning seasons.
UCLA did it several times in 70’s and 80’s.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 14, 2009 10:10 AM EDT up reply actions
Day After
I didn’t come on here yesterday at all. Thought I would allow myself some time to think things over. First of all,yesterday’s game was like so many this season. Very little defensive intensity and little on the boards as well. Confusion on offense and too many turnovers, some of which were unforced. Secondly,I think Billy G. will be back and given the opportunity to turn things around. But I think he needs to be told that he has to get things going in the right direction next year. This year was a major step backwards in terms of wins and BG’s popularity with the fans. I admire the optimism of many on here but I just think this guy is a bad fit and I don’t see him turning it around,especially if there are mass player defections. He may be a good recruiter,but he won’t be able to replace all of the ones who may leave. Plus that will mean a lot of pressure on those coming in. It’s just a bad situation if you ask me.
Next Year: Best Case Scenario
It seems reasonable that Barnhart will try to impose conditions when he and Gillispie have their meeting. If Gillispie really is as stubborn and reactive as he seems to be, he may just tell Barnhart what he can do with his conditions. I hope Barnhart has taken the precaution of thoroughly evaluating the records and qualities of potential replacements.
Whatever the outcome, the AD having to confront the coach about his behavior and job responsibilities is not a good position for our program to be in right now. Gillispie has not been a positive representative of the University of Kentucky these past two years, and it is hard to imagine him becoming (overnight) the gracious ambassador that Barnhart envisions.
Having to replace a coach after only two years — whatever the reason — is not good. It’s bad from a perception standpoint, and as a practical matter everybody (players, staff, fans) has to start from scratch. We would lose a good deal of whatever Gillispie has been able to build these past two years.
Some players may be upset and feel they want to leave the program, but when they check out their options they may find that UK is not such a bad place after all.
So let’s hope cool heads prevail all around.
With Gillispie and most players back, we could very well be returning 5 seniors, 2 juniors and a sophomore who have played together for a year and know what Gillispie wants. Even if one of our two stars leaves, we’d still have a veteran team. And this was a team that this year was just a few baskets short of 25 wins.
With some key improvements by each player and another year of maturity, we could win the SEC next year. If any of the recruits become reliable players, we could win a couple of NCAA tournament games.
That would give Gillispie another year to demonstrate with a new group of players that he can be the Kentucky coach we all want.
Well done.
Very well done.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Glenn Logan on Mar 14, 2009 10:14 AM EDT up reply actions
nice someone else notices
And this was a team that this year was just a few baskets short of 25 wins.
I believe 4 games were lost within 5 points or less. Potentially could’ve been 24-9 this year, not anything to sneeze at.
and last year more of those "extra"
baskets went our way – we were probably 25 points or less from a much worse record.
the difference was we had two well seasoned seniors that stepped up.
therefore, i am remaining optimistic about next year as well
by memphis wildcat on Mar 14, 2009 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions
Good post. Some thoughts...
Perry Stevenson had 5 points and 2 boards in 33 minutes of action. 2 boards is half the amount of the lowest starting tiger (who play a 3 guard lineup).
Would LSU trade their 3-5 players for ours (Harris, Porter, Stevenson)? Would Tennessee? Florida? South Carolina? Auburn? Miss State? How far down the ladder do you have to go in the SEC to find another team who lacks as badly as we do outside of their top two players?
I mean, we talk about Perry having a great game with 13 points and 8 boards. Porter is said to have a pretty good game with 3 assists and 1 TO. Really? The individual expectations for some players are beyond mediocre, yet we still expect greatness from the team as a whole.
It makes me wonder if a large part of the reason we think Patterson and Meeks are so good is that they play with such a poor supporting cast. That our high expectations for each team going into the season (win the sec, compete in the ncaa’s) cause us to – at times – dramatically overestimate the quality of the personnel.
People knock the coach for not being able to improve his players. Folks, I have news for you. Stevenson has pretty much maxed out his basketball potential. Porter has reached the ceiling of his talent as well. And, as hard as Harris plays, he’s never gonna be much better than he is right now. Coach isn’t a miracle worker.
Face it, they’re just not that good. It’s not the coach’s fault. In fact, I give them credit for working as hard as they did this year to be such a good defensive team. They obviously lack offensive talent, but they’ve worked hard to succeed where they could.
One last thing. We sure did miss Jasper this year. Can’t put that one on the coach either.
Only An Extra Year
Don’t make too much of 5 seniors next year. Is an additional year going to make Perry Stevenson any stronger, have a more aggressive attitude, to have better hands than those for which he was genetically programmed? Is twelve more months going to provide a boost in Michael Porter’s athleticism, a leap in his leadership ability, an injection of quickness and ability to penetrate off the dribble? Is another summer and fall practice with the same limited shooting skills, ball handling and shot-making capabilities apt to cause Ramon Harris to fill the role of an accomplished small forward? Will Jodie Meeks’ actual mental understanding of the game grow to match his considerable physical abilities? Will Kevin Galloway’s single year in D1 and additional time understanding and accepting the demands of a lead guard in Gillispie’s system be enough to provide meaningful contribution? The answer to all those is highly problematic and certainly not assuredly positive. That’s why my optimism — barring the change to a new coach and system — lies with the younger players and recruits.
Hmmm, Another "Dig" At UK's 2006 Recruiting Class
Stevenson averaged 7.5 pts and 6 rebs this year. That’s what Jared Prickett averaged at UK. Did he suck, too?
Porter will be fine as back-up SG to Meeks.
Harris is a capable WF defender and decent scorer but the UK coach SHOULD have developed Darius Miller more.
Meeks will be All-SEC and possibly A-A if he returns.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 14, 2009 9:10 PM EDT up reply actions
Forty,
This blog has gotten so nothing can be said about Tubby so we don’t stir up your ire. Now are we to assume we can’t say anything about any player recruited by Tubby, also?
Never Mentioned The T Word
The 2006 class are UK players. Sorry but I’ll defend them if you won’t.
Those 4 UK players will be fine next year.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 15, 2009 12:20 AM EDT up reply actions
but, forty, wouldn't you agree
that most of the 06 are supporting players?
that being said, BCG will have had 3 years to get some stars in here. of course that brings up your and my ongoing disagreement that BCG really did not have time for 08.
however, that argument will be moot with the 09 class. if BCG is truly the wonder recruiter he is suppose to be, then it should be showing up by then….
by memphis wildcat on Mar 15, 2009 12:26 AM EDT up reply actions
They Were Back-Ups (Except Meeks And Jasper)
But they are now starters.
Meeks and Jasper were/are solid UK caliber starters.
Stevenson a solid back-up post player.
Porter a decent reserve SG or PG.
Harris is a capable defender.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 15, 2009 1:10 AM EDT up reply actions
thanks,
could not have said it better myself – solid back-up,decent reserve, capable
by memphis wildcat on Mar 15, 2009 1:26 AM EDT up reply actions
Except For Meeks And Jasper
Who are / were Div I starters almost anywhere.
Stevenson will never be great (scorer) but he is one heckuva defender. Lots of schools wanted him. LSU, Texas, Ga Tech (et al).
Harris has excellent athletic skills. Runs the floor well. Good leaper. Very fine defensive capabilities. I don’t think he was ever fully healthy after the serious injury earlier in the season. Georgetown (DC) was hard after him in 2006.
Porter is (or should be) a back-up SG who can play PG in a pinch. He can shoot well from 20+ feet but not while PG-ing. Meeks and Jasper = SG and PG starters from his class.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 15, 2009 1:53 AM EDT up reply actions
Forty, stop this.
That’s inexcusable. He made sound points. Knock off the hypersensitivity.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Glenn Logan on Mar 15, 2009 12:55 AM EDT up reply actions
3-4-5 Players > Why Exclude Miller And Harrellson?
Would any other SEC team want Harrellson or Donald Williams?
Why just compare SOME not all UK players on the current roster?
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 14, 2009 11:08 AM EDT reply actions
Because they don't start
Nor should they. That’s how bad it is. As bad as our 3-4-5 starters are, no one else on the bench who played well enough, consistently enough, to take their place.
Miller Not Better Than Harris?
Please.
Liggins or Galloway not better PG than Porter?
Please.
Agree that Stevenson > Harrellson.
I think Josh is overmatched in SEC.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 14, 2009 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions
forty - you're comments make me think
and unfortunately, it is only hypothetical, but i wonder if BCG knew how things would turnout (not making the NCAA – assuming we don’t), would he have done it differently?
it seems by playing porter and harris, he was trying to minimize his losses rather than maximize his wins – in other words, he was playing the players that listened to him more. on the other hand, had he gone with galloway/liggins at PG and miller at the 3 (and even stewart/harrelson at the 4) we would have suffered even more in the early going, but could have conceivably been better at years end. of course a 16-4 (5-0) start seems to indicate he made the right decision early on.
cannot argue with him – and do not think it has a bearing on his coaching ability – but perhaps reveals a bit about his style – ie, he is not necessarily a risk taker and plays the odds. i would think as he is able to get some better overall talent in here (assuming he is), that style might work a bit better.
by memphis wildcat on Mar 14, 2009 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions
Maybe So
The 18-13 year and 5-7 in OOC play made him more inclined to W big in OOC play rather than gain experience.
The 2008 class was highly touted but didn’t do much this year.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 14, 2009 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions
By Whom?
Certainly not by me. Anytime UK is obligated to the juco ranks (including one player who signed with a low mid major out of HS) and then offers a scholarship to a 2* unknown it demonstrates the starkly reduced level of the program in the minds of recruits. Some might consider #21 (Rivals) and #15 (Scout) as a highly touted class but it would seem that reality has proved to be quite contrasting.
By Everyone BUT You Then
The UK recruits in 2008 gained acclaim from nearly every recruiting service as Top 15 to 20 class.
JuCo recruits. Bob Burrow was JC, did he suck, too?
Dale Brown and Rodney Dent were signed by Pitino. Did they suck?
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 14, 2009 9:12 PM EDT up reply actions
I apologize to all ...
… for the harsh language and nastiness 4UK assailed you with. I have granted his wish. I can’t allow that.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
apology accepted
but no need. you do a great job.
given the site is open 24/7, you cannot watch it all the time.
we all knew you would handle it asap.
by memphis wildcat on Mar 15, 2009 1:37 AM EDT up reply actions
Not only that ...
… he was deliberately disrespectful of what we have worked so hard to create.
It’s a shame a smart guy like that has to resort to venting his spleen in public. That’s pathological.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by 











