Kentucky 71, Ole Miss 58: Postmortem
I can't tell you what a pleasure it is to write about a victory again, instead of a defeat. This four-game losing streak that just ended today has been among the most difficult times I have experienced as a Wildcat fan, and definitely the least fun stretch of blogging I have ever had to do.
Despite a determined effort from the Ole Miss Rebels today, a wounded David Huertas was just too tough an obstacle for the Rebels to overcome. Terrico White was terrific in defeat, and even though Huertas managed 15 points, he was only 4-14 from the field. Nice effort by the Rebels. They will be much tougher next year when they get their injured starters back.
For Kentucky, this was a game of stretches. For some stretches in the game, the Wildcats struggled like crazy to score. In others, they seemed to score effortlessly. But today, the Wildcats ran offense that looked like ... well, like offense, and defended very well in the second half. Despite a white-hot first half shooting, the Wildcats wore the Rebels down and eventually, their shooting returned to form.
It really is amazing to me the difference between the way the Wildcats attacked the zone defense today and they way they failed to attack it last weekend in Gainesville. For the first time in a long time, switching defenses did not seem to bother Kentucky. When the Rebels went zone, the 'Cats got the ball into the middle, forced rotation and Darius Miller was usually the guy that drove the ball into the paint and scored. When the Rebs were in man to man, Meeks made startling cuts and dribble dives to the basket, or repeatedly pounded the ball in to Patterson and Stevenson. The result was effective offense -- dare I say, "good" offense? Maybe.
But what really won this game for Kentucky to day was the outstanding board work by the 'Cats. 13 offensive and 22 defensive rebounds for a 7-rebound margin against the Rebels. Not a great margin, but when you look at the OR% of 37%, that is very solid, especially compared to Ole Miss' 15% effort on the offensive glass. Combined with one of our lowest turnover games in a long while (10), the 'Cats got up 12 more shots than the Rebels.
Some observations:
- Patrick Patterson continues to struggle with shots he was making earlier this year. I wonder why? But he took a couple of face-up jumpers that were very nice. It was a solid game for Patterson, but we have come to expect better than 7-15 from him. But he was a beast on the boards, garnering 14 boards, 3 of them offensive.
- Perry Stevenson had a whale of a game. I suppose we'll see him turn sideways and vanish into thin air tomorrow, but today he was large and in charge, with 13 points on 4-6 shooting with 8 rebounds including 4 offensive.
- The things Ramon Harris does cannot be measured. He did a great defensive job on Terrico White, even though White was red hot in the first half. Almost every one of those shots was challenged, but White could not miss. It went the other way in the second half, though. Harris also managed 7 rebounds.
- Neither team shot well from three, and only a late Jodie Meeks three saved UK's 3-pointer-in-a-game streak. 1-10 is loathsome shooting from the arc. Ole Miss was at least not horrible at 30%.
- I loved the way Meeks played today. He made shot fakes instead of taking wild shots, he knifed to the basket with frightening abruptness and finished or got fouled. Despite only one 3, Meeks got his average. That is a scorer. That's why he'll get paid big bucks to play ball after next year.
- What can I say about Darius Miller? The freshman was simply terrific offensively. The only real criticism I can make is that he got bupkis for rebounds. How do you manage that at the 3 spot?
- Michael Porter was ... well, Michael Porter. He hustled, he defended to the best extent his limited athleticism would allow, he was tough and determined. But he was also so far off shooting that his seven missed shots barely threatened to touch the rim, let alone go through the hoop. He did make one very nice driving layup, had three assists and only one turnover. I suppose, on balance, that his negatives and positives were close.
- Josh Harrelson had a positive impact in only 8 minutes, but a really dumb three limited his playing time.
- Kevin Galloway tried, but he really struggled today defensively. His man beat him over and over, but he did make a couple of nice passes and did not turn the ball over.
- DeAndre Liggins barely played, and came with one foul of making no mark at all on the game.
One thing I did notice was that UK stayed at home, and only one person went to block the shot. In my view, this was one of the reasons that Kentucky did so well on the glass today. I would also note that Ole Miss did not pressure Porter, which is likely why we did not see a bunch more turnovers. Another possible negative is that the 'Cats did not put away the game until fairly late, so Gillispie was not able to rest the starters a great deal. But for once, his substitutions made some semblance of sense, and both Patterson and Meeks got at least a few minutes of rest.
All in all, this was a solid effort from Kentucky, especially defensively in the second half, holding Ole Miss to only 20 points. Forcing turnovers was a big part of that, something UK has not done particularly well this year.
So now, the 'Cats move on for another shot at LSU, who will be rested and ready. If Kentucky brings the effort they had today, they should be competitive, but Jodie Meeks must be more effective from the perimeter. But for now, we can celebrate a victory for the first time in two weeks, and it feels really good.
0 recs |
28 comments
|
Comments
Adjustments
Were made for today, at long last. I do think it still goes back to yeaterday’s post that if players execute, you look much better. If they don’t, everyone wants your head on a post at the city limits.
I found much to be hopeful about today, and was encouraged that we FINALLY figured out how to play against the zone. Plus, Jodie didn’t force the action and took advantage of the defense to score on several good drives.
All in all, a MUCH better game today by all.
by JKW19742004 on Mar 12, 2009 7:28 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Much better indeed
It wasn’t perfect but you have to be happy to win. I agree that Perry Stevenson and Darius Miller were HUGE. Now,can they beat LSU??
by maysvilleblue on Mar 12, 2009 7:54 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I've been in a good mood all day
Cause we FINALLY got a W.
So happy with the way our boys did today.
by uk1982 on Mar 12, 2009 7:57 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i know i feel better
can you imagine how the team feels?
hopefully, they can build on it.
and yes, i wish i could bottle this feeling – i am always in a better mood after a win…..
by memphis wildcat on Mar 12, 2009 8:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i said yesterday
W’ing this game is a shot in the arm.
by uk1982 on Mar 12, 2009 8:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tru
I am relieved you could finally blog about a win. You’ve hung tough with us through these losses.
by kykat51 on Mar 12, 2009 8:22 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
yes....
what i saw today was a team that was unafraid, talented, skilled, disciplined, and well-coached. most of all they were loose and confident.
i believe all of the negativity, anger, depression, outrage, etc cast upon them in the past few weeks has made them take on an “us against the world” mentality and that they have “circled the wagons”, so to speak.
will it last? maybe, maybe not. i have good feeling after seeing perry s., darius, porter, and others step up today. if not this season, next is looking brighter today.
and as pat pat said, this season is not over.
GO CATS!!!
by mateotemprano1 on Mar 12, 2009 8:28 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Comfort Zone
Didn’t it appear that the Cats found themselves a bit of a comfort zone today? And isn’t it a tad ironic that most managers (coaches) spend a lot of time, energy and other resources attempting to nudge folks out of their comfort zone? It appeared to me from the outset — even though the Rebels were hitting shots and making plays — that UK was playing with a sort of relaxed effort…playing hard but not playing too hard. For the last several games, even those they won, the Cats appeared nearly mechanical in their actions instead of letting their abilities work. Or put another way: playing in an “uncomfort zone”. Ah, but the trick is of course to be comfortable without becoming satisfied. So what areas need improvement for a victory over the Tigers? Be stronger with the ball, how many times did Cats fail to finish near the basket? Especially Patterson — is it possible he developed bad habits with the damaged finger? Or is he still favoring it? Stevenson’s hands and overall strength may never improve and Harrellson appears to sacrifice power for touch. Meeks for perhaps the first time looked comfortable in attacking off the dribble and made better use of screens (which may have been better established) but his perimeter shooting must improve and perhaps will if he slows the pace a few milliseconds. Well tomorrow is nearly here and we can all hope that UK — including its coach who also appeared rather more at ease — will be more firmly ensconced in its comfort zone.
by Wild Weasel on Mar 12, 2009 8:29 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Great Effort
Great effort by all. Would like to have gotten PPat more rest, but these kids are still young. We will need Galloway to play better against LSU, to give us a chance to get another W.
by cwellsy on Mar 12, 2009 8:34 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Tomorrow's Game
Ok – so everyone has to do exactly what they were doing today during the game, only this time they have to do it a little bit better. ;)
I believe in Billy G.
by kentuckygirl0724 on Mar 12, 2009 9:02 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
exactly
was thinking if they win tomorrow, i may have to go in on Saturday and watch the game on my work computer :)
by memphis wildcat on Mar 12, 2009 9:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Today
A “W” for the C-A-T-S …. wahoo!! Hope they find confidence to build on this win. LSU is a winnable game for this team. Why they decided to come out of their shell in this game, I don’t know … but I’ll take a win anytime. Still more work to do in Tampa.
I was excited to here that Orton and Pat had talked about playing together – then to see that Pat will be back next year …. Christmas is here way early for us CAT fans (not to mention BCG) . I hope that news will help us land a top notch recruit … (ok FORTY go ahead and interject a stat here) Happy Day at last for the CATS …. GO BIG BLUE!!
by ukcris on Mar 12, 2009 9:21 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Question-
why would ole miss play in a zone? seems they had pretty good success in the reg season game playing man (and i think some box and one) vs uk in oxford. not sure why they would change.
was it early foul trouble, injury, or just a bad coaching move? seems to me thats what got miller into the flow in 2H. also in 1H it allowed stevenson to get some put backs.
just was wondering……thoughts?
by memphis wildcat on Mar 12, 2009 10:18 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Given how badly UK "attacked" the zone against Florida, I would have tried it too
That and the lack of outside shooters makes a zone the most logical choice for a defense against UK these days.
I like important stuff just as much as the next guy, but please, for a little while, deliver us from meaning, baseball. That's your greatest glory, and we thank you for it very, very much. -- Craig Calcaterra
by JLeverenz on Mar 12, 2009 10:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agree W/Gators, But
Obviously UK’s ineptitude versus UF was a factor in Kennedy’s decision but in reality UK’s perimeter threats are so lacking: Meeks and…and…and (Miller is the likely addition) — that any effective defense will be sufficient.
by Wild Weasel on Mar 12, 2009 10:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And Meeks hasn't been much of a perimeter threat recently
I don’t know what it is, but his jump shot has been really off the last several games – even when he’s been wide open.
I like important stuff just as much as the next guy, but please, for a little while, deliver us from meaning, baseball. That's your greatest glory, and we thank you for it very, very much. -- Craig Calcaterra
by JLeverenz on Mar 12, 2009 10:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Coach told him to slow down his shooting.
“Put a little angle on it Jodeeee!
You are gonna scare folks! The other kids on the team will just stand around if you don’t miss more often. Set your average, and get it every game. NEXT YEAR, when the rest of the guys are up to speed you can pour it in like paint. Thanks for being such a TEAM PLAYER.”
“Okay Coach.”
———————
My father’s brother’s cousin’s neice overheard this exchange at practice after the UT game.
:)
by bluecrip on Mar 13, 2009 12:25 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yes on the UF comment
guess i had put that game out of my mind.
of course, this discussion begs the question – why are so many fans mad that BCG will not play a zone when it is the opponents 3 point shooting that has killed us?
by memphis wildcat on Mar 13, 2009 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think its more a sign of stubborness
Yes, a zone is vulnerable to three point shooters… but there are plenty of other situations where it could have benefitted us. Additionally, just playing one or two possessions of it in a game forces future opponents to spend practice time preparing for it.
I think most fans are frustrated because they see his refusal to play zone, even when outmanned athletically for man-to-man, as one more sign of his unwillingness to bend.
Sadly, I also have heard some comment that playing zone is a good way to defend the three. These fans put serious strain on our claim to be the smartest college basketball fans in the country!
Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."
by chirop1 on Mar 13, 2009 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jim Boeheim And John Cheney Made It To HOF By Playing Zone D
It’s more of individual coaching philosophy (and preference) than anything.
Adolph Rupp hated to play Zone Defense. But his teams did (in the 60’s).
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 13, 2009 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Of course
And to be honest, I would prefer to see us playing a smart match-up man-to-man defense over a primary zone; however, I recognize that there is a time and a place for both.
Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."
by chirop1 on Mar 13, 2009 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The zone ...
… is rarely used as the major defense, with a few notable exceptions, and virtually all those exceptions that are worth a hoot use man principles in their zone.
I really don’t have a problem with Gillispie eschewing the zone. It is really a percentage defense, although the very best zone teams can play it aggressively enough to make it more than just something designed to force teams into lower percentage shots.
For my money, the zone allows too many offensive rebound opportunities. It’s OK for a possession or three, but other than that, I think we should avoid it.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Mar 13, 2009 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
A lot more hustle on 50/50 balls too
There were two plays in the first half that, for me, signaled a strong, positive improvement in the effort of the team.
The first was the loose ball initially caused by Miller and which Porter subsequently dove to the floor to get, got it out to Meeks who eventually left it to Patterson for a slam.
The second was Stevenson diving to the floor after a loose ball rebound that he got a tie-up with the arrow favoring UK.
Two plays that I don’t think we saw much of the last 4 games, and Porter, Miller, and Stevenson deserve a lot of credit for making them.
I like important stuff just as much as the next guy, but please, for a little while, deliver us from meaning, baseball. That's your greatest glory, and we thank you for it very, very much. -- Craig Calcaterra
by JLeverenz on Mar 12, 2009 10:21 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Much better,agreed.
The team seemed more poised and also the welcomed return of Perry Stevenson. Darius Miller was fanatastic as well. Going to need more from both today.
by maysvilleblue on Mar 13, 2009 7:16 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Congratualtions to UK
…and good for you guys. From the little I saw in the first half, two things stuck our for me:
1. For the first time in a long time, I am proud of my country…wait that’s not it…. I mean I understood Gillispie’s rotation. It made sense to me.
2. I thought the Cats played offense a lot faster & much quicker. I really liked their aggresiveness.
Of course they will even need to pick it up more since LSU is a much better team. After watching the six overtime games last night, anything is possible!!
Good luck today.
'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'
by HozeKing on Mar 13, 2009 9:42 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
1. ROFL
2. I agree. I think a slightly faster pace could cut down on turnovers that we seem to make as we start making the 6th, 7th, and 8th passes on a possession.
I can’t believe you stayed up for all 6 of those OT’s. I set the sleep timer on my TV and conked out somewhere around the start of the second OT. That’s a game that will be talked about for years.
Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."
by chirop1 on Mar 13, 2009 9:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 















