Kentucky Basketball: There are none so deaf as those who will not hear
Epiphanies strike when you least expect, which is perhaps why they are called, "epiphanies," and not, "comprehension." Either way, I had an epiphany today, one that we all should have recognized a long time ago. But it's really hard to blame fans for a failure to see the truth, even when it is laid out right in front of them. Almost all fans run around with a bunch of built-in preconceptions that cloud their judgment -- things like tradition, expectations, and conclusions built on the sandy foundation of hope.
It's funny how years of fandom can cloud one's judgment. We think we know so much, because we have all seen so much over the years. The evidence of our eyes, the emotions of past glory, failure and perception of failure all conspire to rob us of a gimlet-eyed view of the object of our adulation and affection. When that object comes on hard times, blame must be assessed for the sake of "tradition" and "the program." The scare-quotes there aren't meant as a backhanded pejorative, but rather just to illustrate the ephemeral nature of the concepts.
So what was this epiphany I had? In a nutshell, it is this: We have been asking questions of the darkness all year -- "Why are we not doing X?" "Why isn't this team better?" "We have more than enough talent, how can we be losing so many games?" The answer is simple -- this team is refusing to carry out the instructions of the coaching staff, and has been all year long.
That answer is very cryptic in its simplicity, and need a lot of exposition. Even though it makes sense in its most simplistic form, it's much more complex and nuanced than the simple sentence above can justify. That will be the objective of these next few paragraphs.
Billy Gillispie has been very direct and very explicit about what is wrong with this team. The problem is, Kentucky fans have been too deaf to hear what he is telling us. Sherman, set the Wayback Machine for November 14th, 2008. Gillispie said after that game:
They [VMI] played really hard and really well. I thought we would have played better and executed plays better than we did tonight. We knew those kind of things would be important in the game and we just didn't do them."
Now, what does that mean? It means exactly what it says -- the Wildcats did not execute the game plan. Why? Did they not know the plan? Did they not study film? What happened there? This was a warning for the future that nobody picked up on.
Gillispie has consistently complained about execution, but one of the best examples we have seen all year was the game Saturday at Florida. Florida zoned us for most of the game, and every UK fan knows the way you attack a zone defense -- you get the ball in the middle of the zone, forcing either outside players to collapse or inside players to help -- pick your poison. Most teams bring their outside players in. When that happens, your shooters go to the zone that the help defender just vacated for the open shot. If rotation comes, you drive the ball inside, forcing the zone to collapse and kick it out for a wide-open jumpshot. If help comes from inside, you dump it down for a post-up. Most teams chose option 1, and force you to make lower percentage shots. The zone is a percentage defense -- it wants for force you to take shots that you are more likely to miss.
Kentucky hardly ever got the ball into position to properly attack the zone. It is utterly inconceivable that any college coach did not explain in detail to his charges what to do when facing the zone, so we know that Gillispie had to tell them what to do. We have seen UK attack a zone successfully this way several times this season. And yet, for some reason, the 'Cats simply passed the ball around the perimeter. That is a failure to execute one of the simplest offenses in college basketball.
Sherman, set the Wayback Machine to the Las Vegas Invitational, December 1, 2008, the day after the tournament.
On if it was a hard decision to allow Liggins to play in the game against West Virginia…
"His teammates said they wanted him to play in the regular rotation to give us the best chance to win, so that's what we did. I think it shows a great deal of courage by him and about our team, and how much they care about each individual.”
This was a critical mistake by Gillispie, and I am confident that he knows it. Gillispie was put in a tough spot by Liggins here. Had he suspended or benched Liggins in front of his friends, family and former schoolmates in Las Vegas, he faced the possibility of another Alex Legion mid-season departure. The fans and the UK media would have gone nuts over that, and cast a pall over the whole season. So Gillispie made an executive decision -- treat Liggins like the Prodigal Son. That decision would come back to haunt him.
The Liggins decision was the beginning of the end of this team as far as being competitive was concerned. We couldn't see it then, and even months removed from the event. But like a slow growing tumor that gradually crowds out organs and makes them incapable of functioning, the decision not to punish DeAndre Liggins set the stage for what would ultimately become, for lack of a better word, a mutiny. Basketball teams must be run like a benevolent dictatorship, and insubordination must be dealt with firmly. Gillispie knows this, but he had competing interests here -- a cloud of negativism with a Liggins defection or the hope he could recover from what he had to know was a mistake later.
Turning now to the Louisville game, quoting Rick Pitino:
On starting Edgar Sosa ...
"We had a long talk. I said `Edgar, if I were you I would transfer now. I wouldn't wait because you need a year under another coach to learn his system. I really think you should. The fans aren't too happy with you. More importantly if you are not happy with yourself, you're not having fun.
I want you to compare this with Gillispie's comments allegedly "throwing his players under the bus." Pitino, remarkably, came out and savaged a player in front of the media, informing the press that he tried to get Sosa to transfer, but delivered it with such glib style that nobody noticed. Can you imagine what would happen if Gillispie said that about Liggins or Stewart right now? Can you say, "Double standard," boys and girls? When you are winning, nobody notices. When you are losing, even the most ordinary utterances become fodder for criticism.
Finally, the harbinger of the collapse that nobody seemed to notice:
On Devan Downey and trying to defend him …
“We had no answer and had nobody who wanted any part of him. He is a really good player and played great today. Their guys followed instructions the way they were suppose to and that is why they played tougher and smarter than us and that is why they won. [sic]
At this point, some of the players have stopped taking direction from Coach Gillispie. What Gillispie said was that the Gamecocks did what they were told to do, and UK didn't. That was clearly so then, and it's clearly so now. Many angry fans will tell you over and over again that Gillispie is a bad coach these days, but it's really simple to see that even the most clueless coach knows when his team is following instructions and when it is not.
Finally, we come to the Georgia game at Rupp Arena:
On Kentucky's mass substitutions…
“We weren't getting much production. It's entirely my fault. I'm having a hard time finding five guys that play hard, smart and together the whole time. We are trying a lot of different things but none of them seem to be working right now. Georgia played great. They made a lot of shots. We didn't do that. I guess we aren't mature enough to understand what we need to do.
In retrospect, this is a very telling quote. The team is not doing what they are instructed to do. Gillispie is giving them a lot of credit by speculating that it is a maturity problem, and that is most certainly part of it. But the "crux of the biscuit," as Frank Zappa would tell you, is that this team has ears, but does not hear. They simply will not do what they are asked, and at this point in the season, it's as much becaue of a fear of failure as it is willful disobedience.
Last night, Gillispie said he started the guys he did because he trusts them. He has said that before, but my mind never really grasped what that meant. He trusts them to do what he tells them, and he does not trust the other guys. What that means is that he is starting not the most talented team, but the only team that will obey his instructions. Our losses are coming from a combination of a lack of quality play from the bench (due to a failure to implement the coaching staff's game plan), and the necessity of starting guys who are talent-challenged or athletically inferior, because they will carry out his instructions. The reason the starters look so bad is the latter, not the former. When the bench players come in, the situation is reversed.
The A.J. Stewart debacle, which Gillispie decided to handle just like Liggins (another misjudgment, in my opinion), has now removed this team from reality. Wholesale changes will have to be made, and the unfortunate fact is that will once again place us behind the recruiting 8-ball. We may get lucky (Gillispie is certainly due for a little good luck) but the odds are against us.
It is also instructive to note that nobody has noticed the apparent mutiny going on down in Gainesville. Billy Donovan's team is clearly in a similar situation, although Donovan has handled it much better, partially enabled by the lower profile of Florida basketball (amazing to say about a team who won the national championship very recently in back-to-back years, and with less talent than he currently has on his team). But before you feel sorry for Gillsipe, remember that he made his bed on this one with his mishandling of media interviews combined with the somewhat unfair controversies he generated over the off-season last year. All that combined has made him much easier to dislike and paint as an ogre, which Kentucky fans are now in the business of enabling, it seems.
But even with all that said, Gillispie has accepted the blame 100% of the time, as he should. And before you get the impression that I am blaming the team and not him, I must tell you that Gillsipie created this problem back in December, and I have been very explicit about that. He is getting exactly the blame he deserves, but very often for the wrong reasons. His coaching hasn't failed this team, but his management of the personnel off the court clearly has. That has all led to a crisis of confidence, and even if this team suddenly decides to listen and do what the staff says, their confidence in themselves and each other may be too low for them to be successful this year.
In summary, the problems with this team have been right there in front of us for the entire season, and Gillispie has been telling us nothing but the truth. He cannot be explicit for any number of good reasons, not the least of which it would have sped up the ultimate failure of the team, and made him look even worse. Instead, he has cut his losses and decided to fight this battle in the interregnum between this year and next. Given the current state of affairs, that is probably wise.
1 recs |
295 comments
|
Comments
There's a lot of truth to this, I think
There are even more direct quotes to support this that I’ve seen.
And I really do think a big contributing factor to the “mutiny” is all the negativity towards the coach on the message boards – all the “far gillispie” nonsense, especially. This just gives the players (and they do read these boards) the justification to defy their coach, because they have tons of people in the commonwealth that agree with them, right?
I’m not saying fans don’t have a right to moan and vent on the message boards, but you reap what you sow. Negativity breeds negativity, I’m not at all surprised.
Negativity breeds negativity
If I had a dollar for every time I have said that this season, I would be a very rich woman.
I TOTALLY believe that the “fans’” negativities are fueling the fire that has been this season, but you cant tell anybody anything. Those that dislike and blame Billy have been screaming it from the highest rooftops and the “angry mob” has come together – pitchforks in hand. Absolutely ridiculous, completely classless, and highly humilating.
I believe in Billy G.
by kentuckygirl0724 on Mar 10, 2009 10:42 AM EDT up reply actions
Criticize in a classy manner
Negativity does breed negativity. I wish some fans would understand that you can criticize the coach and players without being disrespectful and classless. There is always a more civil means of going about something. Classy is always the best way to go.
Danny Jett Jr.
by theinnercircle on Mar 10, 2009 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions
so
your are saying that the fans negativity are breeding negative results to UK basketball?
I don't care who is coach as long as Kentucky is Kentucky!
Let me also say
it’s just one contributing factor, among many. But it may be larger than people think. I think even coach G is being influenced by the negativity. Tubby certainly was.
Tubby Wasn't So Much
Donna WAS.
A lot!
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 10:59 AM EDT up reply actions
Forty
I talked with Donna at the Ole Miss game they year that they left. I told her thank you for everything that theyhave done and sacrificed for UK and she gave me a great big hug and said thank you and you could see it in her eyes that she was weary.
I don't care who is coach as long as Kentucky is Kentucky!
Take Some Comfort
Donna is happier than I’ve ever seen her (since I first met her in 2000). I’ll see her agin Thursday. Minnesota AD got me ticket in the Gopher “family” section at B10T.
10 years is a long time. Change is often good. For both sides of the change.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 11:03 AM EDT up reply actions
good
I really love her and Tubby too. We were waiting for UK to come out to get on the bus and Tubby was the last to come out and Brian was out there waiting for his dad. Tubby gave him a great big hug and told him “I Love you son”. It was a sweet moment.
I don't care who is coach as long as Kentucky is Kentucky!
Brian
Is coaching at Minneapolis Southwest HS this year. His star player is going to walk on at U of Minn.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions
ok do
I have the name right? It was the one who played for Ole Miss. I thought he just graduated college last year?
I don't care who is coach as long as Kentucky is Kentucky!
Yep
Brian is the youngest. He’s in first year of HS coaching as assistant.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 11:20 AM EDT up reply actions
soo...
….does he have any pets??? how many rooms does his house have? Does a neighborhood kid mow his lawn?…the answer is LMAO
No Pets
They live in a townhouse in the Dinkytown area of Minneapolis. Tubby walks to work every day.
Little or no lawn but taken care of by townhome association.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 11, 2009 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions
Absolutely
Definitely plays a big role – IMO.
I believe in Billy G.
by kentuckygirl0724 on Mar 10, 2009 11:51 AM EDT up reply actions
Meh
I can’t say I’m a big buyer of the “negativity from the fans have impacted the players” argument. One, I think it is self-serving – it makes us feel like we have more influence/control over the team than we really have. This is a natural reaction, as the opposite realization (powerlessness), would make us admit that our “fandom” is just pissin’ in the wind – and if you (the fan) can’t do something that improves the team, what is the point?
Two, we are never going to eliminate the negativity in the BBN. It comes with the territory of any high profile program (be it college or pro). The players know this (remember, most were recruited during / right after the whole Smith “civil war”), and the coach surely knows this. It is what it is.
The fact of the matter is, when you bring 10-15 newly minted “adults,” who are away from their families / support systems for the first time, mix in a coach who by any estimation has some personality “quirks,” and throw all that into the crucible that is Kentucky basketball, you are going to get some unpredictable results. Sometimes it will work, sometimes it will not. This is clearly the latter. I do not think the fans are the cause of any of this turmoil, nor do I frankly think that we have exacerbated it.
Whether or not Tru is right in his analysis is likely unknowable – but I do think he raises some excellent points. However, fan reaction, and negativity, is a result of the broken internal team dynamic (whatever its cause), not a cause or contributing factor. If the players want to defy their coach, they will not be persuaded (or dissuaded) by anonymous message board postings.
C! A! T! S! CATS! CATS! CATS!
I
think that fans can for sure can be relentless and bring down your spirits. Honestly though, I feel that Kentucky fans showed that we don’t ask for much other then hard work. Last year we feel in love with a team that was 18-13. I don’t think we are unreasonable. They haven’t shown that they even like being at UK.
I don't care who is coach as long as Kentucky is Kentucky!
You make a great point, NYCcat,
about the wishful thinking that makes fans hope that their actions can can affect the team, for the good or bad. Although I want to agree with you in theory, I do think fan unrest probably does have some small effect..seems like it would be hard for it not to. Not Internet stuff (I have a hard time believing the guys are cruising asob in their free time) so much as the fact that you KNOW half the people the players pass on the streets in Lexington probably have something to say about the team. They go to a party, and a drunk guys slurrs “you guys suck,” the waitress at the place where you get lunch says “what the hell happened against South Carolina, y’all looked awful?” And so on. And seems like that probably would have some affect on a person’s mindset, especially since this team doesn’t exactly appear to have nerves of steel anyway.
What I DON’T think is that you can lay any blame at the fans feet. That’s just a part of playing college basketball, especially at a high profile place like UK. It is what it is. You have to take the good with the bad; the players are practically worshipped when the team is winning, and even when they’re LOSING I have to think the balance of personal attention from fans they get is still far to the positive. Sure, I wish people wouldn’t be jerks about it—more just because it’s embarrasing as a fellow fan than I think it’s, like, shattering the spirit of COach G and the boys—but it is simply not possible to purge that. People are free to be asses, and in any grouping, some minority is going to exercize that right. Just as fans get or deserve any “credit” when the team’s winning, I don’t think they deserve any blame when they’re going to hell.
by blue kentucky girl on Mar 10, 2009 11:56 AM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, okay
Maybe it’s too strong to say that it has NO effect, but I just think it is the pimple on the elephant’s ass that is this season.
C! A! T! S! CATS! CATS! CATS!
It absolutely has an effect
But if what you say is true, and that the fans don’t matter:
1) We might as well stop going to the games and cheering, the home court advantage is nonsense
2) If we don’t stop going, we might as well just go and boo our team, or cheer for the other team at games
3) All of the players interviewed about playing basketball in Kentucky who say “I thought I was prepared for [how big a deal Kentucky Basketball is to the state], but you can’t be, you just have to experience it” and so forth (most recently Darius Miller) are just lying about the influence of the constant press of fan interest and expectations
4) Players like Jared Lorenzen yell up into the stand “Why are you guys leaving, you’re going to miss a hell of a game” to fans leaving early, didn’t do it because they’re frustrated that they fans are walking out on them.
5) Players read these message boards and blogs (and they do read them) because they have too much time on their hands, with team practice, watching film, individual practices, skills development, keeping the co-eds happy, playstation and oh yeah that college thing.
What doesn’t have an effect, is me saying Michael Porter should shoot more. That’s what you’re talking about. The voice of one person just doesn’t matter, and I agree with that. But the sum of all the negativity from all corners can’t help.
And speaking specifically to my point. It’s basic psychology that when people hear something said often enough, they start to believe it, especially when they’re in a vulnerable position (all this losing).
All this negativity totally has an effect, and not a good one.
amen -
just read patterson’s comment in the espn article -
“It’s like playing for Team USA. You’ve got the entire state right in your ear and they don’t care,‘’ Patterson says. "I always say it’s a love-hate relationship. They love us, but they sure do hate us sometimes. My friends call up and say, ’What’s the big deal? So you’re struggling a little bit.’ I tell them, ‘Man you don’t understand. This is Kentucky.’”
don’t tell me the negativity is just a pimple on an elephant’s behind. it is not THE cause of the problems but it has an effect
IMHO – :)
by memphis wildcat on Mar 10, 2009 11:05 PM EDT up reply actions
I put this forth a week or two ago to the sound of crickets
Just look at our home court record. The fans negativity both makes the players nervous at home and emboldens them to play counter to the coach’s instructions.
That May Be But I Saw Them Play In Columbia SC
It was the poorest EFFORT (except Patterson) I have ever witnessed from a UK team in person.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 5:02 PM EDT up reply actions
It was the poorest and dumbest effort
I’ve ever seen from about any team, including Patterson on the dumb part. How many times does a guy have to block your shot before you pump fake?
It's kind of like playing pickup
Sure, you can have a guy who scores 20. But if he doesn’t play smart, you’re getting beat nine times out of ten.
Hope you're right
You lay out a compelling case, and one that I believe may be very close to, if not exactly, the truth. If it is, then things very possibly get better next year. I believe Liggins and Stewart will both leave before next year. It’s clear Liggins isn’t going to get the PT he needs to become the star he thinks he is. (And he may well be a star, but he won’t be until/unless he gets on the same page with his coach, whoever that may be.) Stewart has got to know that he wasn’t getting much playing time this year, and next year he has to compete with all the same guys plus Pilgrim and Orton for PT. So, either he slides over to the Jared Carter section of the bench, or goes somewhere where he can actually play basketball.
On KSR, much has been made of the debate about whether Meeks and Patterson will stay if Coach G leaves. Perhaps the better question is, will they leave if Liggins/Stewart stay. (At this point, I’m assuming they’re at least part of the problem, given that they are the two making headlines. That might not be fair, and I acknowledge that. Perhaps it’s more accurate to say, if the “dissenting party or parties leave”.) Clearly, Meeks and Patterson know how to win. Patterson has never been anything but responsive to coaching, as far as I can tell, and for Meeks to give it his best shot under duress last year says all we need to know about the effort he’s willing to give for this coach. I suspect that if you’re is right, these two are frustrated by playing with players who aren’t willing to do the same. If the dissenters leave, Pat and Jodie ought to be much happier and in a better position to lead.
This may also explain Miller’s lack of development. At the beginning of the year, he seemed to have the fundamentals down and looked more ready to step into his role on this team sooner than any other newcomer. If the rest of the newcomers weren’t ready to accept their roles, that would make it difficult for Darius to play his; hence, he hasn’t been as good as we thought he’d be.
I’m interested to see if there’s any dissent to your post here, Tru, but I think you’re onto something.
I Think (Don't Know)
Liggins is gone. Stewart is gone. Donald Williams is gone. Josh Harrellson may be gone.
Patterson likely to NBA. Meeks less likely.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions
...
Patterson likely to NBA.
Anything inparticular to make you think this? With the way he was dominated by other quality big men like Varnardo, I would think his draft status dropped considerably this year. The injuries didn’t help either, I would think this would make him more likely to return.
Agree on most
I didn’t include Williams because I thought that was already widely accepted, but I agree there. Agree that Harrellson may leave, but if Tru is right, maybe he’s just been in the same boat as Miller – looking for his role. Remember, he hasn’t been playing ball that long. Still, he’ll have the same PT challenges as Stewart next year.
Maybe it’s just hope, but I think both Patterson and Meeks will stay. I think this losing streak has hurt both of their stocks, and I think scouts would like to see Patterson consistently take and hit the mid-range jumper, which he should get a chance to do with Orton coming in. Also, he and Orton are rumored to be very close, and last I heard, he was on track to graduate next year anyway. All good reasons to stay. Still, he’s been injured twice in two years, so that may be incentive to leave. And, unlike Forty, I don’t know his parents, so Forty may know something I don’t.
This
seems to support my thoughts about Patterson: http://www.amnews.com/public_html/?module=displaystory&story_id=48547&format=html
A big turn around from you 40
I remember clearly all the times you stuck with the party line that you heard from Pat’s mom that he would graduate from UK.
Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."
Indeed
She said that to my ears in March 2008 down in Columbia SC.
I didn’t see the Patterson there this year. Don’t know if they were (or not).
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 11, 2009 10:44 AM EDT up reply actions
Donovan
Gets “off the hook” because of 3 FF appearances this decade and back-2-back NC.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 10:58 AM EDT reply actions
Totally
You get a lot of leeway for that. I’d trade Donvan’s results for ours over the last 10 years in a second. Note that he had many tumultuous teams until he found the right formula. (See Walsh and those kinds of teams he had). Coincidentally, that does give some hope for Billy G being able to find the right mix. He has had a ton of success in the past. But this year clearly wasn’t it.
I will say, I still like our guys (Hayes, Bogans, Daneils, etc) better the past 10 years than theirs (Walsh, Calathes, etc). Perhaps having some prima donnas is what you suffer through when putting a championship game together.
Maybe if we give Gillispie some time, we’ll start seeing some Donovan-like results. (I’d take the championship and Final Four parts) On the other hand, Gillispie will start having to recruit as well as Donovan does. Tough call.
You want Donovan results?
Except for two Titles, from a great class apparently, all his other years he was just so so when compared to UK. After that class left ..off to NIT…sorry but I disagree
I guess what I long for is heart…..You know, like the unforgettables…that is what I expected this year. There might be some merit to the fan support thing because why play for a team, if the fans act the way they do on the call in shows, sit on their hands and not cheer on the team……….I am disappointed more in the fans than this team…..I have been thinking this for a while, and that is why I think Tru’s analysis is almost dead on…..listen to a call in show lately? I bet the players have….Just something to think about….fans have heck of a lot more influence than we realize n days…I mean, I have several players on facebook, and while I want to update me status to pissed, I have to think twice because I know they will see that…..
by BlueBloodedCatfan on Mar 10, 2009 7:06 PM EDT up reply actions
Lets be honest
We liked our guys better because they played in Blue and White.
If Chuck Hayes had played for Florida, we would have been all over him for that rape charge before graduation like we were Teddy Dupay (How can you rape someone you love?) last year.
Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."
I think...
that I’m in the minority when I say that I believe the players are as much to blame for this as the coach. As you stated Tru, the things that these players aren’t doing are just simple things. You know BG has to be telling these guys to do them, or maybe he hasn’t because he figured a lot of the things should be common sense. Does anyone remember the guy that played for Duke a few years back, Wojohowski(sp?)? He was one of the toughest, scrappiest players I’ve ever seen. It just seems as if most of our players are all the way on the other end of that spectrum. You don’t teach that. You can’t. NYCats stated in another thread that he believed that there would be a major turnover for this roster and I really hope that he is correct. I’m not going to get into he needs to stay and who needs to go. This team, BG and players included, has been extremely dissapointing. No one gets the blame more than the other in my eyes.
Great piece Tru.
Good column
Players that can’t make basic plays shouldn’t be playing SEC basketball. Billy G is the scapegoat because he’s making the money and to be honest, I know a lot of fans who couldn’t stand him from day one. Ironically, I’ve observed many of them to be white, middle aged males, which my psychology background tells me lends itself to jealousy but that’s another subject.
Back to the column. I’m not sure the Liggins thing was as big of a deal as the fact that our players just aren’t that bright. i’ve heard from a Lexington busy body that the real strife is between Billy G and some of the Tubbyovers, but like most stuff you read on the internet and hear from so and so who heard it from so and so, it’s just talk. I’m not sure that the players aren’t listening as much as they just don’t have it in them. I really feel like Porter and Harris are playing to the best of their abilities, but they shouldn’t have been recruited to UK. Sorry guys, but that’s the truth.
On the fans, heck yes the negativity affects the players. It’s not self serving, it’s a small state and a big program.
Not The Truth At All
Porter was recruited as back-up to SG Meeks and PG Jasper in 2006 class. That’s how he was used in 2007.
Harris is a quality WF defender. He was Gatorade A-A in HS. He’s a UK caliber player.
The so-called Tubbyovers are Meeks, Stevenson, Porter, Carter, and Harris. Stewart was recruited by Tubby but never played for him.
Sorry but I call BS on that. LIGGINS is a much bigger problem child than any of those players.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions
I could outshoot Harris
With my eyes closed. Don’t get me wrong, as I said earlier he and Porter give it their all, but they are not SEC caliber players. Paper champions don’t equate to being a great player. Heck, I’m sure somebody thought Alleyne would be a great player, oh wait, that was us. You call Harris a quality defender but I’ve seen him taken to task several times this year.
More Oscar Mayer On That
Harris is a decent scorer and capable defender. Why else would Gillispie start him over Miller?
Porter was recruited as back-up to Meeks and Jasper. Properly used, he’d be fine.
Alleyne had great potential but his lazy approach to academics prevented his development.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions
Why else would he start him over Miller?
Read Tru’s post above about trust. Miller will be good in time, but he makes a lot of bad plays right now.
Miller Has To Learn Somewhere
Watching Harris play is not how he will learn.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions
when did miller become a point guard?
Rivals has him listed as a SF and a PF…maybe that was updated, but I thought that was his role all along
by BlueBloodedCatfan on Mar 10, 2009 7:20 PM EDT up reply actions
Harris And Miller Are Both "3" Or WF
Miller should be playing ahead of Harris.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 7:29 PM EDT up reply actions
I agree...
with your assessment of Harris, but I believe Porter can be a quality SG. His talents have been hidden due to the position he has been forced to play.
I can agree with that
And that he would be a quality reserve, just not a starter, at least not at PG. But what options do we really have?
Liggins And Galloway
Memphis wanted both of them as PG recruits.
If they’re good enough for Memphis…
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions
Well you've seen them in action
Do they look like sean woods to you? In a full court offense maybe. Galloway makes great passes to wide open players, as designed by Billy G, but nobody can knock down a 15 footer.
He Recruited Them To UK
He must think they are good PG recruits.
Or maybe he’s not a great recruiter after all.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions
I think they are definitely capable
but are not trustworthy of carrying out the Coach’s instructions. I’m sure that Billy does think they are good PGs or else he wouldnt have recruited them. Could be that their attitudes and lack of cooperation and/or ability to follow directions turned out to be more than he bargained for. Does NOT make him a bad recruiter. If he did make a mistake he is not the first and will not be the last. Does not mean that he is not a good recruiter.
I believe in Billy G.
by kentuckygirl0724 on Mar 10, 2009 12:01 PM EDT up reply actions
I think so too.....
Tru did make a good point about how the Liggins and Stewart situations were handled too. These are kids and they are most certainly going to make some bad decisions BUT you have to be held accountable for your actions at the same time or you will never learn or grow.
Giving them immediate PT after they refuse to enter a game or fly off and quit the team is a slap in the face to the other players and I’m certain it doesn’t help team morale either. I certainly hope Billy G has learned from those errors. It’s just a part of the overall problem, but at least it is something you can control.
Oh I totally agree with that
I think it was definitely a mistake for Liggins not to be “punished” for his refusal to enter the game and when Stewart quit he should have had to suck it up and learn the hard way that sometimes you cant take back things that you say or do. I just feel like Billy did what he thought he had to do with the way the season was going. If we had been kicking butt and taking names and had the complete and full support of our fanbase (and apparently players as well) I think those situations would have turned out very differently.
I believe in Billy G.
by kentuckygirl0724 on Mar 10, 2009 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions
Oh yeah........
I think he did what he felt like he had to do. He’s still very young as a coach and learning too. I like you still believe in him and his capabilities and I think he’s probably going to come away with some valuable knowledge from this season. I know nobody wants to hear this but what has happened this season may be just what he’s needed to grow as a coach at this level.
What I don't hear anybody mentioning
Is how young we are as a team. Really no seniors and many juniors that were recruited to be, I guess backups. Let’s not beat them up too much, hopefully they’ll be around for a few more years, at least the sophomores and freshmen.
Young Teams
1 Senior, 5 Juniors.
UK has had successful young teams before.
1968 to name one. There are many others.
2005 is the most recent example.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions
out of the 5
how many are first year? I mean out of prbable starters……this is a very young team. jodie is the only junior to have minutes……other than that???? 1 senior, who is plagued by injuries..bless is heart………but it is what it is……how many have been in the system more and know it more…Patterson, porter, harris, and stevenson….the ones starting….and they only have a year, so it is like they are all sophmores
by BlueBloodedCatfan on Mar 10, 2009 7:25 PM EDT up reply actions
Stevenson, Porter, Harris ALL Played Minutes Last Year
I don’t buy that excuse.
Uk has the talent to W more than 19 games.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 7:30 PM EDT up reply actions
You're absolutely right........
I’m not trying to beat them up. They are still young and need some time as well.
We aren't really all that young.
We have plenty of experience, just no seniors. There are many younger teams in basketball who have performed better than UK this year.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Mar 10, 2009 12:56 PM EDT up reply actions
My only thing about Stewart -
Gillispie said he let the team vote and decide on whether Stewart could come back. That’s EXACTLY what Tubby did when Joe Crawford tried to leave as a freshman, and I thought it’s what he did after Morris’ NBA debacle after his sophomore.
No, AJ is not the caliber of player that Crawford and Morris were, but the “let the players vote and decide” is not a new strategy.
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
--O.W.
Pitino Claims To Use The Same Strategy At Louisville
All coaches (except Bobby Knight and Adolph Rupp) do or did that.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 5:20 PM EDT up reply actions
Normally ...
… you will see players who violate a team rule like that suffer some kind of punishment, though, and be allowed back only after they have paid penance for their judgment failure.
I think that’s the part that was missing, but you can never know for sure.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
I have asked everyone ...
… to stop with the Tubby stuff. If I had been here a bit earlier, I would have deleted this comment for that reason.
You know the rules. Please abide by them. If you must refer to Smith, either do so respectfully or not at all.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Mar 10, 2009 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions
Tru Is Gillispie
Tru, your column truly is representative of an epiphany and I agree for the most part and intend to comment further and more broadly.
You and Gillispie are similar in this respect: Gillispie erred in his disciplining of Liggins and Stewart by not following through. You are doing the same in allowing FortyYearCatFan to incessantly, obsessively insinuate the previous coach into nearly every single discussion. It should be obvious to even the most casual reader that he has a close relationship with Smith and his family and thus feels compelled to defend them. You’ve explicitly asked that he cease and desist, and he continually and willfully defies your quite reasonable request. ASoB will not reach its full potential — perhaps not maintain its current status — as a thoughtful and mature board unless you address the situation
I agree completely
He’s not being treated equally.
AMEN
I have started limiting my comments on this board for this very reason. We know forty’s position on anything related to or even resembling related to Tubby.
I have always had a very high opinion of Tubby and consider him and his family truly class act and a role model for humility and honesty. That doesn’t mean I wasn’t ready for him to go and like many others tired of “Tubby ball”.
If anything, the constant rebuttal’s of forty’s have diminished my high regard for Tubby.
Me thinks he doth protest too much.
I Compare Any UK Coach To UK Standards
All-time standards, that is. That makes UK the #1 program, not this coach or that one.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 5:30 PM EDT up reply actions
Oh come on
Its not as though he threw a inflammatory comment in just to stir the pot. That comment above barely mentions Tubby and even if it did it still did not incite another argument about whether or not Tubby should have been run out.
Someday everyones going to have to face the fact that Tubby is a part of our history at UK. How can we pretend to talk intelligently about Kentucky basketball if even a passing mention of our coach a mere two years removed is blacklisted? We can request people not make a huge argument about it but how can barely mentioning his name be forbidden? Yall want us to call him The-Coach-Who-Shall-Not-Be-Named?
I've usually been content to read and not write as much
BUT I must say the reason I find ASoB to be the best UK blog is because its the most intellectual, the other blogs may be more passionate but they certainly arent civil. I dont need any help with my passion for UK, but I come back for the usually intelligent and civil comments here.
With that said, yall have broken more of the house rules by personally attacking Forty here. I’ve read a lot here and I must say Forty has consistently posted more factual and historical information than probably anyone other poster and I appreciate that contribution. Like it or not, he speaks his mind and backs up his comments with numbers and logic. That shouldnt be censored but encouraged.
OK.
I want to explain this nicely. I am aware the difficulties some have with Smith, but most of you are simply picking nits here. You didn’t complain when Daniel made a reference to “Tubbyovers”, which I took issue with. You see only your side of the argument, and call me to account when I don’t meet your criteria of “fairness”. Sometimes I can’t just wax half the thread, I have to counsel members to desist, sometimes in public and sometimes not. Even if I allow a comment to stand, you can be sure that I either have, or will address it in some form or fashion. If that’s not good enough, you’re in luck — there are other blogs and message boards out there who don’t care what you say.
I don’t appreciate being called out to do things, or for being unfair, over and over again. I would respectfully ask that you would refrain from that. I do the best I can, and if your simply can’t trust the fact that I work very hard to keep everything on an even keel, you’ll just have to comment elsewhere, I guess. Nobody sees all the things I say or do, as I don’t do them all in public. I am only one person, and I try very hard to be fair to everyone. If my efforts don’t meet your standard of perfection, all I can say is that my conscience is perfectly clear on this issue. I am satisfied with my efforts, even if others may not be.
But I recall to you my admonition to respect your fellow members. That is what I require. You may be assured that I am aware of any concerns you may have, and that I am giving them due attention with all possible expeditiousness..
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Why do I have to be the scape goat?
Dude, that’s not fair! :) I thought tubbyovers was a good word.
Look, I can take it with the best, I just think it should be a two way street. I will have to say Tru, when the comment friday was made about the dead boaters and I come back Monday and see my response was taken down but that load of rubbish was allowed to stay, I did have my suspicions. But as you said, it’s your blog.
C'mon, man ...
… just leave Smith out of it. I do it all the time, I know you can, also. It isn’t just Forty, it’s a bunch of people who get pushed out of shape if I say something, or take it as permission to unload if I don’t.
I do the best I can, and that’s it. If it offends, well, c’est la vie. As I said, my conscience is clear. All I can tell you was that I was never picking on you or anyone else. You’ll just have to trust me on that one.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Is it because I'm white?
Is that why you don’t like me? I’m going to this leave Smith out of it anonymous class, hopefully it’s working. It’s just he saw me shooting one day at the Johnson Center and never bothered to give me a chance. All I wanted was a chance Orlando, that’s all. I like your blog Tru and I don’t get bent out of shape over some comments. Most of the time what I say is just a joke, I’m a sarcastic guy but it’s hard to tell emotions on a blog. I like 40 too, you need people to stir it up a little. But when I kid with him, I feel like a little kid trying to get a reaction out of the British guard sitting in front of the royal palace.
Heh.
I just have one word for you, man.
Emoticons, baby, emoticons. :-)
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Tru
I have never questioned your dedication, work ethic, honesty, fairness or ideals set for this blog. In fact, I have never been further than about 5 comments on other blogs before returning to the sanctity of ASOB.
But sometimes – OK, more than sometimes – I want to scream when I have to riff through the statistical plethora of forty’s comments.
I still think he will eventually reveal himself to be HAL (see 2001: A Space Odyssey)
Forty is a smart man.
But he’s not HAL. Too much emotion. He really is a Wildcat fan, and is just like the rest of us. Sometimes we all let ourselves get a little out of control.
As an aside, and not at all in reference to what you in particular, it isn’t always necessary to get the last word. Sometimes, its just better to show your hand and let the other guy deal with it. I learned that lesson by way of pain. Lots of pain. :-)
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Well said Tru
I like both Forty and daniel…but that is so true about getting the last word on a blog. It is not necessary at all.
poor evaluation
I believe you are correct in your “epiphany” but you still have not gotten to the rotten core of the problem. Both coaches,
Smith & Gillispie have failed in their evaluation of potential recruits. Just as in a large business, personnel evaluations are the most difficult aspect when bringing in new employees (players). Smith and Gillispie have both fallen victim to a
malady that affects us all in everyday life. We chose the short term profit (ie, the star guard with problems) rather than taking the time to choose the players who will grow and develop over time. The coaches here and everywhere are not
allowed that luxury, by either the fans or the administration.
EVERY Coach Missed On Some Recruits
Look at some of the pathetic classes signed by Pitino at Louisville just a few years ago.
There is no fair comparison of Smith to Gillispie (based on entire careers).
Tubby 72% W-L record, 69% in NCAA games, 9 Sweet 16, 4 Elite 8, 7 conference titles, 6 conference tourney champs, and 1 NCAA title.
Gillispie 62% W-L record, 43% in NCAA games, 1 Sweet 16, 1 conference title. That’s it. That’s all.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 11:27 AM EDT up reply actions
I thnk you are wrong on both counts.
Smith was inconsistent, but he generally got quality recruits.
Gillispie has also done that. The problem is no the talent, but the execution. That’s what you’re missing.
We have a couple of big talent holes that should have been filled but weren’t, namely point guard. But if you read what I wrote, you will see that it is because of the failure of the talented recruits we have to take instruction.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Mar 10, 2009 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions
tru - the other quote you could have used
was that patterson saying they ignored the film and game plan for the ole miss game – but then played better when they looked at the play for their next game. something like that.
BCG needs to figure out what motivates players. still believe recruiting is a bit of a crap shoot. it took billy d time to get to his back to back NC (yes i know he went to FF early in his career).
although your article rings true – it still adds up to frustration and the need for patience
by memphis wildcat on Mar 10, 2009 11:54 AM EDT reply actions
Agree and disagree (per usual)
I agree that at least on the offensive side of the ball the Cats are not executing what they have been taught. As far as I can tell they are not executing any kind of offense at all. Since I refuse to believe that Gillespie has not taught any offense, then by default the players must not be executing the offensive scheme. That being said, I disagree with you on the reasons why and further disagree that there is not at least some failure of coaching, at least on the defensive part of the ball.
I don’t think that internal dissent is the proximate cause of this team’s problems this year. That is not to say there is no internal dissention, because at this point in the season it seems clear that the players are unhappy. But such end of season dissention is basically a normal reaction when a team does significantly poorer than expected. And clearly there were problems with Liggins and possibly others earlier in the year. However, during several points in the season Gillespie commented that this was the best practicing team that he ever had. I don’t think BG would have said this if there was a mutiny happening amongst some of the players. Based on what Gillespie has said, it appears that everything was fine during practices, which I assume means that the players were taking directions just fine as well. Thus, the failure to execute which we have all witnessed would seem to be happening only during the games. To me, that is not a symptom of mutiny, but rather a symptom of a lack of leadership on this team. And to be fair, there is only so much a coach can do to develop leadership. In the end, whether a person becomes a leader or not depends on individual personality, and I just don’t think any of the experienced players has stepped up and become effective leaders for the younger players. During practice, the coach can micromanage everything and essentially be the on-the-court leader. But during the games, the players have to execute for themselves. I just don’t see or here much talking going on out there during the games and you never see any player getting on any other player for making stupid mistakes. I may be wrong, but that is what I see on the offensive side of the ball.
The defensive side of the ball is another story. As far as I can tell, other than a few mistakes a game, the defense generally executes what the coach has designed. The problem is that the defense is the same, every single play. No defense is perfect, every defense has exploitable weaknesses. By playing the same defensive scheme on every possession, BG has allowed opposing coaches to implement offensive plays late in the season exclusively designed to beat the BG defense. I mean, its a no-brainer to me that if I have already installed the offensive scheme, I might as well throw in a few new plays guarantee that the weak side 3 is going to be open every time. I think BG’s failure to ever switch the defense is a major coaching mistake/malpractice. Yes, he has won at other programs using this defense, but as a certain annoying poster will be glad to tell you, BG has not exactly been successful in the post-season so far in his career.
P.S – I haven’t posted here in quite awhile. The reason is because a certain poster makes every single discussion a debate about why a certain ex-coach is better than a certain current coach. I personally think that by trying to show everyone who makes anything that can possibly be construed as a dig against a certain former coach that they are wrong/stupid this poster is engaging in cyber-bullying, which is against this forum’s rules. The thing is, I personally agree with the views of this poster, but I think the need to defend a certain coach over and over again, ad nauseum is unnecessary. Let people have their own opinions, even if they are wrong, as long as they are not bashing anyone. Not only that, it is incredibly annoying and boring to read.
the REAL fake Mr. Bob Dobalina
Formerly known as "senowen"
I Think Gillispie Is In WAY Over His Capabilities At UK
Let’s discuss THAT.
Mike Casey agrees. How about you?
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 12:14 PM EDT up reply actions
Baiting
Yet ANOTHER infraction.
I believe in Billy G.
by kentuckygirl0724 on Mar 10, 2009 12:17 PM EDT up reply actions
Poster Asked What I Thought Of Gillispie
Based on first 2 years, I think he’s FAR over his head at UK level of coaching.
Worse than Sutton even.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions
No, Forty, he didn't.
His quote from above:
“P.S – I haven’t posted here in quite awhile. The reason is because a certain poster makes every single discussion a debate about why a certain ex-coach is better than a certain current coach. I personally think that by trying to show everyone who makes anything that can possibly be construed as a dig against a certain former coach that they are wrong/stupid this poster is engaging in cyber-bullying, which is against this forum’s rules. The thing is, I personally agree with the views of this poster, but I think the need to defend a certain coach over and over again, ad nauseum is unnecessary. Let people have their own opinions, even if they are wrong, as long as they are not bashing anyone. Not only that, it is incredibly annoying and boring to read.”
Nowhere in there does bluesquire ask your opinion on Gillispie.
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
--O.W.
Clipped
“…debate about why a certain ex-coach is better than a certain current coach.”
My point (all along) is that Gillispie has not shown much, if any indication that he measures up to UK standards.
Heck, even Eddie Sutton won 69% of his UK games (63% of his NCAA games), 1 SEC title, and 2 SECT champiosnhips. I’d be reasonably OK with THOSE numbers being met.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 5:00 PM EDT up reply actions
what school did sutton come crawling from?
how many years did he have coaching prior to coaching at UK?
sutton
made Arkansas into more then just a football school. He had the pedigree to coach here. Had he not cheated I think he would have done some great things for UK.
Forty, I am tired of hearing how BG doens’t have the pedigree to coach here. You list of all these coaches that do……well they had to start somewhere. I do not fault Mitch for hiring him at all. He turned around two programs. Tournyes or no tourney he turned the program around. Our success is based on tourneys because of our rich tradition……….places that he was at were just happy to go to tourneys. Anyway, BG is the epitamy of what we want a UK coach to be. That is eat live breathe basketball. Hard working and strong. I actually laugh when he tells the media off. It doens’t bother me one bit. He is never like Jim C or John Cal. I dont’ want some suck up that cares more about his image then what goes on the court. BG was the best hire that we could have gotten. With that said……….for whatever reason RIGHT NOW its not working. Who knows why? If he is too abusive then he goes and I say good riddance………..if he isn’t abusive and its the players who aren’t listening then I say let him stay and get his own players and work his own system. BG will do good things for a school whether its Kentucky or another school.
I don't care who is coach as long as Kentucky is Kentucky!
I Disagree
And I said he was the least qualified of any UK “replacement” coaches, not that he didn’t have any pedigree.
I’m sorry but the UK coach should be one of the Top 5 or 10 coaches in college basketball.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 11, 2009 10:08 AM EDT up reply actions
i do not disagree with you forty
but were joe b, sutton, pitino or tubby one of the top 5 coaches in the land at the time of their being hired?
i could make a case that pitino and maybe sutton were top 10 (pitino and sutton had both taken teams to FF), but joe b had not coached and tubby (while successful at tulsa and uga) may or may not have been (tubby was a top 15 to 20 coach, so maybe splitting hairs on him).
I will will agree that BCG was a bigger “bet” – if you will – than the others. but i still believe coming to UK and being successful was what made the other coaches solid top 5 to 10 – NOT what they did before hand.
by memphis wildcat on Mar 11, 2009 12:03 PM EDT up reply actions
I Said Top 5 OR 10
Hall, it was a different time. The #1 assistant was often promoted then.
Sutton, yes. One of the best coaches of 70’s and 80’s.
Pitino, certainly. Ditto to above (but just 80’s).
The coach I cannot name, no. Not Top 10 then. He was hired because of UK experience (assistant in 1990 and 91) and 3 Sweet 16 (94-95-96). CM Newton made the choice. Many of players wanted Donovan then. Pitino actually recommended Ralph Willard.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 11, 2009 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions
probably means the AD is where it all starts
i give barnhart more credit for his hires than most – but in the other cases (football, baseball, women’s bball) he was picking guys/ladies that could build a program. hopefully, his next hire for men’s bball will not be that type of hire…..hopefully, it will be to pick a coach in 8 years that will come in to work on hanging banner #9……
oh – and for a minute i thought i was reading harry potter when i read your post :)
by memphis wildcat on Mar 11, 2009 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions
About 15 Years (I Think)
He re-built Creighton into a solid mid-major program that has persisted ever since.
He built Arkansas into a powerhouse in the 70’s and 80’s that laid the groundwork for Nolan Richardson to make them an Elite team in the 90’s. He won national COY honors in 1978.
He re-built Okla St into a program of some national prominence after failures by Leonard Hamilton there.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 11, 2009 10:11 AM EDT up reply actions
I agree for the most part
that he has shown serious weaknesses in his coach philosophy and ability thus far. Both this year’s team and last year’s team has more talent than their record shows. The failure to develop leadership on this year’s team is at least partially on BG’s head and as I stated above, I think his defensive incalcitrance is a major error.
the REAL fake Mr. Bob Dobalina
Formerly known as "senowen"
I don't know what incalcitrance means
But all I know is it seems like teams can’t miss against us, no matter if someone is in their face or not. Leading the SEC in turnovers I think is the most obvious problem. You’re defense is going to look bad when they’re having to defend 15-20 more possessions a game.
His First 2 Years Are Quite Disappointing
I fear Mitch made a mistake. UK coaches should be BOTB. Prior FF or multiple Sweet 16, or part of the UK “family” already.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions
A mistake?
At the time, what available coach would you have hired, forty? (Using hindsight is not allowed)
Any Of A Dozen Possibilities
Gillispie is too inexperienced for UK level IMO.
That’s IMO yours can be different.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 7:32 PM EDT up reply actions
Calipari, Izzo, Crean, Guys Like That
FF experience. NBA style of play. Multiple conference titles and tourney champs, etc.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 10:24 PM EDT up reply actions
because
they have established themselves at those schools and we are ego maniacs thinking that everyone wants to come to the GREAT KENTUCKY!
I don't care who is coach as long as Kentucky is Kentucky!
Crean would have jumped at it
And Izzo’s name comes up for every “Elite” opening. It wouldn’t if there weren’t at least an inkling of a possibility there.
Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."
Well, Crain I Know Something About
My HS Latin teacher was his ultimate boss at Marquette.
Crean has developed a reputation of being VERY tough to work with and for.
But he is a VERY good coach and will show that at IU.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 11, 2009 10:46 AM EDT up reply actions
Okay, you named 3
Who are the other nine?
BTW – I can’t see Cal at UK. Folks were leery of a “yankee” coaching at UK at the time but he pulled it off with success and a good relationship with the media (kinda goes hand ‘n hand). Cal’s had trouble with Memphis media and would implode at the scrutiny at Ky. Izzo wouldn’t leave Mich. Crean is a possible but not sure if he really got any real consideration with his ongoing success at Marquette.
He could be
Or he might be about to break out a 7 game winning streak, that’s the beauty of sports, you just never know.
Knock it off, Forty.
You’re beginning to run out of rope.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
I'll admit
That when I heard the choice, I was a bit puzzled. But I’m on the bandwagon now, drinking the kool aid and asking for more, i don’t really like the alternatives.
No Alternatives For 2-3 Years
UK would like foolish to change coaches this soon.
UNC endured Matt Doherty for 3 years. UCLA endured Steve Lavin twice as long.
Both survived and are now prospering with new coaches.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions
That's what people don't understand
No coach in his right mind is going to come here if Billy G gets fired after two years considering the pressure Smith endured towards the end, too.
Correcting That Impression
The former UK coach felt no pressure different in 2006 or 2007 than any other year at UK.
His family got SICK of it. But it really never bothered him.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions
ahhh
so we hired a coach with no family! epiphany! :)
LOL If U Want But That IS A Factor
Every other UK coach in my lifetime had a family. I think it matters.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 3:00 PM EDT up reply actions
Still Coaching
If the players are not running the offense/defense they way you want, it is your resposibility to get them to do so.
Lost Control
Billy lost control of this team when He didn’t punish any of the above player actions.
There is nothing wrong that a string of W's wouldn't fix!
Behind closed doors
You have to wonder if there is even more going on behind closed doors than what has come to light.
His Statement Yesterday
I know what is wrong should have told us. He will start fresh next year. He will lose a few players but,He will lay the law down at the start.
There is nothing wrong that a string of W's wouldn't fix!
Why should he have told us?
He has no reason to do so, and many reasons not to.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Maybe he doesn't want to tip his hand
Since we’re about to win four straight in the SEC tourney and then make the sweet 16.
I'd drink..........
to four straight in the SECT and the Sweet 16 right now if it weren’t for this darn work thing…………lol.
I think.......
Tru, I think oldcat was trying to say that Gs statements should have told us there’s more going on behind closed doors. I don’t think he meant we as fans should have been told……..
Ah ...
… Well, if that’s the case, then he’s right.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Thanks Slide
That is exactly what I was trying to say.
There is nothing wrong that a string of W's wouldn't fix!
Agreed.....
Next year will tell the tale. I choose to believe that he will take some hard lessons learned from this season and make some positive changes.
Next Year Will Tell the Tale?
If we lose Meeks, Patterson, Liggins, and Stewart, next year will look pretty grim to me.
Take a Deep Breath...
I’ve been visiting this site for almost two years now, and I would first like to say that I enjoy the rational approach taken by most on this site, and the fine examples provided by Tru and Ken.
I know that everyone has their dander up nowadays over the performance this season of not only the coach, but also the players. I won’t presume to take sides on who is to blame, for the Wildcats are a team, and it is as a team that they have faltered. Deep down, I still think that, despite Forty’s adept numerical analysis that appears to indicate BCG is BQA (a below-qualified applicant) for the j-o-b, my gut tells me that he can and will get it done. The program was listing beneath the guidance of Smith (in my opinion the talent base was steadily spiraling downward), and has taken on a lot of water in this season, in particular. Perhaps BCG’s maneuvers haven’t righted the ship yet, but I believe that with the successful recruitment of talented and dedicatedKentucky Wildcat players, things will improve. We need to have young men who are willing to listen and work a la Patterson, Harris and Meeks. Not people who place themselves above the team like Liggins and Stewart have done this year. I applaud BCG for showing benevolence and patience with those young men, but there comes a time when changes need to be made for the betterment of all parties involved. Granted, the way Pitino handled Sosa was more savory, but the bottom line is the same—Get with the Program, or get Out.
Most of us can think back to times in our lives where things just didn’t go well, despite our best efforts. Be it in sports, home life, or in our employment, there have been times that, despite our best efforts, things just went into the tank and seemed to ferment. I believe that this has happened this year to UK. BCG brought in athletes, the best he could get on short notice to fill the gaps, but it wasn’t enough. Instead of gelling, this team began to ferment. We need a few new ingredients to change the composition, and time is one of those ingredients, along with the introduction of a strong catalyst, which might just initiate the chain reaction we are all expecting. Granted, I don’t know where this elusive element is going to come from, but perhaps the hunger of our new recruits along with a coach that has been properly seasoned by the UK pressure cooker will get things moving forward next year.
I think we all need to step back, take a deep breath, and remember that the state of this program two years ago was “Decline”. Our expectations this year have not been met, and I would be willing to bet that BCG’s expectations have not been met as well. We now have a coach who is hungry, a coach who believes in himself (at least that is my optimistic view of why he does not initiate the changes all of the fans/novice coaches have proposed) and a coach who will work hard for success.
Let’s see what happens when BCG has a few more players on the floor that he can TRUST, but who have the talent to be able to make big things happen. Let’s see what happens when some of the negativity subsides, and perhaps when some of the mutineers have walked the plank. If BCG can get Joe Crawford to play the way he did last year, I believe he can get a team of Joe Crawford’s to satisfy our expectations.
Guts, And Stats, And Wishes Won't Matter
Results will matter. Gillispie has to produce results over the next 2-3 years.
Eddie Sutton was marvelously successful at Arkansas and Oklahoma St, too. He won over 800 games in his career.
But his UK results were subpar by UK standards.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions
disagree on two points
Guts matter. That is what allows you to play through pain, through distractions, and when you are down by 40 on an opponents home floor.
Stats matter. You use them craftily, and “results” are only viewed through the haze of numbers. Stats got Tubby the job at UK. I’m sure they were instrumental in illustrating BCG’s success at the time he was interviewed at UK.
Wishes, well, there is a saying about having a wish in one hand, but I think this site is above that type of behavior.
Misinterpreted "Guts" Meaning
Your gut feelings, my gut feeling don’t matter. RESULTS matter.
Stats matter historically. But the 1998 team and 2009 team have SIMILAR overall stats. Check on Jon Scott website. You’ll be amazed how similar the numbers are.
Just very different results.
RESULTS got every prior UK coach their job in Lexington, not stats.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions
clarity
I didn’t misinterpret, you weren’t totally clear. With your follow-up, I can only agree. Instincts are irrelevant unless you are in a position to put them into play.
You’re splitting hairs on results vs. stats. As I said, they are one and the same. One illustrates the other.
Why Did UK Hire Pitino?
Stats? I don’t think so.
FF at Providence and NBA playoffs at NY Knicks?
I think so.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions
I think Bankshot is right about the hair-splitting
The stats are illustrating the results. The stat illustrating the result you list would be X Final Fours and X NBA playoffs in X years coaching.
by blue kentucky girl on Mar 10, 2009 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions
Tark Doesn't Like Kentucky
But a coach LIKE HIM, absolutely. Wins almost 80% of his games. Strong NCAA contender most years at UNLV.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions
I Don't Agree With That
Actually Tark called out NCAA for letting UCLA, UK (et al) with violating their rules and hammered others for doing so.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 3:21 PM EDT up reply actions
I Doubt He Was An Angel
But he was more upset about others getting away with cheating.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 3:46 PM EDT up reply actions
Stats, Results
Stats. Pitino was 42-23 in 2 years at Providence. 90-82 in 2 years at NY Knicks.
Results. Pitino made FF at Providence, 1st time since 1973. Pitino led NYK into NBA playoffs.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 2:24 PM EDT up reply actions
well....
…their W-L ratio was way below UK standards. I just dont think Davie Crockett is a UK caliber coach….
I feel like I'm bantering with a six year old....
So my final statement regarding your Results vs. Stats is that those results you reference, Final Four trips, NBA finals trips, those results become a Statistic. Forty, you have a difficult time conceding a point sometimes, but your posts are always provocative.
Stats And Results Are Different
In my job, I keep track of How Many Fire Losses (And What Caused Them) for my insurance company (employer). Those are STATS.
The financial department uses my stats (and others) to report RESULTS (profits, U/W ratios, expense ratios, etc) in terms of Profit or Loss.
If my STATS show we had fewer fires but our RESULTS show a Net Loss anyway, you get the point (I think).
Results are different than stats.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 11, 2009 9:59 AM EDT up reply actions
Hey Forty
Do you possibly keep earthquake stats for Tennessee and or Kentucky? I am talking about the New Madrid fault and the likelihood of a devastating EQ. I just deleted that coverage from my homeowners policy this year to save plus $200/yr.
Not a bad move
Typically, an earthquake would have to be competely devastating for the coverage to kick in.
I read up on it quite a bit after the earthquake that hit about this time last year.
Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."
maybe that's what the cats need
to be shakin up a bit =) haha i know….corny.
The one in April last year, it was like someone put a quarter in the bed haha!
Oh it was felt where I live
Mostly by my friends living in frame homes and out towards the lake. I never felt a thing just heard a very strange noise and then it was gone. Did not even know about the EQ until the next day.
Not Really
Most EQ coverage has % deductible instead of fixed amount.
But EQ damage of $50K or so would probably result in $30K to $40K claim.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 11, 2009 9:35 PM EDT up reply actions
Yes - EQ Are Rare But Devastating Along New Madrid Fault
Every 200 years (or so) there is a MONSTER quake along it. St Louis and Memphis will see MAJOR damage because their codes do not measure to Calif codes.
We are due for New Madrid quake in first half of 21st Century.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 11, 2009 9:33 PM EDT up reply actions
Texas A&M player compares Turgeon to Billy G
From John Clay’s blog:
http://johnclay.bloginky.com/2009/03/10/texas-am-player-compares-turgeon-to-billy-g
GBB!!!
Turegon Is A Good, Young Coach
So was Gillispie (and may be again).
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions
I may not be that smart, but
here is what I wrote after the Liggins situation:
Look I think there is a happy medium. It lies somewhere from banishment and doing nothing at all (yea I know….we just don’t know what’s going on in practice). Sitting him down one game is a good ‘medium’ choice of punishment. Is Billy that desperate for one solitary win????
Billy chose to make this issue public in the conference after the game…therefore, it placed him in a position that he needed to follow through in a public way. He didn’t chose to do it which hurts him….and the team eventually.
by HozeKing on Dec 3, 2008 1:13 PM PST
Admitedly, it was easier for me to take this postion since I am not emotionally invested as most are about the Cats, but I did see it as an issue moving forward.
Another problem that I see or saw is that Gillispie is in the ‘recruiting vortex’. He has made and is continually making short term recruiting moves by either reaching down into the Juco’s (i.e., Galloway, Harrelson, Pilgrim) which are not paying off. He continues to offer ‘second tiered’ recruits scholarships because he has open spots. This will continue with this year’s likely departures….especially with the addtional pressure he will face at the end of the year.
He also seems to fall into the trap by not recruiting to the current team gaps. He has needed both shooters and point guards but his recruiting hasn’t addressed these needs.
'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'
recruiting
I guess I would like to understand your position a little more thoroughly on the “recruiting vortex”….
Can you tell me who BCG could have gone for other than Liggins/Galloway?Harrelson at the time? Wha
Who did we pass on that we could realistically have gotten?
Who are the second-tiered recruits? Ferguson? Darius Miller? Certainly not Orton….Hood?
Just trying to totally understand where you are coming from….
Exactly, Forty.
He could have sat on those openings as well and banked them for the following year.
'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'
Pitino Often Sat On Openings
Then filled them with transfers.
Travis Ford. Mark Pope. Derek Anderson. Heshimu Evans. (Not Pitino but) Patrick Sparks.
Each filled a valuable spot at UK.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions
sitting on it
I would have to say that in hindsight, sitting on a scholarship or two probably wouldn’t have been a bad idea. I have to agree with HozeKing that at the time he went for the best available athlete. Just hasn’t produced UK type results. Yet.
Didn't Pass, Just Missed A Few
2nd tier recruits are D Williams, Pilgrim, Harrellson, even Galloway. None was 1st choice.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 2:00 PM EDT reply actions
so....
Would that be more due to the fact that BCG didn’t recognize the talent, or that the talent had been recruited for a longer period by others?
I think he certainly saw that he was in a difficult position.
He saw that the team was lacking talent and did his best by making short term decisions on recruits. It just didn’t work out.
'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'
..and again, he is going to face the same situation this year.
He will have a few last minute openings and many if not most of the first year recruits are committed. What is unfortunate, he may not have the time to ‘bank’ these openings for the following year.
'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'
Not The Latter (Gillispie Has Been Recruiting Since 2003)
Maybe the former.
I’d say he made some recruiting mistakes in 2008 class.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions
going to have to agree to disagree on this point
i still say the type of recruit BCG was focused on for TAMU was not the same as the recruit he will be able to focus on at UK – as a result, he was behind when recruiting for the 2008 class. also, to the extent BCG was focused on texas kids, that might not necessarily translate into coming to kentucky.
as i recall, liggins and galloway were spring signees. Miller, being a kentucky kid, was easier to jump into the recruiting process. my point is that liggins and galloway could have been recruiting by him at TAMU but miller never would have popped up on the radar. with Miller being the “best” of the 3 (so far), we need to see what bdg can do
that being said, 2008 is his class but there will be no excuses with the 2009 class
by the way forty – you never did post your opinion of who the leaders were on the championship teams – would love to see your list
by memphis wildcat on Mar 10, 2009 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions
I Was Told Not To Do So (Which I Honored)
But per your request:
1948 and 49 – Ralph Beard. Others might pick Cliff Barker.
1951 – Bill Spivey. Hands down, I think.
1958 – Johnny Cox. Others might pick Vernon Hatton.
1978 – Kyle Macy. Hands down but Givens maybe.
1996 – Anthony Epps. Most would pick Tony Delk?
1998 – Jeff Sheppard. Hands down for him, too.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions
thanks
interesting that macy was a sophmore (right?) on a team loaded with seniors, but was still the glue. i had said givens or robey, but said the macy was the PG and the glue as i recall -
i thought mccarty was a good behind the scenes leveling factor – maybe not enough to be the leader. also, i guess wayne turner was too young.
interesting how the PG position is so important. maybe that sheds light on why BCG is so focused on getting guards committed – with liggins and galloway, maybe it was a bit of a “land grab” to get some kids in house to choose from. also, aren’t the younger kids he committed guards.
maybe that is the answer to what he thinks is causing the TOs – we have no SEC level PG.
by memphis wildcat on Mar 10, 2009 2:36 PM EDT up reply actions
LOL
Hands down but Givens maybe.
60% of the time….. Every time!
By That I Meant
Macy, hands down IMO.
Others might pick Givens.
Givens was on 77 team, Macy wasn’t.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions
Yes
…to both questions (if I understand your second question). As Forty mentions, this can be a legitimate strategy, but only if it works. It hasn’t for him or the program. You can get late recruits that are left behind by others or dip down into the Juco’s, but it is a risky option.
'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'
Does anyone know if the SEC tourney games will be available on Yahoo! like they were last year?
Please!!
good question
I’m also interested in the answer.
I did notice a day or so ago that the Raycom web site is doing live feed of ACC tourney games but not SEC.
Billy is still learning and he gets better every year. This year was a learning experience for him. He will bring us many banners in the future. He could even pull something off this year.
I hope your right
But Billy seems to have many internal problems. His own statement that He could only play men that He trusted said it all.
There is nothing wrong that a string of W's wouldn't fix!
I Would Have A Different View
Better in 2004 than 2003.
Better each year at TAMU from 2005 to 2007.
Worse this year than last year at UK.
Many Banners = Adolph Rupp.
3 other UK coach each added 1 banner.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions
No.
Just busy with life. Something will be coming very soon, I spoke to him yesterday.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
I'm out of here
Gone to cut up more ice storm damage.
There is nothing wrong that a string of W's wouldn't fix!
Heh.
I need to do more of that. If I can ever get unburied from projects.
Too much blogging.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Hire what out?
My work? Impossible. I am one of maybe 500 people in the US that could do what I do, and virtually all of them are competitors. It’s not that I am so knowledgeable, it’s just the combination of a number of factors make me a bit of a rare commodity.
Hire out blogging? That might happen. :-)
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
OOOHHH!
Doh!
Well, great idea. Except we tried, and the guy failed to show up. I decided to heck with them, I would get a chain saw and start making like Leatherface, only to trees, not people. :-)
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Hopefully the old version
The new one isn’t that great, except for Jessica Beil Daniel 81, we were hitched last week. She just doesn’t know it yet.
You'll like it
It’s eerie as only the old horror movies can be. Now a days it’s all just torture porn.
Omg
I have never liked the horror movies. How in the world can anyone sleep after watching those movies? I had a difficult time with the Carrie and Damien movies.
About the only thing I can watch anymore without nightmares is Law and Order and NCIS, and sometimes they do not do well in my dreams.
The Omen
Does creep me out. Most horror movies are just funny if you get past the over the top brutality. I’m not really a big fan either.
But I do have nightmares
Where I’m applying for a job at this awesome company and I’m sitting across the desk from the boss, about to get hired, and then all of sudden Forty comes stomping in and slams a folder down on the desk. The boss opens it up and starts spewing out stats from my junior pro days, even that time I accidentally shot at the wrong goal, and then moves on to the amount of church league softball games I’ve been tossed out of.
Doesn't add up
If you’re saying that Gillispie is forced to play the worse athletes because they’re the only ones who will follow his instructions, how to you explain the starters failing to follow his presumed instructions? In the Florida game, porter harris and stevenson were the ones doing the most passing around the perimeter and not attacking the zone defense. Against South Carolina, in was porter who kept running the offense inefficiently, and patterson and stevenson who kept refusing to pump fake or go hard to the rim, causing each to get blocked several times.
Coaches CHOOSE Who Plays And Who Sits
No one forces them to play certain players and sit others on the bench.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions
I can't explain it.
Perhaps the trust is merely a matter of degree. He trusts them more than the others, but they are still hard of hearing or comprehension.
There are really only two possibilities. One is that they aren’t following instructions. The other is that Gillispie isn’t giving them any and is just lying about it in the media. If that were so, I have a feeling that others would be aware of the deception, so that pretty much only leaves one possibility.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Because he cares
about defense, rebounding, diving for balls, and that sort of thing more than offense.
You do a great job.
Sometimes I go for weeks at a time without remembering to read your blog, but each time I do come here I end up asking myself why that is. I have no answer for that.
While I don’t agree with you 100% of the time, I do enjoy reading Kentucky articles written from an interesting, different, and intelligent point of view. Thanks for doing this, and I will again make an extra effort to get here more often.
You're always welcome ...
… whether you agree with me or not.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
I have thought about this today
and tru, I think you make a very good case. If that is the problem and these players are not executing what they are being told then I totally agree. I think what the other side of this is…..if what the Texas A&M player is saying is true…..then that could be the problem. The kids could feel so nervous at being yelled at/pulled that they are making mistakes then that couild be the problem and powers that be need to tell BG,…….calm it down or you will be shown the door. Being a bully doens’t make you a good coach. That doens’ tmean he should be soft, but other coaches get to their players without being a bully.
I don't care who is coach as long as Kentucky is Kentucky!
Well ...
Patrick Patterson does not seem to have a problem doing what he is told. It simply beggars belief that he is the only one on the team capable of understanding what Gillispie is teaching. Ramon Harris seems to have no trouble figuring out what to do. He drove the ball to the basket at Florida, something Gillispie made a priority for them to do.
The problem is, nobody flashed into the middle of the zone. That would normally be Perry Sevenson, but he just didn’t do it, for some reason. He went out to the top of the key , above the defense. Not the right place to be.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
If
these guys arent’ being yelled at then they might not have the same problem. I don’t know……..we are all grasping at straws. Just trying to figure out what is wrong. We just need to sit back and see what happens. But I don’t think that its purely a player problem. Its player and coach.
I don't care who is coach as long as Kentucky is Kentucky!
Speaking of Perry not obeying orders
We were down (can’t remember who) by 1 shot and we were getting ready to inbound the ball. Gillispie first tried the “draw a charge on the inbound and get free-throws” trick which didn’t work, then they called a time-out. Next, Perry was inbounding the ball, had some trouble inbounding it, then threw it to Meeks, who was up really close.
Gillispie said in the post-game that the plan was to call time-out if they couldn’t get it up the floor, and Perry didn’t execute that, because he thought Meeks could get it up the court.
CONGRATS!
to A Sea of Blue for a mention on ESPN College Basketball’s homepage. This follows below… The article itself is worth the read (just wish this reference could be in happier times….)
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/columns/story?columnist=oneil_dana&id=3967418
GREAT article
but wow, what a downer. I’m sad that this season has so clearly becomes a dirge for the players and the fans too.
by blue kentucky girl on Mar 10, 2009 7:52 PM EDT up reply actions
Great article
Well-researched and accurate. You can see why she’s in the newsroom and not up there as one of the talking heads with Seth Davis and Vitale.
Sad to read it though.
After Saturday's game ...
I would have carried the rail to haul Gillispie out of town. After a few days and reading this post, I can agree with most of what Tru has said. I’m not sure that fan negativity has that much affect on a team unless the coach has already lost control though. Our best bet as fans is to take a step back, hope for some improvement in the way this year’s team executes, and see what happens after the season and next year. If things are not better, my offer to carry the rail still stands.
UK president: No discussion of Gillispie's job status until season is over
“I think every Kentucky fan is concerned, including the coach, including the athletic director,” he said. “We didn’t do nearly as well in the last half of the season as we did in the first half. That’s pretty obvious.”
http://www.kentucky.com/181/story/721248.html
GBB!!!
Heh.
Well, that article was about as informative as a blank sheet of paper. :-)
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Wouldn't read too much into that story
UK president is just merely stating the obvious. Of course everyone is concerned. That article was just bait, IMO
I Didn't Write It
Just a disclaimer…
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 10, 2009 8:15 PM EDT up reply actions
Funny, but
I also had an epiphany yesterday. Gillispie made a comment or two last season in regards to his “boot camp” and game-day practices that he likes to tear his players down and build them back up to the exact image he desires, or something along those lines. My epiphany was that Coach G tore this team down with mind games and a quick hook, but he has failed to build it back up again. I’m not sure if that’s coaching failure or player resistance, but ultimately the blame has to lay at the coach’s feet for that. It’s a risk anytime you tear something down in hopes of rebuilding it exactly to your liking. The risk is increased when you’re talking about the confidence & psyche of young men.
Indeed.
That is surely a plausible scenario. His hook, in my opinion, is way, way to quick.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Fan negitvity
I just don’t buy into the idea that fan negitivity had anything to do with the collapse this season. Something happened with this team after the 5-0 SEC start. BG said a couple of days ago that he knew what the problem was but wasn’t saying. I doubted that earlier but maybe he does know. All I know is,this team changed,especially in defensive intensity and on the boards. Some players just flat disappeared(Perry Stevenson). I just don’t agree with the notion that fans being negitive brought this on. And really,as a life long Cat fan I am getting tired of being blamed for it. We went through this with Tubby leaving,which we got blamed for. I just want a winner. I want us back among the elite. Is that so bad??
I actually doubt ...
… fan negativity started the slide. It may have been some factor in prolonging it, though.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Just a slight correction Tru
You have always said you wanted to know. In the first sentence…their should be they. I noticed a minor other one, but we can’t be perfect.
I truly appreciate your love and dedication to this blog. I think many of us would be lost souls at this time without your and Ken’s insight and many of the members here.
Thank you.
Disagree
I dont think it is willful disobedience. I think the gameplan just doesnt cater to the strengths of this team, and they simply cannot execute it a high level. They arent quick or tough or strong, and those traits are necessary to play the type of defense BG wants.
Possibly.
This is all speculation anyway.
But I do believe there is some willful disobedience. Your mileage may vary.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Gillispie said
This was the only team he has coached that he didn’t know what they were going to do on the floor game to game. That pretty much sums it up.
THANK YOU TRU for another intelligent view (ha, that rhymes) on our beloved Cats written with true wisdom on the subject.
He has said that many times this season.
Don’t think many heard it and comprehended what he was saying.
I feel like the most mature players on the team
are Patterson and Meeks. It shows sooooo much. Miller will get there I believe, he’s still just a freshman. I smell attitude when Stewart and Liggins hit the floor though.
DE Plane
and fantasy island is what you are all on. Face it this team or should I say non team is as disfunctional as any family should be. Get rid of the problems and we are all family again :)
Pain - Replay
For those interested and have The Big 10 Network, the MSU v UK regional final game from 2005 is being replayed right now. Another heartbreaking UK tourney loss.
Slower Traffic Keep Right!
That was a hard one to take
Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."
Kentucky Boys
There are three players from Kentucky playing major roles for their teams on tv right now? Do you think Gillispie wishes he’d recruited Tilford, Mack, and Pettigrew right now?
Well written, but you miss your own point
What you describe is either a team in petulant mutiny, or a coach who doesn’t inspire.
Which is more likely?
We're all just a banana peel away from eternity.
No ...
Welcome to A Sea of Blue from a fellow Linux user.
… I think you misread me. What I describe is a team that has at least four or five players who simply don’t do what they are told. It could be youthful rebellion, it could be any number of things.
My point was that it began with Liggins. That’s where players got the idea they could disobey the coach and not pay a price. That’s what has caused the quick hooks and the brain-dead play.
Does the coach fail to inspire? Perhaps. And that would be a problem.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Exactly
He can’t go from a multiple coach of the year to incompetent. The lack of effort and execution has been obvious. It is clearly his fault, but I do think he gets next year (and it appears a very short leash) to fix it.
Incompetent
I don’t think BG is incompetent really. Like you said,he has been coach of the year everywhere he has been. But,I don’t think he was ready for the expectations of being a Kentucky coach. The other places he has coached have nowhere near the expectations that are at UK and he hasn’t handled it well. I also think he does have problems with ego and with the way he tries to motivate his players,which is similiar to pounding somebody over the head with a two by four. Personally,I think UK has a big problem here but they have to stick with him and let him get his players. It’s just wait and see.
by maysvilleblue on Mar 11, 2009 7:15 AM EDT up reply actions
COY Facts
He was Conference COY in 2005 and 2006 then co-Conference COY in 2008.
UK had a coach who was UNANIMOUS National COY in 2003 and won similar (Jim Phelan) award in 2005 yet many thought him to be incompetent just 2 years later.
Point being, COY honors mean very little really. John Brady won some at LSU a few years ago. He got fired just last year.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 11, 2009 7:23 AM EDT up reply actions
Oh
please………..it doens’t mean anything? That is ludicrous. Don’t downplay what BG did. It was voted on. Uggh Forty, Your words are just like a bitter old wife who got replaced by a new young wife………..bitter and petty.
I don't care who is coach as long as Kentucky is Kentucky!
COY Awards Are What They Are
LAST year’s results.
It doesn’t mean anything. Rupp, Hall, Sutton, Pitino, and the other UK coach all won numerous National and Conference COY awards.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 11, 2009 9:55 AM EDT up reply actions
it's the difference
between stats and results, apparently ; )
by blue kentucky girl on Mar 11, 2009 7:03 PM EDT up reply actions
More idle speculation / questions
Whom does BCG turn to to be his sounding board? I don’t mean this in a basketball sense; I mean it more on the personal level. As he is single, is admittedly single-minded / obsessed with hoops, and, according to the ESPN article, just reads or stares out the window during road trips, does he have anybody on whom he can unload his frustrations?
Most coaches have wives that serve this role. It helps to have someone you can bitch about your day to (as any of us who are married can attest) – you can complain in the privacy of your own home, get it out, and move on. It’s a great stress relief. Who serves this role for Billy? Does he talk to the walls in his house? Or is his head going to explode on the sidelines one day?
C! A! T! S! CATS! CATS! CATS!
Great Post
I believe the FACT that this has been going on is well-known, but nobody really thought of the severity of it all and the depth at which it has plagued this season. But keep in mind we still don’t EXACTLY know how Billy handled the two situations of Liggins and Stewart. What if he agreed with them to let them stay on the team through the season, save their faces, if they promised to transfer in good standing at season’s end? If that were the case, it suddenly changes from a matter of “Billy can’t handle his personnel” to “Billy understands the fragile nature of a college athlete and wants to help him succeed in some capacity.”
Is that the right way to handle it? That’s another debate. Is it the completely wrong way to handle it? Definitely not. Is that what really happened? Probably not, but the point is we don’t know what actually is happenning behind the scenes.
And NYCCats above has some pretty nice commentary as well. Keep up the good work TRU.
Help me stay alive! Visit my web site! Thank you all!
a solution is only 3 years away or maybe sooner
I have been an avid blue blood UK fan since Joe B Hall sent Leonard Hamilton to my home town Oakville , Ontario to recruit my cousin who at the time was on a 5 game tour with the Yugoslav national team as a 16 year old ,who happened to be the late great Drazen Petrovic of the NJ Nets. Well there is another young super talent from this area in Canada who has been a UK fan all his life , today he is only 14 and has just completed a freshman season at St. Ignatius of Loyola Catholic school that will go down in history avg 18 pts 8 assists 7rebs at 6’4" and playing the point. PETER RUSIC is his name and the only school he is interested in playing for is of course UK . I know you good folks in Lexington have no way of understanding how talented this wonderkid is , but I also make my living as an NBA agent so I have some talent assessment instincts and this CAT , no pun intended ,is going to be special . he shot it from the 3 at an astounding 64% with 157 makes in 35 games, he has ended his season with 47 straight free throws over the course of his last 5 games , a gifted passer and has had a dozen electrifying dunks over the course of this season. Rusic has an older brother who is 6’7" but was 2 inches shorter than Peter at the same age !
I feel it is imperative for whoever is at the helm of this storied program next season to get a verbal committment from RUSIC , he is the kind of once in a decade player that will make history wherever he lands and we all will have to wait until 2012 to possibly enjoy him at Rupp Arena !
Who Was The 7-Ft Russian From St Thos Aquinas A Few Years Ago?
Great reputation but nothing since then.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 11, 2009 10:48 AM EDT up reply actions
the Russian
The 7 " Russian was a " mirage " he showed some flashes of skill but thought he was an MBA player out of high school , was actually brought to Canada by Bret Bearup ( remember him UK fans ) through an unsavory character, anyway the dude could not play and does not deserve another mention !!!
I Was Testing You
You passed. What you said above is true.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 11, 2009 12:57 PM EDT up reply actions
Thanks Tru
This is what i have been thinking most of the season and you put it into words better than i ever could have.
Couldn't Disagree More
Bro, we share a love for the Cats, but couldn’t disagree more on getting rid of Gillispie. I was pumped to have Gillispie when we got him. I didn’t want Donovan as he has done less with more than any coach in the country. I didn’t know much about Gillispie other than he seemed to have won at UTEP and A & M. But it was after the UAB game, not the Gardner Webb game that he lost me. I don’t have quotes, but I watched his show after that game and he was so condescending and “threw his players under the bus” then. He’s all about, “It’s my fault my players suck”.
The analogy with Pitino and Gillispie that you called a double standard is forced and my guess is you know that. To criticize a player for something they did is fine. I want that. If Gillispie would have kicked Liggins off the team for refusing to play I would have affirmed it. That is Liggins problem, not Gillispie’s. But to blame a team effort on one player or to shift blame to the team for something he is equally accountable for is crap.
On this issue of the players not doing what he tells them. They bear blame for that. But he’s the coach and that’s part of his job. Coach K, Coach Williams, Coach Pitino all convince their players to do what their told. Why can’t Gillispie? So either he’s not coaching them to execute or they don’t do what he says. Either way that’s a coaching problem. So…let’s get a guy who will coach his players or will motivate them to follow his lead.
Love your blog Tru. Love that you love the Cats with me. But this guy sucks. We need to cut our losses and get a coach in here. Even a mediocre coach gets this team to the NCAA and probably wins the SEC East.
The analogy between Pitino and Gillispie ...
… is not forced at all. It is direct evidence of a double-standard in the media that is predicated on success. If you are successful, it’s OK to deride your players. If not, then it’s “Shut up and win.”
As far as taking the blame, Gillispie has done it 100% of the time and has not forced the team to share it. He has explained that they have failed to execute instructions. That is a fact. Even the most casual observer of basketball can see that. He has also explained that certain players have done certain things detrimental to the team. That is also a fact. He hasn’t shifted blame at all — that is simply a perception jaded by his failure to succeed so far.
I did not relieve Gillispie of the blame for his player’s failure to execute. That is spelled out explicitly in the second to last paragraph, which must have escaped your notice (it was a rather long piece).
I’m glad you like the blog, and we’ll just have to agree to disagree about Gillispie.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Not just double standard though (although I agree it exists)
It also has to do with delivery. Pitino is masterfully smooth. Gillispie is rough around the edges.
Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."
Billy G
you know – negativity has spread rampantly for years. I agree with so many people that blast Tubby for leaving his coaches when he went to Minnesota and he would not do so while @UK…
Billy, though needs to change his own fortune. The first is to quit playing games with the UK Fanbase… he’ll lose us as fast as he won us when he was hired. First things first – sign your darn contract! We don’t have a lot of “understanding” for your memo. If your attorney won’t let you sign it, then find one that will negotiate the contract properly into a form that is acceptable to all parties.
That COMMITMENT should go a long way with the fans and players
then… there’s nothing wrong with cleaning house. I like AJ Stewart’s spirit and think he had potential but he may be the most immature player on the team. Ramon Harris… I really don’t get him at all.. I don’t care if he “plays defense” … he has more problems in offense than he defense can help him with. If he is scared to play hard on offense, send him to a sports shrink or send him to Division II.
There really is nothing keeping Barnhart from cutting Billy G loose… and really nothing to keep UK from cutting Barnhart loose – but the question would become who CAN replace them?
Billy G doesn’t carry the mantle of UK Basketball very well yet. There is no reverence for him in the fandom…or the country! UK Coaches are supposed to be royal….and even in his last days, Tubby was well above the mere mortal coaches like Pelphrey, Ford, Kennedy etc… Billy G needs to learn the part – go rent King Ralph and The Princess Diaries.
UK doesn’t need a drill sergeant – it needs a ruler. Tubby was too soft on the players… Pitino sent people and their fragile egos packing. Just look at Rod Rhodes!
I think the best of all the choices for UK Coach when Billy was hired happened to be Rick Barnes @ Texas.
Now I don’t think he’s going to get released this year… I just think he needs to work within the system and within the talent he has. Look at Tom Crean – cleaned house @IU – most coaches do!
Now Carter’s leaving – he’ll still have his framed jersey and a job for life in UK.
Let’s get Orton healthy and a few other players fit over the summer. Miller and Liggins need to be slashers and shooters… and a POINT GUARD needs to emerge.
Oh…and one last thing BILLY G… if you want Jodie to have touches on every possession…and the defense collapses when he touches it… why isn’t he BRINGING THE BALL DOWN THE FLOOR every time possible??
when the ball is in his hands, it is that much easier to roll of a screen or set up the pick and roll. Dick V has 1 eye and says the most dangerous shooter off a screen is the ball handler who just gave it up… they need to set up some lob plays for Stephenson,Miller and Liggins…maybe even Stewart
they need to remember to have players IN THE PAINT when the long ball goes into the air… the more Blue, the more RBs!
This is awesome
Good comments. But Rick Barnes didn’t want to come to Kentucky. I still think Mark Few would have been the best choice but maybe there’s still something in the tank with Billy G.
That's Not Accurate About Barnes
He wanted 1 day to ponder his decision. He wasn’t given 1 day, it was Now Or Never.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 11, 2009 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions
I've never heard that
But I can understand it. Barnhart couldn’t afford the chance that his first two public choices both turned him down.
Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."
Assistants In Minnesota
- wanted top assisant (associate HC) with coaching experience = Ron Jirsa.
- wanted recruiting assistant with Minnesota name recognition = Vince Taylor.
- wanted his son on his staff = Saul Smith.
Makes PERFECT sense to me.
NOTE that Shawn Finney (ex-UK assistant and DBO in 2007) declined an opportunity to go to Minnesota when offered,
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 11, 2009 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions
Your arguments don't really add up on this one
On the one hand, you say you want UK to have a coach with legit experience, something Tubby really never had but you’re obviously a big supporter of his. Now you’re saying it’s OK for Tubby not to bring his coaching staff to Minnesota. UK wanted some better assistants too, were we so wrong?
As for the Barnes thing, maybe you can help me out with the definition of saying no. I remember clearly when the report came on the news and Barnes said he wasn’t interested, to me that means he didn’t want to come to Kentucky. One, two, heck sixteen days, what’s the difference? No is no.
I'm Just Stating Why The 3 Minnesota Assistants Were Hired
All make sense. Jirsa has HC experience. Taylor has Minnesota exposure. Saul is his son. And Finney turned down DBO job offer there. It’s not an argument. Just facts.
Barnes may have accepted a UK job offer if UK hadn’t pressured him for an answer THAT day. Believe it or don’t, I don’t care.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 11, 2009 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions
But still
He said no, so he didn’t want to come. Therefore the statement is accurate. What could of happened is merely speculation.
The assistant hires make sense, but so does the other argument that it’s the same thing UK wanted.
Not Necessarily
Had UK waited 1 day, his answer MAY have been Yes. No way to know (for sure).
Why would UK want an assistant with Minnesota ties? Reggie Hnason had Kentucky ties.
UK would never have allowed the hiring of Saul, who recruited Canadian POY Devoe Joseph to Minnesota. (Primary scout, that is)
David Hobbs also had HC experience but is a lifelong Southerner who wouldn’t move North either.
by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 11, 2009 3:18 PM EDT up reply actions
Well said Tru...
I would just like to add that IMHO Gillispie is in between a rock and a hard place here. The media has already posterized him as public enemy number one of the college basketball world, dating back to his “questionable” antics with recruiting over the last two years.
Add to that the obvious trouble of this years team, and the unhappy fan base, that is a recipe for disaster. What is the high road in this situation? What is the answer. I get the feeling the whole that has been dug here, and not just buy Gillispie might I add, may be to deep for him to climb out of. I don’t see the Mitch Barnhart running him outta town this season, BUT, I think if things don’t go REALLY well next year, it will ultimately be the demise of Coach G.
With that being said, I think you WILL see a MAJOR overhaul the roster after this season ends. I look for Stewart and Liggins to be sent packing,and rightfully so. I think with the incoming class, ( plus a REAL point guard), we could potentially have a top 25 team. But will that be enough to satisfy this rabid fanbase?
Gillispie needs to do some soul searching this off-season. Answer some questions about his team and himself. And if this is where he truly wants to be, go out there and make it happen. At this point, I would be happy with 20-25 ranking and less than 10 losses. GO CATS!!!
Thanks very much.
I think we will see some changes. Stewart and/or Liggins seem the most likely.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
a top 25 team next year
would get everyone off gillispie’s back a bit.
He needs to cut his losses in half (or better) next year.
The fans of the winningest program in history will not like another mediocre showing next year.
With 12 losses already...
It should certainly be doable.
Then again, it was doable this year too!!!
Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."

by 















