Mississippi State 66, Kentucky 57: Postmortem
You have no idea how much I hate writing postmortems on losses, and this is the third in a row. Two at home. Sometimes this gig can be really disheartening.
Congratulations to the Mississippi State Bulldogs. What a display of three point shooting and shot blocking. Obviously, they can't expect to continue doing this forever, but it was way more than enough to easily handle a Kentucky team who simply cannot shoot a three pointer unless Meeks takes it. Well done to Mississippi State and Rick Stansbury.
I am frustrated right now, but after the ridiculous display of three point shooting in the second half, I am confident we could not have won this game under any circumstances. Consider the pitiful sight of seeing Perry Stevenson trying to guard a 48% 3-point shooter on the perimeter. It almost caused me to break down and cry. And Johnson just toyed with him, then launched a 26 foot shot that never touched the rim.
It's a shocking thing to run up against a team that goes nuts like that from three. It leaves me with little to say, because quite frankly, most of it is irrelevant. You cannot guard a team like MSU that far from the basket, especially when your best players are 6'9" tall. It is what it is.
It's tempting to rail on the coach, but quite frankly, I can't think of anything he could have done that he didn't do. When you plunk in the deadly-but-athletically challenged Landon Slone hoping for some 3-point looks, you aren't surprised when the superior athletes leave him in the dust for layups.
For the record, here are my observations:
- The offense looks completely clueless. If we can't get it to Patterson and Meeks, nobody seems to know what to do. Frankly, I am now convinced Liggins has been getting it right all along -- he knows that you have to do something, even if it's wrong. Liggins had a spectacular game that will be remembered by nobody.
- The defense was strong in the early part of the first half, then went straight to pitiful. In the first half of the second half, the defense was outstanding, but in the last part of the second half, it was irrelevant. MSU started hitting threes so far away, you would have needed an airline ticket to get there.
- Patrick Patterson and Perry Stevenson were absolutely dominated by Varnado. Period. He sucked up their shots like a black hole consumes loose material. It was otherworldly.
- Thank God we finally screened for Meeks in the second half. It didn't matter, though, we couldn't do it enough.
- You would think when Patterson was triple-teamed, there would be open men. Somehow, the 'Cats managed not to have any. I think this is a new and novel way to play offense. Not sure I like it, though.
- Fans booing is bad. I'm disappointed in them. Look, we all hate this loss, but losses are part of basketball, even at Kentucky. If you just can't cheer for the team, or critique them, just shut the hell up.
- Poor Ramon Harrris.
- This loss hurts us, and is quite possibly unrecoverable.
- Some good news -- We don't have to play this team again, unless it's in the SEC tournament.
- Some bad news -- The schedule gets harder from here.
- Some horrible news -- Defending only Meeks and Patterson is a great way to play the Wildcats. Just forget the rest of the team, as they can't seem to score even if you leave them unopposed.
- I have no idea how Gillispie fixes this. If he can, he is a genius.
I would love to go on a tirade, but quite frankly, there is not that much to be critical of. We got outplayed by an utterly unconsious team. They were making every shot they looked at, and you can't guard that. I saw a ton of good challenges, but every time we were late, they simply shot the ball in. And if time ran down, they moved out to 26 or 27 feet and shot it from there like I would shoot a layup. Then Varnado would reject Patterson, or Stevenson, or whoever every time they got an open look. Nothing to see here, really. Move along.
Give MSU credit, ladies and gentlemen of the Big Blue Nation. We didn't lose this game. MSU beat the tarnation out of us, and what we did was irrelevant. It was every bit as dominating a victory, in the end, as North Carolina's was. Moaning and groaning is irrelevant. Shooting is irrelevant -- we are incapable of shooting well enough to beat them with Varnado in the middle.
Tonight, these guys were the Borg, and we have been assimilated.
192 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
You pretty much summed it up....
I don’t know what else could have done defensively when a team is making alot of truly long 3 pointers. That was unreal and deflating.
Offensively, I am so fed up. UK is a two man team on offense and that isnt going to cut it in big-time basketball. It has caught up to UK in a very real way. That realization is setting in and coach will have to figure that out.
Slower Traffic Keep Right!
The thing is -
we SHOULDN’T be a two man team. Stevenson should be able to score 10 points or more every night. Miller should be able to score the same. At this point, Liggins should be good for 6-8 most nights.
Miller and Stevenson (and Porter, but I’m not getting into that) won’t shoot the damn ball when they’re open. I’m not talking about passing up open threes – they pass up open 6 or 7 footers and open 10-12 footers constantly. The bottom line is that other teams take those shots. We don’t. Half the time when we pass up that shot, we turn the ball over before we can take any shot.
Liggins is the only one willing to at least try, but obviously coach has him so terrified of losing PT he can’t keep doing it until he gets it right.
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
--O.W.
I don't know
Some of their 3s were crazy, but when you only score 57 points, you’re not going to beat hardly any team. Also, its not like the 3s were coming from unknown commodities.
by TheFakeGimelMartinez on Feb 3, 2009 9:51 PM EST reply actions
Yeah, but really ...
… look at their 3-point percentage. Yes, we aren’t the best 3-point defending team in the land, but we aren’t completely unfortunate in that area.
It’s amazing, when you think about it, that we held them to 66 points. We could not score where we score well because of Varnado. Guess Gillispie’s idea of “taking it to him” just really wasn’t a plan, was it?
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
"Taking it to him"
When I heard Gillispie say on the pre-game show that our gameplan was to take it right to the rim against Varnardo, I knew we were in for a long night.
Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."
Thanks For the Laugh
I needed it. Do not dispare, this loss too will pass. Maybe now, the support players will realize how badly we need them to Step UP. Maybe now the fans will realize how badly their team needs them to step up and to cheer them on and GIVE them confidence not diminish it.
Maybe it was hard to write but you will look back on this post some day and see how well written it was and faintly remember when this loss seemed to matter so much!
"Frankly, I am now convinced Liggins has been getting it right all along -- he knows that you have to do something, even if it's wrong."
I had made a comment about this after Liggins’ game where he went like 3 for 17 (unsure of the numbers, all I know is he shot lots and missed lots). I said that I was torn between liking this and hating this, based on the rest of the team being scared to try and score the basketball. Well folks, I have reached my breaking point. Fire it up Liggins! At least he is aggressively trying to make an impact on offense. Thats more than anyone not named Meeks or Patterson can say. I have NEVER seen a team more timid and scared to attack in my life. That gets under my skin more than anything.
I'm gonna agree with that.
I don’t care if Liggins goes 1-50. At least somebody will be putting up shots instead of turning it over.
Who knows, maybe we’ll get an offensive rebound.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
I'll third that
At least he’s not afraid to fail – watching everyone else pass up open jump shots is infuriating. You are a basketball player, shoot the ball. A shot attempted at least has a chance of going in, a passed up shot has no chance.
Knock it out, Liggins, I don’t care if you throw up 50 shots, either.
http://anythingbutgatorade.blogspot.com - yet another SEC sports blog
by Anything but Gatorade on Feb 4, 2009 8:55 AM EST up reply actions
Agreed, and if our other plays show they can score, at least every now and then, it will free up Patterson and Meeks.
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
--O.W.
Fallout from 54.
Meeks going for 54 has hurt us. It has caused everyone else to believe that he’s the best and sometimes only option. I don’t know how many times we had open shots tonight that were passed up and then we would force it to Meeks or Patterson and miss or get blocked. At the college level, if you are open and in “your range” you better shoot. When we get triple teamed in the paint, you kick it out and get the open shot or drive for lay up. Instead, we stand there and try to throw it back in or Patterson tries to man up and beat 4 people. If I am BCG, I don’t let Patterson or Meeks shoot one time in practice this week. Scrimmage and don’t let them shoot. The team that doesn’t break 80 in the scrimmage runs their hind parts off.
Xbox Live Gamertag: hoopchi
I think maybe ...
… it’s time to get the f$@$#^ over it, then!
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Just run'm....
Then shooting drills, box out drills, shooting drills,run’m, shooting drills shooting drills, shooting drills, shooting drills, shooting drills, run’m, box out drills, run’m shooting drills and so on and so on
Haha. I really like that practice idea.
Meeks and Patterson don’t really need any shooting practice, so that’s great.
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
--O.W.
This was easily one of our worst losses in my mind
and yet… we were + 1 in turnovers. That makes this team just impossible to figure out to me. We have all been talking about how the turnovers are what is killing us, but we were plus 1 in this game, and in the Ole miss game, what did we have? 10 turnovers?? So we can harp on the turnovers all we want, but it seems like if its not one thing its another. I just can;t figure it out.
Nothing to figure out.
We ran into a buzz saw. You can’t beat a buzz saw, you are cut to pieces by one.
There it is. Simple, really. :-)
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
see my post below but
ole miss and usc hit a number of 3’s as well – guess they just get up for the game against big blue
by memphis wildcat on Feb 3, 2009 10:09 PM EST up reply actions
Grim analogy.
It seems like we have been tending to run into alot of buzzsaws lately. And i do agree with you that when 60% of a teams made field goals are 3 point attempts that are coming from wayyy beyond the line , theres just not much you can do.
I got one.
To brighter days. -virtual clink-
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Liggins did play great tonight...
I understand that encouraging him to shoot is possibly another answer to just praying PP and Jodie Meeks get their combined 44 a game. But what impressed me is he didn’t look out of control tonight. He didn’t heave up prayers and his defense was outstanding for the most part. I think we all hopefully caught a glimpse of the future. I do agree about everyone forcing the ball to those two as well. They don’t realize that the more they shoot, the more it opens up Meeks and Patterson to do their thing.
I need a Sea of Blue because I am surrounded by Tennessee orange!
Liggins...
…did look good tonight, and showed more control than any other game this season. When he plays his game and within himself, he is a hell of a basketball player. I am excited to see him mature.
There was a game plan
The game plan was to get some 6-footers and layups for Darius Miller when everyone was on Meeks and Patterson. It worked great when we ran it. Coach was definitely trying different things, but the players just need to get more confident in their roles to do so. We’re not a great 3-point shooting team, we shouldn’t be shooting a lot of those, especially when we’re not rebounding, and we didn’t. Coach had the right game plan and made the right calls, but we just weren’t consistent enough, turned the ball over too often, and got blocked by Varnado too often.
I’m not mad at coach either. I saw the gameplan, and we executed it OK on offense, but with too many turnovers. Defensively, we failed to pressure the ball and guard the three.
a voice of reason in the wilderness of panic
i agree:
i said elsewhere that the 3 point shot that liggins took that got him yanked in usc game was not bad – sometimes you just have to do SOMETHING, even if its bad.
miller had a great game that will be forgotten
harrelson played well in first half – where was he in second half
how come everyone seems to make a BUNCH of threes against us. is it that we are that bad at shooting treys that everyone looks good – or is it just that everyone gets jacked up playing the big blue
only criticism i have of BCG is that after ole miss shut down dynamic duo, you make changes. after usc shuts down, you definitely make adjustments. after msu – he has a week so i hope he puts in plays and does not run them to death.
Vanardo did the SAME thing to us in starkville last year – you would think we would have learned.
what hurts most about the loss is the unknown about the rest of the season – especially with the schedule getting harder…..
by memphis wildcat on Feb 3, 2009 10:07 PM EST reply actions
completely agree about the unknown
It’s torture. I also hate having to come the realization that this team may just be a little to average. They are young… for the most part and hopefully they are learning. I am super pissed at the UK fan base for booing. Here comes more fuel to that fire of us all being the most irrational fan base in America. I went to UK for four years, attended several games and never in my recollection heard booing like that.
I need a Sea of Blue because I am surrounded by Tennessee orange!
by sleepytimetea on Feb 3, 2009 10:12 PM EST up reply actions
You do something
and that something is not gun a 3 point shot, when you’re in transition, and no one is in position to rebound. That something IS run the offense. Liggins did a great job of it today, he’s definitely learning.
Miller says it in today's post-game
"It is the same in practice and in the game. There are times we I might be open but that is not what we need at that moment. What we need is to get into the flow of the offense and get a better shot. The best shot we can get is lay-ups and we need to make sure we get Patrick (Patterson) and Jodie (Meeks) their touches. It is not up to us to come down and shoot every time we are open. We can get that shot anytime we want so we try to work through our offense and get Patrick and Jodie some touches. Those two are our main players and we don’t need to be throwing up shots every time we are open."
Hmm.
I think that is a freshman attitude. Jodie and Pat got plenty of touches tonight. They were locked up like Charles Manson.
Sometimes, you gotta be the guy.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
You don't know that
…unless you run the offense some first, though. 8’) If they have two men on Jodie and two on Patrick, there is a layup or 6-footer to be made somewhere.
If we run the offense some and don’t get anywhere, I’m okay with one of our guys taking the 3, of course! Also in the late game situation when we’re down 13, go ahead and gun it.
I'm out too.
Drank it all after SC. Didn’t think I would need it again so soon.
Xbox Live Gamertag: hoopchi
Really.
The very thought makes me tremble. :-)
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
on my seventh beer
I can’t do bourbon on nights like this. Brings out the “irrational fan”.
I need a Sea of Blue because I am surrounded by Tennessee orange!
by sleepytimetea on Feb 3, 2009 10:12 PM EST up reply actions
love your slogan
i am surrounded by a sea of orange (puke orange to be exact) and memphis blue and grey -
by memphis wildcat on Feb 3, 2009 10:17 PM EST up reply actions
ha ha
it’s a fine mixture of that intolerable Orange and Vandy Gold and Black… although that seems to have disappeared some this year… Vandy fans are very fickle.
I need a Sea of Blue because I am surrounded by Tennessee orange!
by sleepytimetea on Feb 3, 2009 10:19 PM EST up reply actions
i meant to say that I live in Nashville...
I need a Sea of Blue because I am surrounded by Tennessee orange!
by sleepytimetea on Feb 3, 2009 10:21 PM EST up reply actions
This is a bad loss
But, I think all knew at the start of the year that we would not be competitive on a national level. Truth be known, a lot of us would have taken 5-3 with this outfit. I saw hope tonight in th eplay of Liggins and Miller. I also agree with those who wondered where Harrellson went to after the first half.
Realistically, we are still one recruting class away for having the talent and depth that we need to really compete. We got Miller and Liggins this year, with Hood and Orton to follow.
Should Patterson and Meeks stay (I think they do), then we should be deeper and better on the perimeter both offensively and defensively.
I do think we right the ship enough this year to get to the NCAA, and maybe even win a game against an out of conference team.
the upside to losing is that maybe it
takes away some of the lustre on meeks and patterson going pro – hate it for them but as a fan i sure would like to see what one more year would bring.
however, if they stay, will we have enough scholarships? that is rhetorical – tonight is not the time to discuss that issue…….
by memphis wildcat on Feb 3, 2009 10:19 PM EST up reply actions
I would think the current situation...
…would encourage a player to leave for the pros.
'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'
Well
I think he’s saying that with the team underperforming, some of the appeal will drop from those two as well and may drop their draft status some, You don’t look nearly as good when your team isn’t winning a bunch of games. I see that really dropping Meeks alot out of thenational picture, though not so much with patterson.
Plus, their scoring is becoming so all over the board, it may pull down the averages. Patterson only had 10 tonight. Jodie
has been struggling to break 20. If anything, NBA guy are being shown that it’s not that hard to shut these two players down. Not good for them. Good players on good teams gets open. They don’t allow themselves to be shut down.
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
--O.W.
i agree,
but my thinking was how could either/both be lottery picks with our performance in a “down” sec – one might even drop to second round. not saying they should, but could.
of course, i was sort of hoping meeks would go dwayne wade on some people in the tourney – that was when we were a lock to make it (3 games ago…)
by memphis wildcat on Feb 3, 2009 10:24 PM EST up reply actions
with their great stats accumulated in games like this?
their stock has dropped. Jodie Meeks is out of contention for player of the year by now surely. He was already projected late 2nd round, if at all. Blake Griffin and Hansborough will keep PP here another year. He’s an eventual lottery pick, not the fourth or fifth big guy taken in the draft, in my opinion. I think they both stay unless some miraculous turn around is just around the corner…. and that would make me happy too!
I need a Sea of Blue because I am surrounded by Tennessee orange!
by sleepytimetea on Feb 3, 2009 10:25 PM EST up reply actions
The scouts and NBA teams have little interest how a team is performing.
The player on the other hand, would have to ask himself this with everything equal… “Will I improve my skills & play in this type of environment and with this type of coaching.”
'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'
Most Mocks I have seen have P Pat....
as a late lottery pick or later. And most of those really are not including foreign players. If that holds true, he will have a tough decision to make.
Slower Traffic Keep Right!
True....
…but where would he stack up with the next ‘rotation’ of players that would be eligable….and I don’t know the answer. There is always players coming up and always foreign players coming in. Also, don’t forget the injury component…is it worth risking injury? And then you have what I mentioned above….
'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'
Vanardo
People saying we should have learned from last year (regarding Vanardo), I’m not sure that is possible. He is going to block shots. Period. He is similar to Thabeet. They will block/alter shots every game, and its not like you can just abandon your inside game completely. It will happen against those types of game-changers.
I'll trade you Thabeet for Vanardo.
…we may have just a little better chance of beating UConn.
'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'
I give you credit, Tru.....
It must be hard to write the ‘Postmortem’ after each game, especially when the Cats lose. Good job.
What bothers me the most is the lack of improvement. It seems like the Cats have regressed in a lot of areas.
We looked clueless on offense for about 95% of the game. Too many times I saw guys standing around and they looked completely confused. You would think having Meeks and Patterson would make things easier for Porter, Miller, Harris and Stevenson, but it seems like the exact opposite.
Our defense, which was our strength at one point, has really fallen apart. We are not communicating, we are unable to stop dribble penetration, we are not playing smart and we are not playing with the intensity that we should. We really need someone that is a lock down defender, but this team doesn’t have that type of player.
The schedule ahead looks pretty daunting. We have 4 really tough road games, 3 really tough home games and 1 cupcake at home against Georgia. If we don’t pick it up soon and start playing better, we could lose 4 or 5 of our remaining 8 games.
GBB!!!
Offensive stats don't matter
Individual offensive performance doesn’t matter in any particular game. What matters is whether the team has an offensive system that allows all five players a decent chance to score if they are open.
Our offensive “system” consists of forcing the ball into the middle to Patterson. Tonight we forced it into him with a low bounce pass at the knees. They had a little guy right there to strip it from him. We took a 6-8 guy and made him 5-7 — with the wrong kind of pass.
When we are not forcing the ball in deep, we are setting picks for a three from Meeks. Sometimes he hits them, tonight he didn’t.
The last two games Miller has decided to dribble the ball to the basket and shoot 3 or 4 times in a row at a particular point in the game. He has been fairly successful, but it is apparent that this is a set play, not something that grows out of a system.
SEC coaches have watched enough video at this point to know that we don’t have a game. We just have plays to free up Patterson and Meeks. It’s not hard to defense that. It also helps when we have nobody except Meeks who can hit a three more than 10 percent of the time even if they are left open for 10 or more seconds.
Our players are trying to do what Coach tells them to do. But it doesn’t work. Because opposing coaches have identified our weaknesses. And our players are getting discouraged because they are doing what they are told, and the team is still getting beat.
I wonder...
how many points Patterson scores off of rebounds and second chance shots as opposed to actual assists. I bet the number would be very frightening if such a stat were kept. It seems most of his points come from the garbage left around the rim. He may be the best clean up player in the SEC.
I need a Sea of Blue because I am surrounded by Tennessee orange!
by sleepytimetea on Feb 3, 2009 10:29 PM EST up reply actions
Agreed
I’ve noticed that this season too. Many of his points are a result of his hustle on the boards/clean up, opposed to his team actually getting him the ball in scoring position
EXACAMUNDO!!!!!!!!!!
“they are doing what Coach tells them to do.” And that my fellow bloggers is the problem. BCG’s system is not based on talent. It seems to be based on BCG. His answer to every problem is to get tougher. How about smarter. Why take the ball into Varnado constantly when you could pull up for an 8-10 footer? Why won’t he mix in a little 2-3 or match-up zone to overcome our guards constantly getting beat on dribble drives. It has happened over & over this year.
I feel sorry for Harris this year but in all honesty, why is he playing. He has become the Mark Coury of this year’s team. The problem with last night was that we got behind early & gave Miss St confidence that they could win at Rupp. I don’t have much confidence going into the rest of our schedule. Meeks/Patterson or nothing. I could draw up a defense for that!
You Hit the Nail on the Head
We are a very easy team to defend right now because we have only one—I repeat—only one legit outside shooter. This is not rocket science. The teams that have beaten us this year have, for the most part, beaten us with superior outside shooting (and by locking down our only outside scoring threat). Our offense looks bogged down—especially when Meeks is locked down—because no one else on the team can consistently make an outside shot. How did this happen folks? How did we find ourselves with a roster full of “guards” like Porter, Liggens, Galloway, and Slone who can’t consistently hit an open jump shot? I bet if True or Ken put together a shot chart from last night’s game, we would see that all but about 5 or 6 or our baskets came from in or around the paint, whereas most of MSU’s baskets came from outside shots.
A few days ago, I posted that our team’s primary problem was the lack of a true point guard. I now wish to amend that post to proclaim that the problem is much deeper, and much more fundamental, than that. This team’s problem is that it, but for Meeks, it lacks guys who can keep defenses honest (and away from Patterson) by consistently hitting wide-freaking-open outside shots.
Galloway and Liggins
I think CBG should have signed 1 and not both players. Since we got a commitment from Liggins first, I would have used the other scholarship to get either a really good shooter or a lock down defender. We need both.
GBB!!!
ONLY HAVE ONE COMMENT
Sooner or later you have to come out of man to man defense. We’re gettin beat on high post screens and when the big man tries to double it always ends bad. This play and jacking up 3’s is all Miss St. did to beat us.
It will take a miracle
for this team to make the tournament IMO if they keep playing like this..something drastic has to change and honestly, i don’t see it happening. I thought I would see it tonight, but the team has regressed to a point that it is not reversable. Sad really.
That's what she said.
Good night all...
May you dream of W’s and 20,000 strong celebrations at the corner of Euclid and Woodland!
I need a Sea of Blue because I am surrounded by Tennessee orange!
same to you
i need to go as well, my wife thinks i am nuts………
by memphis wildcat on Feb 3, 2009 10:32 PM EST up reply actions
Simply put - we were beat by a better team.
The BBN is overly anxious to have mediocre teams a thing of the past so anytime there is a sliver of light shining on something better than mediocre – 5-0 conference record and ranked (albeit 24th) – we’re quick to anoint the team, coach, fanbase and anything blue the second coming. We must be patient and rational; however difficult and contrary to bluemania it may be – it takes time. Patience is not one of our greatest attributes and accepting loses is anathema to our basketball heritage but there are better teams out there — for now.
I don’t know how we can realistically believe that two very, very good players, one good/bad player (pick your night) and two bodies filling in for a guard and g/f are going to take us to the promised land when led by a man with, as yet, unfulfilled potential. We may have the best average 2-3 man talent on the floor but too many times we come up just even or a little short when averaging all 5 players on the floor; and don’t think the 2-3 man winning average will carry a team day-in and day-out through the course of the season and for entire games.
The seeds for rebirth are there but we still need a little time for the plants to mature and to round out the garden. Don’t despair, be patient, support the team in blue. C – A – T – S CATS! CATS! CATS!
Beat by a better team??
MSU was ranked 102 in RPI. This would officially be called a bad loss by the Tournament Committee, the way I understand it.
'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'
They were better tonight.
And that’s a fact.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Eh.
RPI really doesn’t go very far in showing you how good a team is; computers can’t really dictate if one team is better than another, so when one team clearly shows they are better than another, it’s a bit of a reach for straws to say “they aren’t better than such and such team, they have a worse RPI ranking”.
Wow....that's a heck of position to take with this team.
I say step back and take a breath….certainly, MSU had a better game than UK, but a better team? Other than the score of one solitary game, there is no other perspective that would fairly allow one to say that MSU has a better team. If this conclusion is true, then there is a bigger concern with the coach than I can see.
'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'
I'm not saying the Cats are a bad team..
rather, other teams are better at this point in the season due to the mix of the non-Meeks/Patterson players. The team has a collective drop off in performance – not talent or potential – when you look at the 3 -5th players on the floor. Due to talent that shouldn’t hold true for the remainder of the season IF BCG can get the players to instinctively play the offense and defense. With the progress that both Liggins and Miller are showing, the offensive improvement is coming. I expect the offense to gel as teams start to get burned by concentrating on Meeks/Patterson. I’d really like to see plays designed to develope the 3-5 by loading M/P to one side and run offense to the other side with PS or JH and two guards. The defensive end shortcomings are well described in Tru’s post and others in this blog and should be straightforward to address.
I’m not discouraged at all at where the team stands at this point and don’t think getting into the dance will be a problem. I just take exception to the handwringers calling for major changes when we are still watching a work in progress. We’d all like every first year player to immediately become an NBA prospect but that’s just not realistic. You can’t rebuild a dynasty overnight – or even in 1.5 years. You can progress a team from doormat to respectable in a short time (ie. UTEP, Texas A&M) but that next step takes a little longer.
Your Right
TRUE It will take time I just feel that sometimes in games you have do something unexpected to keep the other team honest. (Like go ZONE for 5 min. then switch back to Man to Man)
I know it's easy to get frustrated with this series of losses
But I disagree that this game is somehow fatal to UK’s NCAA tournament chances (making the field that is). Clearly the team was not as good as the 5-0 start might have suggested and clearly they are not as bad as the last three games might indicate.
There are some gleams in the darkness, notably Liggins and Miller getting better. It’s probably time for a lineup change to get them into the game at the beginning.
This team is better than the one that went 12-4 in the SEC last year. It’s time to find out if Gillispie is the coach we all want him to be. He needs to find a way to turn this thing around even if it means doing something he doesn’t want to do (like play zone every once in a while). I guess we’ll find out soon enough, but I still think 12-4 is realistic at this point.
...when you let other people tell you what success is, you already have no chance of ever finding it. - Doug Glanville
It's gonna take a rude awakening!!
Recall last season when Bradley and Joe suddenly “got it” after a few lost? It is gonna take the same for most of our players to realize they have to be confident, have to work hard, have to create opportunity in offense.
Our offense stinks firstly because we can’t create decent scoring opportunity for our two main offensive threat, our guards are simply not good enough in passing and ball handling.
Secondly the rest of the team doesn’t know when to step up and take chances
I don’t know whether it applies in basketball, but if it is in a fight, I will punch right on it when my enemy challenge me to punch his face. What I saw the team do instead is bouncing around trying to attack well defended scheme, and failed miserably. No wonder the team is deflated, and the opposing team lose respect to us.
The whole team needs to appreciate what it means to wear KENTUCKY uniform. Losing mentality is not acceptable when you wear KENTUCKY uniform. I hope they will wake up in time for the next game.
Mississippi State was 14-27 from 3-pt range
I didn’t realize they made 14….. I knew they were hot, but wow.
GBB!!!
Especially when you consider that MSU only had 23 field goals
Thats right, 60% of their made shots were 3’s
Thanks for this.
Actually makes me feel much better to hear the players recognizing the exact same things weve been harping on. They just don’t seem to show it on the court. e.x. Michael Porter – “If they sag off of me, or the others, we have to help out Jodie and Patrick. The most logical thing that we have to start doing is hit some shots. If we hit shots then they have to guard us more.” huh… where have i heard that..
Miller and Liggins were better, but Porter and Stevenson must shoot from the outside.
The team needs a team meeting and “stuff” needs to be discussed and settled. No one wants to be remembered as a member of the “Fumblin’ Five”.
According to The Cats Pause ...
… The team had an “eruption” in the locker room after the game which Patterson described as a “huge confrontation.” Apparently, Gillispie was just a spectator.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Really....
It will be interesting to find out about the confrontation. I hope this does more good than harm.
Slower Traffic Keep Right!
Dunno.
I think it was mostly just venting. Maybe it will help, maybe not. I wouldn’t worry too much about it.
Words are just words.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
I love this blog
I’m pretty sure this is the only blog you’d get references to Animal House and Seinfeld in the same night!!
Players attacking each other
in the locker room after the game? Why didn’t they attack MSU on the floor during the game?
I'm not sure I would use the word attacking.
I read the article at TCP and it didn’t sound bad at all. It was just mainly players letting out some frustration and talking about what they can do to improve as a team.
GBB!!!
Good grief
what a bunch of responses after a post mortem! I cannot bellieve how many there are. Good for Sea of Blue, but bad because its after a loss instead of a win. I think reality has set in for us now at least it has for me. This team is not what they pretended to be the five game prior to this three losses. I expected a loss here and there but not three in a row and not two at Rupp. I don’t remember a time that I have seen such a collapse and I fear that what is happening is the opposite of last year. Instead of pulling together and winning, they are falling apart and are at the point now where we start worrying about the NCAA tourney YET AGAIN!!!! I am so sick of it. I am sick of being jerked around as a fan. I am not blaming anyone BUT the players. BCG is a good coach now they have to take it. If anyone of you have played sports you know just as well as I do it takes players. As I type this………..Tru just put up a post about some kind of eruption in the lockeroom. This is what I stated a few days ago. Something is going down. Dont’ know what it is but its going down. I don’t cuss but I am so darn close it to right now.
I wouldn't take it too seriously.
We have seen similar before. Sometimes, you turn it around, and sometimes, you just kind of fold.
We’ll have to wait and see, but it’s way to early to give up.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Not giving up
yet, but just disheartened that is all. I dont’ drink so this is my only way of relieving the pain :)
Haha!
Well, maybe you should start. Works for me!
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Oops
I was getting the info from Yahoo
http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/basketball/boxscore?gid=200902030210
GBB!!!
Porter in the wnba?
I don’t think he could make it. Not the way he played tonight; 2 turnovers NO assists and five points. He demands no respect and is falling way short on the job of starting pg.
The road is looking awfully rocky from were I’m sitten BBN. Zanex anyone?
I’m not sure what it is; it may be my inebriated state, or perhaps many people I’ve heard in various places utterly blasting our team and our coach, or it could even be because I’ve seen things like this before and know what’s coming tomorrow in regard to public reaction, but I just..don’t feel too bad about this. We have to face facts, there was very, very little we could have done to won this. MSU was simply insane tonight, and my hat is off to them. We, on the other hand, are on a down streak right now, and that’s alright, it happens to every team. But we, the Kentucky family, have to bind together. It’s easy to love a team when everything is firing as it should, but when things get tough, it’s imperative that we stick together for our boys in blue and white. Yes, the past three games hurt, with this one being an especially deep dagger in our hearts, but they are tougher than this. WE are tougher than this.
I’m asking every reader at ASoB to send our boys our best wishes. Tell them that there are still those of us out there that are still behind them, no matter what. I know Jodie Meeks got many messages when he lit up Tennessee, how many do you think he gets after a game like this? Don’t worry, the media will be plenty tough on our boys and on Coach, we have to stand with them. Like any good marriage, it is for better or worse, for richer or poorer, in sickness (which Ramon Harris knows all too well) and in health. For those that may scoff at this analogy, think about it a moment. When a new coach comes along, do we not feel betrayed at times by the sudden change? As time goes by, we learn to accept them, and grow to love them. Our boys that come and go ARE our family. And I do NOT desert my family!
This loss…it broke us. That’s the only way I can think of it. Much like in Rocky III, MSU was our Clubber Lang. We have gotten soft, both us fans and the team. We fans thought the halcyon Jodie Meeks that we saw delivering bombs would last forever. The strong poppa bear Patrick Patterson would never falter. They became legends in our mind, instead of what they are, imperfect human beings who try their best. Coach BCG is not an omnipotent deity, he is just a guy in charge of a basketball program who is doing all he can to hold the team and himself together under what may be the most pressure anyone has ever seen put on a Kentucky team. And this MSU team, it finally broke us. But that’s not a completely bad thing.
We are left with just pieces. These are imperfect, rough pieces of a team. We now begin the process of smoothing these pieces, making them fit better together. We get back to basics. Become a better team, with better fundamentals. And then we glue this team back together, make them better than they were before this ever happened. Harder. Better. Faster. Stronger. We WILL come back. Much like Rocky Balboa, we will train, and work, and address our problems. And then we will return. What happens then, who can say? All I know is I will be standing beside my team; beside OUR team, no matter the storms lady destiny throws, I will stay strong in my conviction. We are Kentucky. No one can ever, EVER change that. And in the end, come win or loss, hell or high water, that simple fact will always shine clear and true. They can never take it away from us. After all, when we face our opponents, they do not see the names on our backs, only the one in front.
Now let’s get to work. We have plenty of it to do if we are to recover.
I am seriously putting on facepaint as I read...
and am ready to charge into battle, Braveheart style!
FREEEEEDOMMM!
I need a Sea of Blue because I am surrounded by Tennessee orange!
by sleepytimetea on Feb 4, 2009 12:51 AM EST up reply actions
G
All I know is that there better not be people putting this loss on our coach! Billy can not make our guys make shots! This loss is on the team. Since when can’t Kentucky friggin shoot!!!! I am so pissed at these guys!!! Shoot the damn ball cats!!!! No way this loss is on our coach- these boys should be ashamed of themselves!!!!
by kentuckygirl0724 on Feb 4, 2009 12:28 AM EST reply actions
I really ...
… Can’t find too much to criticize either way on this one. They just shot the ball out of their minds. It happens. Patterson couldn’t score because Varnado rejected his attempts.
If I found any fault with coach, it is that his game plan failed. But game plans often fail. I don’t blame the players, either, they played very hard for most of the game. Our shot selection was fine, MSU just had an answer for everything we did. It happens.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
The coaching staff and players
…. are both at fault.
I do think the coaching staff probably deserves a little more of the blame/criticism though.
GBB!!!
Maybe Billy has been right all along,
this team simply lacks quickness. He has said that his kids see one speed in practice and then they run into quicker players on game day who cannot be stopped.
Maybe.
We do lack quickness, but I don’t think that’s the problem with this one. This was just a team that had an answer for whatever we did, and frankly we tried everything that Gillispie is ever likely to try. He isn’t going zone (not that a zone would have been sane against a team making 28 foot jumpshots with consistency, but there you go), he isn’t going box and one, or triangle and two. He just isn’t.
When a team makes shots like this, the only way to beat them is to make them also. Normally, we can throw the ball in to Patterson or give it to Meeks, but MSU denied us that. Our other players are just not capable of putting up enough points to keep up with that. Therefore, we lost.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
I stayed up half the night to watch this....
And I was terribly disappointed. Frankly, I’m tired of blaming certain players or what have you. This was a team loss. The most frightening thing to me is that MSU basically spelled out how to play defense and beat Kentucky. I can’t imagine another team we face doing it any differently
Yeah.
Gillispie is going to have to figure out something with our offense. The only way I can see is to let Liggins pound the ball out front while every other player except Patterson sets staggered screens and Meeks bounces his man off them to get open. I thought we did an overall lousy job of screening for Jodie in the last three games, and particularly in the first half of last night. It’s like everyone forgot.
Not only that, just a ball screen here and there won’t work. We need to run him off at least three staggered screens every play. Nobody can guard that, and he’ll get open. It will hurt our rebounding, but I really don’t see any alternative at this point. If nobody else is going to shoot, fine, just let them screen.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
How about an alternative
First, he’s going to have to make some decisions. IMHO the decision is who, other than Patterson and Meeks, has the potential to score? As far as I’m concerned he’s only got two, Miller and Harrelson. Harrelson has excellent form and Miller has shown some flashes. Second, he’s got to let them know that he’s going to play them significant minutes and that he’s counting on them to score. Players need to know their roles. He’s jerked Harrelson’s chain so much the kid doesn’t have any confidence. Then, he needs to design some simple plays that are set up for them. I’m thinking a simple pick and roll with Harrelson doing the fade type roll that Laimbeer used to do with the Pistons. He doesn’t roll to the basket and get in the way, he rolls into an open spot for a jumper. That lets Miller attack the rim and he’d have Patterson weakside as well as Meeks hanging around for a three for outlets in case he gets in trouble. Get them each 10 or more shots. They’ll be going against the opponents 4th and 5th best defenders because their best ones will be focused on Meeks and Patterson. I would be willing to bet that if Miller and Harrelson posted double figures in scoring it would free Meeks and Patterson for better shots.
It’s like in football. A good offense takes what it’s given, they don’t continually try to force their will upon their opponents. Spurrier summed it up very well, “if they play us right we throw over them, if they play back we throw under them”. In basketball if they focus so hard on taking something away, in our case Meeks and Patterson, that leaves something else open. That something else is wide open threes and easy 15 footers. Miller showed that on the one drive where he got all the way in for a layup. Use Meeks and Patterson as decoys and take advantage of the opponents weakest defenders. It can be any worse than what’s going on now. Continuing to force the ball to Meeks and Patterson speaks of either incredible hard headedness or a lack of imagination.
Yeah.
I think what we need to consider is using more screens, or going to a pick and roll. We really don’t use that at all. I think a Liggins/Patterson pick and roll would be tough to stop.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Pick n roll
Is a foundation of basketball strategy. Executed well its extremely hard to defend. Every team in the NBa runs pick n roll. One of the most prized players to have is a big that can defend the pnr well. I cannot for the life of me undertand why we dont run screens. Billy G has his philosophy but I swear it really has gaps that include basic basketball prinicples in it.
DEEETROIT BASKETBALLL!!!
I know.
For God’s sake, all he has to do is look at tape of Billy Donovan’s teams if he wants to know how it’s done.
I guarantee you, when Florida gets to Rupp, we are gonna see the pick and roll. A lot.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Gillispie's understanding of the game
I was very disheartened while listening to his pre-game show the other night. Gillispie mentioned that in Coach Knight’s day he was successful with a motion offense and now teams have gone away from that and moved to other offenses. Then Leach asked what I thought was a great follow-up “Why is it that’s changed?” This could have given Gillispie a great chance to share his understanding of the evolution of basketball offense and how defenses have adjusted to different strategies and to demonstrate his own philosophy of basketball; instead he said “I really don’t know why that is.”
Arrrrrrrgh.
Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."
Motion offenses can still work
There are NBA teams running the Princeton offense successfully.
Motion
There are NBA teams running a modified version of a motion but not the whole shebang. I think motion principles are still effective. Not sure about only running motion.
DEEETROIT BASKETBALLL!!!
True
But my point was more that Gillispie could have taken that opportunity to express why Offense A has evolved into Offense B because of Defensive adjustment X. Or something like that.
Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."
Actually I think they run the whole package
I didn’t see anything about it being modified. Maybe I missed it.
wizards
The wiz are horrible have a interim coach. I’d be surprised if they ran the whole deal but they arent competitive in the league right now. They are missing a lot of personnel.
DEEETROIT BASKETBALLL!!!
Liggins/Patterson might work well
But I like Miller’s ability to pull up and shoot the little jumper better than Liggins even though Liggins is a little quicker. Plus, Miller plays a little more under control.
If you did Miller/Harrelson that isolates the opponents weakest defenders letting Patterson crash the boards from the weak side. Fade Harrelson to the foul line or above instead of rolling low. In the Liggins/Patterson scenario you’ve still got one of the guys the opponents are focusing on in the picture. If I was coaching against it I’d defend it the same way everybody is defending now, keep a guy close to Meeks and clog the middle. If you stick Meeks and Patterson weak side that frees up half the court. If they start slacking off to stop the pick and roll a quick ball reversal and Meeks and Patterson are quickly in a situation in which they can operate.
Disappointing L No Doubt
But Ole Miss defeated this Miss St team in Starkville over the weekend.
And Cincinnati beat them back in December 2008.
I think Mississippi State was beatable. They just played very well last night.
And UK didn’t play well.
Will History Repeat? (From 1973)
Back then http://www.bigbluehistory.net/bb/statistics/1972-73.html UK was 10-7 (5-4 in SEC) after losing to unranked Vandy at home on Feb 3rd (1973).
Against all odds of probability, UK ran the SEC table to finish 14-4 and win the SEC title, earning NCAA bid when that was the only way to do it.
Will history repeat? Stay tuned…
by FortyYearCatFan on Feb 4, 2009 3:54 PM EST up reply actions
Florida now leads the SEC East race.
And what’s weird is, we’re not even that good this season. What a strange year for Southeastern Conference play. Still anybody’s league to win, although it’s not exactly an elite-caliber trophy.
Orange and Blue Hue: The World through GATOR-colored Glasses -- http://www.orangeandbluehue.com
It is almost as if...
Nobody wants to run away with this thing. I wouldn’t be half surprised to see Florida dump its next game and the race continue to tighten.
Nope, me neither.
The sad fact is, none of us in this league are very good. Uconn, UNC, Duke… they’d all trash any team in the SEC.
Orange and Blue Hue: The World through GATOR-colored Glasses -- http://www.orangeandbluehue.com
Tru you seem reluctant to criticize… Criticism is not being negative!!!
I was at the game and here is what I saw and have to say!!!
- When UK came out for warm-ups there was no interaction between the players and they looked to be just going through the motions…
- They were pretty lifeless during introductions…
- You could tell at the start of the game that the team was not on the same page and were just going through the motions like they did in warm-ups…
- State played inspired and made some big shots… BCG does not know how to adjust defensively and his teams only know how to play one way…
- State played allot of four guard offense and spread the floor out (that is the scouting report on UK) causing allot of miss-matches where our 6’8 guys were guarding guys five to seven inches shorter creating quickness issues… This is what I saw during the game and this is exactly what Sky Walker said after the game…
- On defense State collapsed on Patterson and ran allot of box and one on Meeks… Hmmmm… We have seen that one before and I bet we see it allot over the next eight games…
- I told my wife in the first half that it appears to me that the coach has lost this team… Sky Walker and Larry Glover both offered the same analogy when the game was over… Walker went on to say that there is a significant divide amongst the players and coaches and that is going to be bad for this team…
- Why would Miller and Porter not shoot the three??? They know if they miss BCG is going to pull them (just like he did Galloway in the first half)…
- What is the rotation??? I do not even think BCG knows…
- What is our offensive set??? It looked to be not much of anything… There were not set plays for Meeks or Patterson and I have seen better offensive sets run during pickup games then what UK ran last night… My god this is Mississippi State and they are not that good but obviously better then UK…
- Sky Walker said it is obvious this team is not buying into Billy G and what Billy G is trying to do and the question is where does he (BCG) go from here? Does he change something or just stick what he is trying to do? If you keep beating the plow horse the horse will eventually just lay down…
- There is no leadership on the court and of course there are no seniors so that is part of the problem (Sorry Jared Carter as far as I am concerned you do not exist)…
- BCG can "love his guys" all he wants to but they are not loving him back!!!
- Can this team go 5 and 3 in its last eight games… If they do not and finish better then 9 and 7 in the conference they will be in danger of not making the tournament… I think so 4 and 4 is a must (no quality wins to this point)…
There is talent on this team… Go back to Ricky P’s second year at UK… Outside of Mashburn this team had band of nomads that no one wanted but they believed and bought in to what their wanted and was doing and they had the best record in the SEC… By year three he had these nomads in the final eight that is what can happen when a team buys into a coach…
Despite what people say or think BCG did not walk into a complete rebuilding job… There was talent here and he brought in talent… Does anyone think he can get this team to the final eight next year??? If he has lost this team then you can guarantee that Meeks and Patterson will not return next year…
I have also never seen this many people leave a game this early or boo as loud as they did at halftime… Even Sky Walker said after the game that he usually leaves at the five minute mark so he can make his radio show and he is the only one in outer corridors as he makes his way out… He said it was like he waited until the game was over to leave… I think BCG is losing the fan base much like Eddie Sutton did during his demise…
Wins will cure allot of these ills and losses will only bring more pressure… I want UK to win every game here on out or even 6 and 2 with a strong SEC tournament run would be acceptable but with the apparent mental state of this team it is going to be tough…
ShagOnSports - "people should know when they are conquered"
All this may be so ...
… but I have been critical enough. You know, there are times when criticism serves no productive purpose, really, it just exists for the purpose of making the critic feel better. Well, I am done feeling better at the expense of the team.
Yes, this team has issues. Yes, Gillispie is making mistakes and some of his decisions defy any logic I can produce. Yes, the team looks listless right now, for what reason we don’t know. But the fact is that I saw exactly the same game you did, I watched every minute, and although I didn’t have the benefit of being there live, I saw a team who put forth a very good effort. But effort doesn’t win ball games, it takes a plan and an execution of that plan. Nobody could have defended MSU any better than we did last night — they made contested shots and shots out of rational range. In reality, there is almost nobody in the nation you would not concede a 27 foot shot to. You can’t guard closely that far from the basket, or you’ll get burned on the dribble drive. A three from that range is a very low percentage shot, but when they go in, there is no defense.
But offensively, we were inept. This is an known issue with this team. We have to find a way to turn this weakness into a strength, or we will continue to lose games. That’s just all there is to it.
UK fans are very quick to offer criticism and complaint, but very slow to recognize that not every game can be won. There are times when the opponent simply doesn’t allow it. We should all learn to recognize those times, stand back and let the team fix what is broken. We all know what is wrong — it has been beaten to death here and elsewhere. Repeating this over and over again will not make it go away faster, or make the coach any more amenable to our views.
The only people who can fix this are the team. At some point, we have to have a little faith, or drive ourselves nuts asking questions of the darkness.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Agree that defense wasn't the problem
Even with making ridiculous 3s, MSU only scored 66 points. We should be able to deal with that.
C! A! T! S! CATS! CATS! CATS!
Can I just
say that they bought into Billy’s system before the loss to Ole Miss. They played inspired before that. So what happened?
Would Like Your Thoughts
I saw so much to criticize last night but that is not what I am going to post. I just wonder if missing Bill Keightly has anything to do with the downward spiral of the last couple of years? It was said that he had a soothing effect on the players, when they were down, as well as on the coach. Could Mr. Wildcat have been even more important to the success or failure of our teams than we even know?
Would like your input on this.
The time has come!
Let me start off by apologizing for what follows, after last night I need to vent and this is the least expensive way. For the last year and a half I have been at a verbal war with colleagues and coworkers about giving Billy a chance. There are alot of Tubby fans that did not want to do that. I am a Tubby fan as well, but first and foremost I am a Kentucky fan and Tubby is no longer our coach so lets move on! As I said before I truly believed (thats right, you can tell by the past tense where this is going) we have to give Billy a chance. After last night, the wedding is over and the divorce has begun. You can say what you want, yet every problem this team has comes down directly to poor coaching! Why is it every player on every team we play seems to have a career night against us? Why is it I can call 4 friends up and play a pick up game at shilito park and run the same offense UK has been running for the last year and a half? Why is it we have some of the most talented players in the country yet insist on playing them in positions they have never played? All these and many other answers to many, maybe even all, of UK’s problems comes down to poor coaching! If you want to feel sorry for someone feel sorry for the young men playing on this team without a game plan! I hear people blaming all kinds of things except what really matter, fundamentals. This is not meant to be a personal attack on Billy, just pointing out the facts. Too many times I have seen players being played in the wrong position e.g. Jasper 2g, Bradley 1g. Too many times I have seen our center and/or forward at the top of the key initiating the offense and starting what plays it looks like we might be trying to run. Too many times I have seen UNATTESTED THREE POINT SHOTS go in the hoop costing us valuable points. Yeah, I know the argument, " you have to let them shoot those low percentage shots! " And I say to that, NO YOU DON’T. Yes, they may be low percentage shots, and yeah maybe you let them try it once, maybe even twice. But if they are hitting them and have shown you they are going to take them you have to get in their face, especially when the game is close. Back to last night, I have never ever felt the way about UK basketball I felt in the first 6 minutes of the game last night. I mean, hello make some adjustments. Yeah I know we start slow alot of times but that can and did set the tone for the rest of the game. Last time I checked there are not negative points in basketball, pull all 5 guys out and put 5 new guys in. Talk to the starting five, tell them what you want. What was the worst that could happen, not be able to score. WE WERE NOT SCORING ANYWAYS! To sum it up I think Billy is a good guy, Truly dedicated to the game of basketball but I think he is way in over his head here. This is the University of Kentucky, the winningest program in NCAA history currently, don’t get me started on that, and we have to win or at least look good loosing and keep games close and we are unable to do that at this time. Do to my carpel tunnell kicking in I must go, Thanks to all who read this. Hopefully this is the first step in recovering from my broken blue heart due to last night! C-A-T-S CATS! CATS! CATS!
One More Vote for Ending the Honeymoon. . .
and I would like nothing better than to be shown wrong. I can step up & admit that I was wrong, but where are the preparations for each opponent, my god, didn’t we scout Miss St & have a game plan. They have the number one shot blocker in the country – we try to take it to him & get blocked. They have one of the top shooting 3-point teams in the country – they have a career night on us. DUHHHHHHHHHHH!
I understand the frustration....
but I think the absolute WORST thing we could do right now is force out a coach without the reasonable prospect of finding a better replacement. Too often teams get rid of a coach thinking change is for the best. But without a better replacement, you’re only making it worse for the program as a whole. I forgot who mentioned this earlier, but the revolving door at Notre Dame (football) is the perfect analogy for this. Even if he isn’t the right man for the job, BCG needs to remain at Kentucky until we have someone capable of replacing him (Travis Ford??).
Between The Wedding and Divorce
There is suppose to be a marriage. Even the analogy ‘the honeymoon is over" only implies that the “ideal” is gone and reality sets in. There should be an attempt to make the marriage work, with all its flaws, before attorney’s are hired. After all, Coach G is not coaching another team on the side :-)
Sure, coach is not perfect but he has the passion and the drive to improve and the desire to win. I spent countless hours defending Tubby the same way. Let us not forget the list of coaches that were not interested in the vacancy the last time because of the perception, right or wrong, that fickle fans chased him away and that the pressure of the job became too much.
I really believe UK will be OK :)
From my latest song:
“I have no evidence but I believe it will work out, somehow
We live in the present tense and the past has let us down
With a ray of hope could you see?
If I offered you proof would you believe?
A kindred spirit is all I need”
Blame the weather
As soon as the temperature in Lexington returns to normal, the Cats will “heat up” again and return to their winning ways.
Yours Truly,
Mel Gibson’s character in “Conspiracy Theory.”
(I say this, of course, in jest. But you cannot deny that the Cat’s current losing streak has coincided with the ice storms and record low temps that have plagued Lexington in the past two weeks.)
Totally Off the Subject, but
is anyone other than me, a little disappointed at Ashley Judd’s comments lately?
Not disappointed...you can expect that from the 'Hollywood Crowd'
…and I know whe doesn’t live there. I am disgusted.
'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'
what are the comments?
no need to repeat it here, but link?
GO BIG BLUE!! GO BIG BLUE!!
by UKWildCatFanatic on Feb 4, 2009 12:16 PM EST up reply actions
Here's a couple:
http://www.kentucky.com/963/story/682790.html
http://www.dcexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/YeasandNays/Ashley_Judd_Breathless_0127.html
Basically commenting after the election. " It’s so nice to live in America again…"
'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'
Disagreement with the post
I have to disagree with you Tru. This was not a game where Kentucky ran into a buzzsaw tonight. True, Miss. St. shot well from beyond the arc. True, Varnardo played a very good game. This game was lost not on the defensive end, even though we had some defensive lapses, this game was lost on the offensive end.
I will not talk about the lack of offensive sets, others have done so. I will not talk about players not named Patterson or Meeks being afraid to shoot, others have done so. What concerns me, and possibly this is just me, is that I do not see any player development on our team. It doesn’t seem to me as if any player has made any individual progress in his offensive skill set in two years. Ramon still can’t dribble or hit a mid-range shot. If it is not a dunk, Perry Stevenson has no inside move to call upon. Heck, I don’t see Patrick taking and making ten footers either, most of his points are due to hustle off of rebounds (at least that is the appearance to me). I can accept losses, hell I attended UK during the probation years and while Bill Curry was coaching football (top that two-fer). I have trouble accepting a lack of improvement, and I am not seeing any growth from this team at all. Hopefully, things will improve as I have a couple of kids that need to be indoctrinated into the Kentucky fold before my inlaws convert them to Louisville fans.
You can't defend ...
… 27 foot shots. People are going to get looks at three, and you can’t challenge every one, especially when the team you are playing is much, much quicker than you are at 3 positions.
I don’t think you’ve thought this through. Think about it — when Perry Stevenson tried to crowd his man, he blew past him into the lane for layups or passes for dunks, so he backed off, and got jumpers stuck in his eye. That’s what happens with mismatches like that. We had them too, but we were unable to take advantage of them offensively. Except for a stretch late in the second half, our defense was about as good as it gets against at team like this. They just hit shots, and we didn’t. We got plenty of good shots, but they were either blocked, intimidated or missed.
You simply cannot successfully guard a team that has four three-point shooters, especially if they are on, unless you can match their quickness. This is fundamental basketball reality. They can spread you out and get looks by penetrating and drawing the d. When you back off, they shoot in your face. The only real defense for a team like Kentucky is the relatively low percentage shot that a three is. But you have to score enough to compete, and they successfully took all our scoring away.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Did you read my post?
I did not take issue with UK’s defense. Heck, they held State to 66 points, incredible 3’s and all. We only scored 57 and that was not due to the pace of the game. With a couple of minutes to go, it was in doubt as to whether or not we would score 50. I generally like the defense that we play; it needs to be tweaked at times, but I can handle it. The offense is where I have problems. No player seems to have gotten better on the offensive side of the court this season.
I read it ...
… but upon reread, I think it’s clear I didn’t properly comprehend it. :-) Sorry, my attention is kind of scattered right now.
I agree that the offense is the problem. I think anytime a team shoots 14-27 from three, and plays such excellent defense against you, the term “buzz saw” is certainly applicable. :-)
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Ahhhhh, isn't that sweet!
Listen, you have to call a spade a spade. I too am a Kentucky fan and it hurts me to have to say this but the fact of the matter is there is no reason why we are loosing other than we are getting out-coached. We play Ole Miss and their 3 best players are out with knee injuries, we get beat. We play South Carolina who has their 3 best players out and a first year head coach and get beat. We play Miss st. and we should know they are faster than us, we should know they like to shoot the three and we get beat. UK’s main problem is we are not making in game adjustments! Again, yes you give people 27 foot three point shots, but not if they are making them! We have two of the best shot blockers/shot alterers in the country so if we have to pick our poison I say get your John Y. Brown hind parts out there and guard them and if they get around you there will be two of your worst nightmares waiting for you in the paint. Someone else said there is no improvement and for that I say, We have a winner! These guys are not getting any better as the season or Billy’s coaching career moves on. I watched Florida play the other night, I saw Donovan performing more ingame coaching in ten minutes than I have seen Gillespie do in 10 months! And don’t get me started on the fact I saw the UF guards bringing the ball over half court and actually calling plays and running the floor. I haven’t seen us call a play in 2 yrs. I like Billy Gillespie, I really do. I admire his dedication to the game and I admire his ambition. Yet, as bad as I want to I will never be the greatest three point shooter in NCAA history because I do not have the ability. I swear to you, I hope I am wrong. I hope UK turns it around and Billy Gillespie is the greatest coach college basketball has ever seen (just as long as he is at UK when it happens) but I just do not see it. He has shown me he is an outstanding recruiter, but coaching wise I am far from impressed. Riddle me this Batman, is it better to be able to recruit a ton of talent and not be able to get them to win or coach mediocre talent to many victories. But ahhhhhh, isn’t that sweet, everyone wants to blame everything from players having career nights to the weather outside. If you ask me we have the greatest fan base, far superior facilities and a cornicopia more talent than any of the last three teams we have lost to. So in the grand scheme of things I have covered facilities, players and fans so where are we lacking. The most important part of the formula, a great coach! If you can change my mind I would appreciate it but I don’t think you will be able to. And before you ask, no I do not know who we could get that could do a better job I just know in poker as soon as you realize you can’t win with a hand, you fold.
Getting OutSCORED Maybe
Players play, coaches coach.
WAY more often, it’s the former (not the latter) that determines W or L.
by FortyYearCatFan on Feb 5, 2009 4:45 PM EST up reply actions
Poker? Lol
This is not a short term fix as is the game of Poker. Come on that is ridiculous.
I still believe that patience is the key with this young team and Coach. And yes, it takes a lot of patience and intestinal fortitude, which many, many of the BBN do not have.
poler
does that mean if you can’t win the game, you give up and wait for the next one?
GO BIG BLUE!! GO BIG BLUE!!
by UKWildCatFanatic on Feb 5, 2009 7:53 PM EST up reply actions
poker, not poler
GO BIG BLUE!! GO BIG BLUE!!
by UKWildCatFanatic on Feb 5, 2009 11:40 PM EST up reply actions
Great coaches ...
… are made, not born.
I understand your points, even though I disagree. One thing, though — paragraphs are your friend.
I think Gillispie has the ability, but not the experience, but he is getting that experience now. We knew when we hired him (well, at least those of us who actually bothered to look at his record) that he wasn’t going to come in and make UK a national force in two years. You can take this to the bank — barring moral turpitude, he is here for four years minimum. It doesn’t matter how many boosters get their panties in a wad, or threaten to do whatever. It may get unpleasant around the BBN much like it did at the end of Smith’s term, but Barnhart is not going to abandon his hire without giving him a fair chance.
Your poker analogy is flawed. I can tell you’ve never really played Texas Hold ’em. Sometimes the worst hand becomes the best hand if you hold on long enough.
If we don’t learn some patience around here, we will become like Notre Dame football, and quite frankly, I don’t want to go there.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
I am LOVIN it. Point on.
…you even got that daggone Texas Hold’em game right.
'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'
Heh.
Never said I didn’t gamble a little. :-)
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
First 2 Years
Rupp was great his first 2 years. He won SEC title and Helms Trophy in his 3rd year (21-3, UK’s first 20 W season over).
Hall was so-so his first 2 years. He made it to NC game and finished runner-up to UCLA in his 3rd year.
Sutton was pretty good his first 2 years. He had a strong 3rd year but got into NCAA trouble for recruiting violations that year.
Pitino was pretty decent his first 2 years. He came within a Christian Laettner Miracle of FF in his 3rd year.
Tubby was very good his first 2 years. His 3rd year was decent but a drop-off from the first 2 years.
Odds are, UK coaches do very well in their 3rd season of coaching at UK.
Gillispie deserves that chance, too.
by FortyYearCatFan on Feb 6, 2009 7:20 AM EST up reply actions
Looks to me that the other coaches were good in at least the second year. Am I missing something?
'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'
Well, Hall was 13-13 in his second year.
So I’m thinking the answer to your question is, “Yes.” :-)
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Well...
I guess one can take comfort that Gillispie’s 2nd year team has exceeded that wins total.
Seriously, (and I know you will ‘hammer’ over this assessment) I kind of feel sorry for the coach…he’s getting it from all angles, 1) Is he recruiting the right players, 2) Does he compare to you know who…heck, he chose to leave so that shouldn’t even be an issue, 3) How does he compare to all the other coaches over the years, etc. It just seems to me that he is suffering far more scrutiny than anyone else. Good grief. I often say that the character of a man can be judged by the acts of his children. You can say alot about this team, I guess, but from afar there is not a player that you can’t root for [maybe with the slight exception of Liggins? :) ]..they are good guys that try hard that stay out of trouble and go to class. You’d think at some point that would be recognized and appreciated…and then cut him a little slack.
'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'
No, I see your point.
Gillispie’s getting more grief than Pitino ever did, to be sure. But Pitino exceeded expectations by so very far (you have to remember the state of the program in those days) that he built up an enormous reservoir of good will.
Smith won a championship the first year on the job. That gets you a lot of slack, even from people that dislike you and never wanted you at Kentucky (of which there were some, most of which came around, but not all).
Hall’s situation was similar to Gillispie’s, and he wound up getting quite a bit of grief. I remember that well. I think Joe B. Hall’s first couple of years were about as close an analogy as we have. Maybe Forty could correct me on that if I’m wrong.
This is hopefully just growing pains.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Nope, U R Correct
Hall in 1973 (lucky to win SEC) and 1974 (13-13 = Rupp’s worst record in 41 seasons) was on Thin Ice with many fans back then.
The 1974 recruiting class (Givens, Robey, Lee, Phillips, Hall) was MUCH better than 2 straight NR classes in 1972 and 1973.
The recovery from 98-74 L to IU in Dec 74 was far from certain when UK was L-ing badly to UNC the next game. But UK did recover (in that game and the rest of the season).
The W over IU in March 1975 was a watershed game for Joe Hall.
by FortyYearCatFan on Feb 6, 2009 2:24 PM EST up reply actions
Well it's always tough to follow a legend
…so I suspect that was one reason that it may have been tough on Joe B. regardless of the performance.
'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'
Denny Crum Was A Legend
That’s why Pitino has suffered by comparison.
Crum = 2 NC, 6 FF in 30 years at U of L.
Pitino = 0 NC, 1 FF in 7.5 years at U of L.
by FortyYearCatFan on Feb 6, 2009 4:31 PM EST up reply actions
Rupp Was (No Doubt) But That Was 1932
Hall 13-13 in 1974. Sutton 18-11 in 1987. Pitino 22-6 in 1991. Tubby 28-9 in 1999.
Some good, some no so good.
by FortyYearCatFan on Feb 6, 2009 1:01 PM EST up reply actions
To the critics
I guess it depends on your definition of short term. We all have watched for a year and a half and seen no improvement! I am not saying we have to win every game, but we should be able to keep 9 out of 10 losses at least respectable. For those of you joining the conversation late, not fully aware of previous conversations I absolutely hate this but the facts are the facts. We are not improving as a team and though making shots and playing defense come from the players, the coach has to be able to give the kids the tools to win and frankly I don’t see it.
As far as my poker analogy, yeah I realize a basketball program and a poker game are very different, duh. But the principal is the same. When it becomes obvious you can’t win you fold, and no I am not talking about the current game and go to the next one. Please try to keep up, if we can not win we should make a change. And since we are diagnosing peoples Texas hold’em experience. I have played quite a bit and let me tell those you a person who hangs on to those “worst cards” too far into the hand waiting on them to become the best hand I say. Pleeeeeeease lets play some poker, you people only win 1 out of every 10 hands. Here’s a lesson, its called chasing and its not good most of the time.
I agree with alot of what you say tru, but respectfully not this time. If substantial experience is what he is lacking I have five words for you, Travis Ford and John Pelphrey! Both of these guys have proven to have the ability but experience was the problem. I love UK basketball, and unlike some of our fans I know there will be losses most of which will be painful. It would be asking too much for a coach to come in here and win 90% of his games and a national championship but is asking a coach to come in here and show improvement for the first couple of years asking to much? Nope, it is what is expected! Tru there are your paragraphs, How’s my punctuation?
Well ...
… I would say that we have seen improvement, wouldn’t you? Compare last year’s record to this year, and realize that our recruiting class didn’t yield even one starter.
John Pelphry and Travis Ford? You cannot be serious. Just look at what has happened to Pelphrey? How has he earned a shot at coaching Kentucky? Ford? Currently has a losing record in the big twelve, and won’t make the tourney this year. Not much of an issue because it is only his first year, but seriously, can you claim that either of these two men are better coaches than Gillispie based on what they have done? If you can, I can’t wait to see your reasoning.
Having played at Kentucky is not a qualification for coaching. Kyle Macy was a great player at Kentucky, and for my money, he couldn’t hold Gillispie’s jock strap as far as coaching is concerned. No offense intended to Macy or anyone else, just reality. Pelphrey and Ford have an awful lot to prove before they should be considered for a nanosecond, should the UK job come open any time soon.
There are better coaches in America than Gillispie, but neither of the names you mention are among them, at least not yet.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Sorry, I can only respond with one word here...
Wow.
'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'
Well...
I disagree respectfully. I never said Pelphrey or Ford were better coaches than Gillespie. What I said was if a lack of experience we are willing to overlook, why didn’t they get a shot. I heard people screaming for Pelphrey and Ford and thought it was absurd. I, like you it sounds, do not want Pelphrey or Ford here yet but you are looking at the situation in hind sight which as you know is always 20 20. As far as the recruiting class not yielding one starter, whose fault is that? The coaches. Even then I really can’t hold that against him, because usually if you recruit a starter it means you didn’t bring along the players you already had to fill the position. And whose job is it to bring them along, the coaches. As far as you have seen improvement, where is it. We are not running offensive plays it’s just a free for all street ball game. We rarely if ever play anything other than man to man defense. We rarely fall behind and make adjustments to change the outcome of the game unless luckily someONE gets on fire. I just don’t see it even though I wish I did. Let me ask you this, at one point is enough enough.
And then you bring a very valid point, we are UK! The winningest school in NCAA history with the greatest fan and second to none facilities. So if there are better coaches out there, why aren’t they here? Is the problem further up the chain of command. Were we failed by not giving us what we need as far as a coach goes? How long do you wait to make a change?
I think where we vary is you are seeing improvement that I am not. Looking down the road we have UF (I just threw up in my mouth a little) and UT (there it went again) coming up at Rupp. Both of the before mentioned are better teams than what we have already lost to. So will it be 4 consecutive losses at home, I sure hope not. I guess we will just have to wait and see what happens but the prospect doesn’t look good in my eyes. Keep in mind, I wasn’t lying when I said I verbally faught tooth and nail with colleagues and co-workers about giving Billy a chance. But there comes a time when you have to say it’s just not going to happen and for me and me alone that time came in the first 6 minutes of the MSU game. For all that is Big Blue, I sure hope I am wrong. I appreciate all your input.
How long do you wait to make a change?
Definitely longer than a season and a half! I mean – come on! A season and a half and you have already decided that he cant get it done???? Wow.
by kentuckygirl0724 on Feb 6, 2009 12:08 PM EST up reply actions
Well ...
… we did go with a lack of experience, but my heavens, compared with the records of Travis Ford and John Pelphrey at the time, Gillispie looked like Roy Williams. If Pelphrey or Ford do well at their current schools and the job comes open again, I fully expect them to be interviewed. My point was that their UK playing days, plus the limited and relatively marginal success they have had so far, does not qualify them to coach the most storied team in the nation.
Better coaches aren’t here because they felt they already had a more comfortable situation. Billy D. turned us down cold. Many coaches announced they would not consider the UK job, and not to even contact them. Why? I suppose because not everyone wants to climb under the magnifying glass. UK is a job that can break you just as well as make you.
You wait four years. After that, you can consider your options. Before that, you can only consider a change if there is some kind of moral turpitude. That is sane, rational and even though it may not be fast enough for everyone, it is the right way to do business.
As far as improvement is concerned, I think we have seen it. It may not suit you, or me, but some things do take time. We have some holes in our roster right now that we just can’t fill fast enough, but by next year, we will hopefully have addressed most of them, and should be a lot better unless both Meeks and Patterson pack their bags. Trying to run off a coach after 18 months or even two years isn’t exactly unprecedented, but then how are you going to convince someone to take a chance on the UK job? UK’s brand isn’t what it once was, primarily because of the way the whole Smith thing went down. It may not be fair, but most people think that UK gave Smith the shaft. If Gillispie gets fired after even two or three years, I’m quite positive they will say the same thing about him.
You cannot keep running a program onto the rocks of public opinion and hope to land a great coach. We have just done it once, and now you are suggesting we should do it again? And what about Barnhart? You think he wouldn’t look like an incompetent firing a coach after only two years on the job, a guy who is clearly working his butt off? Not gonna happen. There is more at stake here than just assuaging the feelings of a few grumpy fans.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Sutton, Pitino (Comparison)
Eddie Utton was 77-21 (26 W, 7 L) in the first 75% of his UK tenure.
Rick Pitino was 150-43 (25 W, 7 L) in the first 75% of his UK tenure.
The final 25% is what we all remember for both. 13-19 for Sutton and NCAA sanctions.
69-7 for Pitino and the High Speed Lane on the Glory Road.
by FortyYearCatFan on Feb 6, 2009 4:46 PM EST up reply actions
Perfect point.
It’s a shame, but that’s the way the human mind works. After years go by, more sober, objective looks may paint a different picture than the “reality” that becomes ingrained in the minds of partisans.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
POKER LESSON
I have a buddy whose dad played ALOT of poker down in Tunica – he was good (unfortunately he passed away a couple of years ago, but not after living a full life)
Anyway, a younger guy asked him for some pointers on poker and my friends dad told him to meet him at a certain casino at 1:00. the guys shows up at 1:00 and waits and waits. My friends dad shows up at 5:00 and the young guy says “you told me to be here at 1:00”. my friends dad says “you just learned your first lesson about playing poker: patience.”
thats our lesson for the night boys and girls: Patience…….
by memphis wildcat on Feb 6, 2009 10:59 PM EST reply actions

by 














