A Sea Of Blue: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: USA Today / SB Nation Consensus MMA Rankings for October

Kentucky 59, South Carolina 77:  Postmortem

Btn_ball_medium

As you can see, I haven't given up on writing the postmortem, I just didn't want to do so last night.  It was just a bad end to a tough day for me, and with the 'Cats throwing in this clunker, I just wasn't thinking clearly enough to articulate anything worthy of being on this site.  Even though my sleep was fitful at best last night, a few cups of coffee and a slow start to the morning have enabled me to collect my thoughts, and write something other than plattitudes and angry ad hominem.

I congratulated South Carolina last night but I want to do so again, primarily because I feel like I was such a sourpuss about it.  They were absolutely what I wish Kentucky was -- a team that played with confidence and poise, able to handle and play through adversity and take advantage of opportunities as they present themselves.  That's the kind of team that deserves to win in the SEC, and I'm sure Darrin Horn is proud of how his charges have performed this year.  He is right to be.  Horn himself aught to be in any reasonable discussion for coach of the year in the SEC for what he has done.  So again, I want to say, "Well done!" to the Gamecocks.

Star-divide

Turning, as we must, to the Wildcats, I am obviously disappointed in the outcome.  I am also disappointed in the effort the team gave last night, and I am quite certain I am joined in that regard by most of the Big Blue Nation.  Patrick Patterson and DeAndre Liggins were the only players out there last night who gave an effort worthy of the jersey they wore.  I say that advisedly, because even though they gave a strong effort, they did not play well, just hard.

I know some of you may think that Landon Slone deserves a mention, but Slone was so overmatched that his effort was irrelevant.  It would be like putting a random fan on the floor with a Kentucky jersey and asking him to guard Devan Downey.  That fan may give more effort than anyone out there, but his impact on Downey would not be measurable by methods currently known to science.  Slone's was measurable only in fouls.

I think it's time for us to face the fact that Coach Gillispie has largely failed this year.  I use the term "failed" in the sense that it is clear to me that he has not gotten anywhere near the most out of this team for whatever reason.  Part of it is surely his fault -- he has stubbornly refused to change his game plan regardless of the opponent, and that philosophy has not worked well.  Now, before we get a bunch of coach bashing happening, let me continue.  What I just said doesn't mean it can't work well, it just hasn't with this team.  They have not been able to execute offensively with any consistency, and when mismatches are forced on the team by circumstances, this year's version of the 'Cats has universally responded poorly on both offense and defense.

We don't know why, but we do know this -- it has happened 100% of the time.  When we have a bad matchup at the point guard, UK has lost nearly every game this season with the exception of a narrow win over Florida at home.  Gillispie cannot fail to know that Porter will be beaten every time off the dribble and hounded into turnovers by superior point guards, but he either doesn't care or feels that he has no other option available that he can live with.  We don't know what goes into his decision making, so I think we just have to point to the results and say that they are poor, and the coach just has to take the blame for them.

Storyend_dingbat_medium

It seems that Kentucky is very tentative against teams where they know they have matchup problems, and that shows up everywhere.  That's why the 'Cats lost so badly -- this UK team clearly had zero confidence it could beat South Carolina last night, and that assessment became a self-fulfilling prophecy, in spades.  Michael Porter bringing the ball up against Devan Downey was a hopeless situation, something the Coach Gillispie could not fail to know.  Yet there he was, doing it anyway.  We all know what the definition of insanity is, and I think we have to admit that for 11 minutes at least, Coach Gillispie was insanity made flesh.  Exactly what you would expect to happen did happen.  Exactly.

Gillispie's strategy in every single game this year, regardless of opponent, has been the same -- get the ball to Patterson or Meeks first, and there is no plan B.  That has worked some games, and some games it has failed, but he has been nothing if not consistent.  Last night, despite being behind by 20+ points, UK did not shoot three point shots -- it threw the ball into the post every single possession.  The team executed Gillispie's plan pretty well, but the plan failed utterly.  I have no idea how many touches Patterson got, but he took 24 shots, his high for the year by a significant amount.

South Carolina was not even trying real hard to deny Patterson the ball, and incredibly, it worked.  If Patterson had shot his normal 70%, the game would have been 14 points closer.  Alas, for various reasons, he shot 41%, not quite a season low for games in which he took >=10 shots, but close.  Another thing we never saw from Patterson was a pump fake or a kick-out.  Everything was just take it straight to the hole, and as often as not, the shot came back out.  I'll keep my own council on how that could have happened, but as in every game, you have to make adjustments.

Speaking of adjustments, many comments have been made about Gillispie's failure to adjust, and last night was a case study in just that.  Defensively, you have to stay at home on South Carolina, because Downey is going to get into the lane.  You have to trust whoever is guarding him to recover enough to use their greater height to affect his shot in the lane.  That didn't happen.  The defense collapsed on Downey every time he got into the lane.  The results were as predictable as the tides -- kickouts to open three point shooters and dunks by open big people.

With the exception of Patterson and Liggins, Kentucky virtually gave up in the second half.  That's frustrating to us fans, because we remember times when the 'Cats would lay it all on the line for 40 minutes.  This team, as Gillispie has rightly pointed out, lacks toughness.  Not physical toughness, but rather, mental toughness.  When the chips get down, the team gets down and begins to mope.  I don't know what you can do about that, but the saying is, "Attitude reflects leadership."  I'm looking at you, coach.  To be fair, though, there is only so much coaching can do.  You have to have something to work with, and instilling mental toughness where none currently exists is a long-term prospect.

I keep hearing from Gillispie how well this team practices.  All I can say about that is if they practice well and play poorly, something must be wrong with practice.  You sometimes see players do that, but I have never heard of a team that practiced well and played poorly as many times as Kentucky has this year.  That tells me that practice is somehow broken.  The relevant saying here is, "Practice doesn't make perfect.  Perfect practice makes perfect."  Apparently, we are either practicing imperfectly, or practicing the wrong things.  There doesn't seem to be a third possibility.

Matt Jones made good point today when he suggested that he did not put the players in a position to succeed.  He also criticized the game plan as ineffective, but the truth of the matter is that the game plan is the same every single time, and has been all year.  It works against some teams (Tennessee) and fails against others (MSU, South Carolina).  Gillispie apparently believes that if you do it hard enough, this game plan will work every time.  During the off season (which could be coming sooner than most of us hope), he will have plenty of time to reflect on the validity of that judgment.

Ultimately, I believe Coach Gillispie has been unsuccessful with the team this year.  That isn't meant as a damning comment -- it happens.  For a very recent example, just look at Florida, a team that is unquestionably more talented but is struggling every bit as much as UK is, and with a two-time national championship coach.  It's easy to blame the coach for everything, but coaches have bad years too, and the players still have to give it their all.  I think we can safely say that last night at least, we had a lot of players who did not give their all.  Gillispie did well last year, getting Coach of the Year honors for his effort.  This year, he has done poorly.  "Do the same thing, but harder," just hasn't worked.  It may work with a more talented team, who knows?  Hopefully, we'll find out next year.

As for this year, I have no more hopes except as it relates to the next game on the schedule.  The post-season is meaningless to me at this point.  I am taking each game as though it is the last, because all too soon, it will be.  Hopefully, the answers will come in our outstanding recruiting class.  If not ... well, I just don't care to ponder that.  I have enough disappointment to deal with right now.

0 recs  |  Comment 206 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Very GOOD Analysis

If only UK players had put in the effort you did…

Little tidbit about Horn. I got to the game about 5:30 PM way before amny fans did.

Horn came out and greeted, chatted with USC fans in the stands for about 30 minutes. He’s really making an effort to connect with their fans.

by FortyYearCatFan on Feb 26, 2009 10:26 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Very cool.

He is doing very well. I am proud of an ex-Kentucky boy.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Truzenzuzex on Feb 26, 2009 11:08 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Horn's effort to establish a basketball culture at USC has to be one of the best things about him...

He’s reeled in fans that were apathetic about basketball for years. That’s an accomplishment and it’s not just meant to make us feel good. It will pay dividends with more fans putting their money up to support the team and it will help us get recruits to come play in Columbia.

Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans. http://www.garnetandblackattack.com

by Gamecock Man on Feb 26, 2009 12:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Horn

While I totally hate his haircut I really like the way he has gone about creating a batter bball culture in SC. It’s kind of like Pearl’s situation when he first got to UT but Horn does it without being an annoying jacka**.

DEEETROIT BASKETBALLL!!!

by davw83 on Feb 26, 2009 2:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Heh. So true.

I’d much rather have Horn, who is changing the culture by being a class act that quietly goes about showing what he can do for our hoops program, to Pearl, who uses one gimmick after another. Pearl is such a tool. Although you can’t say he hasn’t improved things in Knoxville, so I guess it takes all types.

Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans. http://www.garnetandblackattack.com

by Gamecock Man on Feb 26, 2009 7:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I wasn't able to watch the game, I guess that turned out well for me

I can’t imagine how I would have reacted watching the game you described Tru. I really have no confidence that Gillispie possesses the ability or desire to reflect on his coaching style. His continuing stubbornness in making necessary changes to adjust to how different teams play is just mind-boggling.

At this point I seriously question whether he has the coaching talent to win a national championship or even get to a Final Four no matter how much talent he has. At some point in March you always face a team that does something that requires some kind of adjustment to your basic game plan and Gillispie has yet to show he can and will do that.

I like important stuff just as much as the next guy, but please, for a little while, deliver us from meaning, baseball. That's your greatest glory, and we thank you for it very, very much. -- Craig Calcaterra

by JLeverenz on Feb 26, 2009 10:37 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

My feelings as well

Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."

by chirop1 on Feb 26, 2009 5:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Nailed It!

Even in times of turmoil & tumult you have a unique way of presenting circumstances clearly & succinctly. If only our coach could convey the same. He is the worst I ever remember at communicating his views to us, the fans, the media & I wonder if he has the same problem with the players?????

Pride goeth before the fall.

by Bluegilla on Feb 26, 2009 10:41 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

I

just want to cry.

by tenken on Feb 26, 2009 10:54 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

The truth hurts

Some of us came to the realization sooner.

The man may have it in him to make the adjustments necessary, and I truly hope he does (for all our sakes) but to this point he hasn’t shown it yet.

Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."

by chirop1 on Feb 26, 2009 5:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

If you had told me before the game

that we would shoot only 2 fewer field goals (we shot 26 fewer the first time), win the free throw and rebounding numbers, and pp and meeks combined for 46, I would have said we win this game easy.

Never thought we could see 16 blocks for USC. Never thought players 3-10 would combine for 13 points. Never thought we would double down in the post, given our size advantage. Never thought we would sag weakside defenders into the paint and leave open shooters. Never thought our players or BG could be so unprepared to play such a huge game.

It's the end of the line. I'm the firstborn. Sick of playing second fiddle. Always third in line for everything. Tired of finishing fourth. Being the fifth wheel. There are six things I'm mad about, and I'm taking over. -UK Basketball (Gob from A.D.)

by ChiroCat on Feb 26, 2009 10:58 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Excellent Postmortem, Tru

It’s hard to disagree with anything you said.

GBB!!!

by OGETARTS on Feb 26, 2009 10:59 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Outstanding

A sobering analysis tinged with sadness. No anger. It seems that this is where we all need to be at this point in this season and in the second year of a new coach’s tenure. Disappointed but not despairing.

by Fortunatus on Feb 26, 2009 11:01 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Every loss

except for the Vandy loss, came because of quick and talented guard play. VMI, UNC, Miami, UL, Ole Miss, USC, MSU, and USC again.

Who did we beat that plays like this? Auburn is guard heavy and quick, but not nearly as talented as the above teams. UF is talented, but not as quick as the above teams.

I really hope this is a personnel issue, not a Gillispie issue or trend. Coaches are constantly looking for ways to improve, just like players. This has to be item #1 on BG’s list of offseason improvements to make.

It's the end of the line. I'm the firstborn. Sick of playing second fiddle. Always third in line for everything. Tired of finishing fourth. Being the fifth wheel. There are six things I'm mad about, and I'm taking over. -UK Basketball (Gob from A.D.)

by ChiroCat on Feb 26, 2009 11:03 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Oh no!

Not that again!!!

by slidemank on Feb 26, 2009 11:10 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

One issue, Tru
You have to trust whoever is guarding him to recover enough to use their greater height to affect his shot in the lane. That didn’t happen.

I don’t know if that will work against Downey or any other guard who can make layups. If anything, it just makes your trailing guard be reaching for contesting the shot, which can lead to quick and cheap fouls and lots of FTs.

My thought was that the guard who got beat stays with his man the best he can until just after entering the paint. But running in, he should be looking to see if there are any wingmen open and start running. If our guards are cheating down on the wings on those drives (which they should), then the guard should stay at the top of the paint to contest any 3s up top. The guard should also be ready to make a run in on a rebound.

I don’t mind collapsing on defense, but the guys NOT collapsing have to be in position to do something. Regardless, having 3 Wildcat players attempting to deter one shot is just terrible execution.

Other than that, Tru, I pretty much see eye-to-eye with you. Liggins had a good statistical game, and he did play with some passion, which are both good signs. But he really needs to understand the whole offense, or at least understand that he doesn’t have to make every amazing pass he sees.

by TheFakeGimelMartinez on Feb 26, 2009 11:22 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Great Post Tru, but don't forget...

BCG may not have put his players in a position to succeed last night, but the previous UK coaching staff did not put Gillispie in much of a position to succeed either. All of our upper classmen besides Jodie Meeks are not UK quality players and very inconsistent. And inconsistent players yield inconsistent results on the court. That’s why Perry Stevenson plays great one game, then disappears the next 3. Solid and consistent play from upperclassmen are the key for any college basketball team to be successful. And this UK team lacks that type of play.

With that said I’m not saying BCG does not deserve some of the blame – he does. But to assess the current state of the program and it’s disfunction, one has to assess when that disfunction began. To me, the UK program has not been the same since Chuck Hayes departed the program in 2005. It was in these years when recruiting really began to suffer, and because of this, the program has slid into mediocrity.

The lesson we should all learn from this current situation is that recruiting is the life blood of any successful college athletic program and can’t be taken for granted. All the successful programs recruit the best players. I believe BCG is trying very hard to get the UK program back to getting these type of players. It shows with the class coming in next year. However it could take 2 more good recruiting classes to get the UK program back to challenging for SEC and NCAA titles (unless Patterson and Meeks stay for another year, that will help). But I’m not sure UK fans have that much patience. As for me, I’m reserving judgement on BCG until he has “his” players in the system. I think we owe him that much.

by Sharpera on Feb 26, 2009 11:29 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

I would almost guarantee,

Tubby would have this team in a better place this late in the season. How many times do you remember Tubby being run out of the gym? BCG does it every other game.

by bigbluefan on Feb 26, 2009 1:03 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You obviously did not watch...

Memphis run UK out of that cracker box gym in the Maui Classic a couple of years ago. Or the Indiana and Kansas games in 2006. That or your memory is failing you.

Flash back to Tubby’s last season at UK. He lost 5 out the last 7 regular season SEC games that season. With an arguably better roster than BCG has right now.

My post was not to bash the previous coaching staff – but to remind us why the program is underperforming right now. The program was underperforming at the end of the previous coaching staff’s tenure. That’s a fact.

by Sharpera on Feb 26, 2009 2:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Underperformance

I totally agree with you and want to add just a little to that, if I may.

I have heard people say, “I am tired of waiting for ‘next year,’” and complaing that they feel like UK is always “waiting for next year.” Well, I really think they feel that way because – seriously – we have all been saying “just wait till next year” or “next year will be better” for quite some time now but if you look at it honestly and objectively Billy has only been here for two of those “wait till next year” years. I think that there are some that are taking out frustrations on our current coach that have been around even longer than he has.

by kentuckygirl0724 on Feb 26, 2009 2:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Nothing wrong with

waiting for next year. UK fans need to realize that UK is not going to the final four, or win the SEC, for that matter, every year. It’s impossible in this era of College Basketball. But we can be optimistic about our future chances. The UK program is just in a down period right now. All successful programs have went through it, and some had coaching changes associated with it (UCLA a couple of years ago comes to mind). UK will be back! We have to give BCG time.

by Sharpera on Feb 26, 2009 2:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

i would also add

that BCG came in march of 2007 – most HS players had already signed.

had Patterson not waited, the current freshman class would have been his first class.

Patterson is here, thank goodness, and i don’t care who you give the credit to, the fact is that BCG had only gone through 1 complete recruiting season at uk.

yes i know he was recruiting other players, but he was recruiting players to come to TAM – not sure he would be necessarily recruiting the same players.

i am frustrated – but it is games like the UT game that really frustrate me more as they are the ones that lead me to believe we are better than we are.

if you had told me were were still in the running for a bye in the SECT with 3 games to go, i would have taken it…..

by memphis wildcat on Feb 26, 2009 3:47 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

First off, Im not calling for BCG's job,

so kygirl you can relax! I feel at this level, (unless the coach does something criminal) he should be given 4 years, but to even mention this guy in the same sentence as tubby, is a disrespect to the UK name!!!!! Sharpera do you remember 1998? Tubby took over a team that had lost everyone, had the lowest ranking since probation. That team didn’t have a fist team all-american, or a nba draft pick on it. He totaled one hundred wins faster than any other uk coach behind Rupp. Tubby use to make me mad, but I cant remember him ever making me as mad as last night! Now, I know Tubby isn’t our coach any more, and I’m ok with that, but I think people are very wrong if you blame this on Tubby…. I just don’t think BCG could carry Tubby’s jock strap!!!

by bigbluefan on Feb 26, 2009 3:48 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Memo

Didn’t you get Tru’s memo? No more anti- or pro- OTS.

by Wild Weasel on Feb 26, 2009 3:50 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry Tru,

Very! Its just I havn’t been this disapointed in the cats, in a long time. It’s like tru said, this coach and team are showing signs of insanity, and I think its starting to have a affect on me!

by bigbluefan on Feb 26, 2009 4:07 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The 1998 team

had Nazi Mohammed on it, who was a 1st round NBA draft pick. It also had Scott Padgett, who was drafted and played in the NBA. It also had Wayne Turner, who was a McDonald’s All American Point Guard. Not to mention Heshimu Evans and Jeff Shepard.That roster had tons of talent. You can’t compare the state of the program when Tubby came to UK vs when BCG came to UK. We had just came off 2 consecutive final fours when Tubby came to UK. We were coming off 2 consecutive first weekend exits from the tournament when BCG arrived. That’s why BCG needs time to rebuild the program. And it will happen if we give him time. You state above that he should be given 4 years, Well, give him 4 years, and if we are still performing the way we are now, then you can trash BCG. But until then, it’s pointless.

by Sharpera on Feb 26, 2009 7:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Nazr Became NBA Draft Pick Because Of His Play in 1998

Padgett became one because of his development in 1998 and 99.

Sheppard played much better in 1998 than any other year at UK.

Wayne Turner (the ONLY McDonalds A-A on 1998 roster) improved greatly in 1998 and 99.

Heshimu Evans was unproven until his development into SEC caliber player in 1998 and 99.

Tons of talent? No.

Good talent? Yes.

UK was coming off 2 straight FF in 1996 and 97. Why was recruiting so pathetic those 2 years? Neither 96 or 97 class was ranked in Top 25 classes.

by FortyYearCatFan on Feb 26, 2009 8:03 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I disagree

Padgett was a stud on the 1997 team that lost to Arizona. And his development that year lead him into 1998. He was also a 1st round NBA pick if I’m not mistaken.

Nazi Mohammed is still playing in the NBA.

Jamal Magloire, a 1st round NBA pick, also was on that team.

Sheppard was named the 1998 final four MVP.

by Sharpera on Feb 26, 2009 8:45 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Not Exactly

Padgett averaged 9 ppg on 97 team and shared PF with Jared Prickett.

He was Wooden All-American in 1998 and All-SEC in 1999.

Nazr was pitiful in 1996, decent in 1997, and All-SEC in 1998.

Magloire was fair in 1997, better in 1998 and 99, and All-SEC in 2000.

Sheppard had a minmal UK career in 1994-95-96-97 then excelled in 1998.

by FortyYearCatFan on Feb 26, 2009 8:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Nazi and Padgett

were good players in 1997. Yes they were better in 1998, but arent’ all players supposed to get better as they get older? Isn’t Meeks better now that he was as a Freshman under you know who?

by Sharpera on Feb 26, 2009 8:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The Maui classic'

Thats one of the first games of the year! Everything you say is very arguable. If BCG does anything close to what tubby did ,they’ll hang his name from the top of Rupp Arena! Please, BCG give me just one SEC title. Then Sharpera we can talk!!!!!

by bigbluefan on Feb 26, 2009 3:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

One Word

Last night’s L had NOTHING to do with former coach(es). It had EVERYTHING to do with present players and staff.

by FortyYearCatFan on Feb 26, 2009 7:25 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You're right

last night’s loss doesn’t have anything to do with former coaches. In my opinion, it has to do more with some of the current players than the current coaches.

by Sharpera on Feb 26, 2009 7:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Here we go again

DEEETROIT BASKETBALLL!!!

by davw83 on Feb 26, 2009 11:33 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Hope

It seems as though everyone has given up on this year. Yes it looks bad now, but on Saturday everyone was full of joy. This team and the way they play is a roller-coster. I do feel that Meeks and Patterson will play pissed off on Saturday, and the rest of the team will feed of this.

This season is not lost. This team is capable of hittin another high. UK must win 2/3 and one SEC tournament game to get in, but this is feasable. As a true fan I back my plaers, my coach, and maintain hope. Jumping ship right now does no one any good.

Keep the Faith,

Lane

by Laird on Feb 26, 2009 11:36 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

now THAT

was an absolutely amazing post. Truly. It made me depressed as HELL—yay, more depression this morning!!!—but it was so incredibly well-written and well-observed all the same.

by blue kentucky girl on Feb 26, 2009 11:39 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

All this talk about BCG

and his firing. Anyone out there, and I sincerely want to know, how long UNC kept Matt Doherty on?

by Bluegilla on Feb 26, 2009 11:41 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Doherty was national coach of the year his first season

That gets you some leeway. He was then 8-20 in 2001-2002 and then finished 19-16 playing in the NIT in 2002-2003.

It essentially took a player led mutiny to get him fired. He was there three years.

Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."

by chirop1 on Feb 26, 2009 5:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Player mutiny

I wonder if we are close to anything like that here?

by Bluegilla on Feb 26, 2009 6:05 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Long time reader, first time poster

No, BCG should have another year, but lets call out the asst. coaches and what they are doing to help teach the young’uns in practice. We should be seeing marked improvement consistently in our other players and that isn’t happening. Miller, Liggins, Harrison, Harris, Galloway, Stephenson are all so inconsistent that we are asked on another blog who will be the 3rd person to step up and we shouldn’t be asking that question this late in the season. I wonder if any “teaching” is going on in practice or are we relying on just being “schooled” by VMI, Vandy, MSU and USC. We are a two trick pony in a five trick circus and unless the others “pony up” we will not get a 10 seed in the “NIT” pick tournament.

by bradcatfan on Feb 26, 2009 11:42 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Right on!

Tru also mentioned the comments about great practices throughout the season. So one has to wonder what exactly happens in these great practices that is not translating into great games. Good post bradcatfan! Welcome……….

by slidemank on Feb 26, 2009 11:49 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Nail on the head!

Your commentary is absolutely dead on. Regarding the practices, Barry Booker & Dave Baker commented last night on how great Kentucky looked at the shoot-around earlier yesterday. So, what happened between then and last night? Did some alien team invade the blue jerseys? I was so disappointed last night that I had to leave the room for awhile in order to keep my cool. When the match up is poor, the players seem to give up, give in, and give out.

by ukkrazyintn on Feb 26, 2009 11:54 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

6 Straight Wins

We just need to go get it done. That should be good enough for 6 or 7 seed, and damage can be done from that seed. If this happens I will be pleased with the 08-09 season and looking forward to a great 09-10 season.

It's the end of the line. I'm the firstborn. Sick of playing second fiddle. Always third in line for everything. Tired of finishing fourth. Being the fifth wheel. There are six things I'm mad about, and I'm taking over. -UK Basketball (Gob from A.D.)

by ChiroCat on Feb 26, 2009 11:55 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Great attitude!!

I wish I could find the same!

by bigbluefan on Feb 26, 2009 12:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That is the difference between optimism and realism.....

…and based on past performances this season, that tells us the is a very slim chance of making a deep run in any tourney.
Now the optimist wants me to think otherwise, but…………………

by teambeam on Feb 26, 2009 6:33 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Matt Doherty

He was fired after only 2 years I beleive. BUT, there is one big differecne, his team had 4-5 NBA lottery picks. He had tons of talent and could not produce. UK does not have tons of latent right now, but they are heading in the right direction. So many fans complaiend that Tubby could not recruit or win in the tournament, but these same fans expect BG to come in (with the minimal talent recruited by Tubby) and win. NO, BG needs to have time to reruit his own kids. As I have said, one more year, pending Meeks and Patterson come back. If so, we should see signficant improvment next year. If at this time next year, UK is still inconsistent and losing games they should win, then I will start to question BG, but not until then.

Lane

by Laird on Feb 26, 2009 12:14 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Matt

was not only fired for on the court issues but the treatment and abuse of his players.

by tenken on Feb 26, 2009 12:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Answered above, but I'll post here as well

Doherty was national coach of the year for taking a depleted UNC squad to the #1 ranking in his first year and fans loved his firey attitude in comparison to the laid back Smith/Guthridge years. They slumped down the stretch and finished 26-7.

The second season was the notorious 8-20 season of 2001-2002.

In his third season he went 19-16 and lost in the NIT.

A player led mutiny got him fired. However, even without the players vote of no confidence, fans would not have stood for more than one more season like that.

Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."

by chirop1 on Feb 26, 2009 5:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Slone

I felt really sorry for poor Landon last night. I have to wonder what went through his mind when he had to guard Downey. Couldn’t have done wonders for his confidence.

by slidemank on Feb 26, 2009 12:49 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

You hit the hammer on the nail....

now take that hammer and wack BCG in the head with it!!

by bigbluefan on Feb 26, 2009 12:51 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Ha ha ha.......

I felt more like whackin myself in the head with it last night!!!

by slidemank on Feb 26, 2009 12:58 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Hammer

There were quite a few people that I felt like whacking with it.

by kentuckygirl0724 on Feb 26, 2009 1:00 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Speaking of hammers to the head. . .

. . . how’s your hangover?

C! A! T! S! CATS! CATS! CATS!

by NYCCats on Feb 26, 2009 1:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh its ok

Doesnt hurt nearly as badly as my pride.

by kentuckygirl0724 on Feb 26, 2009 1:55 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Where to start.....

I did not hear the post game interviews with BCG because I could really care less what he has to say and usually can read about it the following the games. So the first question that should have been asked (if it wasnt) was how UK can go into what is one of the biggest games of the year for winning the East as thoroughly unprepared and flat as they did? The coaching staff and players are equal partners in the egg laying that was last night’s disaster. There is no excuse for a Kentucky team to get beat that way by a team that isn’t as talented overall. It’s one thing to lose to a good team on the road but another alltogether to get blasted in every which way possible.

I do not believe BCG should be fired only because of the negative stigma of firing a coach so soon into his tenure. However I do not believe he is the coach for UK and didn’t when they hired him. This is a tiresome debate so i will leave it there because it doesn’t really matter waht we think in the grand scheme of things.

Slower Traffic Keep Right!

by SevenRings on Feb 26, 2009 1:17 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

It is our team!

I appreciate the fact that most people are still showing support for the coach and players and are not overly criticiizing them. They are our Cats and they still deserve our support.

by oldkentucky on Feb 26, 2009 1:22 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Tru

Thank you for getting the postmortem up this morning. It just would have not been the same ASOB that I have come to know and love w/o this. I don’t blame you at all for resting on this until today after what we saw last night.

I am very disappointed. I don’t understand that this team went from the great effort and team cohesion I saw Saturday to the one I saw last night.

You mentioned you had a bad day yesterday and it culminated with a loss. Wish it could have been a different outcome for everyone.

Thanks to you and Ken for your hard work on this blog.

by kykat51 on Feb 26, 2009 1:44 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Basic As 1, 3, 4

This will be lengthy but I ask that you please bear with me.

First, I waited until Tru posted his Post Mortem, and, Tru, it was worth the wait, your words not only give insight into the situation but also perceptiveness into to your passion and, indeed, love for UK basketball. It mirrors that of most of us I think.

Second, as a preamble, after the victory over Arkansas I posted on why I didn’t feel better about a double-digit road win without Patrick Patterson and gave some of my misgivings. After the win over the Vols I cautioned regarding FEAR: False Evidence Accepted as Reality, fools’ gold, if you will, and stated that such play was not presumptive against better coached, better prepared, better motivated teams such as the likely to be Gamecocks, and listed the ongoing deficiencies as I perceived them.

Now to the basic 1, 3, 4: UK does not at this time have an adequate — and I use the term literally — performer at either of those positions. To support that statement I offer the following:

Requisite traits of a point guard (1): Leadership, dribble penetration, passing/faking, 1 on 1 moves (offense & defense), perimeter shooting, conditioning. No UK player has all those and most have few. Will Liggins in the future? Problematic.

Requisite traits of a small forward (3): requires most athleticism of all positions, quick, strong, ability to slash, strength to post up, create own shot yet pass as well, perimeter shot, defend both larger and smaller players. No UK player has all those and most have few. Darius Miller is the player that comes closest but not now, future is problematic.

Requisite traits of a power forward (4): size and strength are mandatory, able to play back to basket or facing basket, ability to hit midrange shot, rebounding prime responsibility, defense of larger players, protect the paint. No UK player has all those and most have few. Actually Patrick Patterson is the player most physicall and mentally fit for this position but alas must be used at the 5. Should he remain a Cat and Daniel Orton meet expectations the problem might be addressable.

Therein lies the basis of Cats problems and Coach Gillispie’s dilemma. Please note that the title is Basic As 1, 3, 4, not Simple As 1, 3, 4, because it is quite a bit more complex with Gillispie’s enigmatic ideas and seeming obstinacy being factors. However IMO once the serious talent inadequacies are addressed the other difficulties will fall in line.

by Wild Weasel on Feb 26, 2009 1:45 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Good Observations

Meeks appears to be the only player who has the full set of basketball skills, and his handle needs work. Meeks is our only 3-point shooter. Our team ball handling is poor, but I can’t tell if that is lack of player skill or can be attributed to the stationary “offense” we run.

We’ll have Orton and Pilgrim coming on but neither apparently is a ball handler or shooter. Hood apparently can shoot the three, but will he play defense to Gillispie’s standard? Vilarino may be a promising point guard, but it will be a really pleasant surprise if he can take over the team as a freshman.

It takes great coaching to build a really good team when so many players lack critical skills. A predictable approach makes the coaching job and the playing more difficult.

by Fortunatus on Feb 26, 2009 2:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Not to piss in everyone's cheerios. . .

. . . but why does everyone seem to think that Vilarino is going to be a savior? From everything I’ve read, he has some clear limitations, to the point that it was even questioned when he was signed whether he was “good enough.” Why does everyone think that he will come in as a true freshman and be better than either Galloway or Liggins? I don’t get it. . .

C! A! T! S! CATS! CATS! CATS!

by NYCCats on Feb 26, 2009 3:50 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

After the game the other night...

I have to agree.

Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."

by chirop1 on Feb 27, 2009 8:02 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

For what it is worth...

I posted this on November 20th:

Folks, the fix isn’t coming this year…all the coaching in the world won’t solve the perimeter talent. Meeks is the only available shooter. PPat will have a difficulty having the impact he had last year w/o the support of Bradley and Crawford. Be prepared for a year long struggle….you can’t coach talent.

‘..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun…that’s the Chicago way..’

by HozeKing on Nov 20, 2008 7:55 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs

…and you probably forget the arguments and push back I got on this opinion.

'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'

by HozeKing on Feb 26, 2009 5:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

1-2-3-4

No PG because Jasper transferred and UK didn’t recruit a replacement for him. There were PG available in the spring. Liggins has PG skills but no idea how to use them to his advantage.

Darius Miller should be starting and much further along in development by now. He should be the WF. Why not start him?

Patrick Patterson is a PF playing out of position because UK failed to recruit a good C in 2008 class.

by FortyYearCatFan on Feb 26, 2009 7:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

What Prescience! What Confidence!

I’m impressed that you can tell that if there had been a “good” (whatever that is) 2008 center recruited that he would have been able to play and play immediately. With that kind of foresight and evaluation skills you should volunteer to consult college programs. BTW, I agree regarding Miller starting in place of Harris.

by Wild Weasel on Feb 26, 2009 10:03 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

So many things being repeated.........

 i was pondering the number of word/phrases we’ve been saying/hearing over and over after these losses: Lack of effort, lack of adjustment, no mental toughness, no consistency, unprepared, lost………I’m sure there are more I could add to the list but I’ll stop there.

How can a team play play some good hard-nosed ball one game and turn around the next game looking like they could get beat by a high school team? It’s truly disturbing to me. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again…….“I think there is something going on with this team internally that we can’t see”.

Some blame it on the coach, some on the players. But someone also mentioned accountability. I feel the coach and players are both accountable for the outcome.

Another thing that’s been said that I wholeheartedly agree with is I can deal with a loss but not with the way we lost. AND in a very big game that probably cost us #1 in the SEC and maybe an NCAA bid. Losing a well-fought game is one thing, but getting absolutely demolished late in the season is another.

I don’t know what the answer is (or if there is one at this point), but time is growing short for finding one……….

by slidemank on Feb 26, 2009 2:00 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Agreed,

we quit last night. I can handle the loss, but rolling over? NEVER!

by bigbluefan on Feb 26, 2009 4:27 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Quit? We Never Started

UK showed ZERO effort from start to finish last night.

by FortyYearCatFan on Feb 26, 2009 7:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The answer is simple

     We should have had 2 jets waiting outside after the game. One to bring our players home and one to take BCG back to Texas! Whether you beat around the bush and say we should give him a chance the fact of the matter is he can not coach. I’ ve said it all along, wins or losses are determined by how well I guys play only. BCG can not make adjustments, he can not give guys tools to succeed and he can not motivate these players. Players play yes, like soldiers fight, but there has to be a general to create and make sure his subordinates follow a GAME PLAN!

     There is not a more devoted UK fan on this blog than me, I love Kentucky basketball above all else yet the fact of the matter is we have made a mistake. Yes we! The only difference in myself and some of the other people here is I am willing to say it now as apposed to 2 years from now. Who do we get you ask? Let’s find a young coach who needs this opportunity who is running a sound, systematic team that maybe hasn’t won alot because he can not get talented players to come to his small school. Don’t say we can not take that kind of gamble because if you think BCG was anything more than a gamble when we hired him you are either seriously dillusional or smoking something illegal!

BCG does nothing more than throw OUR guys to the wolves everytime he takes the floor andi am sick of it. There are those who have said some of us are happy when we win and want to complain when we don’t. I am calling B.S. I think we look uncoached and terrible everytime we take the floor. Unless someone has an outstanding game we are going to lose. And don’t get me started again on how everyone has career nights against us. BCG is asleep at the wheel people, how long do we have to put up with this? I realize it has been a short amount of time, but it has been long enough to see he can not cut it at the greatest mens college basketball program in existence.

by kycatfan on Feb 26, 2009 2:36 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

kycatfan

Your answer is not simple…it is ridiculous.

You claim to be a devoted UK fan on this blog? I saw where you joined this month and the only comments you have made are in relation to two of our losses this month and derogatory of Coach… never anything good to say when we have a win.

Okay, you did not like the hire of our Coach. I can plainly see that from your comments. Truth is that Coach is not going anywhere as he is too stubborn to quit on this job. He deserves the same allotted time that any new coach hire is given.

If you don’t have the patience to hang in with the true Ky fans for the duration then I suggest you don’t come here and call for Gillispie’s firing anymore.

by kykat51 on Feb 26, 2009 4:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Amen!!

Thats all I have.. Amen!!! Im tired of all of these..“Lets fire the coach” comments.

by jager15 on Feb 27, 2009 5:19 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Gameplan

I think the offense did what it needed to for the most part. We got PP plenty of touches and shots. Unfortunately, too many of his shots were blocked. We should be eating teams alive when they have to crowd him inside. There should always be a player waiting for an open shot.

I still dont see how you couldn’t watch USC play for 2 minutes without thinking, “Porter and Slone have no business playing in this game.” Our defense should have been designed like it was for UT. Back off and make them prove they can hit contested threes consistently. I don’t believe they could hit 40%, and it would keep them out of the paint more.

It's the end of the line. I'm the firstborn. Sick of playing second fiddle. Always third in line for everything. Tired of finishing fourth. Being the fifth wheel. There are six things I'm mad about, and I'm taking over. -UK Basketball (Gob from A.D.)

by ChiroCat on Feb 26, 2009 2:38 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Credit

I am a huge sports fan and played multiple sports through my teenage years, including some high school basketball. I was one of the shorter players, so I had to bust by butt to be on the court and play steller defense. I rarely blamed my coaches for a lost, or thougt the coach was the main reason we ever one a game.

So here is my opinion, in general, in the sports world (college and pro) I feel that coaches ger way to much credit for wins and way to much credit for loses. BG can not take shots or make passes. He can not defen a player either. The players must take accountability for their play. Yes, BG needs to take accoutabiltiy for things he does, but at the same time, he can tell a player to do something, but weather they listen is out of his hands. Those who don’t listen must be punished. Any way, this was too long-winded. The point is, the coach is not the end-all-be-all of weather we win or lose, nor should the credit be that way. It is the players who play and so forth.

Lane

by Laird on Feb 26, 2009 2:38 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Exactly

Perry Stevenson turned the ball over UK’s first 2 possessions last night (threw the ball away and walked). I guess that’s BCG’s fault.

by Sharpera on Feb 26, 2009 2:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Perry

Walks early in every game. Anyone else notice that?

It's the end of the line. I'm the firstborn. Sick of playing second fiddle. Always third in line for everything. Tired of finishing fourth. Being the fifth wheel. There are six things I'm mad about, and I'm taking over. -UK Basketball (Gob from A.D.)

by ChiroCat on Feb 26, 2009 2:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

He can't get the shot fake-dribble down

He gets called every time he tries that.

by btcoop71 on Feb 26, 2009 2:46 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think

those 2 turnovers set the tone for the game. Unfortunately.

by Sharpera on Feb 26, 2009 2:58 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Cats are due for a win streak

We have had 3 streaks of 5 wins or more this season. Let’s hope it is our turn again.

It's the end of the line. I'm the firstborn. Sick of playing second fiddle. Always third in line for everything. Tired of finishing fourth. Being the fifth wheel. There are six things I'm mad about, and I'm taking over. -UK Basketball (Gob from A.D.)

by ChiroCat on Feb 26, 2009 3:24 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Sitting Meeks

Several questions here and other places on sitting Meeks in latter portion of game. Leach posed the question to Gillispie in the post-game. Gillispie’s first response was rather abrupt, a moment later he congratulated Leach for doing a good job and asking the question, saying he (Gillispie) knew it would come up. Gillispie said something to the effect that Meeks missed some defensive responsibilities and, although he usually doesn’t give up on games, this particular game was over and Meeks probably wouldn’t have made a lot of difference. As, I think, reported earlier, Gillispie stated that he asked Patterson if he wanted to come out of the game and could understand if he said yes, but he didn’t. Gillispie also brought up the concept of selfish play especially when it comes to getting Patterson the ball in good positions and times. Many underlying issues it appears.

by Wild Weasel on Feb 26, 2009 3:36 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Underlyaing Issues

there always are when a team is not performing as it should.

by Bluegilla on Feb 26, 2009 3:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Anyone Tape the Game?

I ask because, as I posted in a different thread earlier today, I noticed something that might explain why Meeks sat on the bench in the second half for as long as he did. When the Coach yanked him rather abruptly around the 13 minute mark in the second half for making a mistake, it appeared to me that, as Meeks was approaching the bench, he said something to the Coach that elicited a “WTF?” type of look and response from the Coach. When it happened, I said to my son…“well, that’s probably it for Meeks tonight” and I was pretty close to being right. If anyone taped the game, I would love for them to review the incident and see if I might be on to something.

by tooblue on Feb 26, 2009 4:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

that would be an intersting little nugget....this is the first I have heard that perspective

had I DVR’d the game, it would have been erased by now

Slower Traffic Keep Right!

by SevenRings on Feb 26, 2009 4:21 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Could be that some are correct

when they say that UK is becoming a “football school” rather than a basketball power.
That’s not all bad !!!

by Blujean on Feb 26, 2009 3:47 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Football School?

I’d rather elevate the football program than diminish the b-ball program. Just MHO.

by Bluegilla on Feb 26, 2009 4:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Ahh, that explains what happened to my last comment!

I couldn’t figure out why it didn’t post…

I like important stuff just as much as the next guy, but please, for a little while, deliver us from meaning, baseball. That's your greatest glory, and we thank you for it very, very much. -- Craig Calcaterra

by JLeverenz on Feb 26, 2009 10:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Brief thoughts.....

I only listened to maybe 5 minutes total of the first half on my way to church….basicly all i heard was SC shoots, no good, rebound, no good,rebound put back up and good. UK brings it down court and they throw it away…..to me its been the jest of the season no matter the opp. IMO its on coach as well as players.

" I believe in pipedreams"

by Magnoliacat on Feb 26, 2009 4:37 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Are some you of still trying to compare BCG with tubby? He’s new, this is his second year, he didn’t get a good recruiting stance last year…the factors weigh against him. He only has 2 players that are original UK-type material, another 2 that can be good when they want, and the rest don’t play or are inconsistent when they do. It’s too early in BCG’s coaching career at UK to determine whether he’s worthy of being our coach. But from the looks of it, we’ve got good things coming for us next year. As for this season, lets go wtih the flow, support our Cats and our coach, and make sure we stick with them besides giving up like I know numerous Louisville fan’s do whenever T Will doesn’t have a good game.

Next year will be a different story.

by jmcclellan13 on Feb 26, 2009 4:55 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

If you are really just 15 years of age

You have an amazing sense of what it takes for a new Coach to be successful at UK. Good for you and I wish some other more older people on this blog had your insight.

BTW…My very good friend growing up as a teen had the last name of McClellan…Linda. One does not see that name very often.

Stay cool!

by kykat51 on Feb 26, 2009 5:46 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That's Not True At All

First off, Gillispie recruited more than half the players on the UK roster. If most of them are not UK caliber, that’s HIS fault. The 2006 class contained a number of “UK caliber” recruits.

I don’t care when we L but I DO CARE when we give absolutely no effort for 40 straight minutes.

by FortyYearCatFan on Feb 26, 2009 7:35 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Great Post Tru

You pretty much summed it up… I hate it and I hate that our team is in the position it is in but the facts are the facts…

ShagOnSports - "people should know when they are conquered"

by ShagOnSports on Feb 26, 2009 6:28 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

AMEN

oldcat you hit the nail on the head I agree 100%

by sgray62 on Feb 26, 2009 8:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Good Points All

And BTW Larry Conley was a 5 Star player (Parade 1st team HS All-American in 1962).

He and Red Tallent were the only such players (HS All-Americans) on Rupps Runts in 1966.

by FortyYearCatFan on Feb 26, 2009 8:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Good info, but I was just pointing out that Conley wasn't a guard, but his leadership,

not his scoring, was what held that team together. Bob Tallent is a great example of a player who had exceptional offensive skills, but very limited defensive ability—a fatal flaw. Thus his relatively low playing minutes that year.

No moral victories--it's all about Ws and Ls!!!

by oldcat'69 on Feb 27, 2009 7:15 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yep

Larry Conley was an exceptional player at Ashland Blazer and then UK. He’s been an outstanding broadcaster, too.

by FortyYearCatFan on Feb 27, 2009 7:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

I like important stuff just as much as the next guy, but please, for a little while, deliver us from meaning, baseball. That's your greatest glory, and we thank you for it very, very much. -- Craig Calcaterra

by JLeverenz on Feb 26, 2009 10:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

absolutely

another rec from me…

oldcat- i’ve always enjoyed all the things you’ve written…hope to see more of you on here.

GO BIG BLUE!! GO BIG BLUE!!

by UKWildCatFanatic on Feb 26, 2009 11:26 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

add one more...

Excellent post, oldcat!

Hey, what exactly happens to the posts within the thread if they are recommended a certain number of times? Do they shoot to the top of the thread? If the magic number is 3, I guess we’ll find out. : )

by BigSkyCat on Feb 26, 2009 11:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

First time I have seen this.

The background shows a different color when the commenter gets rec’s. Oldcat is showing in pale green. I thought something was wrong my vision. Lol

Congrats Oldcat! Excellent as always.

by kykat51 on Feb 27, 2009 12:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

AJ STEWART

True whats going on with A.J. is he off the team?

by sgray62 on Feb 26, 2009 8:24 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I read that On KSR....I have no idea

that wowuld solve the potential scholly problem for next season although I would rather it come another way.

Slower Traffic Keep Right!

by SevenRings on Feb 26, 2009 8:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

He Was There Last Night

First guy out on the floor to practice his shooting.

by FortyYearCatFan on Feb 26, 2009 8:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Nobody knows.

I certainly don’t. We’ll find out soon enough.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Truzenzuzex on Feb 27, 2009 7:20 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

AJ Stewart is gone

It’s being reported on multiple sites by credible people.

GBB!!!

by OGETARTS on Feb 26, 2009 8:45 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

AND....

…… most of the same credible people are saying that there is another guy that will leave at the end of the year.

GBB!!!

by OGETARTS on Feb 26, 2009 8:48 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

What credible people? I just haven't heard that at all, even as rumors.

What’s your source? Who will leave?

Not doubting, and I like your input Ogre, but you can’t just throw that out there without any backup. That’s KSR style posting.

Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
--O.W.

by blbskue on Feb 26, 2009 9:12 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Conjecture...

…I know, but the timing is not good. I hope this is not indicative of losing control of the team. It may free up a scholarship but who would jump on board right now?

'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'

by HozeKing on Feb 26, 2009 9:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Any PG In The Nation

UK has 40 minutes of PT available at PG next year.

by FortyYearCatFan on Feb 26, 2009 10:03 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Really???

Okay, let’s try this one for size:

I am a point guard being drafted by a coach that is, at least, under scutiny, at worse, on the hot seat. I don’t know whether or not the two studs on the team will be back or not. Of the two potentially great players currently on the team, the one is a point guard who was the top recruit last year and will have a year head start on me. Oh, and there is another point guard from Texas that they already have in this year’s class. Also, why are all his players leaving anyway?

'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'

by HozeKing on Feb 26, 2009 10:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

College Don't "Draft" Players

Uk would be an attractive opportunity for any talented PG left this spring.

Gillispie runs players off. That’s his style. Right or wrong, that’s his way. Get used to it.

by FortyYearCatFan on Feb 26, 2009 10:35 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Of course you're right...sort of went on a rant....slip of the keyboard.

You’re telling a grown man to get use to it….it’s best directed toward 18 yr old high school seniors.

'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'

by HozeKing on Feb 26, 2009 10:39 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

UK Has 14 Players For 13 Scholarships With (IF) AJ Stewart Gone

So another one will leave. And if UK signs another PG recruit, yet another must go.

Gillispie runs players off. Always has, always will. It’s his style. He did so at UTEP and TAMU. He’ll do it at UK. Get used to it.

by FortyYearCatFan on Feb 26, 2009 10:03 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Here's the link at KSR

http://new.kentuckysportsradio.com/?p=14625

Wow. That sucks. I liked AJ.

Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
--O.W.

by blbskue on Feb 26, 2009 8:59 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

If this is right, I guess we don't have to worry about that scholly for next year.

Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
--O.W.

by blbskue on Feb 26, 2009 9:00 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

AJ

I like AJ and wish the best but we did solve our scholarship crunch if this is true.

DEEETROIT BASKETBALLL!!!

by davw83 on Feb 26, 2009 10:36 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Not Yet

1 more to go, maybe 2 if UK signs another recruit.

by FortyYearCatFan on Feb 26, 2009 10:39 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

1 short

We were one short. Assuming we dont sign anyone else we are set.

We lose JC
donald wiliams will lose his
if AJ’s gone that number three

If we do sign someone else though it may be an issue.

DEEETROIT BASKETBALLL!!!

by davw83 on Feb 26, 2009 11:01 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

2 Short

AJ would be 1. D Williams (if he goes off scholarship) is another 1.

He will leave UK then, because he cannot afford out-of-state tuition at UK as a walk-on.

I don’t frankly understand why UK spent a scholarship on D Williams at all.

by FortyYearCatFan on Feb 26, 2009 11:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."

by chirop1 on Feb 27, 2009 8:06 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I thought we only needed three for next year?

1. Jared Carter
2. Donald Williams
3. A.J. Stewart

Am I missing something?

by kentuckygirl0724 on Feb 27, 2009 8:41 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You are correct.

Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."

by chirop1 on Feb 27, 2009 8:57 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Nope

you are wrong

Paging Jared Carter. Dude’s a senior. Theres one
AJ stewart gone (if he is gone) Theres one
donald williams gone Theres one

Thats three. Counting is tough.

DEEETROIT BASKETBALLL!!!

by davw83 on Feb 27, 2009 9:01 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Forty not ky girl

DEEETROIT BASKETBALLL!!!

by davw83 on Feb 27, 2009 9:02 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

LOL

Good – I was SO confused at first! ;)

by kentuckygirl0724 on Feb 27, 2009 9:02 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Agree

DEEETROIT BASKETBALLL!!!

by davw83 on Feb 27, 2009 1:07 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

NCAA Tournament

ESPN’s “Bubble Watch” shows us as needing 2 out of our last three games or a win in the SEC tourney.

by kentuckygirl0724 on Feb 26, 2009 9:28 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Correction

Should say, “or winning the SEC tourney.”

by kentuckygirl0724 on Feb 26, 2009 9:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Here's the link

http://www.wkyt.com/home/headlines/40401112.html

"Learned to love the Cats at a young age, via tape delay."

by ukpastor on Feb 26, 2009 11:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

OK

this is bullcrap…….my blood is boiling………….there is no excuse for this crap. Yall I am worried now. Do yall remember I said something about team chemistry last night. This is not good not good at all.

by tenken on Feb 26, 2009 11:56 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Give Bobby Knight a shot

I ve been a Cat fan for 30+ years. Bobby Knight is certainly not my favorite individual. I saw Rick Pitino take big men that couldn’t necessarily walk and chew bubble gum and make them NBA caliber players … Nazi Mohammed, Scott Padgett, Walter McCarty come to mind. When I watched these guys play. I thought “no way” will they EVER be NBA talent, but they made it. Rick Pitino could make the most of a good situation – like recruiting at UK, and he could evaluate talent and he had a staff to develop marginal players – we have none of that now that I can see. I’m sorry Rick P. is at Louis"whatchemacallit". If he had stayed at UK – lord only knows how many banners would be hanging in the sacred Rupp Rafters today. So is the vein of my Bobby Knight talk …. Do I like what the man stands for? not really. Like what the man’s potential is? You bet! I think he would jump at the chance to play IU every year and renew a rivalry that has dimmed. Cat Fans … want to erase the BCG hangover ? (by the way – I haven’t drank the Kool Aid yet) … want to see that eighth banner hangin in the Rupp rafters? Come on Bobby, give us your sanctimonius crap, your sarcasm, your Holier than thou attitude … but hey man, while your at it how ‘bout that eighth banner? You guys want to try to coach against him with BCG (I typed that with a straight face)? or are you ready for a little "if you can’t beat ’um join ’um"?? How bad do you want to see another banner in Rupp? Who Ya Gonna Call?

by ukcris on Feb 27, 2009 1:11 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

I don't agree w/ firing Gillispie and/or hiring Bob Knight at all

I posted this in your other post as well….

Hypothetically, If people think that Gillispie is unwavering in his system, wait until they get a load of Bob Knight. If UK fans think that top recruits are avoiding UK because of Gillispie, wait until they get Bob Knight. No top recruit in their right mind would come and play for Coach Knight now. I am not dissing the guy. I loved Indiana when he was there, as long as they weren’t playing UK. But modern 4 and 5 star players don’t want to deal with a system oriented team, they want a system built around them to make them more marketable for the next level. If people think Gillispie is stubborn and rude… wait until they get the General, who in an aside, didn’t win anything after 87’ with Indiana. His records post that Championship were similar to many of Tubby’s records (post championship) and Gillispie records. Firing Coach G. for Bob Knight would be at best a lateral move and at worst a giant mistake… replacing a young coach w/ potential for one who peaked years ago and one who would at best be in it for another 3 years or so.

I need a Sea of Blue because I am surrounded by Tennessee orange!

by sleepytimetea on Feb 27, 2009 1:45 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Good points … guess I’m just frustrated with what we have for coaching right now … seems like we are not functioning as a team – we had a “blow-up” in the locker room after the Mississippi game (I think) and we all thought the team was on the right track – then the Carolina game comes along. Maybe it’s just the “chemistry” of this team – but we really only lose Jared after this year and though there is some promising talent on the horizon – I find it hard to see where we will be better. And I really feel like if this team were close to achieving something great, PPat and JM would come back try to make that happen – but I see them as running from a bad situation. I still hold out hope that they will return next year. Still a fan – just a frustrated one – GO CATS!!

by ukcris on Feb 27, 2009 7:04 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Neither Padgett Nor Mohammed Was NBA Caliber When Pitino Left In 1997

Though he certainly made them better players. Nazr improved GREATLY and made All-SEC in 1998. Padgett improved GREATLY and made Wooden A-A in 1998 and All-SEC in 1999.

Pitino has come nowhere close to NCAA title since he left UK in 1997. I’m not sure UK would even have a 7th banner hanging if he had stayed. His recruiting had started to suffer at UK in 1996 and 1997.

by FortyYearCatFan on Feb 27, 2009 6:41 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I guess you forgot

UL was in the final four in 2005. I think that’s pretty close to winning an NCAA title, don’t you think?

My question is – what does this talk about “when Pitino left and Tubby took over” have to do with UK’s current situation? It does not relate to UK’s current situation at all.

by Sharpera on Feb 27, 2009 7:03 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Pitino Has Been Nowhere Close To A Title Since 1997

I’ll stand by that, regardless of FF in 2005.

You said Pitino made Nazr and Padgett into NBA players. He did not. He made them better but his successor made them into NBA players. Their numbers improved GREATLY when Pitino left.

by FortyYearCatFan on Feb 27, 2009 7:07 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Again

What does that have to with UK’s current situation?

And by the way, I did not say Pitino made Nazi and Padgett into NBA players. Of course their numbers got better after Pitino left, they matured. Isn’t Jodie Meeks numbers better now than they were when he was Freshman? You still haven’t answered that question.

And you are crazy to say Pitino has been no where close to a title since he left UK. UL made the final four in 2005, that’s about as close as you can get to winning an NCAA championship.

by Sharpera on Feb 27, 2009 7:14 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The Poster To Whom I Replied Said That

So I offered my opinion in reply.

Almost every UK player has better numbers as junior and senior. Meeks included.

Pitino has been nowhere close to NCAA title since UK. He is nowhere near the coach he was in the mid 1990’s and here’s why.

Billy Donovan was his chief recruiter in the early 1990’s. Jim O’Brien was his bench coach in the mid 1990’s. Absent them, he is 10% points lower in W-L record than he was at UK.

by FortyYearCatFan on Feb 27, 2009 7:18 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I’ll stand by (Pitino being nowhere close to a title since 1997), regardless of FF in 2005.

Exactly….I was just telling my wife the other day that the sun rises in the west and the grass is blue.

'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'

by HozeKing on Feb 27, 2009 7:48 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Gotta Disagree

Making the Final Four is getting pretty damn close to winning a championship.

by kentuckygirl0724 on Feb 27, 2009 8:47 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Reading Between Lines

Tru, your proficiency in reading between the lines is in doubt. This kind of oblique OTS-defense by Forty is just the kind of propaganda you proscribed previously. If permitted you can expect an appropriate response.

by Wild Weasel on Feb 27, 2009 10:46 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry, I Don't Worship Pitino

He did many great things at UK. No need to credit him for things someone else did.

by FortyYearCatFan on Feb 27, 2009 11:27 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That comment ....

… is not very precise, and is baiting.

Pitino did do some of it, and to what degree is infinitely and fruitlessly debatable.

Do not bait your fellow posters.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Truzenzuzex on Feb 27, 2009 11:32 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I Didn't Intend That

Pitino deserves full credit for his many accomplishments in the 1990’s.

But I don’t give him Extra Credit (or blame) for things that took place after he left.

by FortyYearCatFan on Feb 27, 2009 11:35 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

And Let Me Re-Emphasize My Point

Pitino in the 1990’s was only exceeded by Rupp in the 1940’s at UK.

What we did was remarkable. Lightning in bottle, maybe. Hasn’t been the same since but still very good.

NBA players galore at UK. Just a handful at Louisville. (For example)

by FortyYearCatFan on Feb 27, 2009 11:33 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

An appropriate response is always permitted.

Forty made fair points. Neither Mohammed nor Padget were considered NBA prospects when Pitino left. That is a fact. He did not suggest that Pitino could not have coached them up had he stayed. Furthermore, his comment defends his over-arching point that Pitino has not done as well at U of L as he did in other places, even if his premise that Pitino has not been close to a national championship since he left UK looks flawed to me.

There is nothing here to respond to with respect to Tubby Smith, and facts are most certainly not propaganda. The only thing in doubt, in my mind at least, is your goodwill toward your fellow-member. You may argue that Pitino was more responsible for their eventual lofty status if you must, but that argument, in my opinion, is not really defensible.

But you may not attack Smith out of a desire to balance every indirect implication of success by Smith with evidence of some kind of perceived failure. The argument in question is about Pitino, and what he did or did not do. Stick to that, and you may respond as you please.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Truzenzuzex on Feb 27, 2009 11:30 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Beg To Differ

I’m not so obtuse as to not recognize this for what it is:

He made them better but his successor made them into NBA players.

by Wild Weasel on Feb 27, 2009 12:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Indeed That's A Fact

They were not NBA players in 1997.

They became NBA players in 1998 and 1999.

by FortyYearCatFan on Feb 27, 2009 12:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

What is it?

Seriously. It looks like a fact to me. Why would that offend anybody?

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Truzenzuzex on Feb 27, 2009 3:26 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Same Thing With Reggie Hanson Or Joe Crawford

He played 2 years for Eddie Sutton and 2 for Pitino.

Sutton made him better but Pitino made him into NBA player. He didn’t play much but he did make the NBA for a short while in the 1990’s.

Joe Crawford got better every year at UK but Gillispie honed him into NBA draft pick in 2008. He would not have been that in 2007.

by FortyYearCatFan on Feb 27, 2009 3:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Not A Fact

It’s an opinion. I could just as easily state with some historic vindication that had Pitino stayed Padget and Mohammed’s status as prospestive NBA players would have been enhanced by his coaching, ergo their potential was lessened due to his absence.

by Wild Weasel on Feb 27, 2009 4:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

True BUT

Louisville players have seen very little NBA enhancement the past 8 years. Still just 2 Cards to the NBA this decade, I think.

by FortyYearCatFan on Feb 27, 2009 4:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

05

That UofL team in 05 got to the final four but no way where they good enough to win a title that year.

DEEETROIT BASKETBALLL!!!

by davw83 on Feb 27, 2009 9:04 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Does not matter how good they were...

Reaching the final four is close to winning a title. How good they were is irrelevant.

by Sharpera on Feb 27, 2009 9:05 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Disagree

Reaching a final four isnt close to winning at title.

It’s 2/3 of the way there.
Final four teams still have to win two more games.

DEEETROIT BASKETBALLL!!!

by davw83 on Feb 27, 2009 9:33 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That's your opinion

But you are 2 games from a title, compared to 60 other teams that didn’t make it that far.

I guess all those times UK made the final 4 but did not win the title – UK was not close to winning it all.

Why do you think UK hangs final 4 appearance banners in Rupp? Because they were close to winning a title.

by Sharpera on Feb 27, 2009 9:52 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Depends on the team

That UofL team in 05 was not going to win a title. I didnt think they had what it took. They overachieved from a four seed to get to the final four. My original point was really just argueing that IMO they werent a title worthy team ans wouldnt have won it regrardless.

Yeah all those times that UK was a final four team and didnt make it to the final game they werent close to winning it all. The final four is a marketing idea. You all are argueing about who gets to place fourth. In the words of TIger Woods “Second place sucks”. I can imagine about how he would feel for third or fourth place.

Can anyone say the UCLA has been close to winning a title the last several years when none of their teams have gotten out of the semifinals?

DEEETROIT BASKETBALLL!!!

by davw83 on Feb 27, 2009 10:20 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

UCLA was

closer to a championship than the other 180 teams in the tourney 3 years in a row. That’s quite an accomplishment.

It does not matter if that UL team was good or not good enough to win a championship or that 2nd place sucks or that the final 4 is a marketing idea. Those points are irrelevant. The UL/UCLA teams you speak of above advanced farther in the tourney than 60 other teams in their respective tournaments. And both were 2 wins away from a championship each time. That’s a fact.

We’ll just have agree to disagree on this issue.

by Sharpera on Feb 27, 2009 10:42 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Advanced

So they advanced farther in the tournament than 60 other teams. That still doesnt get you close to winning a national championship. You still have to win two more games, which is a third of the portion of the tourney.

That’s like saying you won the first two thirds of you conference schedule and another team went 16-0 while you went 12-4 and saying you were close to being conference champion.

DEEETROIT BASKETBALLL!!!

by davw83 on Feb 27, 2009 11:22 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Maths off

My maths totally off but you get my point.

DEEETROIT BASKETBALLL!!!

by davw83 on Feb 27, 2009 11:23 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You math

is not the only thing totally off – so is your argument. haha

by Sharpera on Feb 27, 2009 11:34 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That was mean

DEEETROIT BASKETBALLL!!!

by davw83 on Feb 27, 2009 1:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

"They overachieved from a four seed to get to the final four."

I think you are arguing against your own point…wouldn’t that be to the coach’s credit??

'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'

by HozeKing on Feb 27, 2009 11:57 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Not denigrating Pitino or the 05 team

Im not denigrating Pitino or the 05 team at all.

My point is two fold

1) College basketball’s obsession with the “road to the final four” has warped perception of success. Not even reaching the national finals is NOT almost winning a championship. Placing fourth is not almost winning a championship. I dont care how many banners are hanging in Rupp if you didnt make the final game you didnt almost win a championship. Thats like saying that the AFC runner up almost won the superbowl. Thats rediculous.

2) I dont believe the 05 UofL team was capable of winning the championship. They were a good team and Pitino did a good job with them but the run to the final four was a surprise. Im not putting them down at all just dont think they “almost won a national championship”.

DEEETROIT BASKETBALLL!!!

by davw83 on Feb 27, 2009 1:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't get it.

I guess you have to play in the Championship game and lose on a last second shot to be considered to have ‘almost won a national championship’. So, in your mind, what does it take?

'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'

by HozeKing on Mar 1, 2009 12:34 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

More Than Pitino Has Done Since 1997

when he last “almost” won the NCAA title.

by FortyYearCatFan on Mar 1, 2009 8:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I dont disagree with that

But I’m saying that getting to the Final Four put them closer to the Championship than those thad were eliminated earlier. Doesnt matter if they would have won or not – point is they got close to having a chance at it.

by kentuckygirl0724 on Feb 27, 2009 9:06 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Was "Nazi" Mohammed a German?

C! A! T! S! CATS! CATS! CATS!

by NYCCats on Feb 27, 2009 8:50 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

But what does that...

have to do with UK’s current situation? Who cares about Pitino? He hasn’t been at UK in over a decade.

Bottom line is BCG needs time to get “his” players in the program. We are 19-9 and 8-5 in the SEC. We still have a shot to win the SEC East. And UK doesn’t even have a true PG on this team. If you would have told me before the season started we would be 19-9 and 8-5 in the SEC at this point with a shot at winning the SEC East I would have been happy. With UK’s current roster, I didn’t expect to win the SEC East this year.

Yeah we played bad the other night, but so what? A bad loss does not define a season. Get over it.

by Sharpera on Feb 27, 2009 7:29 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

He Deserves 5 Years

Any coach does.

Pitino was 150-43 with 0 SEC titles, 1 FF, and 0 NCAA titles in HIS first 6 years. Good, but not great.

by FortyYearCatFan on Feb 27, 2009 11:29 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

UK won the SEC tourney

1992-1995 in Pitino’s 1st 6 years at UK. That’s 4 SEC tourney titles in a row. That’s not great?? I completely disagree with that assessment.

Also don’t forget UK was not eligible to play in the SEC tourney his first 2 years because if probation.

by Sharpera on Feb 27, 2009 11:40 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

To Each His Or Her Own

I don’t attach much significance to SECT championships. Rupp won so mant that SEC cancelled the tourney in early 1950’s (for over 25 years).

UK had a good team in 1991 and would have won SEC title (if eligible).

Good, not great. (1990-95) 150-43, 11-4 in NCAA.

OUTSTANDING! (1996 & 97) 69-7, 11-1 in NCAA.

by FortyYearCatFan on Feb 27, 2009 11:49 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Generally agree, Forty, but with one UK exception:

Sutton. Didn’t deserve five, for sure.

No moral victories--it's all about Ws and Ls!!!

by oldcat'69 on Feb 27, 2009 7:46 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yep

He cheated from the start and had the drinking problems right away, too.

Sutton deserved what he got.

by FortyYearCatFan on Feb 27, 2009 7:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Lots Of Bad L The Past Few Years

Especially the last 2 years. 8 home L in 2 years – long time since UK experienced that many in 2 years.

by FortyYearCatFan on Feb 27, 2009 11:30 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That happens to

teams in down period. UK is not immune to this. Just ask UCLA and UNC – they both had losing seasons this decade. UCLA had 2 losing season this decade I believe.

by Sharpera on Feb 27, 2009 11:42 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Certainly True

But the past few years (at UK) are generally better than UNC or UCLA struggles early in the 2K’s.

by FortyYearCatFan on Feb 27, 2009 11:51 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Hey?!?!?!? :(

'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'

by HozeKing on Feb 27, 2009 8:54 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

No worries, Hoze....

No one can take your place ;)

by kentuckygirl0724 on Feb 27, 2009 9:01 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Lol...that is so true.

Especially with that dang cardinal looking at me in the face all the time :-)

Well…it is our state bird folks and I love seeing them in my backyard.

by kykat51 on Feb 27, 2009 4:11 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

An exciting community-driven SBNation blog, by and for fans of the Kentucky Wildcats.

Community Guidelines
[UPDATED 3/31/2009]
Start posting about the Wildcats »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Harold-the-dog_small
We look into our crystal balls
128_small
2009 SEC Football Schedule
Miners__2__small
Inconsistency plagues Kentucky football
Iconator_2f99b654c1a51345314f8a8458af10e5_small
Best Programs 2000-2009
Small
Excuses and Analysis of The Campbellsville Game
Small
I need tickets for Friday
Photo_small
Gillespie changes plea
128_small
Pure Defensive and Offensive Efficiency
Small
Tipton Mans Up To Another Error
Uk_logo_blue_small
A Long Hard Look Ahead....

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Twitter Widget -- Follow me!


Managing Editor

Tru_small Truzenzuzex

Editor

Small Ken Howlett

Author

Diane-black_heels_small BigSkyCat

Official Partner of CBS Sports