Q&A with Razorback Expats.
Once again, Steven with Razorback Expats, an outstanding Arkansas Razorback blog, asked me to do a Q & A with them for the Arkansas game, which I gratefully accepted. The following are his answers to my questions, with my questions in italics.
You can find my answers to Steven's questions by following this link.
- John Pelphrey has been on the job for one and one half seasons now, with some big triumphs and some big disappointments. Have your feelings about him changed since he was selected as coach? If so, how?
Our feelings haven't really changed. My fellow expat John and I were enthusiastic about the hire and remain so. Throughout all of the ups and downs of this season, this team has continued to play hard (well, except for the closing minutes of our home loss to Auburn, when the guys did seem to give up). That speaks well of Pelphrey. And even though it severely decreases what small chance we had of beating you guys, I admire the coach for suspending Fortson. He is very demanding of his players, and I like that.
Having said all of that, it's all about recruiting. This year's class is, overall, something of a disappointment, at least so far. Whether Pelphrey can bring in the kind of talent needed to revitalize the program remains to be seen. My gut says he can and will. - Even with Pelphrey's pressure scheme and quick guards, Arkansas is not very proficient at turning over the opponent. Why do you think that is so?
I don't know that I have an answer more sophisticated than the following: They're just not very a very good defensive team. In Nolan's heyday, the team always had at least one or two defensive standouts: Corey Beck, Clint McDaniel, Arlyn Bowers, Keith Wilson. Even in a half-court set-up, those guys could lock their opponents up. Put them in a style of play that pushed the opponent beyond the brink of exhaustion, and they became even more effective.
Those kind of guys just aren't on this year's team. Marcus Britt, a sophomore blue-collar guard, may yet become that kind of player, but he doesn't receive a ton of playing time yet.
On top of the lack of top-level defensive skill, the team doesn't have enough warm bodies to press for very long. In the Hogs' two most recent games, both on the road, they played at a fast pace in the first half and had sizable leads at intermission. In the second half, their legs looked like Jello, and they ended up losing by significant margins. - What is the biggest strength of this year's Razorbacks? Biggest weakness?
Strengths: forward Michael Washington and point guard Courtney Fortson, the latter of whom you won't have to worry about on Saturday. Also, attitude. As I said earlier, they've continued to bust their butts even during this seemingly interminable slide.
Weaknesses: How much time do you have? The Hogs are terrible at guarding the three-pointer, probably in part because we are so small in the backcourt. We don't have any depth in the frontcourt: Michael Washington is our sole consistent source of offense upfront (Jason Henry is listed as a forward and has performed well recently, but he really plays more like a guard).
In fact, we don't any depth overall. With Fortson suspended and Marcus Monk being withheld due to "eligibility issues" (that's all the university has said about the matter), the Hogs will have only eight scholarship players available on Saturday, one of whom - Jason Henry - has a cranky knee that limited his minutes and effectiveness Wednesday against Auburn. - Describe your perception of how Arkansas fans perceive the Kentucky Wildcats basketball team.
I think Kentucky is viewed as a friendly rival. Arkansas fans have very warm memories of those classic early and mid-1990s games and would like nothing more than for the program to get back to the point where we are a consistent threat to you guys. - What has happened to the Razorbacks in league play? They were doing fantastic against OOC competition, knocking off two highly ranked teams, but have crashed in league play. Why do you think that is?
Looking back to the victories over Oklahoma and Texas (which growing more stunning with each passing hour), I think the Hogs just caught lightning in a bottle, in part because they were playing in front of the most raucous home crowds of at least the past 10 years. What those victories made a lot of people forget (including, I have to say, myself) was that the Hogs struggled to beat many of their mid-major non-conference opponents.
The team you see in conference play is, unfortunately, a pretty accurate representation of who the Hogs are. They play very hard, and there's enough there with Washington and Fortson to perhaps notch some unexpected victories down the stretch. But I don't think there's enough there to win consistently in the SEC.
Our thanks to Steven and John for asking us to participate in the Q&A. We hope for a good battle tomorrow in Bud Walton Arena, and may both teams give their all.
0 recs |
19 comments
|
Comments
Pell
From the outside looking in I really like the job Pell is doing at Ark. I am very surprised they havent been very competitive in conference play. I thought that they werent as good as the two high profile wins suggested but certainly expected them to do better than they have. I really like the group of players that Pell has brought in, probably because Billy G recruited most of them as well, I just that they are an extremely young team this season. Courtney has been better than advertised when he has been on and I expect Clark to have a good career on the offensive side of the ball when he adjust to the game even if he is somewhat of a defensive liability. If they can give Pelphrey two more seasons without setting upon him I think he can right the ship there and become a contender in the conference.
DEEETROIT BASKETBALLL!!!
by davw83 on Feb 13, 2009 1:20 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Ah, Youth. Alas, Youth.
"Mistakes are the usual bridge between inexperience and wisdom."
A quote from Phyllis Theroux who knows something about youthful mistakes.
Arkansas — and UK to a lesser extent — is the SEC in microcosm, i.e. a congregation in transition. As such it is subject to the many mistakes associated with youth and it’s not limited to on-the-court actions — although they’re the most visible — but also in the classroom and in social interactions. UK, to this point it appears, has been invulnerable to off-court youthful indiscretions but we’re quite familiar with the Liggins situation which is quite typical of deficiency in wisdom/experience. Which brings to my mind the question: How would Pelphrey have handled Liggins youthful intransigence? If past history be a guide one would say, with more severity, but perhaps Liggins is a special case. As for Hogs’ freshmen: Fortson has exceeded expectations, Clark is about where expected for an athletically challenged, stand still, spot up shooter, and Sanchez a bit of a disappointment but front court players take more time. Nice to read that Hogs’ fans for the most part are patient. I like Pelphrey and wish him well (except versus Cats of course) but must admit I’m pleased that his current problems have temporarily stopped the incessant comments on he and Travis Ford being better options for UK. I expect a very competitive game and am reluctant to be optimistic.
by Wild Weasel on Feb 13, 2009 2:03 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Good Q&A
I always like hearing rational bloggers from other schools. I really believe UK is due for a romp tomorrow against Arkansas. All the pieces seem to be there for UK to have a great game. The only things that are in Ark’s favor are the home court, PPat’s status and if they get real hot from the 3 point line. They are missing key players and UK may have turned a corner with a gutsy win against UF.
Go Blue!
Slower Traffic Keep Right!
by SevenRings on Feb 13, 2009 3:21 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Oh my
I really believe UK is due for a romp tomorrow against Arkansas
I get really nervous anytime I hear someone say that! ;-)
...when you let other people tell you what success is, you already have no chance of ever finding it. - Doug Glanville
by JLeverenz on Feb 13, 2009 3:56 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
LOL....this is one of the few times in the last few years I have said that
I am still a skeptic at heart.
Slower Traffic Keep Right!
by SevenRings on Feb 13, 2009 4:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
"Friendly Rival" sounds right to me
I too would like Arkansas to return to those halcyon days of the mid-90’s, especially now that Pelphrey is coaching them up.
...when you let other people tell you what success is, you already have no chance of ever finding it. - Doug Glanville
by JLeverenz on Feb 13, 2009 3:57 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
West Virginia over #13 Villanova 93-72
43 points for Da’Shaun Butler.
At home for WVU, after struggling. Kind of a repeat from last night’s UofL/ND debacle. . .
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
--O.W.
by blbskue on Feb 13, 2009 11:13 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Both WVU And K-St Are Having Good Seasons
Those are 2 of UK’s best W this season.
by FortyYearCatFan on Feb 14, 2009 7:46 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Big East
Nova was the flavor of the week for the ESPN guru’s who fall over themselves talking about how good that conference is. (Remember Dickie V’s comments a couple weeks ago about the best SEC teams would finish 8th,9th or lower in the Big East.) And I’m sure Digger and the boys will be touting Notre Dame as deserving of a NCAA bid because of their thrashing of the Cards the other night. Granted,UConn may be the real deal and Pitt and Lousiville can be very good but after that,I would take our chances with the likes of Nova,Providence,Syracuse and Cinn.
by maysvilleblue on Feb 14, 2009 9:22 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah ...
… I think there are several teams in the SEC that could beat any of the Big East teams outside the top three or four. I do think that in the top five or six, the Big East is quite a bit better, than the top four of the SEC, but once you get past the really great teams, I believe the SEC could do OK.
That’s just a gut opinion. Statistically, I don’t think I can make that argument stick.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Feb 14, 2009 10:42 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Well who wouldn't want to watch Depaul v. Georgia game?
I don’t even want to think about it.
I guess I follow what you are saying but I’m not sure what it really means. If you are saying that a team like USC could beat Syracuse, as an example, yea I guess that is true. But I am sure Syracuse would win 7 out of 10…but that’s just my opinion.
'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'
by HozeKing on Feb 14, 2009 10:51 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I doubt they'd win that many.
But Syracuse would probably win six out of ten. South Carolina is better than you think, maybe even better than UK is this year. And Mississippi State would give any team in the Big East fits due to matchup problems, if they are at the top of their game.
But I don’t dispute the general conclusion you make — I think the Big East teams are generally better this year, and I know the stats support that conclusion. I just don’t think that difference (except in the top 3) is as big as the ESPN’s of the world would have us all believe. I suppose that was the point I was trying to make.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Feb 14, 2009 10:59 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
If you are suggesting Varnado would present matchup problems...
…I think Thabeet could easily counter that beast. Oh, and Samuels….not.
'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'
by HozeKing on Feb 14, 2009 11:02 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah.
No doubt Thabeet is better, although as a pure shot-blocker, I don’t think he is. Maybe those two teams will get to play in the tourney. That would be a treat.
But I was talking more about their guards — they are ridiculously difficult to match up with, and they can just kill you from the perimeter.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Feb 14, 2009 11:04 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Debacle? DEBACLE??
What do you mean…debacle?
It wasn’t a debacle!! It wasn’t close to a debacle…it was worse. It was a nightmare….a tumultuous butt kicking….an embarrassing display of basketball….it made you want to punch a baby.
'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'
by HozeKing on Feb 14, 2009 10:47 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I Rarely Cheer For Notre Dame
The U of L game is that rare exception.
by FortyYearCatFan on Feb 14, 2009 10:54 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for sharing.
I feel honored…somehow.
'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'
by HozeKing on Feb 14, 2009 10:56 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Notre Dame played ...
… about as well as they are capable of playing. Louisville simply didn’t respond. It happens. It’s quite possible ND could have handled even UConn on the roll they were on.
When ND shoots like that from the perimeter, it just takes all the wind out of your sails. It reminded me very much of the UK/MSU game. That game was closer, but it was just as frustrating. U of L could have been closer, but they surrendered half way through the second half.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Feb 14, 2009 11:02 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 














