UK Basketball: Grading the 'Cats
With the "soft" portion of the Kentucky schedule now in the rear-view mirror, and dates with No. 10 North Carolina, No. 14 Connecticut, No. 20 Louisville, and Indiana looming large in Big Blue's headlights, it's time to cast a critical eye toward the progress of this youthful edition of the 'Cats. We've all heard and read John Calipari plead for patience with this group ... don't expect too much, too soon, has been his oft-heard mantra. And while I certainly agree this team is an unfinished work of art, following closely the evolution of Cal's (would be) masterpiece is too tempting to toss aside.
For the particulars, follow me after the jump:
The Good-to-Excellent
Overall team shooting -- The 'Cats are currently shooting the ball at an exceptional 51.5% rate of accuracy, good for 10th in the nation. Leading the way by shooting 69.1%, is junior forward Patrick Patterson. Patterson has made 47 of 68 shots, as well as making 38.5%% of this trey attempts (5-13). Patterson's post teammate, freshman DeMarcus Cousins, is shooting 55.8% from the floor (43-77). Freshman guard John Wall has made 55.6% of his shots from the floor (35-63), and big man Daniel Orton at 50.0% (11-22) rounds out the four 50.0%+ shooters (with at least 20 shots taken) UK currently boasts. Close behind that quartet is Darnell Dodson, who's made 15-31 from the field, good for 48.4%. For those concerned with points-per-possession; UK is averaging 1.16, good for 17th in the nation.
Considering two of the 'Cats' primary scoring threats can be found down on the blocks (Patterson, Cousins), one can reasonably expect the teams shooting percentage to remain hovering around the 50.0% mark for most of the year. And so far, the shot selection of the UK guards has been solid, if not spectacular, and shot selection, i.e. taking good shots, is the key to shooting a high percentage. Even though UK's competition ramps up considerably in the coming weeks, if Wall, Dodson, Eric Bledsoe (44.4%), and Darius Miller (40.0%) continue to be selective, and take shots via the offensive game-plan, as well as continue to score easy fast-break baskets, the 'Cats' shooting should continue to be checked off as a positive in the season's ledger.
Coming into the season, the guards' overall shooting was a major concern for most UK fans, ergo, I have to award a well-earned A in this category.
Three-point shooting -- If there was a bigger concern than the overall shooting of UK's freshmen and sophomore guards, it was their potential three-point shooting numbers that most kept UK fans up at night wondering where their Jodie Meeks had gone. Well, as of yet, the troubled minds of the BBN seems to have been fraught with angst for no good reason: With no less than three shooters (taking a minimum of 20 threes) making at least 40.0% of their trey tries (Bledsoe - 52.2%, Dodson - 40.0%, Miller - 40.0%), UK is sporting a very respectable 37.9% three-point shooting percentage. Also getting into the act, as promised, is Patrick Patterson. The big fella is showin' the NBA he has mad range, making five of 13 threes (38.5%) so far this season.
Although it's not yet time to exhale, the perimeter shooting of this group has been a major surprise, especially considering the person thought to be UK's best outside shooter (Dodson) has missed three games. A 37.9% make rate on threes earns this category a solid A.
Offensive rebounding -- Kentucky's big man combination of Patterson (31), Cousins (28), and Orton (10) have combined to grab 69 offensive rebounds in only seven games (a cumulative 9.9 per game). As a team, UK has snagged 21 more offensive boards than their opponents, a welcome change from the numbers we've witnessed over the last few years.
UK's offensive rebound percentage is ranked fourth nationally at 45.9%, but before we throw the boys on the blocks a way-to-go party, keep in mind these numbers were accumulated against inferior, and many times, much smaller front lines than UK will encounter in the coming months. But, as long as they continue to crash the offensive boards aggressively, I feel confident this group will continue to snag more than their share of offensive rebounds.
Fourth nationally ... it doesn't get much better than that. Once again, an A is in order.
Overall rebounding -- As expected, UK is averaging a +12.4 in overall rebounding. With Patterson (10.6), Cousins (8.6 in an average of 20.0 minutes per game), Ramon Harris (4.1 in an average of 16.7 mpg), and Orton (3.3 in an average of 14.7 mpg) crashing the boards with abandon, Kentucky's domination of the glass has been thorough.
As is true with most of the early-season statistics, UK's overall rebounding will be put to a sterner test beginning with Saturday's game against North Carolina. But, posting a +12.4 at any point in the season is certainly commendable, and deserving of another A.
Shot block differential -- Kentucky's big men have blocked a total of 58 shots (8.3 per game), good for first nationally. DeMarcus Cousins (18) and Daniel Orton (12) have led the Big Blue block party to this point in the year. Kentucky's opponents, on the other hand, have blocked only 18 shots (2.6 per game), for an excellent +5.7 differential.
Shot blocking was thought to be a positive for this year's team, and they have not disappointed. Why break the streak ... another A for UK's block monsters.
Overall opponents' field goal shooting -- UK is adeptly holding their opponents to only 36.6% floor shooting, which is good for 20th in the nation. As is true with many of the above categories, this number can be traced back to the level of competition UK has faced thus far, coupled with the effectiveness at guarding the basket UK's big men have displayed to this point in the season.
While I expect the current 36.6% number to rise slightly, a realistic goal of this group should be to hold opponents to sub-40.0% shooting on the season. A solid B+ is much deserved.
Team chemistry -- There are no stats to dissect, no numbers to crunch (except 7-0), but this team seems to like one another. I'm not at practice, but from all reports, the team members' desire to win trumps their desire to put up individual numbers.
This area was a slight concern coming into the season, so a feeling of relief results in a very well-deserved A+.
The Average-to-Below-Average
Turnover differential -- Kentucky is averaging 17.1 turnovers per game, while their opponents are averaging only 14.9 turnovers per game. These numbers are a function of UK's youth, and the fact that the team hasn't displayed the defensive tenacity often related to a John Calipari-coached team. The two primary ball-handlers for the 'Cats, John Wall (4.0 per game) and Eric Bledsoe (4.3 pg), have combined to commit 54 turnovers, which, considering their freshman status and pace of play, aren't terrible numbers, but there is certainly room for improvement, which should come as the players become more experienced and accustomed to the offensive sets.
Considering the 'Cats are going to run with the ball if given the opportunity, somewhere near 14-15 turnovers per game is an acceptable average. And as the team learns and executes Calipari's defensive desires, UK's forced turnovers, otherwise known as steals (currently averaging 7.0 per game), should also increase. But at the moment, the best I can award is a tepid C-.
Free throw shooting -- As a team UK is shooting a mediocre 66.8% from the charity stripe. Only John Wall (80.4%), Eric Bledsoe (88.2%), and Darius Miller (88.9%) are shooting the rock with aplomb from the free throw line.
The Scooby Doo crew is needed to unravel the mystery of Patrick Patterson's sudden shakiness from the line -- Coming into this season, Patterson was 216-287 for his career (75.3%), but this year he's making his free tries at only a 51.7% rate (15-29). Considering Patterson will take upward of 150 free throws on the year, with many of those coming at critical junctures, solving the Patterson free throw puzzle must be done, and soon.
It was heartening to see DeMarcus Cousins make eight of 11 free throws against UNC-Asheville Monday night in Freedom Hall, after he made only 18-36 (50.0%) up to that point in the season. Practice produces confidence, DeMarcus. Thanks for demonstrating that fact live, and in color.
On the plus side of the season ledger is the fact that UK's primary ball-handlers are all shooting their free throws at an excellent rate -- Wall, Bledsoe, and Miller are a combined 60-74 (81.1%).
Calipari's teams have often been plagued by poor free throw shooting, and it cost him a national title two years ago. This season Cal, has at times, made light of the poor free throw shooting this team has demonstrated, but no one will be laughing if their under-performance begins to cost the 'Cats victories. A shaky C- is all that is deserved at this point in the season for UK's (mostly) shaky free throw shooting.
Opponents three-point shooting -- UK ranks 218th in the nation in defending their opponents' three-point shooting, which stands at 35.7%. The horror show looks like this -- Miami - 57.7%, Sam Houston State - 47.4%, Stanford - 35.0%, UNC-Asheville - 40.0%.
Unacceptable ... there really isn't anything else one can say. Sure, UK is young, but youth is not an excuse for failing to get a hand in the shooter's face, or denying the shooter the ball. But, the team will learn defensive rotation in time, as well as the effort it takes to defend competently. Or at least they better, because we all know the three-point shot is the great equalizer. Grade? A well deserved F.
Early December Exam Results
Through seven games this team is showing why so many thought so highly of UK's chances of having a great season. Sure, they've had a couple of close shaves (Miami, Stanford), but with youth comes inexperience, i.e. taking opponents lightly, but as the season progresses, if they mature at an acceptable rate, this team should be very tough to beat regardless of the level of competition.
Freshman summation -- John Wall has been spectacular, if at times a bit too comfortable dribbling the ball; Eric Bledsoe has shown he CAN shoot the ball beyond 15 feet; DeMarcus Cousins is simply ferocious, if a bit too emotional; Darnell Dodson, if he can demonstrate a willingness to play defense, has the chance to be special at the two/three-spot; Daniel Orton has been a solid edtion to the low post with his solid shooting, and timely rebounding (10 offensive boards in only 14.7 mpg); Jon Hood hasn't played enough to render any meaningful words ( four games, 8.5 mpg), except ... I hope the Madisonville native gets a chance to shine.
As the team embarks on the rest of the season, the competition increases exponentially. Losses may be in the offing, but as they continue to learn the system, and learn each other, I expect mostly victories, with a chance for greatness.
Thanks for reading, and Go 'Cats!
63 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think
an F for the 3 point defense is a little harsh. I have watched all of the games and there is no way to stop a team from taking 3 point shots. A couple of these teams have just been on fire against UK, hitting threes even with a hand in the face. With that said, UNC seems to be finding its three point game just in time for Saturday. We will not deny a good passing team open threes. We just have to counter with good perimeter shooting of our own. I will also predict that Cousins will not see many minutes in the UNC game due to foul trouble. We will need some meaningful minutes from Harrellson off the bench and hope that Orton can stay out of foul trouble. Patterson needs to have a huge game.
Their ball denial has been abysmal, which is why the three-point shooting % is so high.
But, they’ll learn.
almost the same thing as ball denial,
but off the ball defense is weak – they stand up when the player they are guarding does not have the ball so that when the player they are guarding gets the ball it takes a split second too long to get in the defensive position. wall is quick enough to get a way with it and maybe if they watch ramon enough they will learn…
only one rule in my house - uk has to be your favorite college bball team
by memphis wildcat on Dec 2, 2009 9:35 PM EST up reply actions
Because of your analysis,
I don’t have to watch UK basketball until Jan 2nd. Thank you for providing me such a valuable service.
by don'tshootmei'macard on Dec 2, 2009 11:42 PM EST reply actions
Cant blame you for not watching i'macard. I know it hurts you guys to see it happening before your eyes.
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
Tru, you must be, or have been, a coach. This is an excellent breakdown of our young Wildcats to date. Thanks!
Written by Ken not Tru
UL Football Fan/UK Basketball Fan ~ Okinawa, Japan
by The White Mandingo on Dec 3, 2009 6:37 AM EST up reply actions
Re: SamKat
I’m flattered by your words, but believe me, I’m not anywhere near the level of knowledge most coaches possess. I interviewed Kyle Macy a few weeks ago, and I came away from that interview feeling pretty ignorant — Coaches just have a different way at looking at the game, and most have a vast knowledge one can only gain through years of study and experience.
Loved the Analysis!
No sarcasm from me, Ken. I was wondering about the block shot stat. 3-point defense is, so far, indeed sad. I for one never considered that going into the season. My hope is that overall defense increases in intensity as the level of competition increases.
Oh I mean...
…Only that I was wondering what the stat was. Nothing more. Like you read my mind at the time you posted this. And BTW, 8 blocks against UNC seems a bit of a conservative stat line to me. I counted many more. Oh well.
Nice job Ken.......
not so sure I would have been as generous with some of the grades, but only because the one thing no one can really put a finger on is the pressure element yet. As you said, the next couple of weeks are going to tell the tale.We get to Jan 2 and only have 1 loss on the books, and I say that the overall midterm will be an A. However, if by some means of miraclehood we get through the month of December unscathed, and make that New Year’s week another cause for celebration, I say we throw out the gradebook and make travel plans.
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
Thanks ABC
I point you toward my response to WW regarding what he refers to as my “grade inflation.” :)
I don’t expect UK to get through Dec. unscathed, but we can always hope!
I dont think that Calipari has turned them loose yet
I may be wrong, but I seem to sense him pulling the reigns in just a little in each game trying to see how they react to every situation, so he can correct if necessary. Those little teaching sessions with Demarcus are proof that he can get these kids to go above and beyond. We may well find out later that you were not only correct in your assessment, but that they are even better than we know. I just know it is going to be a lot of fun to watch them when he does turn them loose.
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
I agree
It’s still too early for Cal to unleash the beast, even though talent is oozing from their pores.
Nice Ken...
All I know is that our boys better lace ’em up come Saturday! UNC is a bit better than I thought they were going to be at this stage of the season… Watched the 1st half, and the end of the 2nd, of the Heels – Sparties game. If MSU could have shot the 3 ball better, they would have won that game! Just stone cold that night…
We match up pretty well with UNC so it should be a great game! We’ve got the advantage at a couple of positions, while UNC gets the nod at some others… The nice thing is that I know, going into the game, that we are going to be competitive and I didn’t have that feeling the past couple of years…
If your wings don't sweep....
UNC
Carolina is very good. I wish I had watched the Syracuse game to see what happened to them.
I think UK has a big advantage at the 1 spot, and in the post, but other than those two positions (right now) UNC has the upper hand at the other three spots. But the game’s at Rupp, which will probably be the difference maker … it will be electric.
Just please, somebody guard Ed Davis!! :)
Agree with the 1 and the 5 being in UK's favor
Wall > Drew, ‘nuff said!! Alot depends on how you look at Mr Davis and how Roy lines him up, whether at the 4 or 5… Regardless of who UNC puts in the post, I think we’ve got the advantage there. If Davis plays the 4, then you have to give UNC the nod at that spot. And if I was Roy, that’s what I’d do, play Davis at the 4 and let Henson and Wear brothers bang in the post.
If Davis is at the 4, then that moves Thompson to the 3 and that definitely goes in Carolina’s favor. Him at 6’-9 on the wing is a problem for us… If Ginyard goes to the 2, that again is in their favor… He went for 22 the other night and I don’t know if Bledsoe can handle him size-wise, nor can Ramon handle him vis-a-vis foot speed.
I think we’ll see alot of “coaching” in this one in regards to individual match-ups. Getting our “right” bodies on theirs. Pray for quick hands and quicker feet!! :-)
If your wings don't sweep....
This is lovely....
The nice thing is that I know, going into the game, that we are going to be competitive and I didn’t have that feeling the past couple of years…
I couldn’t agree more, Eagle.
I’m not one for dissecting and breaking down our play all that well, so it’s a darn good thing we have you around, Ken. : ) If I may, I would like to add a couple of non-statistical type grades. "Feel-good" grades, if you will…..
This actually goes with what Eagle said in the last sentence of his post — but I would like to give the 2009/2010 ‘Cats an "A" for the fact that I’m not totally nerve-racked before every game. I realize that we aren’t going to win them all, and from here on out the competition certainly heats up, but this team and their confidence has totally given me a bit of peace. I’m actually rather relaxed before our games. I love it, and it feels great.
Let’s take our game on Saturday, for example. I’m certainly not putting a win next to our name by any means, but it feels really good to know going into the game that we have the talent and self-belief to legitimately compete with UNC. It’s amazing how the confidence of a team can radiate so much that it reaches the fans. It’s fabulous.
Also, I would like to give our boys and “A+” for being quite simply the sexiest group in Division 1 Basketball. And while all the other grades on the list such as shooting, rebounding, turnovers, etc. all have the potential to change over the course of the season, this grade will remain unchanged, IMO. : )
AMEN...
i have actually watched every minute of every game – my wife has never seen me so “obsessed” -
I remember in the early pitino years, i had gotten so “scared” to watch and sick of losing after the sutton debacle that i did not fully enjoy the return to relevance – i vowed to never do that again.
i am concerned about UNC and really, really want to beat them – but more importantly, i believe we will be at least competitive. our inexperience is what concerns me the most (and i mean 13 players learning a new system more than youthful inexperience) but i do not worry about our competitiveness…
only one rule in my house - uk has to be your favorite college bball team
by memphis wildcat on Dec 3, 2009 11:51 AM EST up reply actions
Watching every
minute of every game = obsessed? OMG where’s my therapist?
too funny
I knew before I completely read through your post that you’d give them a “grade” on sex appeal. I must say I agree 100%. Looks aside, I absolutely love the game of basketball with a passion. But when you have eye candy, that certainly makes things better!
Grade Inflation
As usual, Ken, your analysis is excellent and quite accurate, however when it comes to handing out the grades you seem to have followed the all too popular trend in education: grade inflation. To hand out a preponderance of A’s with an obligatory A+ thrown in is the height of a Blue-tinted perspective. Nothing wrong with that of course but the problem is it leaves little, if any at all, room for improvement — no where to go but down, in other words — and with 30 or so games remaining. The first real “exam” of the season comers Saturday since it will be the first time UK will face a team of equal physical talent, and one with a tad more experience. Interestingly it is also provides an excellent opportunity to judge Calipari’s performance versus a top coach — Calipari time as John Clay calls it in this piece. Besides that match up the other key on which I’ll focus is the performance of Patrick Patterson: his productivity, effort, focus and leadership will say much about his and the team’s future.
"Learn(ing) without thinking begets ignorance. Think(ing) without learning is dangerous."
-Confucius
uh oh, john clay opening himself up to get it from our resident multi-decade wildcat fan...
Trite but true: UNC doesn’t rebuild as much as it reloads.
That’s the sort of excellence Kentucky hasn’t been able to sustain since its last Final Four trip, and last national title, back in 1998.
only one rule in my house - uk has to be your favorite college bball team
by memphis wildcat on Dec 3, 2009 9:33 AM EST up reply actions
Re: WW
Well, I certainly understand your point, but the way I look at it, if UK is 10th nationally (fg%), 4th nationally (off. reb.%), and 1st nationally (bpg) I’m not sure, statistically speaking, that there is much need for improvement. And I’ll take +12.4 in overall rebounding and 37.9% 3-pt shooting all day long, and twice on Sunday.
Whether they maintain their statistical dominance is now the true test.
Of course, all of these numbers are factual, but how one evaluates them is totally subjective.
Ken
thanks for taking the time to put that together. Can’t see much to disagree with you on.
If this was a veteran team I would really question the schedule we’ve played so far. EVERY team has been outclassed in terms of talent, size, depth and normally not sure how playing that schedule would help you at all.
This isn’t a veteran team and most nights we’re starting 3 freshman, a sophomore, and a junior. I think the schedule has allowed Coach C to coach and teach and at the same time build confidence rolling into the tougher part of the schedule. I almost have to throw out the Cancun games because of the situation down there but in my eyes….there’s been a consistent improvement in almost every area.
We played under control for the entire game Monday night. We played a pressing trapping defense and looked good doing it. Assists galore and only a few turnovers. Monday night might have been the mid-term exam so to speak heading into the rest of the year and I think we certainly got an A.
Playing the remaining non-conference games including UNC, UCONN, IU, UofL and then into the always tough SEC is certainly going to be a challenge for this team. As someone noted, it’s great to see us with the horse’s to run and bang with anyone.
Go CATS!!!
No problem UKlvrJM
I agree — This team has shown imporovement since that first game against Morehead, and I’m not sure we can ask for more than that, at least at this point. I am concerned with the FT shooting, although some of that concern is alleviated by the solid FT shooting of the guards.
You can tell the team is beginning to react and not over-think … that’s the first step to being scary.
Match-Ups
Saturday will feature some interesting match-ups. Drew II vs. Wall will be interesting. Cousins will finally have his hands full.
Our saving grace should be Patterson.
It seems that the guards are learning to play well together, and the guards are learning to play well with the big men; I’d like to see Patterson and Cousins playing better together. It seems that one of them is usually doing well.
If they start playing well together, we will be a nightmare to match up with.
I agree
I like Wall’s chances of handling Drew, and I think the Patterson/Zeller matchup is definitely a plus for UK. UNC is very talented, as usual, but they too are young. It should be a very interesting/entertaining game.
Great post Ken,
Your grades are spot on I think. I think this team has the early makings of a LOT of wins. So far, we have seen them fight back from a couple of deficits and I am glad to see that. I had missed that part of the Wildcats. A determination to never give up. And that is so sweet.
I really think that on Saturday the guys will want this win very badly. I expect we will see the swagger of this team excel past the A+. We are climbing back to the top of that mountain, just like the state of the Commonwealth speech promised. We have seen their chemistry grow so fast and I see the FUN back in my team. I choose that above all else. :-)
Blue... there is no other color to Bleed !!!
One more factor, and perhaps most important
Good analysis Ken, but there’s one more factor!
CLUTCH
Have we been able to seal the deal in a close game and make the clutch play? John Wall has been awesome, but we’ve missed some key free throws to put the game away. I think it’s a maturity factor playing so many freshmen and we’ll improve as the year goes on. But overall, this is a team of winners, and we’ve been doing it so far. So we get a solid B+ in my book.
Excellent point!
Some guys just refuse to lose. It’s nice to have several of those types of players wearing the blue and white.
Speaking of...
the blue and white, I still think we will see new uniforms on the team on Saturday. I wouldn’t grade the team uniforms now a A, maybe a C+.If you want to be the best, you need to recruit the best(check), to beat the best. Why not look the best? This could really be a “new” coming out party, starting Saturday.
Unless/Until They Lose ...
I grade them A+ for being undefeated.
by FortyYearCatFan on Dec 3, 2009 11:44 AM EST reply actions
Well Said...
100% is an A+ on any scale…
only one rule in my house - uk has to be your favorite college bball team
by memphis wildcat on Dec 3, 2009 11:54 AM EST up reply actions
So True!!!
How badly I would love for this group to have an undefeated season!!!
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
Now
that is setting a very tough goal! Many talented, veteran teams have tried to do that since IU accomplished it and have come up short. Great to fantasize about but not likely to happen. I would just as soon they drop one of the upcoming early games (UL excepted of course) as to get later in the season and be vulnerable when the games count the most. I see free throw shooting as our most likely Achilles Heel.
Agree
If the FT shooting % doesn’t go up, it will cost UK a victory.
By no stretch do I think UK will go undefeated, and a loss or two is exactly what a young group of great players sometimes need. We can’t have them believing what we write:)
Advance peek at ONE line in Saturday's box...
If I could choose such a line, it would be the one with Big Cuz’s name on it. To me, he’s the least tested Cat, physically and psychologically, and the biggest unknown going into December. A solid month by him would be good omen indeed.
Great write-up as usual, Ken!
.
I like your “team chemistry” grade, and in some regards agree with it.
But as “team defense” is so reliant on “team chemistry”.. what grade would you give our Team Defense at this point?
After a while it is no longer a coincidence that opposing teams are “getting their shots” and some individuals are blowing up and having some of the best games of their lives against us.
I think that two of the main ingredients of building a strong team defense are: (1) chemistry, and (2) willingness to play hard. And since I do believe that we have both of those ingredients, I am pretty confident that our team defense will just keep getting better and better as the season progresses.
But even for now, we have to stop some guys from getting their shots….
by Sonic on Dec 3, 2009 1:44 PM EST reply actions
Sometimes
you get the bear, sometimes the bear gets you. Duke leads the nation in team defense but could not stop a hot and inspired Wisconsin last night (still jumping up and down). Team defense for UK will improve but even then a team can get hot and hit everything they throw at the basket.
Yep, that's true...
but there are only so many times we can say an opponent “got hot and hit everything” before coincidence starts to blur with trend.
Like I said, I am not worried about where our team defense will be headed. Or where it will be by the time the NCAA Tournament starts— it will be very good.
The “team defense” that I am talking about really doesn’t have everything to do with opponent FG% or points scored, but is rather a more subjective view of how much of a psychological drain facing our defense is on our opponents. And right now, I do not think that it is much of one. Which is why my own grade of our team defense would be “C”.
When will it start the rise to a grade of “A”? The first time I see a quote like this from an opponent: “Wow… facing them was just so draining… it was like pulling teeth out there to get the shots we wanted…”
I believe that when we start seeing quotes like that, it will not so coincidentally be in the middle of a loooong winning streak against even the stronger teams on our schedule…. :-)
by Sonic on Dec 3, 2009 7:32 PM EST up reply actions
Team Defense
I broke down defense into three-point and overall — If one looks at pure fg % allowed, 36.6% is excellent, but allowing over 35% 3-pt shooting won’t get the job done. But, as I stated, I think they will improve on that number as they gain experience and have the need to stop the 3 drilled into their noggins by Calipari.
I agree with everything you wrote, by the way, especially the last line.
Thanks for the kind words!
Great analysis, Ken
Give the guys some slack on the three points allowed, though. Sometimes, David shows up and there is nothing you can do about it other than weather the slingshots. Cal calls it everybody’s Super Bowl.
Great thing about this team: they have, so far, weathered the shots until the sling runs dry.
No matter where you're at, there you are
Ken gets an 'A' for team analysis
Good job, Ken…
This is my first exposure to your site (that I can remember)
I was so impressed, I signed up on the spot.
Where have I been?
Go Big Blue!
Glad to have ya!
Kinda new here myself… This is kind of a cozy place, with lots of characters, but be advised, it’s easy to fall into the looking glass!! :-)
If your wings don't sweep....
You'll love it here!
Tru and Ken are fantastic!
It is not worth an intelligent man’s time to be in the majority. By definition, there are already enough people to do that.
by kentuckygirl0724 on Dec 4, 2009 11:43 AM EST up reply actions
Well, I kinda thought we were ALL pretty special, but if you want to suck up to
just Tru and Ken I guess the rest of us cant stop you………;-}
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
LOL!
Youre right ABC. EVERYONE here is pretty special. My apologies. I was going from the writers stanpoint. :)
It is not worth an intelligent man’s time to be in the majority. By definition, there are already enough people to do that.
by kentuckygirl0724 on Dec 5, 2009 9:25 AM EST up reply actions


















