Pure Defensive and Offensive Efficiency
Thanks to Mr. SEC, some stats to ponder
November 2nd, 2009 8:42 am ║ Posted By: John Pennington ║ Permalink ║ Tags: Alabama, Arkansas, Auburn, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, LSU, Mississippi State, Ole Miss, South Carolina, Tennessee, Vanderbilt
Send this article to a friend
When your defense ranks among the best of the SEC, it also ranks among the best in the nation. And that’s certainly true for the top three defenses in this week’s Pure Efficiency ratings for defense.
To tally this statistic, we take the total number of plays a defense plays in league-games only. Then we divide that number by the total number of touchdowns a team has allowed. This tells us how many plays (on average) teams run between touchdowns against the SEC’s defenses in conference play.
This measures a defense’s real stinginess. It also provides a look at overall team efficiency, as team’s with turnover-prone offenses tend to put their defenses in bad situations.
Pure Efficiency — Defense
| Rank |
School |
Defensive Plays |
Touchdowns Allowed |
Plays/TD |
| 1 |
Alabama |
339 |
4 |
84.75 |
| 2 |
Tennessee |
337 |
5 |
67.40 |
| 3 |
Florida |
336 |
6 |
56.00 |
| 4 tie |
LSU |
332 |
8 |
41.50 |
| 4 tie |
Ole Miss |
332 |
8 |
41.50 |
| 6 |
Vanderbilt |
361 |
12 |
30.08 |
| 7 |
S. Carolina |
377 |
13 |
29.00 |
| 8 |
Miss. State |
339 |
13 |
26.07 |
| 9 |
Auburn |
425 |
20 |
21.25 |
| 10 |
Georgia |
413 |
20 |
20.65 |
| 11 |
Kentucky |
328 |
17 |
19.29 |
| 12 |
Arkansas |
344 |
19 |
18.10 |
<!-- <p class="postmetadata"><a href="http://mrsec.com/story/sec-stats-pure-defensive-efficiency-week-nine#respond" title="Comment on SEC Stats: PUre Defensive Efficiency, Week Nine">Comments »</a></p> --> SEC Stats: Pure Offensive Efficiency, Week Nine
November 2nd, 2009 8:32 am ║ Posted By: John Pennington ║ Permalink ║ Tags: Alabama, Arkansas, Auburn, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, LSU, Mississippi State, Ole Miss, South Carolina, Tennessee, Vanderbilt
Send this article to a friend
Through nine weeks of the season — though we’re looking only at the results from in-conference games at the behest of some readers – it’s becoming clear which SEC offenses have what it takes to score. And which ones don’t.
The SEC’s defenses are clearly dominant this year, which makes those offenses at the top of our efficiency ratings so impressive: they’re putting up good numbers in the face of the nation’s top run-stuffers and ballhawks.
Here’s an example of just how good SEC defenses are. In five games against conference foes, Vanderbilt has scored just three offensive touchdowns. On Saturday against 11th ranked Georgia Tech, Vandy tallied — you guessed it — three touchdowns in one game.
The SEC is absolutely brutal when it comes to suffocating defenses.
As always, we figure “Pure Efficiency” for the offense by taking the total offensive snaps run by a unit and dividing that number by the total number of touchdowns recorded by that offense. That tells you how many plays each offense needs (on average) to score a touchdown in SEC play.
This rank gives a good idea to overall team efficiency as well, because a turnover-creating defense can give an offense short fields with which to work.
Pure Efficiency — Offense
| Rank |
School |
Offensive Plays |
Touchdowns |
Plays/TD |
| 1 |
Georgia |
359 |
18 |
19.94 |
| 2 |
Arkansas |
329 |
16 |
20.56 |
| 3 |
Tennessee |
324 |
15 |
21.60 |
| 4 |
Florida |
398 |
15 |
26.53 |
| 5 |
Auburn |
432 |
16 |
27.00 |
| 6 |
Kentucky |
340 |
12 |
28.33 |
| 7 |
Alabama |
326 |
11 |
29.63 |
| 8 |
LSU |
316 |
10 |
31.60 |
| 9 |
Miss. State |
339 |
10 |
33.90 |
| 10 |
Ole Miss |
350 |
9 |
38.88 |
| 11 |
S. Carolina |
420 |
10 |
42.00 |
| 12 |
Vanderbilt |
330 |
3 |
110.00 |
0 recs |
0 comments
| Add comment















