A Long Hard Look Ahead....
OK, we got thumped by MSU at home on Homecoming Day. Now we have to move on.MSU did us a really big favor by showing the rest of the world what our weaknesses are. Maybe we can give Ol' Rich& Co. a hand in fixing them.
Let's break them down and see where the solutions are.
- Injuries: They are killing us in more than one position, but the good news is that they are not serious and we should have most everyone back healthy BEFORE Vandy, and maybe as soon as Eastern.We should see Trevard back as well as Micah on defense. That should fill a few of those holes that allowed 300 yds rushing last night. Of course, if they are not utilized properly, it won't make a dime's worth of difference. Offensively, we need to rest Locke this week. Just put his butt on the bench and take his uniform if that's what it takes to get him healthy. We are going to need him to get through the rest of the schedule. We have very capable backups that need reps. Moncell Allen and Trey Bowland can run the ball. We do not have to give up the ground game to rest some guys.
- Planning: There is no other way to say this nicely so I will just say it. We have been outcoached on more than one occasion this season. This is not a bash on anyone, it is a fact. We cannot continue to do the same thing week in and week out and expect thatno one will be able to adjust to us. We are NOT Bama. We cannot simply walk into a stadium, look the other side in the eye and say "We will be running the ball today and there is nothing you can do about it". We have got to put the ball in the air enough to keep the other side honest. And we have to complete the passes we throw. Randall Cobb CAN throw the ball. Is he the second coming of Willie Joe Namath?, no. But he has a great arm and can do anything with the football. He has shown he has legs that just won't quit. Now we need to showcase his arm some more.Newton is coming along nicely, and will continue to get better, but Cobb needs to be able to throw a pass when we need it. Have a little faith Joker, there are answers at WR. We will get into those in a minute. I know that for some reason we seem to think that Cobb and Locke are the only returners we have, but that is not so. Let the other guys return the ball this week. Let's see what they can do. And Steve Brown and Rick Petri.....let me just say this....I am 6'0", and weigh about 320lbs. I have 2 bad knees and move slower than molasses. And I will bet that I can gain yards on you guys just by being smarter. Use your heads. Adjust when necessary. A RUN blitz is not a bad thing. Let those safeties do their job and make the other team beat you by tricking you, not by slapping you in the face and running over you.
- Personnel: We have some really good players on this team, and we have some superstars, and we have some decent utility players. Randall Cobb and Derrick Locke do not have to play every posiiton. Our receiver corps is good, but so far they are getting very little chance to show it. Chris Matthews needs catches.....I do not believe he is as bad as he seems to be so far. Gene McCaskill can catch, and knows how to run after he does it. LaRod King showed last night that he can take a hit and hold on to the ball. Reward him.....get the ball to him and see how he does. Our running back situation, while not quite as good, is still very adequate. Let's use our strengths and make the defense have to guess what is going to happen. Newton is coming along nicely as I said before, just keep moving the pocket. His 1st reaction should be to throw, and also his second....but using his legs has been successful, so why not let Cobb try and throw to him every blue moon. We have players that can run this Wildcat offense, and even the true option. USE that. But don't be so predictable that EVERY PERSON ON THIS BLOG would know what you were going to do like we did last night. We were calling the plays before you ran them, literally. If you rest our stars a little and let them take over a game in the 2nd half, they will make some big plays.
- Coach Brooks, you have got to get everyone on your staff on the same page. Every week we have another facet of our team falling apart. Yes, the players must execute the game plan, but anyone could see that the Defense was out of it yesterday for the entire 2nd half. Players were out of position to help stop the run, and I for one do not believe it was all their fault. Dont let your coaches put Newton in a 3rd and goal, or a 4th and goal and have to throw the ball.....not to win a game at this point.
I have seen enough of this group this year to know that there are big time plays in a lot of guys. But when we allow ourselves to be so predictable that the opposition can see the holes, and then walk right through them, we have a problem. This late in the season is no time to go soul searching for what ails us. It is time to put our heads down and play football.
0 recs |
36 comments
| Add comment
Comments
Another Solution?
I’m about to prove that old adage that “opinions are like a-holes, everyone has one”. I’m sure many won’t agree but after 53 years on earth, Frankly Scarlett………..
After the Auburn game I had a temporary loss of my senses…..I actually took a drink of the Brooks koolaid and briefly thought that I was wrong about the coach and his staff. Then came a crashing return of reality as I watched the LM game and sobered up as I watched a team we should have destroyed play us much closer than the final score. The Miss. St. game reminded me of why I’ve always felt UK deserved better than Mitch’s 20th choice.
We were out coached in every facet of the game on homecoming night. Outcoached in the 8th game of the season by a team that we SHOULD have beat. We will “probably/hopefully” wind up with a 6-6 season and will be VERY lucky to get to the Music City Bowl. The kids on this team, the student body and the UK fan base all deserve better!!
Several have already said…“well that happens”. In the 8th game of the season? In the 7th season? Didn’t it also happen in the South Carolina game??? Is there anyone out there that doesn’t feel this team should be 6-2 or at WORST 5-3?
All teams deal with injuries, UK’s problems are beyond injuries. Another solution to those problems would be for Barnhart to man up like he did with Gillispie and rip off this bandaid. Advise Coach Brooks to announce his retirement and allow the fans to show their appreciation for him at the last home game. Then announce that Coach Brook’s replacment will not be a named heir but the best available coach that can be found.
If that’s Joker….well obviously that wouldn’t be Joker would it?
by UKlvrJM on Nov 1, 2009 10:00 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Wooried about you
You’re starting to make too much sense. Calm down or the ‘rah, rah’ will start saying you have a ‘football fetish’.
Keep up to good posts.
I have be correctly accused of having a 'football fetish'. You know, someone who doesn't think football is the warm up sport to basketball season.
by ParisGuy on Nov 2, 2009 9:22 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I Wish
Barnhart was my boss. Is there anyone out there working for a company where results like this wouldn’t get you fired? Oooooooh, we’re in the SEC and we’re a basketball school so what do you expect?
I can just see someone telling their boss, Oooooh we’re a small bank and all those bigger banks have soooooooo many advantages….you should be happy that I opened 6 accounts this year.
Insert your profession ______ and then think about it. We should all work for Barnhart!!!!
by UKlvrJM on Nov 2, 2009 9:46 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
anything is possible, but not likely....
I cant see Barnhart giving up on his formula at this point. If the staff makes some really egregious error, maybe. Pushing Brooks into retirement may not be necessary….after a few more games like Saturday he may decide to go home. I heard that he wanted to try to retire with a winning record, but I don’t think that is possible at this point, because when you only win one more than you lose annually, its hard to dig out of a hole.
Everyone says we are getting what we are going to get…..I just don’t think that is a smart approach by Barnhart and Co., but as long as we no longer have a losing record, I would say things will continue status quo……
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on Nov 2, 2009 8:10 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Can You Imagine?
making that same post in regard to the b-ball team? I agree with you 100% and feel strongly that this is the administration’s problem…..the acceptance of this status quo.
Too many people find too many excuses for the current state of this program and it frustrates me to no end. 7 seasons and it will be a struggle to get into the Music City Bowl or something similar. Can anyone out there look at this program and tell me that we’re “building”? Building what?
by UKlvrJM on Nov 2, 2009 9:38 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
There were some "similar" posts about BCG early this year, although not with as much
clarity"…..Cats fans are ALWAYS going to ask the questions….have no fear
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on Nov 2, 2009 10:23 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Credit!
Well I believe in giving credit where credit is due and while I scratch my head about the BCG hire in the first place…..especially when you read Calipari was expecting a phone call every day…….I give Barnhart and the administration huge props for having the guts to make a hard decision and do what was best for the program.
Apparently “best for program” means something else when it comes to football!!
by UKlvrJM on Nov 2, 2009 10:40 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ole Barney
What other decision could Barnhart have made? Do you think the Wildcat faithful would have stood for another NIT sesson?
We are very cumfortable in football. We are one of 68 of 120 teams going to a bowl and we buy three of the six wins to get eligible. A great formula. As long as Louisville stays bad, that’s four. Miss State doesn’t look like its going to play along anymore and be the fifth and then there’s Vandy. This year, we had the perfect game at Auburn. A great win. One of the best played games we have had.
We’ll get our six wins, Another bowl, moe statue talk for Brooks outside the stadium, basketball comes in and every one’s happy. Barnhart will get his bonus for us going to a bowl. ETC.
I have be correctly accused of having a 'football fetish'. You know, someone who doesn't think football is the warm up sport to basketball season.
by ParisGuy on Nov 2, 2009 12:07 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Remember that Barnhart and Brooks have a long history
and Brooks has given us success…..just not where a lot of us want to be….but considering the 10 yrs previous to Brooks, he has every right to blow his own horn(which he never does). I know the Bowl game and stats are inflated concerning how bowls are handled now, and I have raised Cain more than anyone about that, but those are the only stats we have. If Brooks was 20 yrs younger and “upwardly mobile” then he would have a resume( based solely on what he has done at Kentucky) that might warrant him getting a shot at a bigger football school. I really and honestly believe that this problem is higher than Brooks or Barnhart….if the people holding the purse strings want results, then they turn over more $$$ and we get more for it…..The one thing that I had forgotten in this process and that has enlightened me recently is this.
The big money people that donate at UK are Basketball people. If you donate funds to the University of Kentucky, you can stipulate, or “earmark” those funds for certain things, i.e. the Wildcat “Coal” Lodge. The big time money people may not be shelling out all that much for football, or complaining loud enough. Until we get a T.Boone Pickens here at Kentucky that demands his money be spent on football, I dont see a lot more cash being funnelled into the program. I am not saying it can’t be done, just that it isn’t likely.
I will never say we don’t have a right to complain as fans, or that we should be satisfied with what we have. I have always said to anyone who will listen that this "geographically challenged " notion is pure barnyard fodder. Money is what brings these kids in….and I am not talking about bags of cash either. Newer and bigger facilities, money spent directly on the players in the form of equipment and training assistance, those things all follow the funding. The basketball program has a lodge…..the football team has what, a dorm??
We dont have as many Joe Craft’s or E.J. Nutters out there as we used to, due to the economy going into the tank, so this thing would take a while even if the wheels began turning today. It can be done, and we are a really good candidate for doing it. This state would support a football program as well or better than any other, actually we do it now, it just isn’t a priority in our lives like basketball has become. We just have to continue to push for it, and be ready when someone with the big bucks decides to step up.
I will make a prediction on this…..when Spurrier manages his first SEC title in football at USC, UK will get serious about it, because then it will be proven that it can be done. Right now, no one( who really needs to) really believes in it and that is our single biggest stumbling block.
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on Nov 2, 2009 12:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Spurrier will
NEVER win an SEC title at South Carolina. NEVER, NEVER, NEVER. He won’t even win the SEC east at S.C. NEVER, NEVER, NEVER. Spurrier got a membership to Augusta when he took the S.C. job. That membership is priceless. Time has also proved he is not an offensive genius. Money gets you facilities, very good assistant coaches, and three private jets to transport sick players to away games. It doesn’t guarantee wins though. Your state has to produce top talent to win. Anybody that thinks differently about the talent pool is just hardheaded. Football is not like basketball. It only takes a few players to be very good in basketball, but in football it takes large amounts of recruits EVERY YEAR to be very good.
by Grasslands1 on Nov 2, 2009 3:46 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I still say the ol' ball coach has one more in him.....
and Florida cannot rule forever……Tebow HAS to graduate sometime…..
Money brings you everything else you need……including all of those other things….you take a recruit that sees LSU’s football facilities, and our football facilities, ask him to choose between the two, with all else being equal, he chooses LSU every time….you put enough $$$$ with a big time recruiting coach and you get results….may take 2-3 years….but you get results
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on Nov 2, 2009 4:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
USC vs Kentucky
How many times has he beaten us? OK, how many times at South Carolina? I believe in the few years he’s been at Columbia he has beaten every team in the Eastern Division at least once. Since Brooks has be at UK. Once against Georgis and four times against Vandy.
Which one of the two programs do you think has a better chance of getting to the SEC Championship Game first?
Comparing Brooks to Spurrier is almost as silly as comparing him to Bryant. Other than he and Bryant both coached at UK it stops there.
Anyway our coach in waitihg comes to us from the South Carolina pipe line. That shoud prove he’s a winner. Right?
I have be correctly accused of having a 'football fetish'. You know, someone who doesn't think football is the warm up sport to basketball season.
by ParisGuy on Nov 2, 2009 7:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
So you agree with my wife huh?
Maybe it is hardheaded and in general I agree with you but if you apply that logic…..why do we even have a football team?
I haven’t really paid a lot of attention to the number of recruits each state produces but I don’t think CIncinnati suddenly started out recruiting Ohio St. Hell, Louisville with the right coach proves you wrong. If Petrino were still at Louisville….do you honestly believe we’d be beating them?
Recruits are important and anyone would be ignorant to question that but did Miami suddenly start recruiting bad players or did they have the wrong coach? Flordia between Spurrier and Meyer wasn’t so great was it?
Spurrier may not win a championship at SC but then look at Pitino at Louisville….hasn’t really had the same success has he? Would you be willing to bet against Pitino winning a championship at Louisville, probably not. Well the same could be said for Spurrier.
by UKlvrJM on Nov 2, 2009 5:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I know everyone thinks I am nuts about Spurrier
but you do not build what he built at Florida without knowing what you are doing, and knowing how to build a program…..and besides….he has an ego almost as big as mine…..he cannot stand to fail
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on Nov 2, 2009 6:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Pitino will NEVER
win an NCAA Championship at UL. Yes, I will bet on it. He had probably his best chance last year. I am not saying he won’t get UL to another final 4, but I don’t think he will win one at UL. I do think Ohio State would beat Cincinnati if they played. The Big East is no Big 10. When you start thinking Big East football teams can compete with the better teams of the top tier conferences you lose some credibility with me. And the Big 10 doesn’t impress me either but they are a top tier conference. People give UL to much credit for winning the Orange Bowl against Oklahoma a few years ago. It should seem obvious by now that Oklahoma’s players have a hard time getting pumped up for any bowl game that’s not for the hole ball of wax. One thing, and a lot of people do not think about is that UK was on probation and then paying for their probation that helped Petrino out significantly in recruiting. He also recruited payers that Brooks wouldn’t be interested because of their character in my opinion and something that Krag has even mentioned. I actually won a nice bet against a very knowledgeable football fan when he said UK would continue to lose to UL. Miami struggled to recover from there Pell Grant fiasco and they had bad coaching. Ron Zook was a very good recruiter, he just had to many other flaws to succeed at Florida ala BG at UK. Name the price of the bet on Pitino and Spurrier and email it to me and I will be glad to put my money in escrow until both are gone from their particular schools.
by Grasslands1 on Nov 2, 2009 8:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Speaking of giving UL credit
Louisville beat a weak ACC champ in Wake Forest, not Oklahoma.
by wklawdog on Nov 2, 2009 8:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Never??
First, I can’t imagine betting on Pitino or Spurrier in anything. I will say never is a very long time so if you’re going to apply it properly you should probably say Brooks will NEVER win a SEC Championship.
Second, Cincinnati is ranked 4th or 5th depending on the poll. My point was is that their coaching staff or their recruits…….I’ll answer my own question….THEIR COACHING STAFF. Yes they play in the Big East but Utah didn’t seem that impressed by the SEC last year.
Third, I said if Pitrino was still at Louisville……they’d be beating us. If you don’t want to give their program any credit for what John L and Pitrino did, that’s your call.
You sound like a Duke fan…..well Calipari recruits players that Coach K wouldn’t be interested in. Talk to any UofL fan and they’ll tell you that’s just BS that Kragthorpe supporters…..they’re about 3 left…….say.
You want another never……..this program sadly will NEVER be at the level it should be as long as the current status quo is accepted.
by UKlvrJM on Nov 2, 2009 9:56 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You start off making no sense.
Going to apply never, and having to do it properly, what the heck does Brooks have to do with the word never. You said that I would not bet on Spurrier winning an SEC Championship or Pitino winning the NCAA’s. When was Brooks mentioned? You were wrong and I am willing to back my prediction up.
I could care less where Cincy is ranked. It doesn’t mean that they are great. So what, they are undefeated in the Little East. That is one of the problems with the BCS. The Big East does not deserve an automatic in to a major bowl but since they get one it must be justified.
If Petrino would of stayed, I don’t believe they would have a 7 game win streak against us. Anytime a big school is on probation, it benefits the other big school or schools in the state. Anybody can bring in recruits the wrong way. Fran Curci and probation comes to mind.
Coach K has been recruiting the same type of players as everybody else for a long time now. He just hasn’t been able to get some of them lately.
The level it should be? What level is that? I can’t wait to hear this. We can get to a higher level, no doubt in my mind, but you aren’t Dorothy and this isn’t the wizard of Oz. I have NEVER heard one person ever say they thought Brooks was going to win a National Championship. I have never even heard anybody from UK even say he was hired to win one. If that is what you are expecting, you are going to be a miserable football fan. I do expect UK to hire a football coach someday and his job will be to win a National Championship, I might not live long enough to see it, but I think it will happen.
by Grasslands1 on Nov 3, 2009 1:34 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Why?
Since we’re intertwining sports…did Louisville hire Pitino to win National Championships? Did SC hire Spurrier to win National Championships? Did Arkansas hire Petrino to win National Championships? You can answer those however you want but the bottom line is they hired who they perceived as the BEST coach available.
We can argue all the other stuff from every angle but here’s a simple question for you……..at the time was Brooks the best coach UK could hire? Here’s another simple one…..does it make sense to turn over the program to his hand picked heir?
btw…..making no sense….we’re suddenly a “big school” huh and our probation allowed Petrino to gobble up all those recruits you’ve been saying don’t exist in Kentucky….scratching my head over that logic.
The level? Well in my humble opinion…especially with the watered down schedule Barny has set up for his buddy the last few years……we should be winning 8 games EVERY season. We shouldn’t be playing a pathetic UofL team at home and almost getting beat. We shouldn’t be getting beat by Miss. St on homecoming night. We shouldn’t be “hoping” we get to the Music City Bowl.
Finally, I’ve been a miserable UK football fan for my entire life. Watching the up and downs of this program since Charlie Bradshaw…..you don’t have to tell me how miserable it is to be a UK football fan. Saturday night was just the most recent example of that misery.
by UKlvrJM on Nov 3, 2009 8:15 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No offense, Grasslands
but everything he wrote was perfectly understandable.
by Sonic on Nov 3, 2009 11:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
South Carolina for example
Was Odem’s basketball program at South Carolina as weak as the Cat’s program is in football?
I think he won a couple of NITs back to back.
Tha AD at Columbia appartently was satisfied with the baby step approach and hired some one who brought life to the program. Why would a football, baseball school do such a thing?
Us being a basketball school doesn’t mean we have to settle for bottom tier football does it? Well, yea, maybe it does.
I noticed the women’s basketball team was in the ‘also got votes’ in the first poll. I hope they improve and have a good season.
I have be correctly accused of having a 'football fetish'. You know, someone who doesn't think football is the warm up sport to basketball season.
by ParisGuy on Nov 2, 2009 12:14 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Hang on there a minute now Paris....
we ARE winning more than we are losing…..so I think that qualifies us as being above the “bottom tier”….SC is a good example of what can be done if you put your mind to it as far as hiring the talent on the coaching side….it just has not( as of yet) translated into wins. I believe it will, because both of those coaches at SC demand more of themselves and their players if that is what it takes to get the job done. Both Spurrier and Horn are good coaches. Time will tell if they have climbed the ladder yet, but so far they look pretty good…..we shall see if they can compete in basketball soon enough.
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on Nov 2, 2009 1:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Sad!
I think it’s sad when we’re comparing ourselves to SC but I agree with both of you. As you’ve both outlined, until outside forces put pressure on the administration to do better…..then we’re going to get what we pay for. Don’t know about you two but I don’t have T. Boone’s resources so it’ll have to be someone else stepping up to do that!!!
Bottom line….until 65,000 quit showing up just to tailgate and demand improvment by not buying tickets…..nothings going to change.
by UKlvrJM on Nov 2, 2009 1:50 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
How many tiers are you considering?
Two? One of the top six in the league? Not quite.
Three? One of the top four in the conference? Get serious.
Four? We qualify for the third group. But who are the three worst at this time?
I want a winner too. But wishing, hoping and praying ain’t going to get it.
What is so depressing is the approach we are taking to get ‘respectful’. We just signed a four game contract with the team that is 120th in the country. We have Charleston Southern on the schedule for hext year. That one will draw respect won’t it?
We want to brag about getting to a bowl game and with only 68 teams going it would be sorta difficult not to.
I heard that some pne is pushing for all teams that win six gets a open chance to get to a bowl. No conference tie ins considered. Won’t that be a jolly good time?
I have be correctly accused of having a 'football fetish'. You know, someone who doesn't think football is the warm up sport to basketball season.
by ParisGuy on Nov 2, 2009 7:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree it is
pitiful to play Charleston Southern like Florida did this year and we will next year. I have no problem with the Western deal though. You have to schedule some cupcakes since in football you don’t play exhibition games. It might as well benefit a Kentucky school money wise instead of somebody else. Nobody does or will ever schedule four good teams out of their conference. It would be suicide. It makes no sense for UK to beef up their non conference schedule at this time.
by Grasslands1 on Nov 2, 2009 8:10 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Them being in Kentucky carries a lot of weight with me
although I do not think I would have scheduled anyone for 4 years……maybe 3….1 neutral and 2 home…..
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on Nov 2, 2009 9:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Just so were clear here....Charleston Southern played Florida this year
and we are scheduling them now…..so we are not happy that we are doing the same thing as Florida???
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on Nov 2, 2009 9:18 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Let me go out on the limb here
and predict that we don’t beat them 62-3
by UKlvrJM on Nov 2, 2009 10:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, I'll be darned.
A meeting of the Rich Brooks and Mitch Barnhart’s Detractor’s Club.
How nice.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Nov 3, 2009 10:12 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
This is just the planning committee
The main club will meet either when we don’t go to the Music City Bowl or when we do and we’re asking why?
by UKlvrJM on Nov 3, 2009 10:39 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That was NOT the intent when I started this thread......lol.......
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on Nov 3, 2009 10:59 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Naw, just looking at the new approach to winning football in the Bluegrass
We’re only playing Charleston Southern because Florida did. They certainly needed that win to get to bowl eligihlty. Of couse we don’t need our non conference wins as much as they do. Didn’t we stomp Louisville, (by four points), and man handle Miami of OHIO? That alone should scare our three SEC opponents remaining. Ah, respect, just an inch or say away. Do you know we have actually beat a team this year that HAS a winning record? Better than last year. 92th rated offense in the country, led by the coach in wating. . Gets better all the time if you look in the right places.
Let’s hope Vandy doesn’t raise up and decide they really don’t want to be in last place in the division.
None of the conference teams remaining have a winning record. That should give us cause to think we aren’t out manned. Stranger things have happened. We can still get to some where souht of Tennessee if we can win two of the final three.
I have be correctly accused of having a 'football fetish'. You know, someone who doesn't think football is the warm up sport to basketball season.
by ParisGuy on Nov 3, 2009 3:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
A hardheaded guy with a fetish........
Make sure and tell all your friends!!!;) Apparently we just don’t get it…….football in the Bluegrass is a loooooooooooooooooooong term project. We have no recruits, play in a conference that we have no business being in, we’re a BASKETBALL School for chrisakes, we should be THRILLED to barely beat Louisville, Thrilled to make a top notch bowl like the Music CIty, don’t you understand……..this is just an excuse to tailgate in the fall before heading to Keeneland!!!!
by UKlvrJM on Nov 3, 2009 6:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 












