Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: 2012 Africa Cup Of Nations Final

Kentucky @ Louisville: Post Mortem

Btn_ball_medium

Words fail me.  But life goes on.  I'm breaking out the Woodford to properly medicate my bruised and mangled pride -- neat, no rocks.

Congratulations to the Louisville Cardinals for a noble victory.  Great game by Edgar Sosa, and as much as it sucks to lose on an NBA+ 3-pointer, there's not much else Kentucky could have done.  It was an amazing job by the 'Cats to tie the game, but alas, great shooting undoes all else.

I really don't feel like making a long post here, because I am bitterly disappointed in this loss.  Kentucky defended Louisville about as well as could be expected, particularly in the last seven or eight minutes of the second half.  Patrick Patterson and Jodie Meeks were as awesome as they could be expected to be, it's just that Louisville picked this game to make perimeter shots and free throws.  I warned in my pre-game comments that we probably could not beat Louisville if they shot well from three, and unfortunately, my prediction came true in dramatic fashion.

I continue to be disappointed in our ballhandling, particularly by Jodie Meeks.  He had six turnovers, and that really besmirched an otherwise excellent game.  But to be fair, without him, we would have been crushed by 20+.  So I guess that's just one of those things he will have to work harder on.  I think the biggest problem there is that Jodie just refuses to make the simple pass.  He wants to make the astounding pass.  Despite his obvious skill, he has a lot to learn.

I didn't expect Samuels to be much of a factor, and he wasn't.  I was very surprised at the poor game by Earl Clark, but the most remarkable thing was Louisville's accuracy from the perimeter, where they went 11-20.  That is way, way over their season average, and as good as they are in other phases of the game, they are darn near unbeatable when they shoot well from the perimeter.  Not only that, they picked this game to make their free throws.  What can you say except,  "Good job."

If we forget the turnovers, Kentucky played very well considering the competition, shooting an eFG% of 53% against one of the elite defensive teams in the nation, the highest any team has shot against the Cardinals.  For comparison, in their three losses, the Cards' opponents have averaged an eFG% of 48.2%.  So I think we can say, despite the turnovers, that UK gave a very good effort. 

Well, I suppose I have to hand out some individual kudos here, although I hope you will forgive me for a lack of enthusiasm.  I am not nearly medicated enough yet, and still in considerable pain.  But here goes.

  • I am now a believer in Michael Porter.  He was terrific.  I am now gulping the Porter Kool-aid just as I said I would.
  • Meeks and Patterson were awesome, and Patterson was utterly indomitable against the highest level of competition.  I was surprised that the Cardinals kept fouling him on rebounds, but if they want to send a 70+% shooter to the line, I don't know why I should complain.
  • Ramon Harris really struggled, and all his injury time has clearly hurt him.
  • Perry Stevenson was as good as he gets.  I wish he hadn't missed the front end of that one and one, but demands for perfection are foolish.
  • What can I say about how we dominated the glass?  Except for one weird sequence in the second half where we allowed Louisville about 4 offensive rebounds in one possession, we were awesome.  We outrebounded the Cards on both ends of the floor by significant margins.
  • Liggins was OK.  I think Gillispie made a tactical error, with 20/20 hindsight, not having him on Sosa at the end.  But honestly, I thought Gillispie was really great.  He made adjustments throughout the game, and did a masterful job of orchestrating our comeback in the second half.
  • Leaving Terrence Williams open from three is never a bad strategy, as he simply can't turn down that shot and never has shot it well.  But he did today.
  • Josh Harrellson tried, but he was out-athleted.  I thought AJ Stewart did a nice job, and gave us some good minutes and two very big free throws.
  • What the hell was that technical for?  Inquiring minds want to know.

That's all I have for now.  I'll probably be back to normal in a few hours.

Comment 123 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

For the 4th game this year...

…Turnovers cost us a game, IMO, and that has got to change…

Steelers fan 1st! UK is my 2nd love.

by vinceuk1 on Jan 4, 2009 7:33 PM EST reply actions  

It will, but it will take time.

That’s just a fact.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Jan 4, 2009 7:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Well ...

 … maybe not a fact, exactly, but an opinion I feel strongly about. :-)

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Jan 4, 2009 7:36 PM EST up reply actions  

We have improved considerably ...

… from the 28 we had earlier. Look at the bright side. :-)

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Jan 4, 2009 7:37 PM EST up reply actions  

I guess, but...

…I had totally blocked the VMI game out of my mind… Totally… lol

Steelers fan 1st! UK is my 2nd love.

by vinceuk1 on Jan 4, 2009 7:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Actually ...

… I think that was K state.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Jan 4, 2009 7:40 PM EST up reply actions  

i thought we hit 30

TOs against K State…

GO BIG BLUE!! GO BIG BLUE!!

by UKWildCatFanatic on Jan 4, 2009 7:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Boxscore Numbers Very Similar

U of L hit a few more 3-pointers than UK.

That was the difference. All the other # were pretty much the same.

by FortyYearCatFan on Jan 4, 2009 7:37 PM EST reply actions  

Not rebounding. :-)

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Jan 4, 2009 7:37 PM EST up reply actions  

29 UK, 22 U of L

Slight edge there.

But U of L won by hitting their 3-pointers today.

by FortyYearCatFan on Jan 4, 2009 7:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Forty

If it’s possible to lose a game in the first half, that’s what UK did today. Slow start, turnovers, and feloniously bad three-point defense is why UK lost, in my opinion.

by Ken Howlett on Jan 4, 2009 11:29 PM EST up reply actions  

I have always heard PGA Tour players say....

You can’t win a tournament on the first day, but you sure can lose it.

by StillCatwoman on Jan 5, 2009 12:08 AM EST up reply actions  

but I will say,

when we got to half time only 3 down, I had high hopes. All we had to do is make up 4 shots before the eighteenth on the final round and we had ’em.

by StillCatwoman on Jan 5, 2009 12:37 AM EST up reply actions  

Anyone know why BCG got T'd..?

…if you hear, please post…

Steelers fan 1st! UK is my 2nd love.

by vinceuk1 on Jan 4, 2009 7:41 PM EST reply actions  

No Excuses

UofL had homecourt,and better players.Cats played well,and Porter getting burned on the last shot is really no shocker.

by -Zoso- on Jan 4, 2009 7:45 PM EST reply actions  

Disagree with Porter being burned...

…I would rather Sosa shoot a 30 footer then a 12-15 footer… If Porter would have been up on him, he would have left him in his dust, so I’ll take that 30 footer every time…

Steelers fan 1st! UK is my 2nd love.

by vinceuk1 on Jan 4, 2009 7:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Sure

but Porter played off his man,thus giving up the shot.

by -Zoso- on Jan 4, 2009 7:51 PM EST up reply actions  

I'd play off a man shooting 20% from 3...

as well as a player who is faster than I am.

He played it fine. That was a bad shot by Sosa. It just went in.

by BBallSophist on Jan 4, 2009 8:45 PM EST up reply actions  

No kidding

Porter did the right thing. If the guy wants to take a 30 foot jump shot, go ahead and may God be with you. If he plays right up on him, he probably gets burned for a much higher percentage shot. The 30 footer isn’t going in the majority of the time, I don’t blame Porter for the loss. Mostly I blame turnovers, which Porter, ironically, did not have.

by bigbluestu on Jan 4, 2009 11:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah.

I mean, Jeez, that was a 23 foot jumper he made. That’s just the kind of shot you want him to take, not a floater or pull-up in the lane. The guy has made 5 three-pointers all year including that one.

It was a great shot, but the defense was fine. I wish Porter were 6’5", but he’s not, and if he had challenged the shot he may have fouled him. I’d rather Sosa chuck a 23 footer from the top of the key than shoot 3 from 15 feet.

It just isn’t that difficult to figure.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Jan 4, 2009 11:10 PM EST up reply actions  

I think G is right about Porter "guarding" Sosa

I would have layed off until about 5-6 seconds then pressured, which could possible have forced him to turned the ball over or force a bad shot.

But that play didn’t lose the game.

One thing nobody is talking about is the fact that Meeks didn’t kill any clock, when he had the chance to. But, again, that’s not why UK lost.

by Ken Howlett on Jan 4, 2009 11:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Can someone nail down how long that shot was?

I’ve heard 23 feet, 25 feet, 28 feet, and 30 feet.

by blbskue on Jan 5, 2009 7:58 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah ...

… I place it at 25 or 26 feet. I’m positive it wasn’t thirty, but it was more than 24.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Jan 5, 2009 8:13 AM EST up reply actions  

Agreed

There’s plenty of places to point to in the game and say “We should have done this different” but that last play was not one of them. A 30 ft heave at the last second smacks of desperation and that’s what it was. If I was Pitino, I’d be pissed that Sosa didn’ try to drive and get the foul for a better chance at the win.

But that’s how the ball bounces.

Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."

by chirop1 on Jan 5, 2009 9:12 AM EST up reply actions  

I'm with Vince here

I threw my hands up anticipating OT when Sosa just stood there.

by GoLightning on Jan 4, 2009 7:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Porter...

played off his man expecting (like everyone else I would think) that the cards would be running a pick and roll. I don’t really think he can be blamed on this one, all in all I felt he really played a hell of a game.

Sosa really made a great shot , period.

by wldcatsfreak on Jan 4, 2009 10:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed. Just a great shot.

No taking away from Porter or anything else. Great, clutch shot.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Jan 4, 2009 10:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Apparently ...

… the T was for complaining about a non-call on a Patterson basket, according to Matt May at The Cats Pause

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Jan 4, 2009 7:48 PM EST reply actions  

and yet...

…traitor Rick can run half way on the court bitching, and nothings called…

Steelers fan 1st! UK is my 2nd love.

by vinceuk1 on Jan 4, 2009 8:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Technically the coaches are not supposed to leave the box unless a player is hurt ...

… but what has evolved over the years is that they are allowed to leave the box if they are instructing their team.

Gillispie was on the floor, during play, standing next to an official, while coaching, and the official genlty nudged him back onto the sideline. That happened only a few minutes after he was T’ed up.

As I have stated several times now, and why folks don’t understand this I don’t know, but G more than likely used inappropirate language directed toward an official, which resulted in his T. This isn’t new or unique, it happens often.

by Ken Howlett on Jan 4, 2009 11:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Weak

Couldnt have been too awful bad of a complaint if no one could even point out what the techincal was for. I dont really think we can blame the 12 run on Gillispie.

by kentuckygirl0724 on Jan 4, 2009 8:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Wow

I’m stunned

"That's not a Sherman tank, it's Frank Thomas!" - Monkeyball

by JLeverenz on Jan 4, 2009 7:50 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm happy..!

Steelers fan 1st! UK is my 2nd love.

by vinceuk1 on Jan 4, 2009 7:51 PM EST up reply actions  

I wasn't a big Porter fan to say the least early on this year....

But he’s earning my heart more and more every game. This kid exemplifies what UK basketball is all about. Never quitting no matter what, and always gives 100%. What a shot he made there at the end of the game. Hell of a game Michael Porter. Tru give me a glass of that Porter Kool Aid. Go Big Blue, and let’s bring on the SEC!

gobigbluecatsfan72

by gobigbluecatsfan72 on Jan 4, 2009 7:50 PM EST reply actions  

Count me in too.

I was a Porter supporter, then a detractor. Now I’m leaning back in favor of him. The kid’s got balls to have gone through what he’s been through this season and still show up to play. Better sign me up for a glass of Kool Aid too Tru.

by bigbluestu on Jan 4, 2009 11:07 PM EST up reply actions  

I can relate.

The guy really showed me a lot tonight, and I expected him to fold like a 10-high poker hand. But he didn’t.

I don’t know if he will continue to play well, but he played well tonight, and I have been saying for a while, rather loudly in fact, that if he could handle a game like this, he would win me over. Well, he did, and he did.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Jan 4, 2009 11:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed about Porter

I think the bottom line is that Liggins is obviously a more talented player with a MUCH MUCH higher ceiling, but he hasn’t been playing great the past few games, and has a LONG way to go before he can be steady and reliable. He makes freshman mistakes, and that’s okay. Crawford comes to mind when thinking about a freshman that struggles, but eventually comes into his own. Liggins will get there – he’s just too talented not to.

Porter has improved his decision making and ball handling enough to be that steady player we need in there most of the time. I’d like to see Liggins get there this season, but it may not happen. Hopefully by next season Liggins and Miller both have matured.

by blbskue on Jan 5, 2009 8:02 AM EST up reply actions  

Learn and move on

It’s time to get into SEC play and it should be very exciting (on the plus side).

by hoboat33 on Jan 4, 2009 7:52 PM EST reply actions  

12-4, Maybe 14-2

23-8 good, 25-6 better.

I still 25 W or more on Selection Sunday.

by FortyYearCatFan on Jan 4, 2009 7:59 PM EST up reply actions  

I'll give you props for picking the spread as three points...

and hope your right once more predicting the 25W

Two months (!). Two weeks. Two pencils.

by Thomas Hunt Morgan on Jan 4, 2009 8:03 PM EST up reply actions  

For some reason this game makes me optimistic

After watching other SEC teams, I honestly could see us going 15-1 in the SEC. It’s a long shot, but the only game that worries me is at Tennessee. I don’t have much concern about at Florida. Arkansas worries me as much as any other SEC team.

by blbskue on Jan 5, 2009 8:04 AM EST up reply actions  

My SEC prediction

Is a loss on the road at Arkansas (If they can get up to take down an undefeated Oklahoma… I think Pelphry will have them ready for the Cats), split with Tennessee, and a loss in some random game that I’m unable to pinpoint at this time. 13-3. SEC Champs or tie with UT.

Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."

by chirop1 on Jan 5, 2009 9:18 AM EST up reply actions  

A Damn Good College BB Game

Tru,
Don’t know why, but I am more encouraged than discouraged. We played them even up in the second half. Anyone who saw them against UNLV on that same court only a few days ago would NEVER believe that team could beat us with frees and threes. We will win some games this season the same way we lost this one today. We can build on this bigtime, IMO.
Both coaches did an excellent job, both teams played solid D and not one Wildcat failed to leave it all on the hardwood. The technical certainly hurt as we had some “mo” and they ran off 12 unanswered immediately following it. Pretty strange that NO ONE knew what transpired. But, that didn’t lose the game.
The birdies just barely got away with their Hack a Cat plan.
Our Cats were valiant. Our plan was solid and our execution, especially in the second half was stellar. We are going to have turnovers. But Porter manned up again. I am officially off his case. Liggins and Galloway will improve once they work things out with their coach the way Crawford did last season. As for Darius, the general rule is that freshmen will be freshmen. He will come around and probably sooner than later.
Kellogg called a fair and very intelligent game. Good riddance, Billy Pecker.
I am proud of these Wildcat warriors.
I couldn’t have asked for more than they gave out there this afternoon.
GO CATS!

by ukfastcat on Jan 4, 2009 7:55 PM EST reply actions  

Porter manned up?

They ran past him, through him and around him. Yeah I give Porter an A for hustle but he is clearly a liability against top notch competition. One great shot – a blind squirrel will find a acorn every now and then.

by MyBloodRunsBlue on Jan 4, 2009 8:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Good points, all.

I just hate to lose, and I am in, “hate to lose” mode right now. I’ll be more rational later.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Jan 4, 2009 10:20 PM EST up reply actions  

I Totally Agree

I think everyone played so well.! I am pulling for you CATS. I know you are all going to improve. No one lost anything today. UL won it by shooting the lights out. I see so much upside for these guys. I wish I could just tell you Great job! And keep getting better because you have so many things you can accomplish this year. Keep your heads up CATS! Again, tough loss but you played with a lot of heart. I am proud of my team!

by LyricSmith on Jan 5, 2009 12:18 AM EST up reply actions  

A Porter believer?

You are kidding right? He proved again that against top competition he just doesn’t belong. Sure I would play him against Austin Peay, but againt UL he was way over matched, he made numerous weak passes that led to turnovers (how he didn’t get credit for 3 or 4 is beyond me) and I think he only had one assist. He was not terrifc and it is sad the UK had to play him 30 minutes.

by MyBloodRunsBlue on Jan 4, 2009 8:14 PM EST reply actions  

I'm not kidding at all.

He earned the right through deeds. Potential be damned, Porter has earned my respect, and my support. I don’t know what game you were watching, but it wasn’t this one.

Give credit where it is due.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Jan 4, 2009 10:22 PM EST up reply actions  

However..

what a fantastic game. This game shows UK is a top 25 team and that UL is a very good basketball team. It is disappointing that UK does not have another scoring option or this team would be very good.. UK has two AllAmericans in Meeks and Patterson.

by MyBloodRunsBlue on Jan 4, 2009 8:17 PM EST reply actions  

Who was guarding Sosa?

And I don’t mean on the last play but the majority of the game,

Slower Traffic Keep Right!

by SevenRings on Jan 4, 2009 8:19 PM EST reply actions  

Yeah

but he is the only one that I could definitely identify as “guarding” Sosa.

by kentuckygirl0724 on Jan 4, 2009 8:24 PM EST up reply actions  

LOL kentuckygirl!

This pro-con Porter debate is becoming comical.

Yes, he had zero turnovers (very good), but also had only one assist (not good). The primary reason for both of those stats is the fact that Meeks iniated the offense for much of the game.

For anyone to deny that the kid has improved light-years over the last year is baffling to me. But that does’t mean that he’s a great player. It just means that he has gotten better; he’s gone from a serious liability to a serviceable player. I, like his coach and everyone else, expects him to continue to improve.

With all the talk of turnovers (Meeks’ 6 especially) no one has brought up the point that Stevenson’s TO with1:25 was the miscue that hurt UK’s chances the most. Why he was receiving the inbounds pass is something that I would like explained, and why he can’t catch, and hold onto a ball in those giant hands of his will forever remain a mystery.

The bottom line is that this team does not value possession. And until they do, close losses and disappointment will be the prevailing law of the Bluegrass.

But on the other hand, I saw an extremely resilient team today. A team that will not quit; a team that can take a punch. In that respect I think they mirror their coach. But they absolutely must find another reliable, consistent scorer. Meeks and Patterson cannot consistently beat good teams by themselves. At least they haven’t thus far.

by Ken Howlett on Jan 4, 2009 11:55 PM EST up reply actions  

My recollection was ...

… that Stevenson was throwing the inbounds pass, and Ramon Harris somehow missed that fact and let the ball get past him.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Jan 5, 2009 6:51 AM EST up reply actions  

Your recollection is correct.

Don’t ask me why I wrote what I wrote: Maybe the tornado of emotions swirling around in my head.

I realized my mistake after reading J. Clay’s post-gme column.

My comment about Perry’s sometimes slick hands stands, though :)

by Ken Howlett on Jan 5, 2009 8:57 AM EST up reply actions  

We need

someone that can CONSISTENTLY be counted on to sink the three. The three point shot is crucial for so many reasons! It can close a gap in a game that may be running away. It can get a home crowd fired up or silence a rivals’ fans – both of which are HUGe momentum changers. Momentum alone NEEDS a three point shooter.

by kentuckygirl0724 on Jan 4, 2009 8:20 PM EST reply actions  

the Momemtum buster T?

I immediately wound the tape back on the DVR and all CBC did was make two VERY adamant gestures to the official under the basket that PPat got hammered on the put back. He wasnt out of the coaching box, and didn’t look like anything out of the ordinary, just asking for the call, then, Bang. T’d up. The assistants went crazy. Definitely rabbit ears by the ref, but clearly a massive break in the momentum the team had.

anyone hear if CBC addressed it in his presser?

by pattyscats on Jan 4, 2009 8:20 PM EST reply actions  

That's what I thought

That techincal was crap. Plain and simple. Crap.

by kentuckygirl0724 on Jan 4, 2009 8:22 PM EST up reply actions  

missing in all the disappointment...

…Meeks hit 2 huge free throws with ice in his vains to tie it at 71-71…

Meeks is a stud, and I wish he would start getting his due nationally…

Steelers fan 1st! UK is my 2nd love.

by vinceuk1 on Jan 4, 2009 8:22 PM EST reply actions  

Turnovers killed us

but the team played through them. They shot the ball great, and in the 2nd half got the ball to Patterson and he was a beast. By the time SEC tourney time rolls around, this team will be tough to beat. Porter is playing much better, but having another ball handler on the court with him like Liggins or Galloway will open up the offense even more. I hope that happens throughout SEC play. A lot of positives can be taken from this game.

That's what she said.

by adaircam4 on Jan 4, 2009 8:32 PM EST reply actions  

However,

despite the liability that is Porter, what a great game. Fun to watch, an exciting ending, our two stars showed they are dominate players. I despise any loss, but this is one loss I think this team will use to build confidence. I can see UK winning the SEC so long as Meeks and PP stay healthy. This is the weakest the SEC has been in recent memory.

by MyBloodRunsBlue on Jan 4, 2009 8:42 PM EST reply actions  

You are getting perilously close to Porter bashing.

I think you’ve said enough.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Jan 4, 2009 10:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Porter

Some of you conveniently forget that he was signed as a TWO and slated to be a BACK UP two at that.
It isn’t the young man’s fault that he doesn’t have the talent of the elite PGs in the nation.
All I am saying is I agree that he is not an SEC caliber starting guard, but he is out there (and apparently doing the same every practice) giving it 100% all the time.
I dogged him hard last season and early this year.
But, #1 he is a Wildcat and #2 he is improving markedly.
I would hope by the middle of the SEC that Liggins and Galloway “get it” and Michael can be a dependable sub for them.
I do know that as one of his critics, I admit he deserves more respect.
We are rarely going to see full court pressure D like that again all season and MP stuck his nose in and competed.
That’s all I am asking of any of our improving players.

by ukfastcat on Jan 4, 2009 8:48 PM EST reply actions  

This is Team play you guys...

Not just Pat and Jodie. I love Porter’s maturation into someone who can lead the Team when needed. Liggins and Galloway are not there yet but they are improving. Geez I am very disappointed in MyBloodRunsBlue comments here.

by kykat51 on Jan 4, 2009 8:49 PM EST reply actions  

Blood runs blue

kykat51,

I think his nose runs blue, too.
Some fans want to see the glass half empty.
To me, today’s effort in that hostile environment proves it is half full.
ELITE 8 OR BUST!

by ukfastcat on Jan 4, 2009 8:52 PM EST up reply actions  

my glass overflows..

I am very proud of UK.. today’s game was fantastic. UK played very well and UL played a great game. If Meeks and PP stay healthy I believe UK will win the SEC.

by MyBloodRunsBlue on Jan 4, 2009 9:08 PM EST up reply actions  

What more can you ask?

From Porter? No TO’s and some 3 pointers and gutsy defense?

by kykat51 on Jan 4, 2009 9:06 PM EST up reply actions  

I disagree

We only lost by 3 today! Who would you have put in there in place of Porter to get the same results or a win?

by kykat51 on Jan 4, 2009 9:13 PM EST up reply actions  

This team is going

to turn the ball over against good defenses. We have to get ovet that. We rebound well enough to offset those. We will probably average about 15 TO a game by the end of the year. Porter not having an official turnover is large. Meeks plays very hard and he is a scorer. He drives against three defenders on the fast break very well but wants to lunge in the half court offense against the big timber. If Meeks starts kicking that ball out just a few more times with Porter and Perry getting a couple more shots a game than it will open it up more for everybody. Yes I am now convinced that Porter is the sarter at the point. He seems to be feeling more comfortable on his shot. His history says he can shoot some. He protected the ball against a very good defense and that is his job. Liggins will get plenty of minutes a game to improve but he would have to improve quite considerably to start in front of Porter now. I was a BIG critic of Porter but he seems to be getting the picture much better. I personally thought Porter had hit his ceiling and I was wrong.

by Grasslands1 on Jan 4, 2009 9:01 PM EST reply actions  

Yes it is

Ken. This team is going to be very deep next year.

by Grasslands1 on Jan 4, 2009 9:02 PM EST reply actions  

This is how ignorant the Porter defense is..

Meeks averages 32.3 minutes a game and 2.9 TOs per game or 0.0898 TOs for every minute played. Porter averags 21.4 minutes per game and 2.4 TOs or 0.1121 per every minute played. Porter turns the ball over 25% more than Meeks. This is a stat that doesn’t lie, case closed…

by MyBloodRunsBlue on Jan 4, 2009 9:03 PM EST reply actions  

I agree fastcat

I was very encouraged by the improvement from last year to this year. I can see Liggins and Galloway improving and Miller during SEC play. Porter right now is only in the PG position because he has been put there for lack of maturation by Liggins and Galloway. I loved Porter’s 3’s today and his control of the game overall. What more can one ask from someone who is NOT a natural point? Especially against UL?

by kykat51 on Jan 4, 2009 9:03 PM EST reply actions  

We have eleven

players that can get minutes on this years team and at least two that are going to get playing time next year out of the gate.

by Grasslands1 on Jan 4, 2009 9:06 PM EST reply actions  

Patrick P. has

a beautiful basketball game. He is just a dream to watch. If he stays, watch out. We will be stong either way but with him here next year, we will all be in a frenzy.

by Grasslands1 on Jan 4, 2009 9:09 PM EST reply actions  

There is somethign else to consider.

what if Meeks and PP jump ship? That is a scenario I would hate to see.

by MyBloodRunsBlue on Jan 4, 2009 9:11 PM EST up reply actions  

I think Patterson is definitely gone

…. but I do think Meeks will return for his senior season.

Meeks has to improve his ball handling and decision making. He also needs to work at creating his own shot.

by OGETARTS on Jan 4, 2009 10:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Hood can shoot.

We won’t be final four though.

by Grasslands1 on Jan 4, 2009 9:15 PM EST reply actions  

I hope they both stay.

I think we need them both to go higher.

by kykat51 on Jan 4, 2009 9:19 PM EST reply actions  

I would love that..

and UK would be a preseason Final Four pick for me.

by MyBloodRunsBlue on Jan 4, 2009 9:21 PM EST up reply actions  

We certainly do

kykat51. Meeks needs to stay another year and work on distributing the ball a little better and that will help him cut down on his turnovers. He can disapear on defense but I think that is caused from being tired. He plays very hard and that is tiring.

by Grasslands1 on Jan 4, 2009 9:24 PM EST reply actions  

We will do very

well in the SEC barring injury to Patterson, Meeks, Stevenson, and Porter. BG has his rotation and this team looks ready. They lost today only because U of L got hot from 3 and the free throw line. All other stats showed victory.

by Grasslands1 on Jan 4, 2009 9:29 PM EST reply actions  

and...

…If it goes to OT, I liked our changes… Clark had fouled out, Super Sam & Goode both had 4…

Steelers fan 1st! UK is my 2nd love.

by vinceuk1 on Jan 4, 2009 9:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Was it

the turning point for our guys? That guys is the number one question and should be addressed. Now I know we have won alot of games, and easy ones at that but are we at the turning point to turn Kentucky back to promised land. Can we make a strong SEC run? Can we get a four or better seed in the tourney and make a run for the title?

by tenken on Jan 4, 2009 9:39 PM EST reply actions  

hummm..."

Turning point..? Maybe
SEC run..? yea, I think
4th or better seed…nope
title run..? Not this year, but next..!!

Steelers fan 1st! UK is my 2nd love.

by vinceuk1 on Jan 4, 2009 9:42 PM EST up reply actions  

We can but the

ball must be distributed just a little better. We want Meeks shooting but if he and Patrick just kick it out a little more and the guys can score and stats do say that Perry and Porter can shoot we could get dangerous. We can’t go to the tournament with just two scorers.

by Grasslands1 on Jan 4, 2009 9:48 PM EST up reply actions  

BG technical was probably

dirty words while he was discussing the play with the refs. The timing was actually fine considering we just scored. A free throw and that’s it and just bad timing for U of L to score 12 staight.

by Grasslands1 on Jan 4, 2009 9:41 PM EST reply actions  

My thoughts on the game

Man, what a game! It sucks to lose, but I;m proud of the Cats effort and I thought they showed a lot of heart today. We still turned the ball over too much, especially early, but I was really pleased with Porter. He had 0 turnovers for the entire game. That’s a big, big improvement. I also thought Harris and Miller did a good job of bringing the ball up at times AND they didn’t make any stupid passes.

Patterson was simply unstoppable out there. I was really impressed with his effort and his play inside. He was the best player on the court. I would be shocked if returns for another season at UK. He’s just too talented and his NBA stock is on the rise.

Meeks was excellent for most of the game, but I was disappointed with his turnovers. He’s got to work hard to improve on that.

I was disappointed with Liggins. I thought he struggled when he was out there….

What did Gillispie get his technical for? Did anyone hear?

I thought Gillispie coached a great game! I was impressed with his decisions, his game plan, his adjustments and he used timeouts at the right times. It was one of the best games I’ve seen him coach at UK.

I was OK with Sosa taking that last shot. It was a long three (30-footer) and he’s a very inconsistent shooter. He’s gonna miss more then he makes. He just got lucky and hit a big time shot. Unfortunately, that happens sometimes.

GBB!!!

by OGETARTS on Jan 4, 2009 9:58 PM EST reply actions  

Okay all you guys that know basketball or have played the game

oldcat"69 has a new fanpost up. Where have all the “players” gone?

Is it because of the change in basketball since the Rupp era? I really want to hear your comments on that post. I am a lady as you all know, so I cannot really give an intelligent answer to his question.

by kykat51 on Jan 4, 2009 10:04 PM EST reply actions  

wait, you're being sarcastic, right, kykat?

I know you do not really think we ladies can’t know our basketball : )

by blue kentucky girl on Jan 4, 2009 10:19 PM EST up reply actions  

U of L picked up 2 commitments tonight

From Jody Demling:

Not long after the win over Kentucky, Louisville received commitments from two of the top sophomores in the country – Ryan Taylor and Michael Chandler.

Both attend Indianapolis Lawrence North and committed after the game.

by OGETARTS on Jan 4, 2009 10:24 PM EST reply actions  

Who cares?

We can’t control what they do. Only what we do. :-)

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Jan 4, 2009 11:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Kentucky was recruiting both players

Taylor took a visit to UK for Midnight Madness with Jon Hood, Daniel Orton, Russell Byrd and others.

Kinda surprised they pulled the trigger so early.

by OGETARTS on Jan 5, 2009 6:52 AM EST up reply actions  

One thing

I liked about what Pitino said was that this is the kind of game that UofL and Uof K should be. It honestly hasn’t been much a rivarly lately with one team or the other blowing each other out of the water. Yes we have the occasional good game but not like this-ya we fans know the bad blood but not the players. It was a credit to the rivalry. As bad as I was hating it…….you could see it in Sosa’s chants “this is our house”. That is the stuff of rivalries. I love it. I think UofL has lost its luster……..I think today was the primer for more to come.

by tenken on Jan 5, 2009 12:23 AM EST up reply actions  

UofL has lost its luster?????

How so? From what I have seen at this point the only reason that UofL was a preseason #3 was only because of ‘luster’.

'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'

by HozeKing on Jan 5, 2009 11:04 AM EST up reply actions  

Can someone

who isn’t as lazy as me take away our threes and their threes and tell me who wins this game? I would like to know what the score is.

by tenken on Jan 4, 2009 10:26 PM EST reply actions  

well I'm pretty lazy but...

we went 6-16, they were 11-20 (11-20, wtf??) My math is pathetic, truly, but if you just subtracted those points, that’d be…53-41, Cats, right? It’s hard to believe this game truly could have gone either way considering their numbers from “treyville”—thanks Mike Pratt.

by blue kentucky girl on Jan 4, 2009 11:28 PM EST up reply actions  

thanks for that

I just kept hearing how their three point beat us. Just wanted to be sure :)

by tenken on Jan 5, 2009 12:15 AM EST up reply actions  

The game of basketball and players

Has changed since Rupp, Wooden, Dean Smith. .. so says 40yr over there. I cannot relate to that as I was too busy rearing kids. It’s just not the same as far as players being able to do a multitude of things. That is his question.

by kykat51 on Jan 4, 2009 10:31 PM EST reply actions  

Well...

I’m sitting here reading everyone’s post and not really sure what to make of the anti Micheal Porter sentimate that’s being floated around. In my humble opinion when your starting point guard goes 33 minutes against what should widely be considered the toughest full court pressure we are going to see this year and has ZERO turnovers I’d say he had a pretty good game.

Just a thought but how about focusing instead on Patrick Patterson being a complete and total one man wrecking crew. That guy was simply amazing tonight and it was obvious that the cards had absolutely no answer for him.

 Or if that ‘s not focus worthy, let’s talk about Perry Stevenson really showing that he is one of the best glue guys in the SEC if not the entire country…..need a big block, Perrys your guy…..how about hitting a mid range jumper (or a three) well Perrys gets ya that too….oh, and the guy can pass as well.

Then there’s Meeks, while I admit I tend to get a little frustrated with his forced shots and would like to see him both pass a bit more and cut down on the turnovers, he is nothing short of phenomenal at times. He as much as ANYONE on the team can take over a game on the offensive end. Jody is a great shooter and defenses have to be aware of him at all times.

No, instead of praising UK for playing a top 25 team even up in their house, let’s sit back and bash one kid and just lay the blame for the loss at his feet. Good idea!

Let’s face it, UK lost a heartbreaker. I for one want to puke when we lose to anyone but especially to those guys (oh, and florida, tenn, unc, duke, anyone in the SEC, pac-10, all the bigs (10, 12 and east), or a mid major.) To make my point crystal clear I freaking HATE when we lose but knocking one kid for it when they all gave maximum effort and fell one improbable shot short of sending the game into OT and having all the momentumn just doesn’t fly.

by wldcatsfreak on Jan 4, 2009 11:01 PM EST reply actions  

Nice comments.

We should really just relax. I was impressed by Porter’s play, but I can appreciate that others were less so. That’s fair.

Patterson played his best overall game this year, taking competition quality into consideration. Meeks played well also, and we did ourselves a lot of good by proving that we are worthy of any competition at this point in the season.

U of L played just the tiniest bit better, and they won the game. They deserved it, they played hard and made big shots at the right time. That cannot be undone.

There is no blame for this loss. Sosa hit a big shot at the end of the game to win. It happens all the time. Based on his percentages, he was lucky to draw iron, but he made a 23 foot shot with the game on the line. Outstanding, but nobody’s fault. That’s just the kind of shot I would have wanted them to take in that situation, it just went in.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Jan 4, 2009 11:07 PM EST up reply actions  

It will take

more then a few games to erase what Porter had done previous games. I will say that he lost several games for us. Or was an important factor in that. BUT, without his presence we would have lost today by alot and a few other games. He has really stepped up. Big Blue Nation is emotional though. He keeps this up and all will be forgiven. We have short memories for the most part! Just look at how much we fell in love with Bradley and Crawford. Never thought I would have tears in my eyes for them as they played their last game.

by tenken on Jan 5, 2009 12:19 AM EST up reply actions  

one player can not win or loose a game...

it takes a team to do both…

Steelers fan 1st! UK is my 2nd love.

by vinceuk1 on Jan 5, 2009 8:07 AM EST up reply actions  

notice

I said important factor………

by tenken on Jan 5, 2009 9:07 AM EST up reply actions  

"I will say that he lost several games for us"

Well… I suppose the obvious question should be “What do you define ‘several’ as?”

I would think 5 or more… but we haven’t lost 5 games.

So are we saying he has lost 4 games for us? I don’t think anyone (except maybe MyBloodRunsBlue) would argue that he lost yesterday’s game for us.

So are we saying he has lost 3 games for us? I really don’t think I would pin the complete and utter collapse against UNC on Porter.

So are we saying he has lost 2 games for us? Miami was a tough loss. But again… there was a lot going on there and I think Porter did just as well as anyone else in that debacle.

So are we saying that he lost 1 game for us? VMI? Really? You want to pin the track meet on Porter?

So now we’re down to no losses that I can realistically say “Porter cost us.” A far cry from “several.”

Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."

by chirop1 on Jan 5, 2009 9:56 AM EST up reply actions  

Porter didn't lose the game for UK

UL was simply one shot better yesterday. All I am saying is that Porter is a liability against top notch competition. He has proven it time and time again. He plays hard and I am sure he is a good kid, but UK needs better starting talent than that to reach the Final Four.

by MyBloodRunsBlue on Jan 5, 2009 10:43 AM EST up reply actions  

Agreed

But can you point to someone on this year’s team that can get the job done? I can’t.

So wish in one hand, shit in the other and see which one fills up first. (Pardon my language.)

Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."

by chirop1 on Jan 5, 2009 10:49 AM EST up reply actions  

i

was talking about over the span of his career here……I like Porter. Not bashing him just making the point that for many Ky fans it will just take time to erase those memories. Once again I said IMPORTANT FACTOR!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by tenken on Jan 5, 2009 11:07 AM EST up reply actions  

You really need to unburden yourself
I for one want to puke when we lose to anyone but especially to those guys (oh, and florida, tenn, unc, duke, anyone in the SEC, pac-10, all the bigs (10, 12 and east), or a mid major.)

.

Sometime’s you just need to recognize that there are good teams that play hard and are supported by good fans. It’s good for ones perspective and health.

'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'

by HozeKing on Jan 5, 2009 11:07 AM EST up reply actions  

My perspective and health are just fine....

and I’ll continue to be nauseated by losses to certain teams whenever I want thank you very much. Your concern is however very touching.

by wldcatsfreak on Jan 6, 2009 10:47 AM EST up reply actions  

Shot clock and 3 Point Shot

I imagine have drastically changed the game Rupp, Wooden, and earlier Smith. That plus teh growth of AAU/year-round ball and the amount of money now involved in the game. There is bound to be big differences

by GoLightning on Jan 4, 2009 11:01 PM EST reply actions  

I hate losing too..

but am fully encouraged. I had nightmares last night that Louisville put together a patented Pitino game of gun and run and we lost by 24 in a game that was never a game.

Instead, we played pretty good. Hit some shots against some great defense. Did not get flustered by the press. If it had not been for some absolutely silly turnovers and a guy hitting a 25 footer that he should not have even shot, we win.

So, good effort on the road to against a dangerous team that was smarting from recent losses and arguably needed this more than us.

Xbox Live Gamertag: hoopchi

by hoopchi on Jan 4, 2009 11:17 PM EST reply actions  

hoopchi

I think that we needed this win too. More so than they did. We have to just hope that Kansas State does well and West Virginia does well in the Big East. Also hope that VMI,Miami and of course the Cards do well. Most of these SEC teams will be fighting for their lives every game. Most everyone has done poorly OOC. Arkansas probably has done the best with that big Okie win. Tennessee better win against the Zags. We need Arkansas to beat Texas on Tuesday as well. Honestly I see a more talented team then in 2003 when we went undefeated in the SEC. I know I will get raked over the coals for that statement so just bring it on. Wait let me rephrase that……..I feel that we have more potential then that team. We have the inside presence in PP that we didn’t have then. Meeks is our Bogans. Then all the rest have great potential. I honestly felt that the announcers were impressed by us today. Yall I haven’t seen that IN A LONG TIME!!!

by tenken on Jan 5, 2009 12:13 AM EST reply actions  

Meeks is our Bogans

I’ll take Meeks offense over Bogans offense every day… but I’ll take Bogans’ defense and ball handling as a trump card and take Bogans (as a senior) over Meeks (as a Junior).

There is no comparison for Patterson, but I’d take a freshman Kelenna Azuibuike, and the experienced Gerald Fitch, Chuck Hayes, Erik Daniels, Cliff Hawkins, and Marquis Estill over their rough counterparts.

Give me the 2003 team. I’m still convinced that a sprained ankle cost them a real shot at a title that year. And potentially changed the future of the NBA. What if Bogans had been healthy enough to hold Dwayne Wade to a pedestrian 18 points or so in that game? Would he have gone high enough to be drafted by Miami? Would he then have become a superstar alongside Shaq in his early career? So many things that can change because of a swollen deltoid ligament in the ankle of a 22 year old basketball player.

Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."

by chirop1 on Jan 5, 2009 10:03 AM EST up reply actions  

I think Wade's success has been proven and validated at this point.

It wasn’t the result of an ‘injury gift’.

'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'

by HozeKing on Jan 5, 2009 11:09 AM EST up reply actions  

No, but ...

… it seems likely, although academic, that an uninjured Bogans would have had some positive impact on the defense of Wade from a UK standpoint— he was a very good defender when healthy.

Whether or not that would have mattered with respect to the ultimate outcome is certainly debatable.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Jan 5, 2009 11:28 AM EST up reply actions  

Maybe... Maybe not

I agree that he has come back from his injury strong this year and deserves all the accolades he gets. But would he have been in a position to receive those accolades if Marquette doesn’t make the Final Four that year? The world may never know.

Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."

by chirop1 on Jan 5, 2009 11:30 AM EST up reply actions  

Yes

Wade was very well known to NBA scouts prior to (and certainly after) FF in 2003.

But he was 2nd team All-State as HS senior. Hard to imagine 5 better players in Illinois then.

by FortyYearCatFan on Jan 5, 2009 12:21 PM EST up reply actions  

I just haven't seen

…Bogans shut down or affect Wade any during any NBA game.

'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'

by HozeKing on Jan 5, 2009 12:31 PM EST up reply actions  

That's a different game and a different Wade/Bogans.

You can’t compare the two.

But in reality, Bogans wasn’t likely to shut him down, anyway, but he could have defended him way better and likely stopped him some of the time. Who knows, it might have been enough.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Jan 5, 2009 3:11 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm just glad "Mybloodrunsblue" is apparently done posting tonight....

I admitted I wasn’t a Porter fan in the beginning, but I can see us riding him to an SEC championship. I can’t wait until Liggins and Galloway are ready to step in full time, but that time is not now. Michael Porter is becoming more and more comfortable with the ball in his hands, and he played a hell of a game today. How ‘bout his clutch 3’s? This team is going to finish strong, and I see us making a run in the big dance! Go Big Blue, and I agree w/hoopchi, it was good to see Kellogg giving UK some props today!

gobigbluecatsfan72

by gobigbluecatsfan72 on Jan 5, 2009 12:32 AM EST reply actions  

Ride Porter to an SEC championship??/

You are kidding right? Please replace “Porter” with “Meeks” or “Patterson.” EKU couldnt ride Porter to an OVC champsionship.

by MyBloodRunsBlue on Jan 5, 2009 10:38 AM EST up reply actions  

I am Proud of my team.

Correct me if I am wrong, but should we not be supporting our whole team? I am a Porter supporter as well as the other guys. What good does it serve to compare turn-overs stats for 2 teammates? Or to point out what you think about Porter’s ability? These guys are our team. If you are a UK fan then you are a fan of these guys. As fans, I think we only have the right to complain about effort. In this game, everyone gave their best effort. Porter played great in a very tough game with lots of ball pressure. So did Patterson, Stevenson and Meeks. Everyone played hard. Harris great to see you back! Liggins and Miller, hang in there and keep giving the effort and you will become stars someday. Harrelson, your day is coming so keep your head up! I could not be more proud. I am certain no one wanted the win more than the players. It took UL’s best game of the year and a little luck to win at home. Watch out SEC, the CATS are on the rise! Go CATS, everyone of you!

by LyricSmith on Jan 5, 2009 12:48 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

An exciting community-driven SBNation blog, by and for fans of the Kentucky Wildcats.

Community Guidelines
[UPDATED 01/18/2012]

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Louisvillelove_small
A death in the UK family

Recent FanPosts

323_small
UK Basketball: Kentucky Is In The Zone, Defense That Is
Emberlogo_sized_small
Anticipation Open Thread
Mostdiggity_small
Somethin' Strange: Zone-Busters or Carolina Fail?
Small
GOG 2011-12 #15: Vanderbilt
Small
DDMO A Figment Of Imagination?
Small
Derek Willis Interview with FOH
Small
Great article on Cats
323_small
Tempering Great Expectations: Do We Need Coaching From Calipari?
Small
Frustrated Fan!!
304labjbkcsj8uopp4ej_small
Just want to share what Hoosier fans seem to think of The Big Blue Nation

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Twitter Widget -- Follow me!


Managing Editor

Tru_small Glenn Logan

Editor

Wildcat_small BigSkyCat

Fl_family_photo_small Ken Howlett

Author

Small JLeverenz

Justified-olyphant_small jc25

Bluepaws_small a2d2

Img_0019_small Alex Scutchfield