UK Basketball: Kentucky Shakes Their Moneymaker
The adage goes; "You put fannies in seats with offense, but win championships with defense." That may not be as true today as it was 10-15 years ago, but even now, in a world of high octane offenses, a great defense and making free throws can carry a team through those sure-to-come games of tepid offensive outputs.
Saturday versus Alabama UK struggled to make shots in the first half, shooting only 30.8% (8-26), but Kentucky's defense limited 'Bama to only 29.4% field goal shooting. A game that could have been lost in the first half, instead was close enough (six points) for UK to climb back into the thick of things rather quickly in the second half; thanks to their smothering defense.
For the game, UK held the Crimson Tide to only 29.3% shooting. That represents the worst field goal percentage for a Kentucky SEC opponent since January 10, 2007 (Auburn - 27.9%). The Tide's most dangerous offensive weapon Alonzo Gee, plus Senario Hillman and Mikhail Torrance combined to miss 24 shots. If one takes away fabulous freshman JaMychal Green's 5-9 shooting, the rest of the team combined to go 12-49 (24.5%).
Obviously, UK didn't play great defense in the first half alone Saturday. In order to hold an opponent under 30% field goal shooting for a game, great defense must be played for the entire 40 minutes. Never more apparent was UK's commitment to defending with vigor as in the final 6:54 of the game:
Tied at 45, UK held Alabama to only two of eight shooting (25%), and forced four turnovers (a 23 turnover pace). Jodie Meeks and Darius Miller both recorded a steal, and the Cats nearly perfected another requisite trait if one dreams of cutting down the twine; making free throws down the stretch.
Over the final 4:33 of the game, UK made 12-14 free throws: Meeks 2-2, Perry Stevenson 7-8, and DeAndre Liggins 3-4.
Last year it was Ramel Bradley and Joe Crawford salting away games from the charity stripe. I think their teammates were paying attention and taking notes, because this year Meeks and Company have made the most crucial of free throws at an exuberant rate.
I think Billy Gillispie has convinced this group that defensive execution and making free throws are the keys to their success. While it's not unusual for coaches to preach such sagacity to their charges, having the necessary powers of persuasion is a rarity. Let's face it, most players have to be coaxed into playing defense. Well, Gillispie must be a "coaxer" for the ages.
Big Blue has seemingly also taken on the personality of their coach; tough, aggressive, and relentless.
Saturday, faced with the loss of a fallen teammate (Ramon Harris) to an unknown ailment, the 'Cats decided to take on Harris' most impressive basketball attribute; unmerciful defense.
The 'Cats fought through screens (over, not under), disrupted passing lanes, and pressured the ball. The "help" was almost always there, and on time. They continue to harangue the shooter by blocking, or nearly blocking a high percentage of shots (UK was credited with nine blocks, although they had at least two more), with Darius Miller leading the way with three. They were frenetic, they were active, and they played defense like they meant it.
This team is maturing, and becoming a nightmare for opposing coaches to game-plan against. With freshmen Liggins and Miller both playing their most complete defensive games of the year versus Alabama, a gap has been plugged; both freshman have struggled at times on the defensive end this year, but the "light bulb" may have came on.
Jodie Meeks may be the most important convert that Gillispie has. Meeks has always been pretty good defensively, but not as consistent as most would like. That seems to have changed. His anticipation skills, and pure speed combine to form a deadly duo for opposing guards to deal with. He seems energized defensively, and he's looking to create chaos for the opponent, whenever the opportunity presents itself.
Gillispie knows that getting his best player to "give it up" on the defensive end can sometimes lead the remaining players to focus even more on getting stops, and to be more precise in their execution. Is that what's happening here? We'll know soon.
Something I know now -- In Kentucky's five SEC games played to date, they are allowing only 58.4 points per game (63.5 on the year). For the year they are allowing only a 36.4% field goal percentage, but in SEC games UK's field goal % defense stands at 33.9. Impressive I'm sure, even to Ben Howland and Bob Knight.
Nearly as impressive is the discrepancy in how UK's opponents shoot for the year, versus how they shot the ball against Kentucky:
- Alabama -- Season FG% - 43.8, versus UK - 29.3% (-14.5)
- Vanderbilt -- Season FG% - 43.8, versus UK - 31.6 (-12.2)
- Georgia -- Season FG% - 42.1, versus UK - 31.3 (-11.0)
- Tennessee -- Season FG% - 45.3, versus UK - 37.9 (7.4)
- Auburn -- Season FG% - 43.6, versus UK - 38.8 (-4.8)
If that wasn't enough, UK's five SEC opponents have combined to go 30-102 (29.4%) from the 3-point line. And if one takes away Auburn's 10-26 performance, the other four teams have shot only 26.3% from beyond the arc.
Great numbers, even if the competition is experiencing a lull.
A Defensive Comparison
The '02-'03 "Suffocats", the group who I think is the best UK team this decade, won 26 straight games, swept the SEC regular season title, and won the Tournament championship. So no, I don't think this year's team is nearly as good as the '03 team, but the "Suffocats" are the standard-bearers for recent UK defensive excellence. So what better team to compare this squad to?
* '03 stats are for the entire SEC regular season.
'03 'Cats -- FG% Defense - 41.1, '09 'Cats - 33.9
'03 'Cats -- 3-point FG% Defense - 28.3, '09 'Cats - 29.4
'03 'Cats -- Points allowed - 58.9, '09 'Cats - 58.4
Even when their offense isn't clicking as it should; even when they commit mind-numbing turnovers at a rather rapid rate; even when their best defender goes down at half-time; even when Patterson has a lame middle finger which is heavily bandaged ... there is always defense.
UK's Moneymaker? Not as sexy as 54, but defense wins games too.
Thanks for reading, and Go 'Cats!
1 recs |
26 comments
|
Comments
FG % Gap Between UK And Opponents
This year it’s nearly 14% (UK 50, opponents 36) so far.
That’s the widest FG % gap ever by a UK team (check Jon Scott stats).
That’s the first UK team to be above 50% FG since 1978 team (54% FG).
That’s the lowest FG % by UK opponents since the 1950’s (I think).
by FortyYearCatFan on Jan 26, 2009 6:41 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
During preseason, I remember Forty saying he didn't worry about who would score
the points as long as we won. The obvious intent of the statement was that Forty would obviously want to win a close low scoring game than lose a high scoring game. Our defense is longer and more athletic led by Ramon and Perry. That is why they are in the lineup. When we got sucked into playing VMI’s or even UNC’s game, we dropped our defensive guard to play “run and gun” and lost.
Ken, I agree, when we are playing good defense we cause offensive fouls. When we are playing non-perimeter offense we are causing fouls. This year we are longer, more athletic and able to get more quickly to places on the court and sometimes that causes the opponent to foul. When we are fouled everyone on the team seems capable of hitting the FT. Great defense and high FT% are a great part of our “third man” offense. This is a great compliment to the coaches.
by Blueobsessed on Jan 26, 2009 8:07 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Sagacity?
You got me on that one….nicely done.
by tooblue on Jan 26, 2009 8:31 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Great piece, Ken.
Just terrific.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Jan 26, 2009 9:04 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Thanks Ken
I always enjoy your writings. Great read.
by kykat51 on Jan 26, 2009 9:51 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
agree
very niece piece.
My only thought is how do you compare the difference in level of competition from year to year?
Is it even possible?
IMO the teams the suffocats saw in conference would most likely be better than the same teams we see in conference now. Maybe that doesnt make a difference though.
DEEETROIT BASKETBALLL!!!
by davw83 on Jan 26, 2009 2:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, yeah
The SEC in ‘03 was probably a much better overall league. I don’t feel this team has reached the defensive standard set by that team, not yet anyway.
by Ken Howlett on Jan 26, 2009 3:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
One possible way to do this
This is a big question in baseball when it comes to comparing players across eras, and most of the time those comparisons are accomplished by looking at what a player did relative to his peers – that is comparing what he did against what an average player did in the same year.
It could be possible to do this in basketball too. For instance, you could compare UK’s combined Opp FG% against the combined opponents FG% in all other games (or just SEC games) and do this for both seasons.
For instance, say the average FG% in all 200X SEC games was 50% and UK held opponents to 40% shooting, then we might say that UK’s defense was 20% better than average (40/50 = .8, or .2 = 20% below average shooting). We could then do the same thing for 200Y SEC games and compare the two numbers to see which UK team did a better job of holding teams below average.
by JLeverenz on Jan 26, 2009 3:50 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Shot Blocking
Perhaps it’s just because they’re more obvious to the eye or to announcers and commentators but I perceive this to be one of UK’s best teams at blocking shots. So, Ken, put your statistical machinations to work and tell us where this year’s Cats rank, por favor.
by Wild Weasel on Jan 26, 2009 10:03 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Re: WW --I will most certainly do that
by Ken Howlett on Jan 26, 2009 1:18 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Here you go WW --
Blocked shots have only been kept as a statistic since the ‘78-’79 season.
This years team has 149 blocks in 20 games (7.45 avg.)
‘93-’94 – 195 blocks in 34 games (5.74) — This represents the next highest per game average in UK history.
Some others: ‘96-’97 – 203 blocks in 40 games (5.08), 98’-‘99 – 199 blocks in 37 games (5.38)
’99-’00 – 185 blocks in 33 games (5.61)
Sam Bowie (2.9), Melvin Turpin (2.7), and Andre Riddick (2.4) are the most prolific shot blockers in recorded UK history.
Bowie and Riddick hold the record for most blocks in a game with 9.
Most blocks in a season – Turpin with 83 in 1983, and Riddick with 83 in 1994.
Jamal Magliore is the reining ‘King of the Block’ for a career with 268 career blocks.
by Ken Howlett on Jan 26, 2009 1:46 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Coaching Shot Blocking
Muchas gracias, Ken. What’s folks opinion on shot blocking being a coachable technique? Seems that has been an increasing staple of Gillispie’s teams. Could be his emphasis on long athletes I suppose. In any case it sure contributes to Cats defensive prowess.
by Wild Weasel on Jan 26, 2009 2:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think there are aspects that are coachable
For example, teaching a player not to leave his feet until his opponent does. Also maybe positioning around the basket.
I would bet though that most of shot blocking success has to do with innate physical talent/instinct. I don’t think you can take any big guy with decent athleticism and turn them into a good shotblocker the way you can take someone and turn them into a good free throw shooter.
by JLeverenz on Jan 26, 2009 2:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Just to add to what JLeverenz wrote
A lot of Stevenson’s blocks come from “off the ball.”
I feel this comes from being taught to give “help” properly.
Timing is the most important aspect of shot blocking. I think “timing” ones jump can be taught, but a lot of the credit goes to, as JLeverenz says, “innate physical talent/instinct.”
by Ken Howlett on Jan 26, 2009 3:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
4 Factors comparison
Ken, great comparison of the two defenses. I hadn’t thought much about the Suffo-Cats, but the numbers you site are quite similar. Out of curiosity, I wanted to see how the two squads compared in the 4 factors for conference games, so I went to Statsheet to get the numbers. (2002-2003 here, 2008-2009 here)
Games 2003: 19 2009: 5
Possessions 2003: 1281 2009: 347
eFG% 2003: 44.3 2009: 38.8
Off Reb % 2003: 29.9 2009: 31.7
TO% 2003: 24.3 2009: 20.5
FTM/FGA 2003: 21.4 2009: 16.8
FTA/FGA 2003: 31.7 2009: 26.9
Def. Eff. 2003: 87.4 2009: 84.1
The 2003 team forced far more turnovers and did a better job on the defensive boards, but this year’s squad has a significant edge in eFG% a keeping teams off the free throw line. Both teams do (did) and good job of preventing the opposition from scoring with the current Cats holding a slight edge in Defensive Efficiency.
All in all, that’s quite encouraging for the future prospects of the team.
by JLeverenz on Jan 26, 2009 11:46 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I agree
Even early in the year, i thought we could be a great team if not for our turnover problem. the most efficient offensive team I’ve seen at UK since the 90s (when we don’t caught the ball up) and one of the stronger defensive squads (i feel we have played worse competition this year, so our defensive numbers are better than they should be if we played the same schedule as the suffocats)
I feel our success in the postseason pretty much rests on our lack of turnovers. We are certainly an underrated team in all other aspects.
by schizm42 on Jan 26, 2009 12:58 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Harris cleared to play..!!!
great news… Read it here
Steelers fan 1st! UK is my 2nd love.
by vinceuk1 on Jan 26, 2009 1:08 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Great!
Thanks, Vince.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Jan 26, 2009 1:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes Good News Indeed!
I hope it was just a stomach virus per his Mom. Good gosh there are many going around the state. I have had 2 instances since November.
We have to trust the doctors at UK to make intelligent decisions in these matters as do the parents of all these players. If tests come back negative, there is no reason not to clear Harris.
by kykat51 on Jan 26, 2009 1:19 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 













