A Sea Of Blue: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Steve McNair Dead - Former NFL QB Shot and Killed


spread the word

Vanderbilt 60 @ Kentucky 70:  Postmortem

Btn_ball_medium

Let me start out by saying that the Vanderbilt Commodores gave a game effort today considering that arguably their best player was out with an injury.  Despite falling behind by 20 midway through the second half, Vanderbilt not only made a game of it but put a real scare into most Kentucky fans by going on a 17-5 run at the end of the game to get the deficit to 6 with over two minutes left to play.  In the end, it wasn't enough, but you have to admire the effort it took.

For Kentucky, this was a very uneven effort.  The first part of the game was full of defensive errors that lead to Vanderbilt baskets, particularly from outside.  But at about the ten minute mark in the first half, Patterson got his second foul and the bench came in and picked the team up, ultimately allowing Kentucky to go up five at the break.

The second half saw Kentucky's defense play very well for 75% of the period.  In the other 25%, Vanderbilt was almost able to make a breathtaking comeback thanks to some untimely turnovers by Kentucky, missed defensive assignments and weak rebounding.  In the end Kentucky held on, but it wasn't an effort that they want to point to as an example of their best basketball.

Here are my observations:

  • Patrick Patterson was not impressive today.  Yes, Vanderbilt was very effective taking him away, but Patterson only managed 1 rebound.  Yes, he was in foul trouble, but Patterson should get more than one rebound by accident.  He did have 3 blocks and 11 points, so he did help.
  • Jodie Meeks played hard, but not particularly well offensively.  So he did the next best thing and played solid defense (except for a breakdown near the end of the game) and rebounded the basketball.
  • Darius Miller did some good things out there, but he just couldn't buy one from the field.
  • I loved DeAndre Liggins' defensive effort, and hated his effort on offense in the first half.  He forced three shots and made a brain-dead turnover.  But defensively, he was a nightmare for Tinsley.  With Liggins in the game, Tinsley did not get a single clean look, and I don't think he made but one shot in the second half.  At one point, Liggins turned Vanderbilt over on two consecutive possessions and forced a jump ball on the third.  Interestingly, after that aforementioned dumb turnover, he didn't have another one.  He only had two assists, though.
  • Perry Stevenson had a good game, but he still tends to disappear at times and only managed 2 rebounds.  He did have 3 big blocks.
  • Michael Porter was adequate, and made a clutch shot.  But he seemed tentative to me and turns down way to many open shots.  He did make his free throws, though, and that was critical.
  • Ramon Harris was terrific on the offensive end.  He was less than terrific defensively, however.  An unusual reversal of the norm, but he did rebound very well.
  • 12 total turnovers, and about 4 of them happened in the last 3 minutes.
  • At times, Kentucky's defense was remarkable.  At others it was pitiful.
  • Kentucky showed good patience attacking Vanderbilt's zone.  I'm glad to see the 'Cats learning to do this, because they will be seeing the zone a lot this year.
  • Josh Harrellson needs to have more of an impact.  He made one really clutch shot, but that's about all.
  • UK was outrebounded by a team playing mostly zone.  That ought to make Gillispie apoplectic.

Overall, this was a pedestrian effort that could have been good but for a very few minutes of ineptitude.  The most important thing about this game was the final result, which is a win.  But we are going to need a much better performance to deal with Tennessee, Florida and Arkansas.

0 recs | Comment 48 comments | Share on Facebook Digg!

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Galloway?

Where was Galloway? He didn’t see the floor this afternoon? More of Billy Clyde’s “he didn’t practice well this week” business?

by Danvillecat on Jan 10, 2009 7:58 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Meeks was stellar..

he did what all great scores do, he go to the charity stripe and he knocked them down. His great offensive production combined with 7 rebounds, 3 assists and only 1 turnover made him the star of the game. We are watching a speacial season unfold for Meeks and if it translates to an SEC championship and NCAA tourny success we are talking all-american honors.

by MyBloodRunsBlue on Jan 10, 2009 8:01 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

90.2% from the line to date! What an asset at crunch time!

Most encouraging stat? Only one turnover.

He also picked up Pat’s slack in the rebounding department (Tru’s comment about the number of long rebounds is accurate, but still Meeks was on the spot).

by Ken Pomeroy on Jan 10, 2009 8:11 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

it is one thing to take bad shots

and do nothing to compensate. Meek’s hustle, rebounding and especially getting to the charity stripe more than compensates— it is what great players.. what great scorer’s do.

by MyBloodRunsBlue on Jan 10, 2009 8:16 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

He was 8 for 8 tonight from the line.

Porter was 4 for 4.

What a refreshing change it is to have a UK team that actually shoots well from the stripe.

by Ken Pomeroy on Jan 10, 2009 8:17 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Don't get it

… everyone watched a different game than I did. Yeah, some struggles offensively, but we held the other team to 32% shooting for the game, and nearly under 30 save for the final few moments. We got maybe Patterson’s worst game of the season and still manhandled Vandy for 30 minutes.

Is this all about style points now, then?

The Heart & Mind of the Big Blue Nation ...

by JL Blue on Jan 10, 2009 8:01 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

agreed...

From the few people I have spoken to I am getting the same impression. They need to realize that this team is a long way from worrying about how they win, just that they win. I believe a lot of people want to look at this game or past games and see how we will fair against a UT or UF, but that just isn’t gonna work. We are far too inconsistent for that and, from what I’ve seen so far this year, so are UT and UF.

by the spork on Jan 10, 2009 8:13 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Exactly. UT and UF have been nothing but peaks and valleys all year.

I think the Hogs will prove to be the same, but haven’t seen more than one game, so I can’t be sure.

We just have to make sure our valleys don’t meet their peaks (see Harvard beats BC beats UNC).

by Ken Pomeroy on Jan 10, 2009 8:20 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The problem ...

… was that we did not sustain the effort. That’s what I didn’t like, and I didn’t like it a lot.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Truzenzuzex on Jan 10, 2009 8:58 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Young teams...

do that. They get up big and sort of slack off, its not ok, but it is understandable. You can’t expect this team to know how to play from behind and from the lead as young as they are. These things will fix themselves as the season goes on. We just need to mature a bit, your guess is as good as mine when that will be.

by the spork on Jan 10, 2009 11:49 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Vandy is a very strong defensive team, but we showed 'em how to play D.

Coming into the game they were Number 1 in the country in 2 pt. field goal defense, Number 5 in effective field goal % defense, and Number 33 in overall defense. They were generally regarded as having the best defense in the conference coming in. They had held 9 of their opponents to fewer than 60 points, and 13 of their 14 opponents to fewer than 70. (Illinois Chicago scored 74 on them.) That is outstanding defense.

With the little bit of foul trouble Patrick (nation’s highest % FG shooter) had, we still shot above what Vandy usually allows. Yes, their best player was out, but essentially, so was ours, because Pat was kind of a non-factor for the most part, and the reason we did not win the rebounding battle. I’m not knocking Pat, but it is clear he played well below his usual self, yet the team survived and during parts of the game, even thrived.

Furthermore, with the exception of several ill-advised shots by Jodie, most of our trouble hitting the basket was our two superstar freshmen going a combined 0 for 9 (Darius missed 4, and DeAndre missed 5).

If DeAndre and Darius had just not taken a shot, the rest of the team shot 52% against a very good defensive team.

Coach needs to figure out what is going on in DeAndre’s head with regard to the perimeter shots. He did not come in touted as a great shooter, but he has now missed 20 consecutive three-point shots over a nine game stretch. Over that same period of time, he has shot a very respectable 62% from inside the arc, and 75% from the free throw line. Something’s amiss.

Darius just got robbed on a couple of his that rattled out. I feel he will be okay in the long run (although I figured he would have hit his stride by now, and that hasn’t happened).

Mike Porter is shooting 86% from the free throw line, and Jodie is now 92 out of 102 for the year (90.2%). Those are just luxurious nubers for any team to have waiting to be fouled at the end of any game.

Porter has scored 28 points over the last three games. Maybe he is coming out of his shell as a scoring option for us.

Overall, I am encouraged by the game. The ten point victory was one better than Pomeroy predicted, and this was a team at 55 on his ratings index. Ogilvy and Patterson were kind of a wash tonight, as neither showed up (so to speak), so I think we can take Vandy at Nashville as well. Pat will not have two such games in a row against the same competition. Darius and DeAndre will play better as well.

by Ken Pomeroy on Jan 10, 2009 8:08 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It was a good win.

I don’t think I am encouraged, but I am happy with the victory. Something about this game really troubled me, and it was mainly the failure to put Vandy away when we had our foot on their neck. Jodie Meeks runs down and puts up a challenged three at exactly the wrong time, and creates a momentum shift.

This Kentucky team is not talented enough to do that. We need a killer instinct, and I felt we lacked that today.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Truzenzuzex on Jan 10, 2009 9:00 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

well, I noticed...

…that, for whatever reason, when we were up 20 with 8+ to play, we went into some sort of “stall ball”…!

Coaches decision..?

We should have kept attacking, IMHO

Steelers fan 1st! UK is my 2nd love.

by vinceuk1 on Jan 11, 2009 11:10 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yeah.

I mean, I’m all about taking some time off the clock, but we need to try to score, not concentrate only on running out the clock. Take the ball to the hole and get a foul, anything.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Truzenzuzex on Jan 11, 2009 11:17 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

was it me...

…or was Vandy begging Porter to shoot for the top of the key…?

My god, he wasn’t even looking at the basket…! That’s got to change…

Steelers fan 1st! UK is my 2nd love.

by vinceuk1 on Jan 11, 2009 11:20 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

No, it wasn't just you.

I just wish he would take and make that shot. It would have made life so much easier on Patterson.

We are going to lose games if our PG is going to refuse the top-of-the-key jumper. Mark my words.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Truzenzuzex on Jan 11, 2009 12:28 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Darius Shot Glitch

Darius is releasing his jumper on the way down. I am sure the coaches will fix that and I expect to see an increase in his shooting percentage. It was clear in this game. I recorded and reviewed.

by LyricSmith on Jan 13, 2009 6:16 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yep.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Truzenzuzex on Jan 13, 2009 8:06 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

JL is was a good game from UK.

Very good teams will win when they don’t play well.

Ken P., Meeks was great, the star of the game by far. I will take an ill-adivsed shot from Meeks over an open look for Porter always. I was glad to see Porter not hurt the team today, but he is not a scoring threat by any stretch, no more than 40yearcatfan is the answer to offensive rebounding.

by MyBloodRunsBlue on Jan 10, 2009 8:14 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I thought you would like that..

however, I will admit that Porter looks better and if he continues to play within his ability he will be a ligit contributer (or is it contributer?).

by MyBloodRunsBlue on Jan 10, 2009 8:18 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

my thoughts...

Patterson just wasn’t in it, not a bad game, just not the usual Patterson performance.
Meeks cut down on the TOs and did a great job rebounding. He didn’t shoot the ball great today. He made up for it with his foul shooting, but I can remember atleast a couple times when he got bailed out by the refs on those drives.
Porter played a pretty good game yet again. My only real gripe is that he didn’t shoot the ball enough.
Harris played very well on the offensive end and it was great to see him make some open shots.
Liggins had a great game aside from his shooting.
Same goes for Miller, but he was taking good shots and I am very optimistic about him after this game. Some of his shots just refused to go down, but I am confident that they will begin to drop for him soon.

Overall, good game. A learning lesson for our young team about how to play with a big lead against good competition.

by the spork on Jan 10, 2009 8:27 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It was more of a team effort

Than I have seen recently when PP was on the bench.

This team is showing marked improvement in many areas. Not especially offense with Liggins and Miller, but great defense. That is where it starts with these freshmen….offense scoring will follow. I would like to see more Galloway.

by kykat51 on Jan 10, 2009 9:30 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It's a Win

Overall picture: Great defense in stretches, good overall. Vandy missed a lot of uncontested threes. With some exceptions, most of our scoring was from individual moves and hustle, not team ball movement. Because of youth in the SEC, most teams are probably going to be inconsistent. We’ll have more quality experience on the floor than most of them.

by Fortunatus on Jan 10, 2009 9:34 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I agree with respect to your comments about our defense.

And Arkansas’ loss to Miss. State tonight shows exactly that inconsistency of which you speak.

As far as our offense tonight, I am not as negative as you seem to be. It was just that we had two freshmen go 0 for 9.

Remember that Vandy has one of the better defenses in the country (see my numbers on that above).

Our 13 assists on 24 made shots is not bad team ball movement, and we shot it “okay” against a very, very good Vandy defense, and had only 12 turnovers. I suspect the Pomeroy numbers will show that our offense was the second-most efficient Vandy has faced this year — and we did it with Pat having a ho-hum night.

Incremental improvement is happening, just as it did last year. Hold forth hope!

by Ken Pomeroy on Jan 10, 2009 10:32 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

IMO Patterson will be back next year! He just is not ready to be a lottery pick.

I agree, he had an okay game, but I was so looking forward to a tremendous battle with the big guy from Vandy. When that didn’t materialize, I thought that Patterson would dominate. Instead he got in foul trouble just like he did last year. Another year will add the maturity he needs to not make those type of mistakes. Next year, with the new recruits, he will have size (Orton) playing along side of him so he can try the threes and know that missed shots will be rebounded. We will also have very good subs. (Pilgrim, Stevenson and Harrellson). Before entering the NBA draft, I think Patterson needs to add some weight (245-255) to be more markable.

Meeks, on the other hand, is taking better care of the ball, which was his major downfall. While I think he already has a NBA body, another 10 pounds of muscle wouldn’t hurt him either. With the numbers he is putting up, I just hope Jodie stays another year.

If my crystal ball is correct and both these players stay, it should be quite a year next year. In the meantime, this year will be a learning experience for the entire team. Go CATS!

by Blueobsessed on Jan 10, 2009 9:36 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Jodie

isnt leaving this year.

NBA scouts need another year in college to get a good read on him.

DEEETROIT BASKETBALLL!!!

by davw83 on Jan 10, 2009 9:38 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Orton

Daniel Orton, frosh ’09.

The Heart & Mind of the Big Blue Nation ...

by JL Blue on Jan 10, 2009 10:38 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

of course

i would have known that if i could read. :)

i thought it said this year.

GO BIG BLUE!! GO BIG BLUE!!

by UKWildCatFanatic on Jan 10, 2009 11:19 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

i see only one possibly

and that’s patterson. i really don’t believe that meeks will be a lottery pick…he still forces too many shots, turns the ball over (though not as much as before), and doesn’t look to pass much when driving.

i love meeks, and think s he’s been absolutely amazing, but i just can’t see him going in the first thirteen picks.

GO BIG BLUE!! GO BIG BLUE!!

by UKWildCatFanatic on Jan 10, 2009 10:17 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Agreed..

PP MAYBE a lottery pick next year… I absolutley love Jodie Meek’s game. I think he will go down as one of the all-time greats at UK. BUT, he is not a lottery pick this year or next. Even if he repeats next season what he is doing this year, he may not even be a first round pick. The NBA is totally different.

by MyBloodRunsBlue on Jan 11, 2009 6:23 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Good point! Of the members on that dominate Gator team that won two national chamionships,

how many are getting quality playing time in the NBA? Where is Brewer? Where is Green? They were very good college players. Where is the guy that set all of the SEC and NCAA three point shooting records? NBA wants flash, showmanship and dominant players. Every team has more than five and is always seeking more. Unless you would be able to score 30-40 every night in the NBA, like LaBron, Kobie or Wade, it is tough to immediately break into the NBA starting lineups. Again I make the point it is in the best interests of players like Meeks, Patterson and Orton to stay in school and break as many school records as they can and win a national championship to increase their marketability before they try the big time. Look at the NBA teams and see how international they are. Our college kids are competing for NBA spots against a worldwide population. Great players in college do not always end up with large NBA contracts for a variety of reasons.

by Blueobsessed on Jan 11, 2009 8:02 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That hurts

Arkansas shot 3-22 from 3-pt range and 7-15 from the free throw line. It’s tough to win when you shoot like that.

GBB!!!

by OGETARTS on Jan 11, 2009 7:35 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Despite 2 wins against ranked teams...

I am still not that high on Arkansas and I do not really like the play of Fortson and Clarke. I watched both wins and came away unimpressed. I will take the upside our our two freshman over those two any day. Fortson/Clarke may be further along right now due to the fact that they have to play but Liggins and Miller will be the bigger impact players in the SEC before any of their careers are over.

Xbox Live Gamertag: hoopchi

by hoopchi on Jan 10, 2009 11:41 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

KyGirl we Need You

We’ve gotten past the Lville game and opened up SEC play. It’s time for some more inspiration from our poet laureate.

by hoboat33 on Jan 10, 2009 10:35 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

We'll take the win

Against a good defensive team as Pom said. It was good to see Harris with a good offensive effort. Very good to see the turnovers down! The lack of consistent defensive intensity on our part (especially toward the end) with Meeks and PPat not lighting it up is still troubling. When we’ve got a team down by 20 without our usual offensive threats I think it’s really important to keep that D kickin to get more offensive looks. As Tru said, we’ve got to have that killer instinct. The free throw shooting and low turnovers really helped today. It is a win too, by golly! I’ve still got high hopes for our SEC play. Go CATS!!!

by slidemank on Jan 10, 2009 11:31 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Liggins...

really showed off his potential tonight. His behind the back pass to Stevenson on the breakaway really got the crowd into it. I can’t remember the last time I heard Rupp as loud as it got during the middle of that 10 minute stretch in the second half.

by ben-p on Jan 11, 2009 12:38 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

excited rupp

good point benp, i noticed that too i just want rupp to be like it was in th good ol days

by hummer11092 on Jan 11, 2009 2:59 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

UK had a stretch in the 2nd half

It was from about the 14 min mark to the 4 min mark. During that 10 min stretch, we played outstanding basketball. Our intensity was excellent, our D was great and we looked good on offense.

The rest of the game, I thought our play was average and even below average at times.

GBB!!!

by OGETARTS on Jan 11, 2009 8:04 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Porter

…. over the last 3 games he is averaging 9.3 ppg :-)

GBB!!!

by OGETARTS on Jan 11, 2009 8:27 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

A couple of thoughts...

1. I have maintained for awhile that the key to this team’s success is defense. I thought they played an outstanding defensive game against Vandy. Granted there was the issue toward the end, but I see this team getting better in this area.

2. From my perspective, there is a coaching issue with this team that I haven’t seen brought up. A good team is made of players who know and play their roles. Other than the starting four (Patterson, Meeks, Porter, and Stevenson), I don’t know if the other players know their roles. It seems so haphazard on who and when players are coming off the bench. The rotation is not consistent and its no wonder Miller and others play w/o consistency and for some, w/o confidence.

'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'

by HozeKing on Jan 11, 2009 10:55 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I agree

That’s the point of my question on Galloway. He was good enough to start the previous games yet he doesn’t even get on the floor against Vandy. That just doesn’t make sense unless he was injured and there were no reports of an injury. There’s a difference between a coach being a disciplinarian and being a martinet. A lot of UK fans are assuming there’s a method to Billy Clyde’s madness but I’m beginning to wonder.

by Danvillecat on Jan 11, 2009 9:55 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think we all ...

… wonder a little. Gillispie’s reasoning is just so opaque.

But, that’s just his way, I guess.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Truzenzuzex on Jan 12, 2009 7:04 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

His rotation and substitution patterns are very bizarre at times

I have no idea on Galloway. I can only assume it’s a combination of Harris playing better and Galloway not practicing well.

GBB!!!

by OGETARTS on Jan 12, 2009 8:47 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

An exciting community-driven SBNation blog, by and for fans of the Kentucky Wildcats.

Community Guidelines
[UPDATED 3/31/2009]
Start posting about the Wildcats »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Uk_logo_blue_small
NEW UK T-Shirt

Recent FanPosts

100521b_the-scales-of-justice-posters_small
Former College Athletes Suing EA and NCAA, Right On
Uk_vs_uofl_small
Summing up UK bball (apparently)
Chris__pics_12-21-2008_040_small
Coach K to the Lakers?? Come On...
Small
Offering scholarship to 13-year old ...
Small
1x1 video analysis with a college coach!
Small
MLB Players Target Of Lawsuit
2t-3ds-fbspin2_kentucky_240x240_small
Jarmon Likely to Be Taken in Supplemental Draft
Small
Big Blue Madness at Commonwealth
Banners_small
Misc thought of the day: The open scholarship.

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

Twitter Widget -- Follow me!


Managing Editor

Tru_small Truzenzuzex

Editor

Small Ken Howlett

Author

Diane-black_heels_small BigSkyCat

Official Partner of CBS Sports