Kentucky Football: Is it good, or is it bad?
I find that I cannot answer my own question. I want to belive it is good, but there are reasons that I am given pause. I am convinced that Michael Hartline is growing up at quarterback before our eyes, but it takes two to make a pass connection, and I think our receivers are simply not cutting it. I know they are young, and I understand that we are used to having clean-running, glue-handed receivers that would play every play to the whistle, rarely blow a pattern and almost never drop a pass that hit them anywhere near the hands. But what we have right now is a receiving corps which, when you take away Dicky Lyons, is just not a viable option.
But what of the running game? We at a Sea of Blue, as well as many other blogs and websites, spent all summer touting our stable of four strong backs as evidence of another great UK ground game. But get this -- against UK's two D-I opponents, the 'Cats have averaged two (2) yards per carry on the ground. That isn't anemic, it is unacceptable. Derrick Locke, for example, is leading all UK rushers with a three (3) yard-per-carry average. Just think -- if we give it to Locke every time, we can recreate the famous Woody Hayes "Three yards and a cloud of dust" offense. But just barely, and if we never substitute. I know it is not all the fault of the backs, but some of it is.
Which leaves only one thing -- the defense. The defense which looked so good against Louisville, allowing them 205 total yards and holding I-AA Norfolk state to only 164 total yards, but then allowed MTSU to rack up an impressive 383 yards of offense. Yes , a big chunk of that came on 3 large plays, including that 60 yard "Hail Mary" at the end of the game. But if MTSU can rack up our defense for almost 400 yards with their plain-vanilla spread, what will the Heisman Trophy winner-led Urban Meyer spread do to us in the Swamp? Just thinking about it makes me cringe. Alabama in Tuscaloosa? I don't want to think about it.
Kentucky needs to get better in almost every area, and that right soon. Quarterback seems to be coming along nicely, but the defense is revealing a schizophrenic streak in the backfield and the offense is one-dimensional because the receivers can't seem to ... well, receive. Neither of those is anything like a recipe for success in the SEC and if Dr. Brooks & Co. wants to avoid an ignominiously bad SEC portion of the season, he had better prescribe something powerful pretty quickly.
I don't mean to be a doomcrier, and I think MTSU is way better than they get credit for, but with that said, Kentucky must show much more against Western than they have shown against any foe so far if we want to have confidence that they can compete with the Alabamas and the South Carolinas, or even the Vanderbilts (who, by the way, are 3-0 against much better comp than UK has played). And I'm not even going to mention the injuries.
Ok, so now I ask you -- am I wrong to be concerned? Help me out here, Big Blue Nation. Convince me that I should be more optimistic. I badly want to be convinced, so you are starting out with a willing subject.
Comments
Wow
Uhh, so I’ve been knee-deep in Hurricane Ike (luckily, just figuratively living in SW Houston, not literally), so this is the first I’ve heard whatsoever of the Kentucky game. What. The. F$*!. What an incredible almost ending that was. Wow.
by jc25 on
Sep 15, 2008 8:35 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
All I can say is...
too many players decided to take days off from practice last week after a 2-0 start. Absolutely ridiculous and it sure showed in Saturday’s game.
UK was extremely lucky to win that game and I hope the team knows that!
We need more leadership from the older guys and they had better get their stuff together as a team before the WKU game because the SEC is after that.
by kykat51 on
Sep 15, 2008 8:58 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Even though it was a win...
None of the coaches were pleased with the play…excepting Hartline, DLJ and a few others. Going to see a shakeup in the next 2 weeks.
by kykat51 on
Sep 15, 2008 9:33 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Good, not great
I think the team is looking pretty good, but not great.
Strengths:
First and foremost: the defense is a beast and will only improve as we work on improving our pass coverage. It goes without saying that the defense has carried us so far, so I won’t beat a dead horse. But great Kentucky D, know you are appreciated!
Tim Masthay is also amazing. What a great improvement from last year. All of these touchbacks are just what the doctor ordered for our strong defensive team. It’s just what we need to put our defense in the position to succeed – and it’s working!
Hartline looked good in the MTSU game. His long pass isn’t in the same league as Woodson’s, but otherwise he looks every bit as good as Woodson looked at the end of last year. Of course, this is only against weak competition so far, so time will tell. I’m impressed with how quick a thinker Hartline is. When a play is busted, he makes a play out of it without hesitating. Besides, you’ve got to love a player who comes off being booed by low-class Kentucky fans to become the SEC Offensive Player of the Week.
We’ve got a great coaching staff. The strongest top-to-bottom that I can remember us having at Kentucky. I’d like to have seen us parlay our sucess into a few high-star go-to players, but other than that, we’re very strong.
We’ve got talent and depth at the running back position. If we can ever open up the offense to give these guys some space, they could do some damage.
Weaknesses:
The field-goal team was not looking good. 2-6 is not good, and only one was really long range.
Getting the big head and slacking off is a keeping this team from being great, if you listen to Coach Brooks (and you should!)
There’s a lack of player leadership this year. That goes into the mental focus issue above, and is just one of those intangibles you need to be a consistent team.
We had some injuries to key players. Explosives Randall Cobb and Micah Johnson will be especially missed in the upcoming weeks.
The receiving corps is hurting. Lots of talent, but too many blown routes and dropped passes. We had probably the best receiving corps we’ve ever had last year, making the drop off even more noticeable.
The offensive line is not very good at making holes for the running game. We’ve got some very good running backs and they just can’t get any headway. Look for this to get worse when SEC play starts.
Here’s what’s really keeping the team from being great: a lack of offensive balance.
Last year what was great about the offense was that it was balanced. If you overplayed the receivers, we could run it. If you overplayed the run, we could make huge passing plays. They defense really had to guard the whole field. With the receiving corps underperforming, and Hartline’s lack of strength at the long ball we really are getting punished with our screen passes and middle runs.
All the potential is there though. I think if the players can just get their heads around the problems and take ownership, this team could really upset some teams in the SEC and go to a good bowl. But that’s a big if and will take a lot of luck as well.
by EEWildcat on
Sep 15, 2008 9:36 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Good question Tru....
For me, just look at who we have played and who we will be playing. Sure the offense can improve but how much and how quick? The SEC is loaded with stud defenses and our offense will struggle. Im optimistic about 6-6 but not any better.
by SevenRings on
Sep 15, 2008 10:32 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Neither
Kentucky is neither good nor bad; we are teetering on the edge of okay.
Our offense will show some flashes of brilliance as the players — especially the WRs — mature. O-line seems to be doing great on pass coverage, but didn’t really exert their will on MTSU’s run defense. Granted, this is due to teams like MTSU playing 8+ in the box, daring Hartline to check down to a deep passing route. Stacking the box is also why we’re averaging only 2 YPC, Tru. That, and it seems our offensive line hasn’t exactly figured out how to exert its running will yet. (To the O-line’s credit, pass protection has been pretty good.)
Hartline will get better, and has shown that he will manage a game. That’s great when you have a 2 TD lead, but not-so-great when you’re down >3 in the 4th quarter. Somebody get his throwing arm some creatine! Cobb is not the answer, but a Cobb/Hartline combo might keep defenses off-balance enough for a few desperate TDs.
Our defense leans more on the side of good. However, any further significant injuries will be devastating for the unit. We go from having a D who is strong enough to keep fighting late in the 4th quarter, to a D who has nothing left in the tank in the 4th. We do have more depth as a team, but its clear we need our starters on the field as much as possible.
The next couple of weeks leading up into the Alabama/South Carolina/Georgia gauntlet seems very similar to the post-Gandalf-falling-in-the-mines-of-Moria Fellowship: Our Quest stands upon the edge of a knife; stray but a little, and it will fail, to the ruin of all. Yet hope remains while the Company is healthy.
(Of course, if we lose every freaking starter, and Rich Brooks tears his ACL and MCL because the mascot Scratch accidently bowls into him, I would want us to go into the Georgia game feeling like the end of Helm’s Deep: “The Horn of Helm Commonweatlh will sound in the deep, one last time!”)
The Online Home of the Big Blue Nation...
by TheFakeGimelMartinez on
Sep 16, 2008 12:57 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Man ...
… what a sweet LOTR reference. :-)
Good points, though.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on
Sep 16, 2008 3:23 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
and unfortunately injuries and Lexington...
have become synonymous with one another lately, both in football and basketball.
Some memorable ones from last year are Keenan Burton, Rafael Little, Tony Dixon, Alfonso Smith, Derrick Jasper, Jodie Meeks, Michael Porter and Patrick Patterson…. and now this year seems to be more of the same. I am so tired of watching our teams play at 3/4 strength and having to make cheap excuses to all the haters down here in Nashville.
Maybe there is too much Limestone in the water up there? Perhaps it’s Late night Tolly-Ho or Mad Mushroom that’s to blame? It’s probably the K-Lair. I lived there for five years and once I even suffered a high ankle sprain crossing Rose St. on my way to the Chem/Phys building for Chem 105! I was out 2 to 4 weeks. :)
I need a Sea of Blue because I am surrounded by Tennessee orange!
by sleepytimetea on
Sep 16, 2008 1:32 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Heh.
Yeah, the dreaded HAS is truly a painful and slow-healing injury. But severity does matter a lot.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on
Sep 16, 2008 3:24 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
We can be very competitive
If the kicking game had not imploded this game would not have been as concerning. MTSU got one touchdown on a one long play and the other score on a gift from Hartline. The defense is fine. The receivers are what they are but the running game can and hopefully will improve. The line is a work in progress but the backs should be better. They were better last year. Nobody seems to be able to break a tackle or move the pile. I saw more backs getting tripped up by one armed ankle tackles than ever. Hopefully one of our backs will step up and take charge. I think that will happen and when it does happens we will be competitive.
by Slim Wagers on
Sep 16, 2008 7:45 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Defensively...
I think we are better off than you make it seem. MTSU has playmakers, and they were able to make some big plays, but once the staff made some adjustments, our defense was still very stout, despite losing some key starters to injury.
Offensively, I think your concerns are right on target. As I’ve said many times since Saturday, the offensive line and wide receivers must get better. The same, as you mentioned, should also be said about the running backs. The wide receivers need to get better, because if the wide receivers pose no deep threat, then defenses will continue to stack 8 in the box. I don’t care how good our O-Line and RBs play, with 8 in the box the running game will continue to sputter. Also, Hartline needs to be able to show he can throw the deep ball with accuracy, which I’m more optimistic he can do, so long as his WR run the right route, catch the ball, and don’t run out of bounds before catching it…
by BBallSophist on
Sep 16, 2008 10:07 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Playmakers
Being at athe game BBALL is correct. MTSU had some pretty good receivers to go along with a pretty good QB. They made some really tough catches that were defended pretty well.
DEEETROIT BASKETBALLL!!!
by davw83 on
Sep 16, 2008 11:38 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Seiber
Was he booed during the game. I couldn’t tell on TV.
by Slim Wagers on
Sep 16, 2008 12:33 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yes
He was indeed booed during the game and it was much louder than Harline’s boo situation the previous week. I dont think the coaching staff said much about it because it may have actually been warranted. I dont think that people were booing Lones specifically as much as the generally poor play of much of the offense.
DEEETROIT BASKETBALLL!!!
by davw83 on
Sep 16, 2008 12:59 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I am not really able to analyze
And I didn’t stay in a Holiday Express last night. I will say that what I listened to last Saturday SOUNDED like the UK of old that so often snatched defeat from the jaws of victory. In those days, the Cats would beat a couple of patsies, maybe even surprise a decent team, and somehow get all cocky like they were up and coming, only to come out very flat against a team they ought to have over-matched and fall on their face masks (so to speak). I hope Coach can shake some sense into them before WKU, because that’s our last chance to get the kinks out before the schedule gets real, real tough.
by olddoc on
Sep 16, 2008 10:47 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Q and A
Q: Kentucky Football: Is it good, or is it bad?
A: Not nearly as good as Coach Brooks led us to believe; not quite as bad as the MTSU game led us to believe.
by Wild Weasel on
Sep 16, 2008 11:29 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I think ...
… that the part about the MTSU game is actually a very good point.
Even a moderately competent kicker would have had us up by 12 at the point of the blocked kick, which would have had us in a position to run the ball on 4th down rather than kick. We made some very unusual mistakes in that game that burned us, and nearly cost us the game.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on
Sep 16, 2008 2:15 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hope is on the way!
Reasons not to get discouraged:
1. Hartline is looking better and now has confidence.
2. O-line will improve with Gary Williams’ return. Sure, they didn’t look great vs Louisville, but combine Williams with Hartline’s improvement and things are looking up for the running game.
3. T.C. Drake is now an offensive weapon.
4. Dickey Lyons has now stepped up.
5. Aaron Boyd hasn’t been able to play at full speed. Look for him to improve throughout the season and make a difference.
6. Ryan T. will improve the FG unit.
7. The punting team is great.
8. Nobody’s been able to run vs the defence.
9. The MTSU game will light a fire under every practise from here on out.
10. The bye week will allow coaches and players to make adjustments. We’ll see some new plays to take advantage of the strengths and hide the weaknesses of this team.
by sayeth on
Sep 16, 2008 5:53 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs













