Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The End Of Sabanball: Details, Barbarians, And Precision

Governor's Cupdate -- Monday, August 11th

Btn_football_medium

Btn_men_medium

Twenty days and counting from the big season-opening showdown with Louisville, it's time to take stock and see where we are.  This evaluation is a snapshot in time, only, and just a general feeling of where both teams seem to be.

Unlike last year, neither Louisville nor Kentucky are highly regarded.  Both teams have lost their starting quarterback and star receivers.  There are lots of question marks on both sides, so I thought I would add them up just a bit.  Today, we'll begin with the offense.

Storyend_dingbat_medium

Both Kentucky and Louisville have lost star quarterbacks and receivers.  Louisville has an advantage at quarterback in that they have an heir apparent to Brohm in Hunter Cantwell out of Paducah Tilghman.  Kentucky has now tapped Michael Hartline for the job, but Cantwell is much more proven in college competition than Hartline.  Louisville has to be considered to have a clear edge at this position.

In the backfield, Louisville has 6'0", 230# bruiser Brock Bolen (gotta love alliterative "tough guy" names like that) who is returning from an injury-riddled junior year, but is extremely capable.  Joining him in the backfield is Bilal Powell, George Stripling and Joe Tronzo.

Kentucky, however, has a stable of SEC-proven backs four or five deep.  Alfonso Smith, Derrick Locke, Moncell Allen, Tony Dixon and John Conner are all proven players.  Kentucky has a clear edge in the running back position.

At the receiver position, both teams bring back very little in the way of returning talent.  Virtually none of Louisville's receivers have ever made any kind of measurable impact on a college game.  Kentucky has one proven returning wideout in the charismatic Dicky Lyons Jr. and a couple of guys in Kyrus Lanxter and DeMoreo Ford who are experienced, but are currently injured.  Slight advantage to Kentucky.

On the offensive line, both teams lost talented tight ends, but Kentucky returns much more experience overall.  Louisville must replace three starters on the interior line, as well as their tight end, and Kentucky must replace only two, and Kentucky has the more experienced depth.  Advantage -- Wildcats.

And now, as Paul Harvey likes to say, it's time for news:

Storyend_dingbat_medium

Kentucky

Louisville

Comment 2 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Freshmen extraordinaire?

I am getting hyped on our football chances this year. I hope we can make more noise than expected from all those supposed experts.

I do have to compliment Cantwell even though a Card. He has great parents and he has listened and followed their guidance. Hey what’s wrong with frog gigging? Something my Dad and buddies enjoyed greatly. I just never enjoyed seeing all those bullfrogs in my bathtub the next morning! They are very tasty, but they pop like hell when frying :-) ...just like bull fries lol.

Just call me an old country gal.

by kykat51 on Aug 11, 2008 4:06 PM EDT reply actions  

I agree ...

... I used to gig frogs myself. We’d take ‘em home, clean ‘em and eat ‘em.

I try not to kill things anymore, but I used to fish and gig frogs all the time.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Aug 11, 2008 7:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

An exciting community-driven SBNation blog, by and for fans of the Kentucky Wildcats.

Community Guidelines
[UPDATED 01/18/2012]

Twitter Widget -- Follow me!


Managing Editor

Tru_small Glenn Logan

Editor

Wildcat_small BigSkyCat

Fl_family_photo_small Ken Howlett

Author

Small JLeverenz

Justified-olyphant_small jc25

Bluepaws_small a2d2

Img_0019_small Alex Scutchfield