A Sea Of Blue: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Want to help build SB Nation? We're hiring! Bar-right-arrows



Reality = Perception?

So, I was just reading about this Dotson kid who was just offered by UofL. About Pitino, he says "...he gets players to the next level." This got me thinking, we've been hearing recruits say this about Pitino since the old days, but how long has it been since it was really true? Going straight off the top of my head, I'd guess Antoine's had the best career out of them all, but didn't he leave school about 12 years ago? I don't want to rag on any individual players, but do y'all think RP really deserves this reputation as a developer of NBA players? It seems I can remember as many NBA disappointments as success stories.

1 recs | Comment 64 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Pitino

You’re right Mahatma, Pitino hasn’t produced a lot of great NBA players, and he hasn’t produced very many mediocre professionals of late.

Francisco Garcia finally started to get some serious playing time this past year. Off the top of my head I can’t think of any other recent UL players currently in the NBA. Of course, eventually Caracter will make a great pro … pro what, is what we don’t know.

I might disagree with you a bit on your selection of Antoine Walker as Pitino’s best pro. My vote goes to Jamal Mashburn. Even though his career was hindered by injury—when he played he was very good.

Delk, McCarty, Anderson, Mercer, and Walker all had decent careers, although none were ever all-stars. Nazr has had a solid career, but who gets the credit, Rick or Tubby? Uh oh, I’ve started an uncivil war.

by Ken Howlett on Jul 28, 2008 1:11 AM EDT   0 recs

Pitino-2-NBA

0 players from Boston U. 2 players from Providence. That’s 2 in 7 years.

15 from UK. (That’s players he coached, not necessarily recruited, UK) 10 of those made it while he was UK coach. 5 made it after he left.

2 from Louisville. Garcia and Reece Gaines. Unless you count 3 of his recruits who signed, but never played at Louisville. That’s 2 in 7 years.

by FortyYearCatFan on Jul 28, 2008 6:13 AM EDT   0 recs

Gaines

I saw Gaines play a couple of times ( live ) and I thought he would be a really good pro. It just hasn’t worked out for him though. I think he recently signed with a foreign team, but I’m not positive about that.

by Ken Howlett on Jul 28, 2008 3:41 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Have you ever seen Mashburn do the shimmy?

I feel like the Mash/’Toine comparison is more or less a tossup. Walker was an All-Star 3 times, and won a championship. Although he was certainly not ‘the man’ on that Miami team, he was one of the two top players on the Celtics’ 2002(?) conference finals team. Mashburn would’ve been twice the player without the injuries, but if frogs had wings…

Back to the main point, I guess I’m wondering what you think of Ricky P’s development of players (does he really add a lot of value in terms of NBA performance vs. potential)? I think Nazr is the best example of what he can do for a player (or could do; he hasn’t been able to work that same magic with Caracter). Scott Padgett probably owes him a lot, too.

However, thinking of all the ‘can’t-miss’ players who basically became NBA journeymen, I don’t think RP deserves this reputation. We’ll see how Clark and Williams pan out in the next few years, I guess. Thanks for the comments.

by Mahatma on Jul 28, 2008 7:44 PM EDT   0 recs

Walker 3-time all-star

I mistakenly included Walker’s name on a list of Pitino’s UK NBA players.

To anwer your inquiry about Pitino’s ability to develop players who succeed in the NBA: In my opinion Pitino uses his knowledge of the NBA, and what the NBA looks for in a player, to recruit the types of players that aspire to play in the Association rather than play 3 or 4 years in college. His salesmanship abilities probably outshine his ability to actually develop NBA-type players. Although I think he is a fine coach, the myth has become bigger than the accomplishments of the man.

Based on the pro careers his former players have had, I don’t think he stands out as exceptional as far as his ability to produce pros. Rather, he takes players who were already headed in that direction and possibly fine tunes their abilities.

There aren’t very many players who played for Pitino who were “surprise” pros ( Pope may be an exception, although he was either injured or on the bench for most his pro career ).

I do agree with your assessment.

Far and away Pitino’s greatest attribute as a major college basketball coach is his ability to recruit, in my opinion.

by Ken Howlett on Jul 28, 2008 8:34 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

And Yet

He declined to sign both Lofton and Rondo (back in 2003) when both WANTED to attend U of L.

He’s a good recruiter when Billy Donovan, Mick Cronin, or Reggie Theus was his chief recruiting assistant.

by FortyYearCatFan on Jul 28, 2008 8:45 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

I didn't say he was perfect.

More to your point—Part of being a great recruiter is hiring a great “recruiting coordinator”. And if the last two years are any indication ( save Caracter ), then I’d say Mr. Masiello has learned a thing or two from his predecessors, and Rick.

But, I like your anti-Pitino tilt.

by Ken Howlett on Jul 28, 2008 10:52 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Case In Point

UK recruiting in 1998-99-2000 was very solid with George Felton as lead recruiter.

Pitino chooses very good assistant coaches. His best trait is player motivation (I think).

by FortyYearCatFan on Jul 29, 2008 6:47 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Forty, your Pitino hate again rears its ugly head!

For a forty-year cat fan, you sure have a short memory.

RP declined to take Lofton (who is NOT in the NBA, by the way) and Rondo only because he already had someone universally regarded as better than both—Sebastian Telfair, who went right to the pros. The fact that a coach successfully recruits an NBA high school first rounder rather than Rondo and another guy who couldn’t even make it to the NBA does not suggest a lack of eye for NBA caliber talent. Quite the contrary.

And don’t even start on the point that Rajon has made a bigger splash in the NBA than Sebastian (he has, yahoo!), because we don’t know what Sebatian might have done had Rick been able to work his magic on him for a year or two at Louisville before Sebastian made the jump to the NBA (which Sebastian was foolish to do). He should have done what Rajon did, which was stay at least a couple years.

Nor do I fault Rajon for leaving us when he did—he couldn’t stand Tubby holding him back any longer, and in his case he NEEDED to get out from under Tubby and into the NBA where a good development coach could take him to where he needed to be (which is where Sebastian would have been had he given Rick the chance).

As far as Ken’s statement that Pitino just knows how to recognize and recruit great talent that is headed to the NBA anyway, I say, “No sh*t, Sherlock!” Where’s the deep, hidden truth there? That is precisely what every coach in America tries to do. Everybody wants the top talent; some (like Rick) are just able to identify and secure it better than others. Coaches look for the “sleepers” only when the low hanging fruit has already been picked—and even there RP has done as good a job at that as anybody.

Right now UK is fortunate to have a coach who is among the best in the country at using the talent available, even when it does not include the McDonald’s AA’s. I think BCG’s better than RP at getting guys to use what the have in a way that best fits the particular team they are playing for. BCG did not get his five “Coach of the Year” awards because of his recruiting (yet).

One of the things that has always impressed me about Pitino is that while every coach has the occasional big recruit who flames out (God knows Tubby had his share), Pitino seems to have a lot fewer of these than anybody else except maybe Roy Williams. You have to give him credit, even when he wears the red.

Go ‘Cats!

by Ken Pomeroy on Aug 2, 2008 2:49 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Re: Pom

The point I made in my earlier post was that Pitino was BETTER at getting the types of players that he desries than most other coaches … just as you wrote later in your paragraph. Part of the reason he is better than most is the fact that the perception ( however untrue ) is that he “sends players to the NBA”.

Give me some time and I’ll list you the “msitakes” Pitino has made just since arriving at UL. The new NBA rule saved Rick from more embarrassing mistakes, not dissimilar to the many he made in Boston.

As far as Telfair is concerned; everybody in the universe knew the kid was going pro. Did you see the documentary? That kid was going to college about like I am going to teach at MIT.

But, if he had successfully recruited Telfair maybe he would have known better than to recruit Caracter … oh, another Pitino recruiting mistake.

by Ken Howlett on Aug 2, 2008 3:19 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Yes, that's a fair point as to Telfair. But on another front, how do you explain the '87 Friars?

Pitino took the first of his three schools to the Final Four with no NBA players besides the one they call Billy Donovan (who played all of one year—for Rick at NY). That would certainly suggest that he does something right whether the talent is there or not.

by Ken Pomeroy on Aug 2, 2008 6:59 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Re: K. Pomeroy -- I'm not saying he isn't a good coach ...

... just a better recruiter than head coach, in my opinion.

I think Pitino is a fine coach, although in my opinion he made some major strategical mistakes in some very big games while he was at UK ( ‘92 Duke, and ‘97 Arizona ). In the ‘94 Marquette game I thought he made some big mistakes in that game as well, but what do I know - Side-note on ‘92 Duke - I do give him credit for having that team in the game. Duke was very good that year, and UK probably had no business even being within striking distance in that game. But he had those guys executing, and operating as one to such a high level … it was a thing of beauty to watch.

I thought his first couple of years at UL were highly successful considering the level of talent he inherited, and the players he purged from the program ( rightfully so ). I thought he did a particularly good job with Larry O’Bannon and Ellis Myles. He is on the cusp right now of making UL a year-in-year-out top 10 or higher team, I think. Which of course I despise.

You mention the job he did at Providence; that’s one of the all-time great coaching jobs in college basketball history, in my view. He basically rode a shooter ( Donovan ) and an IU castoff ( Brooks ) to a Final Four. And along the way he dealt with the loss of an infant. He must have had incredible focus and desire to pull that off.

To be honest, I was disappointed when Pitino left UK, but I wasn’t upset with him personally. I rooted for him when he went to Boston, and I’d be pulling for him today if he had taken the Vegas job, which he nearly did. But when he decided to go to UL instead, I, like many others, put him on my naughty list.

So when discussing him I tend to gravitate more toward the negative. It’s how I’m wired.

by Ken Howlett on Aug 2, 2008 11:04 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

No Pitino Hatred Whatsoever

The reality is that he makes mistakes (offering Carlos Toomer after observing 1 practice, or NOT offering Lofton and Rondo) at recruiting.

With Donovan (or others) as his #1 ace recruiter, he does well.

Those are facts.

by FortyYearCatFan on Aug 2, 2008 4:00 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

No

That’s 1 recruit.

His best recruits were by Donovan (early to mid 1990’s), Cronin (early 2000’s), or Theus (mid 2000’s).

by FortyYearCatFan on Aug 2, 2008 4:09 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

And Terrance Jennings. That's 2.

Scout ranks his 2008 clas as the fifth best in the country. The boy he schooled is doing okay at #8, but not as well as the old man, even though Donovan is coming off two national championships.

It would appear that the facts do not support you hypothesis. I’m guessing you’ve heard that before.

by Ken Pomeroy on Aug 2, 2008 8:13 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Pitino Recruits At UK

Donovan was the chief recruiter for the 1992, 93, 94 classes.

Delk, Rhodes, McCarty, Prickett, Dent, Sheppard, Epps, Pope, Walker, Edwards, Padgett, Mills, Anderson.

Sound familiar? That was the majority of the 1996 roster, perhaps the best UK team of the modern era.

by FortyYearCatFan on Aug 3, 2008 8:59 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

He had his best STATISTICAL year after Mercer and Anderson and Epps and Prickett left.

Gee, I wonder why his numbers went up after that group graduated? Maybe Pitino just wasn’t smart enough to know Nazr was a better option (but I doubt it). The simple truth is that Nazr had his best years the same time almost everybody else does—in his later years, when he is older, stronger, and more experienced. No mystery there. Pitino kicking Nazr in the ass (and pointing out how overweight he was) was the best thing that ever happened to him.

by Ken Pomeroy on Aug 2, 2008 4:19 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

No Doubt 1998 Was His Best Year

He was a better C in 1998 than 1996 or 1997. He really developed as a post player after P left UK.

by FortyYearCatFan on Aug 2, 2008 4:43 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Nazr

I saw a tape ( of a high school game ) of Nazr after he committed to UK, and I couldn’t believe my eyes. His butt was wider than the Persian Gulf. I couldn’t believe Pitino offered him a scholarship.

When Nazr showed up in the fall, I thought he was a different guy. Pitino probably told him the same thing he told Donovan at Providence; “you’re too fat, lose weight, or you’ll never play”. Nazr becoming the player he did shocked the heck out of me.

by Ken Howlett on Aug 2, 2008 11:11 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Nazr

No doubt Pitino got him into much better condition. But his play in 1998 was >>> 1997 and way > than 1996.

by FortyYearCatFan on Aug 3, 2008 8:54 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

This raises an interesting question for me regarding coaches and NBA potential

Who produces the best pros among the “elite” coaches?

Coach K produces a lot… but other than Elton Brand and Carlos Boozer, what’s he got?

Pitino has been discussed.

Lute Olson… a case could be made here I think.

Roy Williams… honestly, I think this might be where I would go with the argument. It may not hold up to scrutiny and I may be a little skewed in my perception due to Paul Pierce’s recent success.

Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."

by chirop1 on Jul 29, 2008 10:12 AM EDT   0 recs

I an trying to type Christianxxxx Laetnexxxxxx.........

but I can’t bring myself to type the words.

Start with Dawkins and just keep going.

by Ken Pomeroy on Aug 2, 2008 2:53 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Dean Smith

He produced more NBA stars than most elite coaches.

by FortyYearCatFan on Jul 29, 2008 3:11 PM EDT   0 recs

I wouldn't disagree

But I was looking more for coaches who are still active.

As I’ve thought about it more, I think I’d go with Calhoun (as much as it pains me to say that).

Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."

by chirop1 on Jul 29, 2008 3:54 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Smith successfully recruited NBA stars. I would not say he produced them (as in "developed").

Tell me you have not heard this one; “Who is the only man in basketball who could hold Michael Jordan to one NCAA championship?” Answer: Dean Smith.

Dean and Tubby shared “Smith Disease.” They recruited world class talent, and only rarely seemed to be able to make it synthesize into a championship team (and sometimes Tubby didn’t even get the world class talent part done). With the bodies he had coming through the Dean Dome, Smith should have had fifteen championships (and he didn’t deserve the one Michigan gave him with the phantom time out call).

Roy Williams is the other side of the coin—a great on the floor coach as well as a phenomenal recruiter (same for K). I don’t know why his teams sometimes crack at tourney time, but I’m glad they do, or Kansas and UNC would both have another five championships. While all you guys bitch about Little Brother, it’s Chapel Hill that keeps kicking our ass and catching back up to us in wins, and they’re going to do it again this year. I’m worried sick about Roy’s tenure and can’t wait for him to retire so they can bring in another Brad Doherty.

by Ken Pomeroy on Aug 2, 2008 3:04 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Tubby And Dean Smith

Both won about 70% of their NCAA tournament games. Tubby (so far) or Dean (career) are within 1% of each other.

by FortyYearCatFan on Aug 2, 2008 4:02 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Yeah, but nobody handed Dean an NCAA championship team.

He built his program from the ground up, whereas Tubby took a championship program and run it into the ground.

by Ken Pomeroy on Aug 2, 2008 4:21 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

I mean "ran" it into the ground.

Also, many of Smith’s years occurred before the first and second round gimmees that pad the NCAA of later coaches like Tubby.

Count the number of final fours Dean reached versus Tubby. Hmmmm…. What’s that stunning silence I hear?

by Ken Pomeroy on Aug 2, 2008 4:24 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Dean Smith 11 FF, 2 NCAA Titles

And losing recrord in FF games.

I wouldn’t be too proud of those numbers.

by FortyYearCatFan on Aug 2, 2008 4:46 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Nobody Handed Either One Of Them A Championship Team

The 1997-98 UK roster had (1) no returning full-time starters, (2) no one who had ever been All-SEC, and (3) no one who ever averaged 10+ ppg.

by FortyYearCatFan on Aug 2, 2008 4:45 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Man, where were you hiding in 1997? EVERY '97-'98 starter was a returning player.

And Scott Padgett was a returning All-Final Four selection! Allen Edwards would have been (and Pitino would have had #2 N.C.) if he hadn’t sprained his ankle before the tourney.

Wayne Turner was All NCAA Regional Tournament selection.

Jamaal Magloire was All SEC Freshman Team.

Jeff Sheppard had spent four years under Rick Pitino preparing him for his championship moment. The only reason Jeff Sheppard didn’t have accolades the year before was that he red-shirted his “first” senior year because the team was so loaded. And I suppose you think Cameron Mills just fell off a turnip truck over the summer?

I like Tubby, but let’s get real and look at the facts. Tubby inherited a team and a program in championship form. If you want to know what happens when he inherits a team not in championship form, look at what happened to Minnesota last year. Not only did they not win the national championship, they went 10-13 over their last 23 games, and failed even to make the NCAA tournament. Where is Jeff Sheppard when you need him?

Dean Smith inherited a scandalized program that had fired its head coach for corruption, and that first team finished 8-9, after which he hever had another losing season, and finished in the top three of the ACC for 33 consecutive years. He made the final four once for every three years he was a head coach. Tubby has made it once—ever.

There is no comparison.

by Ken Pomeroy on Aug 2, 2008 7:45 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

What you've done ...

... is either misread him or raised a strawman and dashed it asunder.

Forty said this:

The 1997-98 UK roster had (1) no returning full-time starters, (2) no one who had ever been All-SEC, and (3) no one who ever averaged 10+ ppg.

Your response was this:

And Scott Padgett was a returning All-Final Four selection! Allen Edwards would have been (and Pitino would have had #2 N.C.) if he hadn’t sprained his ankle before the tourney.

Forty is right, and so are you, but your argument is not responsive to his point. None of the 1998 team were returning starters. All were talented, but even if Pitino had stayed, nobody I know of would have expected another run to the national championship with a team that had no returning starters at all. Pitino’s depth was also more experienced, even though the 97 team was severely depleted by injury.

Tubby inherited a team that should have gotten only to the sweet sixteen or final eight with a final four berth as an outside possibility, and won the tournament with them. That’s my opinion, anyway. The ‘98 team did (slightly) more with guts and determination than the 96-97 team did with raw talent and ability. It is also my opinion, which will forever be unproven and unsupportable, that Pitino would not have won the NCAA championship with the 1998 team. But we will never know.

Maybe a healthy Edwards would have been enough to get it done in 96-97, I don’t know. I do know a healthy Derek Anderson would have mattered a lot more than a healthy Edwards.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Truzenzuzex on Aug 3, 2008 8:06 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Talented? Yes

Experienced? Not really.

The 1998 team had plenty of ? marks. It answered those ? quite nicely.

The 2008 Minnesota team was beset with late season injuries, too. No one noticed because their coaches didn’t make a big deal about it.

by FortyYearCatFan on Aug 3, 2008 8:52 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

I hope the horse isn't dead yet.

I think this is a subject worthy of a research project (Bachelor’s thesis, anyone?) for which I have not the time nor the expertise. If one could correlate the relationship between rating out of high school and NBA draft status, perhaps an objective measure could be obtained. I fear, though, that the result would end up being skewed toward Phil Martelli and Mark Few, based on a couple of moderately-rated recruits who became first-round draft picks. Small sample size is a [choose your own word]. Add to that the complexity of the phenomenon (how much credit is to the coach, and how much to the player?), and you’re verging on the unanswerable question.

I see the argument for Calhoun, but I think maybe Izzo? Or maybe (excuse me for saying so) Billy Donovan? I’m thinking here especially about Corey Brewer. The jury’s definitely out on him as an NBA player, but I remember the Tubster wasn’t too impressed with him out of high school.

by Mahatma on Jul 30, 2008 1:04 AM EDT   0 recs

Izzo?

Really? I don’t claim to follow Michigan St or anything, but who has he produced? I can think of Morris Peterson and Eric Snow who are servicable pros and of course Jason Richardson (but he wasn’t there long and was HIGHLY touted coming out of HS). Just curious what would have earned Izzo a nod.

by lacrosse_cat on Jul 30, 2008 8:42 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

And I should add that I think he is a top flight college coach, just not sure how great he is at producing pros (ahem, I’m looking at you Respert and Cleeves).

by lacrosse_cat on Jul 30, 2008 8:43 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

You are correct.

I forgot when Izzo started as Head Coach but when I looked it up, both Respert and Snow were Heathcoat’s players. But I did remember one more MSU player, Zach Randolph. Although I wouldn’t want to claim him.

by lacrosse_cat on Jul 31, 2008 8:00 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Knicks

The Knicks dont want to claim him either.

DEEETROIT BASKETBALLL!!!

by davw83 on Aug 1, 2008 10:58 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

An OBJECTIVE measure? How in the world could anything

relying on or incorprating the recruiting ratings be regarded as “objective”? There’s nothing more subjective in the world, as our ‘09 recruits are finding out. Although the rating services sometimes piggy back on each other and “monkey see monkey do,” they are also frequently miles apart in their evaluations of high school talent—until they have intimidated each other and reach a happy medium. Which service would you use, and why? And which year’s rankings? The ones in place when the fellow was offered, or when he graduated? Sometimes miles apart.

And since when is the draft status ever an objective measure? You would be measuring this bunch of guys’ subjective opinions (high school raters) against this other (NBA) bunch of guys’ opinions. That would never result in an objective result. ( Joe Montana went in the third round of the NFL draft—what else needs to be said about the professional draft processes?)

I’m not even sure I care about whether a guy’s graduates do well at the next level except for the extent to which it causes recruits to look more closely. The fact is that some guys who are perfect for the college game are not perfect for the NBA game—and yes, the games are in fact different games, because the bodies playing them are a different pool.

I think it would be more interesting to look at NCAA success by coaches without draft caliber players.

by Ken Pomeroy on Aug 2, 2008 3:58 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

That's Easy

Few NCAA Div I coaches succeed without (NBA caliber) talent.

Not Wooden. Not Rupp. Not Dean Smith. None of them do.

by FortyYearCatFan on Aug 2, 2008 4:05 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Tell that to Jim Beilein, or Dick Tarrant, or Rick Majerus (pre Utah), or even Nolan Richardson.

Yes, it’s easier to win a national championship with a team full of first round draft pics (see ‘99 Connecticut [6] or ‘96 Kentucky [6]), but it can be done with just one (‘94 Arkansas), or even none (see Loyola). Corliss Williamson was the only player on that nc team who was recruited by anybody else. One of Scotty Thurman’s favorite quotations is, “We certainly weren’t a team full of lottery pics.” Heck, Corey was a darned junior college player nobody wanted. Richardson did a fantastic job of teaching guys that hustle beats talent (or can at least blunt its edge).

Moreover, there are many, many teams that, while not being able to grab that national championship ring, have been able to stay consistently competitive without any first tier talent.

West Virginia hasn’t had a player in the NBA since 1981, but look what they have done. Three Sweet Sixteens and an NIT championship in the last four years—without Randolph Morriss, or Rajon Rondo, or Patrick Patterson, or Joe Crawford. And have you not seen what Princeton, or Davidson, or Gonzaga, or Valparaiso consistently do? Where were you when UAB made its surge in the 80’s? Why do you think Beilein is at Michigan now?

Yes, Rick Pitino won the N.C. in ‘96 with six first rounders, but do you remember how many were on his ‘87 Providence Final Four team? None. In fact, the ONLY NBA player on that team played a single year - for Pitino at NY - and his name was Billy Donovan.

And do I have to remind you how many times the Richmond Spiders (who’ve never had a first round pic) beat a team loaded with NBA talent, like defending national champion Indiana, or Syracuse (with Billy Owens, LeRon Ellis, David Johnson, and Adrian Autry), or Auburn (with both Barkley and Person)? I think Dick Tarrant had two NBA players in his CAREER. How many times did he beat a #2 or #3 or #4 seed?

The fact is that it does happen, and actually with some degree of regularity. I’d like to see the stats on who does it best.

by Ken Pomeroy on Aug 2, 2008 6:51 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

All Of Those Coaches

Had talent on their NCAA teams.

I don’t recall Princeton, Davidson. or Valparaiso having much (recent) NCAA success.

Gonzaga HAD talent and that proves my point.

by FortyYearCatFan on Aug 3, 2008 8:50 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

And, Gonzaga has put some players ...

... in the NBA recently—Turiaf, Pargo, Morrison.

by Ken Howlett on Aug 3, 2008 2:02 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

My word, Forty! Davidson knocked the Zags out!

If you can’t remember Davidson having much recent NCAA success, then let me refresh your recollection. Last year Davidson made the Elite Eight, and missed the Final Four by a single bucket, losing in the REGIONAL FINAL 59-57 to KANSAS, who just happened to go on and win the national championship. And whom did they beat in the process? Just Wisconsin (31-5), Georgetown (28-6), and, yes, Gonzaga (25-8). How much more recent or successful do you want? Is that not successful in your book, or is it not recent? You really should get out more.

Far from proving your point, you picked an example that made mine. I also pointed out the West Virginia success (recent and past), as well as the fact that it hasn’t had an NBA player in 27 years. Nor do you acknowledge my point about Richmond, Tarrant, and Beilein—sustained success over many years.

All of these D-1 teams have talent. The question was never “who has talent”. The question was which coaches and teams perennially win without NBA level talent. I’ve named the several that leap to my mind.

I’d be interested in what others think.

by Ken Pomeroy on Aug 6, 2008 4:10 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Last Year

Davidson was a good team.

Gonzaga has been good for 10 years.

by FortyYearCatFan on Aug 6, 2008 6:36 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Brewer

Top 25 rated and McDonalds A-A in HS.

He was very thin (170 pounds) then and reportedly had a subpar workout for UK coaches in summer of 2003. UK was interested but wanted to see him play in summer camps. Florida got him first.

UK wound up with Morris, Rondo, Crawford, and Bradley getting the 4 open scholarships. That was the #1 recruiting class in 2004.

by FortyYearCatFan on Jul 30, 2008 6:12 AM EDT   0 recs

And we all know how many national championships they won, don't we?

The only good thing about that class was that it ultimately gave us BCG.

by Ken Pomeroy on Aug 2, 2008 4:01 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

The 2004 Class Was Very Good Indeed

Take away Delk after 2 years and McCarty after 3 years, how many would the 92 class have won?

by FortyYearCatFan on Aug 2, 2008 4:04 PM EDT   0 recs

BCG Has Never Been Close To #1 Much Less #8

He’s 3-4 (career) in NCAA games. He needs to get close first.

But an experienced coach would have had a great NCAA chance with Morris at C and Rondo at PG.

by FortyYearCatFan on Aug 2, 2008 4:47 PM EDT   0 recs

Experienced? He was fresh off the Sweet 16. His A & M team ranked #7 in the nation...

and narrowly missed an Elite Eight appearance by one point to Memphis. And get this—he did it with only one NBA quality player! What will he do with three or five, like Tubby had in ‘98?

I can’t wait.

Hey, Forty: I hope Tubby can make the tournament this year. It really sucks to have a losing record in conference (8-10) and to have to rely on an Out -Of-Conference schedule ranked the 283rd worst in the country to try to pull you through. I hate that for him. I think he’ll be okay there in Minneapolis.

by Ken Pomeroy on Aug 2, 2008 8:05 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

I Think So

Minnesota plays a Cream Puff OOC schedule and a favorable Big 10 schedule this season and has its best roster in almost 10 years.

I look for them to have 23 W and earn NCAA bid.

He’s 14 (NCAA bids) for 17 (seasons), which is among the best % of all Div I coaches.

by FortyYearCatFan on Aug 3, 2008 8:48 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Here are my Final Four picks (not predictions!):

(1)UK
(2) U of L
(3) Minnesota
(4) Oklahoma State or Arkansas or Florida or Arizona State

What a hoot that would be.

by Ken Pomeroy on Aug 6, 2008 4:15 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

The First 2 Are Possibilities

Florida has a chance.

But the Pitino coaching (playing) tree would be well represented.

If healthy (and Gillispie shows he can become a good POSTSEASON coach), UK has the chance to get a high seed (#2 or #3) and knock on FF door.

by FortyYearCatFan on Aug 6, 2008 6:39 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Wow.

Looks like some poster who shall remain nameless woke up on the wrong side of the bed this morning.

by blue kentucky girl on Aug 2, 2008 4:48 PM EDT   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

An exciting user-driven SBNation blog, by and for fans of the Kentucky Wildcats.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Bcg_avatar_small
SEC Predictions
Small
Pelphrey Getting it Done
Small
Are we fooling ourselves?
Me_small
Legion coming back??
Small
A Favor To Ask (For Erik Daniels' Mom)
Bball0_small
Patterson now projected as a lottery pick
Small
Looking for Game Film from 1986-1987
Small
Where have all the "players" gone?
Small
Looking toward January . . . a change in the lineup Part II
Dj_small
UK vs. U of L/Momentum Shifter

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Managing Editor

Tru_small Truzenzuzex

Editor

Small Ken Howlett

ad