A Sea Of Blue: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



The Blazers' Changing Paradigm Bar-right-arrows



Learning the "Lessons in Blue"

So there it was -- the much anticipated and much feared Herald-Leader article about Billy Gillispie's first year in Lexington.  As I went to click my mouse on the link, a weird thrill went through me.  I had heard so much in the run-up to this article.  "Tipton is planning to say horrible things," said the rumors.  Things that just can't be true, but that people would believe.  Things that will surely end the career of Gillispie, Barnhart and possibly even Dr. Lee Todd.

And here it was, right in front of me.  The byline, contrary to rumor, was not Beelzebub Incarnate, A.K.A. Jerry Tipton, but Mark Story.  Should I fear?  Has Story become Darth Tipton's apprentice on the Dark Side of Lexington journalism?  Had the budding Evil Empire of the Herald-Leader finally called forth from their putrid imaginations a Death Star of an article that would cut coach Gillispie's newborn career at Kentucky from the womb and smite its ruin on the side of Rupp Arena?

Well, as Death Stars go, this article is about as threatening as Teddy Ruxpin.  In fact, I think some will consider it little more than a puff piece, particularly the, "Get Gillispie" conspirators to whom it implicitly refers.  But it is full of interesting revelations, even though at the end of the day, it leaves you very angry and bitter at the Lexington establishment, and how poorly they have treated our new basketball coach.  It is, in fact, a not-so-subtle indictment of the UK "connected," and suggests that the genesis of the ubiquitous rumors was among some of the program's most ardent supporters.

Many things about this article struck me as interesting, but the discussion of the rumors and their disposal was extremely so, particularly this quote by a professor, Nicholas DiFonzo, an expert in rumors:

Nicholas DiFonzo, a professor at the Rochester Institute of Technology and a rumor expert, says Gillispie's two prior alcohol-related arrests "likely served as a 'plausibility threshold' that helped these rumors spread, in the same way that the fact that Barack Obama's middle name is Hussein made the [false] rumors that he is a Muslim plausible."

Well.  So the dark chapters in Gillispie's past made the rumors seem plausible on the macro level.  But what about the micro level?  Suppose someone told you they had heard a rumor about Gillispie.  Your initial response is, "How do you know this is true?"  If the rumormonger tells you they heard it from, "a friend they trust," you are probably not going to believe it.  But if they tell you they heard it from, "A person who knows someone who works at UK," your level of confidence goes up.  It goes up even further with, "someone who works in the athletic department," and still further with, "someone who works on the basketball staff."

Given their pervasiveness, we have to conclude that much of this gossip was started by people who claim to know someone in or close to the program.  That's really the only way they could be spread -- the, "plausibility threshold," would not be met otherwise.  DiFonzo suggested that some of the rumors could have been started by a faction that opposes Gillispie, or people who were angry at him for some perceived slight, which I find highly likely.  There is a small but not insignificant group of people, some of them known to me, who don't like Gillispie and may think that this is the way to get rid of him.   But after this article, I think their job may have gotten significantly harder, because, "They say" turned out to be a liar again.

Gillispie claimed in the article that he didn't take the hearsay of last year personally.  With all due respect and without meaning to insult the man, he would have to be more than human for that assertion to be true, and human he is.  But surely we can forgive him that, because it does appear that in spite of the pain of it all, he has managed to put it in the past.  Considering the personal and hurtful nature of the whispers, that in itself is truly an impressive feat.

Moving on from the rumormongering, I found Story's discussion of Gillispie's lack of preparation for the crucible of Lexington to be utterly fascinating, how easy it is to step on the wrong toes by simply not knowing they are the wrong toes.  It also explains why Rick Pitino had such little difficulty managing the transition to Lexington, having come from a high-profile media maelstrom himself.  It's truly a wonder to me that Gillispie managed to survive given the series of booby-traps laid before him and fusillade of whispers hurled at him.  Sometimes it just doesn't pay to be an "old country boy."  This would seem to be one of those times.

How Gillispie managed to cope with all this madness, I really don't know.  I can assure you that no salary would be sufficient to entice me to go through what he apparently went through last year.  God knows, it just can't be good for your heath, physical or mental.  But it appears as though his singular, almost obsessive focus on basketball coaching and the realization that he is coaching in Kentucky, famously dubbed the, "Roman Empire of college basketball" by Traitor Rick, helped pull him through. 

Put that one in your pipe and smoke it, Big Blue Nation.  That smoke is sweet, indeed.

0 recs | Comment 40 comments

Read Related

Story-email Email | Print |

Comments

Display:

Well said...

...and I think it’s good that the LHL addressed some of these rumors, too. They can get crazy, for sure.

I live in Atlanta these days, and I heard them down here (often from gleeful Georgia fans, who have proven themselves to be quite the petulant lot), but plenty of phone calls from home were filled with them, based only on the assertion that someone, somewhere down the chain knew someone involved.

So, while I agree with you that sources matter rather than just the arrests, they probably do help spread it when you get far enough out from the supposed “original” source.

Ugh. I’m glad the rumors (and this article itself) seem to be behind us.

If it wasn’t 11am on a Sunday, I’d say that I’d drink to that…

by nocodecub on May 18, 2008 11:02 AM EDT   0 recs

Great piece Tru

What I took away from the LHL article is what I have always thought; Billy Gillispie is a genuine person. He genuinely wants to do a good job —for himself and everyone else. He is not afraid to fail, no matter what obstacles are placed in his way; he is not a quitter and will continue to pursue what is his ultimate goal -- to win basketball games and more importantly, championships. A person who is afraid to fail doesn’t take the head coaching job at Kentucky. They don’t attempt possible career suicide by taking on the most prestigious job in all of college basketball. I take great comfort in the fact that Coach Gillispie’s expectations concerning the success of UK basketball, match, if not exceed my own. He must absolutely love the job of coaching and recruiting at UK in order to suffer through and overcome all the road blocks being placed in front of him this past year. Like Tru, I am pretty there is no way I would have survived with my sanity if I had gone through BCG’s last year. I would be an extremely unhappy person. But, luckily, I think BCG’s idea of happiness is different from my idea of happiness. Or, maybe he is just a better actor that he thinks he is. : )

by BigSkyCat on May 18, 2008 11:57 AM EDT   0 recs

Nice piece by the H-L

Definitely some good journalism by Mark Story. He did a responsible job investigating the malicious rumors at the source. It shows journalism can be used for the good of clearing a man’s name, rather than just to destroy. Given the nature and tone of the article, I’m not surprised at all who’s on the byline.

by EEWildcat on May 18, 2008 1:27 PM EDT   0 recs

The Hearld Leader article should have been written

months ago to put the rumors to rest and clarify a few things.

by String Music on May 18, 2008 1:31 PM EDT   0 recs

AMEN

Exactly my thought as I read it too.

It seems odd such a positive collection of word comes so close on the heels of Tipton/Maggard. And Tip is on vacation too.

Oh well, it was really nice to read it on such a beautiful day.

Changing how you think will change what you think.

by wilson452 on May 18, 2008 7:21 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

It Comes Down To W And L

Gillispie will succeed (probably) or fail (unlikely) by having 3 or 4 W to every L at UK.

I don’t think the other stuff matters.

by FortyYearCatFan on May 18, 2008 8:40 PM EDT   0 recs

I don't think it matters either...

But that other stuff can certainly get in the way of those Ws.

by sylvar on May 18, 2008 8:58 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Forty, good point about the WINS being the only thing that ultimately matters.

I understand what people are saying about the timing of the article, (a way to pacify the BBN because of the whole Tipton vs. Maggard thing) but IMO; the rumors are not going to stop just because of this one article. Especially if we don’t see the desired results we expect on the court. Regarding the rumors, it doesn’t matter if the article was written two months, or two days ago. If people are hell-bent on spreading rumors about Coach they are still going to continue to spread rumors, so the rumors will never really be put to rest will they? But, as Tru points out, hopefully those initiating the rumors have a harder time after this "fluff" piece. WINS is the only thing that will eventually silence those who want to oust BCG. At the end of the day, it is all about how BCG deals with "all that other stuff".

by BigSkyCat on May 18, 2008 9:08 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Good Article, however...

I THINK the boy with the spina bifida is from Wolfe Co., not Powell Co….don’t ask me how I know…I will never admit being a graduate of Wolfe Co. High School…OOOPS!

by cpacat on May 18, 2008 10:13 PM EDT   0 recs

Yeah, I thought I was right...

and my source was…tah dah…Mark Story’s own article in the Lexington Herald Leader. See Attached.

http://www.kentucky.com/605/story/87103.html

Guess my Kentucky Geography is better than his! I will wait for a retraction!

by cpacat on May 18, 2008 10:18 PM EDT   0 recs

Tru hits another home run!

My only criticism of Mark Story’s article is the inclusion of the plitical reference to Obama. The professor’s thoughts on rumors were ok. Better left at that. A basketball coach at Kentucky is held more accountable than most any politician.

by SamKat on May 19, 2008 5:32 AM EDT   0 recs

Nice piece

Story put together a nice piece of writing there. I think this sort of story really puts a spot-light on the low-brow writing of the Tiptons of the world. Story acknowledged the rumors and the tough practices… and lets the reader draw their own conclusion. Isn’t that what reporting is supposed to be?

One thing that stood out in my head as funny was this:

Before the SEC Tournament, all 11 of UK’s student managers and trainers got a new dress suit courtesy of Billy Gillispie.

If Gillispie had done that for the team it would be a major NCAA violation and the kids would be kicked out of school and coach would lose his job. But its perfectly okay to give the student managers gifts… I can understand why the student athletes would get frustrated.

Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."

by chirop1 on May 19, 2008 8:43 AM EDT   0 recs

Interesting point ...

... but then again, those free rides are probably worth a lot more than new threads. :-)

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Truzenzuzex on May 19, 2008 9:33 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Athletic staff napping?

In most organizations, when a new department head comes in, the CEO makes sure that the support staff (personnel, legal, PR) helps the newcomer off to a smooth start. Somebody should have told Gillispie that the Lexington Rotary appearance was a must. If he wasn’t told, the UK athletic staff dropped the ball. This is the kind of thing (along with some others) that should not happen in a well-managed professional organization or in an elite sports program. I get the feeling he was kind of left to his own devices.

by Fortunatus on May 19, 2008 9:43 AM EDT   0 recs

You have to wonder about that.

Perhaps there are people in critical positions there who either secretly or overtly want him to fail. I’m not making that accusation, necessarily, but it does make you wonder.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Truzenzuzex on May 19, 2008 9:48 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Coach Gillispie

Would people just please let this man do his job? Tubby moved on and Gillispie just arrived. Does anyone in BBN think Patrick Patterson would be playing for UK if Tubby were still coach? Does anyone think the 2008-09 recruits would have chosen UK if Tubby were in Lexington? Maybe even the Celtics’ Rondo would have stayed longer if Tubby had not been there—even though Tubby brought him in.

The snakes who dislike Gillispie are the kinds of fans who want magicians and not coaches. No one is a bigger fan than I and I want to give this man a chance to build his own dynasty. If Pitino called UK the Roman Empire of basketball, just remember the cliche’: “Rome wasn’t built in a day.”

I am not only a graduate of UK, but I have been watching the Cats since the late 1940s.
Evidently the Herald-Leader has gone downhill since I was at UK in the Sixties. Apparently new blood is needed. My faculty advisor was a former HL staffer and while I liked him, we disagreed over a lot of petty things.

by craggycat on May 19, 2008 3:53 PM EDT   0 recs

well, I hate to be argumentative...

but I do believe that quite a lot of “anybodies” do believe that Patterson would be playing at UK if Tubby had stayed. From what I understand the Patterson family was quite fond of Tubby, and the proximity of UK to WV was huge with them-so one of the deciding factors in the decision was totally unrelated to the coaching staff. So this anybody right here, for one, doesn’t see any reason to feel that Tubby wouldn’t have landed him. It is certainly a huge, huge tribute to Gillispie that he was able to close the deal after coming in so late in the game, Obviously, whether PPat would have committed had Tubby stayed or if he would have headed to Florida or Duke is not only not that important, it’s also totally unknowable. It’s up for debate-but I wouldn’t be so quick to think that no logical person thinks Tubby would have landed him too. I don’t know about Rondo-he and Tubby didn’t appear, from an outside perspective, to have a super-tight relationship-but I think it has been proven that Rondo was ready to go pro, and I don’t see any evidence that it was Tubby and only Tubby forcing him to the league. Again, you’re entitled to that opinion, and I don’t think it’s a crazy one, but reasonable people can disagree.

The “snakes” who dislike Gillispie are misguided, to my mind, to be judging at this early stage-but are they really so different from the outspoken anti-Tubby types? If those fans who hollered for Smith to be fired are entitled to their opinion (and although I mostly disagreed with them, I thought to a degree that they were overly demonized in some quarters-fans surely have the right to disapprove of a coach if they want without being called out as racist morons hurting the program-the coach gets paid the big bucks and it’s part of the job to take the criticism along with the acolades), then surely the anti-Gillispie folks are entitled to their opinion too without being deemed snakes-right? Certainly the rumor-mongering people alluded to in the LH article are assholish snakes, but vicious out-of-bounds stuff was said about Tubby too. There are jerks and good guys on both sides of most issues.

I can certainly agree with this sentiment: “Would people just please let this man do his job?” Amen. I’m excited to see the man do his job, and I think he’ll be great. I’m so glad to see that the outlandish rumors that were everywhere at the start of the season are letting up. It must have been so hard for Gillispie to concentrate on coaching with all that mess going down. He must have a very thick skin. Maybe this trial by fire he got will make him a better coach in the long run.

Good LH article, by the way. It would have been nice to see the crap addressed and debunked while it was going down, but better late than never I guess.

by blue kentucky girl on May 20, 2008 12:36 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Yes

Patterson’s parents told me (in Columbia SC back on March 5th) that PP was going to come to UK if Tubby had stayed. Jai Lucas’ Dad tole me (at O’Hare Airport on September 28th) that Jai would have attended UK if Tubby had stayed.

by FortyYearCatFan on May 19, 2008 7:26 PM EDT   0 recs

i've got to ask

is there any story/person/event in which you don’t know a guy or that someone close to whoever didn’t tell you something that shows that tubby did no wrong?

and i like tubby! but one word against him, and it’s “well, this guy said this…” as if that made it fact.

GO BIG BLUE!! GO BIG BLUE!!

by UKWildCatFanatic on May 19, 2008 11:52 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Jai Lucas

McDonalds A-A. Parade A-A. Likely All-SEC (someday) at Florida. UK needs a true PG. Lucas is one.

by FortyYearCatFan on May 20, 2008 10:15 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Not my favorite player but...

But we could have used him last year and this upcoming year. We really didn’t have a healthy pure point all last season and won’t have one next season unless Gillispie can pull a 1 out of his hat.

by EEWildcat on May 21, 2008 1:26 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

IMO

Lucas turned out to be quite over-rated.

by kentuckygirl0724 on May 21, 2008 7:41 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Anything But That

Lucas is and will be a very solid PG at Florida. Would have been a dandy Cat, too.

by FortyYearCatFan on May 21, 2008 11:08 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

I think that's right ...

... he was not on the level of a Nick Calathes, but he was solid if unspectacular last year.

He’ll be a nice player at Florida.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Truzenzuzex on May 22, 2008 8:43 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

OPINION

It is my OPINION that Lucas was over-rated. That means that he did not perform to the level that I had pictured in MY mind.

by kentuckygirl0724 on May 22, 2008 10:34 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Yes

Lots of them.

But that’s what they said that night in Columbia. i have a mutual friend (of theirs) who is UK law school grad and lives in Charleston WV. Their sons played basketball against each other in the summers.

by FortyYearCatFan on May 20, 2008 6:18 AM EDT   0 recs

Gillispie vs. Tubby Part 2...

Yes folks, we can agree to disagree. That is what this site is all about. I just want Kentucky basketball to return to the status it used to have. We are currently a shadow of our former selves. I went through the worst year in Rupp’s career (13-13) while I was at UK and still was never as frustrated as I have been the last three years of Tubby’s tenure. Why? Because I also saw greatness in that same span of time and I had seen it since my childhood.

I have absolutely nothing against Tubby Smith personally and was cheering for him whenever I saw Minnesota on TV this past year. My problem with Tubby was that he could not recruit or discipline well enough and that from the time he took over what was essentially Pitino’s team (which won the NCAA Tournamant), he and UK basketball never got any better or close to equal. We sort of went downward, slowly, at about a 33 degree angle.

I don’t know the facts about Patrick Patterson, but I do know his father told Gillispie that he was his (BG’s) “biggest fan.” I also know that Patrick wanted to be close to home. Incidentally, I would say that Duke is not like going to school on the moon. I don’t really think Patterson seriously considered Florida and is probably glad he didn’t given Donovan’s wishy-washy Orlando Magic affair. He will heal physically, have help next year and realize his dreams at Kentucky. He is a total team player.

by craggycat on May 20, 2008 7:47 PM EDT   0 recs

Frustrated In 2005?

UK was 28-6 and came within an eyelash of FF appearance with Top 5 ranked team. 2006 was a subpar year, no doubt.

The 2007 UK team was 15-3 midway through the season but finished 7-9 the rest of the way. That was frustrating.

The 2003 team (32-4, #1 AP poll) was close, if not the equal of the 1998 team (35-4, #1 in final poll). The 2003-04-05 teams were 87-15 and close, if not equal to the 1998 team.

by FortyYearCatFan on May 20, 2008 10:19 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

2004 is when I lost my religion

This is way off topic but…

I’ll agree that 2003 was a championship-ready team, had Bogans not been injured. They were definitely on par with the 1998 team when they were healthy.

But 04 and 05?

2004 was the year that did it in for me. Since we got off Eddie Sutton Tournament Probation, I pretty much thought (incorrectly or not!) “Hey, Kentucky has a chance to win it all” every year, up through 2003. There were some definite disappointments in there, but I was able to keep the faith. But then 2004 came, and it started to look like we were trying to find a way to lose, not find a way to win. Even though we had a lot of wins, it just really all seemed broken to me. I still watched every game I could and cheered for the cats, but I didn’t have any hopes of an NCAA Final Four despite being the #1 seed some years. The loss of hope was the main downer, capped off by the train wreck that was the UAB loss in a very winnable game.

In retrospect, I think a lot of Kentucky’s regular season success from 2001-2005 was due to a weak SEC. And some of the weak ACC foes in non-conference play (like UNC after Dean Smith but before Roy Williams, for instance) likewise contributed around that time period. It wasn’t until the NCAA tournament that we got exposed by not living up to our seedings. Can anyone remember us upsetting someone in the NCAA tournament? (9 seed over 8 seed doesn’t count). I don’t know the stats and my memory’s not so good, so I could be wrong. And of course in 2006 and 2007 we really got it handed to us by Florida, Vandy, and Chris Lofton.

Now, I’m not saying Tubby couldn’t have brought us back around – I think he could have if he so chose. I love Tubby’s 2006-2007 freshman class and was hopeful they would be the standard bearers in bringing the hope of NCAA success back. And I was sorry to see Tubby leave us. But now that he’s gone… Maybe it’s Gillispie, maybe it’s watching the last remnants of the 2004 class turn things around last season, or maybe it’s just change in general, but I’m happy to have some hope back for the program now.

by EEWildcat on May 21, 2008 1:24 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

2004 Team

For that squad to go 27-5, win SEC, earn #1 overall NCAA seed (etc) was AMAZING. I had no complaints about that team. Erik’s uncle and I shake our heads in wonder every time we remember that season.

http://kenpom.com/confrank.php?y=2001 SEC was #1 (best overall RPI) conference in 2001, 2002, and 2003. #2 in 2004. And #5 in 2005. Collectively THE BEST conference over those 5 seasons (based on overall RPI).

UK upset no one in 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, or 2008 NCAA tourneys. Only in 1998 (Duke) did UK score an upset.

UK will change its coach at least every 10 years. Hall, Sutton, Pitino, and Tubby are 4 in just 35 years (post Rupp).

by FortyYearCatFan on May 21, 2008 11:15 PM EDT   0 recs

I wouldn't ...

... necessarily infer that coaching changes will happen every ten years. Pitino could have stayed as long as he wanted.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Truzenzuzex on May 22, 2008 8:45 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

I Think So

Pitino would have been burned out in a couple more years.

His recruiting had tailed off. Magloire and Evans in 1996. Hogan, Anthony, and Bradley in 1997. Verbals from Blevins and Jaron Brown in 1998. Far cry from UK recruiting in 1992-93-94-95.

10 years at UK is all most can handle. The program has averaged 25 W (post Rupp). Very few coaches can do that over a long term.

by FortyYearCatFan on May 22, 2008 9:02 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

2004 Great Regular Season Accomplishments

No doubt. Kudos to Tubby and the team for that. (Erik Daniels is my #2 all time favorite UK player, BTW, long live the “crazy shot”!!)
But I just couldn’t get it out of the back of my head “we are going to find some way to fumble early in the NCAA tournament, again” and unfortunately it happened. There was a ton of talent on the team and it just looked like Tubby had lost control. Trying to run with UAB in the NCAA tournament was a prime example. You know Tubby is too smart to try to run with a “40 minutes of hell” Nolan Richardson apprentice team. Especially when we played 2 days before. But there we were doing it – and looking very worn out for the crucial end minutes of the game. Maybe this is subjective and not quantifiable with statistics, but it was just my experience as a UK fan wanting UK and Tubby to succeed.

Yeah, the SEC had the best overall RPI then – it was the best conference top-to-bottom bar none. It was a big pastime of mine at the time to take off work and watch the whole SEC tournament. It was just great, competitive basketball. But it was mostly good, but not outstanding teams – and Kentucky. No SEC team reached the final four in that time period, and other than Kentucky, I don’t believe there were many (if any) elite 8s either. So the SEC was good in the early season OOC schedule (so had a good RPI), but didn’t seem to follow through with that level of success in the post-season. Kentucky took care of business during the regular season in that year (as it should) but couldn’t seem to make as deep a run in the tourney as you might have thought from their seed and/or API poll rating (2003 excepted, again).

Don’t forget, those conference overall RPIs counted Kentucky – I was talking about the whole rest of the SEC being weak. Kentucky had a massive RPI in that time period, which would definitely skew the results for the SEC as a whole.

And yes, the early 90’s early NCAA exits were disappointing too, but the fans got sweet consolation in the 1996, 1997, and 1998 awesome finishes. A decade later, 2006, 2007, 2008, on the other hand, didn’t make up for the early exits in 2001-2005.

Thanks for the good discussion.

by EEWildcat on May 22, 2008 10:28 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Only Early Exit In 1990's Was 1994

2001 and 2002 were Sweet 16. 2003 and 2005 were Elite 8. Only 2004 was “early” exit really.

Early 1980’s saw 3 straight early exits – 1980, 81, 82 – then Elite 8 and FF to follow. Ya never know.

by FortyYearCatFan on May 22, 2008 9:07 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

upsets

i think you’ll see very few upsets by UK in the tourney, mainly because who can you upset when you have a #1 seed? even as a 2, beating a 1 isn’t what i call an upset. so you’ll see very few upsets for UK…and UNC, Duke, UCLA, etc.

GO BIG BLUE!! GO BIG BLUE!!

by UKWildCatFanatic on May 22, 2008 9:37 AM EDT   0 recs

1985 Upsets

UK beat conference champs Washington and UNLV as #12 seed. It happens. Rarely.

by FortyYearCatFan on May 22, 2008 9:03 PM EDT   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

An exciting user-driven SBNation blog, by and for fans of the Kentucky Wildcats.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Donovan Strikes Gold

Recent FanPosts

Small
Billy Packer is fired from CBS and NCAA tourney!
Small
Lorenzen Waived by the Giants
Tru_small
Comment on A Sea of Blue newsfeed articles
Small
Roburt Sallie Headed To Memphis
Small
Clarence Trent looking at University of Kentucky, Arkansas, Florida among others...
Small
Roburt Sallie a uk wildcat....according to facebook?
Duke_small
UK Baseball: Cohen leaves; Henderson Promoted
Small
BIG BLUE MADNESS
Tru_small
ASoB Technology Update

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Managing Editor

Tru_small Truzenzuzex

Author

Small Ken Howlett

18279_160_small TheFakeGimelMartinez

ad

Site Meter