Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Lance Berkman Could Have Torn ACL

Miami 73, Kentucky 67: Post Mortem

Btn_ball_medium Btn_book_medium

First things first.  Congratulations to the Miami Hurricanes on a well-earned and well-deserved victory.  They were the more focused and mature team, and even though UK really tested them at the end, they proved that they deserved to be ranked by coming in to Rupp Arena and beating the 'Cats fair and square.  Well done, noble victory.

OK.  This next bit is a "stream of consciousness" rant because I had a lot mentally invested in this game, and my return was ... poor.

I am sick and tired of losing these kinds of games.  SickAndTired.  I want this team to perform, and what I see on the floor is unacceptable all to often.  I don't give one tiny hoot who plays well in practice and who doesn't.  I'm done defending Michael Porter starting.  I don't care if Porter is tough enough to walk through a brick wall, knock back a quart of whiskey and jump off the Empire State building and walk away with only cuts and bruises.  He isn't a good enough basketball player to start for Kentucky.  That is a fact.  It is not an opinion.

If Gillispie continues to start him, I absolutely guarantee criticism.  I don't care one whit what Gillispie thinks anymore, I am done with this nonsense.  There is absolutely no excuse for starting Porter over Liggins, and if Gillispie can't figure that out , I plan to give him a lot of help.  I know coach is a self-styled not-so-smart hard case, but it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out what went wrong in the first five minutes, and I am no longer willing to grant him any latitude at all on this subject.

I really like Michael Porter, I do.  I want him to play.  He is a great kid who deserves to play, and brings valuable things to the team.  But we have to stop making excuses for bad coaching decisions, and starting Porter with half an eye closed over Liggins, who is simply the best point guard UK has had since Rondo, no longer makes any sense to anyone whatsoever.  Therefore, it is no longer defensible as far as I am concerned, all other things remaining equal.  If this was punishment for his misbehavior in Vegas, fine.  From now on, no more.

End tirade.

Now, for the post mortem.  The bottom line is, Kentucky lost this game in the first 15 minutes.  They did it by utterly failing to do the most fundamental things well, especially hustling after the ball and getting it into the post.  In the second half, they were great, just great.  But the first half had absolutely no resemblance whatsoever to Kentucky basketball.

I grant that the Hurricanes were extremely hot in the first half, but that isn't enough of an excuse for me to forgive a 20-point deficit at halftime.  If Gillispie can't motivate his charges to play hard in the first 20 minutes, he needs to hire any one of about 50,000 Wildcat fans who have lived and died with this program.  I guarantee any one of them could motivate these kids to drink battery acid and urinate blue Gatorade.

Here are my obvservations, and keep in mind, in case you haven't figured it out yet, that I am not a happy 'Cat fan:

  • Darius Miller -- if you aren't going to shoot the ball, get the hell out of the game.  We need you to take shots when you are open.  If you miss, we will forgive you as long as it was a good shot.
  • Patrick Patterson -- Post up strong!  Every time!  Without you getting the ball, we cannot win, and half of getting you the ball is up to you.
  • Jodie Meeks -- When your shot is off, drive the ball into the lane.  Sometimes, it won't fall, but we need you to score.
  • DeAndre Liggins -- Shoot when you're open.  Try to manufacture shots for others, not yourself.  That's what point guards do.  Also, take about 50 MPH off your passes.  Yes, they are open, but this is not football.  You don't get extra bonus points for hitting them harder.
  • Perry Stevenson -- Learn to make the corner jumper and we will do better.
  • Josh Harrellson -- Keep trying.  You have the right idea, just keep trying harder.
  • Kevin Galloway -- For God's sake, son, make the  simple pass.
  • Our defense in the first half was utterly matador.
  • Our defense in the second half was outstanding.
  • Jack McClinton barely scored in the second half.  Why do we have to wait until the second half to do what we should be doing?
  • Patterson and Stevenson -- Dunk the damn ball!  Every time!  If you bounce one off the rim and into the top row, consider yourself forgiven.
  • Billy Gillispie -- Surely, surely you can make adjustments without having to wait until the second half to descend into a tirade.  Surely.

I confess, I am not a happy Wildcat fan.  This is a game we should have won, but we lost because of bad coaching decisions early in the game and an unacceptably low intensity until the second half.  This is silly, bush-league basketball, always having to fight out of a huge hole.  Where is the Kentucky basketball I saw against Lamar??

I am sick of hearing Gillispie tell us it's his fault -- Note to Billy:  Damn Skippy it is!  Frankly, I am sick of losing, period.  This team is talented enough to win against all but the very best.  An occasional loss to a more experienced opponent is forgivable, but this was a failure from the outset, and I am sick and tired of spotting teams 10-20 points and trying to overcome that deficit.  I place that blame squarely where it belongs -- on the coach.

I want Kentucky basketball back, and by God, I want it right now!

Comment 139 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Tru... I agree with everything you've written...!

and especially this quote…

Patterson and Stevenson — Dunk the damn ball! Every time! If you bounce one off the rim and into the top row, consider yourself forgiven.

My GOD, I wish i was that tall and got the ball THAT close to the rim… I would try to break it EVERY time…! lol

Steelers fan 1st! UK is my 2nd love.

by vinceuk1 on Dec 6, 2008 9:27 PM EST reply actions  

Only it should be Patterson and Harrellson, not Stevenson.

In the land of the big beef, Stevenson cannot hold his own. I think Harrellson needs a shot. His stats are equal to Perry’s even though he is playing half the minutes. Give him more PT and see if he doubles Perry. It would be nice to see that happen. If these guys are knocking Perry around, look out for the SEC. Perry needs to come off the bench.

by Blueobsessed on Dec 6, 2008 10:38 PM EST up reply actions  

I Second...

…that emotion. In fact, I agree with everything you said…with one huge exception. This team does not have the talent to win against all but the very best. Porter can’t play D-1 point guard…period. Stevenson is a scared, slow-footed stiff with no offensive moves to save his life. We have no legit center, as Patterson is a power forward being forced to play out of position. Finally, Meeks has a nice shot, but all too often looks to shoot first and pass much, much later. Liggins and Miller are talented, but green. Harrelson at least tries to score when he gets the ball (take note Perry), but he doesn’t have the foot speed to compete with faster players outside the paint. Bottom line, Tru, we do not have top-20 talent, not yet, and certainly not now. Frankly, to avoid all of that frustration you are obviously feeling, I can only (and respectfully) suggest that you lower your expectations considerably regarding this young and incredibly inconsistent team. Either that, or hit the brown water early and often before our next game.

That’s all I’m saying.

by tooblue on Dec 6, 2008 9:38 PM EST reply actions  

Lucas

Would be the starting PG at UK right now.

by FortyYearCatFan on Dec 6, 2008 9:39 PM EST up reply actions  

disagree...

…from what I’ve seen of Lucas, Liggins is head & shoulders above him…

But he would make a damn good back up come January next year…

Steelers fan 1st! UK is my 2nd love.

by vinceuk1 on Dec 6, 2008 9:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Liggins...

is much better than Lucas….you have no argument here

by the spork on Dec 6, 2008 10:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Lucas

Screw Lucas..he WENT to Florida……he’s going somewhere else now….why not just say the kid who left for Illinois would be the starting pg right now?? i mean who cares? they arent here and didnt want to be here so big friggin deal… i dont even wanna see their friggin names!!!

" I believe in pipedreams"

by Magnoliacat on Dec 7, 2008 1:36 AM EST up reply actions  

Legion Is SG

Jasper was PG.

Yes, transfers hurt.

by FortyYearCatFan on Dec 7, 2008 7:58 AM EST up reply actions  

Not that young...
….regarding this young …

Folks, the team is not that young. Look around…the days of having senior dominated teams is over. I wouldn’t give Billy any slack in this area. They certainly are inconsistent but it’s not due to youth.

'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'

by HozeKing on Dec 7, 2008 12:15 AM EST up reply actions  

Amen to that.

Porter was absolutely horrible today. There is no other way to spin it.

by tooblue on Dec 6, 2008 9:41 PM EST reply actions  

Concussion, 10 Stitches, Eye Swollen Half Shut

What do you expect of him? He shouldn’t have been asked to play AT ALL today.

by FortyYearCatFan on Dec 6, 2008 9:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Admire Porter

I admire Porter’s toughness and character, but I agree, he needed a day off.

by EEWildcat on Dec 7, 2008 8:20 AM EST up reply actions  

I Agree

The fact that he started and played as much as he did speaks volumes regarding this team’s lack of top-20 talent. Liggins is far and away the better option.

By the way, I admire Porter for his grittiness, but that alone does not a point guard make.

by tooblue on Dec 6, 2008 9:49 PM EST reply actions  

Spot on Tru...

I’d have to go back and watch the first half again to be sure, but I don’t remember Patterson posting up with any authority in the first half. It seems to me that playing Patterson in the high post is negating his strength. He’s an excellent passer, but to spend practically the entire first half there is unacceptable. I thought in the second half he did a better job of balancing the high/low post and it showed.

I think we really missed Ramon’s defense tonight. We’ll never know if having him on the floor would have changed the outcome of the game, but it would have been nice to have had him.

by Iam4UKinMI on Dec 6, 2008 9:56 PM EST reply actions  

The Only "Top 20" Talent Lacking

Is the coaching staff. They may get there but not yet.

UK has talented players.

by FortyYearCatFan on Dec 6, 2008 9:56 PM EST reply actions  

Talented? Yes...

But, they are not talented enough to be a top 20 team. Not now, and probably not for this season. Time to face the music.

by tooblue on Dec 6, 2008 10:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Sure They Are

UK has 9 or 10 very talented players.

The coaching staff, maybe not. Gillispie is still learning (OJT).

by FortyYearCatFan on Dec 6, 2008 10:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Heh.

I think you’re right.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Dec 7, 2008 12:05 AM EST up reply actions  

Talent

There is talent EVERYWHERE! Miami, Fla. has TALENT. These guys havent played together very long at all…im no coach or been around the game for 50 years BUT doesnt it take time for TALENT to mesh? I dont like losing anymore than the next guy but my gosh. Louisville has TALENT but didnt they get WAXED by WKU? Isnt Ricky P. “supposed” to be “the man” What happened there..TALENT + GREAT COACH = GOT WAXED and i mean WAXED!!!

" I believe in pipedreams"

by Magnoliacat on Dec 7, 2008 1:42 AM EST up reply actions  

He Makes Mistakes

Like he did at UTEP or TAMU. He’s coaching on an entirely different stage now. The mistakes are magnified at UK.

by FortyYearCatFan on Dec 7, 2008 8:00 AM EST up reply actions  

Good night all

You will wake up in the morning and feel better.

Kentucky Basketball is not dead…just many inexperienced on the team at this point against a very experienced Miami team. I for one did not expect a win, even though Forty predicted. I am realistic for this year. Go Cats!

by kykat51 on Dec 6, 2008 10:13 PM EST reply actions  

I Did And It SHOULD Have Been W Not L

Horrible 1st half, down 20.

UK is better than Miami in Rupp Arena.

by FortyYearCatFan on Dec 6, 2008 10:16 PM EST up reply actions  

I hate to break it to you Forty...

but Tubby couldn’t do any better with this team. Expectations need to become more realistic for this young, inexperienced group of players. The bottom line is that we got beat by a better, more experienced, and MORE talented team tonight. That’s why they are ranked in the top 25, and we are not.

by tooblue on Dec 6, 2008 10:17 PM EST reply actions  

I don't care about Tubby ...

… or Adolph Rupp or any other coach. Who knows what they could do? I don’t, and don’t care — it is an exercise in such manifest, blind speculation that it is utterly meaningless.

I do know what good coaching looks like. And what I saw out there tonight was not it.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Dec 7, 2008 12:07 AM EST up reply actions  

AGREE ABOUT COACHING

Here we are, a year and a half into BCG’s tenure and I for one am still undecided if he is a good coach or not! I see flashes but no consistency. I see a stubborness that borders on arrogance. I see an ability to motivate, albeit mostly in the second halves but a team that comes out unprepared in the first half. I see no ability to adjust to game conditions, e.g. perhaps switching up defenses, perhaps play a little zone when the other teams guards are much quicker than us!!!!!!!. I still question the wisdom of game day practices (are these still going on?) which I think contribute to dead legs, which contribute to poor shooting (Jodie Meeks).

After a year and a half, I have doubts.

by Bluegilla on Dec 7, 2008 9:35 AM EST up reply actions  

Good Points All

Rupp was an instant success at UK in 1930. Never a doubt about him.

Joe Hall, there were doubts in his second year.

Eddie Sutton was looking good early in his second season.

Rick Pitino, had success in his second year but nothing like the mid 1990’s.

Tubby, more successful (early) than any of the above except Rupp.

Gillispie is a good, young coach. Whether he becomes a great coach, the jury is still out.

by FortyYearCatFan on Dec 7, 2008 9:41 AM EST up reply actions  

Carpe Diem
…young, inexperienced group of players…

…oh, good grief. I will write it again, if you are expecting this team to mature into a bunch of seniors and juniors good luck. It is highly likely that PPat will leave this year, and maybe Jodie. You better expect more and not rely on the crutch of calling them a bunch of inexperienced and young players…heck, Liggins is 20 yrs old.

'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'

by HozeKing on Dec 7, 2008 12:21 AM EST up reply actions  

Enough....

I will take this TEAM and COACH come March. They are young and inexperienced playing TOGETHER…did not the USA olympic team in 2004 get a silver medal? The BEST players in the WORLD LOST???? AHHHHH ..could of been the inexperience of not PLAYING TOGETHER….but whatever.

" I believe in pipedreams"

by Magnoliacat on Dec 7, 2008 1:47 AM EST up reply actions  

TOTALLY Agree

When THIS team and THIS coach do gel – there will be no stopping them. And once the wins, final fours, AND championships start rolling in, oh wont the “bandwagon” be full then.

by kentuckygirl0724 on Dec 7, 2008 10:12 PM EST up reply actions  

FF And Championships

I’ll be happy with 1 of each.

The only time in my 57 year lifetime that they “rolled in” was 1993-98.

Before that, it was 1946-51 (before I was born).

by FortyYearCatFan on Dec 8, 2008 6:32 AM EST up reply actions  

What Does OTS Have To Do With It???

Pitino won 22 regular season games with young, inexperienced players in 1990-91.

Tubby won 28 games with young, inexperienced players in 2004-05.

by FortyYearCatFan on Dec 6, 2008 10:30 PM EST reply actions  

No, Facts Trump Your Theory

Young, inexperienced players can W lots of games.

They did at UK (as SEC best record) in 1991 season. And (SEC champs and/or SECT champs in) 2000, 2001, and 2005 seasons.

No excuses.

by FortyYearCatFan on Dec 6, 2008 10:46 PM EST up reply actions  

No Excuses for What?

It wasn’t the coach who made all those turnovers and missed all those shots…it was the players. You can blame the current coach all you want, and cite as many historical facts as you want regarding PAST coaches and PAST teams, but that will not change the fact that this year’s team—regardless of the coach— is not talented enough to compete consistently against top 20 teams.

Good night all… .

by tooblue on Dec 6, 2008 10:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Certainly Players Made Mistakes

Who puts them into the games? Who takes them out?

If it were all on the players, who needs a coach?

by FortyYearCatFan on Dec 7, 2008 8:01 AM EST up reply actions  

Thank you, FYCF

'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'

by HozeKing on Dec 7, 2008 12:21 AM EST up reply actions  

So will BCG

With our cup cake non-conference schedule, and a weak SEC, BCG will probably win 20+ games this year as well. However, the point I am trying (perhaps inartfuly) to make is that—regardless of the coach— this year’s Cats are simply not talented enough to compete on a consistent basis with top-20 teams.

by tooblue on Dec 6, 2008 10:40 PM EST reply actions  

not talented enough???????

are you kidding me? This is one darn talented team. The most talent I have seen in YEARS!

by tenken on Dec 6, 2008 11:27 PM EST up reply actions  

This team ...

… has plenty of talent. Plenty. Yes, they will lose games because they are young, but this should not have been one of them.

We have more than enough talent to beat Miami at home in Rupp Arena. Way more than enough. The problem is, it either wasn’t on the floor enough or couldn’t figure out how to play fundamental basketball.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Dec 7, 2008 12:09 AM EST up reply actions  

Don't Agree. . .

we have more talent & athleticism in this team than we have had in years. However, we are not the most basketball savvy I have seen. I see more bad decisions made by this team every game, like horrible passes to someone covered up, dribbling into a corner & picking up their dribble, leaving the other teams hottest shooter wide open for a 3. That my friends comes down to preparation which comes down to coaching!

by Bluegilla on Dec 7, 2008 9:41 AM EST up reply actions  

Patterson, Meeks, Liggins, Miller, Stevenson

All talented players who made one or more HS All-American teams.

Harrellson, Galloway, Porter, Harris, Carter, Stewart were All-Staters in HS.

I’m not sure why Donald Williams is on the roster (since he never plays).

UK better win 25 games this year.

by FortyYearCatFan on Dec 7, 2008 9:48 AM EST up reply actions  

Stats have very little to do with reality

I know that is a big concept to grasp. Stats are historical and can only be used as one piece in the equation when making a current judgement. When the real world relies only on stats it is a quatrain for the foretelling of disaster.

What we are seeing is a giant who had really good stats a few years ago. The best? No. Bad? No. Was there a group of new guys doing it better and growing better and more solid with each passing day? Absolutely! Was the giant still respected as one of the giants? Yes but not as one of the “best” anymore. The stats showed no reason for alarm unless you happened to see them as reason for alarm.

There were people in charge as new ways to do the job were being introduced and learned by all those “new giants” that were simply not getting done and not implemented. The word was coming down from higher chairs to do these new things and the man in charge did not do them. More money was poured in with the understanding that things would be made better with the investment. The stats did not and do not show this. They showed a giant doing well in most regards in a time when “parity” was the buzz word and a false idea that “We created this. We are fine. We will always be a giant.”

Now all of the sudden, the lid falls off and those stats become fantastic “facts” and great talking points but reality “on the ground” is telling another story. The giant was in fact, outside of stats, falling slowly behind.

And that is why GM and the rest of the American auto industry is asking for a bailout.

Wait, this was supposed to be about UK. Or was it?

Changing how you think will change what you think.

by wilson452 on Dec 6, 2008 10:59 PM EST reply actions  

Yes Porter did not play well

…but why is nobody complaining about Meeks? He was playing the matador defense on McClinton in the first half and had a horrible shooting night. He couldn’t hit the side of a barn. Meeks is just not All-Sec material and he needs to stop thinking that he is Kobe. If he had just hit a couple more of those threes or had made passes to players that were more open then we wouldn’t be sitting around gnashing our teeth and doing double shots of Jack Daniel’s (because we can’t look at the bourbon bottle right now).

Del Tha Funky Homosapien
formerly known as senowen

by Mr. Bob Dobalina on Dec 6, 2008 11:18 PM EST reply actions  

I am complaining about Meeks, and Gillispie, and Patterson, and Stevenson, and Porter and ..

What was all that standing around, and shooting only 3 point shots? Is Meeks afraid he will sit on the bench if he, I don’t know, actually drives into the lane and gets fouled, where he is like an 85% free throw shooter? For heaven’s sake, basketball just isn’t that complicated a game.

Good grief, this makes no sense to me. If I were Gillispie, I would have threatened Meeks with consignment to clean-up crew if he didn’t get in the lane and get fouled. Liggins had no problem figuring that out, and he’s just a freshman, for God’s sake. I think he is the only guard who actually shot a free throw all night long!

What the hell!???

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Dec 6, 2008 11:50 PM EST up reply actions  

EXACTLY!!!!!!

When I was in the 4th grade my grade-school basketball coach told me that you simply
HAVE to penetrate a zone.

I’m now in my mid-30s and I STILL HAVEN’T FORGOTTEN that. I havent; played organized basketball since I was 17 and played as a junior in high school.

Are you teling me these guys haven’t been taught this BASIC, FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLE of basketball? This is CHAPTER ONE material.

by VentDependent on Dec 7, 2008 2:12 AM EST up reply actions  

To Tru

I understand your frustration. I truly truly do. But can you see the improvement? I can. In the measure of success of a program is how have we improved. Liggins has greatly improved as well as others. Porter needs to go though. I totally agree with you on that. I am so sick of mediocre Kentucky too. But an awesome Kentucky team will take longer to rebuild then we thought. But I do think we are on the way up not down.

by tenken on Dec 6, 2008 11:25 PM EST reply actions  

Truly ...

… I can see improvement.

I am frustrated that we are not putting the best team on the floor. Yes, Meeks had a bad night, but he exacerbated that by simply failing to do anything else. Porter just isn’t able to effectively initiate the offense. He isn’t a bad player, he just isn’t a real point guard, and sooner or later we just have to face that fact. He is doing all he can, but he is overmatched and out of position.

And that is the coach’s fault. Period.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Dec 6, 2008 11:36 PM EST up reply actions  

....and he hasn't recruited a point guard either

'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'

by HozeKing on Dec 7, 2008 12:24 AM EST up reply actions  

Liggis = Point Guard??

…I don’t think Liggins is any more of a classic point guard than Jasper. Of course, they can do a better job than Porter. But from what I have seen at this point is that Liggins is a shoot first, second, third, then pass fourth. He also doesn’t have the speed that a Top 10 teams need at this position.

My definition of a point guard that Kentucky should demand would be someone like Derrick Rose or Wayne Ellington. If you want to settle for Liggins…go ahead….but I can’t think of a recent top rated team that was lead by a point forward which is really what Liggins is….

'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'

by HozeKing on Dec 7, 2008 12:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Your perception ...

… is not correct.

Liggins is a pass first point guard. The reason he took so many shots last night is that he is a freshman, and trying to make plays that simply aren’t there. You need your point guard to get into the lane and create (Meeks certainly wasn’t doing it, nor Porter). The jacked-up threes mostly came late in the game, and that’s just a freshman being a freshman.

You don’t “settle” for a 5* point guard. You play him.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Dec 7, 2008 1:18 PM EST up reply actions  

My perception is NOT correct?

Where am I wrong?

1. That Liggins is a ‘classic point guard’.
2. That he is a shooter first and passer second?
3. He doesn’t have then necessary speed to be a top notch point guard?

Make no mistake of my position….Liggins needs to start as this year’s point guard. He is by far the best for this spot this year. I do think he is more of a point forward. I just don’t think he is the point guard that UK needs to be really good going forward.

'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'

by HozeKing on Dec 7, 2008 1:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Liggins ...
  • is a classic, pass first point guard
  • is not a shooter first and passer second
  • has more than sufficient speed to be a top notch point guard.

Ergo, you are wrong on every single one of your points without exception.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Dec 7, 2008 3:40 PM EST up reply actions  

As you are want to say...

…we will just have to agree to disagree. Or admit, that our standards are just different.

'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'

by HozeKing on Dec 7, 2008 3:46 PM EST up reply actions  

We'll ...

… agree to disagree. No problem with that.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Dec 7, 2008 3:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Liggins is absolutely NOT a shooter first and passer second.

You couldn’t be more wrong on point 2. He was knocked down one star by rivals because he didn’t shoot enough. He is absolutely a pass first guard. Was the Miami game the first time you’ve been able to see him play?

He only has 12 more field goal ATTEMPTS than he has total assists on the season.

by BBallSophist on Dec 7, 2008 6:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Dream on....

……if you want to make an argument that Liggins is a classic point guard in the mold of a Rose or Ellington, go ahead. Good luck.

'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'

by HozeKing on Dec 9, 2008 7:49 AM EST up reply actions  

No luck involved.

Your use of the term “classic” may be subject to interpretation, but there is no doubt whatever Liggins is a pass-first point guard. More in the mold of a Magic Johnson (i.e. big point guard) than a Rose.

Ellington is not a point guard, by the way, I’m sure you meant Ty Lawson.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Dec 9, 2008 8:36 AM EST up reply actions  

Liggins

Played PG in Chicago HS play. Natural PG if not “classic” one.

by FortyYearCatFan on Dec 9, 2008 11:00 AM EST up reply actions  

I didn't say anything about "classic point guard"...

…or Rose…or Ellington.

I said he’s not a shooter first and passer second. He is a pass-first guard. End of story.

by BBallSophist on Dec 9, 2008 12:29 PM EST up reply actions  

LOL

Thats funny.

" I believe in pipedreams"

by Magnoliacat on Dec 7, 2008 1:51 AM EST up reply actions  

About...

Hozekings comment…not UKWildCatFanatic.

" I believe in pipedreams"

by Magnoliacat on Dec 7, 2008 1:52 AM EST up reply actions  

I agree

with you on that. I am wondering though if part of Liggin’s punishment is Porter starting instead of him? I don’t know. I am very perplexed on this too. It makes no sense whatsoever.

by tenken on Dec 7, 2008 12:31 AM EST up reply actions  

Howdy, friends!

Nice to see Tru be his clinical, even-keeled self. :) Just kidding, Tru. This was a big game, and the first half was a repeat of the lackluster defensive Kentucky effort we’ve seen in 1st halves for around 3 years now. I totally understand your despair.

I’m not really too pissed off about this game. I’m more worried about tomorrow’s game. We’re going to have one of two things: 1) a Kentucky team that comes out FIRED UP and torches poor Sean Wood’s charges, or 2) a Kentucky team that comes out flat and gets a scare or MORE.

Anyway, I see a few points that aren’t being talked about since everybody is gathering the verbal tar and feathers for Porter:

1) Yes, Virginia, Porter should see less playing time.

2) What we know, though, is that Billy Gillispie loves practice. I would even go as far to say that Billy thinks you can learn more from practice than from playing games. And if there is some sort of issue between Billy and Liggins about Liggins’ practice effort — I’m not saying there is, mind you — then it wouldn’t be far of a stretch to think Liggins stays on the bench for that.

3) Perry Stevenson missed a few bunnies. I wish he’d learn to love the dunk, like Jules Camara did. But, nobody should complain why Stevenson is playing significant minutes. He’s really understanding the defensive system, and he really impressed me with his individual defending. The guy he was on tonight had difficulty getting around Stevenson, and Stevenson made several good slaps at the ball. Combine that with his rebounding and his improving offense (which was, admittedly, off tonight), and he’s a solid contributor. Harrellson is still learning the defense, but is much better offensively. Its kinda a push, but don’t explicitly favor Harrellson just because he can score off the bench.

23) Meeks had a rough game. Meeks was trying to be Superman in the first half; guard McClinton, but also come down and try for strips/doubleteams/etc. You can’t slide off somebody like McClinton. Meeks couldn’t get his shot tonight on his own, which is also troubling. Of course, it doesn’t help when you’ve scored big and the Miami coaches’ gameplan involves stopping you.

4) Miller was a mixed bag. In the first half, he was just lost defensively. In almost the whole game, he was hesitant on the offense. I counted at least 3 times where the ball was swung to Miller, who was supposed to drive in and break down the defense, and he hesitated, allowing the defense to adjust. A few of Miller’s offensive decisions (shot selection, etc.) were troublesome as well. But, the kid is learning. He really stepped up his game in the second half, especially defensively. He had something like 4 assists and 3 turnovers sometime late in the second half, and 8 rebounds. That’s great for him; a little more scoring would have been awesome.

5) If its and buts were candy and nuts then we’d all have a very nice Christmas. BUT: how would have that game transpired with Ramon Harris sharing duty on McClinton and the guards? Ramon Harris experienced with the offense? Miller coming off the bench for offence and support?

by TheFakeGimelMartinez on Dec 6, 2008 11:27 PM EST reply actions  

Great points, all.

But I have reached the point where the little things matter less than the big picture. We need to field the best team immediately, just to avoid the soul-crushing fate of having to be down by 20 points at half, and trying to fight out of a deep, dark hole.

Gillispie should have pulled Mike earlier. What the hell was that about letting him foul out? I don’t get that coaching decision, it borders on the incompetent in my opinion. Everybody who knows anything about basketball aught to be scratching their heads over that.

I’m completely confused. Gillispie’s decision-making process looks like some kind of random coin-toss. At the end of the game, when we were down four, he made good calls. All I ask is for some semblance of sanity for the other 35 minutes. It has gone beyond frustrating — it’s driving me into a kind of insanity.

What the hell!!???

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Dec 6, 2008 11:44 PM EST up reply actions  

I didn't

understand that either. Porter being fouled out but if had been Liggins or any other star player he would have pulled him out. At least he knows he isn’t that good. I think FGM has a point here about Liggins/practice. Whatever he is doing to Liggins its working. He seems to be playing better and better.

by tenken on Dec 7, 2008 12:35 AM EST up reply actions  

dissapointing loss...

wow thank you soooo much for saying porter shouldn’t start. he simply isnt a UK caliber point guard and it’s time for gillispie to realize that. I think us losing harris was a big factor in losing this game because while meeks did his best against mcclinton, harris is a much better defender and if he was in the game, guarding mcclinton then he couldve either limited him to less points or at least make him work harder for the ones he did get. and does anybody know who was in charge of scheduling back to back games? lol

by hummer11092 on Dec 6, 2008 11:48 PM EST reply actions  

Look ...

… I am not ragging on Porter. I love Porter. He is great for the team, and I am glad he is here. But he just isn’t qualified for the position that Gillispie is putting him in. That is a fact. It isn’t an opinion. A blind football fan who had never heard of “basketball” could figure this out. You would think the coach of the (for now) winingest team in America could figure it out in ten seconds.

Practice be damned. I don’t care about practice, I care about results, and if Porter is earning it in practice then Gillispie needs to either throw Liggins off the team to make room for a better player or coach him up right now. Porter is great for a lot of things, but not the starting point guard spot. Enough madness!

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Dec 6, 2008 11:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Coury Rarely Played in 2006-07

And shouldn’t have played much more last season.

He was a good practice and occasional substitute in games.

Never should have been a starter.

by FortyYearCatFan on Dec 7, 2008 9:52 AM EST up reply actions  

Ken's Rant and more

Ken -

Actually my first post tonight; I decided to cool down a little and think about things before posting tonight.

Right on with your post in your “rant”. If anything, you’ve been reserved, as I’ve had basically the same thoughts for the last few games.

The only thing I’d add here (and it may have been addressed already) are comments on BCG’s post game show. I was dismayed by his comments (which I may have misinterpreted) about a lack of leadership among his players and his players’ lack of execution. Perhaps I took that the wrong way, but to me it sounded a lot like Ratino throwing his players under the bus following UofHell’s loss to WKU. I was actually confused trying to decipher his mixed message tonight, which to me came out as – "it’s my fault, but it’s the players’ fault even more.

If Gillispie has a lack of leadership on this team – that’s his fault. I’ve never coached basketball – but I’ve been in situations (a hell of a lot more serious than a basketball game) in which it was necessary to groom and mentor younger colleagues/subordinates so that they would grow into leadership positions.

Of course I was disappointed in the outcome tonight, but I think I was more disappointed in Clyde’s comments tonight. I realize he’s a relatively young coach in terms of experience, and hope he continues to grow. But as one that has been in the rank and file and also in command positions, I think he has a way to go yet – although I really think he has great promise and potential.

So ends my first and only post on tonight’s debacle. Looking forward to tomorrow night.

by ILikeBacon on Dec 6, 2008 11:54 PM EST reply actions  

Uh ...

… this is my rant. Ken probably would have melted your monitor. :-)

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Dec 6, 2008 11:55 PM EST up reply actions  

My Bad

Sorry Tru – right on still though.

by ILikeBacon on Dec 6, 2008 11:56 PM EST up reply actions  

By the way ...

… thanks for reading and commenting, and a well-thought out comment it was. You should comment more.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Dec 6, 2008 11:56 PM EST up reply actions  

almost as much as the first half

what bothered almost as much was the last 3 or so minutes of the game. UK had gotten it down 5 and Miami kept shooting and missing free throws. they were trying to give us the game and we didn’t take advantage once. they missed at least 4 straight FTs and we never once came away with points on the other end. lots of missed ooportunities in this game.

GO BIG BLUE!! GO BIG BLUE!!

by UKWildCatFanatic on Dec 7, 2008 1:23 AM EST reply actions  

Tru you are dead on.

BG is a wonderful coach in a lot of ways. But I can tell everybody one thing right now. If BG is going to start Porter over Liggens he will never survive at UK especially if he plans on starting Porter until he graduates. He is sacrificing wins and Uk fans will not tolerate it. Porter is back up at best. I don’t give a damn how hard he practices or plays. When BG had Porter and Liggens on the floor I was flabergasted and Harrelson on the bench. BG is a terrible, terrible bench coach and the head games need to stop now. Winning builds confidence, not losing.

by Grasslands1 on Dec 7, 2008 2:05 AM EST reply actions  

Porter

Tubby survived after he started Saul for two years. I agree though that I personally see Liggins getting the starting nod as a good idea… you can still groom a kid you start. You just bench him when he makes mistakes. But thats just one d-bags opinion. I would love to get in BG’s mind a walk around for a lap or two to understand the situation a little better.

by HoboKat on Dec 7, 2008 2:13 AM EST up reply actions  

Saul >>> Porter As PG

UK won the SEC both years Saul started. They won SECT one of them and made Sweet 16 that year. He played 2 years in NBDL (minor league pro basketball) after UK.

Which of those has or will Porter do as PG?

HE is a fine young man, and would be a decent reserve SG and PG (10-15 minutes PT) like he was in 2006-07 season.

by FortyYearCatFan on Dec 7, 2008 8:06 AM EST up reply actions  

Thoughts

“An occasional loss to a more experienced opponent is forgivable, but this was a failure from the outset”

That is quite a sentence. This was a MUCH more experienced opponent, and probably equally as talented. They started ALL upperclassmen and the two main reserves are seniors. They are talented, and mature, and pretty well schooled. This was a VERY tough opponent that we had a chance to beat (had we made a couple chippies). That is a positive for this team.

In my mind, the bottom line, is that we have a VERY inexperienced team. And what experience we have is not executing and not leading (Porter to a large degree, and Stevenson to a lesser). So what do you do? You groom your underclassmen and do the best you can. Billy (im guessing) is grooming Liggins, at least he thinks he is, by starting Porter and making him EARN his his playing time. Right or wrong. Im not defending it, thats just how i see it.

I still think Gillispie is doing a good job with this team though. I really do. I think we are experiencing some MAJOR growing pains. Im not sure what the previous poster meant by his comments in the post game interviews… but Coach isnt wrong. The players, when they actually were executing, dissected that 2-3 like it was a frog in 6th grade science class. It was a thing of beauty. They couldn’t maintain that for 40 minutes…. because they are young and undisciplined.

Give it time. The talent situation is correcting, the discipline situation is correcting, and the experience situation is correcting. When they pull it all together, this team (this year or next) will be scary.

by HoboKat on Dec 7, 2008 2:09 AM EST reply actions  

Ohio State Beat Them

With “young and inexperienced player” on Miami’s home court earlier this week.

Miami has 2 L – somebody else beat them, too.

by FortyYearCatFan on Dec 7, 2008 8:07 AM EST up reply actions  

Ohio State Beat Miami WITHOUT McClinton

Im not going to compare UK to Ohio State… Its a waste of time. Two different teams, two different games, two different situations. But UK did have a chance to win yesterday, and that is promising to me. We missed a lot of gimmies that we normally make, and just a poor shooting day in general… it happens. And we did it without our best defender on the floor.

I take all that as positives.

by HoboKat on Dec 7, 2008 1:32 PM EST up reply actions  

As Hobo pointed out, McClinton was out for most of the Ohio State game...

Their other loss came against UConn. They’re pretty good and experienced.

Still, we should have beaten Miami at home. If we shoot over 20% from 3, we would have won.

by BBallSophist on Dec 7, 2008 7:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Spot on..

well almost. "I really like Michael Porter, I do. I want him to play. He is a great kid who deserves to play, and brings valuable things to the team. " I like him too but I do not want to see him play, he is not SE caliber and he never should have been offered a scholarship. Not right for UK fans and frankly is not fair to Porter either. He could be logging valuable minutes for EKU.

My observation is that the talent level at UK is turning the corner but UK is not top 25 .. yet. I still truly believe by end of year UK will be a very good team and will win the SEC.

by MyBloodRunsBlue on Dec 7, 2008 2:17 AM EST reply actions  

Not SEC Caliber STARTER AT PG

But Porter was 3-time All-State guard in California. Worthy of a scholarship offer, yes.

by FortyYearCatFan on Dec 7, 2008 8:08 AM EST up reply actions  

No not worthy

not worthy at all.. from day one it was apparent he was way in over his head. Not an SEC caliber starter or backup. Once again you are wrong.

by MyBloodRunsBlue on Dec 7, 2008 9:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Absolutely Worthy Of Div I Scholarship

Not a starter. Jasper and Meeks were recruited as PG starters in 2006 class.

Remember, UK needed G recruits in 2006. Rondo, Sparks, Moss, Stockton all left UK that year.

by FortyYearCatFan on Dec 8, 2008 6:33 AM EST up reply actions  

and...

with LIggins development, UK is aboiut to have a 2 star starting lineup. I friggin hate losing that game but this team will be much better and much better sooner rather than later. I have wathed UT ad FL plat a few times and now way they are better than UK…. I am still so optimistic!

by MyBloodRunsBlue on Dec 7, 2008 2:19 AM EST reply actions  

Patterson

There were many great points but the best thing written in that post was that HALF OF GETTING PATTERSON THE BALL is UP TO PATTERSON.

Be big. Every time. Post up strong. You were better head-to-head against the reigning POY as a FRESHMAN. But you gotta WANT THE BALL. Otherwise you can enjoy four years of college (fine with me) and then the freaking D-league. And my gosh, the guy STILL had 18 and 16 or whatever and didn’t even mentally arrive until the 2nd half.

by VentDependent on Dec 7, 2008 2:22 AM EST reply actions  

Get him the ball sooner!!

Even from our seats in the rafters we could see the problem. Even when Patterson did post up strong, he was releasing way too early. I dont fault him for this though. The rest of the the team never made an effort to get him the ball, and when they did try to feed him the ball, they were about 2 seconds to late on making the entry pass. I dont know how many times tonight that Miller just stood there staring at Patterson, but wouldnt make the pass.

by jager15 on Dec 7, 2008 3:52 AM EST up reply actions  

I'm upset as well but...

I told my buddies going in that we were in for a tough game and likely a loss. Miami is ranked for a reason. Quick, mature and they play hard and tough. Anyone that thinks we should win this game more than 5 out of 10 times in Rupp needs to reexamine what we have here. We do have a young team with 3 plus players that just began playing together this year seeing major minutes. We have Porter, a shooting guard playing out of position. I think Billy should start Liggins also but then I don’t see what happens in practice everyday. Do I want to reward a guy who comes to practice and goofs off rather than work hard? Tough sell for me. But, I don’t see practice so I can’t make that judgment.

Meeks had an off night, likely due to getting schooled on the defensive end by McClinton. This is game more than any other where I think we missed Ramon Harris big time. Couple that with a hot shooting hand and our guys looking like we were running in molasses and I’m impressed we even made a run at them.

This feels like a repeat of last year, with Crawford on the bench and us losing early season games and the fans throwing fits. Let’s just hope we gel for the SEC as we did last year and make a run. Maybe we will get Miami in the NCAA and I would predict a much different outcome once we have a season under our belts for this inexperienced team.

Xbox Live Gamertag: hoopchi

by hoopchi on Dec 7, 2008 8:01 AM EST reply actions  

Ohio State Wasn't Bothered By Their Ranked Status

Young, inexperienced Buckeyes beat them in Miami earlier this week.

by FortyYearCatFan on Dec 7, 2008 8:09 AM EST up reply actions  

And it is likely...

that the loss to Ohio State actually helped focus Miami for us. Sometimes losses can be good for you.

Xbox Live Gamertag: hoopchi

by hoopchi on Dec 7, 2008 9:46 AM EST up reply actions  

not to take anything away from OSU

but no mcclinton makes for an easier team to (hopefully) beat.

GO BIG BLUE!! GO BIG BLUE!!

by UKWildCatFanatic on Dec 7, 2008 11:56 AM EST up reply actions  

Champions....

Maybe OSU will be national champions then?

" I believe in pipedreams"

by Magnoliacat on Dec 7, 2008 2:52 PM EST up reply actions  

I also ...

… knew it would be a tough game. But to watch Porter get beat over and over and over again by McClinton just drove me into a state of frenzy. It wasn’t all Mike’s fault, McClinton is just too quick for him to guard. Great coaches don’t disadvantage their players that much. They just don’t. You have to adjust your personnel to the players on the floor.

You know, I am all about the argument that we don’t see all that Gillispie sees, but there comes a point where any basketball fan has to trust what he sees right in front of him, and what I see is that even at it’s worst, this team is much better with Liggins in the game. That’s what I see. I also see that with Liggins in the game, we have a chance to win games that we would not have a chance to win otherwise.

I am done with hearing about practice. I have had it with hearing about seniority. I want victories, and I am sick of giving games away in the first five minutes because our coach thinks one of our best players hasn’t earned the right to play earlier. If he is going to discipline Liggins, announce it and I’ll be fine with it, but other than that, this craziness has to stop.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Dec 7, 2008 8:49 AM EST up reply actions  

I don't hang the 20 point halftime deficit on Porter.

Nobody was playing defense. Repeatedly Miami shooters were shooting uncontested, wide open 3’s. We looked dead to me in the first half. Don’t know why. Just did.

I don’t mind missing shots. What I did mind was our guys standing around not guarding anyone in the first half. That is inexcusable and I do take BCG to task for that. And I don’t think Porter should have even been playing. Bad call by Billy G. The guy almost got knocked out this week. Why was he even on the floor?

Either way though, that was not what lost this game. Poor defensive effort by all in the first half lost this game. In my opinion.

Xbox Live Gamertag: hoopchi

by hoopchi on Dec 7, 2008 9:54 AM EST up reply actions  

It wasn't ...

… on Porter. But the problem is, the team runs much more slowly and frankly, inefficiently when Porter is in there. Not only that, he could not defend McClinton whatsoever. McClinton blew by him at least 5 times I saw as though Porter’s feet were part of the Rupp Arena floor. He was partially responsible by his lack of ability to even slow McClinton down a little bit. He is too small and slow to recover well on defense. It wasn’t that he was a turnover machine or anything, he wasn’t.

He’s just a 6’3" defensive liability against a quick guard like McClinton.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Dec 7, 2008 9:58 AM EST up reply actions  

Why No Galloway PT?

His athleticism should have been a natural versus Miami.

by FortyYearCatFan on Dec 7, 2008 9:59 AM EST up reply actions  

He ...

… is still struggling with the system. He played for one minute and made some questionable decisions. Gillsipie clearly lacks confidence in Galloway’s decision-making.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Dec 7, 2008 10:05 AM EST up reply actions  

Agree he needs on the floor

After “The Knock” accident, there were times when we had Ligs, Galwy, Josh and Pat on the floor and DAMN we looked fluid.

Then Meeks would replace Josh and it got just “SICK” out there. Those lineups looked really cohesive to me.

A more confident Miller and the return of Ramon “Iron Dome” Harriss SHOULD spell lots of W’s.

Changing how you think will change what you think.

by wilson452 on Dec 7, 2008 2:17 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah

first time in, he got the ball on the near sideline, drove down the middle of the lane against multiple miami players and hit nothing but backboard. i’m pretty sure he came out right then.

GO BIG BLUE!! GO BIG BLUE!!

by UKWildCatFanatic on Dec 7, 2008 11:59 AM EST up reply actions  

"I am done with hearing about practice."

Allen Iverson approves.

C! A! T! S! CATS! CATS! CATS!

by NYCCats on Dec 7, 2008 11:57 AM EST up reply actions  

ROFL!

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Dec 7, 2008 12:01 PM EST up reply actions  

"Crawford on the bench and us losing early season games and the fans throwing fits."

  Good comparison! Look how great that situation worked out with Crawford! I have complete and total faith that this year’s situation will work out just as well or better! GO CATS!!

by kentuckygirl0724 on Dec 7, 2008 10:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Simply put, we need to come out strong in the first half

If we can play a good first half, we will win. We come out so shaky and unmotivated. Billy G really needs to change the warmup/game start ritual somehow. We need some more focus, strength, and energy the first half.

My god, is it too much to ask to either
1) Dunk
2) Shoot a layup
What is this business with slinging the ball at the basket and hoping it will go in? Take a SHOT, don’t just throw it up there, Mr. Stevenson and Mr. Patterson.

Also, I like Jorts too, but Stevenson was playing some very good defense in the second half. So I can see playing him.

This game was a definite giant step back from WVU and K-St. I want to see improvement, not a decline. Even considering Harris was out and not considering injured Porter, we had a poor showing by the rest of the corps, especially Meeks, who was, well, meek. Liggins was the only one who looked on course that game.

I hate losing, and we absolutely should have won this game, even down one starter and another playing with his eye held open with a headband. However, if Billy G is playing Porter instead of Liggins in order to motivate Liggins to practice better and BE better, and if it works and we’re a final-4 caliber team in March, I’ll take the loss. But at this point, we really need to worry about MAKING the tournament. Still, I’m willing to give the benefit of the doubt based on last year’s poor OOC play and very good SEC play. We’d better have a good postseason this year and next to justify the strange coaching decisions and the resulting performance.

I’m confident we’ll get better. But it really needs to be sooner rather than later if we want to go to the NCAA tournament. Let’s improve against the cupcake squad and beat UofL for a nice marquis upset.

by EEWildcat on Dec 7, 2008 8:51 AM EST reply actions  

No argument about Stevenson.
Also, I like Jorts too, but Stevenson was playing some very good defense in the second half. So I can see playing him.

He was indeed, and I am fine with Stevenson being in there. Other than a failure to offend, he had a solid game with 8 rebounds and was an imposing presence inside defensively.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Dec 7, 2008 9:54 AM EST up reply actions  

I normally have nothing but loathing for Skwara ...

… but not this time. This article is mostly dead right. Hell, it could have been derived from mine, he makes so many of the same points. I’m sure it wasn’t but it could have been.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Dec 7, 2008 9:51 AM EST up reply actions  

Who's?

Skwara…never heard of the guy…his opinion means NOTHING to me…sticks head back in sand

" I believe in pipedreams"

by Magnoliacat on Dec 7, 2008 2:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Here is the story of the game:

Miami:
3-Pt. FG% 1st Half: 7-13 53.8 2nd Half: 1-6 16.7 Game: 42.1%

Kentucky:
3-Pt. FG% 1st Half: 2-13 15.4% 2nd Half: 0-10 0.0% Game: 8.7 %

Here’s why Kentucky lost. Miami was red hot in the first half on wide open threes, but Kentucky defended the three well in the second half and caught up. Kentucky didn’t run the offense, and shot a ton of defended threes. 2 of 23. Abyssmal.

by EEWildcat on Dec 7, 2008 10:37 AM EST reply actions  

My problem is ...

… a lot of those threes should never have been taken.

Did Meeks forget that driving to the basket often results in fouls? He took the easy way out, and showed no leadership out there. Patterson was half-assed posting up in the first half, and when he did get position, they declined to throw him the basketball.

Gillispie had that right in his post-game comments:

"Our whole deal was to get the ball to the inside," Gillispie said. "We looked at the postgame stats and see that Jodie had 17 shots, DeAndre had 15 shots and Patrick only had 13 shots.

When Patterson went 8-for-13 then it is not that hard to figure out who should be getting the ball."

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Dec 7, 2008 10:46 AM EST up reply actions  

Totally agree

If we were running the offense, we would be getting the ball to the open perimeter shot or good positioning down low – which must involve Patterson getting touches and shots. Because we were just playing a game of catch on the perimeter, we had to settle for a contested three so many times.

by EEWildcat on Dec 7, 2008 11:36 AM EST up reply actions  

Right you are.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Dec 7, 2008 11:44 AM EST up reply actions  

It's more than running the offense....

…to get the ball to PPat. This team does not break down a defense. You need players (preferably point guards that can penetrate a defense and dish off. Kentucky does not have a player that has shown the ability or desire to take on that role. Maybe Jodie could do that, but he just seems to be interested in sitting on the perimeter and hoisting jump shots. I am convinced Porter is incapable. I think Liggins could do it, but he’s doesn’t seem all that interested in passing once he gets into sniffing range of the rim.

'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'

by HozeKing on Dec 7, 2008 1:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Did you ...

… watch the game at all last night?

Did you not see Liggins get in the lane for most of the second half? Meeks should have been doing that as well, but he just didn’t, and there is simply no excuse.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Dec 7, 2008 1:19 PM EST up reply actions  

I think it is a matter of perspective

True, Liggins penetrated more than anyone…although this is a relatively low standard to exceed. Again, he is by far the best option at this position, but it is relatively a weak option. I think UK should demand better recruits at this position…that’s all (and I know this is a longer term gripe and not pertinent for this year’s team).

'..when they bring a knife, you bring a gun...that's the Chicago way..'

by HozeKing on Dec 7, 2008 1:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Great rant, Tru,

couldn’t have said it better myself. This morning, I did something I rarely do—tried to reconcile the box score with what I saw on TV. Here it is:

Patterson: ‘Nother really good game. Despite some posters thinking he wasn’t working hard enough to get open, I saw him open lots in the high-mid post when he didn’t get the ball. When he did get it, he made things happen.
Meeks: Cold as ice, but reluctant to try to score any other way than from the perimeter. (Tru said it better). Exceptional work on D in the second half. Why not go to that in the first, Coach.
Miller: Got to shoot better. Very good work on the boards.
Liggins: Very nice game other than 3-pt shooting, particularly the one very late. If you ain’t hitting, get the rock to someone who is. Seven rebounds off your point guard is better than OK. And one of his turnovers, despite the speed of the pass, was Stevenson’s. This kid can play.
Stevenson: Got to be more aggressive with the ball and shoot better from the baseline. ABSOLUTELY great rebounds a couple of times reaching over others and tipping the ball to himself or a teammate. Tayshaun Prince isn’t bulky, either, so let’s quit giving Stevenson a pass because he’s relatively skinny. BE MORE AGGRESSIVE.
Harrelson: I vented some on this last night. Comes in, couple of baskets, defends against the high pick very well, becomes invisible man after he gets a shot blocked. Coach, WTFO?
Porter: No comment. Nice kid. Ain’t got it. Don’t blame him for starting. Last time I checked, the coach puts in the starting lineup.
Harris: Oh, yeah, couldn’t play. And neither could Lucas, Legion, or Rondo, so let’s get off it and stop what-iffing. You gotta dance with the one you brung, and we were waltzing to a pretty fast song in the first half.
Gillispie: Despite what I’ve said above, I am not ready to give up. He’s a stubborn dunderhead about things like Coury/Porter, but recruits pretty well. I wish he would adjust in-game a little better, and I sure as heck wish he could get his team motivated in the first half like they have been in the second. Jury is still out, but they’re asking questions of the judge.
Rupp: He wasn’t coaching, and the style has changed about 15 times since 1972. Hall, Sutton, Pitino, Smith weren’t coaching, either. And there’s no guarantee what would have happened if they had been. Gillispie was, and . . . Some basics remain, however: good outside shooting, picking both on and off the ball; quick ball movement, particularly in-and-out against an extended defense; positioning your body while the ball is in the air; good team defense to rely on when your shooting is off. Bottom line: Three things abide: shooting, passing, and defense, and the greatest of these is defense. (It’s Sunday, after all) At times, we had all except the shooting; too often we had none of them. We lost.

by oldcat'69 on Dec 7, 2008 10:51 AM EST reply actions  

Great comment.

I can’t improve on it, so I’ll just praise it. :-)

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Dec 7, 2008 10:55 AM EST up reply actions  

Recruits Pretty Well

He signed a Top 15 rated class in 2008 and Top 20 class in 2009.

UK needs more than Pretty Well Recruiting.

by FortyYearCatFan on Dec 7, 2008 10:56 AM EST up reply actions  

I don't think he's recruiting class is sub-par...

…If he would just play the “BEST” players before we get down 20+…

I do LOVE the heart on this team… They never give up and make strong comebacks, but it’s with their “best” players on the court that the come backs happen…
Any idiot could see this….

Why can’t coach see it..?

Steelers fan 1st! UK is my 2nd love.

by vinceuk1 on Dec 7, 2008 12:16 PM EST up reply actions  

UK Dominated In 1995-96-97-98-99

Because the Cats signed #1 class in 1992. Top 10 class in 1994. Top 5 class in 1995. Top 5 class in 1998.

Not because it did Pretty Well in Recruiting.

He’s a GOOD recruiter, NOT great.

by FortyYearCatFan on Dec 7, 2008 1:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Can't argue with that,

and I also can’t tell if you think top 15-20 is good or not. I personally would like to see Top Five AND better in-game coaching.

by oldcat'69 on Dec 7, 2008 11:31 AM EST reply actions  

It's Good BUT

Not good enough.

In my 40+ years of following UK, the Cats have signed Top 10 or better classes as follows:

1966. 1968. 1971. 1974. 1976. 1978. 1979. 1980. 1982. 1983. 1984. 1986. 1987. 1988. 1992. 1994. 1995. 1998. 1999. 2000. 2001. 2004.

But none in 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, or 2009.

by FortyYearCatFan on Dec 7, 2008 1:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Positive

I will say this. Gillispie hasn’t been sitting idle in practice. UK did very well handing the 3/4 quart pressure. We did a lot of passing and I can’t remember us turning the ball over or getting trapped. It wasn’t as much pressure as we have seen, but 4 games ago, we would have had a lot more turnovers. We looked very prepared in that respect.

Jodie Meeks did a great job guarding McClinton in the second half. Why we have to wait until the second half to see it, I don’t know.

Gillispie certainly made effective adjustments at halftime. Again, you’d like to see it sooner, but he did a great job adjusting, specially on defense.

The big problems still are half court defense (specifically, at the perimeter) for half of the game and our offensive half-court set is stagnant and inconsistent. Our fast break play could be a lot better too. We finish much less than we should.

Turnovers are improving, at least. Probably a lot of that was because we were too timid to try anything on offense, so maybe that’s not good.

by EEWildcat on Dec 7, 2008 11:43 AM EST reply actions  

Definitely ...

… we have seen a big improvement in ball handling over the last couple of games, and even though we had nine in the first half, many of them were errors in the post area or in transition. We had little difficulty getting into our offense, we just failed to offend.

Gillispie is doing a good job addressing the weaknesses of this team fundamentally. What we lacked in this most recent loss was more effort and execution. Plus, we continue to have the wrong people on the floor at the wrong times in the first half. Just inexplicable, really.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Dec 7, 2008 11:49 AM EST up reply actions  

Good point about the 3/4 court press,

and some of that may have been Liggins getting lots of minutes. I also saw him and Patterson allowing two or three defenders to start toward them before passing. I particularly like Patterson’s 1/2 second delay after he faces the basket to allow the defense to start to collapse before he drives/passes. Sometimes the pass can be too quick; all too often with this team, it just hasn’t been there.

by oldcat'69 on Dec 7, 2008 11:49 AM EST reply actions  

Fair enough.

I agree with you on all points. At this point I think everyone better get used to Gillispie being VERY comfortable going “against the grain” with his coaching decisions and sticking to his guns even in the face of screaming evidence to the contrary. I think this will prove to provide some enduring frustration in the coach-fanbase relationship. Hell, I find it frustrating and I’m not even a ’Cat fan! Gillispie deserves the criticism.

Orange and Blue Hue: The World through GATOR-colored Glasses -- http://www.orangeandbluehue.com

by Gatorpilot on Dec 7, 2008 7:08 PM EST reply actions  

Congrats ...

BTW, on another shot at a BCS championship.

Yeah, I am not pulling punches when it comes to stuff that is just crazy to me. I don’t know all the stuff he does, but I have to go with the evidence of my eyes. I’ll go on a little faith, but my faith is not unlimited.

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Dec 7, 2008 7:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks.

We will try to make the SEC proud.

Orange and Blue Hue: The World through GATOR-colored Glasses -- http://www.orangeandbluehue.com

by Gatorpilot on Dec 8, 2008 1:05 AM EST up reply actions  

Side Story

I have had a part time job at Rupp Arena in Concessions just to make a little extra money and started it last year just after basketball season ended. It is some sort of policy there that you have to work all UK home games. Well, I lucked into tickets for the last two and called in, but I didnt get tickets for this game and wondered how it was going to work “working” during a UK game. IT SUCKED! At first it was ok. I chose a register where I was able to see the television and when I took my break I was able to go out into the arena and watch live for a bit, but toward the end of the game was when I had my fill. There was like five minutes or so to go and we were within winning distance and I am glued to the tv only to have the stand supervisor say, “I need you to go ahead and start wiping things down.” SERIOUSLY??? I went ahead and did my job, but at the end of the night I found the head supervisor and said, “I’m sorry, this just isnt going to work out for me,” and turned in my visor. I love the game too much to be dealing with that crap. If I cant be at the game, I HAVE to be in front of the game – with my UNDIVIDED attention on it!

by kentuckygirl0724 on Dec 7, 2008 11:14 PM EST reply actions  

Heh.

I can appreciate that. It’s hard trying to do two things well at once, which is one of the reasons I stopped live-blogging basketball. It’s just too distracting, and even though I run a UK blog, trying to type at the same time I am watching a game and manage people’s comments is just plain impossible, and really detracts from my enjoyment.

And if I can’t enjoy the game, then I ain’t happy. :-)

A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan

by Glenn Logan on Dec 8, 2008 7:37 AM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

An exciting community-driven SBNation blog, by and for fans of the Kentucky Wildcats.

Community Guidelines
[UPDATED 01/18/2012]

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Eko_world_small
Coach Cal and His Love for Hair Flare
323_small
N.Y. Times/Pete Thamel / FLW Tour- Nerlens Noel Open
323_small
In Cal We Trust?
Small
Show 'Em The Money
323_small
Richie Farmer: Unforgettable Or Not?
Eko_world_small
Huge Problem for UK FANS
Img_0019_small
Not of general interest.
323_small
The King Is Dead, Long Live The King!
Grover_avatar_small
Reds Fans Upset UK to be Honored at Tonight's Game
Small
Recruiting In 1960's > Limit Was 25 Scholarships

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Twitter Widget -- Follow me!


Managing Editor

Tru_small Glenn Logan

Editor

Derby_024_small BigSkyCat

Fl_family_photo_small Ken Howlett

Author

Small JLeverenz

Justified-olyphant_small jc25

P1000195_small a2d2

Img_0019_small Alex Scutchfield