Kentucky basketball: An early season look at some key stats
This season is very young so far, but after only three games, I thought we would examine a few key statistics from a player perspective. Obviously, losing the first two games is an ugly stat from a team perspective, and much has been made of our turnover problems. What I want to do here is look a little deeper at some key statistics, and see how the individual play with regard to those stats is affecting overall team performance.
Scoring
| Player | Minutes | Points | Points/Min | Points/40 min | Pts/pos |
| Jodie Meeks | 110 | 80 | 0.73 | 29.09 | 0.35 |
| Patrick Patterson | 101 | 36 | 0.36 | 14.26 | 0.16 |
| Ramon Harris | 86 | 35 | 0.41 | 16.28 | 0.15 |
| Perry Stevenson | 77 | 27 | 0.35 | 14.03 | 0.12 |
| Darius Miller | 67 | 25 | 0.37 | 14.93 | 0.11 |
| DeAndre Liggins | 61 | 11 | 0.18 | 7.21 | 0.05 |
| Michael Porter | 56 | 12 | 0.21 | 8.57 | 0.05 |
| Josh Harrellson | 30 | 6 | 0.2 | 8 | 0.03 |
| A.J. Stewart | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kevin Galloway | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mark Krebs | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Landon Slone | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Possessions | 231 |
The problems I see with this group of stats are probably the same ones most 'Cat fans see. Jodie Meeks has entirely too much of the scoring load, more than double the number of points/possession as Patrick Patterson. That can't continue. It suggests that too many shots are being taken from the perimeter, and against better defensive teams, that is going to make us uncompetitive.
Notice how efficient Ramon Harris is. He actually has more points per minute played than either Stevenson or Patterson. That's because he rarely takes anything remotely resembling a bad shot, and Harris has scored almost as many points as Patrick Patterson. Anyone who thought Patterson was his old self need only look at this statistic to be utterly dissuaded. Ramon Harris is primarily a defensive stopper, and if he is averaging more points/minute than your stud forward, your team has issues.
Darius Miller has been more efficient per minute played than than Patterson or Stevenson. Overall, we see some nice balance shaping up scoring-wise, but the disparity between Meeks and the rest of the team is just too great. Clearly, Meeks is getting too many shots compared to Patterson and Stevenson in particular. Unbalanced scoring like this will make it much easier for teams to defend Kentucky. and make UK subject to cold shooting by Meeks.
Assists/Turnovers
| Name | Assists | A/Min | A/40 | A/Pos | TO | TO/Min | TO/40 | TO/Pos | A/T 40 |
| DeAndre Liggins | 14 | 0.23 | 9.18 | 0.06 | 12 | 0.2 | 7.87 | 0.05 | 1.17 |
| Patrick Patterson | 9 | 0.09 | 3.56 | 0.04 | 5 | 0.05 | 1.98 | 0.02 | 1.8 |
| Michael Porter | 8 | 0.14 | 5.71 | 0.03 | 9 | 0.16 | 6.43 | 0.04 | 0.89 |
| Darius Miller | 6 | 0.09 | 3.58 | 0.03 | 7 | 0.1 | 4.18 | 0.03 | 0.86 |
| Jodie Meeks | 4 | 0.04 | 1.45 | 0.02 | 14 | 0.13 | 5.09 | 0.06 | 0.29 |
| Ramon Harris | 3 | 0.03 | 1.4 | 0.01 | 10 | 0.12 | 4.65 | 0.04 | 0.3 |
| Perry Stevenson | 3 | 0.04 | 1.56 | 0.01 | 5 | 0.06 | 2.6 | 0.02 | 0.6 |
| Josh Harrellson | 1 | 0.03 | 1.33 | 0 | 1 | 0.03 | 1.33 | 0 | 1 |
| Possessions | 231 |
Again, the problems in these statistics are pretty obvious. First off, our point guard position has a combined A/TO ratio of 1.04-1. A 2-1 A/TO is considered good in college basketball, so I think we can safely say that 1.04-1 is bad -- essentially one turnover per assist.
DeAndre Liggins is both an assist and turnover machine. He leads the team far and away in both statistics, and although he is a freshman, the 'Cats desperately need him to mature quickly. What is interesting is that Patrick Patterson has the best A/TO ratio per 40 minutes played on the entire team. Maybe we should let him initiate the offense (kidding!). Michael Porter, as we see, pales in comparison to Jodie Meeks in assist/turnover. That is mainly because Meeks is pretty much a one-way pass these days.
We need to see better passing into the post, which will greatly improve both statistics. In addition, Kentucky needs to be much more patient bringing the ball up the floor on both inbounds after baskets and on the break. Kentucky has yet to run a really good fast break all season, with most of them being run incorrectly by players entering the break from the middle of the court, rather than from the wing. This is Basketball 101 type stuff that even the freshmen shouldn't have to learn.
Conclusion
These two groups of stats are illustrative of most of Kentucky's offensive problems right now -- unbalanced scoring and lousy ball-handling. Solving them will be a gradual process, but the learning curve for these stats isn't all that steep. What it really comes down to is fundamental execution of the little things, like dribbling with a purpose, crisp two-handed passes and solid positioning. This team has plenty of skill to win against most anyone, but the execution so far has been sadly lacking.
Kentucky really needs to get more inside-out balance in their scoring, and do a much better job of entering the ball into the post. Patrick Patterson's high A/T ratio demonstrates the good things that can happen when he gets the ball in the post area. Part of the fault for this has been Pat's -- he really hasn't posted up nearly as strong as he did last year, nor is he as relentless at getting good position.
Jodie Meeks has got to do a better job of trying to help make that post entry, or draw defenders to him and kick the ball back to the wing for a reversal that should lead to a clean entry pass. Jodie is obviously willing to pick up the scoring load, and we do need some of that, but at this point, we have to find a way to get our interior players more involved. Kentucky has its best front line in some time, but right now it is under-performing mostly due to a lack of focus on getting the ball where our front-court players can do the most damage.
Passers from the wing have got to stop hesitating with the post entry and make it immediately when it opens up. How many times have we seen Patterson get position and the ball handler looking to move the ball somewhere other than down into the post? We don't need to telegraph the pass, but the wing players really need to make the entry pass as soon as Patterson establishes position.
Again, all these things should improve as the season progresses, but what we are seeing now is, as I have mentioned before, a lack of the offense being able to see the ball at all times and keep the big picture in mind. The most important thing we can do on offense right now is get some clean feeds into the post, and develop that skill as fully as possible. Good things will happen if we do.
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The stat that amazes me...
…Is the points that Harris would be getting at 40mins… He has to be the most unassuming scorer on the team… I mean, you watch the entire game and after it’s over you go, “Harris had 16 points..? Hummm, nice”
Instead of the Alaskan assassin, he should be called the silent assassin… lol
Steelers fan 1st! UK is my 2nd love.
Harris is Attacking
the basket this year almost every time he has an opportunity. Last year, he rarely did. He seems to be hustling and playing with a lot more intensity than last year. He’s also quick to the basket — with authority. It’s nice to see.
Harris is the most effective player on the team right now
With his lock-down defense and very nice points/minute (and like Tru says, no bad shots) the Razor is getting it done on both sides of the court!
Very good interesting analysis.
What about assist to turnover ratio?
I really think you need to look at assist to turnover ratio to get a better idea about performance. This team has been committing far too many turnovers. What impressed me so much about Darius Miller’s play in the last game was the combination of assists as well as ability to score and I didn’t see many turnovers.
I believe ...
… I discussed that. That statistic is also available above (A/T 40= Assist/Turnover ratio per 40 minutes).
I, too, was impressed by Miller’s play. He was extremely efficient last game in every way, and it was certainly a performance that our older players would do well to emulate.
But turnovers in isolation only tell part of the story. They are important, but they can be overcome with things like offensive rebounds. What we need to see less of is unforced turnovers, and last game we had much fewer of them. Forced turnovers are caused by good defense, whereas unforced turnovers are caused by either by a lack of confidence with the ball, carelessness, or trying to force a pass or dribble. Careless turnovers can be minimized simply by not hurrying.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
A little confusing
Seems like the 40 minutes would cancel out in A/T per 40 minutes. But I’m no statistician.
I think it means
the A/T ratio for every 40 minutes of play. So if a player had only played 20 minutes they would actually multiply by 2 to get the rate for 40 minutes and so on.
It's true ...
… that the ratio should really be the same either way. You could calculate the A/T ratio by using all assists over all turnovers just as easily.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
Assist rates for Porter, Liggins
It’s only three games, so you have to keep in mind we’re talking about small sample sizes:
Assist Rates
Liggins: 34.9
Porter: 21.7
Ramel Bradley (2007-08): 21.3
Ken Pomeroy hasn’t set up stats for this season yet (at least as far as I can tell), but Liggins’ rate would have been good for 28th in the country last year (Bradley was 366th). What this suggests to me is that when UK hasn’t turned the ball over, Liggins and Porter have been able to get the ball to guys in places to take good shots. That bodes well for when Liggins really gets comfortable in the offense and they cut down on the turnovers and get more FG attempts.
"That's not a Sherman tank, it's Frank Thomas!" - Monkeyball

by 













