Randall Cobb to start against Mississippi State
Rich Brooks finally bowed to the inevitable, as most of us thought he would. Brooks announced today that Mike Hartline would be replaced at starting quarterback by Randall Cobb in a move that surprised no one who saw the fiasco at Florida.
When asked to justify his decision (as if that is really necessary), Brooks gave a typical, Rich Brooks answer consisting of exactly one word, "Production." No explanation needed, right Rich? Dang skippy. Brooks says Hartline will play, but the conventional wisdom is that the snaps will essentially be flip-flopped from recent weeks with Cobb getting the lion's share.
Hartline is said to be disappointed, but quite frankly, I am clueless as to why he would be. I am not bashing Mike, far from it, but here at A Sea of Blue, we do try to hue close to reality. The reality is, Hartline is not able to move the football with any semblance of consistency. He is not awful, the offense just isn't productive with him at the helm. Where the blame lies for that is irrelevant -- the reason for the change is, to use a Latin phrase, ad oculous -- it is obvious to anyone who saw the game Saturday who was more productive at the position.
I'm sure this is a move that Rich Brooks makes reluctantly. I know he wanted to stick with Hartline, and the biggest reason is simply his offensive philosophy, which is a pro-style offense. Randall Cobb is most assuredly not a pro-style player, and although Brooks & Co. know how to use a dual-threat quarterback, it goes a bit against their grain and offensive philosophy to do so. Brooks prefers his football like I prefer my whiskey -- straight up with no BS to mess with the flavor.
With Cobb, you need to run essentially a spread option (with modifications) to get the most out of him, and Brooks is not a fan of that offense. It is, however, exactly what you see most often with Cobb under center. When you see Cobb putting the ball in the running back's hands and then pulling it back, that is a simple read option where the QB is looking at either the backside DE or linebacker. Cobb can hand it off or pull it back depending on what his key does. Hartline never runs that play, and Cobb runs it all the time in several variations. Brooks does not love this offense, but he knows that with an athlete like Cobb, it can be deadly.
This style will also force the defense to play honest and not stack the box like they have done against UK all year. If we run it often enough, somebody is gong to break a long run or get isolated on a linebacker underneath for big yardage. We'll just have to see how innovative Phillips and Brooks decide to be now that they have committed to Cobb for the nonce.
So there we go. One big decision made, and Brooks has intimated that there will be others. Discuss.
Read Related
Comments
Finally.
Randall Cobb gives this team the best chance to win. Repeat ad infinitum. That’s all on that.
This has been a deeply maddening season since the problems (offense, special teams) which availed themselves in the preseason have not improved over the course of the season. The same deficits Ken alluded to in his preseason analyses, have continued without betterment if not intensification from game 1 to current. This is in part due to coaching, and I’m not sure Brooks would disagree. With three winnable games remaining on the schedule against Mississippi State, Tennessee and the increasingly shaky Vanderbilt, the Cats still have a chance to right the wrongs and turn late October frustrations into late December delights.
It begins, but by no means ends, with Randall Cobb.
Two months (!). Two weeks. Two pencils.
by Thomas Hunt Morgan on Oct 27, 2008 8:11 PM EDT 0 recs
I just wonder who Cobb throws the ball to?
I don’t see Brooks and co. chaning our entire offense to suit Cobb’s skillset, so who will be our playmaker now? We run a pro-style offense, so unless we really work on the option and bootleg a lot this week we’re still going to be in a lot of trouble.
It’s easy to place the blame on a QB, but our O-line, running backs and receivers have been equally as terrible. Luckily, we only need one more win to qualify for our 3rd straight bowl, and this is a transition year. Good things are still on the horizon football Cats fans.
Still not a crook!
by TrickyD26 on Oct 27, 2008 9:50 PM EDT 0 recs
Tol' ya so? NOT
I bet Joker/Brooks can get a few plays with permutations that will look like a full playbook to take advantage of Cobbs skills. If (when?) Cobb has success I hope the fans don’t react by whining about not making the change sooner. J/B has seemed to work in mysterious ways but only in short term success not in long term goals. They’ve got a delicate balance of success for this year and QB rotation in the next couple of years to consider as well as not getting Cobb dedicated to that rotation when his talent might be better utilized at other positions. How great to have a problem of a player so talented, dedicated, intelligent and team oriented. Can he be cloned?
by hoboat33 on
Oct 27, 2008 10:23 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Oline?
Our o-line has given up the least amount of sacks in the SEC. Might want to re think that.
by BleedinUKBlue on
Oct 27, 2008 10:49 PM EDT
up
0 recs
That So?
Do you think that number will go up a little with Cobb? I’ll give Hartline credit for knowing how to not take a sack – sometimes too quickly, though.
by hoboat33 on
Oct 27, 2008 10:55 PM EDT
up
0 recs
but...
our run-blocking stinks. O-line has to be at least partially responsible.
by goinss1 on
Oct 27, 2008 11:13 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Yes, I was referring to run-blocking.
Still not a crook!
by TrickyD26 on
Oct 28, 2008 11:36 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Well
having caught a few (VERY FEW) in high school from out of the backfield (prior to fully discovering the three G’s – Girls, Guitars and Ganja and successfully reaching a 1.2 gpa thus ending my sports career)
One QB went on to Vandy and the other…well, I have no idea and can’t remember his name…
When the better QB threw it was just different. Both could be on the numbers and the same speed and yet one’s pass would get away from you and the other stuck like glue. I think it was two fold – he was just better and second, he made us all feel like we were better at the same time.
Let us hope this magical idea hits our corp of kids and they just start catching the ball. Because Hartline has been on the helpless end of many extremely easy balls to pull in all year.
Changing how you think will change what you think.
by wilson452 on
Oct 28, 2008 1:53 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Brooks' Obstinacy
It was once known as “being set in his ways” and was attributed as a weakness of those who, usually in their later years, became so inured to change that despite proof to the contrary refused to alter their life habits. As a man of more years than Rich Brooks I feel safe in commenting that the coach’s refusal to recognize the obvious has been deleterious to the program he leads. That characteristic served him well in the years of struggle and challenge in taking UK from probation and its many injurious ramifications to a level of respectability. Stick-to-it-iveness was needed to overcome negativity, to focus unswervingly on the goal, to resist temptations to cut corners, to keep on keeping on. Alas, a plateau — even the goal, if you will — was reached and, as usually happens, changes and innovation were required to continue the advance and Brooks found himself unable to make the adjustments in his way of doing things. And why should he, after all his methods had been reasonably successful and earned him honors and acclaim. Evidence of Brooks’ aversion to change are present in the past but more recently are exemplified by a few instances: the naming of Phillips as his successor, thus ensuring as much as possible continuation of the status quo; naming Dixon starting running back and keeping him at the position despite glaringly obvious evidence that others were more talented; continuing Harline at QB to the point of near team collapse; retaining Ortmayer as special teams coach in the face of many repetitive yet correctable errors. Some might view these as the honor of a fierce loyalty but at some point in time such an attribute becomes counterproductive to progress. It seems to me that time has arrived. Perhaps Henry Ward Beecher put it most aptly:
"The difference between perseverance and obstinacy is that one often comes from a strong will, and the other from a strong won’t."
by Wild Weasel on Oct 28, 2008 2:29 PM EDT 0 recs
THIS....
…is the type of comments that makes this site the best.
Post this on other sites and you could almost hear the deafening roar of silence from zero thought waves.
Thank you.
Changing how you think will change what you think.
by wilson452 on
Oct 28, 2008 3:13 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Excellent Comment...
When I read comments like this and others on this site, it makes me proud to be a member of an outstanding and intellectual community of the Big Blue Nation.
by kykat51 on
Oct 28, 2008 6:05 PM EDT
up
0 recs











