Kentucky @ Florida: Learning painful lessons in the aftermath of a calamity
It is my experience that most lessons are best learned by pain and embarrassment. Nobody wants to learn that way, but it seems to me that the painful lessons are more quickly ingrained into habit, and stand the test of time.
After being shredded by Florida, rolled into a fatty and smoked like an illegal substance, Brooks & Co. have precious little time to identify the problems that lead to this calumny and address them. I assure you, after they lick their wounds and read the papers, Brooks' charges are going to be more than willing to do anything not to have to suffer such a brutal beating again. Identifying the main issues are not very hard, although locating the deeper causes is a job for the coaching staff, not a layman blogger like me.
With that said, let's look at the main issues that most every fan could at least identify:
- Defensive balance -- During the SEC portion of the season and against MSU, UK has shown serious difficulty in dealing with quick backs receiving passes out of the backfield. As good as our linebackers are right now, they are currently no match for the speedy SEC running backs.
- The kicking game -- We have had five (5) kicks blocked this year. I can't recall a season where we ever had that many. Clearly, our kick protection needs immediate attention.
- Offensive production -- Our offensive production is simply not at a sustainable level if we ever hope to win. Our defense is simply not good enough against SEC quality competition.
These are the three main factors that UK has struggled with in the SEC portion of its schedule. Let's address them one by one:
Defensive balance -- When an opponent has a particularly athletic set of backs, we are going to have to adjust on defense in our pre-game plan. With all due respect to Rich Brooks, sticking with Micah Johnson and Braxton Kelley, hobbled as they were, was a strategic mistake. We needed to keep our nickel package in there most of the game to give someone a chance to stay with Demps and Harvin. I know that we don't have any athletes that really match up with them, but Kelley and a hobbled Johnson just couldn't. A couple of times, it was just a joke -- our linebackers looked like they were shod in lead.
But in reality, we have to address this through recruiting by getting faster, more athletic defenders. Even if we start right now, that won't show up for years to come. Of course, we could have also tried what worked for Ole Miss, which is basically an all-out blitz every play. But we weren't willing to risk the easy touchdown, I guess -- even though I have to say the defense we played did not prevent easy touchdowns.
The kicking game -- Blocked kicks have led directly to 30 points for our opponents, that works out to 6 points/block. Folks, it's hard to spot SEC teams that many points and expect to have a chance. Letting punts hit our receivers, poor coverage on kickoffs, poor coverage on punts -- the kicking game has produced an indictment against UK that falls at the feet of Steve Ortmayer. I would hope that he now takes whatever action he feels necessary to fix this glaring problem. If not, perhaps he should consider another coaching position. I am not calling for his head here, I am calling for him to recognize the problem and find a way to fix it -- it is his job to make sure these young men execute on special teams. There can be no more excuses on this point.
The main thing is, we have to make sure that every man on and near the line is accounted for, and that everyone knows who to block. One block was a clear failure of a player to know who his assignment was. Another was a player who simply didn't exert the proper effort and got run completely over for his laziness. I expect that player will get to watch that particular play 10,000 times as motivation. Bottom line -- special teams are not communicating well. Kentucky played pretty well in the kicking game early in the year, and now we are completely failing in that area.
Offensive production -- Well, you all know what this means. I am tired of hearing Brooks tell me that Mike Hartline is the best man for the job of quarterback. He clearly isn't and this analysis by Eric Crawford illustrates that fact in spades. I'm sorry if Mike Hartline is a great kid, or might lose his confidence, or whatever other excuse Brooks can think of. Even Will Fidler looked more competent than Hartline, I'm sorry to say, although it was against Florida's second string.
The fact is, Cobb simply can't play wide receiver this year. He never came close to getting loose against Florida at receiver, and evey SEC team will simply put their lockdown corner on him every game, reducing the chances for him to make an impact. Brooks should know this, and I am tired of the argument that it's better to have them both on the field. Getting him the ball on well-defended tunnel screens and short passes is simply not working at all, and Brooks must acknowledge that reality or risk losing this football team. The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result, and Brooks is getting perilously close to that definition.
Hartline needs to become a backup to Cobb for the rest of the season, or at the very least a couple of games. I don't care if Cobb doesn't know half the plays, he knows enough to move the football pretty well against a Florida defense that is darn good. If he turns the ball over, he does, but it's time to chuck him into the deep water and see if he can swim. I know Brooks has his reasons, but they are no longer valid in my view, whatever they are. This game made that point inescapably. If this is Brooks' worst nightmare, it's time to embrace the horror.
So there we have it -- my prescription for an improved Wildcat team:
- A defensive strategy that is actually based on the personnel we are facing as much as the personnel we have available;
- An immediate focus on the kicking game, particularly protection schemes. Even if they work on nothing else for the next three days, simply fixing the kicking game will net us at least six points for each block we manage to avoid. Even if we miss a FG, that's a net three points just for avoiding the block.
- Randall Cobb at quarterback. Sorry, Hartline, better luck next year. You've got time to get better, but we need help now in the playmaking department, and you are just too one-dimensional.
Feel free to add to this list your observations.
0 recs |
13 comments
|
Comments
hartline
I’m glad someone finally says it out loud. I don’t want to hear any of that “Well he’s got grit and hustle and all that”. People said the same about mark coury but lets face it, the team played better on the court, just like Uk plays better without hartline on the field. He can’t throw it down field, he panics, he just can’t play in the SEC. Cobb actaullky throws it down the field, so the d will have to int turn respect that, which opens up runs and screens. It ludicracy to see brooks sticking with hartline. I’m 100% with you on this one tru.
by BleedinUKBlue on Oct 26, 2008 6:45 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't think ...
… I would go quite that far.
I think Hartline can play in the SEC — I think. But he’s not ready this year, that I do know.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Oct 26, 2008 7:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yesterday
I don’t follow football all that closely (living for basketball season), but I couldn’t even watch yesterday. So, I’ll defer to you guys as I really don’t know enough to opine. Just please, Coach Brooks and team, try not to embarrass yourselves next week. I live in Alabama and Monday morning isn’t going to be much fun at my work…. It looks to me like with the sports tradition that UK has, we could find a quarterback somewhere who is ready to play.
by bluegrassgal on Oct 26, 2008 7:16 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yessir, it's time
I don’t get to see many of the UK games on TV (Louisville, Alabama, Florida) but keep up through blogs, etc. and have been anxious to see Hartline vs Cobb in action. The Lousiville game I give a tossup and agreed with Joker/Brooks that he managed the game well – first game of season, big rivalry, first game starting sophomore. The next game I saw (Alabama) Hartline again “managed the game”, marginal improvement but nothing any average quarterback shouldn’t show over 4-5 games. Somewhat dissappointed in lack of improvement but attributed that to Bama defense. (Cobb was out injured but still had the presence of mind to step in for one play when somebody was out in lala land. – Coaches! What’s with that?) I read about several games where Cobb provided spark to the offense and several people calling for Cobb to start in place of Hartline. At the time, I gave Joker/Brooks the benefit of the doubt – Hartline should start.
Then I got to see the Florida game(?). Tru – the definition of insanity phrase was rolling through my mind the entire game after seeing Cobb in action. When he is in there at least there IS action. I can’t understand the obsession with Hartline unless he’s got pictures of Brooks with a donkey. I don’t want to rehash what you and others have so eloquently but please cast my vote to start Cobb at QB now. Let the fans have something a little more exciting to watch to finish out the year and then next year don’t hesitate to move Mossakowski or Newton in as starter – yes, as a freshmen, it can work. Look around the nation, the right freshman can do it, even Cobb.
by hoboat33 on Oct 26, 2008 8:30 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
No next year for Hartline.
UK has two great QB prospects coming next season: 5-star Morgan Newton will be hard to keep off the field as a pure freshman. Cobb will go back to WR, with the possibilty of being a backup or “change of pace” QB. (Although I think Newton is an athletic option-capable QB, right?) Hartline will be at best 3rd on the depth chart, possibly 4th.
by TheFakeGimelMartinez on Oct 26, 2008 8:41 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I really thought Hartline
was the man for the job. I too don’t get to see many UK games but after watching the first half of the FL debacle I have to cast my vote with Cobb supporters. Hartline has had plenty of games to get his groove with the offense and has experienced enough defenses to check the right plays. On the same hand Cobb has seen enough game action and practice time to execute on the field. His decision making abilities at QB are ahead of Hartline’s and it was on obvious display Saturday.
My biggest concern offensively even with Cobb in the game is the amount of time it takes to get a play off. It seems like everytime the play clock hits seven seconds the QB steps forward to change the play and either gets the ball of just in time or has to call a timeout. I can’t believe there is that much latitude given to them by Joker who is calling in the plays. I never played organized ball so I may be wrong. It’s just nervewracking to watch the clock appear on the screen and watch your QB running around the line yelling and motioning to everybody. Just get the damn ball off already!!!
Astute analysis as always Tru.
GO BIG BLUE!!!
by bluecrip on Oct 27, 2008 4:05 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I, too ...
… have supported Hartline up until now, but it seems to me like there comes a point in every season where coaches are forced to make a decision like this at some position. It is actually pretty often a QB decision. Brooks has been maybe a little spoiled having Woodson, but Hartline is no Woodson. I know Woodson and Pulley were nip and tuck there for a while, but the disparity, as I recall, was never this wide when it came to who could move the team and who could not.
I’m not giving up on Hartline, although many will. Many will see the two young guys coming in next year as running Hartline off, but I’m not at all sure that will happen. Hartline has certainly shown a willingness to compete for the job, and after another year of maturation, he may be the best option. We just don’t know.
Right now, however, he just isn’t able to move the football team. It’s probably only about 50% his fault, but fault no longer matters. If we are to save our goals for this season, we need to make a change there, at least for most of the snaps.
It is no sure thing Brooks will do it. He is a very stubborn man, and will usually stick by his guns. But I don’t know how he can deny the evidence of his eyes any longer and not risk losing the team along with the fans. It’s that obvious to us armchair coaches, and no matter what, he does have to keep this team from having to deal with more distractions.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Oct 27, 2008 6:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Same
I have been a Hartline supporter along the lines of the “Cobb can’t throw to himself” variety, but after watching the ball move with Randall on the field… I just can’t deny it anymore. The team genuinely seems to play better as a whole when he’s out there. Just one of those inexplicable things I guess.
The late snaps is something that has always bothered me over the last couple of years. Woodson took a helluva long time to get the play called and the ball snapped.
RE: Next year’s QB’s. Based purely on reputation, I would like to see Mossakowski take a redshirt year. If Newton is as good as advertised and is the second coming of Tim Couch and is good enough to go pro early, that could leave us two years with Mossakowski as a seasoned QB three years down the road. (Gotta think long term, right?)
Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."
by chirop1 on Oct 27, 2008 7:54 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Get more creative...
Did any of you guys watch Michigan St vs Michigan later Saturday afternoon? Michigan St passed horizontally to their receiver who passed right back to their QB then went down field to a wide open receiver who ran for a touchdown . That could work with Hartline/Cobb. The Cats seem like they are trying to keep things simple to minimize mistakes with their young guys, but they need to get more creative in their play calling to move the football.
by cthom on Oct 27, 2008 9:04 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Uh. . . no.
We have trouble completing one pass, what makes you think we could successfully pull off two on the same play? :)
C! A! T! S! CATS! CATS! CATS!
by NYCCats on Oct 27, 2008 9:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Heh.
Hard to argue.
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Oct 27, 2008 11:05 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Might work
IF Cobb could pass to himself…..
by kentuckygirl0724 on Oct 27, 2008 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think ...
… we can all agreed that he isn’t quite that good. :-)
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on Oct 27, 2008 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 













