Not what we hoped for ...
Well, there we go. We gave it a game effort in the first half, but in the second half, Louisville's superior depth and talent simply did us in. Congratulations to the Cardinals, they played hard, made good adjustments at the half, and rode our cold shooting to big victory. This was not a case of Kentucky giving the game away, it was a case of Louisville earning the victory with perseverance and superior depth and talent.
First of all, I want to dispose of the ... fracas in the second half. I thought the referees got that one exactly right. Bradley clearly committed an intentional foul, and owned up to it right away. Terrance Williams clearly earned a technical with a shove on Crawford. I don't hold anything against Williams -- if the situation had been reversed, I am reasonably sure Bradley would have been T'd up. Bradley said some very ungentlemanly things to Williams during the encounter, so I am satisfied with the outcome and I hope most Kentucky fans are as well. Williams was standing up for his teammate, and even though he took it too far, it was not without provocation. In the end, it was the right call, and diffused a potentially explosive situation.
As to the outcome of the game, well, that's different. In the first half, I think Kentucky showed great defensive pressure and played hard. This entire game, the Wildcats were bedeviled with poor perimeter shooting, something we could ill afford. Jodie Meeks played a poor game, taking bad shots and making very few. Patrick Patterson was not himself, and the Cardinals deserve all the credit for getting him off his game. Caracter and Padget just refused to let him get a clean look, and Patterson attempted some very strange and uncharacteristic offensive moves. The big guy gets a pass on this one -- he is a freshman, and for the first time all year, played like one.
Joe Crawford delivered his usual mixed bag. He scored, he made free throws on good drives to the basket, and he spent the basketball like a sailor seeing his first liberty in six months. God knows whether he did more harm than good, but from my viewpoint, he did marginally more good than harm. But in the end, it wasn't enough.
Louisville simply had too much depth and talent for us to beat them. Not only that, they are not a young team -- they are filled with juniors and seniors, and that leadership really worked in their favor and against the Wildcats in this one. Pitino stuck with the zone almost the entire game, which is really a surprise to me. If we had been able to shoot the ball like we did against FIU, the outcome could have very well gone the other way. But alas, we didn't.
So we suffer our first loss at the hands of the Cardinals in four years. I suppose that is just the facts of life, and just another log on the fire of a difficult and painful season. Can we turn it around? I don't know. But in the final analysis, we are going to have to play much better to have any chance of being competitive in the SEC. I am searching for a silver lining here, but I confess, I can't find one. Feel free to help me out.
0 recs |
13
comments
Comments
Joe Crawford....
by khlim2 on Jan 5, 2008 8:26 PM EST 0 recs
Plenty of silver linings
- UK has a small lineup that can be effective. With them healthy, gaining experience, they will be able to beat good SEC teams.
- Heart. UK played very hard the entire game. All of them. This was the best 40 minute "effort" this year.
- Jasper. He is getting better and when he is 100% UK is going to be much better.
- The future. Patterson, Meeks and Jasper. I do believe they will be very good next year and UK should start to dominate the SEC again. It will happen.
- Coaching. UK was very well prepared, handled the press very well and the small lineup worked great. UK ran out of gas and UL was just superior.
by BeatUL on Jan 5, 2008 9:41 PM EST 0 recs
Good points ...
I am not disappointed in our effort at all. I agree with you that we played with heart.
We just executed poorly in the second half on both sides of the ball. No doubt, fatigue was a factor. Jasper and Meeks are clearly not in shape to deliver the kind of minutes we will need.
And the press did not bother us, that is also true. I am not quite so sold on the small lineup, but it did have its moments.
Nice comment.
by Truzenzuzex on
Jan 5, 2008 11:32 PM EST
up
0 recs
Not only a bad game...
by cardsfan84 on Jan 5, 2008 9:58 PM EST 0 recs
Feh ...
Just remember back to the Patrick Sparks 3-pointer. That still rankles Card fans.
by Truzenzuzex on
Jan 5, 2008 11:35 PM EST
up
0 recs
The overriding theme
I did not get to watch the game and was forced to try to keep up with the action on the computer at work. This being said, I'm wondering about the DNPs for some and little to no minutes for others. Any info, opinions would be appreciated.
by wldcatsfreak on Jan 5, 2008 10:29 PM EST 0 recs
Thank goodness for positive responses
by scwhite9 on Jan 6, 2008 12:15 AM EST 0 recs
Reality
The team does play extremly hard,and you can't fault them for effort,but they just don't have it.They remind me of a runner trying to win a race on a treadmill.The effort is there,they can't win because they are on a treadmill.And a lot of times this team id playing 3 on 5 because of an inability for some to score.
And reality is ,this is a team that is short on real D-1 talent,and stated several times by the announcers today on CBS,and others for the past 2 years.
by UKats on Jan 6, 2008 12:16 AM EST 0 recs
What I expected...
by hoopchi on Jan 6, 2008 12:35 AM EST 0 recs
This team will get better
Not sure why. Just a gut feeling.
When Meeks, Jasper and Patterson learn how to play with each other, this team will be pretty good.
by Gatorpilot on Jan 6, 2008 12:38 AM EST 0 recs
Re: GP
I think you are right. As I posted below, UK fans must embrace the limitations of this team.
Help is on they way.
by Ken Howlett on
Jan 6, 2008 12:45 AM EST
up
0 recs
UK v UL
When both Meeks and Patterson have bad games, UK has a zero chance of beating a good team. The talent level is just not where it should be, and today we saw that fact illustrated in front of God and everybody.
I felt bad for Patterson. He simply forced too much--two threes?--and was physically manhandled. We all knew it had to happen at some point, it was just a matter of when. As Tru stated, he played like a rookie.
Helping Louisville along was UK's 20 turnovers in the final 30 minutes of play. Kentucky couldn't hit the open three, it goes on and on.
It doesn't matter though. Today, a far superior opponent invaded Rupp, and we saw what the future holds. UK would have had to play a near perfect game in order to win.
The talent discrepency was so evident today. Even more so than against UNC or IU. UL has a gifted, and experienced team. UK has a less gifted, by a long shot, and less experienced team. So much so that if UL plays to 70-75% of its capabilities, they would beat UK 9 out of 10 games.
One must realize though, that this will not always be the case. This year though, accepting that fact, embracing that fact, will make this year go down much more smoothly.
I am not condoning giving up on this team. Just accept its limitations, which are going to be very difficult to overcome this year.
by Ken Howlett on Jan 6, 2008 12:41 AM EST 0 recs
have patience
Don't misunderstand. I believe Tubby is a fine person, and an excellent X's and O's coach. He simply did not recruit the type of talent that can win championships.
The lack of talent is compounded by some of the player's inability or unwillingness to buy into the coach's system.
Not long ago North Carolina and UCLA experienced many of these same problems. This I believe is the silver lining. Kentucky, like these schools, will recover, and become one of the nation's elite teams again!
by ajjessiefrm on Jan 6, 2008 8:48 AM EST 0 recs








