Post-mortem on Florida Atlantic at UK

So it's time to take a look at the UK-FAU game in hindsight. And what a game it was, taking the Wildcats to 5-0 and, along with all the upsets in college football last night, give us an outside shot at landing in the top ten in the polls. But more on that later. First, a look at the good and the bad.
The Good
- André Woodson -- What can you say? 26/33 for 79% completion percentage, 5 touchdowns and one long-overdue interception. Regarding the INT, Woodson has made at least eight really bad throws this year that had a good chance to be picked. You can't do that forever. He was picked on a really poor decision, and quite frankly, it was probably for the best.
- Raphael Little -- Joker Phillips did what he was supposed to do against this team -- run the football. While FAU was stouter than expected in run defense, our multiple talented tailbacks eventually wore them out. It was a perfect example of what successful Kentucky football has looked like all season. Little was good on the run, good on the pass, and just generally had a great game.
- Dickie Lyons Jr. -- Great game for the volatile young wideout. We have many weapons in our receiving corps, and the ascendancy of Steve Johnson has kind of forced Lyons into the background a bit. But yesterday, he emerged again with 76 yards on 8 catches and 2 touchdowns.
- Average yards/play - 6.9 yards is just dominant. If we keep up this kind of offensive efficiency, there is no way to know how far this team can go.
- Micah Johnson -- Our most highly rated football player is finally coming into his own. As only a sophomore, he is showing improvement every game after taking over the MLB spot from Braxton Kelley.
- Injuries -- We have been very fortunate injury wise, and are getting healthier by the day.
- Our running back depth -- Derrick Locke is becoming a weapon.
The Bad
- Our defense against mobile quarterbacks -- If a player like Smith can give us this much trouble, what is Tebow going to do?
- Our focus on defense -- Kentucky clearly improves from first to second half, they have done so virtually every game. When are we going to give 60 minutes of effort on defense?
- Our pass rush -- No sacks yesterday. None. Zero. Against a Sun Belt team. Not good.
- Our special teams -- Punt and kick returns are still anemic. What happened to being a leader in the country last year in those two stats?
- Turnovers -- what happened to the way we were valuing the football a mere two games ago?
- Our fans -- lots of empty seats, apparently. What is that all about?
Kentucky is looking more and more like a real SEC football team, but our defense must begin to show it can play. We have seen flashes of excellence, but we have yet to see a focused, solid performance from the defense. The D-line in the first half of most of our games has been very suspect, and as the games get tougher, such ineffectiveness will get punished.
Overall, though, how can we be too critical? We expected a good season, but if you asked most Wildcat fans pre-season if 5-0 were likely, I think you would have had very few yes votes. We now have a legitimate chance to stake a claim to leadership in the SEC East with a victory on Thursday, and dispose of another unpleasant streak currently maintained by Darth Visor.
Enjoy it, Wildcat fans. The road gets a lot tougher from here, but for the moment, we are the golden boys of the SEC. Can you imagine how shocking that is to the Great Powers in the conference?
Finally, our ranking. Can you even imagine us reaching the top ten? What a comeuppance that would be for many of our rivals. But truth be told, I am not sure we should be considered that highly. Still, I wouldn't mind, just for the sake of bragging rights. These moments come along all too rarely for Kentucky football, and Kentucky fans should embrace the "precious present".

Update [2007-9-30 17:36:54 by Truzenzuzex]: As you no doubt have heard by now, Kentucky suddenly finds itself ranked firmly in the top 10 at number eight nationally. I live in Louisville, and I think I just heard a large chorus of loud popping sounds. I wonder what that could have been ... ?
0 recs |
19 comments
Comments
FirstPlace!?
by Stinky Blue on Sep 30, 2007 12:55 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Top ten
by davw83 on Sep 30, 2007 2:31 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Number 8
by senowen on Sep 30, 2007 3:51 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Defense
by tmed on Sep 30, 2007 4:15 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
This is exactly ...
Our defense is improving. Not nearly where it needs to be yet, but it is improving.
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 30, 2007 5:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ranking
I am very proud of my South Florida Bulls beating West Virginia (if anyone watched the game it was obvious USF is just better and much more athletic). Man, it doesn't get much better than this! UK and USF in the top 10, I never would have imagined this.
by WildcatinTampa on Sep 30, 2007 6:35 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
If. . .
by NYCCats on Sep 30, 2007 6:50 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Agree
by davw83 on Sep 30, 2007 7:18 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Honestly...
I mean, in my years at UK, I saw them win a total of, I think, 8 games. Something like that.
I agree with the poster who noted that UK doesn't "deserve" it's ranking...I don't believe they are better than Florida.
But who the f*ck cares? I'll take it.
Congrats to Rich Brooks, who deserves a major pat on the back, and the AD who did well not to listen to a-holes like me who didn't understand that it takes a full squad and a recruiting class or two to judge a coach's tenure.
Having an All-American QB sure helps.
The Online home of Big Blue Nation ...
by JL Blue on Sep 30, 2007 7:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Brooks ...
I'll happily eat my crow. I hear it's especially tasty with Jamaican Jerk sauce ...
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 30, 2007 7:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why isn't UK better than UF?
Florida has played a very soft schedule and they have yet to beat a good team this year. Florida has not accomplished anything so far this season to merit high ranking but UK has.
by WildcatinTampa on Sep 30, 2007 8:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know about JL ...
I'm not really sure who has played the tougher schedule to date, I think you can make a strong case UK's has been tougher. To be honest, though, we have played 3 schools who were not of SEC caliber, and Florida has only played two.
But you are correct in that Kentucky is a much better team so far. Florida isn't playing like a team. Their linebacking corps is full of underclassmen, and SEC teams have figured this out.
That's how Brandon Cox and Auburn beat Florida -- by taking what the defense gave them and running a balanced offense designed to exploit their young linebackers. Florida blitzed way too often and Auburn burned them doing it. Despite having a far superior team talentwise, Florida played very badly as a unit. The linebackers and secondary never could solve the quick slants Auburn ran, and eventually, Auburn was able to wear down their defense and run effectively inside. Note that Auburn's backs had great trouble getting outside against the Florida D-line speed -- it is truly formidable.
Defensively, Auburn demonstrated a classic strategy of surrendering yardage for time in the second half, forcing Tebow to beat them all by himself, which is just too tall an order for the sophomore.
Bottom line -- I think that right now, Florida out-talents us at 65% of the positions, some of them by a considerable amount. Where they don't do that is in the skill positions on offense. They have a much faster defense, but their youth is showing, especially in the linebacking corps. We also have a stellar linebacking corps, and that is really the only thing keeping teams from running all over us.
We will be a tough out for Florida at home. Very tough. If our defense plays it's best, they will be in a difficult spot, because we are going to score by taking what the defense gives us, and that young linebacking corps will be disadvantaged by our receivers and especially by Tamme. If they think Cox was trouble, they haven't seen trouble yet till they see Woodson, our receivers and our backs.
I like our chances against them.
by Truzenzuzex on Sep 30, 2007 10:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Talent ...
But the reason I saw that is you could take the top,s ay, 15 players of Kentucky's roster and they could play for Florida. After that, you're likely looking at a few here and there who would be on the Florida roster. Truz is on the spot when he says it's our skill players making a difference, on both sides of the ball.
That's also why this year -- and recruiting from it -- will be so damn key. The big separation between having A good season and a BUNCH of them is depth. Florida loses their players to the NFL, we lose ours to eligibility.
Until that changes for UK, Florida will always be favored to beat UK in my mind ... and here's hoping I am proven wrong every time, too.
The Online home of Big Blue Nation ...
by JL Blue on Oct 1, 2007 1:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This year
I don't expect UK to win the BCS title; I do expect UK to beat Florida because we have a more balanced offense and our defense appears to be as good and maybe better than UF's.
Remember, UF has not beated a good team yet. It is Florida that has proved nothing this year except they have an amazing man kissing QB. Florida should not be in the top 10 and those that voted Florida ahead of USF are idiots. Not a big deal as Florida is about to be destroyed by LSU next week and then will likely lose 2 of their following 4 games (sorry, no way they win all three at UK, GA and USC) and the unjustified rankings should all wash out.
by WildcatinTampa on Oct 1, 2007 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Now I hope
by WildcatinTampa on Oct 1, 2007 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Gators
by WildcatinTampa on Sep 30, 2007 8:35 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Howard
Mo
by modcpa on Oct 1, 2007 10:07 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It does ...
by Truzenzuzex on Oct 1, 2007 11:52 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 












