Is Gillispie trying to convince committed recruits to change their mind?
I got the impression from reading this blog post by John Clay that Billy Gillispie has bee working hard to convince Scotty Hopson and Bud Mackey to break their respective commitments and come to Kentucky.
For all I know, Clay is right, but quite frankly I'm not sure I buy it. First of all, no matter how highly ranked Hopson is, the truth of the matter is that we just don't really need him. Gillispie knows that, and Hopson knows that.
Now, that surely doesn't mean Gillispie would turn down Hopson if he wanted to change his mind. The recent rumors by various outlets of Hopson's "people" making semi-covert calls on UK's campus supports a rather different take in my opinion -- that of Hopson not really all that happy now when faced with playing for an MSU team that will almost certainly not be competing for the SEC championship, let alone the NCAA title.
Hopson needs to go to MSU. He picked his pony,now let him ride it. If it breaks down, those are the breaks. Maybe he is good enough to will MSU into contention all by himself. If so, great. But one thing for sure -- he won't be playing with the likes of Patrick Patterson, or Joe Crawford, or Alex Legion at MSU, and maybe he is fine with that.
My point is, I believe Hopson was feeling out UK, not the other way around. I think he found that Gillispie was happy for him to come, but was unwilling to make any promises to get that to happen. In other words, he said something like "Scotty, we'll be happy to have you, but I have to be honest -- we are loaded at your position. You're going to have to earn your spot." Do you think Rick Stansbury's conversation was substantially similar? I doubt it.
As to Bud Mackey, I don't believe Gillispie is really after him either. He is another player for which our need is not too great, and I think we have better options either already committed or available.
Darius Miller, on the other hand, is a different story. I think Coach Gillispie absolutely wants him, and that badly. The other two guys, from a state recruiting standpoint, were already committed elsewhere when he came, and no rational person really expects Gillispie to convince them to change their minds. Miller, however, is uncommitted, and Gillispie will take some heat if he goes elsewhere from some UK fans, even though the coach is disadvantaged by his short tenure at UK and others have been on Miller much longer.
Clay also tells us that Florida seems to have dropped off Miller's list, and that is good news for sure. Illinois is turning out to be tough comp, and I believe it will come down to Illinois and Kentucky by the time it is all said and done. I'm not ruling out Traitor Rick and Bruce Pearl for his services, but my intuition tells me they are not going to win in the end.
0 recs |
5 comments
Comments
Miller would be a fabulous
Per Bud Mackey, UK certainly doesn't need another PG.
Do you really believe that MSU doesn't have Joe Crawford caliber players? Crawford shot 44% from the field, only 64% from the line and 35% from behind the arc. Very average. Jamont Gordon last year averaged 2 more points per game, shot 42% / 71% / 35% while adding more than 7 rebounds and 5 assists per game (Joe averaged 4 and 2). Lamont and Joe both played 32 minutes per game.
OK, maybe I am picky, I understand where you are going with this. UK is receiving lots of buzz, big time recruits are excited about UK again and MSU has all the glamour and excitment of a Rosie O'Donnel / Roseanne Barr jello wrestling match. I would want to change my mind too. And given he is a KY guy, even more reason to reconsider.
by Catfan on Aug 14, 2007 10:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Heh ...
Yet I am not convinced Gordon is a better player than Crawford, although in this particular case, I have little to support me other than a high ranking out of high school that has yet to be justified. Certainly the rest of the players on MSU's team don't seem to reach the caliber of Kentucky's, Hopson notwithstanding.
Still, I have always had the impression that Hopson is not a team player. Time will tell that tale, and he is no doubt talented. But personally, I am happy to see him go elsewhere.
Perhaps that is Crawford's problem as well. Let us both hope that four years is long enough for him to get it straight.
by Truzenzuzex on Aug 14, 2007 11:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know
I do hope Crawford lives up to the recruiting hype of four years ago. I hope he is workign hard and I hope he is motivated to play extremely hard. Meeks and Legion will bring stiff competition for playing time; however, I have a feeling crawford is going to have his best season yet.
by Catfan on Aug 15, 2007 1:53 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think ...
I think the change in coaches will benefit Crawford more than any other player.
by Truzenzuzex on Aug 15, 2007 6:59 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
For the past few years
I just hope it isn't too late for Joe. I flip flop all the time on whether or not I think he plays selfishly. I do respect him and give him credit for correcting a very bad freshman year decision, putting it behind him and moving forward. Many, maybe most 18 year olds, would not have been able to do that.
by Catfan on Aug 15, 2007 8:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 














