Gridiron Thursday: Keenan Burton gets love, team gets dissed a dose of reality
So just how good is Keenan Burton, anyway? Well, Lindy's says "He was good; now he's scary good", in a relatively new article dated July 1st.
Chip Cosby, the author of the article, details some of the things that make Keenan special:
43.5 inch vertical on a football player?? Great Googly-Moogly! I don't think we have a basketball player on our current team with those kind of ups.
Of course, freakish athleticism does not a wide receiver make -- you have to be able to catch that funny-looking oblong ball, not just beat everyone to it, and it seems Burton has that skill also. Last year's 77 catches for 1,036 yards and 12 touchdowns are not the kind of numbers Marvin Stone-hands would put up if he had been capable of playing football. A pity he wasn't that good at basketball, either.
But back to Burton. It seems most of the SEC expects him to excel this year, even if they have much less respect for any Wildcat not named Burton, Little or Woodson. But that is the subject for later.
Burton is getting some recognition from the know-it-alls of the football world. Mel Kipper has Burton at #24 on his Big Board for 2008, so that is recognition of a sort, I suppose. Lindy's tabs him at #14 in the wide receiver category, and that only 4 schools in the country are picked higher than UK in the receiving corps. Burton is no doubt the major reason why.

In other football news, some of SB Nation's SEC bloggers are starting to look at Kentucky's chances, and I don't see much bowing and scraping to the threat of our offensive skill players. That's probably because they all know that our O-line and defense in general is likely to ... what's the word I'm looking for? ... Ah, yes -- SUCK -- by way of comparison.
For example, Kyle King of Dawg Sports ranks us above only Troy and Western Carolina as toughness of opponent this year -- even below Vandy (because the Dawgs get UK at home). It's obvious Woodson, Burton and company don't exactly strike the fear of God into him.
I know, I know ... I'm the one who has been all "Rah rah" lately about the 'Cats chances this year, and I am writing a series called "Return to Glory" (a bit metaphorical, that). Occasionally, however, we at A Sea of Blue must allow reality, however unpleasant, enter into our Blue World Order.
The best that you can say about our offensive line right now is that they are "unproven". Likewise for the defense, the best we can say at this point is that they are likely to suck less than last year. Not exactly cause for running out to Vegas and placing 10K on the 'Cats to play in the BCS.
What I am saying is; I will let most of this casual disrespect go by unchallenged, because, well frankly, it's impossible to challenge at this point. Our team should be the best in years, but as we all know, we are facing arguably the toughest schedule in our entire history, and certainly the toughest in recent history. Yes, we have a lot of home games -- against top 15 opponents! Optimism will only take us so far, and I refuse to cross the line into fantasy.
But I am going to stick by my contention that we will pull two upsets this year and hold our own on the "easy" part of the schedule, which should get us bowl eligible. But winning seven games this year will be an impressive accomplishment, and represents significant, if not totally unwarranted, optimism.

Larry Vaught just came out today with an article in the Danville Advocate-Messenger suggesting Rich Brooks would be better off moving Micah Johnson to DE rather than leaving him at MLB, backing up Braxton Kelly. I think Brooks should listen to him. Wildcat's Thunder mentioned this earlier, and it has been out there a while.
I agree with Vaught. Johnson is too good not to be out on the field.
Update [2007-7-5 17:50:35 by Truzenzuzex]: Not sure who this guy is, but my feed reader says he is from WQXI-AM in Atlanta, and he says Rich Brooks has taken UK from "Obscurity To Respectability In The SEC". He has some nice observations.
0 recs |
5 comments
Comments
YAAAAAY>>>>>
Sorry... just couldn't resist.
by blueblood on Jul 5, 2007 11:17 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm not sure...
Although I will admit that 07's schedule is much tougher than 06's was, I am more inclined to think that for the first time in a long time we as UK fans are giving ourselves an honest evaluation of our chances. Knowing that we'll be better, improved, and even "Good" as a team for 07 instead of the classic UK Football blue-tinted no-reality-based optimism of (many) seasons' past.
It's amazing how much different (and even more honestly) you view your team's chances when you actually ARE good, instead of just PRETENDING that you are good.
by vickster3 on Jul 5, 2007 1:54 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I will be happy...
I have my tickets and am ready for some cold stadium seats baby! Bring on the oblong ball.
by wilson452 on Jul 5, 2007 2:32 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
great use
by UKWildCatFanatic on Jul 5, 2007 3:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I am 100 percent with you Tru on our chances......
Woodson.
Little.
Dixon.
Burton.
Tamme.
Lyons. Just a Junior but a leader none the less.
Stevie Johnson.
Woodyard.
Pryor.
Kelley.
Lindley. Just s redshirt sophomore who is way mature beyond his years.
We U of Kentucky fans must stop "hoping" we will win and start "expecting" us to win instead.
Actually I think most U of Kentucky fans are definitely like that.
We UK fans actually hate "moral victories" in football much worse than any other "basketball" school I know. We support our football team much, much more than any other "basketball" school in the country. No question about it.
And for the first time ever in my entire life here on planet earth I think U of Kentucky's football future is very bright indeed.
GO 'CATS! WE BELIEVE! SHOCK THE WORLD THIS YEAR!
by ukcatfan191 on Jul 5, 2007 6:48 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 












