And the hits just keep on commin' ...
As you know, we here at A Sea of Blue have little tolerance for hyperbole and excessive rhetorical embroidery. We prefer more thoughtful and pithy commentary for our discriminating readers.
To that end, I will bring you a few of the more interesting reads I have found on Al Gore's Folly this morning. As you might expect, it is "All Smith, all the time", so if you are tired of reading about people's opinion of the head coaching situation at Kentucky, this post is probably not going to lighten your fatigue.
First of all, I bring you the deep ruminations of Seth Davis, who always seems to hold some kind of opinion about everything:
I think that's right. Whether you support Smith or not, the current situation UK basketball finds itself in is unsustainable. Will Tubby get a chance to prove it was just a couple of down years? I predict we will know by April 3rd.
Mark Bradley at the Atlanta Journal-Constitution says that he helped bring down Joe B. Hall, and now he wants to get into the act with Tubby Smith - so he proposes the novel theory that Chris Lofton is the straw that broke the camel's back:
Personally, I think this guy is full of beans, but then, who knows? Lofton recriminations have been a fixture of the anti-Smith debate, and nobody seems to care about the fact that he was only a slow-footed 3-star and to take him, we would have had to withdraw a scholarship offer from a 5-star player.
Blame the rankings, but that's a hard pill to swallow - kind of like saying we should offer Stephon Pettigrew Patrick Patterson or Jai Lucas' scholarship. Maybe it would work out, but if it didn't ...
The Denver Post likens Kentucky fans to a "mob", and suggests Barnhart's statement may have made the situation even worse:
But there is a meme going round that's indefensible - that Kentucky lacks the "talent" to get to the Final Four ®, and the Denver Post repeats it:
Smith recruited 3 McDonalds All-Americans, two of which are still on the team, along with four talented freshmen and 3 senior role players. Maybe that isn't this year's North Carolina team, but to call Kentucky "void ... of talent" is just baffling. True, the junior class hasn't lived up to expectation, but Smith hardly deserves the blame for that.
The Blogosphere also has some worthy comments. The NCAA hoops blog sees Smith as spinning the AD's statement of (non?) support. Netwire thinks that the situation at Kentucky will be 10 times as ugly as what happened at Indiana last year.
Finally, Monica Roberts at TransGoit is in full throat about the racial implications of the Tubby Smith drama. She makes some interesting points, some of which I agree with and some of which I don't. But this point is something I would bet the farm on:
We will be seeing a lot more of this discussion in the coming days. It is simply unavoidable, and how we handle it will say a lot about how painful this entire situation will ultimately be.
Coming sometime today - the preview of UK vs. Florida II. With all the Smith talk, it is easy to forget we are just a fortnight away from the ides of March, and the biggest basketball events of the year are looming ...
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
humm
But to hold Tubby and staff harmless for not developing the number 1 recruiting class in the country seems strange to me. A coach is responsible for recruiting, in game coach AND developing the kids to their potential. They've got to be responsible for kids like Morris, Crawford, Buike, Barbour, Stone, and Rondo not developing their games. Just like they get credit for developing guys like Estill and Daniels. That's part of the job description imo.
We do not lack the talent to be a top 15 team, that's silly. We've got experience, depth, and good freshman. We're missing the PF that would give us the talent to be a FF team. But that doesn't mean we don't have the talent to be second in SEC East, or a top 15 club.
by kb22stang on Mar 2, 2007 10:50 AM EST reply actions
See ...
Developing their games
FACT
That Tubby has put so many players into the league that never was a AA says somthing. He needs to go after his kinds of guys. His recruiting miscues are valid but the man can develop talent that desired to work. The problem is the past few years he has gone and gotten the worng kind of players, those who dont have talent and those who do but dont realize the work they have to put into their game to become a professional athlete. Pro players make it look so easy I think a lot of young men do not reliaze the sacrifices you have to make to get that good.
Well ...
According to this analysis which you can find linked also in JL's excellent look at burger boy recruiting earlier this year, about 52% of McD's play some in the NBA. However, significantly fewer (43%) are ever NBA starters.
So while you are correct that player development isn't all on the coach, and a very significant number of McD's never reach the NBA, a tiny majority actually do.
Tubby
Let's face it. He is not God. Well, I guess we can't have everything.
Your logic ...
Joking.
There are lots of non-basketball reasons (and some basketball reasons) to keep Smith.
Just not sure anyone is listening.
The Online home of Big Blue Nation ...
Good Point Tru
Well ...
drafted round 1 3 7.3%
drafted round 2 1 2.4%
played in NBA 7 17.1%
started in NBA 5 12.2%
total recruits 41
So it looks like 7 have played, and 5 have started.
Unreasonable expectations
The problem with rankings is that, with the exception of a three game losing streak recently, we weren't given enough credit for our strength of schedule.
We just didn't have that many opponents in the 11-20 range. It was top 5 or 50-100.
And I have a big problem with rankings anyway. Isn't RPI supposed to matter? Won't an RPI of 7 or 8 keep us from being a 9 seed? Gotta be worth something, right?

by 







