Too many questions, not enough answers
I personally hate to write articles asking hard questions of a new coach in the middle of a difficult season. I hate it. I love to write feel-good articles about the Wildcats that rally the Big Blue Nation and make us all wait with bated breath for the next game. That's when blogging is fun. But "feel good" articles are hard to write under the current circumstances, not only because they are in discord with reality, but because they represent an example of a fan base that is out of touch with the simple facts in front of them. So I am forced to write articles like the one just below, and (warning, dear reader) this one.
John Clay has a very ... pointed article over at the Herald-Leader that is, in my mind, an example of good journalism that we should be pretty proud of. Like most of us, he doesn't have any interest in coach-bashing or team bashing, but knows something is amiss and understands that to just ignore it is neither desirable nor responsible. I would very much like to hide my head, stay away from the Internet for a few days and just write "In Gillispie we trust, this is all Tubby's faultĀ®" 1000 times in my own blood. Unfortunately, that is neither responsible nor fair to our fans and program.
The things that John talks about are these:
- A.J. Stewart apparently earned the start, played for 5 minutes, and never returned to the game.
- Michael porter, same story except substitute "7" for "5".
- Jodie Meeks never sees the floor in the first half, and plays much of the second.
When asked about these things, Coach Gillispie replied:
- "I just thought we could do a little bit better with the guys we had out on the court."
- --ditto--
- "I said I'll play him when he's available. We need Jodie to be at his best because he's a very good player and we need him. Believe me, I would like to have him out there all the time, when he's capable, and when he's available, and when he's ready and all of those kinds of things."
Well. All I can say about this is that Gillispie is not being totally honest with anyone on this, and if he is ... well, that opens an entirely different set of questions that, because they are so hypothetical, I'll just keep to myself. My reaction to all this is exactly the same as Clay's -- "Huh?"
John goes on to mention the strange circumstances surrounding Patterson's absence from the Houston game. Now, I'm not a conspiracy theorist, so I don't have a clue what to make of all this, but it is a little bit more than passing strange. I always thought Tubby Smith's activities were opaque and hidden from view, but Gillispie seems to be taking this to levels previously unknown, professing ignorance about virtually everything he is asked, or giving hyper-simplistic answers. To be fair, "I just thought we could do a little better with the guys we had out on the court" isn't anything other than apparently honest, but surely he can imagine that UK basketball fans would appreciate a bit more detail, like "I thought the guys we had out there would be more capable of busting the zone they were using to hold down Pat, based on the way they were practicing," or something like that that gives UK fans credit for knowing something about the game. "I just thought it was a good idea at the time" will get Gillispie no points with either the media or most UK fans.
Answer number three is nothing more than a filibuster, and somebody needs to tell Gillispie that the Senate that welcomes those is about 500 miles east of here. We know Meeks is good, Coach, and we know that you want to play him. What we don't know is how he magically "became available" between the end of the first half and the beginning of the second. What is the process? And if you don't know, who can we talk to who does know? Surely, somebody must have an answer to this mystery.
Look, if Gillispie wants to play the "Aw, shucks" card to the point where we learn to hate it, fine -- it's his career. But in this writer's humble opinion, he is losing not only ball games, but the confidence of many in the Big Blue Nation, although I am currently not among them and do have confidence Gillispie can get the job done. John Clay's lede expressed my feelings perfectly: "If Gillispie has plan, it's invisible to naked eye."

26 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
BCG's plan
by BeatUL on Dec 30, 2007 10:31 AM EST reply actions
Last day of 07.....
by ncaamostwins on Dec 31, 2007 10:22 AM EST up reply actions
Being careful
by ncaamostwins on Dec 31, 2007 10:30 AM EST up reply actions
The Train Wreck
However, if this season is a trainwreck, when did the train derail? I would argue the train started off the track at least four years ago when Tubby Smith began recruiting players who did not bleong in the SEC, much less in a UK uniform. There is no arguing that Tubby Smith failed to recruit consistantly or that he failed to bring in a depth of top tier talent.Tubby never signed a player that has played in a Final Four.
Now that the train wreck is in full view we are all stopping to view the carnage. It is ugly. It is disgusting. There is a new engineer who has been hired to put the train back on the track and move it fll steam ahead. Yet he is left with a wrecked train incapable of going full steam ahead. It is not even "the little train that could." Yet the passer-byes, the rubberneckers look at the new engineer and the scream what the hell is he doing? Why isn't this train moving faster?
Enough of the analogy, you get the point. Complaining about BCG 11 games into his tenure is ignorant. He did not derail the UK train, he is picking up the pieces and doing the best he can with one lousy piece of machinery.
I once thought UK fans were knowledgeable about basketball. What I know realize is they let emotions overtake reason and reality and we are back to the days when everyone was screaming "J.B. hall ain't no coach." Unbelievable.
by BeatUL on Dec 30, 2007 10:43 AM EST reply actions
I think ...
But the coach is clearly making some decisions that are questionable, and then refusing to explain them at any level of detail. He is certainly deserving of the same scrutiny we would give to any person in his position, and I and many others have questions which the coach has essentially refused to answer, or answered with non-responses.
That's his right. He is being paid to do a job, and whether or not I like the way he is doing it is irrelevant. But for me, there hasn't been a satisfactory explanation, or rather, any explanation, of why we are struggling so mightily. To me, it doesn't look as though we should be having this much difficulty against such weak competition as San Diego and Gardner-Webb.
I don't feel out of line questioning Coach Gillispie about these things. It's true he is paid to do a job, but as a fan, I reserve the right to evaluate how that job looks to me. Not everyone will agree, of course, nor should they -- these are my thoughts, and I respect the fact that others will be inclined to just say nothing or defend Gillispie at this point, even though I don't feel like I am attacking him at all.
And lest we forget, coaching is a two-way street. It is just like Mr. Miaghi said in the Karate Kid -- you have to make a sacred pact between teacher and student ... "Teacher say, student do." If we don't have that pact, I think it's fair to wonder why, and to ask what it will take to get this team playing passable basketball. Actually playing good basketball seems a far-off dream at this moment, but that's probably more perception than reality.
I just wish we could get something more out of him than "It seemed like a good idea at the time." Maybe that's all there is, I don't know. But it doesn't satisfy me.
I respect and understand why some would be very defensive of Gillispie right now -- he has had very little time and there is no doubt that many things outside his control have conspired to help get this season off to such a rocky start. I want to defend him too, but he has to give me something to work with, and right now he doesn't seem interested in doing that.
With all that said, we have to be tolerant of each other. I will require that people here keep the dissent reasonable and on point, and we must stay respectful of diverse opinions, even ones we don't agree with. Begging everything off to emotionalism or ignorance is something that we should avoid -- it is a facile judgment that is disrespectful of people by making assumptions for which we have too little information, and it poisons reasonable debate.
Civility and respectfulness needs to be our creed, regardless of the opinions we hold.
by Glenn Logan on Dec 30, 2007 12:11 PM EST up reply actions
Fans
So, those fans can go cheer for somebody else....my Cats will come back.........they always do.
by Chuck Alexinis on Dec 30, 2007 11:21 AM EST reply actions
No, Chuck, nooooo ....
Seriously, UK does have a number of bandwagon fans, and they tend to jump off in a huff at every loss.
If Kentucky doesn't win another game this season, most Wildcat fans will watch every one. It's hard to watch futility when we have so much emotion invested in our program, but I don't think you'll see all that many fans really do that. When you read that crap in message boards, it is just venting.
Fortunately, most of the people who visit here don't vent much, and I appreciate that. I have to admit, I had to "just walk away" from the blog after yesterday, and I can't tell you how many times in my life I have written some long, angry screed only to delete it.
Don't be too hard on those who are losing it right now. The provocation is sufficient, but I am hopeful we won't have to endure it much longer.
by Glenn Logan on Dec 30, 2007 12:17 PM EST up reply actions
True Fan comment..........
by Chuck Alexinis on Dec 30, 2007 1:48 PM EST up reply actions
The problem isn't just Gillispie...
And sorry, but the problem is also in the lack of recruiting a few years ago that is coming back to haunt us.
And some of it is bad luck. Injuries have played a huge part of this mess. But really, how many freshmen walk-ons come into Rupp and go 4 for 4 on threes? Tell me Vaden is going to be that hot again all year?
And who knew Lofton would be this good? Sure, Tubby was the only person in the state of Kentucky that didn't see his value, but who knew he'd turn out to be such a good player?
Luck and timing, folks. I agree with the first poster. Just get through the season as best you can...hopefully we'll be at full strength and ride a little momentum in a weaker than normal SEC.
Crawford and Ramel?
www.BillyGsucks.com
by BillyGsucks on Dec 30, 2007 7:51 PM EST up reply actions
Re: catlanta91
Actually the only "big name" coach who recruited Lofton hard was Huggins at Cincy. Lofton fell into Buzz Petersons lap after he kicked one of his guards off of the team, which opened up the scholly.
Not a big issue, but it drives me crazy when people intimate Lofton was a much sought after recruit. Rivals had him ranked 142 his senior year.
by Ken Howlett on Dec 31, 2007 12:06 AM EST up reply actions
All I can say is...
Re:
In response to some of those queries:
- I think the brief stretch late in the first half where Gillispie had Stevenson and Patterson on the floor swayed Billy's decision not to play Stewart in the second half. Although, Stevenson was noticeably worse in the second half, so how this is defensible, I'm not sure. At the very least, Stewart is better than Coury.
- I have no concerns about Porter not playing. With Jasper and Meeks available, I'm not sure how Porter fits in the guard rotation.
- It's possible Gillispie already decided that he wanted Jasper in during the first half, and Meeks in the second. Rushing Meeks back (and having him play extensive minutes) for the Houston game led him to sit out the next one, so perhaps Gillispie wanted to "take it slow" for both players.
- Patterson did not take part in the pre-game shootaround against UH. He was stretching with the trainers right up until the buzzer. He did, however, participate in the halftime shootaround, which led me to hope that he was entering the game. Alas, he did not.
Miss Watching Good Basketball
What do you want Gillispie to say?
What Gillispie is doing is very clear to me. He is testing the material he has to work with. Trying different combinations, seeing how players play and react in different combinations. He is preparing, planning and developint the future. This is the right course to take but it is understandably difficult to accept for most.
Why did Meeks only play in the 2nd half? Against Houston Meeks looked like he was going to pass out from exhaustion; he is only good for 1/2 full speed right now. Good God people use some common sense. I am just waiting to hear the "Gillispie ain't no coach."
by BeatUL on Dec 30, 2007 5:49 PM EST reply actions
We'd Just Better Hope
Right now, I honestly don't know what to think of Gillispie's coaching ability or his handling of people in general. I don't know about his "people" skills.
I am not a big fan of Joe Crawford, never have been, but, at this point in time we need him on the floor for his scoring ability. BCG seems to be playing with Crawford's mind & diminishing the one skill he has.
Does anyone out there think that this team respects the coach? I would be interested to hear from the BBN on that one. Or do you think that they fear him? Or do they just not even know what to think at this point?
Something is wrong. I just wish the coach would talk to us as knowledgeable b-ball fans. I think that would go a long way in cutting the guy some slack. I don't like the arrogance factor in his answers. Don't ever think that the fans & the unhappiness with Tubby didn't have something to do with his departure.
Plain and simple
What we do know is the tid bits of information we pick up from game announcers about how hard the pre game practice is,and finally,what we see on the floor during the game.Maybe Coach Gillispie is using these pre SEC games as a training ground for the real battle which is SEC Conference play.
Who really knows? Hopefully Coach Gillispie!
by UKats on Dec 30, 2007 6:26 PM EST reply actions
Coach, help us help you
by slamgrass on Dec 30, 2007 8:00 PM EST reply actions
Good comment ...
At this point, faith is all we have. Gillispie has given us little else to support our hopes.
By the way, if you select "auto format" from the drop-down box at the bottom, you can make paragraphs. Makes reading a long comment much easier. :-)
He has given us a lot..
The previous three years we were given Porter, Williams and Carter.
by BeatUL on Dec 31, 2007 6:57 AM EST up reply actions
Thanks Tru
by slamgrass on Dec 31, 2007 8:55 AM EST up reply actions
Truz.....
djoeanddebby@zoominternet.net
by xgrunt on Dec 30, 2007 8:19 PM EST reply actions
Bad
I can appreciate sticking to your guns, but if the guns are shooting blanks?
I just wish there was some type of adjustment during the game - change defense, something. I am tired of watching this team allow one person to beat them every game.
Adjustments
by slamgrass on Dec 31, 2007 9:03 AM EST up reply actions

by 











